• What can we learn about hydrodynamics using gauge/gravity duality?... • What can we learn about hydrodynamics using gauge/gravity duality?. • What can we learn about hydrodynamics usin
Trang 1Koushik Balasubramanian
YITP, Stony Brook University
New Frontiers in Dynamical Gravity, 2014
Trang 3Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 4• What can we learn about hydrodynamics
using gauge/gravity duality?
Trang 5• What can we learn about hydrodynamics
using gauge/gravity duality?
• What can we learn about gravity?
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 6• What can we learn about hydrodynamics
using gauge/gravity duality?
• What can we learn about gravity?
• What happens far from equilibrium?
Trang 7• What can we learn about hydrodynamics
using gauge/gravity duality?
• What can we learn about gravity?
• What happens far from equilibrium?
• When is hydro not a good description?
(Breakdown of gradient expansion)
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 8Thanks to Computers
Trang 9Why numerics?
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 10Why numerics?
• I can’t think of any other way
Trang 11Why numerics?
• I can’t think of any other way
• Numerical techniques are well-developed
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 12Why numerics?
• I can’t think of any other way
• Numerical techniques are well-developed
• We can face nonlinear PDEs with courage
Trang 13Why numerics?
• I can’t think of any other way
• Numerical techniques are well-developed
• We can face nonlinear PDEs with courage
• Computers can stay awake longer than
humans
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 14Why numerics?
• I can’t think of any other way
• Numerical techniques are well-developed
• We can face nonlinear PDEs with courage
• Computers can stay awake longer than
humans
• We can produce some nice screen-savers
Trang 15Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 16• I’ll start by showing some screen-savers
Trang 17• I’ll start by showing some screen-savers
• Counterflow
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 18• I’ll start by showing some screen-savers
• Counterflow
• Shockwave
Trang 20• I’ll start by showing some screen-savers
• Counterflow
• Shockwave
• Lattice induced momentum-relaxation.
• linear regime-hydro & gravity
Trang 21• I’ll start by showing some screen-savers
• Counterflow
• Shockwave
• Lattice induced momentum-relaxation.
• linear regime-hydro & gravity
• nonlinear regime-hydro & gravity
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 22Counterflow
Trang 23Vorticity Profile as a function of time
Counterflow
• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 24• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
Trang 25Vorticity Profile as a function of time
Counterflow
• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 26• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
• periodic bc
Trang 27Vorticity Profile as a function of time
Counterflow
• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
Trang 28• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
• periodic bc
• Python/F2py (and Matlab)
Carrasco, Lehner, Myers (2012); Adams, Chesler, Liu (2013)
Trang 29Vorticity Profile as a function of time
Counterflow
• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
• periodic bc
• Python/F2py (and Matlab)
Carrasco, Lehner, Myers (2012); Adams, Chesler, Liu (2013)
• Kolmogrov scaling; fractal-like structure of horizon
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 30• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
• periodic bc
• Python/F2py (and Matlab)
Carrasco, Lehner, Myers (2012); Adams, Chesler, Liu (2013)
• Kolmogrov scaling; fractal-like structure of horizon
• Forced/Driven Turbulence?
Trang 31Vorticity Profile as a function of time
Counterflow
• 2+1 D Second order hydrodynamics (Israel-Stewart type equations)
• Flat metric.
• Transport properties - ABJM Plasma
• periodic bc
• Python/F2py (and Matlab)
Carrasco, Lehner, Myers (2012); Adams, Chesler, Liu (2013)
• Kolmogrov scaling; fractal-like structure of horizon
• Forced/Driven Turbulence?
driving happens on short length scales?
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 32Moving Ball
Trang 35Moving Ball
Temperature profile as a function of time
• Ideal hydro description is not good (steepening of waves)
• How do we determine shock width and shock standoff
distance?
gtt
• Metric source
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 36• Metric source
Trang 37Shock Tube
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 38Effects of Hall Viscosity
Trang 39Losing Forward
Momentum Holographically
based on KB, Christopher P Herzog arXiv:1312.4953
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 40Momentum Relaxation
• In most realistic systems, translation invariance
is broken by the presence of impurities
• In the absence of impurities the DC
Trang 41Linear Response Theory
• Memory Function Formalism (c.f Foster’s book)
• Momentum relaxation time
Trang 42Our Setup
• It is possible to break translation invariance by
introducing scalar perturbations, spatially dependent chemical potential (ionic lattice) or metric
perturbations
• In our setup we break translation invariance by
introducing metric perturbations.
• Relaxation time scale can be computed using the
gtt = (1 + e m/t cos(kx)), O(x) ⌘ Ttt
Trang 43⌧ =
2 2⌘k23✏0T0
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 44Relaxation Time
• At late time, the flow relaxes to the following
steady state solution:
• We can obtain an expression for the relaxation
rate at late times using linear perturbation theory around this steady state solution
T = pTg0
tt
, u = 0
p
Trang 45Relaxation Time
• For large k, we can use gauge/gravity correspondence
to obtain relaxation time scale
2.3k
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
equations for small .
wavenumber behavior (simple WKB approximation
is not good enough).
are measured in units where
T = 4⇡3
The markers show values obtained by solving the full nonlinear equations.
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 46Numerical Scheme
• Pseudospectral methods for discretizing spatial
derivatives.
• Runge-Kutta and Adams-Bashforth for time stepping.
• We have used the null characteristic formulation for
solving Einstein’s equations.
• In gravity, we need to solve 2 boundary evolution
equations, 2 bulk graviton evolution equations and one evolution equation at the apparent horizon.
• Number of propagating degrees of freedom is the
Trang 47Numerical Scheme
• Bondi-Sachs coordinates
• Einstein’s equations have a nested structure
• Gauge Choice: The location of apparent
Trang 510 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
k2 2t 8⇡Ti
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
k2 2t 8⇡Ti
6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Numerical Simulations
= 0.2, v = 0.2
• Gravity and hydro agree initially Gradient corrections
become important at late times.
• Reference line shows the linear response theory result
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 520.006 0.004 0.002 0.000 0.002
Ttx
0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.001
Ttt
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
k2 2t 8⇡T
0.003 0.002 0.001 0.000
Txx
Difference in Stress Tensor
Trang 530 1 2 3 4 5
k2 2t 8⇡Ti
5 4 3 2 1 0
Gravity vs Hydro
k = 20⇡
50 , = 0.2, v = 0.2
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 540.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
k2f ( )t 8⇡T0
1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
Trang 550.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
k2f ( )t 8⇡T0
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 5640 20 0 20 40 0.6
0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Trang 570 20 40 60 80 100
k2f ( )t 8⇡T0
10 8 6 4 2 0
result!!!
for large lattice strength at
Saturday, March 29, 14
Trang 58• Linear response theory seems to work for
small values of lattice strength
• For large lattice strengths, we can obtain
analytical results for small lattice wave numbers
• We need to use Numerical GR for all other
Trang 59Thank You
Saturday, March 29, 14