CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS CHAPTER 8 – INTRODUCTION TO BACTERIAL ABC PROTEINS
Trang 1In Chapter 1 in this volume, E Dassa has
reviewed the classification of ABC proteins,
including prokaryote representatives and their
transport substrates in the many cases where
these have been identified Previous general
reviews have also discussed the ABC proteins
in Escherichia coli (Linton and Higgins, 1998),
Bacillus subtilis (Quentin et al., 1999) and
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Braibant et al., 2000)
and more specifically concerning bacterial
ABC exporters in E coli (Fath and Kolter, 1993;
Young and Holland, 1999) The purpose of
this introductory chapter is therefore briefly to
highlight some of the major characteristics of
bacterial ABC systems and the breadth of their
functions
Prokaryote ABC-dependent transport systems,
whether exporters or importers, all adhere to
the usual formula of a basic four-unit structure,
two membrane components and two units of
ABC-ATPases The membrane components and
the ABCs may be identical or non-identical and
can be fused pairwise in different combinations
as shown in Chapter 1, although unlike those
commonly found in eukaryotes no examples
of all four subunits fused together have been
identified in prokaryotes In describing ABC-dependent transport systems, it is important to emphasize that the term ABC (ATP-binding
cassette, Hyde et al., 1990) is synonymous with
ABC-ATPase, whether present as a subdomain
or an independent polypeptide The term ABC transporter, on the other hand, describes the ABC-ATPase (also called a traffic ATPase; Ames and Lecar, 1992) plus its associated integral membrane domains, whether fused to the ABC
or separately encoded This core transporter or translocation complex may be further supple-mented with essential accessory or auxiliary subunits (usually encoded separately): the external ligand-binding protein in the case of ABC importers, or the MFP (membrane fusion protein) and the OMP-F (outer membrane pro-tein/factor) or OMA (outer membrane auxil-iary) integral to the inner membrane and outer membrane, respectively In the case of ABC transporters, the whole complex may some-times be referred to as the translocon, whilst for the importers, the term permease is also used to describe the entire complex
Whilst ATP is the substrate for the
ABC-ATPase, the molecule or ion being transported
by the ABC transporter is variously described
as a substrate or a transport substrate or an allocrite Since in our view, in the vast majority
of cases, the component being transported remains unmodified by the process, the term
‘substrate’ is inappropriate, and we prefer allo-crite, a term we coined, loosely derived from the Greek meaning a substance transported or
ABC Proteins: From Bacteria to Man ISBN 0-12-352551-9
Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights of reproduction in any form reserved
8
I NTRODUCTION TO B ACTERIAL
ABC P ROTEINS
CHAPTER
Trang 2exported (Blight and Holland, 1990; Young and
Holland, 1999)
Probably the earliest detailed studies of ABC
proteins were carried out in bacteria in the
1970s and 1980s, concerning the mechanism of
uptake of solutes such as histidine and maltose,
mediated by the ABC proteins, HisP (Ames and
Nikaido, 1978) and MalK (Bavoil et al., 1980) in
Salmonella typhimurium and E coli, respectively.
