Supply-Side Effects of Fiscal Policy The effects of fiscal policy on employment, potential GDP, and aggregate supply are known as supply-side effects.. An income tax decreases the supp
Trang 1T h e B i g P i c t u r e
Where we have been:
This chapter extensively uses the aggregate supply-aggregate demand model introduced in Chapter 10 It also makes use of Chapter 11’s discussion of multipliers The material on the labor market and potential GDP from Chapter
6 is important when discussing the supply-side effects of fiscal policy
Where we are going:
Chapter 14 on monetary policy completes the material on macroeconomic stabilization policies
N e w i n t h e Tw e l f t h E d i t i o n
This chapter is rich with data, which has all been updated to 2014 The At Issue section has updated content while it continues to have President Obama and Paul Ryan’s contrasting policy suggestions The Economics in the News feature at the end of the chapter discusses a 2014 article on Japan’s challenges with its debt and deficit The Worked Problem explores the short-run and long-run consequences on economic growth and other variables of an increase in infrastructural expenditure
and a decrease in taxes The AD-SAS model is used to answer the questions To
include the new Worked Problem without lengthening the chapter, some problems have been removed from the Study Plan Problem and Applications These
problems are still in the MyEconLab and are called Extra Problems
C h a p t e r
19
Trang 2Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy refers to changes in government expenditure and taxes
Fiscal policy impacts both aggregate supply and aggregate demand
I The Federal Budget
The annual statement of the outlays and receipts of the government of the United States together with the laws and regulations that approve and support those outlays and receipts
make up the federal budget The use of the federal budget to achieve macroeconomic
objectives such as full employment, sustained economic growth, and price level stability is
called fiscal policy.
The Institutions and Laws
The President submits a budget proposal to Congress Congress debates, amends, and enacts the budget The budget operates within the framework of the
Employment Act of 1946, which states: “… it is the continuing policy and
responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practicable means … to
coordinate and utilize all its plans, functions, and resources … to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power.”
The Council of Economic Advisers monitors the economy and keeps the President
and the public well informed about the current state of the economy and the best available forecasts of where it is heading
Highlights of the 2015 Budget
Receipts come from four sources: personal income taxes ($1,505 billion), social security taxes ($1,176 billion), corporate income taxes ($537 billion), and indirect taxes and other receipts ($296 billion)
Outlays are classified in three categories: transfer payments ($2,649 billion),
expenditure on goods and services ($1,030 billion), and debt interest ($479 billion)
Budget balance = Receipts – Outlays
If receipts exceed outlays, the government has a budget surplus.
If outlays exceed receipts, the government has a budget deficit.
If receipts equal outlays, the government has a balanced budget.
The U.S Budget in Historical Perspective and in Global Perspective
Since 1990, except between 1998 to 2001, the U.S government has had a budget deficit
Government debt is the total amount that the government has borrowed A
budget deficit adds to the government debt
In 2014, all of the world’s major economies except Germany had a budget deficit The newly industrialized economies of Asia had the smallest deficits while Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom (in that order) had the largest deficits as a
fraction of GDP The U.S deficit was about 5 percent of GDP
The At Issue detail presents arguments about different budget plans President Obama’s plan keeps the budget deficit constant at $500 billion through 2024, while Representative Paul Ryan’s plan would slash the deficit to $100 billion over the same time period
Deficit and debt Many students need help with the distinction between the deficit and
the debt (and with what happens to the debt when there is a surplus) Use the student loan
or credit card analogy Explain that the budget balance (the deficit or surplus) is just like a personal budget balance (the amount that a student borrows or pays back during a given year) The debt—the total amount owed by the government—is like the balance on a
Trang 3student loan or credit card account Students (usually) have a budget deficit and
increasing debt And graduates with a job (usually) have a budget surplus and decreasing debt
An interesting historical episode During the mid-1830s—a long time ago—the U.S
government had virtually repaid all its debt At that time the government faced a problem that doesn’t occur today: it had a surplus and didn’t know what to do with it The decision
was made to transfer money to the state governments Each state was to receive $400,000
in four payments of $100,000 each The first three payments were made, but the last one
was postponed because of a recession in 1837 that lowered the federal government’s
revenue and then was never made In the 1970s, faced with a severe budget crunch, the
State of New York sued to receive that last payment plus interest The state lost the suit
and so the last payment probably will never be made! (You might remark that $100,000
invested in 1837 at the average interest rate would have accumulated to about $30 billion
by 2015!)
