Step 1 Equivalent Units Physical Direct Conversion Application of costs Step 5: To units completed and transferred to To units not completed and still in process, Feb... Step 2 Step
Trang 1CHAPTER 14 COVERAGE OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
FUNDA- MENTAL ASSIGN- MENT MATERIAL
CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISES AND
EXERCISES PROBLEMS
CASES, NIKE 10K, EXCEL, COLLAB & INTERNET EXERCISES LO1: Distinguish between
job-order costing and
process costing
LO2: Prepare summary
journal entries for the
typical transactions of a
job-costing system
LO3: Use an
activity-based-costing system in a
job-order environment
LO4: Show how service
organizations use job
costing
LO5: Explain the basic ideas
underlying process costing
and how they differ from
job costing
LO6: Compute output in
terms of equivalent units
A2,B2 31,32,33,36 44,45,46,47
LO7: Compute costs and
prepare journal entries for
the principal transactions in
inventories affects the
computation of unit costs
under the weighted-average
method
LO9: Use backflush costing
with a JIT production
system
Trang 2JOB-COSTING AND PROCESS-COSTING SYSTEMS 14-A1 (15-20 min.) Answers are in thousands
(80 + 55 + 40 = 175)
Factory department overhead
(180% x 125)
Trang 414-A2 (10-15 min.)
(Step 1) Equivalent Units Physical Direct Conversion
Application of costs (Step 5):
To units completed and transferred to
To units not completed and still in
process, Feb 28, 2,000 units:
Trang 514-A3 (25-30 min.)
(Step 2) (Step 1) _ Equivalent Units _ Physical Direct Conversion Flow of Production Units Materials Costs Work in process, beg inv 10,000 (25%)*
Completed and transferred out
during current period 70,000 70,000 70,000 Work in process, end inv 20,000 (50%)*20,000 10,000 Units accounted for 90,000
Direct Conversion
Work in process, beg inv $ 175,500 $138,000 $ 37,500
(Step 4) Divisor, equivalent units for
Cost per equivalent unit $ 19.40 $ 11.00 $ 8.40
(Step 5) Application of Costs
Completed and transferred
Total work in process $ 304,000
*Degree of completion for conversion costs
Trang 6To recognize actual conversion costs that were
$3,000 greater than the amount applied to the
products
Trang 714-B1 (20-25 min.) Entries are in British pounds (£)
Various accounts, such as cash or
Trang 914-B2 (10-15 min.)
Equivalent Units (Step 1)
Physical Direct Conversion
Work in process, ending inv 300,000 300,000 150,000* Units accounted for 900,000
Total costs to account
To units completed and
transferred to Finishing,
To units not completed and still
in process, end, 300,000 units:
Trang 1014-B3 (25-35 min.)
(Step 2)
Physical Direct Conversion
Work in process, beg inv 550 (40%)*
Completed and transferred
out during current period,
Work in process, end inv 400 (20%)* 400 80
Units accounted for 7,700
Details _
Direct Conversion
Work in process, beg inv $ 5,104 $ 3,190 $ 1,914
Costs added currently 101,064 65,340 35,724
(Step 3) Total costs to account for $106,168 $68,530 $37,638
(Step 4) Divisor, equivalent units
For work done to date ÷ 7,700 ÷ 7,380
Cost per equivalent unit $14.00 $8.90 $5.10
(Step 5) Application of Costs
Total work in process $ 3,968
Total costs accounted for $106,168
*Degree of completion for conversion costs
Trang 11To recognize actual conversion costs that were
$300 less than the amount applied to the products
Trang 1214-1 Three purposes of product costing are to satisfy differing demands for (a) inventory valuation and income determination in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, (b)
income tax reporting, and (c) guiding strategic and operational decision-making
14-2 The distinction between the job cost and the process cost
methods centers largely around how product costing is
accomplished Unlike process costing, which deals with broad averages and great masses of like units, the essential feature of the job-cost method is the attempt to apply costs to specific jobs that may consist of either a single physical unit (a custom sofa) or a few like units (a dozen tables) in a distinct batch or job lot
14-3 The basic record for the accumulation of job costs is the cost sheet or job-cost record Exhibit 14-1 shows a Job-Cost Sheet, and it also shows the related source documents A file of current job-cost sheets becomes the supporting details for the Work-in- Process Inventory account
job-14-4 Source documents include materials requisitions and labor time tickets (time cards)
14-5 Examples of service industries that use the job-costing
approach include repairing, consulting, legal, accounting, painting, dentistry, and income tax preparation
14-6 No, the amount of value-chain activity not captured in either job-cost or process-cost systems is independent of the type of
operating system used
14-7 Examples of process costing include flour, glass, paint, and beer