These proteins were initially recognized as
binding ATP and subsequently as energy
generators for transport (Hobson et al., 1984;
Shuman and Silhavy, 1981), through the
hydrol-ysis of ATP As seen in Chapter 9, although we
still have much to learn concerning the
mecha-nism of transport driven by, for example, HisP
and MalK, structural and genetic studies of the
importing ABCs continue to be the most
advanced
ABC-ATPases are now recognized as one of the major superfamilies of proteins, represented
in all three kingdoms of life and found in all
organisms so far analyzed ABC proteins are
particularly abundant in prokaryotes, with
genes constituting from close to 1% and up to
more than 3% amongst the 19 eubacteria and
6 archaea, respectively, surveyed in Chapter 1
The very recent sequence of the Agrobacterium
tumefaciens genome describes the highest
num-ber recorded so far, 153, excluding orphan ABCs
(with no discernible membrane domain
associ-ates) Thus, ABC transporters constitute 60% of
all transporters and about 3% of all predicted
polypeptides in the A tumefaciens genome
(Goodner et al., 2001; Wood et al., 2001) All the
known bacterial genomes, with one exception,
Treponema pallidum (only 1.14 Mb), encode all the
three main categories of ABC protein discussed
below, the exporters, orphans and importers
Curiously, T pallidum and four out of the six
archaeal genomes listed in Chapter 1, apparently
do not encode any exporters
In Chapter 1, based on cluster or phylogeny analysis of sequences constituting the ABC
polypeptides, over 600 examples out of the more
than 2000 entries in the current databases, 33
distinct clusters were identified These are assigned so far to three major classes, all strongly represented in bacteria Class 1 contains the large family of exporters Class 2 is a small family of orphans, with no known membrane protein associates and, at least in some cases, with no connection to membrane transport processes, for example the bacterial UvrA protein essential for specific DNA repair processes Class 3 is func-tionally probably a more heterogeneous family, since it probably contains both importers and exporters This heterogeneity may necessitate a future separation into at least two distinct classes
Importantly, an additional important group of ABC proteins present in both bacteria and eukaryotes, which are not involved in trans-port but concerned with DNA repair or recom-bination, have yet to be classified as class 1, 2
or 3 and may well constitute a completely new class Such an example, the ABC domain of
Rad50 from Pyrococcus furiosus, involved in
homologous recombination, has recently been crystallized and the structure determined
(Hopfner et al., 2000) The ABC domain
con-tains the two characteristic lobes or arms found
in HisP (Hung et al., 1998) This contains all the
expected, highly conserved motifs, the Walker
A, Q-loop, Walker B and the downstream histidine (Linton and Higgins, 1998), present
in Arm-I, the RecA-like, catalytic domain
(Geourjon et al., 2001) Similarly, Rad50
con-tains the signature motif in the smaller Arm-II, sometimes referred to as the helical (Ames and Lecar, 1992) or signaling/regulatory domain (Holland and Blight, 1999) In reality, in the intact Rad50 molecule, the helical or signaling domain is interrupted by the insertion into helix 3 of 600 residues forming a long coiled coil region, thereby separating the Walker A from the Walker B domain Interestingly, as discussed in Chapter 11, structural studies so far indicate that functionally different types
of ABC protein display the greatest variation in
Trang 3structural organization in the helical domain,
frequently affecting helix 3
The extensive coiled coil region of Rad50, facilitating dimerization of these large
mol-ecules, restoring the close proximity of the
Walker A and B motifs for nucleotide binding,
is in fact diagnostic of a large family of bacterial
and eukaryote SMC (structural maintenance
of chromosome) proteins (Melby et al., 1998;
Soppa, 2001), many of which are involved in
condensation of DNA, including the SMC
pro-tein in B subtilis required for chromosomal
segregation (Graumann et al., 1998) Notably,
whereas Rad50 has a relatively well-conserved
LSGG motif compared with the ‘classical’ ABC
proteins, other SMCs have a more ‘degenerate’
version of this signature motif Finally, perhaps
the most distant relatives, but still considered
as ABC proteins (Aravind et al., 1999), are the
DNA repair enzymes such as the bacterial
MutS These proteins contain minimal Walker
A and B motifs and have the same overall fold
for the catalytic domain as HisP (Lamers et al.,
2000), but the signature motif is significantly
diverged from that of HisP, and indeed much
of the region equivalent to the helical domain
of HisP is absent (Geourjon et al., 2001).