II Supply-Side Effects of Fiscal Policy
The effects of fiscal policy on employment, potential GDP, and aggregate supply are known
as supply-side effects.
The Effects of Taxes on Full Employment and
Potential GDP
The labor market determines the full
employment quantity of labor, which,
together with the production function,
determine potential GDP
The equilibrium quantity of employment is
determined in the labor market The first
figure shows the labor market In the figure
equilibrium employment is 250 billion hours
per year This amount of employment is
full-employment
The second figure shows the production
function With employment of 250 billion
hours, the production function shows that
real GDP is $13 trillion
An income tax decreases the supply of labor and shifts the supply of labor curve
leftward In the top figure, the LS curve shifts leftward Because of the tax wedge, the level of employment decreases In the bottom figure the decrease in employment
decreases potential GDP
An income tax drives a tax wedge
between the before-tax wage rate that firms
pay and the after-tax wage rate that
workers receive Other taxes, such as sales
taxes, add to the tax wedge by effectively
lowering the real wage rate
Some Real World Tax Wedges … Does the Tax
Wedge Matter?
Tax wedges vary across countries, being much
higher in France than in the United States
According to supply-side economists such as Ed
Prescott, the tax wedge has a large impact on
Trang 4potential GDP Potential GDP per person in France is 30 percent below that in the United States and Prescott asserts that the entire difference can be attributed to the difference in the countries’ tax wedges
Trang 5Taxes and the Incentive to Save and Invest
A tax on interest income decreases the
supply of saving and shifts the supply of
loanable funds curve leftward The tax
drives a wedge between the after-tax
interest rate received by savers and the
interest rate paid by firms The tax does not
change the demand for loanable funds
The figure shows the result: the real
interest rate paid by borrowers rises (from
5 percent to 6 percent in the figure) and
the equilibrium quantity of loanable funds
and investment decrease
The decrease in investment lowers the
growth rate of potential GDP
Tax Revenues and the Laffer Curve
The relationship between the tax rate and the amount of tax collected is called the
Laffer curve The Laffer curve shows that at a high enough tax rate, an increase in
tax rates decreases tax revenues Tax revenues decrease because individuals find
ways to avoid the high taxes, including by working less
Most economists believe that taxes have an effect on the supply of labor, but that in the U.S economy, the tax rate is low enough so that an increase in the tax rate
increases tax revenues
Laffer Curve and Napkins: Students get a kick out of the napkin roots of the Laffer
Curve The story that Laffer himself cannot deny nor confirm is that he first drew the Laffer curve on a napkin during one of his first attempts to persuade someone of his supply side
theory Draw the Laffer curve and ask what side of the curve are we on? Ask them what
they think the highest tax rate was in the United States, they are usually shocked to learn
that we had marginal rates in the 70% range as recently as the 1970 This a great
discussion point on how high tax rates can deter work!
Consumption Tax: Students enjoy exploring the controversial idea of abolishing the IRS in
favor of a consumption tax Whether you agree with it or not, the Fairtax plan (Google
Fairtax plan to find the website) covers many issues from this chapter and is an awesome
way to bring together many of the topics from the course Students engage with the
concept of a revenue neutral switch from our mixed tax system to 100% consumption tax I assign a short paper for them to investigate one of the many sub-topics within the plan
The Economics in the News detail compares the U.S corporate tax rate with those in other countries and explores how the tax wedge affects the U.S loanable funds market
III Generational Effects of Fiscal Policy
Generational accounting is an accounting system that measures the lifetime tax burden
and benefits of government programs to each generation
Generational Accounting and Present Value
To compare the costs and benefits that occur at different points in the future, which is
necessary in generational accounting, the concept of present value is used A present value
is an amount of money that, if invested today, will grow to equal a given future amount
when the interest that it earns is taken into account Because there is uncertainty about the
Trang 6proper interest rate to use when calculating present values, plausible alternative numbers are used to estimate a range of present values
The Social Security Time Bomb
Fiscal imbalance is the present value of the government’s commitments to pay
benefits minus the present value of its tax revenues In 2014, the fiscal imbalance was estimated to be $68 trillion and growing by about $2 trillion every year The fiscal imbalance is high because of obligations under Social Security laws and Medicare
There are four alternatives for redressing the fiscal imbalance: raise income taxes, raise Social Security taxes, cut Social Security benefits, or cut federal government discretionary spending But the changes needed would be severe It is estimated that income taxes would need to be raised by 69 percent; or Social Security taxes raised by 95 percent; or Social Security benefits cut by 56 percent
Generational Imbalance
Generational imbalance is the division of the fiscal imbalance between the current and
future generations assuming that the current generation will enjoy the current levels of taxes and benefits It is estimated that the current generation will pay 83 percent of the fiscal imbalance and the future generations will pay 17 percent
IV Fiscal Stimulus
A fiscal action that is initiated by an act of Congress is called discretionary fiscal policy.
