dynamic business law essentials 3e 2016 chapter 05

The Supremacy Clause Article VI of the United States Constitution •Provides that federal law is the “supreme law” of the United States •Any state or local law that directly conflicts wi

Chapter 5

Constitutional Law

Chapter 5 Case Hypothetical

The annual Smallville Fair is the community event of the year Attendance is always high, with community members going to enjoy the thrill rides, the exhibits, and the food, as well as to “see and be seen.” Principal Cuthbert of Smallville High School is there, and as he turns the corner (around the “Guess Your Age or Weight” exhibit,) he is shocked by what he sees In front of the “Bearded Lady” exhibit is the star Smallville High School quarterback, senior Coy Gunner Gunner is wearing a green “tee-shirt” depicting a Christ-like figure smoking a marijuana cigarette; in large yellow letters on the front of the shirt are the words “Joints For Jesus.” On the back of the shirt (again, in large yellow letters) is the following: “WWJS: What Would Jesus

at 7:30 a.m.”

Gunner arrives at Principal Cuthbert’s office on Monday morning to discover that Principle Cuthbert has decided to suspend him for ten school days Gunner objects, saying “I remember in civics class that Mr Campbell told us we have the right to free speech I object to the suspension, and if you don’t change your

mind, Principle Cuthbert, my dad knows a good attorney who might want to speak with you.”

Is the message on Gunner’s shirt constitutionally-protected free speech? Would rational limitations on free speech justify Principle Cuthbert’s decision to suspend Gunner? Does it matter whether the incident occurred

on or off school property?

Chapter 5 Case Hypothetical

Prosecutor Alicia Jones was cautiously optimistic that victory was hers She had just tried the defendant Donovan Howell, Jr for first-degree murder of Donovan Howell, Sr., a wealthy construction company owner from Charleston, South Carolina Any prosecutor would have been pleased with the evidence Prosecutor Jones had introduced to the Charleston County jury Although there was no eyewitness to the elder Howell’s murder, there was an abundance of circumstantial evidence, including three (3) witnesses who had observed the younger Howell board the yacht of his father at 1:00 a.m on Sunday, June 27 (Donovan Howell, Sr.’s body was found on board his yacht later that same morning), a knife next to the elder Howell’s body with his son’s fingerprints on it, and Donovan Howell, Jr.’s confession to Charleston County police on Friday, July 2 In light of all of the circumstantial evidence against his client, defense attorney Edward York had taken the risk of putting his client on the witness stand The young Howell responded reasonably well to both direct examination and to Prosecutor Jones’ cross-examination

After five (5) full days of deliberation, the jury announced to the court that it was hopelessly deadlocked, and could not reach a verdict After inquiring whether there was any possibility that further jury deliberation would resolve the impasse, and after the foreperson’s response of “Most definitely not, your honor,” Judge Gregory Williams officially declared a mistrial Prosecutor Jones knew there was no way to predict what a jury would do, and she had tried to condition herself with this reality of trial practice, but she was nevertheless shocked by this jury’s inability to reach a verdict in light of all of the evidence she believed

proved Donovan Howell, Jr.’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt

After Judge Williams’ declaration of mistrial, Prosecutor Jones immediately polled the jury She discovered that ten (10) jurors were in favor of the defendant’s conviction, with the remaining two (2) jurors opposed to conviction Those two (2) jurors, Amanda Yates and Carla Yoder, explained why they voted against conviction Ms Yates, a twenty-eight year-old unmarried waitress with a three-year-old son, explained to Prosecutor Jones that there was no way Donovan Howell, Jr could have committed murder Said Ms Yates, “He just seems like such a polite and well-mannered young man…There is just no way he killed his father.” Ms Yoder, a sixty-eight-year-old retiree, had different reasons for her belief that defendant Howell was innocent Ms Yoder stated “Just because he was on his father’s boat doesn’t mean he killed his father I believe the young man

was framed I believe the knife was planted on the boat, and I believe the police coerced his confession.”

