The Internal Environment The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm A Firm’s Tangible & Intangible Resources combine with Firm’s Capabilities to create Distinctive Competencies Distinct
Trang 1The Internal Environment The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
A Firm’s Tangible & Intangible Resources
combine with Firm’s Capabilities to create
Distinctive Competencies
Distinctive Competencies – those activities that
a firm performs better than any competing firm
Trang 2The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Sustained Competitive Advantage – firms that possess and exploit costly to imitate, rare, and valuable resources & capabilities
in choosing and implementing their
strategies may enjoy a period of sustained competitive advantage and above normal economic profit.
Trang 3The Internal Environment The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Tangible Resources:
facilities
Trang 4The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Intangible Resources:
Toyota’s well-known and trusted brand names,
New Season’s good reputation,
Intel’s knowledgeable and creative workforce,
Sun Microsystems’ unifying corporate culture,
Subway’s international experience with different country’s regulations on franchising,
Norm Thompson Outfitters’ visionary leader with strong
Trang 5The Internal Environment The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Skills and knowledge of firm’s employees, including
functional expertise (human capital)
Trang 6The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Capabilities
Examples:
• Toyota’s efficient distribution systems - Just-in-time (JIT) delivery, strong supplier relationships, and well-trained inventory specialists
• L.L Bean’s customer segmentation procedures and systems -
database management systems, effective market research efforts and strong supplier relationships
• Nike’s new product development procedures – creative workforce and innovation-driven culture, strong leadership, and effective market research
Trang 7The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Distinctive Competencies: The VRIO
Framework
Question of Value: Do a firm’s resources and
capabilities enable the firm to respond to
neutralize external threats and/or capitalize on external opportunities?
Example: Are InFocus’ engineers and marketing staff able to develop and sell home-based projector systems before its competitors?
Trang 8The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Distinctive Competencies: The VRIO Framework
Question of Rarity: Is a resource or capability currently
controlled by only a small number of competing firms?
Example: Does InFocus have the technical expertise and
market access that other firms do not have to innovate and sell home-based projector systems?
Trang 9The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Distinctive Competencies: The VRIO Framework
Question of Inimitability: Do firms without the resource
or capability face a cost disadvantage in obtaining or
developing it?
Example: Is it quite expensive for Toshiba to internally develop the expertise to manufacture home-based projector systems?
Trang 10The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Distinctive Competencies: The VRIO Framework
Question of Organization: Are a firm’s other policies
and procedures organized to support the use of its
valuable, rare, and costly to imitate resources and/or capabilities?
Example: Are InFocus’ organizational structure and
compensation policies appropriate to support its efforts to develop, manufacture and distribute home-based projector systems?
Trang 11The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Value Chain Analysis
Examines contributions of individual activities to overall
level of customer value and ultimately financial
performance.
Customer value: product differentiation, low cost, and/or responsiveness
Trang 12The Internal Environment
Technology Development
Procurement
Value Chain Analysis
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Trang 13Logistics Operations
OutboundLogistics
Marketing & Sales Customer
Appropriate automation of production processes
Effectiveness
of production control systems
to improve quality and reduce costs
Efficiency of plant layout and work-flow design
Timeliness and efficiency of delivery of finished goods and services
Efficiency of finished goods warehousing activities
Effectiveness of market research to identify customer segments & needs
Innovation in sales
& promotion
Evaluation of alternate distribution channels
Motivation and competence of sales force
Development of image of quality and
a favorable reputation
Extent of brand loyalty among customers
Extent of market dominance within
Means to solicit customer input for product improvements
Promptness of attention to customer complaints
Appropriateness
of warranty and guarantee
policies
Quality of customer education and training
Ability to provide replacement parts and repair service
Primary Activities and Factors for Assessment
Trang 14Firm Infrastructure
Human Resource
Technology Development
relatively low cost
funds for capital
Appropriateness
of reward systems
Relations with trade unions
Levels of employee motivation and job satisfaction
Success of R&D activities in leading
to product and process innovations
Quality of working relationship between R&D personnel and other departments
Timeliness of technology development activities in meeting critical deadlines
Qualifications &
experience of laboratory technicians and scientists
Ability of work environment to encourage creativity and innovation
Development of alternate sources for inputs to minimize dependence on a single supplier
Procurement of raw materials on timely basis at lowest possible cost and at acceptable levels of quality
Development for criteria for lease-vs.- buy decisions
Good, long-term relationships with suppliers
Secondary Activities and Factors for Assessment
Trang 15The Internal Environment
So strengths and weaknesses are based on how well
value chain activities are performed
Resources and capabilities determine the performance
of value chain activities Look at…
Corporate culture and Leadership
Marketing management issues
Financial management issues
R&D management issues
HR management issues
Operations management issues
Information systems management issues
Stakeholder management issues
Trang 16The Internal Environment
The Strengths and Weakness of the Firm
Is a resource or capability…
Costly to Exploited Competitive
Adv.
