Trend percentages represent the expression of several years’ financial data in percentage form in terms of a base year... Expenses including the cost of goods sold have been increasing a
Trang 1CHAPTER 4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS - I
I Questions
1 The objective of financial statements analysis is to determine the extent
of a firm’s success in attaining its financial goals, namely:
a To earn maximum profit
b To maintain solvency
c To attain stability
2 Some of the indications of satisfactory short-term solvency or working capital position of a business firm are:
1 Favorable credit position
2 Satisfactory proportion of cash to the requirements of the current volume
3 Ability to pay current debts in the regular course of business
4 Ability to extend more credit to customers
5 Ability to replenish inventory promptly
3 These tests are:
1 Improvement in the financial position
2 Well-balanced financial structure between borrowed funds and equity
3 Effective employment of borrowed funds and equity
4 Ability to declare satisfactory amount of dividends to shareholders
5 Ability to withstand adverse business conditions
6 Ability to engage in research and development in an attempt to provide new products or improve old products, methods or processes
4 Some indicators of managerial efficiency are:
Trang 21 Ability to earn a reasonable return on its investment of borrowed funds and equity
2 Ability to control operating costs within reasonable limits
3 No overinvestment in fixed assets, receivables and inventories
5 The techniques used in Financial Statement Analysis are:
I Vertical analysis which shows the relationships of the items in the same year: also referred to as “static measure.”
a Financial ratios
b Common-size statements
II Horizontal analysis which shows the changes or tendencies of
an item for 2 or more years; also referred to as “dynamic measure.”
a Comparative statements - showing changes in absolute amount and percentages
b Trend percentages III Use of special reports or statements
a Statements of Changes in Financial Position
b Gross Profit / Net Income Variation Analysis
6 Refer to page 133 of the textbook
7 Horizontal analysis involves the comparison of items on financial statements between years Analysis of comparative financial statements or the increase/decrease method of analysis and trend percentages are the two techniques that may be applied under horizontal analysis
Vertical analysis involves the study of items on a single statement for a single year, such as the analysis of an income statement for some given year Common-size statement and financial ratios are techniques used
in vertical analysis
8 Trends can indicate whether a situation is improving, remaining the same or deteriorating They can also give insight to the probable future course of events in a firm
9 Trend percentages represent the expression of several years’ financial data in percentage form in terms of a base year
Trang 310 Refer to page 133 of the textbook.
11 Observation of trends is useful primarily in determining whether a situation is improving, worsening, or remaining constant By comparing current data with similar data of prior periods we gain insight into the direction in which future results are likely to move Some other standards of comparison include comparison with other similar companies, comparison with industry standards, and comparison with previous years’ information By comparing analytical data for one company with some independent yardstick, the analyst hopes to determine how the position of the company in question compares with some standard of performance
12 Trend percentages are used to show the increase or decrease in a
financial statement amount over a period of years by comparing the
amount in each year with the base-year amount A component
percentage is the percentage relationship between some financial amount and a total of which it is a part
Measuring the change in sales over a period of several years would call for use of trend percentages The sales in the base year are assigned a weight of 100% The percentage for each later year is computed by dividing that year’s sales by the sales in the base year
13 Expenses (including the cost of goods sold) have been increasing at an even faster rate than net sales Thus Premiere is apparently having difficulty in effectively controlling its expenses
14 A corporate net income of P1 million would be unreasonably low for a large corporation, with, say, P100 million in sales, P50 million in assets, and P40 million in equity A return of only P1 million for a company of this size would suggest that the owners could do much better by investing in insured bank savings accounts or in government bonds which would be virtually risk-free and would pay a higher return
On the other hand, a profit of P1 million would be unreasonably high for a corporation which had sales of only P5 million, assets of, say, P3 million, and equity of perhaps one-half million pesos In other words, the net income of a corporation must be judged in relation to the scale
of operations and the amount invested
Trang 4II True or False
III Problems
Problem 1 (Percentage Changes)
a Accounts receivable decreased 16% (P24,000 decrease P150,000 = 16% decrease)
b Marketable securities decreased 100% (P250,000 decrease P250,000
= 100% decrease)
c A percentage change cannot be calculated because retained earnings showed a negative amount (a deficit) in the base year and a positive amount in the following year
d A percentage change cannot be calculated because of the zero amount
of notes receivable in 2005, the base year
e Notes payable increased 7 ½% (P60,000 increase P800,000 = 7 ½% increase)
f Cash increased 3% (P2,400 increase P80,000 = 3% increase)
g Sales increased 10% (P90,000 increase P900,000 = 10% increase)
Problem 2 (Computing and Interpreting Rates of Change)
Requirement (a)
Computation of percentage changes:
1 Net sales increased 10% (P200,000 increase P2,000,000 = 10% increase)
2 Total expenses increased 11% (P198,000 increase P1,800,000 = 11% increase)
Requirement (b)
1 Total expenses grew faster than net sales Net income cannot also have