Class 1 ABC-ATPases (fused to a membrane
domain), and apparently some class 3 proteins
(encoded independently from the membrane
domain), constitute at least eight distinct
fami-lies, all concerned with the export of a wide
range of compounds These include extremely
large polypeptides, greater than 400 kDa in
some cases (Chapter 11), polysaccharides, a
wide variety of antibiotics, many drugs
(Chapter 12), and certain lipids (Chapter 7) A
fascinating adaptation of the modular structure
of an ABC protein is shown in the ABC
compo-nent of the translocators for non-lantibiotics
secreted by Gram-positive bacteria In these
cases the N-terminal domain of the ABC
trans-porter carries a cytoplasmic extension to the
membrane domain (Havarstein et al., 1995),
which constitutes a cysteine protease, necessary
for processing the antibiotic peptide as it exits
from the cell (see Chapter 11) Some evidence
suggests that class 1 ABCs are also involved
in exporting fatty acids and Na⫹ions as
trans-port substrates or allocrites As reviewed in
Chapter 1, however, firm evidence for the
iden-tity of allocrites in many cases is still lacking
Importantly, whilst inferences regarding poten-tial allocrites for class 1 transporters can be drawn from cluster analysis through guilt by association with well-characterized transpor-ters, this approach is not necessarily reliable
One of the largest exporter families, DPL(see Chapter 1), contains at least 11 subfamilies of bacterial ABCs, which are involved in the export
of allocrites as diverse as lipids, large polypep-tides, or a wide range of drugs Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility that some of these transporters export in reality more than one type of compound, as has been demonstrated
for Pgp (Johnstone et al., 2000; Raymond et al.,
1992) As a further complication, the ABC trans-porters in the Prt and Hly clusters in the hetero-geneous DPL family require additional, specific auxiliary membrane proteins in order to com-plete, if not provide, the actual translocation pathway (Chapter 11)
Interestingly, from knowledge that is avail-able so far, the bacterial exporters appear to ful-fill a variety of important cellular functions, for example the secretion of factors required for dominating other bacterial species in the envi-ronment, for colonization of plant, insect or animal hosts leading to pathogenic infection or symbiosis, for the removal of toxic compounds and for the biogenesis of several constituents
of the organism’s own cellular envelope Many
of the latter are essential for respiratory func-tions, the integrity of the bilayer, simple surface protection and even movement of the bacteria
Moreover, some ABC exporters have been impli-cated in various developmental and differen-tiation programs, although their precise roles and allocrites transported in these cases are mostly obscure For further information and lit-erature sources on several of these aspects, see other chapters in Parts I and II in this volume
The class 2 group of ABC proteins are present in all organisms but are curious exceptions to the rule that the ABC proteins are always involved
in transport processes across membranes The functions of these proteins as a group are quite diverse and surprising, being involved in trans-lation of polypeptides, drug and antibiotic resist-ance, and in DNA repair, although only the latter two have been documented in bacteria so far (Chapter 1) It is intriguing to know what
Trang 4common principles might govern the action of
a highly conserved ABC domain involved in
processes as different as membrane transport,
DNA repair and protein synthesis Interestingly,
in the bacterial UvrA protein, a tandemly
dupli-cated ABC, there is an insertion of a DNA
bind-ing motif, a zinc fbind-inger, between the Walker A
and the signature motif in each ABC domain
(see, for example, Husain et al., 1986; Yamamoto
et al., 1996) This insertion occurs in a position
close to the equivalent of the interface between
the two lobes in the HisP structure, which
pre-sumably must affect the regulation of UvrA
function As a further curiosity, if not a mystery,
ABCs in this group of class 2 orphans include
proteins, also with duplicated ABC domains,
from, for example, Staphylococcus aureus and
Streptomyces antibioticus (Mendez and Salas,
2001; Ross et al., 1995), responsible for resistance
(and immunity in some cases) to certain drugs
and antibiotics The simplest explanation would
be that these ABCs do work in conjunction with
some membrane protein to export the drugs but,
despite intensive efforts, such proteins have not
yet been identified
The class 3 ABC transporters in bacteria
consti-tute an enormous family of import systems for
small molecules The transport complex is
com-posed of two molecules of an independently
encoded ABC protein(s), a hetero- or homodimer
of integral membrane proteins constituting the
translocation pathway, and an external
ligand-binding protein, amongst which the most
characterized, the periplasmic binding proteins
in Gram-negative bacteria are considered in
Chapter 10 The class 3 importers have been
assigned to at least nine major families in the
phylogeny analysis in Chapter 1 The allocrites
transported cover a wide range of essential and
non-essential molecules, including several metal
ions, iron chelates, vitamin B12, mono-, di- and
oligosaccharides, polyols, polyamines, inorganic
anions such as sulfate, nitrate and phosphate,
phosphonates, peptide osmoprotectants and
ssother di- and oligopeptides From these
examples, the import systems for histidine and
maltose will be considered in some detail in
Chapter 9, and for uptake of osmoprotectants
in Chapter 13 As already indicated, despite the
range of allocrites transported in this very large
