(BQ) Part 1 book Gastrointestinal imaging presents the following contents: Pharynx and esophagus, stomach, small bowel, appendix, colon, anorectum, diffuse and vascular liver disease. Invite you to consult.
Trang 4Koenraad J. Mortele, MD
Associate Professor of RadiologyHarvard Medical SchoolDepartment of RadiologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts
Benjamin M. Yeh, MD
Professor of RadiologyUCSF Department of Radiology and
Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California
With Medical Illustrations by
Heike Blum
Medical IllustratorMüenster, Germany
Trang 5Oxford It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research,
scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.
Oxford New York
Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and certain other countries.
Published in the United States of America by
Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
© Oxford University Press 2015
Original Artwork © H Blum.
All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law,
by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Gastrointestinal imaging (Levy)
Gastrointestinal imaging / edited by Angela D Levy, Koenraad J Mortele, Benjamin M Yeh.
p ; cm.—(Rotations in radiology)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978–0–19–975942–2 (alk paper)
I Levy, Angela D., editor II Mortele, Koenraad J., editor III Yeh, Benjamin, editor IV Title V Series: Rotations in radiology.
[DNLM: 1 Digestive System Diseases—diagnosis 2 Diagnosis, Differential
3 Diagnostic Imaging—methods 4 Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System WI 141] RC804.D52
616.3′0754—dc23
2014028627
This material is not intended to be, and should not be considered, a substitute for medical or other professional advice Treatment for the conditions described in this material is highly dependent on the individual circumstances And, while this material is designed to offer accurate information with respect to the subject matter covered and to be current as of the time it was written, research and knowledge about medical and health issues is constantly evolving and dose schedules for medications are being revised continually, with new side effects recognized and accounted for regularly Readers must therefore always check the product information and clinical procedures with the most up-to-date published product information and data sheets provided by the manufacturers and the most recent codes of conduct and safety regulation The publisher and the authors make no representations or warranties to readers, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this material Without limiting the foregoing, the publisher and the authors make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or efficacy of the drug dosages mentioned in the material The authors and the publisher do not accept, and expressly disclaim, any responsibility for any liability, loss or risk that may be claimed or incurred as a consequence of the use and/or application of any of the contents of this material.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed in the United States of America
on acid-free paper
Trang 6To my husband Asa, for his love and infinite support.
—ADL
To Dejana, for her infinite love and support, and my four beautiful children, Charlotte, Christophe, Mabel and Mila,
who make me proud every day and remind me of what is truly important in life
—KJM
To my wife, Dr. Z. Jane Wang, and our kids, who inspire us daily
—BMY
Trang 8The views expressed in Section 14, Multisystem Disorders
and Syndromes, are those of the authors and do not
neces-sarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed
Services University of the Health Sciences, Department of the Air Force, Navy or Army; Department of Defense or the US Government
Trang 10Preface xv
Contributors xvii
Section I: Pharynx and Esophagus
1 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
of the Pharynx and Esophagus 3
4 Pharyngeal and Esophageal Diverticula 16
Marc S. Levine
A Zenkers and Killian-Jamieson Diverticula 16
B Thoracic Esophageal Diverticula 18
Section II: Stomach
11 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
Trang 11Section III: Small Bowel
20 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
of the Small Bowel 119
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
21 Congenital and Developmental Abnormalities 124
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Malrotation 124
B Paraduodenal Hernia 126
22 Diverticula of the Small Bowel 130
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Diverticulosis of the Small Bowel 130
B Meckel’s Diverticulum 132
23 Crohn’s Disease 136
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
24 Other Inflammatory Disorders 142
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Tuberculosis 142
B Small Bowel Parasites 144
C Opportunistic Small Bowel Infections 146
D Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Enteropathy 149
25 Celiac Disease 151
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
26 Small Bowel Obstruction 156
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Mechanical Small Bowel Obstruction 156
B Closed-Loop Obstruction and Strangulation 159
27 Small Bowel Intussusception 163
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
31 Benign Tumors of the Small Bowel 180
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Ectopic Pancreas 180
B Brunner Gland Lesions 181
C Adenoma 183
D Lipoma and Hemangioma 184
32 Malignant Tumors of the Small Bowel 187
Francis J. Scholz and Peter E. Humphrey
A Adenocarcinoma of the Small Bowel 187
B Lymphoma of the Small Bowel 189
C Carcinoid Tumor of the Small Bowel 191
D Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor 193
E Metastases 195
Section IV: Appendix
33 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
Mark Knox and Koenraad J. Mortele
A Appendiceal Carcinoid Tumors 209
B Appendiceal Mucinous Cystadenoma 211
37 Inflammatory Bowel Disease 223
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
39 Infectious Colitis 236
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
41 Benign Colonic Polyps 247
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
42 Colonic Adenocarcinoma 252
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
Trang 1243 Colonic Obstruction 257
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
44 Colonic Volvulus 260
Richard M. Gore, Kiran H. Thakrar, Geraldine M. Newmark, Uday K. Mehta, and Jonathan W. Berlin
Section VI: Anorectum
45 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
of the Anorectum 265
Koenraad J. Mortele
46 Retrorectal Developmental Cysts 271
Max J. Lahaye, Geerard L. Beets, Regina G. H Beets-Tan, and Angela D. Levy
47 Perianal Fistula 274
Jaap Stoker
48 Rectal Adenocarcinoma 280
Benjamin M. Yeh and Koenraad J. Mortele
49 Other Anorectal Neoplasms 285
Angela D. Levy and Koenraad J. Mortele
50 Posterior Compartment of the Pelvic Floor 290
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude
B. Sirlin
53 Disorders of Iron Overload 316
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude
B. Sirlin
54 Cirrhosis 323
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude
B. Sirlin
55 Other Metabolic Disorders 330
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude B. Sirlin
C Liver Infarct 342
57 Portal Vein Disorders 345
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude B. Sirlin
A Bland Thrombosis 345
B Tumoral Thrombosis 348
58 Veno-Occlusive Disorders 354
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude
B. Sirlin
59 Liver Transplantation 361
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, Guilherme Moura
da Cunha, Jin-Young Choi, and Claude
B. Sirlin
A Pre–liver Transplantation Evaluation 361
B Post–liver Transplantation Complications 363
Section VIII: Focal Liver Disease
60 Cystic Hepatic Tumors 371
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
A Simple Hepatic Cysts and Polycystic Liver Disease 371
B Biliary Cystadenoma and Cystadenocarcinoma 374
C Von Meyenberg Complexes 376
61 Benign Liver Tumors 379
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
A Benign and Premalignant Liver Nodules in the Cirrhotic Liver 397
Trang 1363 Uncommon Solid Liver Tumors 413
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
64 Secondary Liver Tumors 419
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
66 THEDs: THADs and THIDs 436
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
67 Trauma 443
Jin-Young Choi, Guilherme Moura da Cunha, Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, and Claude B. Sirlin
Section IX: Gallbladder
68 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
A Acute Calculous Cholecystitis 453
B Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis 456
G Gallbladder Perforation and Gallstone Ileus 467
72 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
of the Bile Ducts 481
So Yeon Kim, En-Haw Wu, and Benjamin M. Yeh
73 Developmental and Congenital Disorders of the Bile Duct 484
So Yeon Kim, En-Haw Wu, and Benjamin M. Yeh
A Bile Duct Anatomic Variants 484
B Obstructed or Excluded Bile Ducts 515
C Bile Duct Leak 516
Section XI: Pancreas
78 Normal Anatomy and Imaging Techniques
B Congenital and Genetic Diseases 530
C Other Pancreatic Variants and Pitfalls 532
Trang 14C Serous Microcystic Adenoma 556
D Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor 558
83 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 560
Koenraad J. Mortele
84 Other Solid Pancreatic Tumors 565
Koenraad J. Mortele and Angela D. Levy
A Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors 565
B Rare Solid Pancreatic Tumors 569
C Secondary Pancreatic Tumors 571
85 Pancreatic Surgery/Transplant 575
Koenraad J. Mortele and Angela D. Levy
A The Postoperative Pancreas 575
103 Familial Adenomatous Polyposis 679
David Reynolds, Grant Lattin, and Darcy J. Wolfman
Trang 15108 Von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome 697
Grant Lattin and Darcy J. Wolfman
Trang 16We are privileged to practice radiology and abdominal
imag-ing in an era that includes classic radiologic techniques—such
as radiography, fluoroscopy, and nuclear medicine—as well
as modern state-of the-art high-resolution ultrasound,
multidetector computed tomography, magnetic resonance
imaging, positron emission tomography computed
tomog-raphy, and the advanced postprocessing techniques that
can be applied to these imaging data The combination of
these diagnostic radiologic and imaging modalities makes
it possible to provide the most accurate and comprehensive
diagnostic information to patients and their physicians in
a manner that allows for the optimal treatment and
man-agement of gastrointestinal diseases However, for those
learning and practicing radiology and abdominal imaging,
the amount of information they must acquire about these
diseases can be overwhelming Furthermore, it has been
difficult to find a relatively short single-volume reference
that concisely encapsulates the most important clinical
and pathologic information on gastrointestinal diseases as
well as all of the radiologic and imaging modalities used to
study them
Therefore the goal of our textbook is to provide a prehensive but easy-to-read resource that highlights the
com-most important clinical, pathologic, radiologic, and
imag-ing manifestations of gastrointestinal diseases It is
