1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Ebook General surgery prepare for the MRCS key articles from the surgery journal Part 2

406 1K 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 406
Dung lượng 44,59 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

(BQ) Part 2 book General surgery prepare for the MRCS key articles from the surgery journal presentation of content: Anatomy of the caecum, appendix and colon, anatomy of the rectum and anal canal, the pathology of colorectal polyps and cancers, chemotherapy andradiotherapy for colorectal cancers,... and other contents.

Trang 1

surgery Surgery also indicates recent advances that improve the understanding of disease and the safe and effective treatment of patients It comprises concise and systematically updated contributions that are produced over a three-year cycle Surgery is an excellent didactic tool to help consultant surgeons train their junior staff to become safe and competent surgeons.

Series editor

W E G Thomas MS FRCS FSACS(Hon) Consultant Surgeon, Honorary Senior Lecturer, Sheffield University, Member of Council and

past Vice President of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Clinical editor

Michael G Wyatt MSc MD FRCS FRCSEd (ad hom) Consultant Surgeon, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne; Honorary Reader, Newcastle

University; Clinical Editor, SURGERY; Honorary Secretary, The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, and Member of the Court

of Examiners for the Intercollegiate MRCS

Editorial adviser

Harold Ellis CBE DM FRCS FRCOG

Emeritus Professor of Surgery, London University

Clinical Anatomist, Guy’s, King’s and St Thomas’s

School of Biomedical Science, London, UK

Editorial Board

Jon Anderson FRCS (CTh)

Consultant Cardiothoracic Surgeon

Hammersmith Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK

Emily Jane Baird MBChB MRCS (Glasgow)

Trauma and Orthopaedic Specialty Registrar,

West of Scotland Rotation; and President of

the British Orthopaedic Trainees Association

Frank Carey FRCPath

Professor and Consultant Histopathologist

Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK

Christopher R Chapple MD FRCS(Urol) FEBU

Visiting Professor, Sheffield Hallam University

Consultant Urological Surgeon,

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, UK

Ben Cresswell MBChB FRCS (Gen Surg)

Consultant Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgeon

The Basingstoke Hepatobiliary Unit

North Hampshire Hospital, UK

Michael J Kelly MChir FRCS MRCP (UK)

Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, Leicester, UK and National

Advisor Colorectal Cancer, NHS Improvement Court of

Examiners RCSEng

Peter Lamb MBBS FRCS(Eng) MD FRCS (Gen)

Consultant Upper GI and General Surgeon

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK

Anthony Lander PhD DCH FRCS (Paed)

Senior Lecturer in Paediatric Surgery and Consultant

Paediatric Surgeon, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, UK

Mary Murphy MB BCh, BAO, FRCS (SN)

Consultant Senior Lecturer in SurgeryBristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UKHelen Sweetland MD FRCS (Ed)Reader in Surgery and Honorary Consultant SurgeonCardiff and Vale NHS Trust, UK

William Wallace MBChB(Hon) PhD FRCPE FRCPathConsultant Pathologist and Honorary Senior LecturerRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK

Robert Wilkins MA DPhil (Oxon)Lecturer in PhysiologyDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics

St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford, UKMark Wilkinson PhD FRCS (Orth)

Professor of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Sheffield, UKConsultant Orthopaedic SurgeonNorthern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Surgical and Clinical Anatomy for the MRCS exam

Series editors

Harold Ellis CBE DM MCh FRCS FRCOG LondonVishy Mahadevan MB BS PhD FRCS LondonThis series is available only on the website:

www.surgeryjournal.co.uk

Trang 2

Anorectal anomalies and Hirschsprung disease (including stomas)

Jonathan Sutcliffe Ian Sugarman Marc Levitt

646

TEST YOURSELFTest yourself: MCQ and extended

A great revision guide for the MRCS and beyond

Based entirely on the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum

Issue Editor

Anthony Lander frcs ( p aed )

Consultant Paediatric Surgeon

Birmingham Children’s Hospital,

Birmingham, UK

www.surgeryjournal.co.uk

ONLINE, IN PRINT, IN PRACTICE

Trang 3

Paediatric fluid and

electrolyte therapy

guidelines

Anthony Lander

Abstract

The advice in this article is based on a multidisciplinary consensus

opinion generated by the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists and

on a National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) recommendation of March

2007 entitled ‘Reducing the risk of hyponatraemia when administering

intravenous infusions to children’ To this has been added advice from

our specialist hospital fluid policy.

KeywordsHyponatraemia; intravenous fluids; paediatrics

The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) Alert of 2007 was

ex-pected to bring about a widespread change in postoperative

maintenance fluid administration such that children would receive

solutions containing 0.9% saline or Hartmann’s solution rather

than solutions containing 0.18% or 0.45% saline in glucose

Tele-phone surveys show that practice has changed such that 0.18%

saline has mostly been removed from wards but that the preferred

postoperative fluid is often 0.45% saline with 5% dextrose

The potential benefit of the recommendations is that the

chances of serious error from bad prescribing will be reduced

However, hypernatraemia or hyperchloraemia should be looked

for in those children having 0.9% saline or Hartmann’s solution

for protracted periods and instances reported appropriately

NPSA: The dangers of 4% glucose 0.18% saline

The NPSA reminded clinicians of the dangers of the use of

low-sodium-containing fluids such as 0.18% saline with 4% glucose

This fluid has always been inappropriate when used for

resuscita-tion or when used to replace most fluid and electrolyte deficits or

when given at excessive rates when maintenance fluids were

intended The risk is one of precipitating hyponatraemia which can

be fatal Sadly even in university and tertiary centres local audits

have shown that inappropriate prescriptions like this are not rare

Many surgeons have traditionally used 4% glucose with

0.18% saline as a maintenance fluid when given at appropriate

rates in well children based on their weight This or 0.45% saline

with 5% glucose has been traditionally given at reduced rates in

the postoperative period

The term isotonic is now to be considered in relation to the

tonicity of the electrolyte components of fluids Thus 0.18%

sa-line with 4% glucose and 0.45% sasa-line with 5% glucose are now

to be considered hypotonic since the glucose is ignored

Importantly the NPSA wanted all stocks of 4% glucose with0.18% saline removed from non-specialized areas and thisshould now have happened (Table 2)

Postoperative fluid prescriptionse new regulationsThe NPSA say that postoperative fluid prescriptions should neverinclude 4% glucose with 0.18% saline or 0.45% saline with 5%glucose and outside the neonatal period can only be chosen from:

 0.9% saline

 0.9% saline with 5% glucose

 Ringer’s lactate/Hartmann’s solution

 4.5% albumin

For neonates 10% glucose with 0.18% saline and 0.45% salinewith 5% glucose remain options

Prescribing intravenous (IV) fluids

IV fluids should be prescribed with the same care and attention

as given to other drugs No one prescribes analgesics when tibiotics are needed and no one should prescribe maintenancefluids when replacement fluids are intended

an-Fluids are given intravenously for the following four reasons:

 circulatory support in resuscitating vascular collapse

 replacement of previous fluid and electrolyte deficits

 maintenance

 replacement of ongoing losses

IV fluid prescriptionsPractice should be determined locally and ideally IV fluids should beprescribed daily by the team involved in the child’s care either at themorning round or in the early evening before handover

Fluids should not be being prescribed by the night team whowill not be as familiar with the patient unless the fluid man-agement requires fine-tuning in response to the clinical situation

or as a result of investigations Such a patient would then havehad a detailed and specific handover

PotassiumPotassium 20 mmol/litre (0.15%) (10 mmol in each 500-ml bag)should be included in maintenance fluids and in replacementfluids unless there are specific contraindications If there arespecial reasons not to give potassium these should be detailed inthe notes Potassium is not included in the first 24 hours of lifenor traditionally in the first 24 hours after surgery However, itwill be given if Hartmann’s solution is prescribed Rememberthat most potassium is intracellular and so a slightly lower serumlevel than normal may indicate marked potassium depletion.Monitoring

Monitoring of the patient’s weight is important and particularlyhelpful in managing rehydration Urine specific gravity is also agood guide to rehydration

Daily electrolytes are mandatory in those solely on IV fluidsfor more than a day The electrolytes should be looked at in thecontext of previous results and not simply in relation to thenormal values Typically when the serum sodium falls fluid re-striction is appropriate and when it rises fluid rates can beincreased This is particularly relevant in managing fluids in thepostoperative period A falling sodium is usually a sign of overadministration of fluid and not of giving too little sodium

Anthony Lander PhD FRCS (Paed) DCH is a Consultant Surgeon at

Bir-mingham Children’s Hospital, BirBir-mingham, UK Conflicts of interest:

none declared.

