Chapter 8 Hypothetical Case 1• Bob Swaby, owner of Fire and Ice Heatng and Air Conditoning, and Ben Christanson, owner of Thermostat Dreams HVAC, are bitter compettors.. One night he cal
Trang 1Chapter 8
Tort Law
Copyright © 2017 Hill Education All rights reserved No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
Trang 2• LO8-1: How do we classify torts?
• LO8-2: What are some of the most common
intentonal torts and the elements needed to
prove them?
• LO8-3: What types of damages are available in
tort cases?
8-2
Trang 3Chapter 8 Hypothetical Case 1
• Bob Swaby, owner of Fire and Ice Heatng and Air Conditoning, and Ben Christanson, owner of
Thermostat Dreams HVAC, are bitter compettors Both are determined to meet the heatng and
cooling needs of the small town of Valdese, North Carolina For years, each business owner has
sought to outdo the other through price undercutting and other business practces, and tensions
between the two have grown
Christanson's wife and children go on vacaton to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina while he stays
behind During this tme, Swaby concocts a devious scheme One night he calls Christanson,
disguising his voice and identfying himself as the head administrator at the Horry County, South
Carolina Coroner's Office Swaby tells Christanson that his family has been murdered, and that he
must come to South Carolina to identfy the bodies and partcipate in the investgaton of their
deaths Shocked and distraught, Christanson drives the six hours to Horry County, South Carolina
There, Christanson discovers he has been the victm of a very twisted joke
When he returns home, Christanson does not feel quite right He has trouble sleeping, has
difficulty concentratng on his job, experiences bouts of anxiety, and often feels despondent He
consults a psychiatrist, who diagnoses Christanson with a form of post-traumatc stress disorder
• Assuming Christanson discovers that Swaby is the perpetrator of the prank, does Christanson
have an actonable civil claim against Swaby? If so, on what legal theory should the acton be
based, and what is the appropriate amount of monetary damages?
8-3
Trang 4Chapter 8 Hypothetical Case 2
• When Sylvia Wood talks, people listen As a talk-show host with her own natonally syndicated
television program, "The Sylvia Show," Wood reaches approximately thirty million viewers each
week Her dedicated viewers are collectvely referred to as "Sylvia's Milita," and most wait
breathlessly for Wood's on-air blessings of products, people, and books
One of her recent programs has Wood in hot water Wood devoted her September 30 episode to a
food-borne illness commonly referred to as "crazy chicken" disease During the past two years,
approximately fifty people in the United States have developed physical symptoms after eatng
undercooked, diseased chicken Apparently, chickens have developed the disease after eatng
substandard feed, and consumers have been affected down the food chain Common symptoms
include muscle contractons, nausea, and diarrhea
During the September 30 episode of "The Sylvia Show," Wood interviewed a medical doctor, Dr
Tyson Fowler, who said that in his opinion, chicken was not safe for human consumpton In
response, Wood had said "Dr Fowler, if that is the case, I will never eat chicken again."
Hearing of this episode, the United Poultry Growers Associaton sued Wood and "The Sylvia Show,"
claiming commercial disparagement (the commercial equivalent of defamaton.)
• Are the defendants Wood and "The Sylvia Show" liable for commercial disparagement? 8-4
Trang 5• A wrong or injury to another, other than a
breach of contract
8-5
Trang 6Purposes of Tort Law
• Compensate innocent injured persons
• Prevent private retaliaton by injured
partes
• Reinforce vision of a just society
• Deter future wrongs
8-6
Trang 7Classification of Torts
• Intentonal torts: Occur when defendant takes
acton intending certain consequences or
knowing they are likely to result
• Negligent torts: Occur when defendant acts in a
way that subjects other people to unreasonable
risk of harm
• Strict liability torts: Occur when defendant takes
acton that is inherently dangerous and cannot
ever be undertaken safely.
8-7
Trang 8Common Intentional Torts
Against Persons
• Assault
• Battery
• Defamaton (published, libel; spoken, slander)
• Invasion of privacy (false light, public disclosure
of private facts, appropriaton for commercial
gain, and intrusion on an individual's affairs or
seclusion)
• False imprisonment
• Intentonal inflicton of emotonal distress
Trang 9Common Intentional Torts
Against Property
• Trespass to realty
• Private nuisance
• Trespass to personal property
• Conversion
8-9
Trang 10Common Intentional Torts
Against Economic Interests
• Disparagement
• Intentonal interference with contract
• Unfair competton
• Misappropriaton
• Fraudulent misrepresentaton
8-10
Trang 11Damages Available in Tort Cases
plaintff whole (puts plaintff in same positon
he/she would have been in had tort not
occurred)
signifies defendant's behavior was wrongful,
but caused no harm
defendant and seek to deter such conduct in
Trang 12Chapter 8 Hypothetical Case 3
• Officers Jones and Henderson are well-respected police officers in the town of Woodlawn
They have been recognized, both within the police department and by the community, for
their outstanding service While on patrol in downtown Woodlawn late one evening, they
observe a person sleeping on a park bench in the town square The person is Fred Ames, a
homeless man known in the community for his trouble with alcohol and illicit substances
Ames has a long history of bad choices and bad luck, and most in Woodlawn know him
well Woodlawn does not have a law against vagrancy or homelessness.
Determined to clean up the downtown area, the officers demand that Ames get in the
back of the squad car Reluctantly, and without the use of force on the part of Jones or
Henderson, Ames complies Officers Jones and Henderson transport Ames to a rural area,
where they release him on a dark country road and warn him not to return to Woodlawn
untl he "cleans up his act once and for all."
• Have Jones and Henderson committed a tort against Ames? Are the officers within the
privilege of their authority in removing Ames from the downtown area? Did the officers
act unethically? Should Woodlawn implement a law against vagrancy/homelessness?
8-12
Trang 13Chapter 8 Hypothetical Case 4
colleagues decided to throw a party in her honor Farrow had long been the person
in her office who was the first to celebrate and acknowledge her colleagues'
birthdays, anniversaries, engagements, and new babies, so they wanted to make
the party a surprise—a party that, for once, she didn't have to plan.
All the planning went off without a hitch, and Farrow didn't suspect a thing When
she was called into the office on a Saturday afternoon unexpectedly, she became
worried that something was very wrong As she opened the door, her colleagues
jumped out and yelled, "Surprise!" Just like that, Farrow dropped dead of a heart
attack.
individuals who planned the party Is this situaton an intentonal tort? Why or why
not?
8-13