Trang 1314-8 Examples of process costing include handling of mail, income tax returns, automobile registrations, and drivers license
examinations
14-9 Five key steps in process cost accounting are
the total debits in Work in Process (that is, the costs applied to
Work in Process)
Step 4: Calculate unit costs
Step 5: Apply costs to units completed and to units in
ending work in process
14-10 The first two steps concentrate on what is occurring in
physical or engineering terms The financial impact of the
production process is measured in the final three steps
14-11 (1 x 10,000) + (.5 x 5,000) = 12,500 full-time-equivalent
students
14-12 Beginning inventories + Units started = Units transferred out + Ending inventories
14-13 Transferred-in costs are accounted for operationally the same
as direct materials added at the beginning of a production process They differ from direct material costs because they are a
combination of direct material and conversion costs from a previous department; thus, calling them a direct-material cost is
inappropriate
14-14 When actual conversion costs exceed the amount applied, the excess in the conversion cost account is charged directly to cost of goods sold; the treatment is similar to accounting for underapplied overhead
Trang 1414-15 In addition to inventory valuation and income determination, managers want accurate job costs as guides to pricing and to
allocating effort among particular products, services, or customers They are also necessary in contracts that reimburse the cost of a product or service
14-16 The most important point is that product costing is an
averaging process The unit cost used for inventory purposes is the result of taking some accumulated cost and dividing it by some
measure of production The basic distinction between job order costing and process costing is the breadth of the denominator: in job order costing, it is small (for example, one painting, 100
advertising circulars, or one special packaging machine); but in process costing, it is large (for example, thousands of pounds,
gallons, or board feet)
14-17 No Some service firms trace only direct-labor costs to
individual jobs However, with advances in computer technology and needs for better job-cost information because of competition, more service firms are tracing additional costs to jobs The more costs that are traced to jobs instead of being allocated, the more accurate are the job costs
14-18 The central product costing problem in process costing is how each department should compute the cost of goods transferred out and the cost of goods remaining in the department
14-19 No, but they are especially appropriate for companies with just-in-time systems Any company with small inventories might find backflush costing appealing
14-20 (5 min.)
a and d are service-sector companies
b is merchandising
Trang 15c is manufacturing
14-21 (10-15 min.) You may wish to use T-accounts Amounts are
in millions of dollars You can also use the expression: ending
balance (of any account) equals the beginning balance plus additions less subtractions or EB = BB + A - S In this case “Purchased” is
“additions” and “Used” is “subtractions.”
1 8 + 5 - 7 = 6 (BB + A - S = EB)
2 8 + 9 - 6 = 11 (BB + A - EB = S)
3 5 + Purchases - 7 = 8 Purchases = 10
4 Beginning inventory + 8 - 3 = 7 Beginning inventory = 2
14-22 (10-15 min.) Amounts are in thousands of dollars
Sale of Job A13
Cost of Job A13 sold
Trang 16Var medical supplies Jan 5 $ 925
Direct Labor:
Research associates Jan 5-12 120 hrs $32 $3,840
Research assistants Jan 7-12 180 hrs $19 3,420 7,260
Trang 1714-25 (15 min.) Answers are in thousands of dollars
1 a b c a b c
Construction Finished Cost of Construction Finished Cost of
in Process Houses, Houses in Process Houses, Houses
Job No Sept 30 Sept 30 Sold Sept Oct 31 Oct 31 Sold Oct
To record sale of Job 53
To record cost of Job 53 sold
Trang 1814-26 (30 min.)
The answers (in millions) are $15, $5, and $240
Step-by-step entries are keyed alphabetically The sequence depends on where the student prefers to start You may wish to
raise the question of whether the underapplied overhead should be prorated among the affected accounts at the end of the year
Direct Materials Work in Process
Bal 15 (a) 210 Bal 5 (e) Completed 420 (b) 225 (a) Dir Materials 210
Trang 1914-27 (30 min.)
The answers (in millions) are $25, $22, and $32
Step-by-step entries are keyed alphabetically The sequence depends on where the student prefers to start You may wish to raise the question of whether the underapplied overhead should be prorated among the affected accounts at the end of the year Note the heavy ending Finished Goods
Bal.* 25 (a) 235 Bal.* 22 (e) Completed 493 (b) 275 (a) Dir Materials 235
Trang 2014-29 (5 min.)
