Math Myth:A Partnership for Student Success Dianne Siegfreid, Concurrent Enrollment, Weber State University, Utah Dixilee Blackinton, Developmental Math, Weber State University, Utah Lis
Trang 1Math Reality vs Math Myth:
A Partnership for Student Success
Dianne Siegfreid, Concurrent Enrollment, Weber State University, Utah Dixilee Blackinton, Developmental Math, Weber State University, Utah Lisa Jasumback, K-12 Math Supervisor, Davis School District, Utah
Trang 2The Salt Lake Tribune
August 18, 2004
Utah up on ACT scores
Overall results make educators
happy, but math still a struggle
Trang 3Fewer then half of
college-bound grads from 2004 will
do well in college math
courses.
“…math remains the toughest of
the ACT exams, reinforcing
revelations from another
measure: the Utah Basic Skills
Competency Test…”
Trang 4Weber State University
Trang 5Weber State University
• 39% Non-traditional Students
• 60% Students are full time
• 89% of students work at least 10
hrs per week
• 38% are married
Trang 6The University Viewpoint
• Student body has changed
• Student preparation has not kept
pace
• Most high school intermediate
algebra students land in college
developmental math
Trang 7The University Viewpoint continued
• Low passing rates in
Trang 8Math Placement
• Only 30% are eligible for college level math
• Less than ACT 23 score and COMPASS
Trang 9Prognosis of Earning a Degree
First Course Passed MC/QL Degree
Trang 10Davis School District
Demographics
• K-12 Public School System
• Suburban, just north of Salt Lake City
• Includes 9 Title 1 Elementary Schools
• 60,000 students currently, expected to
increase 20,000 in the next ten years
Trang 12Math Course Taking Patterns of Seniors
(2004) Who Were Enrolled in Algebra As
Trang 14Using the 6 th Grade CRT To
Trang 15Eighth Grade
8TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 8TH
Algebra Algebra Algebra Algebra Geometry Geometry Geometry Geometry
1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term
Trang 16Ninth Grade
9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH 9TH
Algebra Algebra Algebra Algebra Geometry Geometry Geometry Geometry Int Alg Int Alg Int Alg Int Alg.
1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term
A- B+ A
A-A A- A- A B+ B+ B+ C-
A A A C+ D+ C+ C+
A-A- A- A-
A-C+ C+ B- D+
A- A A B- B- C C
A-B C C A
C D- A D+
A- A- B+ B+
B C+ C A- A A- A
D-B- C+ B- D A- B B+ B B+ A- A- A-
Trang 17Tenth Grade
10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH 10TH
Geometry Geometry Geometry Geometry Int Alg Int Alg Int Alg Int Alg Precalc Precalc Precalc Precalc
1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 4th term
Trang 18Eleventh Grade
11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH
Int Alg Int Alg Int Alg Precalc Precalc Precalc Calc AB Calc AB Calc AB
1st term 2nd term 3rd term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term 1st term 2nd term 3rd term
Trang 19Differences Between High
Int Algebra in College Int Algebra H.S.
Required Out of Class Study Time
Minimal 2 Hours per Hour In
Trang 20Differences Between High
Non-Indicators
Demonstrated Achievement
Trang 21Typical Barrier to
Concurrent
Math
• Lack of Trust
development for teachers to enhance
student math readiness
Trang 22Typical Barrier to Concurrent
Math
• Need for High Standards
• Standards: require content,
exams, assignments and grading
scale to match college
Trang 23Typical Barrier to Concurrent Math
Additional Effort by College Faculty
Additional Effort: train teachers to
use collegiate grading scale and
require a grading portfolio review
Trang 24Solutions continued
• Limited contact with students
• Limited contact: sponsor visits by
collegiate faculty to concurrent
classes to meet and work with
students
Trang 25WSU-DSD Collegiate
Math Success Pilot Program
Trang 26how to teach for collegiate math success
• Select concurrent adjunct faculty
Trang 272004-05 continued
• Identify entry level collegiate math
classes for concurrent credit
• Provide information sessions with
parents and students regarding
collegiate math success factors
• Assess participant perception of efforts and teachers’ knowledge and skills
Trang 28• Reconsider K-12 course content and
sequencing of classes
• Incorporate collegiate developmental
math proficiencies into high school
classes
• Continue information sessions with
students and parents
Trang 292005-06 continued
• Implement Pilot Concurrent Math 1050
• Assess student performance and
compare with previous data
• Assess continuation of program and
implement accordingly
Trang 302005-06 Pilot Concurrent Math 1050
Year long class
• Use WSU exams
• Use WSU grade scale
• Assess student data
Trang 31• Conduct longitudinal studies on
concurrent students when sequencing
to higher level math or entry into WSU
or other post-secondary schools
• Continue implementation of program
and select additional sites
• Continue program assessment
Trang 32WSU Concurrent Enrollment
Program and DSD will provide funds and in-kind services to provide for
the implementation of the
professional development, program assessments and program
informational publications
Trang 33Lessons Learned
• Never assume nor blame your
program partners, instead,
converse and collaborate
• Be willing to challenge the status
Trang 34Lessons Learned continued
• Improve the match between
secondary and post-secondary
pedagogy and math rigor to better
meet the students’ needs
• Stop the Student Rush: Let
students have the time they need
to really learn their math basics
Trang 35Lessons Learned continued
• Persistence, Persistence,
Persistence
• Finding the right people for
partners
Trang 36Best of Luck to You
Thanks for the opportunity to share