DSpace at VNU: Optimal adaptive sampling recovery tài liệu, giáo án, bài giảng , luận văn, luận án, đồ án, bài tập lớn v...
Trang 1DOI 10.1007/s10444-009-9140-9
Optimal adaptive sampling recovery
Dinh D ˜ung
Received: 29 April 2009 / Accepted: 25 August 2009 /
Published online: 16 September 2009
© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009
Abstract We propose an approach to study optimal methods of adaptive
sampling recovery of functions by sets of a finite capacity which is measured by
their cardinality or pseudo-dimension Let W ⊂ L q , 0 < q ≤ ∞, be a class of
functions onId := [0, 1] d For B a subset in L q , we define a sampling recovery
method with the free choice of sample points and recovering functions from
B as follows For each f ∈ W we choose n sample points This choice defines
n sampled values Based on these sampled values, we choose a function from
B for recovering f The choice of n sample points and a recovering function from B for each f ∈ W defines a sampling recovery method S B
n by functions
in B An efficient sampling recovery method should be adaptive to f Given a
familyB of subsets in L q, we consider optimal methods of adaptive sampling
recovery of functions in W by B from Bin terms of the quantity
that the cardinality of B does not exceed 2 n , and by r n (W) qifBis the family
of all subsets B in L q of pseudo-dimension at most n Let 0 < p, q, θ ≤ ∞
andα satisfy one of the following conditions: (i) α > d/p; (ii) α = d/p, θ ≤
min(1, q), p, q < ∞ Then for the d-variable Besov class U α
Information Technology Institute, Vietnam National University,
Hanoi 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
e-mail: dinhdung@vnu.edu.vn
Trang 2To construct asymptotically optimal adaptive sampling recovery methods
for e n (U α
p ,θ ) q and r n (U α
p ,θ ) q we use a quasi-interpolant wavelet tion of functions in Besov spaces associated with some equivalent discretequasi-norm
representa-Keywords Adaptive sampling recovery · Quasi-interpolant wavelet
representation· B-spline · Besov space
Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000) 41A46 · 41A05 · 41A25 · 42C40
1 Introduction
We are interested in problems of sampling recovery of functions defined on
the unit d-cubeId := [0, 1] d Let L q := L q (Id ), 0 < q ≤ ∞, denote the
quasi-normed space of functions onId with the usual qth integral quasi-norm · q
for 0< q < ∞, and the normed space C(Id ) of continuous functions onIdwiththe max-norm · ∞for q= ∞ We consider sampling recoveries of functions
from a class of a certain smoothness W ⊂ L q by functions from a subset B
in L q The recovery error will be measured in the norm · q We will focus
our attention to optimal methods of adaptive sampling recovery of functions
in W by subsets B of a finite capacity which is measured by their cardinality
or pseudo-dimension Let us first recall some well-known sampling recoverymethods
Suppose that f is a function in W and ξ = {x k}n
k=1are n points inId We want
to approximately recover f from the sampled values f (x1), f(x2), , f(x n ) A
general sampling recovery method can be defined as
k=1are given n functions onId
To study optimal sampling methods of recovery for f ∈ W from n their
values, we can use the quantity
g n (W) q := inf
H ,ξ supf ∈W f − R n (H, ξ, f ) q ,
where the infimum is taken over all sequencesξ = {x k}n
k=1and all mappings H
Trang 3as the unit ball of the Besov space B α p ,θ , having a fractional smoothness α > 0
(the definition of this space is given in Section2) Notice that in problems ofsampling recovery, other classes such as well-known Sobolev and Lizorkin-Triebel classes, etc can be considered (see [22])
We use the notations: x+:= max(0, x) for x ∈R; A n ( f ) B n ( f ) if
A n ( f ) ≤ CB n ( f ) with C an absolute constant not depending on n and/or
f ∈ W, and A n ( f ) B n ( f ) if A n ( f ) B n ( f ) and B n ( f ) A n ( f ).