pri-marily designed to be used during training on radiology
rotations where gastrointestinal diseases are imaged and
to place diagnostic considerations into clinical context
Because all radiologic and imaging modalities are
dis-cussed with each disease, this textbook can be used during
fluoroscopy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance
imaging, and ultrasound rotations; for exam preparation; and as a reference by practicing radiologists
As part of the Rotations in Radiology series,
Gastrointestinal Imaging provides a comprehensive review
of gastrointestinal diseases through its organization by organ and disease The book is organized into sections that cover all of the hollow and solid gastrointestinal organs, the peritoneal cavity and abdominal wall; finally, there is
a multisystem section that covers diseases affecting tiple organs and organ systems Each major section con-tains a chapter on normal anatomy, imaging techniques, and principles of interpretation for each specified organ For each disease, a concise definition and summary of the clinical, pathologic, and imaging manifestations is pro-vided, followed by a bulleted differential diagnosis that highlights the differences between diseases, a summary
mul-of key points, and a brief review mul-of current management The chapters are heavily illustrated with images that show the most important radiologic and imaging features Anatomic illustrations highlight the key anatomical fea-tures that are important for understanding imaging con-cepts and disease classification
All chapters are authored by internationally known radiologists who have published authoritative works in their fields of expertise We greatly thank them for taking the time
to contribute to this book It is essential that they pass their knowledge and expertise on to those using this textbook who are in residency training, studying for exams, or simply referencing material for clinical practice In short, this text provides the most current imaging concepts and theory for the wide range of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract
Trang 18Geerard L. Beets, MD, PhD
Professor of Surgery
Department of Surgery
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, The Netherlands
Regina G. H Beets-Tan, MD, PhD
Professor of Radiology
Department of Radiology
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, The Netherlands
Guilherme Moura da Cunha, MD
Liver Imaging Group
Dept of Radiology
University of California
San Diego, California
Clinica de Diagnostico por Imagem - CDPI
Evanston HospitalEvanston, Illinois
Peter E. Humphrey, MD
Northwest ImagingKalispell Regional Medical CenterKalispell, Montana
Beatriz C Baranski Kaniak, MD
Liver Imaging GroupDepartment of RadiologyUniversity of California, San Diego
VA Healthcare SystemSan Diego, California
Jonathan Keung, MD
Department of RadiologyWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesday, Maryland
So Yeon Kim, MD
Department of Radiology and Research Institute
of RadiologyUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineAsan Medical Center
Seoul, Korea
Mark Knox, MBBCh, BAO
Department of Radiology
St James’s HospitalDublin, Ireland
Max J. Lahaye, MD, PhD
Department of RadiologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastricht, The Netherlands
Grant Lattin, MD
Assistant Professor of RadiologyDepartment of RadiologyUniformed Services UniversityBethesda, Maryland
Trang 19Université Libre de Bruxelles
Erasme University Hospital
Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBurlington, Massachusetts
Claude B. Sirlin, MD
Liver Imaging GroupDepartment of RadiologyUniversity of California, San DiegoSan Diego, California
Jaap Stoker, MD
Professor of RadiologyDepartment of RadiologyAcademisch Medisch CentrumUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdam, The Netherlands
Eric Sturgill, MD
Department of RadiologyNaval Medical Center PortsmouthPortsmouth, Virginia
Kiran H. Thakrar, MD
Professor of RadiologyChief GI RadiologyDepartment of RadiologyNorth Shore University Health SystemUniversity of Chicago
Evanston HospitalEvanston, Illinois
Darcy J. Wolfman, MD
Assistant Professor of RadiologyUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesDepartment of Radiology
Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesda, Maryland
En-Haw Wu, MD
UCSF Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingChang Gung Memorial Hospital
Linkou, Taiwan
Trang 20Pharynx and Esophagus
Trang 22Normal Anatomy and Imaging
Techniques of the Pharynx and
Esophagus
Marc S. Levine
Introduction
Pharyngoesophagography is a valuable technique for
dem-onstrating a wide range of functional and structural lesions
of the pharynx and esophagus The pharyngeal portion of
the study enables evaluation of swallowing dysfunction
as well as a variety of morphologic abnormalities in the
pharynx The esophageal portion is equally valuable for
detecting esophageal dysmotility, gastroesophageal reflux
disease, infectious esophagitis, esophageal carcinoma, and
other morphologic abnormalities of the esophagus
Pharynx
Pharyngeal Examination
The oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing function are
evaluated by having the patient initially swallow a bolus of
high-density barium; the patient is then viewed in the
fron-tal and lateral positions If the patient is unable to stand,
he or she may be placed in a speech therapy chair for this
examination Video or DVD recordings of swallowing are
obtained and later reviewed in slow motion to carefully
assess all phases of swallowing Spot images of the
phar-ynx are also obtained, again with the patient in frontal and
lateral positions, during suspended respiration and
phona-tion to assess for structural abnormalities of the pharynx
(Figure 1-1) Phonation expands the pharyngeal lumen,
sometimes permitting the detection of findings that are not
visible when the pharynx is collapsed (see Figure 1-1A and
B) If a Zenker’s diverticulum, cervical esophageal
stric-ture, or tumor is suspected, rapid-sequence imaging may
be performed to better assess the cervical esophagus and
pharyngoesophageal junction Modified barium swallows
use various consistencies of barium to assess the presence
and degree of laryngeal penetration or aspiration in patients
who are at risk for aspiration or have known swallowing
dif-ficulties These modified swallows are usually performed in
conjunction with speech pathologists who can employ a
variety of compensatory strategies (e.g., placing the head in
a chin-tuck position) to improve swallowing function
Normal Pharyngeal Anatomy
The pharynx, a tube composed of skeletal muscle, has a squamous epithelial lining The oropharynx extends in a craniocaudad direction from the soft palate to the pharyngo-epiglottic folds The anterior wall of the oropharynx extends
to the base of the tongue, and the posterior wall abuts the upper cervical spine The hypopharynx is the portion of the pharynx that is associated with the larynx The hypophar-ynx extends craniocaudally from the pharyngoepiglottic folds to the pharyngoesophageal segment (Figure 1-2)
The anterior wall of the hypopharynx is formed by the epiglottic and arytenoid cartilages, piriform sinuses, and surrounding thyroid cartilage The posterior wall of the hypopharynx is bordered by the cervical spine The crico-pharyngeus muscle forms the junction of the pharynx and esophagus, also termed the pharyngoesophageal segment
The palatine fossae are bounded by the anterior and posterior tonsillar pillars, also known as the paired palato-glossal and palatopharyngeal folds The vertical surface of the tongue is nodular because of the underlying circumval-late papillae and lingual tonsil The valleculae are potential spaces created by a fold of tissue that extends posteriorly to the epiglottis (the median glossoepiglottic fold) The vallecu-lae disappear when the epiglottis inverts during swallowing
The piriform sinuses form the anterior portion of the lower hypopharynx They are pear-shaped spaces created
by protrusion of the larynx into the pharynx These spaces are open posteriorly to the remainder of the hypopharynx The aryepiglottic folds and mucosa overlying the muscu-lar process of the arytenoid cartilages form the medial boundaries of the piriform sinuses
Normal Pharyngeal Function
Swallowing is arbitrarily divided into four tion and bolus preparation, (2) the oral phase, (3) the pha-ryngeal phase, and (4) the esophageal phase During the oral phase, a bolus is selected and brought to the lips by volitional activity A liquid is sucked or poured into the mouth A solid
phases: (1) inges-is placed on top of the tongue Liquids do not require much oral manipulation and therefore are easily transferred to the
Trang 23oropharynx In contrast, solids must be chewed and mixed
with saliva to achieve a satisfactory consistency for
swallow-ing Once the bolus is prepared, the tongue collects and sizes
the bolus and transfers it into the oropharynx The tongue
tip rises to appose the hard palate, and the midtongue forms
an inclined plane that directs the bolus into the oropharynx The velopharyngeal portal is closed as the soft palate rises to appose the posterior pharyngeal wall, and the superior con-strictor muscle contracts to appose the soft palate
Epiglottic tilt is accomplished by contraction of the suprahyoid muscles, thyrohyoid muscle, and intrinsic epiglottic muscles Elevation of the hyoid bone by the suprahyoid muscle group pulls on the hyoepiglottic liga-ment attached to the lower portion of the epiglottic carti-lage Hyoid elevation tilts the upper epiglottis toward the horizontal in a fulcrum-like motion Contraction of the aryepiglottic and oblique arytenoid muscles and thyroepi-glottic muscles then inverts the epiglottis
The epiglottis acts as a stream diverter, directing the bolus into the lateral swallowing channels The tilting epi-glottis also helps cover the laryngeal vestibule The larynx closes in a retrograde fashion; the true vocal cords close at the beginning of the swallow, followed by the false vocal cords and remainder of the laryngeal vestibule A portion of the bolus that has entered the laryngeal vestibule therefore is pushed back into the hypopharynx by retrograde laryngeal closure The bolus flows through the pharynx by a combi-nation of gravity, elevation of the pharynx over the bolus, tongue push, and sequential contraction of the constrictor muscles Although the upper esophageal sphincter relaxes at the beginning of a swallow, the pharyngoesophageal segment does not open until the bolus reaches the lower hypopharynx Elevation of the larynx and pharynx pulls the anterior wall
of the pharyngoesophageal segment anteriorly Tongue base retraction, constrictor contraction, and gravity then increase bolus pressure to open the pharyngoesophageal segment
Figure 1-1 Double-contrast images of the pharynx (A) Lateral spot image of the pharynx during suspended respiration shows the normal anatomy of the pharynx (B) Repeat lateral spot image of the pharynx during phonation better distends the pharynx, showing enlarged palatine tonsils (small black arrows) (C) Frontal spot image of the pharynx during suspended respiration also shows the palatine tonsils (small black arrows) indenting the lateral walls of the pharynx (Large black arrows denote epiglottis, large white arrows denote valleculae, and small white arrows denote piriform sinuses.)