A fiscal action that is triggered by the state of the economy is called automatic fiscal policy.
Automatic Fiscal Policy and Cyclical and Structural Budget Balances
Tax revenues and needs-tested spending change with the business cycle
The government sets tax rates As incomes vary with the business cycle, the tax revenue collected changes Tax revenue automatically falls in recessions and automatically rises in expansions
Government expenditure on programs that pay benefits to people and
businesses depending on their economic status is called needs-tested
spending Needs-tested spending automatically increases in a recession and
automatically decreases in an expansion, helping to stabilize the economy
Induced taxes and needs-tested spending mean that the federal budget deficit is counter-cyclical, with the deficit increasing in a recession and decreasing in an expansion
The structural surplus or deficit is the budget balance that would occur if the
economy were at full employment and real GDP were equal to potential GDP The
cyclical surplus or deficit is the actual surplus or deficit minus the structural
surplus or deficit
In 2014 the total U.S budget deficit was $0.64 trillion According to the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) the cyclical deficit was $0.18 trillion so the structural deficit was $0.46 trillion
The structural deficit skyrocketed after 2008
By their nature, automatic fiscal policy implies federal budget deficits in recessions as tax revenues fall and spending increases By contrast, balanced budget rules for state and local governments mean that these governments do not conduct stabilizing fiscal policy In the 2008 recession, the sharp decline in state and local tax revenues meant that state spending programs had to be cut and, in some states, taxes raised Such policies are the opposite of the policies that can be used to help stabilize the business cycle
Trang 7 Automatic fiscal policy helps stabilize the business cycle because it provides an
automatic stimulus during a recession and an automatic contraction during an
expansion
Discretionary Fiscal Stimulus
The government expenditure multiplier is the quantitative effect of a change in
government expenditure on real GDP An increase in government expenditure
increases aggregate expenditures setting in motion the multiplier process
The tax multiplier is the quantitative effect of a change in taxes on real GDP A
decrease in taxes increases disposable income and hence consumption expenditure, setting in motion the multiplier process
The effect on aggregate demand from a tax cut is less than that from a similar
sized increase in government expenditure A $1 tax cut generates less than a $1
increase in consumption expenditure since only a fraction (equal to the MPC) of
the $1 increase in disposable income is spent on consumption expenditure
Trang 8Fiscal Stimulus
Expansionary fiscal policy (an increase in
government expenditure or a decrease in
taxes) seeks to eliminate a recessionary
gap If timed correctly and of the correct
magnitude, fiscal policy can be used to
push the economy to potential GDP
The figure shows the effect of expansionary
fiscal policy on aggregate demand At the
initial equilibrium, $15 trillion real GDP and
price level of 110, there is a recessionary
gap The expansionary policy increases
aggregate demand and the multiplied
effect shifts the AD curve rightward from
AD0 to AD1 The recessionary gap is
eliminated and the economy moves to its
new equilibrium, $16 trillion real GDP
(which equals potential GDP) and price level of 115
Fiscal Stimulus and Aggregate Supply
The focus so far has been on only aggregate demand But fiscal policy also impacts
aggregate supply
Government Expenditure: An increase in government expenditure increases the budget deficit The demand for loanable funds increases, so the real interest rate rises and investment is crowded out The decrease in investment offsets the
expansionary effect from the increase in government expenditure The crowding-out effect is strong enough so that the government expenditure is less than 1
Tax Cut: A tax cut also has effects on aggregate supply A tax cut increases the supply of labor and the supply of loanable funds, both of which increase aggregate supply The supply-side effects make the tax multiplier larger than the government expenditure multiplier
