AdS aAdS Fully nonlinear: Consider Gaussian-type initial data w/ amplitude and width σChoptuik-type critical behavior However, sub-critical eventually collapses as well Perturbative abo
Trang 1Revisiting Scalar Collapse in AdS
New Frontiers in Dynamical GravityDAMTP, Cambridge
Steve Liebling
With:
Venkat Balasubramanian (Western) Alex Buchel (Western/PI)
Stephen Green (Guelph) Luis Lehner (Perimeter)
Long Island University New York, USA
March 24, 2014
Trang 2Instability of Scalar Field in spher symm aAdS
Evolution of a Scalar field in sph symm., asympt AdS (aAdS)
Fully nonlinear:
Consider Gaussian-type initial data w/ amplitude and width σChoptuik-type critical behavior
However, sub-critical eventually collapses as well
Perturbative about pure AdS:
At linear order, uncoupled modes: oscillon
Trang 3Instability in light of AdS/CFT Correspondence
Holographic duality between
(d + 1)-dimensional global AdS (the bulk)and
× R)Dictionary translates between bulk quantities of aAdS spacetime
and quantum operators of CFT
Interpretation of instability:
initial data generically thermalizes by BH formation
but are there non-thermalizing initial configurations in the CFT?
Trang 4Paths to Stability
Perturbative analysis showing stable solutions
[Dias,Horowitz,Marolf,Santos,1208.5772]
Argue perturbatively for nonlinear stability
Geons and boson stars, not necessarily spher symm
Excite all modes
Ajr Cj1j2j3jr, where the triple sum
is over all the resonance channels ωj1+ ωj2 = ωjr+ ωj3
Time-periodic solutions
[Maliborski,Rostworowski,1303.3186]
Construct time-periodic solutions
Argue for nonlinear stability
Frustrated resonance
[Buchel,SLL,Lehner,1304.4166]
Trang 5Frustrated Resonance
[Buchel,SLL,Lehner,1304.4166]Broadly distrib energy perturbs AdS & introduces dispersion Dispersion competes with nonlinear sharpening
BR data: increasing σ increases distribution of energy
Issues with σ-parameterization:
Trang 6Perturbed Boson Star
Trang 7Effect of Mass [Balasubramanian,Buchel,Green,Lehner,SLL,in prep]
Motivation: explore CFT operators of different weight
mass changes decay rate of SF at boundary
No dispersion at linear order
µ 2
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
σcrit
Trang 8Open Questions
Among others, just two here:
What’s stable and what’s unstable?
in other words, can we identify whether initial data will
collapse for any amplitude a priori?
For ID that appears unstable, can we be sure whether it
using “unstable” as ID that collapses for → 0 but 6= 0
Trang 9Two-Time Formalism (TTF)
Dynamics characterized by two time scales:
fast time t–generally t < π where π is time for a bounce offboundary
slow time τ –scale over which energy transfers among oscillons,
Both direct and inverse cascades
Resembles FPUT paradox
Trang 10TTF and Fermi-Pasta-Ulam-Tsingou (FPUT, 1953)
Model 1D atoms in a crystal by masses linked by springs with nonlinear term
At linear order, Fourier modes decouple
predicted by classical stat mech.
apparently still debated more than 50 years later!
[D Campbell’s APS 2010 talk]
Trang 11TTF and Fully Nonlinear two-mode ID
Trang 12TTF and Quasi-Periodic (QP) Solutions
Trang 13(Approximate) QP Solution Evolved Fully Nonlinearly
2 t 1.45
1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75
Trang 14Engineered Initial Data (ID)
Form of ID for fully nonlinear evolutions
Exponential energy ID: cj = e−αj/(3 + 2j )
Trang 15Two-mode Stable Solutions
Equal-Energy Two-Mode Initial Data: Modes 0 and 1: cj= e0/3 + e1/5
2t1
2345678910
Trang 16Two-mode Stable Solutions
Equal-Energy Two-Mode Initial Data: Modes 0 and 1: cj= e0/3 + e1/5
2t1
2345678910
Trang 17Two-mode Stable Solutions
Equal-Energy Two-Mode Initial Data: Modes 0 and 1: cj= e0/3 + e1/5
Left from: Benettin,Carati,Galgani,Giorgilli, 2008]
Trang 18Other stable solutions
Three-Mode Initial Data: Modes 1, 3, and 8: cj= e1/10 + e3+ e8/10
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
2t4.2
4.44.64.85.05.25.4
Trang 19Other stable solutions
Three-Mode Initial Data: Modes 1, 3, and 8: cj= e1/10 + e3+ e8/10
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
2t4.2
4.44.64.85.05.25.4
Trang 20Other (possibly) stable solutions
Three-Mode Initial Data: Modes 1, 3, and 8: cj= e1+ e3+ e8
not one-mode dominant
2 t 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Trang 21Other (possibly) stable solutions
Exponential Amplitude: cj= e−αj for α = 0.575
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
2t3
45678910
Trang 22Take-home Points
TTF formalism most useful, perturbative approach
as TTF; resonant and nonresonant regimes
Stability regions
resonance (regardless of deficiencies in large-σ
parameterization)
Trang 23Uncanny resemblance!
FPUT and 2-Mode 0-1 Equal Energy FNL