Figure 1-2 Normal pharyngeal anatomy The pharynx
is composed of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and
hypopharynx The hypopharynx extends craniocaudally from
the pharyngoepiglottic folds to the pharyngoesophageal
segment The pharyngoesopheal segment forms the junction
between the hypopharynx and the esophagus
Trang 24Esophageal Examination
Barium esophagograms are generally performed as
bipha-sic examinations that include both upright double-contrast
views with a high-density barium suspension and prone
single-contrast views with a low-density barium
suspen-sion The patient first ingests an effervescent agent and
then rapidly gulps high-density barium in the upright left
posterior oblique (LPO) position, in which double-contrast
views of the esophagus are obtained (Figure 1-3) The
patient is then placed in a recumbent right-side-down position for double-contrast views of the gastric cardia and fundus (Figure 1-4)
After the double-contrast phase of the examination is completed, the patient is placed in the prone right ante-rior oblique position and asked to take discrete swallows
of a low-density barium suspension to evaluate esophageal motility Esophageal dysmotility is thought to be present when abnormal peristalsis is detected on two or more of five separate swallows The patient then rapidly gulps the low-density barium suspension to optimally distend the esophagus (particularly the distal esophagus) in order to rule out rings or strictures that could be missed on the double-contrast portion of the examination (Figure 1-5) Finally, the patient is turned from a supine to a right lateral position to assess for spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux
or reflux induced by a Valsalva maneuver or water-siphon test The water-siphon test is performed with the patient
in a supine right posterior oblique position The distal esophagus is observed fluoroscopically while the patient takes several swallows of water If reflux is identified, the height of the refluxed barium column and clearance time should be noted
Barium tablets with a standard diameter of 12.5 mm are useful for the detection of subtle esophageal stric-tures in patients with dysphagia While in an upright or near upright position, the patient should swallow the tab-let with water Normally the tablet will pass through the esophagus in less than 20 seconds
Figure 1-3 Normal double-contrast view of the esophagus
with the patient in an upright left-posterior-oblique position
Note the smooth, featureless appearance of the esophageal
mucosa en face
Figure 1-4 Normal gastric cardia A lateral right-side-down
view of the gastric fundus shows the cardiac rosette as
multiple stellate folds radiating to a central point (arrow) at
the gastroesophageal junction
Figure 1-5 Normal single-contrast view of the esophagus with the patient in a prone right-anterior-oblique position Prone views are best for optimally distending the esophagus
Trang 25Normal Esophageal Anatomy
On double-contrast views, the esophagus normally
has a smooth, featureless appearance en face and a thin
white etching where it is seen in profile (see Figure 1-3)
Occasionally collapsed or partially collapsed views (also
known as mucosal relief views) may show the normal
longitudinal folds as thin, straight, delicate structures no
more than 1 to 2 mm in width
The gastric cardia can often be recognized by the ence of three or four stellate folds that radiate to a cen-
pres-tral point at the gastroesophageal junction, also known as
the cardiac rosette (see Figure 1-4) In some patients with
tumor involving the cardia, these lesions may be manifest
by distortion, effacement, or obliteration of this normal
anatomic landmark
Normal Esophageal Motility
Esophageal motility is best evaluated with the patient in
the prone or right anterior oblique recumbent position,
so as to negate the effect of gravity After the pharyngeal
phase of swallowing, barium enters the esophagus through
a relaxed upper esophageal sphincter The normal primary
peristaltic wave propagates toward the stomach, effacing
the esophageal lumen as it progressively strips the barium
bolus from the esophagus through a relaxed lower
esopha-geal sphincter into the gastric fundus At fluoroscopy, the
peristaltic wave has an inverted-V shape at the top of the
barium column The primary wave is sometimes disrupted
at or near the level of the aortic arch, with retrograde
pas-sage of a small amount of barium proximally as a normal
finding in older patients This phenomenon is also known
as proximal escape Esophageal dysmotility disorders may
be characterized by weakened or absent primary
peristal-sis, prolonged transit time greater than 30 seconds, large
amounts of proximal escape, or to-and-fro motion of the
barium column; it is sometimes associated with a variable
number of nonperistaltic contractions or lower esophageal
sphincterdysfunction
Suspected Aspiration or Perforation
If there is concern that a patient may aspirate
dur-ing a fluoroscopic examination, barium or a nonionic
water-soluble contrast agent should be used because ionic
water-soluble contrast agents have high osmolality and
therefore draw fluid into the lungs when aspirated,
plac-ing the patient at risk for severe, even life-threatenplac-ing
is identified, the examination should immediately be repeated with barium because barium is denser and more radiopaque and is better at defining small, subtle perfora-tions that are likely to be missed with water-soluble con-trast agents
Key Points
■ Fluoroscopic examination of the pharynx enables evaluation of the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing as well as the anatomic structures of the pharynx
■ Barium esophagograms are performed as biphasic studies to evaluate the esophageal mucosa, anatomy, and motility
■ Barium or a nonionic water-soluble contrast material
is the preferred contrast agent in patients who are at risk for aspiration
■ A water-soluble contrast agent should be employed
as the initial contrast medium in patients with pected perforation If no leak is detected with a water-soluble contrast agent, the examination should immediately be repeated with barium to rule out subtle leaks that might otherwise be missed
sus-Further Reading
Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA Physiology and ogy of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing
radiol-AJR 1990;154:953–963.
Donner MW, Bosma JF, Robertson DL Anatomy and physiology
of the pharynx Gastrointest Radiol 1985;10:196–212.
Herlinger H, Grossman R, Laufer I, et al The gastric
car-dia in double-contrast study: its dynamic image AJR
Rubesin SE Pharynx: normal anatomy and examination
techniques In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology 3rd ed Philadelphia, Pa: WB
Saunders, 2008:235–252.