Coca-Cola and Nally and Gibson are manufacturing companies U
S Post Office and Mckensey and Co are service companies
14-30 (5 min.)
(1) The debit to the work in process account when
transferring a subcomponent from Process A to the assembly
process is a transferred-in cost
(2) The direct materials used in process A and assembly are variable-cost resources
(3) Direct labor costs in process A and assembly are directly traced fixed- cost resources
(4) An example of an indirect resource cost is the indirect material and indirect labor used for process A and the assembly process
14-31 (5 min.)
The direct material is the limestone rock that is delivered to the plant Because crushing and screening the rock can begin
immediately, we assume that direct material is always 100%
completed Thus, the equivalent units of direct material is the entire
400 tons The 320 tons of rock that have been stocked are 100% complete with respect to both direct labor and overhead
The 80 tons of rock that are in process at the end of March are 40% complete This is 32 equivalent tons (80 tons x 40) Thus, the total work done during March is 400 tons of direct material and 352 (that
is, 320 + 32) equivalent tons of direct labor and overhead
Trang 2114-32 (10-15 min.)
Total costs to account
Application of costs (Step 5):
To units completed and transferred,
Trang 2214-33 (15-20 min.)
Equivalent Units (Step 1)
Costs Materials Costs
Application of costs (Step 5):
To units completed and
Trang 2314-34 (10-15 min.)
Materials added to production in February
Direct labor in February
Factory overhead applied in February
Cost of goods completed and transferred in
February from Assembly to Testing
The Key T-account would show:
Trang 2414-35 (10-15 min.)
Materials added to production
Direct labor
Factory overhead applied
Cost of goods completed and transferred
from Assembly to Finishing
The key T-account would show:
costs to account for 2,295,000
Trang 25
14-36 (10-15 min.)
(Step 2)
Physical Direct Conversion
*Degree of completion: materials, 80%; conversion costs, 40%
**Degree of completion: materials, 20%; conversion costs, 10%
a
.20 x 10,000 and 10 x 10,000
Trang 263 Work in process, Department B 102,200
Work in process, Department A 102,200
14-38 (5-10 min.)
14-39 (10-15 min.)
Dell would most likely use a job-cost system with each order considered a job Because each order is assembled from a set of common parts, there is a single cost for each part Most of the parts are purchased, so the cost is the purchase price If some parts are made, the production cost would be used as the cost of the part
Each order would call for several materials, and each would be added to the order's job-cost sheet Labor would be incurred in assembly, so the direct-labor cost could be allocated to each order based on the number of hours used for assembly If assembly is
highly automated, it is possible that no labor is considered "direct", and labor becomes one more overhead item
Trang 27Overhead costs would be allocated based on one or more cost drivers Possible drivers include direct-labor hours or cost (if direct labor is measured separately), hours in assembly, or number of
component parts For a highly automated process, that latter would
be a likely cost driver
Testing and quality control costs might be part of overhead Alternately, costs of testing final computers could be charged
directly to the order (job) If different types of computers require different amounts of testing, this is a logical allocation method
14-40 (15-25 min.)
1 Ending inventory = Beginning inventory + Purchases - Usage
90 = 70 + Purchases - 468 Purchases = 488
2 Total manufacturing costs = Direct + Direct + Factory
charged to production materials labor overhead
864 = 468 + DL + 8 DL
864 - 468 = 1.8 DL 1.8 DL = 396
DL = 220
3 Cost of goods = Cost of goods available - Beginning finished
= 1,004 - 100
= 904
4 Cost of goods = Cost of goods available - Ending finished
= 1,004 - 120
= 884
Trang 2814-41 (25-35 min.)
The $33,000 amount is given
Trang 29Direct Materials Inventory Work-in-Process Inventory
Trang 30We point out that direct-labor time on a job is usually
compiled for all classes of engineers and then applied at their different compensation rates Overhead is usually not applied
on the piecemeal basis demonstrated here Instead, it is
applied in one step after all the labor costs of the job have been accumulated
Trang 3114-43 (30-40 min.) See details below
using the weighted average process cost method We must look at the equivalent units of conversion work done in May only:
Budget for 284 tons:
$16,000 + ($80 x 284) = $38,720
Budget - Actual = $38,720 - $40,670 = $1,950 unfavorable During May, conversion costs were $1,950 (or 5%) above budget
(Step 2)
*Degree of completion for conversion costs