It is known the following result (see [10,19,21,22,26] and references there).Let 0< p, q ≤ ∞, 0 < θ ≤ ∞ and α > d/p Then there is a linear sampling recovery method L∗nof the form (1.2) such that
f − L∗
n ( f ) q n −α/d+(1/p−1/q)+. (1.3)
This result says that the linear sampling recovery method L∗nis asymptotically
optimal in the sense that any sampling recovery method R nof the form (1.1)
does not give the rate of convergence better than L∗n
Sampling recovery methods of the form (1.1) which may be linear ornon-linear are non-adaptive, i.e., the pointsξ = {x k}n
k=1 at which the values
f (x1), , f(x n ) are sampled, and the recovery method R n are the same for
all functions f ∈ W Let us introduce a setting of adaptive sampling recovery
which will give the asymptotic order of the recovery error better than the adaptive sampling recovery in some cases
non-Let B be a subset in L q We will define a sampling recovery method with the free choice of sample points and recovering functions from B Roughly speaking, for each f ∈ W we choose a set of n sample points This choice defines a collection of n sampled values Based on the information of these sampled values, we choose a function from B for recovering f The choice of
n sample points and a recovering function from B for each f ∈ W defines a sampling recovery method S n B by functions in B Let us give a precise notion
of S B n
Denote by I n the set of subsetsξ in Id of cardinality at most n Let V n
be the set whose elements are collections of real numbers a ξ = {a(x)} x ∈ξ ,
ξ ∈ I n , a(x) ∈R(for a ξ , b η∈V n , we write by definition a ξ = b η if and only
ifξ = η and a(x) = b(x) for any x ∈ ξ) Let I n be a mapping from W into I n
and P a mapping from V n into B Then the pair (I n , P) generates the mapping
S B n from W into B by the formula
P can be treated as a mapping H fromRn into L q
We want to choose a sampling recovery method S B
n so that the error ofthis recovery f − S B ( f ) qis as smaller as possible Clearly, such an efficient
Trang 4choice should be adaptive to f The error of an optimal adaptive sampling recovery method for each f ∈ W, is measured by
R n B ( f ) q:= inf
S B n
Given a familyB of subsets in L q, we consider optimal sampling recoveries by
B from Bin terms of the quantity
R n (W, B ) q:= inf
B ∈B R
B
We assume a restriction on the sets B∈B, requiring that they should have,
in some sense, a finite capacity In the present paper, the capacity of B is
measured by its cardinality or pseudo-dimension This reasonable restriction
would provide nontrivial lower bounds of asymptotic order of R n (W, B ) qfor
well known function classes W Denote R n (W, B ) q by e n (W) q ifBin (1.5) is
the family of all subsets B in L q such that|B| ≤ 2 n, where |B| denotes the cardinality of B , and by r n (W) qifBin (1.5) is the family of all subsets B in L q
of pseudo-dimension at most n.
The quantity e n (W) q is related to the entropy n-width (entropy number)
ε n (W) qwhich is the functional inverse of the classicalε-entropy introduced by
Kolmogorov and Tikhomirov [18] The quantity r n (W) qis related to the
non-linear n-width ρ n (W) qintroduced recently by Ratsaby and Maiorov [24] (Seethe definition ofε n (W) qandρ n (W) qinAppendix)
The pseudo-dimension of a set B of real-valued functions on a set defined as follows For a real number t, let sgn (t) be 1 for t > 0 and −1 otherwise For x∈Rn, let sgn(x) = (sgn(x1), sgn(x2), , sgn(x n )) The pseudo- dimension of B is defined as the largest integer n such that there exist points
a1, a2, , a nin Rnsuch that the cardinality of the set
an important role in theory of pattern recognition and regression estimation,empirical processes and computational learning theory Thus, in the probably
approximately correct (PAC) learning model, if B is a set of real-valued
functions on
distribution on
accuracyε and probability 1 − δ by just knowing its values at m randomly
Trang 5sample points from 24,25]) If B is a n-dimensional linear manifold of real-valued functions on p(B) = n
(see [16])
We say that p , q, θ, α satisfy Condition (1.6) if
0< p, q, θ ≤ ∞, α < ∞, and there holds one of the following restrictions: (i) α > d/p;
The main results of the present paper are read as follows
Theorem 1.1 Let p , q, θ, α satisfy Condition (1.6) Then for the d-variable Besov class U α p ,θ , there is the following asymptotic order
n () in terms of the quantity
s n (W, ) q := R n ()
n (W) q The quantity s n (W, ) q has been introduced in [14] in another equivalentform (with the notationν n (W, ) q ) Let us recall it For each function f ∈ W,
we choose a sequenceξ = {x s}n
s=1 of n points inId , a sequence a = {a s}n
s=1 of
n functions onRn and a sequence n = {ϕ k s}n
s=1 of n functions from This
choice defines a sampling recovery method given by
The optimal adaptive sampling recovery in terms of the quantity s n (W, ) q