grown faster than net sales, or the sum of the parts would exceed the size of the whole
2 Net income must represent a smaller percentage of net sales in 2006 than it did in 2005 Again, the reason is that the expenses have grown
at a faster rate than net sales Thus, total expenses represent a larger
Trang 5percentage of total sales in 2006 than in 2005, and net income must represent a smaller percentage
Problem 3 (Financial Statement Analysis using Comparative Statements or Increase-Decrease Method)
Requirement 1
XYZ Corporation
Balance Sheet
As of December 31
Change
Assets
Cash and equivalents 14,000 16,000 2,000 14.29%
Prepayments and others 4,800 7,400 2,600 54.17% Total current assets 101,600 164,600 63,000 62.01% Property, plant & equipment - net
of dep 30,200 73,400 43,200 143.05%
Liabilities and Equity
Notes payable to banks 10,000 54,000 44,000 440.00% Accounts payable 31,600 55,400 23,800 73.32%
Accrued liabilities 4,200 6,800 2,600 61.90% Income taxes payable 5,800 7,000 1,200 20.69%
Total current liabilities 51,600 123,200 71,600 138.76%
Retained earnings 35,600 70,200 34,600 97.19%
Total equity 80,200 114,800 34,600 43.14% Total liabilities and equity 131,800 238,000 106,200 80.58% XYZ Corporation
Income Statement
Years ended December 31
(P thousands)
Change
Cost of goods sold 191,400 314,600 123,200 64.37% Gross profit 75,000 109,400 34,400 45.87%
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 35,500 58,400 22,900 64.51%
Trang 6Income before income taxes 39,500 51,000 11,500 29.11% Income taxes 12,300 16,400 4,100 33.33% Net income 27,200 34,600 7,400 27.21%
Requirement 2
Short-term financial position
1 Current
Assets increased by 62.01% while Current Liabilities increased by 138.76%
Unfavorable
2 Quick
Assets increased by 62.40% while Current Liabilities increased by 138.76%
Unfavorable
3 Net
Sales increased by 59.16% while Accounts Receivable increased by 93.06%
Unfavorable
4 Cost of
Goods Sold increased by 64.37% while
Inventorie
s increased by 58.52%
Favorable
Leverage
5 Total
Assets increased by 80.58% while Total Liabilities increased by 138.76%
Unfavorable
6 Total
Liabilities increased by 138.76% while TotalEquity increased by 43.14%
Unfavorable
Profitability
7 Net
Sales increased by 59.16% while Cost of Goods Sold increased by 64.37%
Unfavorable
8 Net
Sales increased by 59.16% while
Selling, General &
Administrativ
e Expenses
increased by 64.51%
Unfavorable
9 Net
Sales increased by 59.16% while Net Income increased by 27.21%
Unfavorable
10 Net
Income increased by 27.21% while
Total Assets increased by 80.58%
Unfavorable
Problem 4 (Trend Percentages)
Trang 7Requirement (1)
The trend percentages are:
Year 5 Year 4 Year 3 Year 2 Year 1
Requirement (2)
Sales: The sales are increasing at a steady rate, with a particularly
strong gain in Year 4
Assets: Cash declined from Year 3 through Year 5 This may have
been due to the growth in both inventories and accounts receivable In particular, the accounts receivable grew far faster than sales in Year 5 The decline in cash may reflect delays in collecting receivables This is a matter for management to investigate further
Liabilities: The current liabilities jumped up in Year 5 This was
probably due to the buildup in accounts receivable in that the company doesn’t have the cash needed to pay bills as they come due
Problem 5 (Use of Trend Percentages)
a 1 An unfavorable tendency could be observed in Receivables in
relation to Net Sales from 2003 – 2005 because receivables had been increasing at a much faster rate than Net Sales This could indicate inefficiency in the collection of receivables or simply poor company credit policy The situation however, improved in 2006 and 2007 when sales started to move up at a faster rate than accounts receivable This would indicate improvement in the credit and collection policy or more cash sales were being generated
Trang 82 Unfavorable tendency in inventory persisted from 2003 to 2007 because it had been going up at a much faster rate than Net Sales
If this continues, the company will end up with over-investment in inventory because the buying rate is faster than the selling price
3 Favorable tendencies could be noted in Fixed Assets in relation to Net Sales because inspite of the minimal additions to fixed assets made by the company from 2003 through 2007, sales had been increasing at a very encouraging rate
4 Net Income had likewise been increasing at a much faster rate than net sales This is favorable because this would indicate that the company had been successfully controlling the increases in Cost of Sales and Operating Expenses
b Review computations of the Trend Percentages It will be noted that the Trend Percentages in Total Noncurrent Liabilities and Equity from
2005 to 2007 were interchanged Correction should be made first before interpretation is done
1 The upward tendency in current assets had been accompanied by an upward trend in current liabilities It could be noted that current assets had been moving up at a much faster rate than current liabilities This is favorable because the margin of safety of the short-term creditors is widened
2 Favorable tendencies could also be observed in noncurrent assets which had been increasing and which increases had been accompanied by downward trend in noncurrent liabilities This would mean better security on the part of creditors and stronger financial position
3 There is an unfavorable tendency in Net Sales in relation to non-current assets Sales had not been increasing at the same rate as the increases in fixed assets This could indicate that more investments are made in noncurrent assets without considering whether or not they could sell the additional units of product they are producing
c The unfavorable trend in net income could be attributed to the following tendencies:
1 Higher rates of increases in cost of sales as compared to sales
2 Higher rates of increases in selling, general and administrative expenses in relation to net sales
3 Higher rates of increases in other financial expenses than the rates
of increases in net sales
Trang 9IV Multiple Choice Questions
4 B
5 D
6 C
7 C
8 A
9 D
10 C
* (P400,000 – P160,000) P160,000 = 150%