family, the nature of the different translocators is
surprisingly uniform: an external ligand-binding
protein, free in the periplasm in Gram-negative bacteria whilst it may be anchored to the mem-brane surface in Gram-positive bacteria; two membrane proteins for transport, carrying the EAA interaction motif; and a highly conserved ABC protein on the cytoplasmic side of the inner membrane Since evidence of exchangeability
of one ABC component for another in these otherwise very similar systems has been rarely indicated in the literature, we must assume that each ABC is tailormade for contact and intramolecular signaling with its cognate mem-brane domains
Recent studies of two ABC-dependent solute uptake systems responsible for transport of general amino acids and branched amino acids
in Rhizobium leguminosarum have revealed the
surprising finding that such systems can
appar-ently also export these amino acids Moreover,
the same phenomenon was demonstrated with
histidine transport in S typhimurium (Hosie
et al., 2001) This reverse transport or
bidirec-tional capacity of these ABC transporters raises some complex questions concerning the solute pathway in the two different directions In addi-tion, it is not yet clear whether ATPase activity
is required for the efflux process (P Poole, per-sonal comunication)
Whereas great progress has been made in the comparative, phylogenic analysis of the ABC domains, leading to prediction of possible func-tion in the absence of other evidence in many cases, the cluster analysis of membrane domains has lagged far behind This clearly hampers insights into the mechanistic role of these domains as potential translocation pathways and these are poorly understood Nevertheless,
as discussed in Chapter 9, the early recognition
(Dassa and Hofnung, 1985) of the EAA motif,
apparently completely conserved without exception within a cytoplasmic loop of the membrane components of all the bacterial ABC importers, has ultimately led to the identifica-tion of this as a specific point of contact with a region of the helical domain of the ABC-ATPase
Trang 5This is presumably also a critical point in the
intramolecular signaling pathway, coordinating
transport and energy generation
Importantly, the EAA motif is not present in any of the exporters, indicating that during
evolution ABC-ATPases, in bacteria at least,
have associated with more than one type of
membrane domain Furthermore, the failure so
far to detect any kind of conserved motif in the
membrane domains of ABC exporters perhaps
emphasizes, in contrast to the importers, the
wide variation in both the mechanism and
the pathway of molecular signaling between
the membrane and ABC components of the
exporters As indicated below and discussed in
Chapter 7, the elucidation of the structure of
the membrane domain of the E coli MsbA
protein will now enormously stimulate this
aspect of ABC studies
Notably, some of the most advanced structural
studies of ABC transporters have come from
bac-terial import and, more recently, bacbac-terial export
systems Thus, we now have high-resolution
structures for ABC importers, HisP (Hung
et al., 1998), a MalK from Thermococcus litoralis
(Diederichs et al., 2000), one ABC in the family
of branched-chain amino acid transporters and
one of unknown function (Karpowich et al.,
2001; Yuan et al., 2001) In this laboratory, we
have recently obtained the high-resolution
structure of the ABC domain of HlyB (Schmitt
et al., in preparation), a member of the large
DPL family, which includes the mammalian
TAP and Pgp (Mdr1) proteins The implications
of all these structural advances will be
consid-ered in other chapters As discussed in Chapter
7, a very major and exciting advance in the
field was made by the presentation of the first
structural data at 4.5 Å for the intact bacterial
exporter MsbA from E coli (Chang and Roth,
2001) This provides the first sign of the nature
of the membrane domain, and, in particular,
that of the membrane-spanning domains
These are finally shown to be helices, settling
some previous controversies Most crucially, of
course, this overall structure of MsbA has
pro-found implications for at least a global
under-standing of how the action of the membrane
and ABC domains may be coordinated Chang and Roth (see also Higgins and Linton, 2001)
on the basis of this structure have already pro-posed an exciting solution to a long-standing puzzle – how close are the ABC domains in the transporter? – that most likely they are inter-faced at some point in the catalytic cycle (see also Chapter 6), but under the influence of the membrane domains they are well separated in the absence of any transport substrate Unfor-tunately, mechanistic studies of the nature of the catalytic cycle of ABC proteins in bacteria, and its relationship to the transport function, have lagged relatively far behind those for some of the mammalian proteins However, recent advances in purifying and reconstitut-ing proteins of the maltose and histidine uptake systems (see Chapter 9), combined with the power of microbial genetics, promise much for the future
Excitingly, as this volume goes to press the high-resolution structure of the bacterial ABC import system for vitamin B12, BtuCD, is
reported (Locher et al., Science 296, 1091–1098),
providing many new insights into the mecha-nism of ABC-dependent transport
Ames, G.F.-L and Lecar, H (1992) ATP-dependent bacterial transporters and cystic fibrosis: analogy between channels and transporters FASEB J 6, 2660–2666
Ames, G.F and Nikaido, K (1978)Identification
of a membrane protein as a histidine
trans-port component in Salmonella typhimurium.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75, 5447–5451
Aravind, L., Walker, D.R and Koonin, E.V.