is related to the quantityσ n (W, ) q of non-linear n-term approximation which characterizes the approximation of W by functions from n () (see the
definition in Appendix) The reader can find in [7, 27] surveys on various
Trang 6aspects of this approximation and its applications Let us recall some results
in [15] on adaptive sampling recovery in regard to the quantity s n (W, ) q
For a given natural number r , let M be the centered B-spline of even order
2r with support[−r, r] and knots at the integer points −r, , 0, , r, and define
B-spline wavelets
M k,s (x) := M(2 k x − s), for a non-negative integer k and s∈Z Then M is the set of all M k ,swhich do
not vanish identically onI The following result was proven in [15]
Let 1≤ p, q ≤ ∞, 0 < θ ≤ ∞, and 1 < α < min(2r, 2r − 1 + 1/p) Then for the the univariate Besov class U α p ,θ, there is the following asymptotic order
p ,θ , M) qwhich gives the upper bound of (1.7) we used the following
quasi-interpolant wavelet representation of functions in the Besov space B α p ,θ
in terms of the B-spline wavelet system M associated with some equivalent
discrete quasi-norm If 1≤ p ≤ ∞, 0 < θ ≤ ∞, and 1 < α < min(2r, 2r − 1 +
1/p), then a function f in the Besov space B α
p ,θcan be represented as a series
with the convergence in B α p ,θ , where J (k) is the set of s for which M k,sdo not
vanish identically onI, and c k,s ( f ) are functions of a finite number of values of
f which does not depend on neither k , s nor f Moreover, the quasi-norm of
B α p ,θ is equivalent to the discrete quasi-norm
con-In the present paper, we also extend (1.7) to the case 0< p, q ≤ ∞ and
α ≥ d/p, and generalize it for multivariate functions on the d-cube Id In
particular, important is the case 0< p < 1 or 0 < q < 1 which are of great
interest in non-linear approximations (see [7,9]) To get d-variable B-spline
Trang 7M k,s (x) := M(2 k x − s), for a non-negative integer k and s∈Zd Denote again by M the set of all M k ,s
which do not vanish identically onId We prove the following theorem.
Theorem 1.2 Let p , q, θ, α satisfy Condition (1.6) and α < min(2r, 2r − 1 +
1/p) Then for the d-variable Besov class U α
p,θ , there is the following asymptotic
upper bound for e n (U α
Notice that the quantities e n (W) q and r n (W) q are absolute in the sense of
optimal sampling recovery methods, while the quantity s n (W, ) qdepends on
a system However, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 show that e n (U α
on sampling recovery considered only the caseα > d/p In Theorems 1.1 and
1.2, we receive some results also for the caseα = d/p, θ ≤ min(1, q), 0 < p,
q < ∞ of the Besov class U α
p ,θ.
In the present paper, we consider optimal adaptive sampling recoveries forthe Besov class of multivariate functions Results similar to Theorems 1.1 and1.2 are also true for the Sobolev and Lizorkin-Triebel classes of multivariatefunctions
The paper is organized as follows
In Section2, we give a definition of quasi-interpolant form functions on
Id, construct a quasi-interpolant wavelet representation in terms of the
B-spline dictionary M for Besov spaces and prove some quasi-norm equivalences
based on this representation, in particular, a discrete quasi-norm in terms of
Trang 8the coefficient functionals In Sections 3 and 4, we prove Theorem 1.1 InSection3, we prove the asymptotic order of r n (U α
p ,θ ) q in Theorem 1.1 and of
s n (U α
p ,θ , M) q in Theorem 1.2 and construct asymptotically optimal adaptive
sampling recovery methods which give the upper bound for r n (U α
p ,θ ) q and
s n (U α
p ,θ , M) q In Section 4, we prove the asymptotic order of e n (U α
p ,θ ) q inTheorem 1.1 and construct asymptotically optimal adaptive sampling recovery
methods which give the upper bound for e n (U α
p ,θ ) q InAppendixin Section5,
we give some auxiliary notions and results on non-linear approximations whichare employed, in particular, in establishing the lower bounds in Theorems 1.1and 1.2
2 Quasi-interpolant wavelet representations in Besov spaces
Let = {λ( j)} j ∈P d (μ) be a finite even sequence, i.e., λ(− j) = λ( j), where
P d (μ) := { j ∈Zd : | j i | ≤ μ, i = 1, 2, , d} We define the linear operator Q for functions f onRdby
Moreover, Q is local in the following sense There is a positive number
δ > 0 such that for any f ∈ C(Rd ) and x ∈Rd , Q( f, x) depends only on the value f (y) at a finite number of points y with |y i − x i | ≤ δ, i = 1, 2, d We will require Q to reproduce the space P d
2r−1 of polynomials of order at most
2r− 1 in each variable x i, that is,
construc-p 100–109]) De Bore and Fix [5] introduced another quasi-interpolant based
on the values of derivatives The reader can see also the books [3,6] for surveys
on quasi-interpolants
Trang 9Let d be a d-cube in Rd Denote by L p
0
the max-norm · for p= ∞
If τ be a number such that 0 < τ ≤ min(p, 1), then for any sequence of
functions{ f k} there is the inequality
f (x + jh).