Trang 4

Circulatory support in shock

The following fluids are appropriate for bolus administration at

10 or 20 ml/kg given over periods of up to 20 minutes:

It is inappropriate to use low-sodium-containing fluids in these

situations 0.18% saline or 0.45% saline in glucose is not to be

used for circulatory resuscitation Hyponatraemia can result and

this can be fatal

Monitoring is typically based on the clinical response, blood

pressure, capillary refill, blood gasses, etc Serum electrolytes

should be checked in anyone needing circulatory resuscitation

Correcting previous fluid and electrolyte deficits

However estimated, previous losses are typically between 5 and

15% of body weight Sometimes the weight loss is accurately

known The fluid used to replace this deficit should be isotonic

0.9% sodium chloride or Ringer’s lactate/Hartmann’s solution

A 15-kg child who is 5% dehydrated has a water deficit of 750 ml

Audits have shown that it is not an uncommon misconception that

10% dehydration can be corrected by increasing maintenance fluid

rates by 10%! This is clearly incorrect

Hypovolaemia, should be corrected with an initial fluid bolus

of 10e20 ml/kg of an isotonic fluid or colloid, repeated as

necessary followed by a slower correction of residual tion with an isotonic fluid, taking into account ongoing losses,serum electrolytes and urine output

dehydra-Maintenance fluid requirements in childrenMaintenance fluid requirements are still to be calculatedaccording to the recommendations of Holliday and Segar(Table 1) Table 1is a starting point only and the individualchild’s response to fluid therapy should always be monitored andappropriate adjustments made

In children outside the neonatal period 0.45% saline in glucose

or Hartmann’s solution or 0.9% saline are options supported by theNPSA However, in the postoperative period it recommends notusing 0.45% saline These fluids give more than the daily re-quirements of sodium, but the risks of this are considered to be lessthan the risks of hyponatraemia if 0.18% saline is administered Ourpreferred fluid is Hartmann’s solution since this gives less chloride

In term neonates during the first 48 hours of life 10% glucoseshould be given at a rate of 60 ml/kg/day unless there is aclinical indication for increased or decreased fluid administra-tion Sodium would be added to IV fluids on day 2e3 depending

on renal function, serum sodium and weight

From day 3 of life maintenance fluid should be 0.18% saline with10% glucose given at a rate of 4 ml/kg/hour or 100e120 ml/kg/day.Preterm babies or those under 2 kg may require higher rates ofadministration and should be assessed at least daily by assess-ment of weight and electrolytes

Normal water, electrolyte, energy and protein requirements

Table 1

Commonly available crystalloid fluids

(mmol/litre) (mmol/litre) (mmol/litre) (kcal/litre)

Trang 5

Maintenance fluid requirements may need to be increased in

children with pyrexia, excess sweating, hypermetabolic states

such as burns or when radiant heaters or phototherapy is used

There is no consensus on whether maintenance fluid

re-quirements should be reduced in children on a paediatric intensive

care unit (PICU) who are sedated and ventilated with humidified

gases

Simple calculations will show that the electrolyte

re-quirements are met if 0.18% NaCl, 0.15% KCl is administered at

the prescribed rates But the dangers of hyponatraemia are

considered to outweigh the benefits of restricting the sodium and

chloride content of the fluid

Fluids given during operations

 During surgery the majority of children may be given fluids

without glucose Blood glucose should be monitored

Maintenance fluid used during surgery should be isotonic

such as 0.9% sodium chloride or Ringer’s

lactate/Hart-mann’s solution

 Neonates in the first 48 hours of life should be given

glucose during surgery

 Preterm and term infants already receiving

glucose-cont-aining solutions should continue with them during surgery

 Infants and children on parenteral nutrition preoperatively

should continue to receive parenteral nutrition during

surgery or change to a glucose-containing maintenance

fluid and blood glucose monitored

 Children of low body weight (less than third centile) or

having prolonged surgery should receive a

glucose-containing maintenance fluid (1e2.5% glucose) or have

their blood glucose monitored during surgery

 Children having extensive regional anaesthesia with a

reduced stress response should receive a

glucose-containing maintenance fluid (1e2.5% glucose) or have

their blood glucose monitored

 All losses during surgery should be replaced with an

isotonic fluid such as 0.9% sodium chloride, Ringer’s

lactate/Hartmann’s solution, a colloid or blood, depending

on the child’s haematocrit

 In children over 3 months of age the haematocrit may be

allowed to fall to 25% Children with cyanotic congenital

heart disease may need a higher haematocrit to maintain

oxygenation

Postoperative fluid management

Some preoperative surgical conditions are associated with

increased antidiuretic hormone (ADH) production: empyema,

sepsis, shock, etc Operative trauma, pain, nausea and vomiting

also contribute to ADH release

The NPSA alert has recommended that 0.18% and 0.45% saline

in glucose should not be used for postoperative maintenance as

they may cause hyponatraemia due to retention of free water

released after metabolism of glucose from the solution

It recommends that the following fluids alone should be prescribed:

Ongoing losses from drains or nasogastric tubes should bereplaced with an isotonic fluid such as 0.9% sodium chloride

It is possible that this change in practice may lead to high serumchlorides and these should be monitored Hyperchloraemia cangive rise to headaches, but it is less dangerous than hyponatraemia.Oral fluids should be started and increased after surgery whilst

IV fluids are reduced and then discontinued The rate at whichthis happens depends upon the child and the surgery

Monitoring of fluid therapy

 Serum electrolytes do not need to be measured in all operatively healthy children prior to elective surgerywhere IV fluids are to be given for the duration of surgeryand for a short period thereafter

pre- If there has been bowel preparation or there is unshuntedhydrocephalus, electrolytes should be checked preoperatively

 Serum electrolytes need to be measured preoperatively inall children presenting for elective or emergency surgerywho require IV fluid to be administered prior to surgery

 Children should be weighed prior to fluids being prescribed

 Serum electrolytes should be measured every 24 hours inall children on IV fluids or more frequently if abnormal

 Children should be weighed daily while on IV fluids unlessthis is difficult

 A fluid input/output chart must be carefully maintainedand checked by the prescribing doctor

Common electrolyte derangementsHyponatraemia

 Hyponatraemia (serum Na <135 mmol/litre) may occur in

a number of situations, but is commonly seen wheninappropriate fluids have been administered or followingsurgery with any fluid regime

 Low-sodium-containing (0.18% NaCl) (hypotonic) tenance fluids are more likely to precipitate hyponatraemia

main-if fluids rates are inappropriately high

 Presenting features of hyponatraemia include seizures orrespiratory arrest Headache is a consistent early sign ofhyponatraemia in adults, but is rarely reported in children

 Hyponatraemic encephalopathy should be managed as amedical emergency on PICU

 Hyponatraemic seizures respond poorly to anticonvulsantsand initial management is to give an infusion of 3% sodiumchloride solution One ml/kg of 3% sodium chloride willnormally raise the serum sodium by 1 mmol/litre Serum Nashould be raised quickly until the child has regained con-sciousness and has stopped fitting or the serum Na is above

125 mmol/litre The amount of Na required can be calculatedaccording to the following formula:

mmol of Na required¼ ð130  present serum NaÞ  0:6

Trang 6

 Asymptomatic hyponatraemia does not require active

correction with 3% sodium chloride solution The dehydrated

child may be treated with enteral fluids or if not tolerated, with

IV 0.9% sodium chloride solution

 The child with asymptomatic hyponatraemia and normal or

increased volume status, if taking oral fluids should be

vol-ume restricted or if on IV fluids should have fluid

adminis-tered at 50% of maintenance rate If eating, salt can be added

to the food

Hypernatraemia

 Hypernatraemia (serum Na >150 mmol/litre) commonly

oc-curs as a result of excessive water loss, restricted water intake

or an inability to respond to thirst It may also occur in infants

given incorrectly made feeds Hypernatraemia can be fatal

 Signs of hypernatraemia are more severe when it develops

rapidly or when the serum Na is greater than 160 mmol/

litre Chronic hypernatraemia is often well tolerated

because of cerebral compensation

 The true degree of dehydration is often underestimated if

clinical signs alone are used compared to loss of weight

Intravascular volume is often well preserved during the initial

stages

 The management of hypernatraemic dehydration consists

of initial volume replacement with 0.9% sodium chloride

given in boluses of 20 ml/kg to restore normovolaemia

 Complete correction should then be done very slowly over

at least 48 hours to prevent cerebral oedema, seizures and

brain injury The serum Na should be corrected at a

reduction of no more than 12 mmol/litre/day with 0.45%

sodium chloride or 0.9% sodium chloride in glucose

 In hypernatraemic dehydration it is important to give

maintenance fluid alongside fluid to correct dehydration

Potassium imbalance

 Hypokalaemia (serum K <3.5 mmol/litre) produces

contractility and paralytic ileus If possible oral

supple-ments of 3e5 mmol/kg/day should be given Orange juice

and bananas are rich in potassium

 In severe hypokalaemia (serum K <3 mmol/litre), IV

correction should be no faster than 0.25 mmol/kg/hour

using a maximum peripheral concentration of 40 mmol/

litre KCl (as per British National Formulary for Children)

For a more rapid correction, the patient should be in PICU

and the infusion administered via a central line

 Hyperkalaemia (serum K >5.5 mmol/litre) causes skeletal

muscle weakness and electrocardiography (ECG) changes

when serum K is greater than 7 mmol/litre

 Immediate treatment of hyperkalaemia is to antagonize

membrane effects by giving 100 mg/kg of 10% calcium

gluconate This equates to 0.5 ml/kg of a 10% solution (1

ml 10% calcium gluconate contains 0.22 mmol calcium)

Advanced Paediatric Life Support (APLS) recommendation)

 Alongside this it is important to increase intracellular shift

bicar-bonate, an infusion of 0.3e0.5 g/kg/hour of glucose with 1

unit of insulin for every 5 g of glucose or to give 2.5e5 mg

nebulized salbutamol (5 mg/kg in neonates IV)

 Removal of potassium from the body can be achieved bygiving 1 g/kg calcium resonium rectally or orally, by use offurosemide 1 mg/kg or by dialysis or haemofiltration.Calcium imbalance

 Hypocalcaemia (corrected total Ca <2 mmol/litre or

<1.5 mmol/litre in neonates) may produce symptoms oftwitching and jitteriness, perioral, finger and toe paraes-thesia, masseter and carpopedal spasm, prolonged QT in-terval and reduced cardiac contractility