There is quite a bit of controversy about the size of the multipliers and this controversy is nicely covered in an Economics in Action detail Christina Romer, while working for the Obama administration, asserted that the government expenditure multiplier was 1.5 Robert Barro, of Harvard University, says his research shows the multiplier is 0.5 These differences are dramatic and students can appreciate their importance and real-world relevance Highlight the Ricardo-Barro effect as a possible argument for smaller
multipliers
Limitations of Discretionary Fiscal Policy
In practice, discretionary fiscal policy is hampered by three time lags:
Recognition Lag: The recognition lag is the time it takes to figure out that fiscal policy actions are needed
Law-Making Lag: The law-making lag is the amount of time it takes Congress to pass the laws needed to change taxes or spending
Impact Lag: The impact lag is the time it takes from passing a tax or spending
change to implementing the new arrangements and feeling their effects on real GDP
Fiscal policy in practice Most economists acknowledge that, in principle, discretionary
fiscal policy can be used for stabilization purposes, but in practice such stabilization is extremely difficult because of long legislative lags It is worth reminding the students that
the equilibrium in the AS-AD model takes time to work out The multiplier is a long drawn
Trang 9out process An increase in government expenditure shifts the AD curve rightward but the
new equilibrium price level and real GDP take time to occur It is also useful to discuss the
length of time it took the Congress to pass the 2002 “stimulus package” and the time it
took in the Fall of 2008 to decide on a fiscal policy to be used after the initial “bailout
package.” The law-making lag can be substantial and the outcomes questionable!
Trang 10A d d i t i o n a l P r o b l e m s
1 The government is proposing to lower the tax rate on labor income and asks you to report on the supply-side effects of such an action Answer the
following questions and describe what happens on the relevant graph You are being asked about directions of change, not exact magnitudes
a What will happen to the supply of labor and why?
b What will happen to the demand for labor and why?
c What will happen to the equilibrium level of employment and why?
d What will happen to the equilibrium before-tax wage rate?
e What will happen to the equilibrium after-tax wage rate?
f What will happen to potential GDP?
2 How Reagan Would Fix the Economy
Many Republicans look at Reagan’s policies in the early 1980s and assert that tax cuts pay for themselves That’s wrong—Reagan’s rate cuts for the rich paid for themselves, but the tax cuts for the poor, the middle class and
corporations did not The deficit increased But there is a limit to the deficit
At some time the government debt grows so large that it starts to harm the economy through higher interest rates, bigger debt payments, a weaker currency, etc
Time, May 26, 2008
a Explain why Reagan’s tax rate cuts for high income taxpayers may have paid for themselves, but cuts for lower-income and middle-income taxpayers did not
b Explain the negative consequences of running persistently large budget deficits
3 Explain why extending unemployment insurance benefits has both a supply-side and demand-supply-side effect on real GDP and the price level
S o l u t i o n s t o A d d i t i o n a l P r o b l e m s
1 a The supply of labor increases The supply of labor curve shifts rightward The supply
of labor increases because at each real wage rate, the after-tax wage rate received
by workers will be higher given a decrease in the tax rate on labor income
b The demand for labor remains the same The demand for labor depends on the productivity of labor, which remains the same following the decrease in the tax rate
on labor income
c The equilibrium level of employment increases With the rightward shift in the supply
of labor curve, the real wage rate decreases and the quantity of labor demanded increases along the demand for labor curve Equilibrium employment increases
d The equilibrium pre-tax wage rate decreases The rightward shift of the supply of labor curve leads to movement down along the demand for labor curve
e The equilibrium after-tax wage rate increases The decrease in the tax rate on labor income decreases the wedge between the before-tax wage rate and the after-tax wage rate The before-tax wage rate decreases but not by as much as the decrease
in tax So the after-tax wage rate increases