The United States Constitution

•Establishes a “federalist” system of government (with authority divided between the federal and state

governments)

•Allocates power among the three federal branches of government (legislative,

executive, and judicial)

•Establishes a system of “checks and balances”

Figure 5-1: The System of Checks and Balances

Legislative Branch (U.S Congress)

• Can refuse to ratify treaties

• Can impeach and remove

president

On Judicial Branch:

• Can pass amendments to overrule judicial rulings

• Can impeach judges

• Establishes lower courts and sets number of judges

Figure 5-1: The System of Checks and Balances

Executive Branch (U.S President)

• Appoints federal judges

• Can pardon federal offenders

Figure 5-1: The System of Checks and Balances Judicial Branch (U.S Federal Court System)

The Supremacy Clause (Article VI of

the United States Constitution)

•Provides that federal law is the

“supreme law” of the United States

•Any state or local law that directly conflicts with federal law is void

The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section

8 of the United States Constitution)

•The primary source of authority for federal regulation of business

•States that the U.S Congress has the power

to “regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States…”

•Simultaneously empowers the federal government and restricts the power of state governments

Taxing and Spending Powers of the Federal

Government (Article I, Section 8 of the United

•Regulatory impact of tax does not affect its constitutionality

Other Constitutional Restrictions on

Government

•Privileges and Immunities Clause

•Full Faith and Credit Clause

•Contract Clause

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of

Rights: The First Amendment

•Protects freedom of religion, press, speech, and peaceable assembly

•Ensures that citizens have the right to ask the government to redress

grievances

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Second Amendment

Finds that in light of the need for a

well-regulated militia for security, government cannot infringe on citizens’

right to bear arms

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Third Amendment

Provides that government cannot house soldiers in private residences during peacetime, or during war, except for provisions in the law

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Fourth Amendment

•Protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure

•Ensures that government issues warrants only with “probable cause”

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Fifth Amendment

•Ensures that government does not put citizens

on trial except upon indictment by a grand jury

•Gives citizens the right not to testify against themselves (privilege against self-incrimination)

•Prevents government from trying citizens twice for the same crime (double jeopardy)

•Creates the right to due process

•Provides that government cannot take private property for public use without just compensation

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Sixth Amendment

•Provides the right to a speedy public trial with an impartial jury

•Provides the right to know what criminal accusations a citizen faces

•Provides the right to have witnesses both against and for the accused

•Provides the right to an attorney

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Seventh Amendment

States that in common law suits where the monetary value exceeds $20, citizens have the right to a jury trial

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Eighth Amendment

•Provides that government will not set excessive bail

•Prohibits government imposition of excessive fines

•Prohibits cruel and unusual punishment

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Ninth Amendment

Provides that although the Bill of Rights names certain rights, such naming does not remove other rights retained by

citizens

Exhibit 5-1: Summary of the Bill of Rights: The Tenth Amendment

Provides that powers that the U.S

Constitution does not give to the federal government are reserved to the

states

Speech Not Protected By The First

Amendment

•Defamation

•Obscenity

•Fighting Words

U.S Supreme Court Standard of Obscenity

Established In Miller v California

•Would the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find that the speech appeals to the prurient interest?

•Does the speech depict/describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way?

•Does the speech lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?

First Amendment Provisions Protecting

Citizens’ Freedom Of Religion

•The Establishment Clause

- Provides that government “shall make

no law respecting an establishment of religion”

•The Free Exercise Clause

- States that government cannot make

a law “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion

U.S Supreme Court Tests For Determining Whether A

Particular Government Statute Violates The Establishment Clause (As Set Forth In Lemon v

The Fifth Amendment Due Process

Clause

States that government cannot deprive a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law

Types Of Due Process Guaranteed By The Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause

•Procedural Due Process—Requires government to use fair procedures when taking life, liberty, or property

•Substantive Due Process—Ensures basic fairness of laws that may deprive life, liberty,

or property

The Fifth Amendment Takings

Clause

Definition: Constitutional guarantee providing that when government takes private property for public use, it must pay the owner just compensation, or fair market value, for his/her property

The Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (the “Equal Protection”

“similarly-Judicial Tests to Determine Violations of the

Fourteenth Amendment

•“Strict Scrutiny” Test: Applies to “suspect classifications” based on race, national origin, and/or citizenship that would prevent individuals from

exercising a fundamental right (such classification allowed only if necessary to promote a “compelling state interest”)

•“Intermediate Scrutiny” Test: Applies to classifications based on gender or on the legitimacy of children (such classification allowed only if it is substantially related to

an “important government objective”)

•“Rational Basis” Test: Applies to all other matters (such classification allowed only if it advances a

“legitimate government interest”)