1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng

CFA 2017 level 3 flash card flash card managing institutional portf

3 22 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 3
Dung lượng 71,61 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Banks IPS -Constraints Time - Short - Linked to duration of liabilities Taxes - Taxable - After tax return is objective Liquidity - Short and Liquid Driven by bank w/ds and loan demands

Trang 1

1. Banks IPS

-Constraints

Time - Short - Linked to duration of liabilities Taxes - Taxable - After tax return is objective Liquidity - Short and Liquid Driven by bank w/ds and loan demands

Legal - RBC Guidelines Unique - None

-Return &

Risk

Risk - VAR Measures the size/sensitivity of A&Ls

LADG Leverage adjusted duration Gap -Duration of Bank Ass - Lev duration of Bank Liabilities

LADG - Predicts the change of MV of bank equity cap if In Rates change

Use ALM Framework - Below Average Risk Tolerance

Return - Positive Interest Rate Spread (Over cost of funds)

-Objectives

Directives come from the place of the securities portfolio in the A&L structure of the bank Portfolio is excess funds not lent out

Primary goal is to try to match the liabilities (deposits) and assets (Loans)

It's easier to adjust the characteristics of Invesment vs Assets and Liabilites, so portfolio duration is liability duration, unless manager wants to take duration risk Income is looked at last

4.Cash

Balance Plan

Credited each year w/ a pay credit and Int

Credit Sponsor bears investment risk

At retirement, you choose annuity or Lump Sum R/O

Management

Focuses on Short term changes in the liability

vs Changes in interest rates - Works best when pension is short term - near bankruptcy

IPS

-Constraints

Time - Perpetual Taxes - Tax Free - Watch UBTI Liquidity - Usually Low - Large Improvements may require liquidity

Legal - 501c3 and UMIFA Adoption - Prudent Investor Rule

Unique - Social Issues / Asset Class restrictions

- IPS - Risk &

Return

Risk Affected by need for outside funding

-% of funding needed Concerns are portfolio volatility and spending volatility

Return - Preserving Real Purchasing Power is Paramount Focus on TOTAL return, match inflation to inflation of the endowment

- Spending Rules

Examples:

Simple = Spending rate x $ Rolling 3 year average market value x Spending rate

Geometric Spending Rate - Smoothed Rate Calc

discount either before or after tax

IPS -Constraints

Time Horizon - Usually Infinite Tax Consid - Few UBTI Liquidity - Based on Spending Rules - Usually 5% of year end assets could leave a fraction

of annual spending as cash reserve

Legal - UMIFA Standards - Prudent Investor Rule

Unique - Foundation Specific - Moral/ethical investing is common

- IPS - Risk &

Return

Risk - Tend to be more aggressive then pensions - Based on time horizon Return - Driven by a formula like Req Payout + Inflation

VS Endowments

Foundations: Grant Making Entities Endowments: Long Term funds owned by non profit firms for OPS

vs DB Plan

IPS for DC Plan: Sponsor must provide:

1 At least 3 choices that allow for diversification and provide for free movement between investments

2 Education/Guidance

3 Limit Exposure to Company Stock

14.Liability Mimicking

For Satisfying future liability - use best mixture

of Nom Bonds Tips and Stocks

Cons The Liability portfolio will be costly and not provide a return above liability future services rendered and future participants calculations are uncertain and not modeled or pre-funded additional plan deposits will be required

For Pensions, it's best to use the liability portfolio as a benchmark not to actually implement it

15.Liability Relative Management

- Actives

Actives get divided into 2 categories:

1 Obligation for past service - acts like inactive

2 Obligations for future service - Uses % growth in wages and Calc NPV

If wage growth is at rate of inflation use real return on bonds as benchmark

If wage growth is above inflation, mimic w/ stocks

CFA Level 3 Book 2 - Managing Institutional Portfolios

Trang 2

16. Liability Relative

Management

-Inactive

For Active Pensions Best to decompose the Liabilites:

Inactive (retired or not working and not

of age) and Active (Currently working for the firm)

Inactives Future Benefits could be accrued as Fixed, inflation adjusted or indexed to inflation Use assets that mirror each of these

Companies

-Disintermediation

Risk

When Int Rates are high, Policy holders are likely to w/d cash This creates increased liquidity Over time Duration and Horizon have decreased

Companies - IPS

- Constraints

Time - Getting Shorter Taxes - High

Liquidity ALM, Marketability Risk -Surplus has little liquidity need

Legal/Reg - Heavy Regulations at state level Prudent Investor Rule, Specific Valuation Rules, Elligable Investment restrictions

Unique - Concentration of product offering, company size and Surplus

Companies - IPS

- Risk & Return

Objectives - NAIC requires an Asset Valuation Reserve (AVR) as reserve against losses There is a movement toward Risk Based Capital with means More Risk = More Reserve

Risks:

Valuation Risk - Duration of assets should

be close to duration of liabilities - ALM Management

Reinvestment Risk - Important for Guaranteed Products

Cash Flow Volatility - Reinvesting income

at good rates

Credit Risk on Debt

Return:

Shoot for Net Interest Spread - Greater than actuarial to grow surplus

Match/Segment Investment portfolios by business line

Mostly fixed in the portfolio until you hit surplus

Liabilities to

Assets

Asset Only Approach - Focus on selecting efficient portfolios This ignores that future liabilities could be subject to market risk

Better Solution:

Asset Allocation that recognizes Economic Liability

Liability Reserve Approach - Portfolio Mimics Liability Risk free Asset becomes the portfolio that mimics the liability

Companies - Health &

P&C - Characteristics

ALM Shorter Product Life Claims can be long tailed if disputed

Inflation Risk - Replacement Coverage

Timing is harder to predict then Life Underwriting has a "Profitability Cycle" - Reduce to retain customers, will reduce surplus

Operating Results are more variable then life

Companies IPS -Constraints

Time Horizon - Short - In periods of company loss you can use taxable bonds

Taxes- Taxable Companies - After Tax return is objective

Liquidity - Needs are high Typically mmkt, T-bills, laddered bonds, ALM matching

Legal - Less onerous than life insurance Risk based capital requirements are established Unique - Financial Status of firm, management or risk, and liquidity requirements

Companies IPS -Objectives

Risk - Quasi fiduciary requirement / geographic concentration risk Inflation Risk

Cash flows are erratic and unpredictable

Common Stock / Surplus Ratio has challenges

Return - LOW RISK - Key Factors - Comp Pricing - High Returns allow you to reduce prices

Profitability - Inv Income and ROI are Primary part of Comp Profit Surplus - More Surplus , More Ins you can sell

Total Return - Active Port Management is a focus, varied product mixes, returns vary among companies

Exposures: Liability Noise (2 types)

1 Plan demographics - More predicable to for large plans

2 Model Uncertainty - Less predictable (i.e Mortality of retirees when will deferreds retire?)

Trang 3

25.Pension IPS - Constraints Time Horizon - Termination Date or Active Lives vs Retired Lives

Taxes - (Unlikely anything is taxable) Liquidity - % of retired lives, $ of Contributions vs Ret Payout, Plan Features (Lump Sum) Legal/Reg - Erisa Rules, Pension Trustee is a Fiduciary

Unique Circ - ?Self Imposed Restrictions to Asset classes ETC

Return - Minimum Return should be Discount Rate used for PBO

2 Companies Financial Status UP Risk Tolerance UP

3 Company and Pension Fund Correlation UP Risk DOWN

4 Plan Features - Lump Sum Avail > Liquidity UP Risk DOWN

5 Workforce Characteristics - Younger Work Force Risk Tol UP

Ngày đăng: 15/06/2019, 11:19

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN

w