Trang 26Pharyngeal Disorders
Marc S. Levine
Neuromuscular Disorders
Most patients with swallowing dysfunction have neural or
muscular disorders that alter the timing of events or
mus-cular contraction in the oropharynx rather than causing
structural damage Cerebrovascular accidents are among
the most common causes of neuromuscular dysfunction
About one fourth of patients with strokes have dysphagia
In general, left-sided strokes alter the oral phase of
swal-lowing, whereas right-sided strokes alter the pharyngeal
phase The corticobulbar pathways in the internal
cap-sule may be damaged by large hemispheric strokes or
small-vessel disease Acute strokes or small-vessel
dis-ease—resulting from hypertension, diabetes, or other
causes—can also affect the swallowing center in the pons
and medulla
Diseases that directly damage motor neurons in the swallowing center or cranial nerves in the skull base may
cause bulbar palsy, with oral and pharyngeal swallowing
difficulties Destruction of lower motor neurons occurs in
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and in 10% of patients with
acute poliomyelitis The latter patients may have
progres-sive disintegration of axon terminals in surviving but
overworked residual motor neurons, with pharyngeal
weakness due to postpolio muscular atrophy Unilateral
pharyngeal paresis is often caused by destruction of motor
nerves at the skull base or in the neck from tumor, trauma,
or surgery Abnormal transmission at the myoneural
junc-tion in myasthenia gravis may cause dysphagia, which is
exacerbated by prolonged swallowing
Dysphagia from inflammatory or endocrine-related myopathies is potentially treatable Dermatomyositis and
polymyositis directly damage intrinsic or extrinsic
mus-cles of the pharynx Pharyngeal muscle myopathy may
be caused by a variety of endocrine disorders, including
hyper- or hypothyroidism and Cushing’s syndrome
The end result of these various neuromuscular ders is poor timing of oral and pharyngeal events or abnor-
disor-mal oropharyngeal movement A bolus may be directed
normally but still enter the larynx or vestibule because
of poor timing Laryngeal penetration is defined as
pas-sage of the bolus into the laryngeal vestibule just before or
during swallowing Abnormal tongue motion, pharyngeal
contraction, or epiglottic tilt may also lead to laryngeal
penetration Abnormal oral or pharyngeal movement may
result from a structural abnormality or neuromuscular disorder Abnormal epiglottic tilt or pharyngeal muscular contraction may also lead to stasis in the valleculae or pir-iform sinuses respectively Marked stasis in the piriform sinuses may cause the retained bolus to overflow into the larynx through the interarytenoid notch after swallowing Thus overflow aspiration is defined as retained barium in the valleculae or piriform sinuses overflowing into the laryngeal vestibule while the patient is breathing nor-mally Aspiration may also result from the regurgitation
of esophageal contents into the pharynx
Structural Disorders
Lymphoid Hyperplasia
Lymphoid hyperplasia of the lingual or palatine tonsils
is a nonspecific response to aging, allergies, and repeated infections Lymphoid hyperplasia of the lingual tonsil at the posteroinferior tongue base may appear on barium studies as multiple small, smooth-surfaced, ovoid nod-ules symmetrically distributed over the vertical surface
of the tongue base, often extending into the valleculae and vallecular surface of the epiglottis When this lym-phoid hyperplasia is focal or mass-like, it can mimic the appearance of tumor at the base of the tongue (Figure 2-1) Therefore patients with asymmetric nodularity or mass lesions at the tongue base should undergo further investi-gation to differentiate lymphoid hyperplasia of the lingual tonsil from malignant tumor
Pharyngeal and Cervical Esophageal Webs
Webs are thin folds that usually arise from the anterior wall
of the proximal cervical esophagus or geal segment Cervical esophageal webs are common findings of uncertain etiology An association with gastro-esophageal reflux disease has been reported Asymmetric scarring of the cervical esophagus from radiation or other causes can also lead to the development of webs
pharyngoesopha-Webs are thin (1 to 2 mm in thickness) folds arising from the anterior wall of the pharyngoesophageal seg-ment or proximal cervical esophagus A web may appear
on barium studies as a radiolucent bar in the barium pool
or as a thin structure etched in white by barium Some
Trang 27webs extend circumferentially, with a deeper shelf on
their anterior surface (Figure 2-2A) Patients with
dys-phagia usually have webs that compromise the lumen of
the cervical esophagus by more than 50% Obstruction is
manifest by dilatation of the cervical esophagus above the
web or a so-called jet phenomenon in which a thin column
of barium is seen spurting through the web (Figure 2-2B)
Benign Cysts and Tumors
Retention cysts are common benign lesions found at the tongue base or in the valleculae, piriform sinuses, and aryepiglottic folds These cysts are lined by squamous epithelium and filled with desquamated debris They typ-ically appear on barium studies as smooth-surfaced hemi-spheric masses that protrude into the pharyngeal lumen (Figure 2-3) Granular cell tumors, ectopic thyroid tissue, and thyroglossal duct cysts may occasionally be manifest
by similar findings at the base of the tongue
Benign pharyngeal tumors such as lipomas, bromas, hamartomas, and oncocytomas are uncommon Like retention cysts, these tumors may appear on barium studies as smooth submucosal masses protruding into the pharyngeal lumen
neurofi-Squamous Cell Carcinoma
In the United States, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, pharynx, and larynx is five times more common than squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus Ninety percent of these tumors are nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinomas Almost all of these lesions develop in moderate or heavy abusers of alcohol, tobacco, or both The signs, symptoms, treatment, and prognosis depend on the location of the tumor in the pharynx Most patients have a recent onset of symptoms, including hoarseness and dysphagia The overall 5-year survival rate for these patients is 20% to 40%
The radiographic findings of squamous cell carcinoma
of the pharynx are similar to those of malignant tumors elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract The normal contour
of the involved structure is disrupted by a protrusion into the lumen or by an area of ulceration extending outside the expected luminal contour (Figure 2-4) Intraluminal
Figure 2-1 Lymphoid hyperplasia of lingual tonsil Lateral
spot image of the pharynx shows focal lobulation of the
posteroinferior tongue base and adjacent valleculae
(arrows) due to lymphoid hyperplasia of the lingual tonsil This
appearance could be mistaken for a polypoid carcinoma of
the tongue base
Figure 2-2 Cervical esophageal web (A) Lateral spot image of the cervical esophagus during swallowing shows a thin, smooth, circumferential area of narrowing (arrow) due to a cervical esophageal web (B) Frontal spot image during swallowing shows a jet phenomenon (arrow) due to barium spurting through the narrowed segment of the web
Trang 28tumor can appear on a scout view as an area of increased
soft tissue radiopacity replacing the normally air-filled
lumen or, after oral barium, as a radiolucent filling defect
in the barium pool The irregular mucosal surface of the tumor may show a granular, nodular, ulcerated, or lobu-lated contour or by barium-etched lines in an unexpected configuration or location The distensibility and mobility
of the involved structure may also be compromised
The palatine tonsil is the most common site of involvement by squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx Tonsillar tumors can spread to the posterior pharyngeal wall, soft palate, and base of the tongue Lymph node metastases are found in about 50% of patients Squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue base are usually advanced tumors that have already spread deep into the intrinsic
or extrinsic muscles of the tongue These tumors can also invade the palatine tonsils, valleculae, or pharyngoepi-glottic folds Lymph node metastases are present in about 70% of patients
The supraglottic laryngeal structures tis, aryepiglottic folds, mucosa overlying the muscular process of the arytenoid cartilages, false vocal cords, and laryngeal ventricle) arise from the pharyngobuc-cal anlage, forming a portion of the anterior wall of the hypopharynx Supraglottic cancers are often clas-sified as a subtype of laryngeal rather than pharyngeal tumors These lesions frequently cause coughing and choking The supraglottic region has an extensive lym-phatic bed; supraglottic cancers therefore tend to spread throughout the supraglottic region into the preepiglot-tic space Cervical lymphadenopathy is detected in one third to one half of patients
(epiglot-Squamous cell carcinomas of the piriform sinuses are usually bulky masses that, in 70% to 80% of patients, have already spread to lymph nodes at the time of presenta-tion Tumors of the medial piriform sinus may invade the ipsilateral aryepiglottic fold, arytenoid and cricoid carti-lage, and paraglottic space, often resulting in hoarseness Tumors of the lateral piriform sinus may invade the thy-roid cartilage, thyrohyoid membrane, and neck, including the carotid sheath
Squamous cell carcinomas of the posterior pharyngeal wall are large, bulky tumors that cause few symptoms, often presenting as painless neck masses resulting from metasta-ses to cervical lymph nodes More than half of these patients have lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis These exophytic tumors may spread superiorly or inferiorly into the nasopharynx or cervical esophagus, respectively, and posteriorly into the retropharyngeal space
Lymphoma
About 10% of pharyngeal malignancies are non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas arising in the lymphoid tissue of Waldeyer’s ring, including the adenoids, palatine tonsils, and lingual tonsil Hodgkin’s disease involving the pharynx is uncom-mon, even though Hodgkin’s disease is often first detected
in cervical lymph nodes Patients with pharyngeal phoma frequently present with a neck mass, and cervical lymph nodes are initially involved in 60% of cases
lym-Figure 2-3 Benign retention cyst Frontal spot image of
the pharynx shows a small (5 mm in diameter), smooth
submucosal lesion (arrow) arising from the superior aspect
of the right piriform sinus due to a benign retention cyst
Figure 2-4 Carcinoma of the pharynx Frontal spot image of
the pharynx shows an advanced ulcerated carcinoma (black
arrows) obliterating the left piriform sinus Note that the tumor
mass extends into the right piriform sinus (white arrows)
Trang 29The palatine tonsil is the primary site of involvement
by pharyngeal lymphoma in 40% to 60% of patients, the
nasopharynx in 18% to 28%, and the lingual tonsil in 10%
Multiple sites are involved in about 25% of patients, but the
hypopharynx is rarely involved by this tumor Pharyngeal
lymphomas typically appear on barium studies as large,
bulky, lobulated masses Nevertheless the mucosal surface
may be relatively smooth because of the submucosal
loca-tion of these tumors
Radiation Change
Patients with carcinoma of the larynx or pharynx are
com-monly treated with radiation therapy Chronic radiation
injury to the pharynx is characterized by vascular
dam-age with mucosal atrophy and fibrosis of muscle and
sub-mucosal tissue Radiation edema and fibrosis appears on
barium studies as a smooth, bulbous enlargement of the
epiglottis, smooth thickening of the aryepiglottic folds,
flattening and truncation of the valleculae, and atrophy
of the soft palate (Figure 2-5) Radiation fibrosis leads to
decreased or absent epiglottic tilt and poor closure of the
laryngeal vestibule with laryngeal penetration (see Figure 2-5) Paresis of the constrictor muscles may result in poor clearance from the hypopharynx with overflow aspiration
Further Reading
Apter AJ, Levine MS, Glick SN Carcinomas of the base of the tongue: diagnosis using double-contrast radiography of the
pharynx Radiology 1984;151:123–126.