 Immediate treatment is with 10% calcium gluconate 0.5ml/kg to a maximum of 20 ml over 10 minutes or 10%calcium gluconate 0.2 ml/kg to a maximum of 10 ml over

10 minutes Warning: there is a danger of extravasationcausing tissue injury

 The central venous route should be considered for tion with continuous ECG monitoring during injection

injec- Calcium levels appear low in the newborn because of lowalbumin levels There is a normal physiological fall in cal-cium concentration after birth which rises after the secondday Causes of hypocalcaemia in the newborn are encepha-lopathy, renal failure, Di George syndrome, disorderedmaternal metabolism or maternal diabetes mellitus.Pyloric stenosis: hypochloraemia correction

Children with pyloric stenosis typically present with a mildhypochloraemic alkalotic dehydration Resuscitation can bebased on the serum chloride in most children

Calculate the chloride deficit and replace over 12e48 hoursdepending on severity

Chloride deficit¼ 2=3  weight ðkgÞ  110 Cl

:Use 0.9% saline 0.15% Kþ(170 mmol Cl/litre) or 0.45% saline,5% glucose 0.15% Kþ(95 mmol Cl/litre)

SummaryGreat care and respect should be given to IV fluid management It

is important to understand the basic science, the risks and nowthe national guidelines which have been outlined here and

Example: a 3.3-kg child is mildly dehydrated with a ClLof

If the serum chloride is then remeasured and the bicarbonate checked, they will most likely be corrected.

When corrected use appropriate maintenance fluids, but continue

to replace nasogastric losses with 0.9% saline 0.15% KD.

Trang 7

This is a review of the pathology of the major solid extracranial neoplasms

of childhood that may be encountered in paediatric surgical practice It

does not include the various leukaemias, lymphomas and

reticuloendothe-lial neoplasms that make up a large proportion of childhood malignancy.

The rarity of childhood tumours and common overlapping histological

fea-tures may make the diagnosis particularly challenging A variety of

histo-pathological parameters may be used to give prognostic information

including degree of tumour differentiation, presence or absence of

anaplasia, extent of necrosis and mitotic index Important genetic

aberra-tions of both prognostic and diagnostic significance are also discussed.

Increasingly the management of these tumours requires a multidisciplinary

approach with close collaboration between the surgical team, pathologist

and molecular scientist.

KeywordsChildhood; genetics; pathology; tumour

Neuroblastoma

Neuroblastoma is the most common solid extracranial neoplasm

in children (1 in 10,000 live births per year in the UK) accounting

internationally for 6e10% of all childhood malignancies It is a

nervous system tumour, derived from cells of the neural crest

which give rise to the sympathetic nervous system, and occurs

predominantly in those aged under 5 years It usually arises in

the retroperitoneum (50% originating in the adrenal glands), but

may occur anywhere along the line of the sympathetic chain

Clinical presentation depends upon tumour location, age and

associated clinical symptoms, which may include weight loss,

fever, gastrointestinal tract disturbances, and anaemia (as well as

symptoms related to tumour expansion) Neuroblastoma is often

widely disseminated at the time of diagnosis, with 70e80% of

patients aged more than 1 year presenting with metastatic

dis-ease, usually to lymph nodes, liver skin, bone or bone marrow

Histology (Figure 1): neuroblastomas are composed of dense

sheets of small, round, blue cells traversed by fine fibrovascular

septa Homer-Wright pseudorosettes are observed in 15e50% of

tumour samples and consist of neuroblasts with eosinophilic

neuritic processes that polarize towards a central point Theseneuritic processes (also called neuropils) are a pathognomonicfeature of neuroblastoma Necrosis and calcification (often in a

‘chicken wire’ fashion around individual cells) are usual ings Positive immunohistochemistry for neural markers (forexample S100, neuron-specific enolase) may help differentiateneuroblastomas from other small, round blue-cell tumours (forexample Ewing’s/primitive neuroectodermal tumours, rhabdo-myosarcoma) Electron microscopy may show ultrastructuralfeatures (for example neurofilaments, neurotubules, synapticvesicles, dense core granules) confirming the neural nature of thetumour

find-Various histological grading systems designed to give nostic information are in use They grade tumour characteristics,

prog-in particular the percentage of differentiated elements, mitoticcount and karyorrhectic index Neoplasms containing matureganglion cells as well as immature neuroblasts are termed ‘gan-glioneuroblastomas’ and tend to have a better prognosis thanneuroblastomas Ganglioneuroma, which is more common inadults, is benign and consists of abnormal (but mature)gangliocytes

Molecular genetics may show a wide variety of chromosomalimbalances, including hyperdiploidy for whole chromosomes,deletions of chromosome arms 1p and 11q (regions which maycontain tumour suppressor genes) and, most commonly, gains ofchromosome arm 17q Amplification of the MYCN proto-oncogene occurs in about 25% of cases

Management: different treatments are required for differentstages of disease The age at diagnosis (prognosis is better forthose aged <1 year) and the other prognostic variables listedabove must be considered The International NeuroblastomaRisk Group Task Force has identified the following factors to behighly statistically significant in providing pre-treatment riskstratification: stage, age, histologic category, grade of tumourdifferentiation, status of the MYCN oncogene (amplification is anadverse prognostic feature), chromosome 11q status and DNAploidy Neuroblastomas may be managed by surgery and radio-therapy; chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation may berequired for higher-stage disease This is an aggressive neoplasmand less than 50% of cases are cured

Wilms’ tumour (malignant nephroblastoma)

In the UK, Wilms’ tumour accounts for about 95% of renal lignancies in childhood and 5% of all childhood malignancies.Most patients present with an abdominal mass (noted by theparents) between the ages of 1 year and 3 years Rarely it pre-sents with pain, haematuria, hypertension or even rupture.Sporadic cases of Wilms’ tumour have been reported in adultsand a rare extra-renal variant exists Prognosis is related to thestage of the disease at diagnosis, histological features, age (morefavourable for those aged<2 years) and tumour size Metastaticspread is typically to the lungs

ma-Histology: the classic triphasic Wilms’ tumour consists of threecell types: epithelial, blastemal and stromal (Figure 2) All

Lesley Christie FRCPath is a Consultant Histopathologist at Ninewells

Hospital and Medical School, Dundee Conflicts of interest none

declared.

Steve Lang FRCPath is a Consultant Histopathologist at Ninewells

Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK Conflicts of interest: none

declared.

Trang 8

components are represented to varying degrees in most tumours,

but monophasic or biphasic types occur

Undifferentiated blastema is extremely cellular, composed

of small round or oval primitive cells containing small amounts

of cytoplasm Typically, these cells grow in sheets, nodules or

cords Mesenchymal stroma consists of spindle cells which may

differentiate along various cell lines, particularly skeletal and

smooth muscle Epithelial tissue comprises embryonic tubular

and glomerular elements Other cell types including squamous,

transitional, neural, cartilage and adipose tissue may be seen

The presence or absence of anaplasia (large, hyperchromatic

nuclei, abnormal mitosis) designates the tumour as having

unfavourable or favourable histology, respectively

Genetics: Wilms’ tumour develops in otherwise healthy children,

but less than 10% of tumours occur in individuals with

eDrash and Wilms’ tumour, aniridia, genitourinary ities, mental retardation (WAGR syndrome) Hereditary or spo-radic Wilms’ tumour may result from specific germlinemutations in the Wilms’ tumour gene (WT1) located on the shortarm of chromosome 11 and may also be associated with a variety

abnormal-of genitourinary abnormalities Loss abnormal-of heterozygosity for mosomes 1p and 16q appears to be an adverse prognostic indi-cator even in cases with favourable histology

chro-Management: the overall cure rate of Wilms’ tumour in the UKhas risen dramatically to about 80% due to improvements insurgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy Stage I and Stage IItumours without anaplasia (favourable histology) are managedwith nephrectomy and chemotherapy Additional chemothera-peutic agents and radiotherapy are employed for higher stage andanaplastic tumours (unfavourable histology) Treatment hasbeen standardized following the publication of the NationalWilms’ Tumour Study

Other malignant renal tumours in children with a poorerprognosis than that of Wilms’ tumour include:

 clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (also called bone stasising renal tumour of childhood), accounting foraround 5% of paediatric renal neoplasms

meta- malignant rhabdoid tumour of the kidney (the mostaggressive tumour in this group, accounting for around 2%

as well as bilaterality, the tumour may also be present in thepineal gland or suprasellar/parasellar regions (trilateral retino-blastoma) Retinoblastomas are often quite large at presentationand are characteristically identified by the presence of a whitepupillary reflex Spread may occur to the optic nerve and brain

by direct extension or through the arachnoid space; distantspread is commonly to the skeleton

Histology: retinoblastoma is typically composed of sheets ofsmall, round, hyperchromatic blue cells although a trabecular ornested pattern of growth may be present A characteristic feature(not always seen) is evidence of retinal differentiation in the form

of FlexnereWintersteiner rosettes Extensive areas of coagulativenecrosis may be evident as the rapidly growing tumour outstripsits vascular supply A rare benign variant exists in which thetumour is composed of mature cells (retinocytoma)

Genetics: retinoblastoma arises due to inactivation of the noblastoma gene (RB1) located on chromosome 13 Both allelesmust be mutated for this to occur e a classic example of theKnudson ‘two-hit’ hypothesis The first hit may be a germlinemutation in which every cell of the body has one mutant allele;

reti-Figure 1 Neuroblastoma (a) Fibrillary background; (b) undifferentiated

cells.