For 0< p, θ ≤ ∞ and 0 < α < l, the Besov space B α
p ,θis the set of functions
f ∈ L pfor which the Besov quasi-semi-norm| f| B α p,θis finite The Besov semi-norm| f| B α p,θ is given by
We will assume that continuous functions to be recovered are from the
Besov space B α p,θ with the restriction on the smoothness α ≥ 1/p which is a condition for the embedding of this space into C (Id ).
If { f k}∞
k=0 is a sequence whose component functions f k are in L p , for
0< p, θ ≤ ∞ and β ≥ 0 we use the b β θ (L p ) “quasi-norms”
Trang 10by{ f k}b β θ We will need the following discrete Hardy inequality Let {a k}∞
with C = C(β, θ) (see, e.g, [8])
For the Besov space B α p ,θ , there is the following quasi-norm equivalence
If Q of is a quasi-interpolant of the form (2.1–2.2), for h > 0 and a function f
onRd , we define the operator Q hby
The operator Q (·; h) has the same properties as Q: it is a local bounded
linear operator inRdand reproduces the polynomials fromP d
its sampled values at points inId An approach to construct a quasi-interpolant
for a function onIdis to extend it by interpolation Lagrange polynomials Thisapproach has been proposed in [15] for the univariate case Let us recall it
For a non-negative integer m , we put x j = j2 −m , j ∈Z If f is a function
Trang 11intervalI, respectively The function ¯f is defined as an extension of f onRbythe formula
Obviously, if f is continuous onI, then ¯f is a continuous function onR Let Q
be a quasi-interpolant of the form (2.1–2.2) in C (R) We introduce the operator
Q mby putting
Q m ( f, x) = Q( ¯f, x; 2 −m ), x ∈I, for a function f onI We have
Q m ( f, x) =
s ∈J(m)
a m,s ( f )M m,s (x), ∀x ∈I, (2.8)
where J (m) := {s ∈Z: −r < s < 2 m + r} is the set of s for which M m,sdo not
vanish identically onI, and
a m,s ( f ) := ( ¯f, s; 2 −m ) =
| j|≤μ
λ( j) ¯f(2 −m (s − j)). (2.9)
The operator Q m is called a quasi-interpolant for C (I).
We now give a multivariate generalization of the univariate
quasi-interpolant Q m For this purpose we rewrite the coefficient functionals a m,s ( f ) for the definition of Q m , in a more suitable form Let b be a function of discrete variable k ∈ Z(m) where Z(m) := {s ∈Z: 0 ≤ s ≤ 2 m } For non- negative integer l , put Z(m, l) := {s ∈Z: −l < s < 2 m + l} We extend b to
the function Ext(b) on Z(m, r + μ) by the formula
b (k + j).
A function f onIdefines a function b f on Z (m) by b f (k) := f(2 −m k ) From
(2.6), (2.7) and (2.10) it is easily to see that
Ext(b f , k) := ¯f(2 −m k ),
Trang 12and consequently, we can rewrite the coefficient functionals a m,s ( f ) given in
Moreover, the number of the terms in Q m ( f ) is of the size ≈ 2 dm
Similar to the quasi-interpolants Q and Q (·; h), the operator Q mis a local
bounded linear mapping in C (Id ) and reproducing P d
Trang 13set dyadic cubes I of the size 2 −mwhich are contained in
of s for which M m,sdo not vanish identically on
with a constant C depending on r , d, p only.