Ekberg O, Nylander G Double contrast examination of the
pharynx Gastrointest Radiol 1985;10:263–271.
Gordon AR, Levine MS, Redfern RO, et al Cervical
esopha-geal webs: association with gastroesophaesopha-geal reflux Abdom Imaging 2001;26:574–577.
Gromet M, Homer MJ, Carter BL Lymphoid hyperplasia at the
base of the tongue Radiology 1982;144:825–828.
Quillen SP, Balfe DM, Glick SN Pharyngography after head and neck irradiation: differentiation of postirradiation edema
from recurrent tumor AJR 1993;161:1205–1208.
Rubesin SE, Glick SN The tailored double-contrast
pharyngo-gram Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1988;28:133–179.
Rubesin SE, Laufer I Pictorial review: principles of double
con-trast pharyngography Dysphagia 1991;6:170–178.
Trang 30Achalasia is a motility disorder characterized by absent
pri-mary peristalsis in the body of the esophagus and decreased
relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) There
are two types: primary and secondary Primary achalasia
is an idiopathic form of achalasia caused by degeneration
of esophageal ganglion cells in Auerbach’s plexus, whereas
secondary achalasia is an acquired condition caused by
neoplastic or infectious infiltration of the ganglion cells
Demographic and Clinical Features
Primary achalasia typically occurs in young or
middle-aged adults who present with long-standing
dysphagia that slowly progresses over a period of years
Affected individual are usually able to maintain their
weight by modifying their diets, even in advanced disease
In contrast, secondary achalasia is most frequently caused
by malignant tumors involving the gastroesophageal
junc-tion; therefore affected patients tend to be elderly
individ-uals (over 60 years of age) who present with a recent onset
of dysphagia (less than 6 months) and weight loss Thus it
is usually possible to differentiate these conditions on the
basis of the clinical history and presentation
Pathology
Primary achalasia is an idiopathic condition resulting from
the degeneration of ganglion cells in the distal esophagus
and at the gastroesophageal junction In contrast,
second-ary achalasia is an acquired condition caused by malignant
tumor in North America and by Chagas disease in South
America Many patients with secondary achalasia have
tumor that directly infiltrates the gastroesophageal
junc-tion, destroying the ganglion cells in this region In North
America, as many as 75% of patients with secondary
acha-lasia are found to have a carcinoma of the cardia or fundus
as the cause of this condition Carcinoma of the lung, breast,
and pancreas and other malignant tumors can also
metas-tasize to the gastroesophageal junction, causing secondary
achalasia Other patients may develop secondary achalasia
because of tumor involving the vagus nerve, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, or brain stem Still other patients have tumors that secrete a vasoactive substance, producing
a paraneoplastic syndrome that mimics achalasia
Imaging Features
Primary achalasia is characterized on barium studies by a dilated, flaccid esophagus with absent primary peristalsis and tapered, beaklike narrowing of the distal esophagus at
or directly adjacent to the gastroesophageal junction due
to incomplete opening of the LES (Figure 3-1) In advanced disease, the esophagus can become massively dilated and
have a tortuous distal configuration (also known as a
sig-moid esophagus) (Figure 3-2) Barium studies typically
reveal a standing column of barium in the thoracic agus with markedly delayed emptying into the stomach Some patients with achalasia have associated nonperistal-tic contractions of varying severity in the esophagus, a
esoph-condition known as vigorous achalasia.
Secondary achalasia is also characterized on barium studies by absent peristalsis and beak-like narrowing of the distal esophagus (Figure 3-3) In secondary achalasia, how-ever, the esophagus is much less dilated because of rapid progression of disease Moreover, in secondary achalasia, the length of the narrowed segment is often considerably greater than that in primary achalasia because of spread of tumor into the distal esophagus (see Figure 3-3) The nar-rowed distal esophagus may also be asymmetric, nodular,
or ulcerated because of underlying tumor in this region
In patients with secondary achalasia caused by mary carcinoma of the cardia, barium studies may reveal other signs of malignant tumor, with an ulcerated, pol-ypoid, or infiltrating lesion in the cardia and fundus In patients with markedly delayed emptying of barium from the esophagus, the stomach paradoxically may empty more rapidly than it fills, limiting evaluation of the cardia and fundus In such cases, the patient can be asked to sip additional barium in a recumbent, left-side-down position
pri-to facilitate radiologic evaluation of the proximal spri-tomach
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest can also be
a useful imaging test for differentiating primary from ondary achalasia In primary achalasia, CT typically reveals
sec-a dilsec-ated esophsec-agus with distsec-al nsec-arrowing sec-and no evidence
Trang 31of esophageal wall thickening or mediastinal adenopathy
In secondary achalasia, however, CT may reveal marked thickening of the distal esophagus, an eccentric soft tissue mass at the gastric cardia, and mediastinal adenopathy
Differential Diagnosis
■ Peptic stricture: A tapered peptic stricture in the tal esophagus may resemble achalasia but primary peristalsis is preserved, and peptic strictures are almost always associated with hiatal hernias
dis-■ Extrinsic compression by an ectatic or aneurysmal descending thoracic aorta: This indentation may also cause tapered narrowing of the distal esophagus, but the dilated aorta will displace the distal esophagus and is often calcified and esophageal peristalsis is preserved
Common Variants
When left-posterior-oblique double-contrast radiographs are obtained in the upright position, some patients may experience transient spasm of the LES, seen as a tapered narrowing of the distal esophagus that is indistinguish-able from the narrowing in achalasia In such cases, how-ever, the distal esophagus opens normally and primary peristalsis is normal on prone right-anterior oblique
Figure 3-1 Primary achalasia Upright double-contrast view
of the esophagus shows tapered, beak-like narrowing of the
distal esophagus (arrow) due to incomplete opening of the
LES, with a standing column of barium proximally and slow
emptying of barium into the stomach There was no primary
peristalsis in the body of the esophagus at fluoroscopy This
constellation of findings is characteristic of achalasia
Figure 3-2 Advanced primary achalasia with sigmoid
esophagus This patient has a massively dilated esophagus
with a tortuous distal configuration (also known as a sigmoid
esophagus) and considerable retained debris Also note
tapered narrowing of the distal esophagus just above the
gastroesophageal junction (arrow) These findings are
characteristic of long-standing achalasia
Figure 3-3 Advanced gastric carcinoma at the gastric cardia causing secondary achalasia This patient has a longer segment of narrowing and greater angulation than
is typically seen in primary achalasia There is also marked narrowing and irregularity of the proximal stomach due to encasement by an advanced scirrhous carcinoma invading the distal esophagus (arrow), producing an achalasia-like appearance
Trang 32radiographs Affected individuals also have no esophageal
symptoms Transient spasm of the LES in the upright
posi-tion is therefore believed to be a common variant of little
or no clinical importance
Management/Clinical Issues
Patients with primary achalasia may be treated by
botu-linum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation of the LES,
or laparoscopic surgical myotomy for relief of dysphagia
Rarely, patients with end-stage achalasia may require an
esophagogastrectomy and gastric pull-through for
amelio-ration of symptoms In contrast, patients with secondary
achalasia require a tumor workup for diagnosis and staging
of the underlying malignant tumor responsible for their
■ Sigmoid esophagus with end-stage disease
■ No esophageal wall thickening, mass at cardia, or mediastinal adenopathy on CT
■ Treatment with botulinum toxin injection, matic dilatation, or laparoscopic myotomy
pneu-Secondary Achalasia
■ Malignant tumor
■ Elderly patients (over 60 years of age)
■ Recent onset of dysphagia (less than 6 months)
■ Substantial weight loss
■ Less esophageal dilatation
■ Longer segment of distal esophageal narrowing
■ Asymmetry, nodularity, or ulceration of narrowed segment
■ Tumor involving gastric cardia/fundus
■ Esophageal wall thickening, mass at cardia, or astinal adenopathy on CT
medi-■ Need for tumor workup for diagnosis and staging of underlying malignancy
Further Reading
1 Ott DJ Motility disorders of the esophagus In: Gore RM,
Levine MS, eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology 3rd
ed Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders, 2008:323–335.
