©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014 3 5.1 Competitive market Perfectly Competitive Markets Profit Maximization Competitive Firm Competitive Market Supply Curve Producer Surplus ©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2
Trang 1Market Structure
Chapter 5
By Tran Thi Kieu Minh, MSc
Microeconomics
Contents
Perfect Competitive Market
Monopoly
Monopolistic Competition
Obligopoly
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
2
The four types of market structure
Economists who study industrial organization divide markets into four types:
monopoly, oligopoly, monopolistic competition, and perfect competition
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
3
5.1 Competitive market
Perfectly Competitive Markets Profit Maximization Competitive Firm Competitive Market Supply Curve
Producer Surplus
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
4
Trang 25.1.1 Perfectly Competitive Markets
1. Price Taking
The individual firm sells a very small share of the total
market output and the individual consumer buys too small a
share of industry output, therefore, cannot influence market
price o have any impact on market price
Price taker
2. Product Homogeneity
The products of all firms are perfect substitutes
3. Free Entry and Exit
Buyers can easily switch from one supplier to another
Suppliers can easily enter or exit a market
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
5
E g.Total, average, & marginal revenue - competitive firm
Quantity (Q) Price (P) Total revenue (TR=P ˣ Q) Average revenue (AR=TR/Q) Marginal revenue (MR=ΔTR/ΔQ)
1 gallon
2
4
6
8
$6
6
6
6
6
$6
12
24
36
48
$6
6
6
6
6
$6
6
6
6
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
6
The Competitive Firm
D=AR=MR
$6
Output (gallons)
Price
$ per
gallon
100 200
D
$6
S
Price
$ per gallon
Output (millions
of gallons)
100
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
7
The Competitive Firm
Demand curve faced by an individual firm is a horizontal line at the market price P
Firm’s sales have no effect on market price
Average revenue = P
Marginal revenue = P
Profit Maximizing: For a perfectly competitive firm, profit maximizing output occurs when
( )
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
8
Trang 3P rofit maximization for a competitive firm
Costs
and
Revenue
At the quantity Q1, marginal revenue MR1 exceeds marginal cost MC1, so raising production
increases profit At the quantity Q2, marginal cost MC2 is above marginal revenue MR2, so
reducing production increases profit The profit-maximizing quantity QMAX is found where the
horizontal price line intersects the marginal-cost curve
Quantity
0
ATC
AVC P=AR=MR P=MR 1 =MR 2
MC
MC 1
MC 2
Q 2
Q 1 Q MAX
The firm maximizes profit
by producing the quantity
at which marginal cost
equals marginal revenue
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
9
Ma rginal cost as the competitive firm’s supply curve
Price
An increase in the price from P1 to P 2 leads to an increase in the firm’s profit-maximizing quantity from Q1 to Q2 Because the marginal-cost curve shows the quantity supplied by the firm at any given price, it is the firm’s supply curve
Quantity
0
ATC AVC
MC
P 1
P 2
Q 2
Q 1
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
10
5.1.2 Competitive Firm’s Decision
Shutdown
During a specific period of time
Because of current market conditions
Exit
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
11
Competitive Firm’s Decision
The firm’s short-run decision to shut down
The portion of its marginal-cost curve
That lies above average variable cost
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
12
Trang 4The competitive firm’s short-run supply curve
Costs
In the short run, the competitive firm’s supply curve is its marginal-cost curve (MC) above
average variable cost (AVC) If the price falls below average variable cost, the firm is
better off shutting down
Quantity
0
ATC
MC
AVC
1 In the short run, the firm produces on the
MC curve if P>AVC,
2 .but
shuts down
if P<AVC
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
13
Competitive Firm’s profit
Profit = TR – TC = (P – ATC) ˣ Q
Loss = TC - TR = (ATC – P) ˣ Q
= Negative profit
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
14
Profit as the area between price and average total cost
Price
Quantity
0
(a) A firm with profits
Profit
MC
ATC P=AR=MR P
Q
(profit-maximizing quantity)
ATC
Price
Quantity
0
(b) A firm with losses
Loss
MC
ATC
P=AR=MR P
Q (loss-minimizing quantity) ATC
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
15
Case study: Near-empty restaurants and off-season miniature golf
Restaurant – stay open for lunch?
