Describe how the changing world environment is leading to an increased focus on international financial reporting standards IFRS.. generally accepted principles GAAP if the issuers use
Trang 2Slide
11-2
1 Describe how the changing world environment is leading to an increased
focus on international financial reporting standards (IFRS).
3 List some of the milestones that must be achieved before the SEC will
require adoption of IFRS.
4 Describe the SEC’s work plan for incorporating IFRS into the financial
reporting system for U.S issuers.
5 Describe three major joint convergence topics between the IFRS and
FASB.
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives
Trang 3Slide
11-3
6 List the steps that a non-U.S company must follow to list its shares on a
U.S stock market.
7. Explain the role of form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
8 Indicate the role of American Depository Receipts in the issuing of
securities of non-U.S companies in the United States.
Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives
Trang 4Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
June 2007 , eliminated the need for foreign private
investors to reconcile their financial statements to U.S
generally accepted principles (GAAP) if the issuers use International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
July 2007 , voted unanimously to publish a concept
release for comment on allowing U.S issuers to prepare their financial statements using IFRS as issued by the IASB.
LO 1 Increased focus on International Accounting Standards.
Trang 5Slide
11-5
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 1 Increased focus on International Accounting Standards.
September 2002 , FASB and the IASB issued their Norwalk Agreement including a “memorandum of understanding.”
April and October 2005; November 2009 , FASB and the IASB reaffirmed their commitment to the convergence of U.S GAAP and IFRS
September 2008 , IASB and FASB issued a progress report and timetable for completion, recognizing the relevance of a roadmap for the removal of the reconciliation requirement for non-U.S companies using IFRS
Trang 6Slide
11-6
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 1 Increased focus on International Accounting Standards.
November 14, 2008 , SEC released a roadmap for the adoption of IFRS by U.S issuers.
February 24, 2010 , SEC issued a release, Commission
Statement in Support of Convergence and Global Accounting Standards The SEC stated its continued belief that a single
set of high-quality globally accepted accounting standards would benefit U.S investors.
May 26, 2011 , SEC released a staff paper discussing possible work plans for incorporating IFRS into the financial reporting system.
Trang 7Slide
11-7
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 3 SEC milestones to be achieved for adoption of IFRS.
The basis for considering the use of IFRS by U.S issuers
include the following milestones
1 Improvements in accounting standards;
2 Accountability and funding of the IASC Foundation;
3 Improvement in the ability to use interactive data for IFRS reporting;
4 Education and training relating to IFRS.
These four milestones relate to issues that need to be
addressed before adoption of IFRS by U.S entities can occur.
Trang 82.Full adoption of IFRS following staged transition over several years.
3.An option for U.S issuers to apply IFRS.
4.Retaining U.S GAAP with continued convergence efforts, with or without
a specific mechanism in place to promote alignment with IFRS.
5.Retaining a U.S standard-setter (condorsement)
Work Plan for Incorporating IFRS
LO 4 SEC’s work plan for incorporating IFRS
Trang 9Slide
11-9
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 1 Increased focus on International Accounting Standards.
It is important that the accounting standards
be established under a robust, independent process that includes
careful consideration of possible alternative approaches
be established with due process, which allows for input from and
consideration of views expressed by affected parties, including investors
are timely to keep standards current and reflect emerging accounting
issues.
produced are capable of improving the accuracy and effectiveness of
financial reporting and the protection of investors.
Improvement in Accounting Standards
Trang 10Slide
11-10
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
The IASB is established to develop global standards for financial reporting
Oversight is by the IASC Foundation, a stand-alone, not-for profit
organization, which is responsible for the activities of the IASB and
is governed by 22 trustees whose backgrounds are geographically diverse
Initially IASB operations were financed through voluntary
contributions by approximately 200 organizations
A majority of the IASB’s finances are now based on national financing
regimes, proportionate to a country’s relative GNP.