2 Woodfield CA, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, et al Diagnosis of
primary versus secondary achalasia: reassessment of clinical
and radiographic criteria AJR 2000;175:727–731.
B Diffuse Esophageal Spasm
Definition
Diffuse esophageal spasm is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder characterized by intermittent weaken-ing or absence of primary peristalsis with simultaneous, repetitive nonperistaltic contractions in the esophagus More than 50% of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm have associated dysfunction of the LES; therefore diffuse esophageal spasm and achalasia are thought to represent opposite ends of a spectrum of related motility disorders
Demographic and Clinical Features
Diffuse esophageal spasm is a disease of the elderly; most patients with this condition are over 60 years of age Affected individuals typically present with substernal chest pain, dysphagia, or both The chest pain is thought to be caused by multiple repetitive nonperistaltic contractions
of moderate to marked intensity (i.e., esophageal spasm)
In contrast, the dysphagia is most likely caused by LES dysfunction with incomplete opening of the sphincter—a frequent finding in patients with diffuse esophageal spasm
Pathology
The cause of diffuse esophageal spasm is unknown This condition typically involves the smooth muscle portion of the esophagus at or below the level of the aortic arch In some patients, the esophageal wall may become markedly thick-ened owing to hypertrophy and thickening of the muscula-ris propria As indicated earlier, there is often associated LES dysfunction with incomplete opening of the sphincter, as in patients with achalasia It has therefore been postulated that the latter patients have a transitional form of diffuse esopha-geal spasm that may progress over time to classic achalasia
Imaging Features
Diffuse esophageal spasm appears on esophagography by intermittently weakened or absent primary esophageal peristalsis associated with multiple repetitive nonperistal-tic contractions of varying intensity With severe disease, there may be lumen-obliterating or near lumen-obliterating
nonperistaltic contractions, producing a classic corkscrew
esophagus (Figure 3-4) However, most patients have
non-peristaltic contractions of mild to moderate severity that
do no obliterate the lumen (Figure 3-5) Therefore the absence of a corkscrew esophagus on barium studies in no way excludes this diagnosis The majority of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm also have impaired opening of the LES with the tapered, beak-like narrowing of the distal esophagus typically associated with achalasia (see Figure 3-5) In patients with achalasia, however, primary peri-stalsis is absent on all swallows, whereas in patients with diffuse esophaeal spasm, primary peristalsis is present on
Trang 33some swallows Thus it is possible to differentiate these ditions on the basis of the radiographic findings.
con-Differential Diagnosis
■ Presbyesophagus: A form of esophageal dysmotility associated with aging Barium studies may reveal intermittent weakening or absence of primary peri-stalsis with mild to moderate nonperistaltic con-tractions in the mid- and distal thoracic esophagus but no LES dysfunction These patients are usually asymptomatic, whereas patients with diffuse esoph-ageal spasm present with chest pain, dysphagia, or both
■ Vigorous achalasia: May closely resemble diffuse esophageal spasm with LES dysfunction, but peri-stalsis is absent on all swallows in these patients
Common Variants
More than 50% of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm have a variant of this condition associated with LES dys-function Incomplete opening of the sphincter is seen as a tapered, beak-like narrowing identical to that in patients with achalasia However, other typical radiologic and manometric features of diffuse esophageal spasm enable differentiation from true achalasia
Management/Clinical Issues
When patients with diffuse esophageal spasm present with chest pain because of multiple severe nonperistal-tic contractions in the esophagus, treatment with cal-cium channel blockers or other agents has sometimes been recommended to decrease esophageal spasm, although such treatment has had limited success When these patients present with dysphagia because of incom-plete opening of the LES, however, they usually have a marked clinical response to botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic balloon dilatation, or laparoscopic surgical myotomy
■ Incomplete opening of the LES in most patients
■ Chest pain, dysphagia, or both
■ Chest pain caused by severe nonperistaltic contractions
■ Dysphagia caused by LES dysfunction
■ Calcium channel blockers for treatment of chest pain
■ Botulinum toxin injection or endoscopic dilatation for LES dysfunction
Figure 3-5 Diffuse esophageal spasm with LES dysfunction
Mild-to-moderate nonperistaltic contractions in the lower
third of the thoracic esophagus indicate diffuse esophageal
spasm Beak-like narrowing of the distal esophagus due
to incomplete opening of the LES is also seen (arrow)
Dysfunction of the LES is found on barium students in more
than 50% of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm
Figure 3-4 Diffuse esophageal spasm Severe, near
lumen-obliterating nonperistaltic contractions in the lower
third of the thoracic esophagus produce a corkscrew
appearance Real-time intermittent absence of primary
peristalsis in the thoracic esophagus was also observed
in this patient with typical radiographic findings of diffuse
esophageal spasm
Trang 34Further Reading
1 Ott DJ Motility disorders of the esophagus In: Gore RM,
Levine MS, eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology 3rd
ed Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders, 2008:323–335.
2 Prabhakar A, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, et al Relationship
between diffuse esophageal spasm and lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction on barium studies and manometry in
14 patients AJR 2004;183:409–413.
C Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Definition
Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
often have a distinct form of esophageal dysmotility
char-acterized by intermittently weakened or absent primary
peristalsis in the thoracic esophagus—a finding on barium
studies that should suggest the possibility of underlying
GERD in patients with reflux symptoms
Demographic and Clinical Features
Because this form of esophageal dysmotility occurs in
patients with underlying GERD, affected individuals
typi-cally present with signs and symptoms of reflux, including
heartburn, indigestion, regurgitation, and dysphagia The
presence of this dysmotility may exacerbate the patient’s
reflux symptoms by delaying clearance of refluxed acid from
the esophagus and increasing the degree of esophagitis
Pathology
Some patients with esophageal dysmotility associated
with GERD have underlying reflux esophagitis, whereas
others have gastroesophageal reflux without morphologic
evidence of esophagitis It is therefore uncertain whether
the dysmotility results from weakening of esophageal
peristalsis by refluxed acid in the esophagus or from actual
inflammation of the distal esophagus due to reflux
esoph-agitis Whatever the explanation, abnormal peristalsis in
patients with GERD impairs clearance of refluxed acid
from the esophagus, leading to a vicious cycle with
pro-gressively more severe reflux esophagitis
Imaging Features
The esophageal dysmotility of GERD is characterized on
barium studies by variable weakening and/or intermittent
absence of primary peristalsis in the distal or mid- and
dis-tal thoracic esophagus without associated nonperisdis-taltic
contractions The latter observation is particularly helpful
for differentiating this form of dysmotility from that
asso-ciated with aging (i.e., presbyesophagus), in which multiple
nonperistaltic contractions of varying severity are also
detected in the mid- and distal esophagus The presence of abnormal motility without nonperistaltic contractions on barium studies therefore should elicit a careful search for underlying GERD and its sequelae Cricopharyngeal hyper-trophy may also be seen in GERD and appears as a posterior impression at the posterior pharyngoesophageal junction
■ Scleroderma: Appears on barium studies as absent primary peristalsis in the portion of the thoracic esophagus lined by smooth muscle (below the aortic arch); it is due to smooth muscle atrophy and fibrosis
In these patients, however, peristalsis will be absent
Management/Clinical Issues
When the typical dysmotility of GERD is observed on barium studies, patients should probably be treated with proton pump inhibitors for relief of reflux symptoms If a patient’s symptoms fail to improve, 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring may be performed to deter-mine whether the dysmotility is secondary to underlying reflux disease