Figure 2 Triphasic Wilms’ tumour (a) Blastemal element; (b) epithelial

element; c, stromal element.

Trang 9

the second hit represents a somatic mutation The germline

mutation may be transmitted as a dominant trait from a parent,

or, as in most retinoblastoma cases, represents a new mutation

Children with an inherited mutant retinoblastoma gene are at

greatly increased risk of other malignancies, particularly

osteo-sarcoma All bilateral retinoblastomas and a proportion of

uni-lateral cases (15% of cases in the UK) arise in children who carry

the mutant gene

Management aims to preserve as much sight as possible, and

may include laser photocoagulation and local radiotherapy

Enucleation is performed if the tumour is extensive Systemic

chemotherapy may be employed if the surgical margin of the

optic nerve is involved by tumour or there is evidence of

extension into the brain or metastatic spread Long-term survival

for retinoblastoma is about 95% in the UK

Hepatoblastoma

Hepatoblastoma is the most common malignant liver tumour in

children However, it is rare even among the other solid

malig-nancies, with about one child per million per year developing the

disease in the UK Unlike hepatocellular carcinoma, there is

no association with cirrhosis The typical presentation is an

asymptomatic abdominal mass noted by the parents in a child

aged under 3 years Sporadic cases occur in older children,

teenagers and adults; 10e20% of children have metastases at

presentation, with the lung being the predominant site Serum

concentrations of alpha-fetoprotein are often elevated The

location of the tumour within the liver, its size and extent of

spread are usually determined by computed tomography (CT)

and hepatic angiography

Wiedemann syndrome, and those with familial adenomatous

polyposis are at about 500 times greater risk of developing the

disease

Histology: hepatoblastoma may be composed entirely of

epithelial elements (50%) or a combination of epithelium and

mesenchyme The most common epithelial subtype is the pure

fetal form, in which the cells resemble hepatocytes and grow in a

pattern mimicking fetal liver Foci of extramedullary

haemato-poiesis may be seen The embryonal form is composed of cells

which appear less mature and has a predominantly solid growth

pattern The small cell undifferentiated hepatoblastoma is

composed of sheets of undifferentiated anaplastic small cells and

has the poorest prognosis If stromal elements are present (mixed

tumours), they may be undifferentiated or consist of bone and/or

cartilage

Genetics: there has been limited study of their cytogenetics due

to the rarity of these tumours The most common findings are

trisomies of 2, 8 and 20 and rearrangements of 1q Aneuploidy

may be associated with a poorer prognosis

Management of hepatoblastoma is surgical resection

Cytore-ductive chemotherapy may be used in order to allow removal of

a previously unresectable tumour The prognosis of patients who

have had complete surgical removal with no evidence of residual

disease is excellent; the outlook for those who have residualdisease (despite aggressive chemotherapy) is poor A transplantmay be considered in tumours that involve the whole liver.Concentrations of a-fetoprotein may be used to determineresponse to therapy and to detect recurrence

RhabdomyosarcomaRhabdomyosarcoma is a highly malignant tumour that arisesfrom the primitive skeletal muscle cell (rhabdomyoblast) andaccounts for over 50% of soft-tissue tumours in children in the

UK There are three main subtypes of rhabdomyosarcoma;embryonal, alveolar and pleomorphic; the latter is extremely rare

in children and is not discussed further The tumours may arise

as part of a familial syndrome, but the vast majority are sporadic

 Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma occurs predominantly inchildren aged less than 5 years, but may occur in adoles-cents and very rarely in adults It usually arises in the headand neck region, as well as the biliary and urogenitaltracts Macroscopically, it appears poorly circumscribed,white and soft If the tumour grows just beneath a mucosalmembrane (for example vagina, bladder) it may form apolypoidal mass resembling a bunch of grapes and isfurther then termed a ‘botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma’.Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma is composed of sheets ofspindle shaped cells (rhabdomyoblasts) The identification

of cross-striations on light microscopy is useful (but notessential) for the diagnosis There is a characteristic vari-ability in cellularity within the tumour, the less cellularareas containing abundant mucoid material

 Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is seen in older children andyoung adults and usually occurs in the extremities andperineal region The tumour consists of nests of round oroval cells separated by fibrous septa (Figure 3) Centrally,the cells become detached, leaving spaces A solid variety

of the alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma exists in which the cellnests are cohesive, a feature which may cause some

Figure 3 Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (a) Rhabdomyoblasts; (b) fibrous septae covered by a lining of single cells; (c) discohesive cells.

Trang 10

diagnostic difficulties The alveolar subtype has a poorer

prognosis than the embryonal variant

Immunohistochemistry: the skeletal muscle origin of the

tumour must be established in order to make a diagnosis of

rhabdomyosarcoma A wide panel of immunohistochemistry

may be employed, with the most useful stains including

posi-tivity for myogenin, myo D1, desmin and muscle-specific actin

Genetics: alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas characteristically have

the translocation t(2;13) which results in PAX3-FKHR fusion or

t(1;13) resulting in PAX7-FKHR fusion In those patients with

metastatic disease, tumours expressing PAX3-FKHR appear to

have a poorer prognosis The embryonal variant has no specific

cytogenetic features

Ewing’s sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumour

Ewing’s sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumours are a

family of tumours with similar cell lineage and genetic

aberra-tions These tumours were previously considered separate

en-tities, but were grouped together following the discovery that

they contained identical reciprocal translocations The cell of

origin is thought to be derived from the neural crest Ewing’s

tumour is a primary sarcoma of bone lying at the most

undif-ferentiated end of the spectrum The peripheral neuroectodermal

tumours arise in soft tissues and show evidence of primitive

neuronal differentiation The presence or absence of neural

fea-tures has no prognostic significance

The tumours arise predominantly in children and young

adults, accounting for 4% of adult and childhood malignancies

There is a predilection for males Ewing’s sarcoma usually occurs

in the medullary canal of the long bones and may present with

pain, fever and a raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate;

sug-gesting an initial diagnosis of osteomyelitis Peripheral

neuro-ectodermal tumours commonly arise in the chest, abdomen,

pelvis and extremities The prognosis depends on the stage of the

disease at presentation, and the location and size of tumour

About 20% will present with metastases, with spread occurring

primarily to the lungs, pleura, other bones and bone marrow

Involvement of lymph nodes may occur, which is rare in a

sar-coma The diagnosis is made using the combination of clinical

information, radiology, histology with immunohistochemistry

and cytogenetics

Histology: the tumour comprises small round cells arranged in

sheets separated by strands of fibrous tissue Necrosis and

hae-morrhage are common and may be striking Peripheral

neuro-ectodermal tumour cells may arrange themselves around blood

vessels to form pseudorosettes and, occasionally, true

Homer-Wright rosettes are present (in keeping with neuronal

differen-tiation) Immunohistochemistry for vimentin and the cell

mem-brane protein CD99 is positive in almost all cases; neural markers

may also be expressed

Genetics: the most common cytological abnormality shared by

these tumours is the t(11;22)(q24;q12) translocation, which

re-sults in fusion of the Ewing’s sarcoma gene with the FLI-1 gene

This translocation is found in over 95% of cases in the UK

Management is a combination of surgery, radiotherapy andmulti-drug chemotherapy The 5-year survival is about 75% forpatients with localized disease

OsteosarcomaOsteosarcoma is the most common primary malignancy of bone

in children; there are under 100 new cases in the UK each year.The cell of origin is the bone-forming cell, the osteoblast Thistumour usually arises in the metaphyses of the long bones,particularly around the knee or involving the proximal humerus.Most occur sporadically, but others may be associated withinherited disorders such as the LieFraumeni syndrome; childrenwho have hereditary retinoblastoma are also at increased risk It

is more common in adolescent boys than girls, with most mours arising in the second decade It may occur following boneirradiation for other malignancies (secondary osteosarcoma) and

tu-is associated with Paget’s dtu-isease of bone in adults Typicallyosteosarcoma presents with severe, worsening bone pain with orwithout local swelling The patient may present with a patho-logical fracture Radiological appearances vary, but the usualfinding is that of a lytic and blastic lesion with destruction ofcortical bone and extension of the tumour into soft tissues Thefull extent of disease is carefully assessed by CT or magneticresonance imaging before surgery as limb-sparing techniques arebecoming routine in the UK

The tumour is sampled extensively in order to determine theimpact of preoperative chemotherapy; the extent of tumour ne-crosis is presented as a percentage and provides importantprognostic information

Histology: osteosarcoma is an aggressive tumour that usuallyshows marked pleomorphism and nuclear anaplasia The cellularmorphology may vary considerably, consisting of small cells,spindle cells, giant cells, epitheliod cells or a combination oftypes Central to the diagnosis of osteosarcoma is the identifi-cation of malignant osteoid: an amorphous, pink, extracellulardeposit (Figure 4) The amount of osteoid and the pattern in

Figure 4 Osteosarcoma (a) malignant osteoid; (b) malignant osteoblasts.