Further progress on financing is essential to safeguard the IFRS
Foundation’s position as the world’s independent accounting standard setter
Accountability and Funding of the IASC Foundation
LO 1 Increased focus on International Accounting Standards.
Trang 11Slide
11-11
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 3 SEC milestones to be achieved for adoption of IFRS.
In May 2008, the SEC proposed rules to require companies to
provide their financial statements to the Commission as well as on their corporate Web sites in interactive data format using the eXtensible
Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”)
In April 2011, the SEC acknowledged that it would be impossible for foreign private issuers using IFRS and filing with the SEC to file in
XBRL because the SEC had not approved the IFRS XBRL taxonomy
During March 2011, the IFRS Foundation finalized a 2011 IFRS
taxonomy but the SEC had not yet granted approval
Ability to Use Interactive Data For IFRS Reporting
Trang 12Slide
11-12
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 3 SEC milestones to be achieved for adoption of IFRS.
A requirement for U.S issuers to report in accordance with IFRS would increase the need for effective training and education about IFRS for a number of groups, including investors, accountants, auditors and
others involved in the preparation and use of financial statements, due
to differences between U.S GAAP and IFRS
Education and Training
Trang 13Slide
11-13
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 4 SEC’s work plan for incorporating IFRS
1 Full Adoption of IFRS – countries recognize IFRS as issued by
the IASB as GAAP
2 Adopt IFRS after Some Incorporation Process – allows each
country to address country-specific issues This results in the following:
Convergence approach: jurisdictions maintain their local
standards but work to converge with IFRS over time
Endorsement approach: jurisdictions incorporate individual
IFRS into local standards
Adoption Approaches
Trang 14Slide
11-14
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 4 SEC’s work plan for incorporating IFRS
3 “Condorsement” of IFRS – focus of the SEC’s work plan,
predicated on several principles:
U.S GAAP would be retained, but the FASB would incorporate
IFRS into U.S GAAP over a defined period, with a focus on minimizing transition costs
The FASB would incorporate newly issued IFRS into U.S
GAAP pursuant to some established endorsement protocol
There may be a need for U.S interpretations of IFRS on
issues that are significant in the U.S but not in the remainder of the world
Adoption Approaches
Trang 15Slide
11-15
The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS The Road To Convergence-U.S GAAP and IFRS
LO 4 SEC’s work plan for incorporating IFRS
By the end of 2011, the SEC plans to decide whether to proceed with
rules requiring some U.S public companies to file IFRS-based financial statements
The AICPA Board of Examiners announced that IFRS would be eligible for testing on the Uniform CPA Exam starting in 2011
Timing of Future Rulemaking by the Commission
Trang 16Slide
11-16
Significant Similarities and Differences
Significant Similarities and Differences
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
In general,
U.S GAAP are considered to be more rules-based, while
IFRS is considered to be more principles-based,
although this dichotomy is an over-simplification as most U.S
rules are rooted in principles, and the IASB is embracing more interpretative details of its principles over time
Trang 17Slide
11-17
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
U.S GAAP Hierarchy—Effective September 2009
Authoritative: Included in the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification
Non-Authoritative: Not-included in the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification
Exceptions: SEC registrants must also follow SEC rules and
regulations issued under the authority of federal securities laws.
Trang 18Slide
11-18
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
IFRS Hierarchy (issued by the IASB)
1 IFRS/IAS statements (8 IFRS and 41 IAS standards) and
IFRIC/SIC Interpretations (32 SIC and 14 IFRIC) SIC stands for the Standards Interpretations Committee
2 Apply a method that is relevant, reliable, represents faithfully the
financial position, the performance, and cash flows of the firm;
reflect the economic substance of the firm
3 Look to recent pronouncements of other standard setters which
use a similar conceptual framework (i.e., U.S GAAP)
4 The conceptual framework
Trang 19Slide
11-19
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Similarities and Differences between FASB and IASB
Trang 20Slide
11-20
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 21Slide
11-21
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 22Slide
11-22
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 23Slide
11-23
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 24Slide
11-24
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 25Slide
11-25
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 26Slide
11-26
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 27Slide
11-27
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
GAAP Hierarchy-U.S Versus IFRS
LO 2 Differences between IFRS and U.S GAAP.
