The main contents of this chapter include all of the following: Marginal utility, the law of diminishing returns, total utility, maximizing utility, the water-diamond paradox, consumer surplus.
Trang 1Chapter 25
Education
Trang 2Chapter Outline
• INVESTMENTS IN HUMAN CAPITAL
• SHOULD WE SPEND MORE?
• SCHOOL REFORM ISSUES
• COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY
EDUCATION
Trang 3Investments in Human Capital
• Human Capital: the ability of a person to
create goods and services
• An education is an investment like any other
– You incur costs early – You reap rewards later
• Any investment only makes economic sense
if the net present value (the present value of the benefits minus the present value of the costs) is positive
Trang 4Why “Free” Public Schools are
not “Free”
• Taxpayers pay $389 billion in taxes to
support the system.
• Some states and school districts have
fees (such as textbook rental) that parents must pay.
Trang 5Analyzing the Education Decision
• If parents had to pay the entire cost of K-12
education and chose not to send their children to school they would still incur daycare costs for their smaller children
• Parents would then compare the present
value of benefits to the present value of the tuition costs minus daycare costs
Trang 6Why “Free” Public School Makes Economic Sense
• The external benefits (the benefits to the rest
of society that result from a child being educated) are such that the efficient price is zero
• External benefits include
– the social stability that is enhanced by providing opportunity for all to succeed.
– the more intelligent voting population.
– the greater tax base associated with higher incomes.
Trang 7Modeling External Benefits
Social Benefit External Benefits
0
Enrolled Students D
S Tuition
T*
S*
T’
S’
What
Schools
Get
Trang 8Should We Spend More?
• What we get for our $300 billion in tax
money
– More real spending per student – Lower student-teacher ratios – Flat to declining SATs
– Increasing high school graduation rates
Trang 9More Per Student Spending
1996 Dollars
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
19591965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998
Year
Real Spending per pupil
Trang 10Lower Student-Teacher Ratios
16
18
20
22
24
26
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Year
Student-Teacher Ratio
Trang 11Flat to Declining SATs
490
500
510
520
530
540
550
1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Year
SATM SATV
SATs
Math and Verbal
Trang 12Higher High School Graduation Rates
0
20
40
60
80
100
1940 1960 1980 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999
Year
High School Graduation Rates
by race
Trang 13Cautions Against Quick
Conclusions
• Much of the increased spending has gone for
– Noninstructional spending (e.g.Janitors, secretaries, administration)
– Special education spending (more than 10% of students now qualify for special services)
• Some of the decline in SATs comes from
more (and less academically prepared) students taking the exams
• Some of the increase is graduation rates
comes from GEDs, and social promotion
Trang 14The Economic Literature on
Education Spending
• Economists have studied the relationship
between student success and spending The majority show little relationship
– Measures of success
• Graduation rates, standardized test scores
– Inputs
• Student-teacher ratios
• Teacher degree attainment
• Teacher salaries
Trang 15The Education Production
Function
Test Scores
Teacher Quality/Quantity
Education Production Function
The flat of the curve.
The argument is that in this range more spending does not increase scores.
Trang 16School Reform Issues
• The public school as a monopoly
– Lack of competition makes all monopolies less cost- and quality-conscious.
• The existence of tenure (the job protection for teachers with experience) and the lack of
merit pay
– Tenured teachers can not be fired for poor teaching and good teachers are rarely paid more than poor ones
• Private vs Public Education and Vouchers
– Creating competition would stimulate cost and quality consciousness Evidence is mixed.
Trang 17College and University
Education
• Costs are higher than K-12
– Teachers spend less time in the classroom
• 6 to 12 hours per week
• Spend time on research, committees, keeping
up with the latest in their fields.
– Equipment and lab costs are substantially higher
Trang 18More College Graduates
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1940 1960 1980 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999
Year
College Graduation Rates
by Race
Trang 19What is a College Degree
Worth
• Present Value of Costs
– Opportunity costs of lost work time – Tuition
– (not living expenses…you have to eat)
• Present Value of Benefits
– Increased expected earnings over a lifetime
• Net Present Value
– Estimates vary between $300,000 and $500,000 for the positive net present value