Trang 11

which it is laid down vary considerably and, in cases where it is

sparse, its identification may be extremely difficult Varying

amounts of cartilage and fibrous tissue may also be present The

conventional osteosarcoma may be subdivided according to the

predominant matrix into:

 osteoblastic osteosarcoma

 chondroblastic osteosarcoma

 fibroblastic osteosarcoma

Genetics: no single translocation or chromosomal aberration is

consistently seen in osteosarcoma Chromosomal gains are

common and a number of genes are reportedly amplified (forexample CDK4, MDM2, SAS )

Management depends on the size, location and grade of thetumour Pulmonary metastases are common at the time of pre-sentation and, even in those with apparently localized disease, thepresence of microscopic metastases is highly likely Surgicalmanagement may involve local resection (limb-sparing surgery) oramputation Chemotherapy is given pre- and sometimes post-operatively; radiotherapy may also be employed in some cases.About 50% of those with osteosarcoma are cured in the UK A

Trang 12

Abdominal pain in children is common and sometimes results from

serious pathology amenable to surgical intervention Though the true

cause of many symptoms is not always determinable a diagnostic label

is often assigned The final diagnosis for many children is ‘non-specific

abdominal pain’ e an ill-understood group of conditions Acute

appendi-citis is common in children and can be life threatening; the history is short

in the majority and the diagnosis can be obvious, but when the diagnosis

is in doubt, active observation and judicious investigation are

appro-priate For children in whom appendicitis is strongly suspected, surgery

is the standard treatment though the child with an appendix mass may

be managed conservatively Adequate resuscitation and preoperative

broad-spectrum antibiotics are important for successful outcomes.

Appendicectomy can be carried out open or laparoscopically

Laparo-scopic appendicectomy is the intervention of choice where facilities and

expertise are available Operating late at night is not recommended

Com-plications of the disease include rupture with localized or generalized

peritonitis leading to intra-abdominal and pelvic abscesses, and wound

infections Rarely there may be an iatrogenic injury to the bowel or an

ap-pendix stump rupture resulting in a faecal fistula While acute

appendi-citis remains a cause of morbidity and occasionally mortality, with

timely presentation the majority of children have a good outcome.

Keywords Acute appendicitis; appendicectomy; appendix abscess;

children; laparoscopy

Children with abdominal pain account for a high proportion of all

paediatric and paediatric general surgery admissions A wide

variety of underlying diagnoses, organic and functional, may be

causative and should be kept in mind in the assessment of each

child A stepwise approach ensures that investigations and

in-terventions are appropriate, timely and effective Clinicians

should remember that a significant number of children

present-ing for an opinion will have non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP);

ultimately no cause will be found for their symptoms

Appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency in

children and young people and though it can present at any age

the majority are between 10 and 20 years of age It is less mon in pre-school children when it commonly presents atypi-cally and at an advanced stage Older children usually presentwith more classic symptoms and signs The diagnosis ofabdominal pain in adolescent girls can, however, be difficult asmenstrual and tubo-ovarian pathologies occur Establishing agood relationship with the child and parents is important tofacilitate successful evaluation

com-Aetiology and pathogenesisFor over 120 years, since Fitz’s famous paper,1the fundamentalcause of appendicitis has remained poorly understood However,the widely accepted theory is one of proximal luminal obstruc-tion of the appendix by a faecolith or inflammatory swelling Thisresults in distension and reduced blood flow to the appendix withischaemia and necrosis of the wall In early appendicitis there isacute inflammation, oedema and congestion of the appendix.Subsequently, areas of gangrene develop and appear grey orblack at operation The lumen contains infective material andthere is commonly purulent fluid in the peritoneum A distendednecrotic appendix can perforate, spilling its infective contentsinto the peritoneal cavity

The appendix usually perforates on the anti-mesenteric borderand may present with localized or generalized peritonitisdepending on whether the inflammation is well contained or not

An inflammatory appendix mass made up of small bowel andomentum can form around a perforated appendix

Anorexia or nausea are common features of acute citis Vomiting, if present, is usually non-bilious initially Aninflamed pelvic appendix may induce small-volume but frequentstools that can be confused with the diarrhoea associated withgastroenteritis A history of recent illness and medication, espe-cially pain killers and antibiotics, is important Specific questionsregarding respiratory and ear, nose and throat symptoms should

appendi-be sought If symptoms have appendi-been present for over 4 days theabdominal examination should include careful palpation for anappendix mass

SignsOverall assessment should include weight, height and generalinspection, looking to exclude stigmata of chronic ill health.Observing the child walking and getting onto the examinationcouch can alert the examiner to the presence of peritonitis Thepatient who can jump up and down without obvious discomfort

is unlikely to have appendicitis, and some use this as a test tohelp assess the less ill patient Low-grade pyrexia is usuallypresent in the range 37.4e38.5C Temperatures above 39C may

Aly Shalaby MRCS is a Specialist Registrar in the Department of

Paediatric Surgery, King’s College Hospital, London, UK Conflicts of

interest: none declared.

Niyi Ade-Ajayi MPhil FRCS(I) FRCS(Paed) is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon

at King’s College Hospital, London, UK Conflicts of interest: none

declared.

Trang 13

be secondary to viral illness, urinary tract infections or

perfora-tion of the appendix with generalized peritonitis Assessment of

hydration helps to inform the initial fluid resuscitation and the

urine specific gravity is a useful measure that is often overlooked

The tongue is inspected and the pulse taken when the child is

settled

A furred tongue and a bounding pulse are typical of

appen-dicitis The chest is inspected and careful auscultation carried out

to look for evidence of chest infection since a lower lobe

pneu-monia can present with abdominal pain The ears and throat are

examined for otitis media and tonsillitis, respectively Abdominal

examination includes looking for the point of maximal

tender-ness and signs of peritonitis; often maximum tendertender-ness is

directly over the appendix Significant faecal loading associated

with constipation should be excluded though rectal examination

is usually unnecessary The groins should be checked, looking

for hernias and, in boys, the scrotum should be examined The

renal angles should be palpated for tenderness The differential

diagnoses for abdominal pain in children appears inTable 1

Investigations

Accurate history and clinical examination are often all that are

required to diagnose or rule out appendicitis A urine sample for

a dipstick test is usually taken when the child arrives at the

hospital and this is a sensitive test for urinary tract infection If

positive, the urine should be sent for microscopy and culture

The urine specific gravity gives a guide to hydration (1.030 dry,

1.010 well hydrated) Serum white cell count may support

clin-ical suspicion However, an elevated white cell count should not

be the primary indication for appendicectomy Other useful

blood tests include serum amylase and C-reactive protein (CRP)

The former is done to rule out pancreatitis and the latter to

confirm the clinical suspicion of an active inflammatory process.Plain abdominal radiography is occasionally indicated if there is

a history suggestive of urinary calculi A plain X-ray may revealcalculi in the urinary tract A faecolith in the right iliac fossa may

be seen with appendicitis Widespread faecal loading may vide an alternative explanation for pain but remember thatconstipation does not cause fever or right iliac fossa tenderness.Abdominal ultrasound (US) may help when the diagnosis isequivocal; this is especially useful in adolescent girls to rule outtubo-ovarian pathology When an appendix mass is palpated, USmay provide useful information about the size, content (smallbowel, omentum and appendix) and whether there is pus withinthe mass that might require drainage Some centres advocatefast, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans for thispurpose and for establishing the diagnosis in doubtful cases (e.g.typhlitis, Crohn’s disease, pancreatitis); however, in the UK, theradiation dose is considered justifiable only for a small number ofchildren In 2004, a survey of the management of appendicitis inthe US reported that the majority of paediatric surgeons preferred

pro-CT scans as part of their preoperative workup.2A contemporaryreport demonstrated no decrease in negative appendicectomyrates using CT.3Several studies from the USA have questionedits value noting the radiation risk UK paediatric surgeons have

a preference for US compared to CT Although US is operatordependent, it is readily available, repeatable and does notexpose the child to ionizing radiation

Some children have a long history of recurrent, significantabdominal pain Signs may be few and initial investigationsnegative This sub-group of patients warrant additional investi-gation which may include flexible and capsule endoscopy and aMeckel scan If these investigations are negative a proportionmay benefit from diagnostic laparoscopy.4A comprehensive re-view of chronic abdominal pain (CAP) in children was recentlypublished by Wright et al.5

ManagementFollowing initial clinical assessment, the child is put into one ofthree categories: has not got appendicitis, has got appendicitis, oruncertain If the patient has no significant symptoms or signs of

an acute abdomen, and the social setting is appropriate, they can

be discharged with advice to return if there is persistence orworsening of the condition If appendicitis is likely, preparationfor surgery should commence with fluid resuscitation andintravenous antibiotics

The timing of surgery is also important Fitz1and McBurney6advocated early surgery but morbidity was high Antibioticsdramatically changed the outlook and current recommenda-tions from both the UK and the USA is to perform the surgery indaylight hours after antibiotics and fluids have been given.Emergency surgery late at night or in the early hours of themorning, in a child that has not been fully resuscitated, is rarelyindicated If this is thought to be necessary senior consultation

is mandatory and access to intensive care is likely to be needed

In situations where the symptoms are significant but thediagnosis is doubtful, the child should be admitted for activeobservation and possibly, further investigation.7 Antibioticsshould not be commenced The child’s vital signs should bemonitored at regular intervals Regular surgical evaluation

Age-dependent differential diagnoses in children

presenting with abdominal pain to hospital

Pre-school Older child Adolescent

Acute appendicitis Acute appendicitis Acute appendicitis

Gastroenteritis Gastroenteritis Gastroenteritis

Urinary tract

infection

Urinary tract infection

Urinary tract infection Respiratory tract

infection

Respiratory tract infection

Respiratory tract infection Henoch eSchonlein

purpura

Henoch eSchonlein purpura

Henoch eSchonlein purpura

Constipation Constipation Acute scrotum

Intussusception Meckel’s diverticulitis Ovarian pathology

Non-specific abdominal pain

Fallopian tube pathology Acute scrotum Inflammatory bowel

disease Non-specific abdominal pain Pancreatitis Renal stones Table 1

Trang 14

should be carried out by appropriately experienced clinicians.