Fixed costs
Not relevant
Are sunk costs in short run
Variable costs – relevant
Shut down if revenue from lunch < variable costs
Stay open if revenue from lunch > variable costs
Operator of a miniature-golf course
Ignore fixed costs
Stay open if revenue > variable costs
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
16
Trang 5Quiz1
A competitive Firm ABC has average production cost
($) of
a. What is the short-run supply curve of the firm?
b. If market price is $30, what is the optimum quantity
of the firm? How much is the maximum profit?
c. What is the firm’s decision if market price decreases
to $10? Explain
75 2
q
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
17
Competitive Market Supply Curve
Short run: market supply with a fixed number
of firms
For P > AVC: supply curve is MC curve
Add up quantity supplied by each firm
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
18
S h ort-run market supply
Price
In the short run, the number of firms in the market is fixed As a result, the market supply curve,
shown in panel (b), reflects the individual firms’ marginal-cost curves, shown in panel (a) Here,
in a market of 1,000 firms, the quantity of output supplied to the market is 1,000 times the
quantity supplied by each firm
Quantity (firm)
0
(a) Individual firm supply
MC
100
$2.00
Price
Quantity (market)
0 (b) Market supply
200
1.00
Supply
100,000
$2.00
200,000 1.00
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
19
Quiz 2
A competitive market of a good A has 1000 similar sellers, each has production cost of:
Market demand of good A is :
1. What is the market supply curve of good A?
2. What is the equilibrium price and quantity?
3. What is the optimum selling quantity of each seller?
2
1
2
20000 500
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
20
Trang 65.1.3 Producer Surplus
In the short-run:
Price is greater than MC on all but the last unit of output
Therefore, surplus is earned on all but the last unit
The producer surplus is the sum over all units produced
of the difference between the market price of the good
and the marginal cost of production
Area above supply to the market price
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
21
Producer Surplus for a Firm
Producer Surplus
Producer surplus
is area above MC
to the price
Price ($ per unit of output)
Output
AVC
MC
A
B
P
q *
At q * MC = MR
Between 0 and q ,
MR > MC for all units
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
22
Producer Surplus for a Firm
Producer surplus
is also ABCD = Revenue minus
variable costs
Price
($ per
unit of
output)
Output
Producer
Surplus
AVC
MC
A
B
P
q *
C
D
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
24
Producer Surplus for a Market
D
P *
Q *
Producer Surplus
Market producer surplus is
the difference between P*
and S from 0 to Q *
Price ($ per unit of output)
Output
S
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
25
Trang 75.2 Monopoly
Monopolist Demand and Marginal Revenue Profit maximization Market power Price discrimination Microeconomics
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
26
5.2.1 Monopolist
close substitutes
Monopoly resources
Government regulation
The production process
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
27
Why Monopolies Arise
Monopoly resources
A key resource required for production is owned by a single
firm
Higher price
Government regulation
Government gives a single firm the exclusive right to
produce some good or service
Government-created monopolies
Patent and copyright laws
Higher prices; Higher profits
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
28
Why Monopolies Arise
The production process
A single firm can produce output at a lower cost than can a larger number of producers
Natural monopoly
Arises because a single firm can supply a good or service to
an entire market at a smaller cost than could two or more firms
Economies of scale over the relevant range of output
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
29
Trang 8Demand and Revenue
A Monopolist’s Demand Curve
Price maker
Sole producer
Downward sloping demand
Market demand curve: P = f (Q)
A monopolist’s revenue
Total revenue: TR = Px Q = f (Q) x
Q
Average revenue: AR = TR/Q
Marginal revenue: MR = △TR/△Q
= TR’(Q)
Can be negative
Always: MR < P
MR curve – is below the demand
curve
Price
Q
0
Demand
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
30
MR
6.2.2 Profit maximization
Profit maximization
If MR > MC – increase production
If MC > MR – produce less
Maximize profit
Produce quantity where MR=MC
Intersection of the marginal-revenue curve and the marginal-cost curve
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
31
Profit maximization for a monopoly
Costs
and
Revenue
A monopoly maximizes profit by choosing the quantity at which marginal revenue equals
marginal cost (point A) It then uses the demand curve to find the price that will induce
consumers to buy that quantity (point B)
Quantity
0
Average total cost
Demand
Marginal revenue Marginal cost
Q MAX
B Monopoly
price
A
1 The intersection of the marginal-revenue curve and the marginal-cost curve determines the profit-maximizing quantity
2 and then the demand curve shows the
price consistent with this quantity
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
32
Profit maximization
Profit maximization
Price equals marginal cost
Price exceeds marginal cost
A monopoly’s profit
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
33
Trang 9The monopolist’s profit
5
Costs
and
Revenue
The area of the box BCDE equals the profit of the monopoly firm The height of the box
(BC) is price minus average total cost, which equals profit per unit sold The width of the
box (DC) is the number of units sold
Quantity
0
Demand Average
total
B E
D
Marginal revenue
Q MAX
Average total cost Marginal cost
Monopoly
price
C
Monopoly
profit
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
34
5.2.3 Market Power
A firm's market power: its ability to price above marginal cost
Lerner index, named after the American economist Abba Lerner (1903-1982), was formalized in 1934
higher numbers implying greater market power
For a perfectly competitive firm (where P=MC), L=0; such a firm has no market power
P MC P
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
35
6.2.4 The Welfare Cost of Monopolies
Monopoly
Produce quantity where MC = MR
Produces less than the socially efficient quantity of output
Charge P>MC
The deadweight loss:
Triangle between: demand curve and MC curve
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
36
The inefficiency of monopoly
8
Costs and Revenue
Because a monopoly charges a price above marginal cost, not all consumers who value the good at more than its cost buy it Thus, the quantity produced and sold by a monopoly is below the socially efficient level The deadweight loss is represented by the area of the triangle between the demand curve (which reflects the value
of the good to consumers) and the marginal-cost curve (which reflects the costs of the monopoly producer)
Quantity
0
Demand
Marginal revenue Monopoly
quantity
Marginal cost Monopoly
price
Efficient quantity
Deadweight loss
A
Q
Q
dQ MC P DWL
*
)
(
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
37
Trang 10The Welfare Cost of Monopolies
The monopoly’s profit: a social cost?