■ A common radiographic sign of GERD
■ May exacerbate effects of refluxed acid in the esophagus
Trang 35Zenkers diverticulum is a focal mucosal outpouching from
the posterior wall of the lower hypopharynx just above the
cricopharyngeus (i.e., the pharyngoesophageal junction)
In contrast, Killian-Jamieson diverticulum is a focal
muco-sal outpouching from the anterolateral wall of the cervical
esophagus just below the cricopharyngeus
Demographic and Clinical Features
Zenkers diverticulum is most commonly found in elderly
patients who present with dysphagia, halitosis,
regurgita-tion of undigested food, choking, hoarseness, a neck mass,
or recurrent aspiration pneumonias Other patients with
Zenkers diverticulum are asymptomatic Although most
patients with Killian-Jamieson diverticulum are
asymp-tomatic, some may complain of dysphagia Regurgitation
of undigested food and aspiration pneumonia is less
com-mon in these patients because the diverticulum is located
below the cricopharyngeus
Pathology
Zenkers diverticulum is an acquired mucosal herniation
through an area of congenital muscle weakness in the
crico-pharyngeal muscle (also known as Killians dehiscence) just
above the cricopharyngeus This opening is found in about
one-third of people at autopsy and is thought to develop
between the thyropharyngeus and cricopharyngeus
mus-cles or between the oblique and horizontal fibers of the
cricopharyngeus itself The pathogenesis of Zenkers
diver-ticulum is uncertain, but many patients have
cricopharyn-geal dysfunction with elevated upper esophacricopharyn-geal sphincter
pressures and decreased relaxation of the sphincter during
swallowing It has therefore been postulated that
cricopha-ryngeal dysfunction predisposes to the development of a
Zenkers diverticulum In turn, chronic gastroesophageal
reflux disease (GERD) may predispose to the development
of cricopharyngeal dysfunction in these patients
In contrast, a Killian-Jamieson diverticulum is an acquired mucosal herniation through a triangular area
of weakness (also known as the Killian-Jamieson space)
in the anterolateral cervical esophagus just below the copharyngeus The Killian-Jamieson space is bounded superiorly by the inferior border of the cricopharyngeus, anteriorly by the cricoid cartilage, and inferomedially by the suspensory ligament of the esophagus Transient pro-trusions through the Killian-Jamieson space are called
cri-lateral proximal cervical esophageal pouches, whereas
persistent protrusions are called lateral proximal cervical
esophageal diverticula, also known as Killian-Jamieson
pouches and diverticula, respectively
Imaging Features
When detected on barium studies, a Zenkers lum appears on frontal views as a persistent barium-filled sac in the midline below the tips of the piriform sinuses (Figure 4-1A) On lateral views during swallowing, the opening of the Zenkers diverticulum above the incom-pletely opened pharyngoesophageal segment is often surprisingly broad The sac then courses behind the pha-ryngoesophageal segment and proximal cervical esopha-gus (Figure 4-1B) Barium within the diverticulum can be regurgitated into the lower hypopharynx during breath-ing or additional swallowing, but overflow aspiration is relatively uncommon
diverticu-The Killian-Jamieson diverticulum, which is about one third as common as Zenkers diverticulum, has a characteristic radiographic appearance It tends to be uni-lateral (usually on the left) or occasionally bilateral The diverticulum appears on barium studies as a persistent 3–
to 20-mm outpouching with a distinct neck (Figure 4-2) The diverticulum extends lateral to the cervical esophagus
on frontal views (see Figure 4-2) and overlaps the cervical esophagus on lateral views In contrast, Zenkers diver-ticulum is in the midline on frontal views and posterior
to the cervical esophagus on lateral views (see Figure 4-1) When barium is regurgitated from a Killian-Jamieson diverticulum, it enters the cervical esophagus below the cricopharyngeus), so there is less risk of aspiration than
in patients with a Zenkers diverticulum
Trang 36Differential Diagnosis
■ Sealed-off perforation from pharyngoesophageal junction or cervical esophagus
Pitfalls and Mimics
Barium trapped above a prematurely closed or pletely opened cricopharyngeus may resemble a small
incom-Zenkers diverticulum and has been termed a pseudo ‒ Zenkers diverticulum In such patients, however, no diver-
ticulum is seen during swallowing The sac-like structure appears only when the barium is trapped above the cri-copharyngeus after swallowing Within a few moments, this barium usually enters the cervical esophagus and the apparent diverticulum disappears It is not known whether a pseudo‒Zenkers diverticulum can progress to
a true Zenkers diverticulum Early closure and plete opening of the cricopharyngeus has also been asso-ciated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
incom-Management/Clinical Issues
In symptomatic patients, Zenkers diverticulum can be treated by endoscopic diverticulotomy, in which the par-tition between the diverticulum and cervical esophagus
is opened at endoscopy to facilitate emptying from the
Figure 4-1 Zenkers diverticulum (A) Frontal spot image of the pharynx shows a large round diverticulum filled with barium (arrows)
in the midline just below the piriform sinuses (B) Lateral spot image of the pharynx shows the Zenkers diverticulum (white arrows)
arising from a wide neck just above a prominent cricopharyngeus (black arrow) that fails to open normally during swallowing
Note that the diverticulum extends inferiorly, compressing the posterior wall of the adjacent cervical esophagus These findings
are characteristic of a Zenkers diverticulum
Figure 4-2 Lateral cervical diverticulum (Killian-Jamieson
diverticulum) Frontal spot image of the pharynx and
cervical esophagus during swallowing shows filling of a
tiny diverticulum (arrow) that arises from a discrete neck
on the left lateral wall of the cervical esophagus below the
cricopharyngeus These findings are characteristic of a lateral
cervical esophageal diverticulum
Trang 37diverticulum Alternatively, surgical diverticulopexy may
be performed by inverting the diverticulum to improve
emptying Finally, surgical diverticulectomy may be
per-formed as a definitive treatment option Killian-Jamieson
diverticulum is usually discovered as an incidental finding
in asymptomatic patients, but patients with dysphagia may
occasionally require surgical resection of the diverticulum
■ Dysphagia, halitosis, or recurrent aspiration
■ Findings on barium study pathognomonic
■ Treatment options: endoscopic diverticulotomy, gical diverticulopexy and surgical diverticulectomy with cricopharyngeal myotomy
sur-Killian-Jamieson Diverticulum
■ Anterolateral outpouching from cervical esophagus just below the cricopharyngeus
■ Usually no symptoms
■ Findings on barium study pathognomonic
■ Diverticulectomy only for large diverticulum ing dysphagia
caus-Further Reading
Brady AP, Stevenson GW, Somers S, et al Premature contraction
of the cricopharyngeus: new sign of gastroesophageal reflux
disease Abdom Imaging 1995;20:225–228.
Delahunty JE, Margulies SE, Alonso UA, et al The relationship
of reflux esophagitis to pharyngeal pouch (Zenker’s
diver-ticulum) Laryngoscope 1971;81:570–577.
Ekberg O, Nylander G Lateral diverticula from the
pharyngo-esophageal junction area Radiology 1983;146:117–122.
Frieling T, Berges W, Lubke HJ, et al Upper esophageal sphincter
function in patients with Zenker’s diverticulum Dysphagia
1988;3:90–92.
Knuff TE, Benjamin SB, Castell DO Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker’s)
diverticulum: a reappraisal Gastroenterology 1982;82:734–736.
Rubesin SE, Levine MS Killian-Jamieson diverticula:
radio-graphic findings in 16 patients AJR 2001;177:85–89.
Rubesin SE Structural abnormalities of the pharynx In: Gore
RM, Levine MS, eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology
3rd ed Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders, 2008:271–308.
B Thoracic Esophageal Diverticula
Definition
Thoracic esophageal diverticula may be classified as pulsion
or traction diverticula The more common pulsion diverticula
result from esophageal dysmotility with increased minal pressures in the esophagus, whereas traction diver-ticula are caused by scarring in the soft tissues surrounding the esophagus The latter diverticula usually develop in the midesophagus or distal esophagus above the gastroesopha-
intralu-geal junction (i.e., epiphrenic diverticulum) Other patients
may develop tiny outpouchings from the esophagus known
as esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula.