When possible, the review team should include the admitting

surgeon During this period the child is given analgesia as

required and is allowed only clear fluids by mouth to avoid

de-lays in transfer to theatre if required Appendicitis is an evolving

process and if the diagnosis is unclear when the child is first

seen, it may be diagnosed with active observation The decision

to proceed to appendicectomy is based principally on finding

persistent guarding in the right iliac fossa If the pain andtenderness resolve spontaneously during active observation, thechild is discharged In adult and paediatric practice, high nega-tive appendicectomy rates were previously considered as anacceptable alternative to delayed diagnosis Active observationand selective investigation reduces the number of negative ap-pendicectomies However, it is interesting that most childrenwho have an apparently normal appendix removed in this situ-ation are cured of their pain

Despite awareness of the dangers of appendicitis and

continue to see advanced appendicitis when the diagnosis mighthave been made earlier

The treatment options for acute appendicitis and an appendixmass have continued to evolve and, increasingly are tailored tothe patient’s age and the diagnostic findings.Figure 1 summa-rizes our management strategy for children presenting to hospitalwith acute abdominal pain

Surgery

An older child or adolescent who requires surgery may besafely managed in a district hospital under the care of an adultgeneral surgeon with paediatric input Infants and toddlersshould be stabilized and discussed with a paediatric surgeryunit, with a view to transfer Fluid resuscitation is based onthe estimated deficit and is distinguished from maintenance

co-amoxiclav where the clavulanate component extends thespectrum of amoxicillin to Gram-negative and anaerobic cover.For complicated appendicitis we add in gentamicin to enhanceGram-negative cover and metronidazole to improve anaerobiccover A general anaesthetic with muscle relaxant is adminis-tered by a paediatric anaesthetist Appendicectomy can be open

or laparoscopic Open surgery is carried out via a right lowerquadrant transverse (Lanz) incision The external oblique

Abdominal pain

Not appendicitis

e.g Constipation –treat and discharge

Symptoms &

signs resolveNSAP

LA, laparoscopic appendicectomy; NSAP, non-specific abdominal pain.

Medicalproblem

Resuscitationand antibiotics

Active observationand investigations

Discharge Refer to

paediatrician

Appendicitissuspected

DischargeLA

Management of acute abdominal pain in children

Figure 1

Figure 2 Representation of theatre layout for laparoscopic

appendicec-tomy AS, Anaesthetic stack; AN, anaesthetist; ES, energy source; LS,

laparoscopic stack; SA, surgical assistant; S, surgeon; SN, scrub nurse; LT,

laparoscopic tray.

Trang 15

muscle is cut then split along its fibres The internal oblique

and transversus muscles are also split along their fibres and the

peritoneum is opened Fluid is sent for microbiology The

caecum is identified and the appendix isolated and

devascu-larized The base of the appendix is crushed using artery

forceps prior to ligation and removal Burying the stump using

a circumferential absorbable suture is recommended

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is now the preferred approachfor most paediatric surgeons.Figure 2 shows the theatre layoutand Figure 3 shows port positions for laparoscopicappendicectomy

A 5e12-mm umbilical port for the camera, inserted by theHasson technique is favoured Two 5-mm ports are sited low inthe left iliac fossa and bowel-holding forceps inserted for initialexploration Samples of intraperitoneal fluid are taken for cultureand antibiotic sensitivity using a suction device attached to atrap The appendix is identified, mobilized and devascularizedusing bowel-handling forceps and a hook diathermy Three pre-formed loops of absorbable suture material are placed around theappendix: two just distal to the origin of the appendix from thecaecum, and the third further along the appendix allowing suf-ficient room for the appendix to be cut between loops If exten-sive peritoneal contamination is present, a thorough washoutwith saline at the end of the procedure is required to decrease therisk of abscess formation

This standard three-port approach can be abbreviated to twoports if one of the instruments is used in parallel to a roticulatingscope Single-port appendicectomy is slowly gaining popularitybut is currently limited to older children.Figures 4and5are anexample of a single-port device used by the authors

A preoperatively diagnosed appendix abscess larger than 3 cm(Figure 6) is amenable to percutaneous drainage Drainage

Figure 3 Port site placement for laparoscopic appendicectomy X, 5 e12

mm-port placed by Hasson technique for camera; Y and Z, 5-mm ports

placed for instruments.

Figure 4 Components of the GelPointRAdvanced Access Platform, for single-port laparoscopy Image courtesy of Applied Medical Resources Corporation, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA.

Trang 16

should be followed by a course of antibiotics Percutaneous

drainage has its risks8and may not always be possible if there

are intervening abdominal viscera A randomized controlled

study showed no difference between immediate and interval

appendicectomy for an appendix abscess.9

The management of an appendix mass is controversial and

each case should be judged on merit A mass demonstrated

during initial assessment is conventionally treated with

intrave-nous antibiotics and fluids and an interval appendicectomy, 6

weeks after the acute admission, should be considered.10

Addi-tional controversies exist with regards to an appendix mass

identified only under anaesthetic Some surgeons have the child

woken up and then treated conventionally Faced with this

sce-nario and a short history, the authors proceed with a

laparo-scopic appendicectomy and convert to open surgery if the

procedure is deemed unduly challenging The approach of the

authors is summarized inFigure 7

Interval appendicectomy after successful management of

either an appendix mass or an appendix abscess should be

dis-cussed with the patient and parents The risk of recurrent

appendicitis has been estimated anywhere between 15% and

25% whilst the complications of interval appendicectomy

include wound infection, ileus, haematoma and bowel

obstruc-tion have been reported as 3.4%.11

HistologyThe appendix is sent for histological examination and reviewed

by the surgeon In uncomplicated appendicitis this usually showssubmucosal or transmural neutrophil infiltration Intraluminalworms such as Enterobius vermicularis (pinworms) are some-times found and arrangements should be made for anti-helminthics for the child and close contacts Unusual histologysuch as a carcinoid tumour may occasionally be found Tumours

2 cm or smaller are cured by an appendicectomy Further ment of larger tumours is controversial due to lack of evidence;however traditional teaching is to perform a right hemi-colectomy along with the resection of the regional mesentericlymph nodes

treat-ComplicationsMeticulous surgical technique including gentle tissue handlingshould reduce intraoperative complications such as bowelperforation and ureteric injury Early postoperative complica-tions include abscess formation (around 2%) which may betreated with antibiotics or percutaneous image-guided drainage.Other complications include adhesive bowel obstruction which ismore common if the appendix was perforated Recurrentappendicitis has also been reported in cases where a long ap-pendix stump was left behind

PrognosisMortality following appendicitis in childhood is rare in the UK.The case fatality rate fell from 1.06 to 0.16 per 1000 discharges inthe 30 years to 1997 Earlier presentation and improved clinicaldiagnosis are likely to have been important contributors to thisreduction, as are an increased availability of specialist paediatricmedical, anaesthetic and surgical services Morbidity resultsfrom delayed presentation for a medical opinion or referral aswell as inadequate pre-operative preparation and poor surgicaltechnique Overall, however, children with acute appendicitismanaged in appropriately resourced units generally recover with

Figure 5 Three-dimensional rendering of the assembled GelPoint R for

single-port laparoscopy Image courtesy of Applied Medical Resources

Corporation, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA.

Figure 6 Computed tomography scan showing an intra-abdominal abscess secondary to appendicitis.

Trang 17

1 Fitz RH Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix, with

special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment Trans Assoc

Am Physicians 1886; 1: 107 e36

2 Muehlstedt SG, Pham TQ, Schmeling DJ The management of pediatric

appendicitis: a survey of North American Pediatric Surgeons J Pediatr

Surg 2004; 39: 875 e9

3 Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B, Caniano DA CT scans may not

reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children J Pediatr Surg

2004; 39: 886 e90

4 Kolts RL, Nelson RS, Park R, Heikenen J Exploratory laparoscopy for

recurrent right lower quadrant pain in a pediatric population Pediatr

Surg Int 2006; 22: 247 e9

5 Wright NJ, Hammond PJ, Curry JI Chronic abdominal pain in children:

help in spotting the organic diagnosis Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed

J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 977 e80

9 St Peter SD, Aguayo P, Fraser JD, et al Initial laparoscopic dectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval ap- pendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a prospective, randomized trial J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 236 e40

appen-10 Gillick J, Velayudham M, Puri P Conservative management of appendix mass in children Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1539 e42

11 Hall NJ, Jones CE, Eaton S, Stanton MP, Burge DM Is interval cectomy justified after successful nonoperative treatment of an appendix mass in children? A systematic review J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46: 767 e71

appendi-Appendix mass

Abdominal US

Diagnosed preoperativelyDiagnosed after anaesthesia

Shorthistory

Shorthistory

LA, laparoscopic appendicectomy; US, ultrasound

Longhistory

Treat with antibiotics6–8 -week

interval

If difficult

Image-guidedpercutaneous drain

Wakepatient up

Trang 18

Gastro-oesophageal reflux occurring infrequently and without symptoms

or occurring without damage to the oesophagus is not considered

path-ological, otherwise the reflux and the pathology are referred to as

gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) Factors predisposing to GORD

include: impairments to the physiological antireflux barrier and

anatom-ical abnormalities of the oesophagus or diaphragm Non-operative and

medical management result in resolution of symptoms in the majority

of children Surgery is indicated in the event of failure of medical

manage-ment or severe complications and in neurologically normal children this

would usually be a laparoscopic or open fundoplication In severely

neurologically impaired children other options are sometimes considered

and these include: fundoplication with or without vagotomy and

pyloro-plasty; surgical feeding jejunostomy and oesophago-gastric dissociation.