(1999) Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems
Nucleic Acids Res 27, 1223–1242
Bavoil, P., Hofnung, M and Nikaido, H.
(1980) Identification of a cytoplasmic membrane-associated component of the
maltose transport system of Escherichia coli.
J Biol Chem 255, 8366–8369
Blight, M.A and Holland, I.B (1990)Structure and function of haemolysin B, P-glycoprotein and other members of a novel family of membrane translocators Mol Microbiol 4, 873–880
Braibant, M., Gilot, P and Content, J (2000)
The ATP binding cassette (ABC) transport
systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis FEMS
Microbiol Rev 24, 449–467
Trang 6Chang, G and Roth, C.B (2001)Structure of
MsbA from E coli: a homolog of the
multi-drug resistance ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters Science 293, 1793–1800
Dassa, E and Hofnung, M (1985) Sequence
of gene malG in E coli K12: homologies
between integral membrane components from binding protein-dependent transport systems EMBO J 4, 2287–2293
Diederichs, K., Diez, J., Greller, G., Müller, C.,
Breed, J., Schnell, C., Vonrhein, C., Boos, W.
and Welte, W (2000) Crystal structure of MalK, the ATPase subunit of the trehalose/
maltose ABC transporter of the archaeon
Thermococcus litoralis EMBO J 19, 5951–5961.
Fath, M.J and Kolter, R (1993) ABC
trans-porters: bacterial exporters Microbiol Rev
57, 995–1017
Geourjon, C., Orelle, C., Steinfels, E., Blanchet,
C., Deleage, G., Di Pietro, A and Jault J.M.
(2001)A common mechanism for ATP hydro-lysis in ABC transporter and helicase super-families Trends Biochem Sci 26, 539–544
Goodner, B., Hinkle, G., Gattung, S., Miller, N.,
Blanchard, M., Qurollo, B., et al (2001)
Genome sequence of the plant pathogen
and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 Science 294, 2323–2328.
Graumann, P.L., Losick, R and Strunnikov, A.V.
(1998)Subcellular localization of Bacillus sub-tilis SMC, a protein involved in chromosome
condensation and segregation J Bacteriol
180, 5749–5755
Havarstein, L.S., Diep, D.B and Nes, I.F.
(1995) A family of bacteriocin ABC trans-porters carry out proteolytic processing of their substrates concomitant with export
Mol Microbiol 16, 229–240
Higgins, C.F and Linton, K.J (2001)The xyz of
ABC transporters Science 293, 1782–1784
Hobson, A.C., Weatherwas, R and Ames, G.F.