Trang 17The Internal Environment
Life Expectancy of Sustained Competitive
Example: An I-beam is an I-beam, but an automobile comes in
Trang 18The Internal Environment
Life Expectancy of Sustained Competitive
Advantage
Switching Costs Between Rivals: the easier it is to switch, the
easier it is to take away competitive advantage
Example: Difficulty in switching between office systems
management service providers versus ease of switching between office supplies provider
Trang 19Internal Factor Analysis Summary
Internal Factors Weight Rating Weighted
Score
Comments Strengths
Weaknesses
Trang 20Internal Factor Analysis Summary
Same basic procedure as the External Factor
Analysis Summary.
See page 101 and 102 of the text for more discussion of the IFAS.
Trang 21Internal Scanning
Example: Proctor & Gamble (circa 1992)
Resources
Research and Development
P&G invests 4% of worldwide sales in research and development ahead of most
of its global competitors In 1997-98 this amounted to $1.5 billion
P&G has a world class, global research and development organization, with over 7,500 scientists working in 22 research centers in 12 countries around the
world
Innovative Workforce
P&G holds more than 24,000 active patents worldwide, and on average, receives about 3,800 more patents per year This makes P&G among the world's largest holders of U.S and global patents, putting it on a par with Intel, Lucent and
Trang 22Proctor & Gamble
Capability
Directed growth and maximized chances of success by leveraging considerable technical competencies across product categories and national boundaries
Competencies
A deep understanding of consumers, their habits and product needs
The ability to acquire, develop and apply technology across P&G's broad array of product categories
The ability to make "connections" between consumers' wants and what technology can deliver
Strategic Issue
Market research revealed brand loyal consumers were paying $725/year more than families buying private-label or store brands
Trang 23Factors for Assessment:
Technology Development (R&D): was the initiator of product development,
produced technologically superior productS
Firm Infrastructure: Relationship between R&D and Marketing & Sales Marketing released new products under new brand names
Marketing & Sales: complex with 17 pricing brackets for 34 product
categories
Manufacturing: Capacity utilization averaged about 55%, with excess needed
to handle bubble demand brought on by occasional price wars
Outbound Logistics: heavily paper-laden
Methods for Assessment:
Organizational Perspective:
Superior products no longer matched needs of marketplace, particularly in
developing markets
Devolve products – less technology, lower price
Put marketing research in charge of setting initial new product development
guidelines
Trang 24Methods for Assessment:
Customer value:
Brand equity for existing brands is high (e.g Ivory) Release new
developments under existing brand names rather than creating new ones
Improve customer value by strengthening brand relationship to new products.
Financial Perspective:
Outbound logistics unnecessarily expensive Work with industry stakeholders,including competitors, to simplify delivery system through standardization and
computerization Improves industry’s profitability.
Reduce number of brands and product lines Simplifies manufacturing
process and eliminate slack in capacity utilization Better ROA, and hopefully
better P/E ratio.