How To Use Template

How to use the attrition program template The purpose of the template is to differentiate a core group of employees who have excelled in past performance and who show signs of probable

Trang 1

\~ TechRepublic Bile mum m dceliciuim cia ric

Real World Real Time Real IT

How to use the attrition program template

The purpose of the template is to differentiate a core group of employees who have excelled in past performance and who show signs of probable future excellence This template is in an easy-to-use format that can be used for summarizing views on a particular employee’s 2

Ps (performance and potential)

This template should be used by any manager in the middle or senior management group who has worked with the employee to be

assessed for at least 12 months Managers should use this to assess any employee who has completed at least 18 months of work

experience

How to fill in the template:

e The employee's Period Served In The Organization information can be obtained from the personnel or HR department of the company You can devise a cut-off to limit the assessment to employees who can be assessed reliably, the reason being if one has not served at least 12 or 18 months, it would be difficult to judge the performance

e The data for the Section A, Quantitative Performance can also be obtained from the HR department This should be something that has already been conveyed to the employee and is on record Higher weightage is given to the later half of the year, to bring in the latest progress shown by employee For example, if we are in July 2003, the following could be the case

Quantitative Performance over last three Half Years (HY) (Performance Rating achieved on a 5-point scale)

HY1 (Jan — June 2002) 4.25 (on a 5-point scale) | Weightage 20% Wtd Score (4.25 x 20%) 0.85

HY2 (Jun — Dec 2002) 3.75 (on a 5-point scale) I Weightage 30% Wtd Score (3.75 x 30%)

HY3 (Jan — Jun 2003) 4.00 (on a 5-point scale) I Weightage 50% Wtd Score (4.00 x 50%) 2.0

Total Wtd Score

To see more downloads and get your free TechRepublic membership, please visit www.techrepublic.com/downloads

Trang 2

\~ TechRepublic Bile mum m dceliciuim cia ric

®

Then comes qualitative performance

Qualitative Performance feedback (Rate on a 5-point scale—explain with remarks if rating given is more than 4 or less than 2.5)

Work attitude exhibited beyond call of duty (50% weightage)

Supporting peers | 4 | Remarks| <remarks to justify the rating can come here> |

Supporting managers | 4 | Remarks| |

= average (4,3,4) * weightage ==11/3*50% = 1.83

Setting up processes | 2 | Remarks| |

=3*25% = 0.75

Leadership skills shown (25% weightage)

On internal group tasks 3 | Remarks| |

On external task mgt | 5 | Remarks| |

=4*25%=1.00

SCORE

So, the total score on the Performance Assessment would be an average of the quantitative and qualitative scores (3.98 and 3.58, in this case) The average for the person in this example would be 3.78

e Section B: Potential Assessment These are ratings that will be given by the reporting manager For example, he or she could rate as follows (Ratings are in bold below.)

Trang 3

\~ TechRepublic’

How to use the attrition program template

SECTION B : POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT

Comment on this employee’s next positions (next 2 years)

Potential of the employee in managing his team: (Cross the appropriate option)

| He can lead sales in the South Asia region xyz

Staffing / Hiring 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Delegating 4 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate Motivating 4 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Resolving conflict 5 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

RATING SO FAR = AVERAGE of 3,4,4,5 and 2 = 18/5 = 3.6

Potential for personal drive & tenacity as seen from: (Cross the appropriate option)

Initiative 5 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Persistence 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate Creativity 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate Planning skills 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate Critical thinking 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Restraint 4 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Leadership 4 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Self-confidence 2 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate Interpersonal relationship mgt 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

Responsiveness 3 Exceptional Commendable Good Manageable Inadequate

RATING for this section = AVERAGE = 35/ 11 = 3.18

Trang 4

®

Total Potential Rating

(assuming equal weight

between the two sub

parameters) Average of 3.6, 3.18 = 3.4

What is he or she personally doing to become more proficient for future assignments?

- Listens well to feedback

- ls undergoing a evening degree program at the local university

- Is focused on sales as his career option and constantly attends seminars and is a great networker

- xX

- y

TOTAL SCORE ON

POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT

Signature of Reviewer Signature of Moderator

So, what we have as the coordinates are 3.78 on performance and 3.4 on potential In our program, a cut off of 3.5 for performance and 3.25 on potential would qualify this employee for inclusion in our core program

Định dạng
Số trang	4
Dung lượng	259,72 KB

Tiêu đề	How to use the attrition program template
Thể loại	Template
Năm xuất bản	2003