(1984) ATP-binding sites in the membrane components of histidine permease, a peri-plasmic transport system Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 81, 7333–7337
Holland, I.A and Blight, M.A (1999)
ABC-ATPases, adaptable energy generators fuel-ling transmembrane movement of a variety
of molecules in organisms from bacteria to humans J Mol Biol 293, 381–399
Hopfner, K.-P., Karcher, A., Shin, D.S.,
Craig, L., Arthur, L.M., Carney, J.P and Tainer, J.A (2000)Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control
in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily Cell 101, 789–800
Hosie, A.H.F., Allaway, D., Jones, M.A., Walshaw, D.L., Johnston, A.W.B and Poole, P.S (2001) Solute-binding protein-dependent ABC transporters are responsible for solute efflux in addition to solute uptake Mol Microbiol 40, 1449–1459
Hung, L.-W., Wang, I.X., Nikaido, K., Liu, P.-Q., Ames, G.F.-L and Kim, S.-H (1998)Crystal structure of the ATP-binding subunit of an ABC transporter Nature 396, 703–707
Husain, I., van Houten, B., Thomas, D.C and Sancar, A (1986)Sequences of the uvrA gene
and protein reveal two potential ATP bind-ing sites J Biol Chem 261, 4895–4901
Hyde, S.C., Emsley, P., Hartshorn, M.J., Mimmack, M.M., Gileadi, U., Pearce, S.R., Gallagher, M.P., Gill, D.R., Hubbard, R.E and Higgins, C.F (1990)Structural model of ATP-binding proteins associated with cystic fibrosis, multidrug resistance and bacterial transport Nature 346, 362–365
Johnstone, R.W., Ruefli, A.A and Smyth, M.J (2000) Multiple physiological functions for multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein? Trends Biochem Sci 25, 1–6
Karpowich, N., Martsinkevich, O., Millen, L., Yuan, Y.-R., Dai, P.L., MacVey, K., Thomas, P.J and Hunt, J.F (2001)Crystal structures
of the MJ1267 ATP binding cassette reveal an induced-fit effect at the ATPase active site of
an ABC transporter Structure 9, 571–586
Lamers, M.H., Perrakis, A., Enzlin, J.H., Winterwerp, H.H.K., de Wind, N and Sixma T.K (2000) The crystal structure of DNA mismatch repair protein MutS binding
to a G.T mismatch Nature 407, 711–717
Linton, K.J and Higgins, C.F (1998) The
Escherichia coli ATP-binding cassette (ABC)
proteins Mol Microbiol 28, 5–13
Melby, T.E., Ciampaglio, C.N., Briscoe, E and Erickson, H.P (1998)The symmetrical struc-ture of structural maintenance of chromo-somes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge J Cell Biol 142, 1595–1604
Mendez, C and Salas, J.A (2001)The role of ABC transporters in antibiotic-producing organisms: drug secretion and resistance mechanisms Res Microbiol 152, 341–350
Quentin, Y., Fichant, G and Denizot, F (1999)
Inventory, assembly and analysis of Bacillus subtilis ABC transport systems J Mol Biol.
287, 467–484
Raymond, M., Gros, P., Whiteway, M and Thomas, D.Y (1992) Functional
comple-mentation of yeast ste6 by a mammalian
Trang 7multidrug resistance mdr gene Science 256,
232–234
Ross, J.I., Eady, E.A., Cove, J.H and Baumberg,
S (1995) Identification of a chromosomally encoded ABC-transport system with which the staphylococcal erythromycin exporter MsrA may interact Gene 153, 93–98
Shuman, H.A and Silhavy, T.J (1981)
Identification of the malK gene product
A peripheral membrane component of the
Escherichia coli maltose transport system
J Biol Chem 256, 560–562
Soppa, J (2001)Prokaryotic structural
mainte-nance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins: dis-tribution, phylogeny, and comparison with MukBs and additional prokaryotic and eukaryotic coiled-coil proteins Gene 278, 253–264
Wood, D.W., Setubal, J.C., Kaul, R.,
Monks, D.E., Kitajima, J.P., Okura V.K.,
et al (2001) The genome of the natural
genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens
C58 Science 294, 2317–2323
Yamamoto, N., Kato, R and Kuramitsu, S.
(1996) Cloning, sequencing and expression
of the uvrA gene from an extremely ther-mophilic bacterium, Thermus thermophilus
HB8 Gene 171, 103–106
Young, J and Holland, I.B (1999)ABC trans-porters: bacterial exporters-revisited five years on Biochim Biophys Acta 1461, 177–200
Yuan, Y.R., Blecker, S., Martsinkevich, O., Millen, L., Thomas, P.J and Hunt, J.F (2001)
The crystal structure of the MJO796 ATP-binding cassette Implications for the struc-tural consequences of ATP hydrolysis in the active site of an ABC transporter
J Biol Chem 276, 32313–32321