Keywords Antireflux procedure; fundoplication; gastro-oesophageal

reflux; non-bilious vomiting

Definition and epidemiology

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is the passage of gastric

con-tents into the oesophagus associated with or without

regurgita-tion or vomiting Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is

defined as the presence of GOR with symptoms or complications

A recent Italian population study reported a prevalence of 12%

for GOR in infants

Aetiology

The process of swallowing involves the onset of oesophageal

peristaltic waves and associated relaxation of the upper and

lower oesophageal sphincters These are regulated by the vagus

and sympathetic nerves through the intrinsic neural network of

the oesophagus In GOR, non-deglutatory peristaltic waves are

triggered to achieve clearance The factors promoting GOR are

increased intra-abdominal pressure, strong gastric contractions,

reverse gastric peristalsis, negative pressure in the oesophagusduring inspiration and sometimes the lying down position.The physiological antireflux barrier (Figure 1) is made up ofthe following:

 The lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) composed of:

 the inner circular smooth muscle layer of oesophagus

 high normal resting tone of the lower oesophagus whichrelaxes only during swallowing

 The flutter valve formed by the mucosal fold below theLOS

 The diaphragmatic crural sling composed of striatedmuscle which contracts rhythmically during the respira-tory cycle and displaces the gastro-oesophageal junctiondownwards, closing it tightly during inspiration andforming an external pinchcock mechanism

There are several other minor components protecting againstGOR including increased intra-abdominal oesophageal pressure,the angle of His, alkaline saliva in the oesophagus bufferinggastric acid, and protective mucus

Anatomical disruption (e.g hiatus hernia, congenital phragmatic hernia, oesophageal atresia) or functional abolition(neurological disorders) of one or more of the protective mech-anisms result in GOR The occurrence of non-deglutatory tran-sient lower oesophageal sphincteric relaxation accounts for mostepisodes of GOR

dia-Clinical presentationMost infants with GORD present with varying degrees of non-bilious vomiting or discomfort following feeds Ear, nose andthroat (ENT) symptoms including recurrent tonsillitis, otitis andlaryngeal polyps are less commonly reported Infants with severeGORD can present with complications including apparent life-threatening events (ALTE), aspiration pneumonia, chronic cough

or recurrent wheeze Severe GORD rarely results in nutritionaldeficiencies and failure to thrive and paradoxically children can

be overweight because they can consume inappropriate ties of milk if this relieves symptoms Older children tend topresent with heartburn and dysphagia especially when the GORDhas resulted in a stricture A stricture may also present with foodbolus obstruction or oesophageal regurgitation which can bedistinguished from vomiting as the food is often unaltered.Oesophagitis can cause pain, iron deficiency anaemia and blood

quanti-in the vomit Sandifer syndrome is seen chronic reflux, and ischaracterized by dystonic body movements or spastic torticollis.Aspiration of gastric contents into the respiratory tract can result

in bronchospasm, recurrent lower respiratory infections andatelectasis Cases of sudden death have also been reported Long-term risks of GORD include oesophageal strictures, Barrett’soesophagus and an increased risk of oesophageal carcinoma

Investigations

In a recent survey of American paediatric surgeons, most geons reported that their decision to proceed to an antirefluxprocedure was based mainly on the clinical history from parentsthan on investigations demonstrating GORD There is no singleinvestigation which predicts response to medical or surgicaltherapy

sur-Dhanya Mullassery MRCS PhD is a Specialty Trainee in Paediatric Surgery

at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK Conflicts of interest:

none declared.

Matthew O Jones MD FRCS (Paed) is a Consultant in Paediatric Surgery at

Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK Conflicts of interest: none

declared.

Trang 19

Upper gastrointestinal contrast studies may be used to

delin-eate the anatomy of LOS and rule out a hiatus hernia GOR can be

classified on contrast swallow examination as followse grade 1

(reflux into distal oesophagus); grade 2 (reflux into proximal

thoracic oesophagus); grade 3 (reflux into cervical oesophagus);

grade 4 (continuous reflux) and grade 5 (aspiration into

respi-ratory tract) Figure 2 shows an upper gastrointestinal (GI)

contrast swallow demonstrating severe GOR However, routine

contrast studies are not recommended due to the high

false-positive and -negative rates and also the associated risk of

radiation Contrast studies can rule out other causes of

vomiting such as malrotation and gastric or bowel obstruction

Twenty-four-hour pH studies help quantify aspects of acid

reflux The number of acid reflux episodes, their duration and

timing in relation to activities can be recorded A reflux index is

defined as the percentage of time the measured oesophageal pH

is less than 4 If this is above 5% of the time it is considered

abnormal This measure alone does not correlate well with the

severity of symptoms in infants This discrepancy may be due to

the buffering of gastric acid by milk feeds Both the North

American and European Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology

and Nutrition have made specific recommendations for the

in-dications for the use of oesophageal pH monitoring in children

changes in electrical resistance between multiple electrodes

placed along the oesophagus and can be used to calculate the

direction and velocity of bolus movements in the oesophagus

This has the advantage of being able to detect not only

oeso-phageal acid exposure but also neutral or even alkaline reflux

events which are more common in newborns MII with pH

motoring has been shown to double the probability of

compared to pH monitoring alone in infants

Upper GI endoscopy is used to assess oesophagitis secondary to

reflux Endoscopically oesophagitis is classified by the Savary

Miller scoring system as grade 1 (erythema of mucosa), grade 2

(linear non circular ulceration) grade 3 (confluent ulceration) and

grade 4 (stricture) A negative endoscopic examination, however,does not exclude GORD in infants or patients on H2blockers orproton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatments Endoscopic biopsy helps

to rule out other causes of oesophagitis and to diagnose andmonitor Barrett’s oesophagus

Oesophageal manometry is sometimes used in older children

to assess the function of the LOS However, non-deglutatory laxations are difficult to record accurately

re-It is noteworthy that in many neurologically disabled patients,objective evidence of GORD is sometimes absent even in thepresence of marked symptoms This suggests that, in these pa-tients, the condition is more than mere ‘acid reflux’, and may becompounded by inappropriate neurological responses Disor-dered physiological responses have been demonstrated byelectro-gastrographic and gastric emptying studies

ManagementMost neonates have GOR which resolves spontaneously by theage of 18 months Infants with GORD are initially managed usingconservative measures Thickened feeds reduces regurgitationbut does not always decrease the frequency of reflux episodes.Raising the head of the bed has not been shown to have abeneficial effect in infants with GOR Whereas prone or a left-sided sleeping position with elevation of the bed has been shown

to be of benefit in adults with GOR

H2 receptor antagonists (ranitidine) help in symptomaticimprovement of GORD, but tolerance can be a problem PPIsinactivate the HþKþadenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) pumpand are currently the medical treatment of choice for symptoms

of GORD and oesophagitis Complications of PPIs include anincreased risk of community-acquired pneumonias especially inimmunocompromised children However, the evidence does notsupport the use of PPIs in infants Recent studies suggest a po-tential role for baclofen in inhibiting LOS relaxation Motilityagents such as domperidone are widely used although random-ized controlled trials do not support their use

Diaphragmaticcrus

Figure 2 Contrast swallow demonstrating severe gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Trang 20

Surgical management

Surgery for GORD is indicated when there has been an

inade-quate response to medical management or the presence of

sig-nificant or recurrent respiratory complications Surgery may be

considered early in children with neurological impairment and

those with anatomical factors contributing to GORD (e.g

oeso-phageal atresia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia) The aim of

antireflux surgery is to reconstruct an effective antireflux barrier

maintaining the free passage of food through the

gastro-oesophageal junction The most common procedure is a

fundo-plication, which decreases reflux by increasing the LOS pressure,

relaxations

The loose Nissen fundoplication is illustrated inFigure 3 This

entails a 360-degree wrap of gastric fundus around the lower

oesophagus that acts as an effective pneumohydraulic valve The

procedure involves mobilization of the upper third to half of the

greater curvature with or without division or ligation of short

gastric vessels This is followed by mobilization of the abdominal

oesophagus to enable encircling of the fundus around the

oesophagus above the left gastric vessels A single or double

layer of braided non-absorbable sutures are used A long wrap or

a tight wrap can result in gas bloat (air trapping in the stomach)

and dysphagia The fundoplication is combined with

approxi-mation of the crura if needed and always if there is a hiatus

hernia to repair

Laparoscopic fundoplication is being increasingly performed

with short term success rates similar to the open procedure and

the advantages of shorter postoperative stay and lesser analgesic

requirements Long-term results from randomized controlled

trials are awaited

Anterior (Thal) or posterior (Toupet) wraps of 180-degrees are

preferred by some surgeons for fundoplication in patients who

have had repair of oesophageal atresia to avoid dysphagia in the

context of poor oesophageal motility

In children with neurological disorders, delayed gastric

emptying, spasticity and retching contribute to the severity of

symptoms and Nissen fundoplication alone (whether open or

laparoscopic) often achieves only modest symptomatic relief,whereas fundoplication combined with vagotomy and pylo-roplasty results in both a better functional outcome and a lowerrate of subsequent revision Since most children in this grouphave difficulty feeding by mouth, they also tend to have a feedinggastrostomy

