1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th by steven lay ch02d

12 152 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 12
Dung lượng 191,95 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Section 3.2 Ordered Fields... We have two operations, + and  , called addition and multiplication, such thatthe following properties apply: Commutative Property Associative Property Com

Trang 1

Chapter 3

The Real Numbers

Trang 2

Section 3.2 Ordered Fields

Trang 3

We have two operations, + and  , called addition and multiplication, such that

the following properties apply:

Commutative Property

Associative Property

Commutative Property

Associative Property

These 11 axioms are called the field axioms

The real numbers are an example of an ordered field

A1 For all x, y  , x + y  and if x = w and y = z, then x + y = w + z

A2 For all x, y  , x + y = y + x.

A3 For all x, y, z  , x + ( y + z) = (x + y) + z.

A4 There is a unique real number 0 such that x + 0 = x for all x 

A5 For each x  there is a unique real number  x such that x + ( x) = 0.

M1 For all x, y  , x  y  and if x = w and y = z, then x y = w z

M2 For all x, y  , x  y = y  x.

M3 For all x, y, z  , x  ( y  z) = (x  y)  z.

M4 There is a unique real number 1 such that 1  0 and x  1 = x for all x 

M5 For each x  with x  0, there is a unique real number 1/ x such that x  (1/ x) = 1.

DL For all x, y, z  , x  ( y + z) = (x  y) + (x  z)

Mult Identity Add Inverse

Mult Inverse Distributive Law

Additive Identity

Addition

Multiplication

Trang 4

In addition to the field axioms, the real numbers also satisfy four order axioms.

These axioms indentify the properties of the relation “<”

O1 For all x, y  , exactly one of the relations x = y, x > y, or x < y holds.

trichotomy law

Note: a > b means b < a.

O2 For all x, y, z  , if x < y and y < z, then x < z. transitive property

O3 For all x, y, z  , if x < y then x + z < y + z.

O4 For all x, y, z  , if x < y and z > 0, then x  z < y  z.

Let x, y, and z be real numbers.

(a) If x + z = y + z, then x = y (b) x  0 = 0.

(c) – 0 = 0 (d) (–1)  x = – x.

(e) x  y = 0 iff x = 0 or y = 0 (f) x < y iff – y < – x.

(g) If x < y and z < 0, then x  z > y  z.

Theorem 3.2.1

Our first theorem shows how the axioms may be used to derive some familiar algebraic properties

We illustrate the proofs by doing parts (a) and (d)

Trang 5

Let x, y and z be real numbers

(a) If x + z = y + z, then x = y.

If x + z = y + z, then (x + z) + (– z) = ( y + z) + (– z)

x + [z + (– z)] = y + [z + (– z)]

x + 0 = y + 0

by A5 ( add inverse )

and A1 ( addition )

by A3 ( assoc property )

by A5 ( add inverse )

x = y by A4 ( add identity )

Theorem 3.2.1

Proof:

Trang 6

Let x, y and z be real numbers

Theorem 3.2.1

(d) For any real x, (–1)x = – x.

Question: What is –1? Answer: –1 is the number which when added to 1 gives 0

Question: What is –x? Answer: – x is the number which when added to x gives 0.

Question: So how do we show that (–1)x = – x?

Answer: We show that (–1)x satisfies definition of – x

Namely, when (–1)x is added to x, the result is 0.

Proof:

We must show that x + (–1)x =

0

We have x + (–1)x = x + x  (–

1)

by M2 ( commutative )

= x  (1) + x  (–

1)

by M4 ( mult identity )

by DL ( distributive law )

by A5 ( add inverse )

= x  [1 + (–1)]

= x  0

by part (b)

= 0 Thus (–1)x = – x by the uniqueness of – x in A5 

Trang 7

For a more unusual example of an ordered field, let be the set of all rational functions.

Any mathematical system that satisfies these fifteen axioms is called an ordered field

But there are other examples as well The rational numbers are another example

The real numbers are an example of an ordered field

Example 3.2.6

That is, is the set of all quotients of polynomials A typical element of looks like

where the coefficients are real numbers and b k  0

Using the usual rules for adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing polynomials,

it is not difficult to verify that is a field

We can define an order on by saying that a quotient such as above is positive iff a n and b k have the same sign; that is, a nb k > 0

For example, since (3)(7) > 0

But since (4)(–7) < 0

,

n n k k

2 5

0,

x

 

 5

0,

 

Trang 8

If p/q and f/g are rational functions, then we say that

That is,

Practice 3.2.7*

Which is larger, We have

The verification that “>” satisfies the order axioms is Exercise 11

It turns out that the ordered field has a number of interesting properties,

as we shall see later

There is one more algebraic property of the real numbers to which we give special

attention because of its frequent use in proofs in analysis, and because it may not familiar

iff 0

qg qg

iff 0

2 2

3

or ?

7

x x

4 2

21

0

7

x x

 

2 2

3

7

x

x

Trang 9

Thus we suppose

that x > y and we must show that there exists an  > 0 such that x > y + 

Theorem 3.2.8

Let x, y  such that xy + for every  > 0 Then xy.

Proof: We shall establish the contrapositive

By axiom O1 (the trichotomy law), the negation of x  y is x > y.

Question: If x > y, what positive  can we add on to y so that x > y +  ?

We could take  equal to half the distance from x to y.

Let  = (x – y) /2 Since x > y,  > 0 Furthermore,

as required 

,

y  y       x

Trang 10

Recall the definition of absolute value from Section 1.4.

Definition 3.2.9

Let x, y  and let a > 0 Then

The basic properties of absolute value are summarized in the following theorem

Theorem 3.2.10

(a) |x|  0, (b) |x |  a iff  a  x  a,

(c) |x y| = |x|  |y|, (d) |x + y|  |x| + |y|

If x  , then the absolute value of x, denoted by | x|, is defined by

We will prove parts (b) and (d)

, if 0,

| |

, if 0

x



Trang 11

Let x, y  and let a > 0 Then

Proof:

Since x = | x | or x = |x|, it follows that |x |  x  | x|.If |x|  a, then we have

Conversely, suppose that a  x  a.If x  0, then | x | = x  a.

And if x < 0, then |x| = xa In both cases, |x|  a.

Let x, y  and let a > 0 Then

Proof:

As in part (b), we have

Adding the inequalities together, we obtain

which implies that |x + y|  |x| + |y| by part (b) 

| | | |

| |x x | | and | |x y y | | y

(| | | |)x y x y | | | |,x y

Trang 12

Part (d) of Theorem 3.2.10 is referred to as the triangle inequality:

| x + y |  | x | + | y |.

Its name comes from its being used with vectors in the plane, where |x| represents

the length of vector x.

x

y

x + y

It says that the length of one side of a triangle is less than or equal to the sum of the

lengths of the other two sides

Ngày đăng: 14/08/2017, 16:16