1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tài Chính - Ngân Hàng

2016 part 1 wiley CMAexcel learning system exam review self study guide

5 121 1

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 5
Dung lượng 421,57 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Section A: External Financial Reporting Decisions Topic 1: Financial Statements Page: 29 Figure 1A-3: +/- Extraordinary items +/- Changes in accounting principle Net income Page: 31

Trang 1

ERRATA

Added text is underlined Deleted text is struck out Modified text is in bold In some cases, additional

text, before and/or after the change, may be included to clarify the context or specific location Italicized

text is FYI

Section A: External Financial Reporting Decisions

Topic 1: Financial Statements

Page: 29

Figure 1A-3:

+/- Extraordinary items

+/- Changes in accounting principle

Net income

Page: 31

Order revised as appropriate for balance sheet presentation:

Shareholders’ Equity

Capital stock Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings

Treasury stock Accumulated other comprehensive income

Page: 36

Figure 1A-9 change as follows:

Increase (decrease) Decrease (increase) in merchandise inventory

Topic 2: Recognition, Measurement, Valuation, and Disclosure

Page 46:

Level 1 inputs: The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2 inputs: The fair value hierarchy gives intermediate priority to inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, that can be determined indirectly from the values of related assets with quoted prices in active markets are observable either directly or indirectly for assets or liabilities, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets

Level 3 inputs: The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to unobservable inputs and should be used only if observable inputs are not available

Page: 48

Figure 1A-11

On July 10, $50,000 $49,500 is received

Page: 49

Debit alignment of “cost of goods” is modified

Dr Sales returns and allowances selling price

Cr Accounts receivable selling price

Trang 2

Dr Merchandise inventory cost of goods

(or Loss on damaged goods)

Cr Cost of goods sold cost of goods

Page: 50-51

Similarly, if the allowance for doubtful accounts had a $6,000 $1,000 debit balance, then the amount needed to adjust the balance in the allowance account to the desired level would be a debit credit of

$2,000 $5,000

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Page: 52

If an amount previously written off using the direct write-off method is later collected, the amount is debited to cash and credited to a revenue account, such as uncollectible accounts recovered the

amount is debited to accounts receivable and credited to a revenue account such as bad debts

recovered and then another entry debits cash and credits accounts receivable

The first entry re-establishes the receivable

The second journal entry records the cash received

Page: 69

Income Statement (partial

Other revenues and gains

Interest revenue

$ xxx Other expenses and losses

Loss on sale of securities

xxx Net income

Other comprehensive income

Unrealized holding gain (loss) on

available-for-sale securities

Total other comprehensive income

Comprehensive income

$ xxx

(12,000) xxx

$ xxx

Page: 73

Trang 3

Page: 88

Alignment modified

Dr Income tax expense GAAP amount

Dr Deferred tax liability Difference

Cr Income tax payable IRS amount

Page: 98

If the remaining 6,000 shares are reissued for $8 per share:

Dr Cash 44,000 48,000

Dr Additional paid-in capital –treasury stock 4,000

Dr Retained earnings 6,000 2,000

Cr Treasury stock (6,000 × $9/share) 54,000

Par (or stated value) method In this method, treasury stock is recorded at par

value and additional paid-in capital is debited for the amount in proportion to the original issue price

Page: 99

The journal entry for the reacquisition of 10,000 $1 par shares (originally sold for $8 per share) for treasury stock at $9 per share would be:

Dr Treasury stock 10,000

If 4,000 treasury shares are reissued at $10 per share:

Dr Cash 40,000

Cr Treasury stock (4,000 × $9 $1/share) 4,000

Cr Additional paid-in capital—treasury stock in excess of par 36,000

Page: 101

Dr Cash ($20/share × 1,000 shares) 20,000

Dr Paid-in capital—stock options 4,000 6,000

Cr Common stock ($8 × 1,000 shares) 8,000

Cr Additional paid-in capital—common stock 16,000 18,000

([$20 – $4] 1,000 shares)

Page: 104

Journal entry for the 30% stock dividend (large stock dividend):

Dr Retained earnings 10,000 30,000

Cr Common stock dividend distributable 10,000 30,000

(100,000 shares × 10% 30% × $1 par/share)

Dr Common stock dividend distributable 10,000 30,000

Cr Common stock 10,000 30,000

Trang 4

Page: 109

Total estimated gross profit on the contract would be ($11,250,000 – $10,000,000) = $1,250,000, so 25% of this amount, or $312,500, is recognized as gross profit the first year Also, during the year the company billed the customer $2,250,000 and received $1,875,000 in payments

Page: 111

The current-period loss (based on the example above) is calculated in Figure 1A-42, continuing from the long-term construction contract illustration previously discussed

Figure 1A-42 Computation of Recognizable Loss in Current Period

Cost to date (12/31/Year 2, assuming $2,500,000 was incurred in Year 2)

Estimated costs to complete (revised)

Estimated total costs

Percentage complete: ($4,315,680 / $7,547,396) (5,000,000/11,000,000)

Revenue recognized in Year 2: ($6,660,000* × 57.2%) – $1,665,000†

($11,250,000* × 45.45%) – $2,812,500†

Costs incurred in Year 2

Loss recognized in Year 2

$4,315,680 3,231,716

$7,547,396 57.2%

2,144,520 2,797,360

$(652,840)

$5,000,000 6,000,000

$11,000,000 45.45% 2,300,625 2,500,000

$(199,375)

*(Contract price × 45.45%) - revenue recognized in Year 1 Revenue recognized in Year 2 on project

† Cumulative revenue recognized up to Year 1 on project (computed in prior discussion)

Page: 112

Dr Construction expense 2,797,360 2,500,000

Cr Construction in progress 652,840 199,375

Cr Revenue from long-term contracts 2,144,520 2,300,625

Section C: Performance Management

Topic 3: Performance Measures

Page: 371

Question 1C1-CQ2216

Page: 372

Question 1C1-CQ18

The financial statements show a $3,000 loss for a job that was budgeted to show a $6,000 profit

d The flexible budget variance was $900 unfavorable favorable

Section D: Cost Management

Topic 5: Business Process Improvement

Page: 504

1 Please remove “product testing” from inclusion as a prevention costs

2 Please make note that product testing is an appraisal cost

Trang 5

Essay Exam Support Materials

Page: 527

Correction to LO s Should be No 5 not No 55:

“…as outlined in Auditing Standard No 55.”

Page: 648

Question 1D-ES03

The last sentence on the page beginning “Without this planning and…” should be “Without this planing and…”

Note: Planing is a manufacturing process applicable to the scenario

Page: 681

Under Answer B: occurrences of “gross margin” need to be replaced with “gross profit”

Page: 691

Answer to Question 1D-ES03

Table A.1

Split-Off Value Total should be $1,300,000 $1,350,000

Page: 692

Answer to Question 1D-ES03

Table A.2

Split-Off Value Total should be $1,350,000 $1,300,000

Answers to Section Practice Questions

Page: 739

The other available answer choices are incorrect Note that the flexible budget variance includes all variable costs variances (material, direct labor, and variable overhead) as well as the fixed overhead budget variance is the variance between the actual results and flexible budget amount, which equals

$900 unfavorable

Ngày đăng: 23/05/2019, 08:46

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN