1. Trang chủ
  2. » Thể loại khác

Speeches in world history facts on file, 2009

673 59 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 673
Dung lượng 21,99 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

viii SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrYJohn Bright: Against American Slavery 1862, England ...252Abraham Lincoln: The Gettysburg Address 1863, United States ...254John Stuart Mill: On the right o

Trang 2

Speeches

In World

History

Trang 5

SPEECHES IN WORLD HISTORY

Copyright © 2009 by Suzanne McIntire

Foreword and chapter introductions, copyright © 2009 Facts On File

All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form

or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher For information contact:

Facts On File, Inc

An imprint of Infobase Publishing

132 West 31st Street

New York NY 10001

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Speeches in world history / [compiled by] Suzanne McIntire ; with

additional contributions by William E Burns

our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755

You can find Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfile.com

Excerpts included herewith have been reprinted by permission of the copyright holders; the author has made every effort to contact copyright holders The publishers will be glad

to rectify, in future editions, any errors or omissions brought to their notice

Text design by Erika K Arroyo

Cover design by Takeshi Takahashi

Printed in the United States of America

Trang 6

List of Illustrations xii

Foreword by William E Burns xv

Acknowledgments xx

How to Use This Book xxi

THE ANCIENT WORLD TO  550 .. Introduction to the Ancient World 1

Speeches 5

Dan, Duke of Zhou: The Shao Announcement (ca 1036 ..., China) 7

Jeremiah: “O Earth, Earth, Earth, Hear the Word” (605 ..., Jerusalem) 9

Darius I: “The Rule of One” (522 ..., Persia) 11

Gautama Buddha: Sermon at Benares (ca 521 ..., India) 13

Artemisia: Advice to Xerxes I (480 ..., Greece) 16

Pericles: Funeral Oration (431 ..., Athens) 18

Socrates: The Trial Addresses (399 ..., Athens) 21

Demosthenes: On the Crown (330 ..., Athens) 26

Publius Cornelius Scipio: Against Hannibal (218 ..., Italy) 32

Gaius Marius: On Humbleness of Birth (106 ..., Rome) 34

Marcus Tullius Cicero: First Oration against Catiline (63 ..., Rome) 37

Julius Caesar: “The Alternative of Exile” (63 ..., Rome) 40

Cato the Younger: “Foes Are within Our Walls” (63 ..., Rome) 43

Catiline: To His Soldiers (62 ..., Italy) 45

Hortensia: “When Have There Not Been Wars?” (42 ..., Rome) 47

Jesus of Nazareth, The Sermon on the Mount (28–30 .., Israel) 49

Claudius I: “United under Our Name” (48 .., Rome) 53

Caratacus: To Emperor Claudius (51 .., Rome) 55

Boudica, “A Woman’s Resolve” (60 .., Britain) 56 El’azar ben Yair: Speech at Masada

Contents

Trang 7

on the dignity of Man” 

(1486, italy)  115girolamo Savonarola: “let Me Be persecuted” (1497, italy)  119António de Montesinos: “Are They not Men?” (1511, española)  122Moctezuma: Welcoming hernán  

cortés to Mexico (1519, tenochtitlán, or city of Mexico)  124Martin luther: “i Stand here and can  Say no More” 

(1521, germany)  127hernán cortés: “These Shabbily dressed Men” (1524, Mexico) 130Bartolomé de las casas: The Valladolid debate (1550, Spain)  132Queen elizabeth i: “The heart and  

Stomach of a King” 

(1588, england)  135James i: “Kings Are Justly called gods”  (1609, london)  137powhatan: to captain John Smith  

(1609, Virginia)  139John Winthrop: “We Shall Be as a city  upon a hill” 

(1630, off the coast of england)  142galileo galilei: Abjuration before the  

roman inquisition (1633, rome)  144Thomas rainborow: “All law lies in 

 the people” 

(1647, england)  146charles i: From the Scaffold 

(1649, england)  148António Vieira: “The Sins of Maranhão” (1653, Brazil)  151Joseph-Antoine de la Barre: Address  

to the Five nations (1684, United States)  154

Trang 8

Garangula: “Do Not Choke the Tree

of Peace” (1684, United States) 156Andrew Hamilton: In Defense of Freedom

of the Press (1735, New York City) 158John Wesley: “The New Birth”

(1740, Great Britain) 161

THE AGE OF rEVOLUTION AND EMPIrE

(1750–1900)Introduction to the Age of revolution and Empire 167

Speeches 171Minavavana: “You Know That His

Enemies Are Ours”

(1761, United States) 173William Pitt the Elder: Toward repealing the Stamp Act

(1766, England) 175William Pitt the Elder: “Justice to America”

(1775, England) 178Edmund Burke: On Conciliation with America (1775, England) 181Patrick Henry: “Give Me Liberty or

Give Me Death”

(1775, United States) 185Samuel Adams: “No Other Alternative Than Independence”

(1776, United States) 188William Pitt the Elder: “You Cannot

Conquer America”

(1777, England) 191Benjamin Franklin: To the

Constitutional Convention (1787, United States) 193William Wilberforce: “The Number of Deaths Speaks for Itself”

(1789, England) 195William Pitt the Younger: “An

Inexcusable Injustice”

(1792, England) 199Georges-Jacques Danton: “Always to Dare!”

Charles James Fox: “The Principle Which Gives Life to Liberty”

(1795, England) 207Napoleon Bonaparte: To His Soldiers

on Entering Milan (1796, Italy) 210George Washington: “Observe Good

Faith and Justice to All Nations”

(1796, United States) 212Toussaint Louverture: “A Land of

Slavery Purified by Fire”

(1802, Haiti) 215robert Emmet: “My Country Was My Idol”

(1803, Ireland) 217red Jacket: “We Never Quarrel about religion”

(1805, United States) 220Miguel Hidalgo: The Cry of Dolores

(1810, Mexico) 223José María Morelos: “Spirits of

Moctezuma Take Pride”

(1813, Mexico) 226Simón Bolívar: “The Illustrious Name

of Liberator”

(1814, Venezuela) 228Daniel Webster: The Bunker Hill Oration (1825, United States) 230Daniel O’Connell: “Justice for Ireland”

(1836, England) 233Frederick Douglass: Against Slavery

(1846, England) 235Victor Hugo: Against Capital Punishment (1851, France) 239Louis Kossuth: “Become the Lafayettes

of Hungary”

(1851, New York City) 241John Bright: “The Angel of Death”

(1855, England) 243Lucy Stone: “A Disappointed Woman”

(1855, United States) 245David Livingstone: “Commerce and

Christianity”

Trang 9

viii SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

John Bright: Against American Slavery (1862, England) 252Abraham Lincoln: The Gettysburg Address (1863, United States) 254John Stuart Mill: On the right of

Women to Vote (1866, England) 256Susan B Anthony: “Are Women Persons?”

(1873, United States) 258William Gladstone: On Empire

(1879, Scotland) 261Henry Edward Manning: Condemning Anti-Semitism

(1882, England) 263Frederick Engels: Eulogy on Karl Marx (1883, England) 266José Martí: “Mother America”

(1889, New York City) 269Machemba: “I Am Sultan in My Land”

(1890, German East Africa, now Tanzania) 272Wobogo: “Never Come Back”

(1895, Upper Volta, now Burkina Faso) 273Máximo Gómez: “respect Our

revolution” (1896, Cuba) 274Max Simon Nordau: Address to the

First Zionist Congress (1897, Switzerland) 275Émile Zola: “Dreyfus Is Innocent!”

(1898, France) 279

CrISIS AND ACHIEVEMENT (1900–1950)

Introduction to Crisis and Achievement 285

Speeches 289

Mohandas K Gandhi: The Pledge to resistance (1906, South Africa) 291Mark Twain: Farewell to England

(1907, England) 294Emmeline Pankhurst: “This Women’s

Civil War”

(1913, England) 296Patrick Pearse: “Ireland Unfree Shall

Never Be at Peace”

(1915, Ireland) 299

roger Casement: On Loyalty to Ireland (1916, England) 301Woodrow Wilson: “The World Must Be Made Safe for Democracy”

(1917, United States) 304Charles E Stanton: “Lafayette, We Are Here”

(1917, France) 307Emma Goldman: Trial Address (1917,

United States) 308

V I Lenin: “A Workers’ and Peasants’

revolution”

(1917, russia) 312Woodrow Wilson: On Behalf of

the League of Nations (1919, United States) 314Marie Curie: On Discovering radium

(1921, United States) 316Mohandas K Gandhi: “I Want to Avoid Violence” (1922, India) 318Mustafa Kemal Atatürk: “Women and Men Will Walk Side by Side”

(1923, Turkey) 321Adolf Hitler: “The Drummer of National Germany”

(1932, Germany) 323Stephen S Wise: Madison Square Garden Address

(1933, United States) 325Ernst Toller: “The Arm of Hitler”

(1934, Scotland) 328Haile Selassie I: Address to the League

of Nations (1936, Switzerland) 333Dolores Ibárruri: “Fascism Is Not Invincible”

(1937, Spain) 336Edouard Daladier: “The Slaves of Nazi Masters”

(1940, France) 339Winston Churchill: “Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat”

(1940, England) 341Winston Churchill: “We Shall Fight on the Beaches”

(1940, England) 344Winston Churchill: “This Was Their

Finest Hour”

(1940, England) 347

Trang 10

Face of the World” 

(1955, indonesia)  418nikita Khrushchev: The Secret Speech  (1956, USSr)  421luis Muñoz Marín: “An America to  

Serve the World” 

(1956, United States)  424golda Meir: “peace with our Arab  

neighbors”  

(1957, United nations) 428richard nixon: to the russian people  (1959, USSr)  431harold Macmillan: “The Wind of change” 

(1960, South Africa)  434patrice lumumba: independence day Address (1960, democractic republic of  

the congo)  438patrick duncan: “An Unjust law is  

no true law” 

(1960, South Africa)  441dwight d. eisenhower: The Military-

industrial complex (1961, United States)  445John F. Kennedy: inaugural Address  

(1961, United States)  448gideon hausner: “Six Million Accusers”  

(1961, israel)  451Adlai Stevenson: Speech at the United nations (1962, United nations)  455Julius Kambarage nyerere: on dancing the  

Gombe Sugu 

(1962, tanganyika, now tanzania)  457

Trang 11

x SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

Nelson Mandela: The rivonia Trial Address (1964, South Africa) 466Martin Luther King, Jr.: Nobel Peace Prize Address (1964, Norway) 471robert F Kennedy: “A Desert of Our

Own Creation”

(1968, United States) 474Chaim Herzog: “The Aim of Zionism”

(1975, United Nations) 478Anwar Sadat: To the Israeli Knesset

(1977, Israel) 481Natan Sharansky: “At Peace with My

Conscience”

(1978, USSr) 486Wei Jingsheng: “These Leaders Are

Not Gods”

(1979, China) 488Jacobo Timerman: “The Books Were

the First Victims”

(1981, United States) 492ronald reagan: The “Evil Empire”

Speech (1983, United States) 496Susan Hannah rabin: “We Are Children Who Fear for Our Lives”

(1983, Finland) 500Lech Wałęsa: “The Value of Human Solidarity”

(1983, Norway) 502Nelson Mandela: “Your Freedom and

Mine Cannot Be Separated”

(1985, South Africa) 506Elie Wiesel: remembering the Jewish

Children of Izieu (1987, France) 509ronald reagan: “Mr Gorbachev, Tear

Down This Wall!”

(1987, Germany) 511Salah Khalaf: “No Peace without the

Palestinians”

(1989, Israel) 514Viktor Orbán: On the reburial of Imre Nagy (1989, Hungary) 518Fang Lizhi: “The Terror That Has

Earth Summit (1992, Brazil) 526rigoberta Menchú Tum: “Freedom for the Indians”

(1992, Norway) 528Paul Keating: The redfern Address

(1992, Australia) 531Aung San Suu Kyi: On the rightful Place

of Women (1995, China) 535King Hussein: Eulogy to Yitzhak rabin (1995, Israel) 539Kim Phúc: At the Vietnam War Memorial (1996, United States) 541Diana, Princess of Wales: “This Terrible Legacy of Mines”

(1997, England) 542Benazir Bhutto: “One Billion Muslims Are at the Crossroads”

(1997, United States) 545Craig Kielburger: “Free the Children”

(1997, Canada) 550Boris Yeltsin: Apology for the Murder of the romanovs (1998, russia) 553Nkosi Johnson: At the 13th International AIDS Conference

(2000, South Africa) 555Vojislav Koštunica: “Dear Liberated Serbia!”

(2000, Yugloslavia) 558Pope John Paul II: Apology for the Sack

of Constantinople (2001, Greece) 560Jean Chrétien: “With the United States Every Step of the Way”

(2001, Canada) 562Johannes rau: “America Does Not

Stand Alone”

(2001, Germany) 564George W Bush: To the United Nations

on the Terrorist Attacks (2001, United Nations) 566

Trang 12

Kofi Annan: “Two States, Israel and Palestine”

(2002, Lebanon) 569

Mahathir bin Mohamad: “Muslims Everywhere Must Condemn Terrorism” (2002, Malaysia) 572

Muhammad Yunus: “Poverty Was All around Me” (2003, England) 575

Gerhard Schröder: “I Bow My Head before the Victims” (2005, Germany) 579

Mikhail Gorbachev: “The Historical Achievement of Perestroika” (2005, United States) 582

Alberto Mora: “Cruelty Disfigures Our National Character” (2006, United States) 587

Akbar Ganji: “The Struggle against Violence” (2006, russia) 590

Albert Gore, Jr.: “A Planetary Emergency” (2006, United States) 593

Wangari Muta Maathai: “Our Future Is in Our Environment” (2007, United States) 597

Appendix 1 Writing a Persuasive Speech 601

Appendix 2 Delivering a Great Speech 603

Appendix 3 Working with Speeches as Primary Sources 605

General Bibliography 607

Speeches by Title 611

Speeches by Orator 615

Speeches by Nationality 619

List of rhetorical Devices 624

Comprehensive Index 625

Trang 13

AS

Darius I the Great, detail of a relief,

Persepolis, Persia, 491–486 .. 12

Photograph of the Great Buddha statue in Kamakura, Japan, built 1252 15

Photograph of the bust of Pericles, said to be from Hadrian’s Villa at Tivoli, Lazio, Italy 19

Alexander the Great of Macedonia, detail from a mosaic originally from the Casa del Fauno, Pompeii 30

Marcus Tullius Cicero addressing the Senate, painting by Cesare Maccari 38

Julius Caesar, a bronze statue near Trajan’s Forum 41

Caratacus addresses Emperor Claudius I in Rome 55

Boudica (or Boadicea) rides among her troops 56

Portrait of Saint Augustine of Hippo 65

A detail of Byzantine empress Theodora and her court, from a mosaic in S Vitale, Ravenna, Italy 67

King Æthelberht of Kent receives Augustine, the Roman missionary 77

Abu Bakr, Ali ibn Abi Talib, and Muhammad, painting from the book Life of the Prophet, 1594 81

Saint Bernard of Clairvaux preaches a Second Crusade in France, 1146 96

Saint Francis preaching to the birds 100

Portrait of Pico della Mirandola 117

Portrait of Girolamo Savonarola, ca 1498 120

Moctezuma greets Cortés in an illustration from the History of the Indians, by Diego Durán, 1579 125

Engraving of Hernán Cortés 130

Engraving of Chief Wahunsonacock of the Powhatan Confederacy 140

Galileo Galilei answers charges of heresy before the Roman Inquisition, in a painting from 1633 145

Portrait of Charles I, king of England 149

Engraving of John Wesley 162

Engraving of William Pitt the Elder 176

Engraving of Patrick Henry 186

Engraving of William Wilberforce from 1814 197

Engraving of Maximilien de Robespierre 205

François-Dominique Toussaint, engraving from the book The Negro in the New World, by Sir Harry H Johnston, 1910 215

Lithograph of Robert Emmet 219

Portrait of Red Jacket, or Segoyewatha, Seneca chief 221

Father Miguel Hidalgo leading an army of Mexican peasants 224

Photograph of Daniel Webster 231

Photograph of Frederick Douglass 236

List of Illustrations

Trang 14

Daguerreotype of Lucy Stone 246

David Livingstone, engraving, 1857 248

Abraham Lincoln speaking at Gettysburg,

November 19, 1863 255

Photograph of John Stuart Mill, 1884 257

José Martí, portrait on the Cuban one

peso note 270

Photograph of Max Nordau 276

Mohandas K Gandhi outside his law office in

South Africa, 1902 292

Portrait of Mark Twain as public speaker 295

Emmeline Pankhurst, arrested in London,

May 1914 297

Woodrow Wilson giving the declaration of

war to Congress April 2, 1917 305

Photograph of “Red Emma” Goldman 309

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin waving to the crowd

in Red Square, Moscow, October 1917 313

Photograph of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 321

Photograph of Ernst Toller, 1933 329

Edouard Daladier with other signers of the

Munich Pact, 1938 340

Winston Churchill walking through the

Blitz bomb damage 342

Princess Margaret and Princess Elizabeth

during a World War II radio broadcast 352

Franklin D Roosevelt signing the declaration

of war 354

General Douglas MacArthur, signing of surrender

instruments on USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay 366

Robert H Jackson speaking at the

Jomo Kenyatta receiving the Instruments

of Independence, Nairobi, Kenya,

Nikita Khrushchev and Richard Nixon during the Kitchen Debates, Moscow, July 24, 1959 432

Dwight D Eisenhower at John F Kennedy’s inauguration, January 20, 1961 446

Julius Nyerere and Milton Obote in Kampala, Uganda, July 1969 458

John F Kennedy addressing Berliners, June 26, 1963 465

Nelson Mandela leaving court, Pretoria, South Africa, August 1958 468

Chaim Herzog at the podium in the

UN General Assembly, 1975 479

Anwar Sadat at a press conference, 1977 482

Demonstrators protesting the imprisonment

of Wei Jingsheng 489

Ronald Reagan delivering the “Evil Empire”

speech, Orlando, Florida, March 8, 1983 497

Lech Wałęsa leaving the Lenin Shipyards Gdanśk, Poland, June 17, 1983 503

Elie Wiesel at Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, Poland, January 17, 1988 510

Václav Havel toasting Czech Politbureau resignation 525

Rigoberta Menchú Tum addressing crowd, Guatemala City, October 17, 1992 529

Aung San Suu Kyi delivering a speech, Rangoon (Yangon), Myanmar (Burma), June 1996 536

Benazir Bhutto leading a protest rally, Islamabad, Pakistan, November 10, 2007 546

Craig Kielburger during a news conference, Ottawa, Canada, February 1996 551

Nkosi Johnson speaking at the annual International Aids Conference, Durban, South Africa 556

Vojislav Koštunica addressing reporters, Belgrade, September 24, 2000 559

Kofi Annan sitting at the Arab League summit, Beirut, March 27, 2002 570

Trang 16

No one knows who was the first human to address his

or her fellows as a group Perhaps this person was

someone organizing a hunting or gathering expedition, or

urging that a clan relocate in the face of climate change or

the coming of dangerous animals Whoever it was, he or

she was inaugurating a long and varied tradition of public

speaking, extending through a myriad of civilizations and

societies to the present day

This book contains some of the highlights of this

long human tradition The speeches cover the time from

the dawn of ancient civilization in the Middle East to the

21st century and are the work of people ranging from

kings to ordinary, sometimes even anonymous, people

Some of the speakers, such as Jesus, Muhammad, and

Abraham Lincoln, rank among the very greatest names in

history Others are more obscure or even unknown, but

their words are often equally eloquent By studying their

words, we can learn more about speaking and also about

the human condition

Speeches in World History contains more than 200

speeches by people from all walks of life on every

con-tinent—from a Chinese ruler (Dan, duke of Zhou) who

helped found the Chinese political system almost 3,000

years ago to an African woman (Wangari Maathai) who

won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004 for pioneering

envi-ronmental conservation as a road to world peace You will

find significant speeches from U.S history, little known

speeches from Latin America, important addresses from

the Muslim world, and speeches from the ancients on

top-ics so timeless they are still debated today The selections

dice, colonialism, self-determination, women’s rights, cism and communism, nuclear proliferation, free speech, terrorism, the rights of indigenous peoples, even environ-mental degradation

mon-to Winsmon-ton Churchill, John F Kennedy, and Barack Obama in modern times

Political speeches vary greatly by both audience and the persuasive mission of the speaker At times the speaker is a ruler or authority figure, giving commands

to subjects and subordinates or inspiring loyalty and enthusiasm (Kings and dictators are not the only ones to fall into this category; so do generals, such as Napoleon, who address their troops, or revolutionary leaders, such

as Lenin, who inspire their followers.) Other times, the speaker addresses equals, as a member of a legislature, for example, William Pitt, who desperately tried to save Britain from fatally alienating its American colonies A

Foreword

Trang 17

xvi SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

not be said, as is demonstrated by the elaborate codes

of the British parliament and U.S Congress that forbid

members to refer to each other by name, as in the

Brit-ish parliamentary phrase, “The honourable member for

Westminster.”

Other political speakers may be addressing ple outside the elite, in an attempt to gain their sup-

peo-port Anticolonial leaders, including Simón Bolívar

and Mohandas Gandhi, have addressed the poor and

oppressed in an attempt to mobilize them for violent

or nonviolent action Speakers in countries with open

political systems have given speeches to ordinary

peo-ple advocating particular policies or attempting to

gar-ner votes in an election Such “campaign speeches” can

outline a particular agenda, but arguments for these

specific positions often play only a minor role The real

focus of many “positive” campaign speeches is

persuad-ing hearers that the speaker is a good person who shares

their opinions and deserves their vote “Negative”

cam-paign speeches attempt to convince hearers that the

speaker’s opponent is unworthy of their support

Speaking is also often part of public ceremonial occasions, as when Lincoln made his Gettysburg

Address at the dedication of the memorial on the Civil

War battlefield Ceremonial addresses are very

differ-ent from campaign speeches At a ceremonial address

it is considered in poor taste for a speaker to draw too

much attention to him or herself or to attack political

enemies A tone of humility, as displayed by Lincoln, is

often more effective than “blowing your own horn.” The

focus of a ceremonial speech should be on the occasion

that has brought speaker and hearer together

religious oratory

rivaling and sometimes even eclipsing politics as a place

for an orator’s voice to be heard is religion

Speechmak-ing has been an important part of religious life for

mil-lennia Founders of major world religions—the Buddha,

Jesus, and Muhammad, to name a few—were renowned

for their persuasiveness and speaking ability The

mes-sage of Judaism was never so powerfully expressed as by

the voice of its prophets such as Jeremiah, who fearlessly

scourged Jewish society for its failure to live up to the

demands of its God Each religion, with many others,

has spawned a tradition of sermons, often integrated

into services, such as the Christian Sunday sermon or

the Islamic Friday khutba.

There are many differences of terminology between religious and political speakers rather than orators,

religious speechmakers are preachers, and their

ora-tions are not speeches but sermons Even so, there are

many similarities in practice Like a political speaker,

a religious speaker must take his or her audience into

account religious speakers sometimes address those who are already followers of their religion, explicating religious doctrine and law or urging hearers to greater piety The mission of Bernard of Clairvaux and other medieval “crusade preachers” was to convince com-mitted Christians to take the extra step of vowing to go

on crusade At other times, religious speakers address unbelievers, particularly in the early days of a religion

or when it is expanding to a new area through the work

of missionaries, such as the Korean Buddhist monk Musang, a seventh- and eighth-century missionary in China In these addresses speakers must make their religious message as appealing as possible to people who do not share many of their assumptions Once a religion is established, a parish priest or congregational rabbi might use his weekly sermons to address a com-munity he knows intimately, building a relationship that can last for decades A traveling revivalist such

as John Wesley was, on the other hand, has the task of addressing an audience full of strangers he may never see again and must rely on themes that will move a crowd Sometimes religious speakers claim direct inspiration from their God or gods The enthusiastic

speaker claiming divine inspiration (the term

enthu-siasm in the original Greek referred to possession by a

god) has often been viewed as a threat by established religious hierarchies

religious speeches, like political speeches, vary in themes and tone from the emotionalism of the “revival”

to the perfunctoriness of many short sermons Some preachers appeal to the intellect, constructing their ser-mons as logical arguments, while others focus on the passions, relying on rhetorical appeals and variations

in tone of voice to move the crowd “Hellfire” tian preachers use vivid depictions of the torments of the damned to frighten their hearers into repentance

Chris-Others evoke the sufferings of Jesus on the cross or the joys of heaven Some religious speeches are reserved for special holidays or ceremonial occasions such as the Christmas and Easter sermons of Christian minis-

ters, the ramadan khutbas of Muslim preachers, or the

Asarna Bucha sermons of Thai Buddhist monks ers expect these sermons to focus on a well-worn set

Hear-of images and ideas Christmas sermons, for example, frequently draw on the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ birth (the reason for the holiday)

Of course, given the intertwining of religion and politics throughout history, religious and politi-cal speechmaking have never been totally separate

Many political speeches include some rhetorical appeal

to God, and religious idioms have greatly influenced political speakers Candidates for election in the United States routinely refer to God and their faith in their

Trang 18

campaign speeches American civil rights leader

Mar-tin Luther King, Jr., an ordained minister, drew on the

tradition of the African-American sermon to make

fun-damentally political speeches Many preachers of the

world’s religious traditions have included political

mes-sages in their sermons

Forensic oratory

The courtroom has often been an arena for

speechmak-ers Some of the greatest orators were also lawyers, who

became as renowned for speeches made in the

court-room as in the public forum The role of speechmaking

varies greatly by legal system and by individual cases

and settings A lawyer addressing the U.S Supreme

Court, for example, will use different rhetorical tactics

than a lawyer addressing a jury in a criminal trial A

legal speech can be a calm recounting of the evidence

and law, or a passionate appeal meant to stir a jury or

a judge Lawyers are not the only ones to have

spo-ken in legal settings Some systems of law have also

allowed the accused to make a statement Even the

repressive legal system of the Soviet Union allowed the

dissident Natan Sharansky to speak at his trial Persons

condemned to death have even spoken immediately

before their executions, maintaining their innocence

or demonstrating their repentance for their crimes

King Charles I of England’s moving speech from the

scaffold had a great influence on hearers and

subse-quent readers

Legal and political systems are intertwined, and some of the greatest political speakers from the ancient

world to today have also been effective legal

speak-ers Cicero’s speeches at trials were preserved

along-side his political speeches in the roman Senate In the

19th century Daniel Webster, among many others, was

known for his triumphs in the courtroom as well as

the U.S Congress The skills of a trial lawyer—effective

advocacy and the ability to sway hearers by combining

reason with passion—are often the skills of a political

speaker as well

sPeechmaking and gender

For most of history, the principal realms of oratory—

politics, religion, and the law—have been reserved for

males Many societies defined the “public sphere” as

male and relegated women to the “private,” or

“domes-tic,” sphere The outspoken man has been praised, the

outspoken woman often depicted as a screeching

harri-of England The slow opening harri-of political and religious activism and leadership to women in the 20th century has led to a surge of women’s speaking Women such as Golda Meir of Israel, Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, and Aung San Suu Kyi of Burma now lead republics, serve

in legislatures, head political parties and movements, and make their voices heard in public assemblies, court-rooms, and religious gatherings

the art oF “rhetoric”

Since speechmaking has been so important to human society, people have studied how to do it most effectively

With its roots in ancient Greece and rome, this study

is called “rhetoric”—the science of persuasive speech

rhetoric attracted some of the greatest minds of the ancient world, including Aristotle and Cicero, and was part of the core curriculum of ancient schools In the Middle Ages, there was less interest in Latin rhetoric, but it was revived during the renaissance renaissance

“Humanists,” namely, students of the ancient Greeks and romans and their surviving texts, viewed rhetoric

as one of the most precious legacies of the ancient world, and they promoted its study in the schools they founded

rhetorical skill was intimately associated with ship, and it was taught to the upper classes, who were expected to fill positions of authority in state, church, and private enterprise

leader-We owe the preservation of some of the finest speeches of the ancient Western world to their use as texts in rhetoric classes For centuries after the issues they had originally addressed had fallen into dust, stu-dents memorized and declaimed the orations of Cicero, Demosthenes, and their peers rhetoricians taught the use of various “figures of speech” and different speaking styles, from the lush, wordy “Asiatic” style to the terse, unadorned “Attic” style They instructed their pupils on which styles were appropriate for different occasions

They also taught the mechanics of speechmaking, how

to speak clearly with the appropriate emphases, and how to hold their bodies and their hands most effec-tively Generations of boys—rhetoric was mostly taught

as a male, “public” skill—were drilled in how to speak effectively, as a skilled speaker, trained or not, could be appreciated even by those who did not agree with his position In the modern United States and other West-ern societies, rhetoric and debate continue to be taught, but now to boys and girls alike

Trang 19

xviii SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

given Some had an afterlife that could go on for

centu-ries or millennia However, this afterlife was imperfect

Like other texts, speeches originally had to be copied

by hand Each manuscript copy could take hours or

days of the labors of a skilled copyist And few copyists

were perfect—errors would creep in, and would then be

compounded as copies of copies were made And over

the centuries many speeches, like other texts, would

be lost

Beginning in the 15th century in the Western world, and earlier in east Asia, the circulation of writ-

ten texts including speeches increased vastly with the

development of the printing press Some speeches had

far more impact as printed texts than they did when

they were actually given Abraham Lincoln’s

Gettys-burg Address, coming at the end of a long day after a

two-hour speech by scholar Edward Everett, attracted

little notice at the time Today, it is considered among

the greatest speeches in American history

However reproduced, the written texts of speeches come in two forms: one a prepared text that the speaker

reads and the other a transcription of what the speaker

said In either case, the speaker is not necessarily the

author of the speech One of the most important

ques-tions to think about when looking at any written speech

is how much the speech-as-written reflects the reality of

the speech-as-spoken Composing a speech and

deliver-ing it are different skills, often possessed by different

people Many people obligated to give speeches have

no interest, energy, or time to write them For centuries

collections of sermons were sold to preachers unable

or unwilling to write their own The 20th century saw

the rise of the political speechwriter profession Few

modern politicians, particularly in the United States,

are suspected of writing their own speeches, at least

without a lot of help Traditionally the speechwriter

is expected to be a discreet figure in the background

and the speaker is treated as the author of the speech

by a polite fiction However, many speechwriters have

become celebrities themselves Theodore Sorensen,

John F Kennedy’s speechwriter, and Peggy Noonan,

who worked for ronald reagan, are two examples

reading a speech can be a pale shadow of hearing and seeing it delivered A great orator is more than just

the reader of a text By putting emphasis on certain

words and varying pitch and rhythm, a written speech

is transformed into a spoken one Not only is delivery

important, but so is gesture, and even how speakers

hold their bodies A speaker making eye contact with

his or her audience conveys a message different from

one whose eyes are lifted to the heavens Many speeches

by great speakers may read as flat and lifeless, lacking

the spark of live delivery, while the best-written speech will be powerless if the delivery is poor Speakers also often improvise or deviate from written texts Tran-scriptions of speeches are often “cleaned up” with mis-takes, hesitations, and false starts eliminated The gap between the speech-as-spoken and the speech-as-pub-lished goes back to the ancient world Ancient histori-ans like Thucydides and Sallust considered it acceptable

to vastly alter speeches, or even make them up before inserting them in their histories, as the speeches they put in the mouths of historical characters were used to reinforce the main themes and analyses of their histo-ries as a whole

sPeechmaking and technology

In its origin, speechmaking was not a technology-driven activity—all the speaker needed was a voice (preferably

a loud one), and perhaps an elevated place to stand (The terms “stump speech” and “soap-box orator” refer to some primitive ways for a speaker to be elevated above the listening crowd—tree stumps and the wooden crates

in which soap was shipped.) However, speechmaking, particularly in the 20th century, has been greatly influ-enced by the development of technology

The 20th century saw several new technologies that affected speechmaking, including loudspeakers, sound and video recording, and broadcast technology

Loudspeakers and other amplification systems meant orators were no longer restricted to the range of the human voice The loud, bawling speaker straining to make himself heard to a crowd of thousands became a memory Now a speaker could address a crowd of many thousands without raising his or her voice, though it took some time for orators to learn the new skills of the microphone

Eventually the audience did not even need to be physically present to hear a speech radio and televi-sion enabled speakers to address “virtual” audiences numbering in the millions Many, many more people will hear a politician on television or the radio during the course of his or her career than will ever hear him

or her in person Because of this, orators are ingly judged on how they come across on radio and television American political conventions, always showcases for oratory, are now organized as televi-sion spectaculars, with the hearers physically pres-ent in the convention hall a decided afterthought The real audience is the millions watching on television

increas-The new technologies have also altered speechmaking styles radio demands an intimacy epitomized by U.S

president Franklin Delano roosevelt’s “fireside chats”

while television has increasingly put a premium on

Trang 20

short, punchy statements that can be excerpted from

a speech and endlessly repeated on video (and now on

Internet) sound bites

Television, radio, and most recently the Internet have also contributed to the development of a world-

wide audience Speakers opposing tyrannical

govern-ments in their own countries such as China’s Fang

Lizhi, an astrophysicist who actively demanded

demo-cratic reforms, can now easily address people in other

lands, hoping to gain international support for their

cause Causes not linked with a specific nation—such as

fighting AIDS, banning landmines, or even Osama bin

Laden’s call for an international jihad—are now

advo-cated in front of a worldwide audience as well

The development of recording technology has also changed speechmaking Speakers can make a speech

over and over again, as speeches that are captured in

sound recordings can be repeated Tapes of a speaker

can be smuggled into dictatorships, enabling him or her

to gain a mass following without even setting foot in the

country Video recordings preserve not just the words

of orations, but the speaker’s visual presentation as well

Even so, however, an image on a screen is not the same

as a live orator, and some of the immediacy of a

politi-cal speech disappears when the issues it addresses are

no longer relevant

recording technology, particularly when coupled with the rapid dissemination of audio and video files via the Internet, has also made it more difficult for political speakers Gaffes—misstatements, slips of the tongue, and other statements that hurt rather than help the speaker—are now repeated endlessly, such as American presidential candidate Howard Dean’s famous “scream”

following his defeat in the Iowa caucuses in 2004 (Some have even blamed the “scream” for Dean’s failure as a candidate.) It is also harder for speakers to get away with the time-honored technique of delivering differ-ent messages to different audiences Now anything a speaker says within range of even a simple device, such

as a cell phone, can instantly be sent to a worldwide audience, often one with very different concerns than the speaker’s immediate audience

All history has been described as a struggle against silence and forgetting The words of the speakers in this collection are eloquent testimony that that struggle is worth fighting

—William E BurnsInstructor, George Washington University

Trang 21

AS

Iam very grateful to acknowledge the historians, editors, and wise advisers and

assis-tants who helped me along the way: With his remarkable knowledge of world history, Bill Burns was a fount of information and excellent ideas My capable editors, Claudia Schaab and Melissa Cullen-DuPont, with Alexandra Lo Re, made the entire process

as pleasant as possible My hardworking research assistant, Natalie Deibel, and photo researcher, Phinney McIntire, pitched in when time was pressing Also providing leads and suggestions, translations, and all-around wisdom were Colin Archer, Dennis Bar-ton, Jane Dorfman, Susan Douglas, Elaine English, Ruth Feldman, Darra Goldstein, Richard Knight, Peter Lee, Gareth Lloyd, Will McIntire, Keith Patman, Hiraku Shi-moda, Richard Thornton, and the reference and interlibrary loan staff at Arlington County Libraries Thank you all!

Acknowledgments

Trang 22

Arranged chronologically, Speeches in World History

treats the development of speaking as part of the

development of human society Readers can gain fresh

perspective on significant events of history, and even of

our own time, by reading the words of speakers who made

or witnessed the great changes of the moment

Readers of Speeches in World History can become

better speakers themselves by observing how the orators

arranged their arguments, adapted topics to diverse

audi-ences, and engaged hearers with powerful appeals to

rea-son and feeling

A wide variety of genre and geography should allow

readers to find speeches of interest to them personally

The 200 selections come from 48 countries and include

political addresses, gallows speeches, eulogies, sermons,

debates, and the speeches of commanders before battle

ORGANIZATION

The book is divided into six chapters based on the eras

used in the National Standards for World History: Ancient

World (to 550 ..), Expanding World (550–1450), The

First Global Age (1450–1750), The Age of Revolution and

Empire (1750–1900), Crisis and Achievement (1900–1950),

and The Contemporary World (1950 to the present)

Each chapter includes an introductory essay setting

the speeches in an overall historical context Each speech

is preceded by a fact box that lists the name of the speaker;

the speaker’s birth/death or reign dates; and the title,

loca-tion, and date of the speech Each also includes an

intro-Spatial limitations have sometimes prevented the

inclusion of an entire speech In those cases, Speeches in

World History includes excerpts covering the most

impor-tant or the most famous and influential passages

ILLUSTRATIONS

Seventy-five illustrations shed light on the speakers’ sonalities and historical place, from a mosaic of Alexander the Great to the very young Mohandas Gandhi in his first law office to cold-war opponents Reagan and Gorbachev raising a toast at a summit dinner

per-RHETORICAL DEVICES AND FAMOUS LINES

Because so much of the beauty and power of ing comes from the use of rhetorical devices, frequent sidebars use examples from the speeches to illustrate 44 different rhetorical devices, such as metaphor, parallelism, antistrophe, rhetorical question, and hyperbole In some examples you may find more than one type of device.Rhetorical devices are tools an orator may use to make sure he or she engages the audience They help draw the audience’s attention to the points the speaker wants to make, and even arouse emotion in the listeners Many of these devices are commonly used in writing and even in daily speech Others—and there are dozens of them—may require more effort to use Do not be intimidated by their unusual names, many of them Greek While a few rhe-torical devices are invaluable to a brilliant speech (or a

speechmak-How to Use This Book

Trang 23

xxii SPEECHES IN WORLD HISTORY

APPENDIXES

The appendixes include three essays to aid students in

working with speeches and speechmaking The first,

“Writing a Persuasive Speech,” describes the process

of choosing a topic; constructing the speech with an

assertion, supporting arguments, and conclusion

(per-oration); and using rhetorical devices to persuade an

audience of the speaker’s sincerity and to arouse their

emotions

“Delivering a Great Speech” covers such

con-cerns as practicing the speech beforehand (even using

the speeches in this book for “declamation”), pacing, demeanor, and appropriate language

“Working with Speeches as Primary Sources” offers

a number of issues to consider when using a speech in historical research: the speaker’s point of view and mes-sage, choice of language, the audience, the occasion, and possible bias

At the back, readers will find a general bibliography including both print and electronic publications and a variety of indexes, including lists of speeches by title, orator, and nationality of the speaker; a list of the fea-tured rhetorical devices; and a comprehensive index

Trang 24

THE ANCIENT WORLD

(to ca 550 C.E )

Trang 26

In the period to 550 . many of the great traditions and

religions of civilization were built Hinduism, Judaism,

Buddhism, Greek philosophy, Confucianism, Daoism, and

Christianity were all formed in this period Although it

also saw the invention, improvement and spread of many

forms of writing, the spoken word remained the

princi-pal vehicle of communication The Buddha, Confucius,

Socrates, the prophets of Israel, and Jesus are all known

to us not by their writings, but by their spoken words

remembered and written down by their disciples

The early history of humanity is marked by such

advances as the discovery of fire and agriculture The

invention of agriculture enabled much denser populations,

and eventually cities evolved, at first in the great river

val-leys of the Tigris and Euphrates in Mesopotamia, the Nile

in Egypt, the Indus in India, and the Yangtze in China

Along with these cities arose more complex religious

sys-tems that led people to move beyond the simple hope that

the gods would be favorable to them to ask questions about

the right way to live There also developed political

societ-ies, creating the demand for political leadership and the

ability to articulate politics in words The words of rulers

such as China’s Duke of Zhou (r 1043–1036 ...) and

King Darius of Persia (r 521–486 ...) helped define the

missions of their governments for centuries

RELIGIOUS AND

PHILOSOPHICAL SPEAKERS

One of the most important changes in human history

was the rise of religions focusing on individual salvation

“Buddha” is a title meaning “enlightened one”) Buddhism was the first religion to produce a body of sermons Sid-dhartha Gautama, the Buddha, was known as a preacher, and his profound new message was disseminated through the spoken word The Buddha’s “Fire Sermon” and “Bena-res Sermon” (the latter included here) became funda-mental Buddhist texts and set the pattern for legions of Buddhist preachers in the following centuries

Public speaking was also important to the Buddha’s contemporaries, the Jewish prophets in Israel Although

nowadays the word prophet is often used to refer to

some-one who predicts the future, that was only a small part of

a prophet’s task Prophets such as Jeremiah, who began preaching in Jerusalem in 628 ..., viewed themselves as inspired by God to proclaim His will on earth They called the Jewish people not merely to correctly and faithfully perform ritual and sacrifice, but also to lead moral and faithful lives and to build a society pleasing to God The prophets denounced the corruption of their own times in

a way that resonated for many centuries among Jews and Christians, and their message continues to inspire to this very day

The people of both India and Israel sought quence primarily in religious contexts The first societies

elo-to break away from a fundamentally religious approach were China and Greece At the end of the sixth century

.. China produced the philosophy of Confucianism, which set forth a plan for an ideal social order without reference to the divine Greece produced a series of intel-

lectual innovators, philosophers, literally “lovers of

wis-Introduction to the Ancient World

Trang 27

2 SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

the universe Like Jeremiah and the Buddha, Socrates

was known as a speaker—there are no references to

written works by him His student and greatest follower,

Plato, wrote a long series of dialogues in which Socrates

expounded on the truths of philosophy The culture of

Greek philosophy remained strongly oral throughout

the history of the classical world Debates between

lead-ing philosophers were major spectator events in Greek

cities

Political eloquence in greece

and rome

At the heart of the classical Greek city was the agora, a

public place for speaking The roman republic, which

fol-lowed in the footsteps of the Greek cities in many ways,

called their similar space the forum The agora and the

forum became synonymous with a tradition of oratory

Many political careers were built on the ability to stand

up in front of a Greek assembly or the roman Senate or

Assembly of the People and give a powerful, persuasive

speech Many Greek and roman speakers—particularly

Demosthenes of Athens (ca 384–322 b.c.e.) and Marcus

Tullius Cicero of rome (106–43 b.c.e.)—have become

legendary Their speeches, including Demosthenes’ “On

the Crown” and Cicero’s “First Oration against Catiline,”

were studied in schools and became models for orators

for many centuries after

So important was persuasive speech that the sical era produced the discipline of rhetoric, one of

clas-the major branches of clas-the liberal arts Elite boys were

trained in it in order to participate in public affairs

rhetoric included the study of figures of speech and

how to construct a persuasive argument, as well as

prac-tical advice for speakers on how to make themselves

heard and put their points across most effectively

Another discipline that was marked by the tance of speech was the writing of history Greek his-

impor-torians such as Herodotus and Thucydides of the fifth

century b.c.e included speeches as important parts of

their histories However, the speeches found in their

works were not always simple transcriptions of what

was actually said The Greeks thought part of a

histo-rian’s job was composing polished speeches that clearly

laid out the fundamental issues at stake in historical

conflicts as well as the character of the speaker

Some-times the speeches were embellishments of the actual

speeches given at the time, and sometimes they were

completely fabricated by the historian roman

histo-rians such as Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus of the first

cen-turies b.c.e and c.e inherited this practice from their

Greek role models Speaking was also important in the

law The idea of evidence was not as developed in the

ancient world as it is today, and many a case hung on which party could make the most persuasive oration

The great speakers of Greek and roman politics were often also skilled and highly sought-after lawyers

The city-states of Greece fought off the mighty sian Empire in the fifth century b.c.e., but they were caught in a brutal series of wars with each other The most important of these was the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta from 431 to 404 b.c.e

Per-As chronicled by one of Greece’s greatest historians, Thucydides, the war prompted the Athenian political leader Pericles’ memorable account of the greatness of Athens However, Pericles died of disease before the war ended, and it was Sparta that carried away the victory

Several of Socrates’ students became part of the group

of Spartan collaborators who ruled Athens after the defeat, the “Thirty Tyrants.” The Athenian democracy was restored after the overthrow of the collaborators and it was this democracy that condemned Socrates to death—an act that may have been political payback for his association with the “Tyrants.”

The Spartan victory did not end the wars of the Greek cities, and after they exhausted each other they were conquered in the fourth century b.c.e by the northern kingdom of Macedonia under Philip II and his son Alexander the Great, considered by many to be the greatest military leader in history Alexander went on to conquer the still formidable Persian Empire and spread Greek culture and the Greek language from Egypt to northern India It was not defeat that caused him to turn back from India, but the fact that his exhausted soldiers would no longer follow him Soon after Alex-ander’s death in 323 b.c.e., his empire fragmented into several kingdoms, referred to as the “Hellenistic” mon-archies The older city-states like Athens were either absorbed by the new kingdoms or found themselves politically marginalized The change was not a good one for Greek eloquence In the Hellenistic kingdoms a poli-tician advanced not through public speechmaking in front of his peers or the people but through cultivating a private relationship with the monarch Oratory became

a pastime for education or public entertainment

rome From rePublic to emPire

Like the city-states earlier, the Hellenistic monarchies sapped their strength through endless wars with each other The power that would eventually sweep them away was rome rome grew from a backward city on the Tiber river in Italy to an empire that encompassed the entire Mediterranean world and much more, even-tually stretching from the border of Scotland to the border of Persia by the second century c.e For centu-

Trang 28

ries as it grew, rome was a republic in which ultimate

power lay in the hands of the Senate The word “senate”

literally means a gathering of old men, although the

roman Senate included many younger members of the

ruling class as well The Senate and the other important

political grouping, the Assembly of the roman People,

could be swayed by eloquent speakers Speechmaking

was also important in elections and for generals such as

Publius Cornelius Scipio—who fought the Carthaginian

general Hannibal in the Second Punic War (218–202

b.c.e.)—when addressing their soldiers Every roman

politician was expected to be a good speaker and every

boy of the roman elite was trained in oratory

The great age of political oratory in rome ended the same way it had in Greece—with the transition from a

republic to a monarchy The roman republic, unable

to handle the transition from ruling a small city-state

to vast territories in Europe, Africa, and Asia, fell after

its own civil wars in the first century b.c.e Political

and military leaders including Marius, Sulla, Catiline,

Cicero, Pompey, and Julius Caesar contended for power

Eventually the republic was overthrown by Julius’s

nephew, Augustus Caesar, who became the first roman

emperor in the year 27 b.c.e It was no coincidence that

Cicero lost his life at the hands of the new leaders of

rome His kind of oratory would have no place in the

new monarchy

The eloquence of the new roman Empire was only

a pale shadow of the old republic’s, but not all

politi-cal speechmaking died out roman emperors such as

Claudius used speeches to announce their policies, but

they were addressing subjects, not peers A first century

c.e historian of the empire, Cornelius Tacitus,

contin-ued to incorporate speeches into his histories,

includ-ing the words of enemies of rome such as Boudica, the

warrior queen of the Iceni, and Caratacus, the ruler of

southern Britain, as well as roman champions such as

Gnaeus Julius Agricola, his father-in-law Flavius

Jose-phus, a Jewish historian also of the first century c.e.,

did the same, incorporating the last speech of the

defi-ant rebel and leader of the Jewish revolt against rome,

El’azar ben Yair, in his The Jewish War.

the birth oF christianity

Almost at the same historical moment as the roman

republic and its great tradition of public speaking was

dying, another tradition of religious eloquence was

being born This was the Christian sermon ing on Jewish practice, preaching goes as far back in Christianity as Jesus Christ himself, who, like the Buddha, was renowned as a persuasive preacher His most famous utterance is the “Sermon on the Mount,”

Draw-which has become a prototypical sermon as well as

a source of moral challenge and reflection for many generations of Christians Christianity spread ini-tially among the urban lower classes of the roman cities, many of whom were illiterate (particularly women, who seem to have been attracted to the new religion more than their male contemporaries, pos-sibly because they had less involvement in the “pub-lic” cults of official paganism) Speaking, whether to crowds in the agora or to smaller, clandestine groups during periods of persecution, was essential to spread-ing the Christian message

Probably the most important event in the history

of the roman Empire after its founding was the tion of Christianity as its official religion around the year 312 This decision, made by the Emperor Constan-tine, greatly increased the power and prestige of Chris-tian bishops and priests, who were able to address far wider audiences Preachers such as John Chrysostom

adop-in the Greek-speakadop-ing East and Ambrose of Milan adop-in the Latin-speaking West were eventually able to defy the emperors themselves The thoughtful, powerful ser-mons of Augustine of Hippo became one of the founda-tions of Western Christianity Classical paganism held out stubbornly for over a century, but it eventually died out

The adoption of Christianity may have slowed the decay of the roman Empire, but it could not stop it By the end of the fifth century, the roman Empire in the west had vanished, replaced by a series of non-roman kingdoms with little interest in polished rhetoric The learned tradition in Latin nearly vanished, but the case was different for Greek Before its fall, the roman Empire had been divided into eastern and western halves, and the eastern empire with its capital at Constantinople (modern Istanbul) survived its western counterpart as the Byzantine Empire The eastern area had been the Greek-speaking territory of the Empire, and it adopted Greek as its official language, eventually losing all famil-iarity with Latin The language of Demosthenes and Socrates lived on in the words of Chrysostom and the Byzantine empress Theodora

Trang 30

Speeches peeches Speeches

Trang 32

One of the five most ancient Chinese texts is the

Clas-sic of Documents, sometimes called ClasClas-sic of

His-tory It contains reports and speeches purportedly by

ancient kings and other court authorities Confucius

(551–479 ...) is supposed to have edited these texts,

and they were old when he worked on them For centuries

the Chinese people have studied these texts as important

sources of knowledge and as models for good

govern-ment The Classic of Documents begins with reports from

the legendary Chinese sage-kings Yao and Shun and

con-tinues through the Xia (2070–1600 ...) and Shang (or

Yin, 1600–1046 ...) dynasties and the early (Western)

Zhou dynasty (beginning 1045 ...) (A dynasty is a

succession of rulers from a powerful family.) King Cheng

was the second of the Western Zhou dynasty rulers; he

reigned from 1043 to 1021 ..., not long after his father,

King Wu, conquered the last Shang king King Cheng

was a child when he came to power; his father’s younger brother—Dan, the powerful duke of Zhou—assumed the regency for seven years until Cheng was old enough to

assume the Mandate of Heaven (or tianming), the

reli-gious power that entitled him to rule In the last year

of his regency, as a new city, Luoyang, was being built, the duke made this speech, the Shao Announcement, describing the mandate received by a virtuous king and his heirs as long as they ruled with wisdom and benevo-lence When a dynasty crumbled, possibly from corrup-tion or cruelty, and the family was dethroned, it was said they had lost the mandate that entitled them to govern by divine right In his speech the duke refers to the Yin, the people of the previous, defeated Shang dynasty The duke

of Zhou was one of the founding fathers of the Chinese political system; the Western Zhou dynasty he helped found would last nearly 275 years through 12 kings

Ah! August Heaven, High God, has changed his principal son and has revoked the

Mandate of this great state of Yin When a king receives the Mandate, without limit is

the grace thereof, but also without limit is the anxiety of it Ah! How can he fail to be

reverently careful!

Heaven has rejected and ended the Mandate of this great state of Yin Thus, although Yin has many former wise kings in Heaven, when their successor kings and

successor people undertook their Mandate, in the end wise and good men lived in

mis-ery Knowing that they must care for and sustain their wives and children, they then

called out in anguish to Heaven and fled to places where they could not be caught Ah!

Heaven too grieved for the people of all the lands, wanting, with affection, in giving its

Mandate to employ those who are deeply committed The king should have reverent

care for his virtue

Look at the former peoples of ancient times, the Xia Heaven guided, indulged, and cherished them, so that they would strive to understand what Heaven favors, but by this

time they have let their Mandate fall to the ground Now look at the Yin; Heaven guided

them, stayed near them, nourished them, so that they would strive to comprehend what

Heaven favors; but now they have let their Mandate fall to the ground

Now a young son succeeds to the throne; let him not, then, neglect the aged and

JK

Trang 33

8 SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

the king must not dare to be slow, but should be prudently apprehensive about what the people say

The king will come representing the High God and himself undertake [the ment here] in the midst of the lands I, Dan, say, “Let a great city be made here; may

govern-he from this place function as tgovern-he mate of August Heaven, reverently sacrificing to tgovern-he higher and lower spirits May he from this place centrally govern.” When the king has

a fully effective mandate, his governing of the people will then enjoy [Heaven’s] grace

Undertaking [the administration of] the Yin managers of affairs, the king should first associate them with our Zhou’s managers of affairs, so as to discipline their natures, and they will day by day advance