Monopoly
Higher profit
Not a reduction of economic welfare
Bigger producer surplus
Smaller consumer surplus
Monopoly profit
Not a social problem
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
38
Quiz 3
A monopolist has MC = 4 + Q and FC of $1000
He faces the demand of P = 160 – Q (P & C: $/kg, Q : kg)
1. What are the optimum quantity and price of the monopoly? How much is the maximum profit?
2. How much is the consumer surplus created by this monopoly?
3. How much is the DWL?
4. Government places a tax of $4/kg for the product of the monopoly How does profit change?
5. Graph the results
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
39
5.2.5 Price Discrimination
Price discrimination
different customers
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
40
Perfect First-Degree Price Discrimination
If the firm can perfectly price discriminate, each consumer
is charged exactly what they are willing to pay
Additional profit from producing and selling an incremental unit is now the difference between demand and marginal cost
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
41
Trang 11P*
Q*
Without price discrimination,
output is Q* and price is P*
Variable profit is the area
between the MC & MR (yellow)
Perfect First-Degree Price Discrimination
Quantity
$/Q
With perfect discrimination, firm will choose to produce Q**
increasing variable profits to include purple area
Consumer surplus is the area above P* and between
0 and Q* output
P max
D = AR
MR
MC
Q**
P C
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
42
First-Degree Price Discrimination
In practice perfect price discrimination is almost never possible
Firms can discriminate imperfectly
Can charge a few different prices based on some estimates
of reservation prices
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
43
First-Degree Price Discrimination
Examples of imperfect price discrimination
Lawyers, doctors, accountants
Car salesperson (15% profit margin)
Colleges and universities (differences in financial aid)
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
44
First-Degree Price Discrimination in Practice
Quantity
D
MR
MC
$/Q
P 2
P 3
P 1
P 5
P 6
Six prices exist resulting
in higher profits With a single price P* 4 , there are fewer consumers
P* 4
Q*
Discriminating up to
P 6 (competitive price) will increase profits
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
45
Trang 12Second-Degree Price Discrimination
In some markets, consumers purchase many units of a
good over time
Demand for that good declines with increased consumption
Electricity, water, heating fuel
Firms can engage in second degree price
discrimination
Practice of charging different prices per unit for different
quantities of the same good or service- Block pricing
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
46
Second-Degree Price Discrimination
= P 0 and Q = Q 0 With second-degree discrimination there are three blocks with prices
P 1 , P 2 , & P 3
Quantity
D
MR
MC
AC
P 0
Q 0
Q 1
P 1
1st Block
P 2
Q 2
2nd Block
P 3
Q 3
3rd Block
Different prices are charged for different quantities or
“blocks” of same good
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
47
Third-Degree Price Discrimination
Practice of dividing consumers into two or more
groups with separate demand curves and charging
different prices to each group
1 Divides the market into two-groups
2 Each group has its own demand function
Examples: airlines, premium v non-premium liquor,
discounts to students and senior citizens, frozen v canned
vegetables, magazines
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
48
Third-Degree Price Discrimination
How can the firm decide what to charge each group of consumers?
1 Total output should be divided between groups so that MR for each group are equal
2 Total output is chosen so that MR for each group of consumers is equal to the MC of production
©Kieu Minh, FTU, 2014
49