Demographic and Clinical Features
Pulsion diverticula are much more common than traction diverticula In most cases the diverticula are detected as inci-dental findings in patients who have no esophageal symp-toms However, a large epiphrenic diverticulum near the gastroesophageal junction may fill with debris, causing dys-phagia, regurgitation, or aspiration Because pulsion diver-ticula are usually associated with esophageal dysmotility, especially diffuse esophageal spasm, affected individuals may present with dysphagia or chest pain because of their under-lying motility disorder Traction diverticula and esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula are usually detected as inciden-tal findings, although patients with pseudodiverticula may have dysphagia because of associated esophageal strictures
Pathology
A pulsion diverticulum results from mucosal herniation through the wall of the esophagus; therefore pulsion diver-ticula do not contain a muscular lining In contrast, a traction diverticulum is a true diverticulum containing all layers of the esophageal wall, including a muscularis propria Pulsion diverticula are often associated with fluoroscopic or mano-metric findings of esophageal dysmotility, especially diffuse esophageal spasm It has therefore been postulated that these diverticula result from increased intraluminal pressures in the esophagus In contrast, traction diverticula are usually caused by scarring and volume loss in the perihilar regions from prior surgery, radiation therapy to the chest, or granu-lomatous diseases such as tuberculosis or histoplasmosis involving perihilar lymph nodes Finally, esophageal intra-mural pseudodiverticula consist pathologically of dilated excretory ducts of deep mucous glands in the esophagus
Imaging Features
Pulsion diverticula appear on barium studies as multiple rounded outpouchings from the distal or midesophagus that have wide necks (Figure 4-3) Because these diver-ticula lack a muscular lining, they often do not empty completely when the esophagus collapses and may be associated with other radiographic findings of esophageal motor dysfunction Although most patients with pulsion diverticula are asymptomatic, a giant epiphrenic diver-ticulum near the gastroesophageal junction may fill with debris, causing dysphagia, regurgitation, or aspiration (Figure 4-4)
Trang 38In contrast, traction diverticula typically appear
as solitary outpouchings from the midesophagus that have a triangular or tented appearance or a flat base with angulated margins due to traction on the divertic-ulum by a fibrotic process in the adjacent mediastinum (Figure 4-5) Because they contain a muscular lining, traction diverticula tend to empty their contents when the esophagus collapses at fluoroscopy Thus it is usu-ally possible to distinguish traction diverticula from pulsion diverticula on the basis of the radiographic findings
Esophageal pseudodiverticula typically appear on esophagography as tiny 2- to 5-mm flask-shaped out-pouchings in longitudinal rows parallel to the esophagus
or as tiny collections of barium that may not cate with the lumen (Figure 4-6) The pseudodiverticula classically have a diffuse distribution in the esophagus and are sometimes associated with strictures in the upper or midesophagus However, it is more common
communi-to have an isolated cluster of pseudodiverticula in the distal esophagus in the region of a peptic stricture In such cases, the pseudodiverticula most likely occur as a sequela of scarring from reflux esophagitis Occasionally longitudinal tracking may be seen in the wall of the esophagus between two or more adjacent pseudodiver-ticula (see Figure 4-6)
Figure 4-4 Giant epiphrenic diverticulum A frontal spot image
from a barium swallow shows a large amount of residual
barium filling a giant diverticulum (white arrows) arising from
the right lateral wall of the distal esophagus Also note barium
in a second tiny diverticulum (black arrow) more distally This
patient presented with dysphagia due to retention of food
within the diverticulum
Figure 4-3 Pulsion diverticulum Double-contrast view of the
esophagus shows a smooth round pulsion diverticulum (white
arrow) arising from a wide neck on the left lateral wall of the
distal esophagus Note multiple nonperistaltic contractions
(black arrows) in this patient with diffuse esophageal spasm
associated with the development of a pulsion diverticulum
Figure 4-5 Traction diverticulum Double-contrast view shows
a midesophageal diverticulum that has a flat base and angled margins (arrows) This most likely represents a traction diverticulum due to mediastinal scarring with retraction
of the adjacent esophageal wall This patient had normal esophageal motility
Trang 39Pitfalls and Mimics
When viewed en face on double-contrast esophagrams,
esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula can sometimes
be mistaken for tiny ulcers When viewed in profile,
how-ever, they often appear to be floating or levitating outside
the wall of the esophagus without apparent
communica-tion with the lumen (see Figure 4-6), whereas true
esopha-geal ulcers are almost always seen to communicate directly
with the lumen This sign is therefore extremely helpful for
differentiating esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula
from ulcers
Management/Clinical Issues
Patients with pulsion diverticula in the esophagus are
usually treated for their underlying esophageal motility
disorders (especially diffuse esophageal spasm), which are likely to be responsible for their symptoms Surgical repair may involve an associated longitudinal myotomy
to reduce local intraluminal pressure Traction diverticula and esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula rarely require specific treatment When the pseudodiverticula are associ-ated with strictures, however, these individuals may present with dysphagia, which is relieved by esophageal dilatation procedures
Key Points
Pulsion Diverticulum
■ Usually multiple
■ Mid- or distal esophagus
■ Rounded outpouching with discrete neck
■ Remains filled when esophagus collapses
■ Associated with diffuse esophageal spasm
Traction Diverticulum
■ Usually solitary
■ Midesophagus at level of pulmonary hila
■ Triangular outpouching with wide base
■ Empties when esophagus collapses
■ Associated with surgery, radiation, or tous disease in lungs
granuloma-Esophageal Intramural Pseudodiverticula
■ Dilated excretory ducts of deep mucous glands
■ Tiny flask-shaped outpouchings
■ Longitudinal rows parallel to long axis of esophagus
■ Often floating or levitating outside esophagus out direct communication
with-■ Longitudinal intramural tracking between pseudo- diverticula
■ Associated with strictures, especially peptic tures in distal esophagus
stric-Further Reading
1 Levine MS Miscellaneous abnormalities of the esophagus
In: Gore RM, Levine MS, eds Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology 3rd ed Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders,
2008:465–493.
2 Levine MS, Moolten DN, Herlinger H, et al Esophageal
intramural pseudodiverticulosis: a reevaluation AJR
1986;147:1165–1170.
Figure 4-6 Esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis
A prone right-anterior-oblique single-contrast view of the
esophagus shows innumerable tiny pseudodiverticula (white
arrows) arising from the wall of the lower and midthoracic
esophagus Note that many of the pseudodiverticula appear
to be floating or levitating outside the wall without apparent
communication with the lumen—a finding characteristic
of these structures Also note intramural tracking of barium
(black arrows) between some of the diverticula These tracks
can sometimes be mistaken for flat ulcers
Trang 40Candida esophagitis is by far the most common cause of
infectious esophagitis, typically occurring in
immunocom-promised patients A fulminant form of candidiasis is
some-times encountered in patients with AIDS Nevertheless, these
patients typically have an excellent response to treatment
with antifungal agents, even in the presence of severe disease
Demographic and Clinical Features
About 75% of patients with Candida esophagitis are
immu-nocompromised secondary to underlying malignancy;
treatment with radiation, chemotherapy, or steroids; or
other causes However, the remaining 25% of patients have
local esophageal stasis due to such conditions as achalasia
and scleroderma, which enable the fungal organisms to
overgrow and colonize the esophagus, leading to subsequent
esophagitis Only about 50% of patients with candidiasis
have oropharyngeal candidiasis (i.e., thrush), so the absence
of oropharyngeal disease in no way excludes this diagnosis
Patients with Candida esophagitis typically present with
odynophagia or dysphagia Even in patients with severe
dis-ease, however, there is usually a marked and rapid response
to treatment with antifungal agents such as fluconazole; thus
Candida esophagitis is a readily treatable disease.
Pathology
Candida esophagitis is characterized
histopathologi-cally by heaped-up areas of necrotic epithelial debris and
colonies of Candida albicans on the mucosa The lesions
are recognized grossly as white exudates and plaques
that have a distinctive endoscopic appearance Although
single-contrast barium studies have little value in patients
with suspected candidiasis, double-contrast barium
stud-ies have sensitivitstud-ies as high as 90% for detecting Candida
esophagitis in relation to endoscopy, primarily because
of the ability of such studies to demonstrate mucosal
plaques Thus only mild cases are likely to be missed on
the double-contrast examination
Imaging Features
Candida esophagitis is usually manifest on
double-contrast studies by discrete plaque-like lesions in the esophagus (Figure 5-1) The plaques may appear as linear or irregular filling defects that tend to be oriented longitudinally in relation to the long axis of the esopha-gus and are separated by segments of normal interven-ing mucosa During the past two decades, a much more fulminant form of candidiasis has been encountered
in patients with AIDS, who may present with a grossly
irregular or shaggy esophagus caused by innumerable
coalescent plaques and pseudomembranes with ping of barium between the lesions (Figure 5-2) Some
trap-of these plaques may eventually slough, producing one
or more deep ulcers superimposed on a background of diffuse plaque formation Occasionally AIDS patients may present with the shaggy esophagus of candidiasis
as the initial manifestation of their disease; therefore the examining radiologist may be the first to suggest that the patient has AIDS
Differential Diagnosis
■ Glycogenic acanthosis: A benign, degenerative dition characterized by accumulation of glycogen in the squamous epithelial cells lining the esophagus This condition appears on double-contrast studies in the form of discrete nodules, but they tend to have a more rounded appearance than the plaques of candi-diasis These patients also are elderly individuals who are not immunocompromised and have no esopha-
con-geal symptoms; thus differentiation from Candida
esophagitis is usually possible based on the clinical and radiographic findings
■ Reflux esophagitis: May be manifest by a nodular mucosa, but the nodules have poorly defined bor-ders and the nodularity extends proximally from the gastroesophageal junction as a continuous area of disease
■ Superficial spreading carcinoma: May be manifest by confluent nodules and plaques in a focal distribution, enabling differentiation from the discrete plaques and nodules of candidiasis