Let the king reverently function in his position; he cannot but be reverently careful of his virtue We cannot fail to mirror ourselves in the Xia; also we cannot fail to mirror our-selves in the Yin We must not presume to suppose that the Xia received the Mandate of Heaven for a fixed period of years; we must not presume to suppose that it was not going

to continue It was because they did not reverently care for their virtue that they early let their Mandate fall We must not presume to suppose that the Yin received the Mandate of Heaven for a fixed period of years; we must not presume to suppose that it was not going

to continue It was because they did not reverently care for their virtue that they early let their Mandate fall Now the king has succeeded them in receiving their Mandate; let us also, in regard to the mandate of these two states, continue it with like achievements; [if

we do,] then the king will [truly] now begin to undertake the mandate

Ah! It is like bearing a child: all depends on what happens when it is first born; one gives it oneself its allotment of [future] wisdom Now as to whether Heaven is going to give an endowment of wisdom, of good fortune or bad, or an endowment of so-and-so many years, we [just] know that now we begin the undertaking of the Mandate

Dwelling in this new city, now let the king just earnestly have reverent care for his virtue If it is virtue that the king uses, he may pray Heaven for an enduring Mandate

As he functions as king, let him not, because the common people stray and do what

is wrong, then presume to govern them by harsh capital punishments; in this way he will achieve much In being king, let him take his position in the primacy of virtue The little people will then pattern themselves on him throughout the world; the king will then become illustrious

Those above and below being zealous and careful, let them say, “As we receive Heaven’s Mandate, let it grandly be like the long years enjoyed by the Xia, and not fail

of the years enjoyed by the Yin”—in order that [as one would wish] the king, through the little people, may receive Heaven’s enduring Mandate

Source: Zhou, Duke of “The Shao Announcement.” In Sources of Chinese Tradition Vol 1, edited

by William Theodore de Bary and Irene Bloom New York: Columbia University Press, 1999,

p 35 Copyright © 1960 reprinted with permission of the publisher.

Trang 34

(ca 640–586 ...)

“O Earth, Earth, Earth, Hear the Word”

Jerusalem

605 ...

Jeremiah was born near Jerusalem, about 640 ...,

during the reign of the pious King Josiah of Judah

He became one of the major prophets of the

Chris-tian Old Testament and the Hebrew Bible He was

the author of the Book of Jeremiah, and is thought to

have written the Book of Lamentations Jeremiah felt

called to prophesy as a young man Believing that the

people had fallen away from God, he began to preach

in 628 .. He aided King Josiah in removing idols

from the temples and returning worship to the Hebrew

God He preached against immorality, false prophets,

idolatry, and social injustice After Josiah’s death,

King Necho II of Egypt attacked Jerusalem and took

Josiah’s successor, Jehoahaz (named Shallum at birth,

and uninterested in upholding his father’s reforms),

captive Jeremiah warned repeatedly that Jerusalem

faced destruction by an angry God, and that the people

of Judah must submit to their Egyptian conquerors

(and the Babylonian invasion he predicted) and await

God’s judgment To reinforce this message he wore a

wooden oxen yoke around his neck Jeremiah found

much to protest during the calamitous reign of King Jehoiakim (another son of Josiah), which began about

609 ...; among other things, Jehoiakim allowed a return to idolatry In the following speech Jeremiah prophesied that Jehoiakim would be buried like an ass The king resented these speeches, and when he received a written copy of one, he burned it page by page; the prophet he threw into prison No one listened

to Jeremiah’s prophecies that Babylon would capture the city (as Nebuchadnezzar II did in 598 .. and

in 586, destroying the Temple) Jehoiakim’s son and successor, Coniah, was taken into Babylonian exile, as Jeremiah also had predicted Jeremiah was an unhappy man; in religious art—such as the Sistine Chapel ceil-ing painted by Michelangelo—he is shown sad and weeping “Mine heart within me is broken,” he said (Jeremiah 22) Today, a “jeremiad” is a long, bitter lam-entation on society’s ills, usually with warning of ruin The “throne of David” refers to the revered King David

of Israel, who reigned earlier, 1007 to 1005 .. ead was a fertile region east of the Jordan River

Gil-Thus says the Lord: “Go down to the house of the king of Judah, and there speak this

word, and say, ‘Hear the word of the Lord, O king of Judah, you who sit on the throne of

David, you and your servants and your people who enter these gates!’”

Thus says the Lord: “Execute judgment and righteousness, and deliver the dered out of the hand of the oppressor Do no wrong and do no violence to the stranger,

plun-the faplun-therless, or plun-the widow, nor shed innocent blood in this place

“For if you indeed do this thing, then shall enter the gates of this house, riding

on horses and in chariots, accompanied by servants and people, kings who sit on the

I will prepare destroyers against you, every one with his weapons; they shall cut down

your choice cedars and cast them into the fire

JK

Trang 35

10 SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

Weep not for the dead, nor bemoan him;

weep bitterly for him who goes away, for he shall return no more, nor see his native country

For thus says the Lord concerning Shallum the son of Josiah, king of Judah, who reigned instead of Josiah his father, who went from this place: “He shall not return here anymore, but

he shall die in the place where they have led him captive, and shall see this land no more

“Woe to him who builds his house by unrighteousness and his chambers by injustice, who uses his neighbor’s service without wages and gives him nothing for his work, who says,

‘I will build myself a wide house with spacious chambers, and cut out windows for it, paneling

it with cedar and painting it with vermilion.’

“Shall you reign because you enclose self in cedar? Did not your father eat and drink, and do justice and righteousness? Then it was well with him He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well Was not this know-ing Me?” says the Lord

your-“Yet your eyes and your heart are for ing but your covetousness, for shedding innocent blood, and practicing oppression and violence.”

noth-Therefore thus says the Lord concerning Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, king of Judah:

“They shall not lament for him, saying, ‘Alas, my brother!’ or ‘Alas, my sister!’ They shall not lament for him, saying, ‘Alas, master!’ or ‘Alas, his glory!’

“He shall be buried with the burial of a donkey, dragged and cast out beyond the gates of Jerusalem

“Go up to Lebanon, and cry out, and lift up your voice in Bashan; cry from Abarim, for all your lovers are destroyed

“I spoke to you in your prosperity, but you said, ‘I will not hear.’ This has been your manner from your youth, that you did not obey My voice

“The wind shall eat up all your rulers, and your lovers shall go into captivity; surely then you will be ashamed and humiliated for all your wickedness

“O inhabitant of Lebanon, making your nest in the cedars, how gracious will you

be when pangs come upon you, like the pain of a woman in labor?

“As I live,” says the Lord, “though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the signet on My right hand, yet I would pluck you off; and I will give you into the hand

of those who seek your life, and into the hand of those whose face you fear—the hand

of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and the hand of the Chaldeans

“So I will cast you out, and your mother who bore you, into another country where you were not born; and there you shall die But to the land to which they desire to return, there they shall not return

“Is this man Coniah a despised, broken idol—a vessel in which is no pleasure? Why are they cast out, he and his descendants, and cast into a land which they do not know?”

O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord!

Thus says the Lord: “Write this man down as childless, a man who shall not prosper

in his days; for none of his descendants shall prosper, sitting on the throne of David, and ruling anymore in Judah.”

Source: Jeremiah, Chapter 22 New King James Version® Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson,

Inc Used by permission All rights reserved.

RhetoRical Device apostrophe: Breaking off to address a person, or

group, separate from the speaker’s audience

O earth, earth, earth,

hear the word of the Lord!—Jeremiah

O ye immortal gods, where on earth are we? In

what city are we living?—Marcus Tullius Cicero

Lafayette, we are here —Charles Stanton

Spirits of Moctezuma, Cacamatzín, Cuauhtémoc,

Xicotencatl, and Caltzontzín, take pride in

this august assembly, and celebrate this happy

moment in which your sons have congregated to

avenge your insults —José María Morelos

Trang 36

Six years after secretly murdering his brother

Smer-dis in order to reign unchallenged, the mad Persian

king Cambyses II (son of Cyrus the Great) died An

imposter who claimed to be Smerdis pronounced

him-self king at Media (the portion of the Persian Empire

that is now Iran) Cambyses’ father-in-law detected the

fraud and, with several noblemen, killed the

impos-ter on September 29, 522 .. Among the

conspira-tors was 29-year-old Darius, who was the son of the

satrap (governor) of Parthia, and cousin to

Camby-ses The seven conspirators debated how the kingdom

should be ruled now that both Smerdis and

Camby-ses II were dead One recommended “the rule of the

many” (democracy), saying monarchs were too likely to

become tyrants; instead, “raise the people to power,” he

said Another suggested government only by “the best

men” (oligarchy, or rule by a select group among

citi-zens), as the people were too ignorant and unbridled

Darius took another view—rule by “the very best man

in the whole state” (monarchy) The seven elected ius as their king, although the Greek historian Herodo-

Dar-tus, who recorded the events in The Histories, relates

that the kingship was decided by which man’s horse neighed first the following morning (Some modern scholars think the entire imposter story may have been invented by Darius to justify his taking power.) Darius was soon known as Darius the Great He became a con-queror of many lands and an able administrator of a vast empire, which included what is today Afghanistan, Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the Pal-estinian territories, in addition to parts of Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia, and the Black Sea coasts

of Bulgaria, Romania, and Ukraine His system of erning, using satraps (subordinate officials) to rule the

gov-20 Persian provinces, was so effective that Alexander the Great later used it as well Darius attempted to add Greece to his realm—embarking on the Persian Wars

to do so—but he died without succeeding

(ca 549–486 ...)