Trang 29Slide 11-29
Trang 30Slide 11-30
Trang 31Slide 11-31
Trang 32Slide
11-32
Long-Term Convergence Issues - FASB & IASB
Long-Term Convergence Issues - FASB & IASB
Three long-term convergence issues between the FASB and
IASB
1 Accounting for leases by the lessee
2 Revenue recognition
3 Financial statement presentation
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 33Slide
11-33
Lease Accounting Convergence
Lease Accounting Convergence
Currently, the guidance for leases is provided in FASB ASC
Topic 840 – Leases and in IAS 17 under IFRS
For lessees in the United States, there are two types of leases:
operating and capital
Under IAS 17, capital leases are referred to as financing leases.
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 34Slide
11-34
Lease Accounting Convergence
Lease Accounting Convergence
While the major change will be the requirement that all leases extending beyond a year are
capitalized, the financial statement presentation and the potential changes in lease assumptions have yet to be determined.
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 35Slide
11-35
Revenue Recognition Convergence
Revenue Recognition Convergence
The IASB and the FASB are working on a project to develop a
single statement on revenue recognition for both U.S GAAP and IFRS The project is intended to improve financial reporting by:
a converging U.S and international revenue recognition
standards,
b eliminating inconsistencies in existing revenue recognition
standards and practices,
c providing clearer principles for addressing future revenue
recognition issues, and
d filling voids in existing revenue recognition guidance
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 36Slide
11-36
Revenue Recognition Convergence
Revenue Recognition Convergence
The Boards have reached some preliminary views in developing
a revenue recognition model This model would apply to
contracts with customers where a contract is an agreement
between two or more parties that creates an obligation ( does not
need to be in writing)
There are five steps in this proposed model.
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 37Slide
11-37
Revenue Recognition Convergence
Revenue Recognition Convergence
Revenue is recognized when there is an increase in the contract
asset or a decrease in the contract liability from satisfying
performance obligations (promises to transfer an asset, such as goods
or services, to the customer).
At the inception of the contract, the contract rights and the performance obligations would be equal and the net contract asset/liability would be zero Revenue is only recognized when a
Customer Consideration (Allocation) Model
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 38Slide
11-38
Financial Statement Presentation
Financial Statement Presentation
In October 2008, the FASB and the IASB released a joint discussion
paper outlining three objectives for financial statement
presentation Those proposed objectives state that information should
be presented in the financial statements in a manner that:
Portrays a cohesive financial picture of an entity’s activities
Disaggregates information so that it is useful in predicting an
entity’s future cash flows
Helps users assess an entity’s liquidity and financial flexibility
In October 2010, the Boards decided not to issue an
Exposure Draft in the first quarter of 2011, and to return to this project at a later date
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 39Slide
11-39
Current and Potential Changes to Financial Statements
Current and Potential Changes to Financial Statements
Items will be classified into the operating, investing and financing
function, income and expense items are disaggregated by nature
(economic characteristics or attributes that distinguish assets, liabilities, and income and expense items that do not respond equally to similar
economic events)
All entities would present a single statement of comprehensive
separate section
Statement of Comprehensive Income
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.
Trang 40Slide
11-40
Current and Potential Changes to Financial Statements
Current and Potential Changes to Financial Statements
It is expected that the new presentation model would include more
subtotals than are currently presented This will allow easier
comparisons of effects across the financial statements.
Illustration 11-7 provides an examples of a one-year statement of
comprehensive income prepared according to these guidelines
(generally, two years of comparable data would be required)
Statement of Comprehensive Income
LO 5 Three major convergence topics for IFRS and FASB.