If 0< p ≤ ∞, for all non-negative integers m and all functions
If 0< p, θ ≤ ∞ and 0 < α < min(2r, 2r − 1 + 1/p), then for a function f on
Id belongs to the Besov space B α p,θ if and only if f can be represented by the
Trang 14Moreover, the Besov quasi-norm B ( f ) is equivalent to one of the quasi-norms
B i ( f ), i = 2, 3, 4, where
B3( f ) := { f − P k ( f )} b α θ (L p ) + f p ,
B4( f ) := {E k ( f ) p}b α θ + f p Let us recall some well-known embeddings of spaces B α p ,θ For 0< p, q,
θ ≤ ∞, α > 0 and α > δ := d(1/p − 1/q)+, there is the inequality
f B α−δ q,θ ≤ C f B α p ,θ , (2.22)
and consequently, B α p ,θ is continuously embedded into B α−δ q ,θ Further, if
0< p, θ ≤ ∞ and α ≥ d/p, then B α
p ,θ is continuously embedded into C (Id ),
and there is the inequality
This means that a function in B α p ,θ will be continuous by correcting its values
in a set of zero measure In this sense, we will consider B α p ,θ withα ≥ d/p, as a subset of C (Id ) Notice also that the inequality α > d/p provides the compact embedding of B α p ,θ into C (Id ).
For a I = I s ∈ D(m), let ˜I = ˜I s be the d-cube which is the union of the d-cubes I j ∈ D(m), j ∈ Z s (μ + r), where Z s (l) := { j ∈ J(m) : | j i − s i | ≤ l,
i = 1, 2, , d}.
Lemma 2.1 Let 0 < p ≤ ∞ and I ∈ D(m) Then for any continuous function f
onId , we have
Q m ( f ) ∞,I ≤ f ∞, ˜I , and, if in addition, f ∈ (m), we have
Trang 15Q m ( f ) ∞,I ≤ max
j ∈Z s (μ+r) f ∞,I j = f ∞, ˜I (2.24)
If in addition, f ∈ (m), then from (2.24) it follows that
Q m ( f ) p ,I s ≤ |I s|1/p Q m ( f ) ∞,I s ≤ |I s|1/p max
j ∈Z s (μ+r) f ∞,I j Since f is a polynomial on each I j , j ∈ Z s (μ + r), there is the inequality
with some constant C depending on r , μ, d and only.
Proof Let f ∈ (k) and k ≥ m We have
Trang 16= C p2d(k−m) f p
p
Let Id is a d-cube We will need the following modified modulus of
with constants C1, C2which depend on l , p, d only (see [9])
Lemma 2.3 Let 0 < p ≤ ∞ and f ∈ L p Then we have
P m ( f ) − Q m (P m ( f )) p ≤ Cω2r ( f, 2 −m ) p
with some constant C depending on r , μ, p, d and only.
Proof Below we will denote by C j a constant depending at most on r , μ, p, d
and In order to prove this lemma we will use Lemma 2.1 and a technique
in the proof of Theorem 4.5 in [9] For a d-cube
Trang 17Let I s ∈ D(m), and g be the polynomial of best L p ( ˜I s ) approximation by
Letϕ be any polynomial in P d
2r−1 There holds the inequality
Trang 18Using the last estimation and (2.26) we derive that
Lemma 2.4 Let 0 < p ≤ ∞ and θ ≤ min(p, 1) Then for any f ∈ L p , there holds the inequality
with some constant C depending at most on r , μ, p and , whenever the sum
in the right-hand side is finite.
Proof Let f ∈ L p be a function such that the sum in the right-hand side of(2.28) is finite We have by (2.3)
Trang 19We obtain by (2.17)
f − P m ( f ) p ≤ Cω2r ( f, 2 −m ) p , (2.30)and by Lemma 2.3
The following corollary is immediately implied from the last lemma
Corollary 2.1 Let 0 < p, q, θ ≤ ∞, 0 < α = d/p < 2r, θ ≤ min(1, q) Then for any f ∈ B α
Trang 20Further, from the inequality q k ( f) p f −Q k ( f) p + f −Q k−1( f) p ,
Combining (2.34–2.37) completes the proof of Theorem 2.1
According to Theorem 2.1, a function f ∈ B α
p ,θ has the decomposition
de-in terms of the B-splde-ines M k ,s ∈ M, and an associated discrete equivalent
quasi-norm for the functional coefficients By using the B-spline refinement
equation, one can represent the component functions q k ( f ) as
q k ( f ) =
s ∈J(k)
where c k ,s are certain coefficient functionals of f , which are defined as follows.
For the univariate case, we put
...choice defines a sampling recovery method given by
The optimal adaptive sampling recovery in terms of the quantity s n (W, ) q
is related to the quantityσ... 6
aspects of this approximation and its applications Let us recall some results
in [15] on adaptive sampling recovery in regard to the quantity...
Notice that the quantities e n (W) q and r n (W) q are absolute in the sense of
optimal sampling recovery methods, while