“The Rule of One”

Media, Persia October 522 ...

Take these three forms of government—democracy, oligarchy, and monarchy—and let

them each be at their best, I maintain that monarchy far surpasses the other two

What government can possibly be better than that of the very best man in the whole state? The counsels of such a man are like himself, and so he governs the mass of

the people to their heart’s content; while at the same time his measures against

evildo-ers are kept more secret than in other states

Contrariwise, in oligarchies, where men vie with each other in the service of the commonwealth, fierce enmities are apt to arise between man and man, each wishing to

be leader, and to carry his own measures; whence violent quarrels come, which lead to

open strife, often ending in bloodshed Then monarchy is sure to follow; and this too

shows how far that rule surpasses all others

Again, in a democracy, it is impossible but that there will be malpractices These malpractices, however, do not lead to enmities, but to close friendships, which are

formed among those engaged in them, who must hold well together to carry on their

villainies And so things go on until a man stands forth as champion of the

com-monalty, and puts down the evildoers Straightway the author of so great a service is

admired by all, and from being admired soon comes to be appointed king; so that here

JK

Trang 37

12 SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

ered our freedom for us, my sentence is that we keep to the rule of one Even apart from this, we ought not to change the laws of our forefathers when they work fairly, for to

do so is not well

Source: Herodotus The History of Herodotus Translated by George rawlinson New York:

Appleton & Co., 1889, p 395.

Darius I the Great receives his subjects in a detail of a relief in the Treasury of the Palace at

Persepolis, Persia (Iran), 4–486 b.c.e (SEF/Art Resource, NY)

Trang 38

( 563–483 ...)

Sermon at Benares

Benares, India

ca 521 ...

Siddhartha Gautama was born about 563 ..., a

minor king’s son, in a kingdom in what is now Nepal

According to tradition, even as a baby Siddhartha was

destined to be a great ruler or a great holy man Although

his family wished him to become the former, he became

Gautama Buddha, the wandering thinker regarded as the

father of Buddhism With five companions, Gautama set

out searching for enlightenment He joined an ascetic, or

self-denying, religious group, but after living a life of such

complete deprivation that he was near death, he realized

asceticism would not lead to Truth He sat beneath a fig

tree and resolved not to leave until he had discovered

the true path to Nirvana, a state of higher

conscious-ness—free from human emotion and suffering He found

Nirvana in the Middle Way, between asceticism and

worldliness While meditating, Buddha (which means

“Enlightened One”) discovered the Four Noble Truths

These truths are: “All life is suffering; suffering is caused

by desire; to eliminate suffering eliminate desire; and to eliminate desire, follow the Eightfold Path.” In his Ser-mon at Benares, often compared to Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, Buddha was responding to his companion’s greet-ing The five bhikkhus (monks) had seen him approach; from his appearance they concluded he had given up the ascetic life and “become a man who lives in abundance and indulges in the pleasures of worldliness.” They hailed him as a friend, not a holy man In this address he lays out the eight paths that lead ultimately to the cessation of suffering: right view, right aspiration, right speech, right behavior, right livelihood, right effort, right thoughts, and right contemplation Tathagata was the name Buddha used when he referred to himself; it means “one who has thus gone,” and was meant to indicate his passage from being to nonbeing, in which there is no personal self The

Sermon is from the gospel Samyutta-Nikaya, or

Con-nected Sayings

Do not call the Tathagata by his name nor address him as “friend,” for he is the Buddha,

the Holy One The Buddha looks with a kind heart equally on all living beings, and they

therefore call him “Father.” To disrespect a father is wrong; to despise him, is wicked

The Tathagata, does not seek salvation in austerities, but neither does he for that reason indulge in worldly pleasures, nor live in abundance The Tathagata has found

the middle path

There are two extremes, O bhikkhus, which the man who has given up the world ought not to follow—the habitual practice, on the one hand, of self-indulgence which

is unworthy, vain and fit only for the worldly-minded; and the habitual practice, on the

other hand, of self-mortification, which is painful, useless and unprofitable

Neither abstinence from fish or flesh, nor going naked, nor shaving the head, nor wearing matted hair, nor dressing in a rough garment, nor covering oneself with dirt,

nor sacrificing to Agni, will cleanse a man who is not free from delusions

Reading the Vedas, making offerings to priests, or sacrifices to the gods, fication by heat or cold, and many such penances performed for the sake of immortality,

self-morti-these do not cleanse the man who is not free from delusions

Anger, drunkenness, obstinacy, bigotry, deception, envy, self-praise, disparaging

JK

Trang 39

14 SPEECHES IN WOrLD HISTOrY

A middle path, O bhikkhus, avoiding the two extremes, has been discovered by the Tathagata—a path which opens the eyes, and bestows understanding, which leads to peace of mind, to the higher wisdom, to full enlightenment, to Nirvana!

What is that middle path, O bhikkhus, avoiding these two extremes, discovered

by the Tathagata—that path which opens the eyes, and bestows understanding, which leads to peace of mind, to the higher wisdom, to full enlightenment, to Nirvana?

Let me teach you, O bhikkhus, the middle path, which keeps aloof from both extremes By suffering, the emaciated devotee produces confusion and sickly thoughts

in his mind Mortification is not conducive even to worldly knowledge; how much less

to a triumph over the senses!

He who fills his lamp with water will not dispel the darkness, and he who tries to light a fire with rotten wood will fail And how can anyone be free from self by leading

a wretched life, if he does not succeed in quenching the fires of lust, if he still hankers after either worldly or heavenly pleasures But he in whom self has become extinct is free from lust: he will desire neither worldly nor heavenly pleasures, and the satisfaction

of his natural wants will not defile him However, let him be moderate, let him eat and drink according to the needs of the body

Sensuality is enervating: the “self-indulgent” man is a slave to pleasure to his sions, and pleasure-seeking is degrading and vulgar

pas-But to satisfy the necessities of life is not evil To keep the body in good health is a duty for otherwise we shall not be able to trim the lamp of wisdom, and keep our mind strong and clear Water surrounds the lotus-flower, but does not wet its petals

This is the middle path, O bhikkhus, that keeps aloof from both extremes

The spokes of the wheel are the rules of pure conduct: justice is the uniformity of their length, wisdom is the tire; modesty and thoughtfulness are the hub in which the immovable axle of truth is fixed

He who recognizes the existence of suffering, its cause, its remedy, and its cessation has fathomed the four noble truths He will walk in the right path

right views will be the torch to light his way right aspirations will be his guide right speech will be his dwelling-place on the road His gait will be straight,

RhetoRical Device Polysyndeton: using a series of conjunctions like “and,” “or,” “nor” between each

word or phrase They provide formality and slow down the rush of thought

Neither abstinence from fish or flesh, nor going naked, nor shaving the head, nor wearing matted hair, nor dressing in a rough garment, nor covering oneself with dirt, nor sacrificing to Agni, will cleanse

a man who is not free from delusions —Gautama Buddha

This right of the journalist is as sacred, as necessary, as imprescriptible,

as the right of the legislator —Victor Hugo

No realistic American can expect from a dictator’s peace international generosity, or return of true independence, or world disarmament,

or freedom of expression, or freedom of religion—

or even good business —Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Trang 40

for it is right behavior His refreshments will be the right way of earning his live-lihood right efforts will be his steps, right thoughts his breath; and right con-templation will give him the peace that follows in his footprints.

Now, this, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning suffering:

Birth is attended with pain, decay is painful, disease is painful, death is pain-ful Union with the unpleasant is painful, painful is separation from the pleasant, and any craving that is unsatisfied, that too is painful In brief, bodily condi-tions which spring from attachment are painful

This, then, O bhikkus, is the noble truth concerning suffering

Now this, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the origin of suffering:

Verily, it is that craving which causes the renewal of existence, accompanied by sensual delight, seeking satisfaction now here, now there, the craving for the grati-fication of the passions, the craving for a future life, and the craving for happiness

in this life

This, then, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the origin of suffering

Now this, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the destruction of suffering:

Verily, it is the destruction, in which no passion remains, of this very thirst; it is the laying aside of, the being free from, the dwelling no longer upon this thirst

This then, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the destruction of suffering

Now this, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the way which leads to the destruction of sorrow Verily! it is this noble eightfold path: that is to say:

right views; right aspirations; right speech; right behavior; right livelihood; right effort; right thoughts; and right contemplation

This, then, O bhikkhus, is the noble truth concerning the destruction of sorrow By the practice of loving kindness I have attained liberation of heart, and thus I am assured that I shall never return in renewed births I have even now attained Nirvana

Source: Buddha “Sermon at Benares.” The Gospel of Buddha Edited by Paul Carus Chicago:

Open Court Publishing Co., 1894, p 49.

Gautama Buddha founded Buddhism in India in the sixth century b.c.e Buddhism followed the silk road to China and reached korea in 32 c.e and Japan in 46 c.e The Great

Buddha in kamakura, Japan, was built in 252 (Henry William

Fu/Shutterstock)

Ngày đăng: 14/12/2018, 15:05