QUESTION 2 IS COMPOSED OF THREE PARTS A, B, C FOR A TOTAL OF 9 MINUTES Alpha Consultants provides portfolio evaluation services for institutional investors throughout Canada and is curr
Trang 1PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
QUESTION 1 IS COMPOSED OF THREE PARTS (A, B, C) FOR A TOTAL OF 12 MINUTES
Eugene Fenigore, CFA, and Barbara Mati, CFA, are responsible for overseeing the performance evaluation of a large government pension plan Fenigore and Mati are discussing the
performance of the plan’s assets during which Mati discusses the three components of micro performance attribution for equity investments
A State and explain the three components of micro attribution
(6 minutes)
Trang 2Fenigore and Mati analyze Sharpe style weights from 2011–2014 (results of the analysis are contained in Table 1) GM’s average style fit over the 4-year period is 96%
Table 1: Returns-Based Style Analysis
Russell 1000 Large Cap Value Index 1 1 1 0
Russell 1000 Large Cap Growth Index 0 1 1 0
Russell 2000 Small Cap Value Index 2 1 0 1
Russell 2000 Small Cap Growth Index 97 97 98 99
Total 100 100 100 100
B Determine whether Gamma Managers is most likely utilizing an active or passive strategy
and support the determination with two reasons from the data provided
(3 minutes)
C Based on the returns-based style analysis output, discuss whether Gamma Managers is
meeting its mandated strategy
(3 minutes)
Trang 3
QUESTION 2 IS COMPOSED OF THREE PARTS (A, B, C) FOR A TOTAL OF 9
MINUTES
Alpha Consultants provides portfolio evaluation services for institutional investors throughout Canada and is currently evaluating performance for a large pension fund One of the fund’s managers, Empire Partners, has invested in four sectors of the economy as well as holding a cash position The weights in the various sectors, returns, and overall performance of the manager and the benchmark chosen by Alpha are shown in the following table
Table 1: Portfolio and Benchmark Sector Allocations
Sector Weight
Benchmark Sector Weight
Portfolio Sector Return
Benchmark Sector Return
Consumer
A Using the data in Table 1, calculate the Empire Partners manager’s pure sector allocation
return in the energy sector Show your work
(3 minutes)
Trang 4
B Using the data in Table 1, calculate the Empire Partners manager’s within-sector selection
return in the financial sector Show your work
(3 minutes)
C Using the data in Table 1, calculate the Empire Partners manager’s allocation/selection
interaction return in the agricultural sector Show your work
(3 minutes)
Trang 5QUESTION 3 HAS TWO PARTS (A, B) FOR A TOTAL OF 10 MINUTES
Sal Holo and Che Back are discussing performance attribution analysis for the accounts they
manage Accounts E47 and E36 have the same objectives and investment style They should
have been managed the same way, and Back is surprised by the discrepancies in their recent
monthly returns The data is shown below:
Account: Time-weighted
return (TWR)
Money-weighted return (MWR)
For account E15, Holo has been struggling to find a suitable benchmark E15 is an actively
managed small cap growth portfolio The account mandate includes holding securities with an
average market cap of 25% or less and a beta 110% or more than those of the S&P 500
Back compiles the following analysis of three potential benchmarks He tells Holo to use this
analysis to test for a suitable benchmark
Characteristics:
Benchmark Archie Baker Charlie Beta from regression of monthly account to
benchmark returns
1.02 0.98 1.10
Standard deviation of alpha where alpha is account return minus benchmark return
5.1% 5.7% 9.7%
Noncoverage ratio: % of portfolio holdings that are not held in the benchmark
2% 4% 11%
A. Based on the monthly performance report, determine whether the two accounts were most
likely managed the same way and support your determination Discuss how external cash
Trang 6B. Based on all the information, recommend the most appropriate benchmark for account E15
Explain two reasons it is the most suitable benchmark For each benchmark not selected, explain one reason it is not appropriate
(5 minutes)