An alternative to fundoplication and feeding gastrostomy inchildren with neurological impairment is to form a surgicaljejunostomy for feeding to reduce reflux episodes whileproviding nutrition The main long-term complication of a sur-gical feeding jejunostomy is volvulus of the jejunal limb.Children with severe neurological impairment who fail torespond to the above procedures may be considered for anoesophago-gastric dissociation with a Roux-en-Y feeding jeju-nostomy (Figure 4) This technically demanding procedure may

be complicated by gas accumulating within the distal bowel,presumably because the rearranged anatomy precludes theregurgitation of swallowed gas, and so caution is advised inchildren with poor colonic motility

Recent advances in endoscopy have introduced new reflux procedures including endoluminal fundoplication, radio-frequency application to the oesophago-gastric junction and in-jection of an inert material at the LOS reducing its distensibility.Outcomes

anti-A recent systematic review reported a median success rate of 86%(57e100%) for antireflux surgery in children with GORD Similarrecurrence rates have been reported for open and laparoscopicfundoplication The failure rates after redo fundoplication havebeen reported to be between 7% and 26% The risk factors forrecurrence are younger age and co-morbidities including neuro-logical impairment A recent randomized controlled trial in adultsreported the use of antireflux medications in 44% of patients 5years following laparoscopic fundoplication

Dysphagia can result when the wrap is too long or too tight Arecent randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic

Oesophagus

Fundus wrapapproximated usingnon-absorbable sutures

Trang 21

Nissen and Thal fundoplications reported a significantly lower

rate of recurrence for Nissen procedure but with a higher rate of

dysphagia in neurologically normal children Other early

post-operative complications include oesophageal perforation,

pneu-monia and wound infection Gas bloat can also result from a tight

wrap Dumping has been reported following fundoplication

especially when performed with a pyloroplasty

Children with neurological problems have the highest risk of

postoperative complications including wrap failure, respiratory

complications and death Wrap failure has been reported in 20

e50% of neurologically impaired children Antireflux surgery

has been shown to reduce significant respiratory events causing

hospital admissions in neurologically impaired children under 4

years of age but not in older children

Conclusions

GOR is common in neonates and spontaneously settles in the

majority after infancy The diagnosis of GORD is mainly based on

the history with supportive investigations in selected patients

Surgery is indicated for those who fail to respond to medical

management and for complications The surgical

armamen-tarium of antireflux surgery includes fundoplication, feeding

jejunostomy and oesophago-gastric dissociation The outcomes

of surgery are variable and failure rates and complications are

FURTHER READING

Campanozzi A, Boccia G, Pensabene L, et al Prevalence and natural

history of gastroesophageal reflux: pediatric prospective survey.

Pediatrics 2009; 123: 779 e83

Craig WR, Hanlon-Dearman A, Sinclair C, et al Metoclopramide, thickened feedings, and positioning for gastro-oesophageal reflux in children under two years Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD003502 Fonkalsrud EW, Ament ME, Berquist W Surgical management of the gastroesophageal reflux syndrome in childhood Surgery 1985; 97: 42 e8

Jeurnink SM, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MY, Siersema PD, et al Barrett’s esophagus in children: does it need more attention? Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 682 e7

Lall A, Morabito A, Dall’Oglio L, et al Total oesophagogastric dissociation: experience in 2 centres J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41: 342 e6

Mauritz FA, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MY, Stomp W, et al The effects and efficacy of antireflux surgery in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:

1872 e8 Srivastava R, Berry JG, Hall M, et al Reflux related hospital admissions after fundoplication in children with neurological impairment: retro- spective cohort study Br Med J 2009; 339: b4411

Vandenplas Y, Rudolph CD, Di Lorenzo C, et al North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, European Soci- ety for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommen- dations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009; 49: 498 e547 Williams AR, Borsellino A, Sugarman ID, Crabbe DC Roux-en-Y feeding jejunostomy in infants and children Eur J Pediatr Surg 2007; 17: 29 e33

Wockenforth R, Gillespie CS, Jaffray B Survival of children following Nissen fundoplication Br J Surg 2011; 98: 680 e5

Trang 22

Oesophageal atresia

Gareth P Hosie

Elizabeth Gavens

Abstract

Oesophageal atresia is a congenital malformation that affects

approxi-mately 1 in 4000 newborn infants It is most commonly associated with

a distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula It can also be associated with

verte-bral anomalies, anorectal malformation, cardiac defects, renal and limb

anomalies It requires surgery, usually within the first day of life to correct

the anomaly and establish continuity of the gastrointestinal tract.

Keywords Congenital anomaly; gastro-oesophageal reflux; neonate;

oesophagus; paediatric surgery

Background

Oesophageal atresia (OA) is a congenital anomaly in which a

variable portion of the oesophagus is not formed The

com-monest configuration is a blind-ending upper oesophageal

pouch, with a distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF)

connect-ing the lower oesophagus to the trachea Oesophageal atresia

requires surgery to correct the anomaly and this is usually

per-formed within the first 24e36 hours of life

The incidence varies globally, but is between 1 in 2500 and 1

in 4000 births There is no gender predominance and there has

currently been no common genetic anomaly identified, although

siblings of a child with oesophageal atresia have a 1e2%

inci-dence One-third of infants with oesophageal atresia are born

prematurely The condition itself does not have a high mortality

and infants who die with oesophageal atresia usually do so from

associated, usually cardiac, conditions

Embryology

The oesophagus is derived from the primitive foregut by day 20

of gestation The respiratory tract forms by day 26 from a groove

on the ventral aspect of the foregut Over the next 2 days the

trachea and bronchial tree develop as tubular structures separate

from the oesophagus This occurs as a result of the development

of tracheo-oesophageal folds that fuse together to form the

tracheo-oesophageal septum separating the ventral trachea from

the dorsal oesophagus The stimulus for this separation of the

gastrointestinal and respiratory tract is not fully understood, but

it is disruption of this process that results in oesophageal atresia

in its many forms

ClassificationOesophageal atresia presents anatomically with a variety ofconfigurations By far the commonest type is the presence of ablind-ending proximal oesophagus, with the distal oesophagusattached to the trachea in the form of a tracheo-oesophagealfistula (Figure 1, Type C) Oesophageal atresia can also occur inthe absence of a TOF when it is known as a pure oesophagealatresia (Figure 1a, Type A)

Associated anomaliesThere are a number of anomalies associated with oesophagealatresia and the majority of patients have one of more of theseanomalies The frequency of occurrence of these associations is

so common, that there are a number of named associations, themost common being VACTERL association (Box 1) An associa-tion is the non-random occurrence of a group of anomalieswithout a known common aetiological factor This is distinctfrom a syndrome, which is the occurrence of a group of anom-alies due to a single (often genetic) aetiology

DiagnosisMost infants with oesophageal atresia are diagnosed postnatallywithin the first few hours of life Some are suspected antenatallywhen there is polyhydramnios and a small or ‘absent’ stomach onultrasound scanning (USS) If there are antenatal suspicions theparents should undergo antenatal counselling including the dis-cussion of associated anomalies Any newborn whose mother hadpolyhydramnios during pregnancy should have a naso-gastric tube(NGT) passed to exclude the diagnosis of oesophageal atresia.Postnatally, oesophageal atresia is usually suspected when aninfant is drooling and unable to swallow saliva Attempts atfeeding lead to spluttering, coughing and can cause aspirationand cyanosis Attempts to pass a nasogastric tube are unsuc-cessful as resistance is felt, usually at about 10 cm from the lips,when the tube hits the bottom of the oesophageal pouch.Once suspected a chest radiograph with a tube in the upperpouch confirms the diagnosis The tube should be a large tube,around a size 10 Fr and gentle pressure should ideally be placed

on the tube during the X-ray examination If there is an phageal atresia, this will show the NGT curling in the pouch(Figure 2) If there is an associated distal tracheo-oesophagealfistula this will show air in the stomach and distal bowel If there

oeso-is a pure oesophageal atresia there will be no air in the stomach.Infants who have been diagnosed with oesophageal atresiarequire an echocardiogram, USS examination of the renal tractand a full spinal X-ray

Initial managementInfants with oesophageal atresia should undergo a full baby check

to look for any other associated anomaly The infant should bekept warm and receive maintenance fluids A double bore tubecalled a Replogle tube should also be passed via the nostril into theoesophageal pouch This enables aspiration of saliva and secre-tions The Replogle tube is a sump drain and the presence of the

Gareth P Hosie MBChB FRCS(Paed) is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon at

the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK Conflicts of

interest: none.

Elizabeth Gavens BM BS BMed Sci MRCS is a Specialist Trainee in Paediatric

Surgery at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Conflicts of interest: none.

Trang 23

second lumen allows continuous suction on the tube and for the

tube to be flushed and therefore unblocked if necessary

Surgery

Oesophageal atresia requires surgical correction, usually with the

first 24 hours of life If possible this should be carried out during

usual working hours rather than out of hours Infants with

associated duodenal atresia, progressive abdominal distension,

or who require positive pressure ventilation should undergo

emergency surgery and not be left overnight The major risk of

positive pressure ventilation is that gas passes through the fistula

and distends the abdomen and so impairs ventilation Gastricperforation can occur The need for ventilation is most common

in premature babies In such compromised babies, particularlythose under 1.5 kg, an emergency ligation of the TOF alone can

be a lifesaving procedure and the anastomosis can be fashioned

at a second operation

Bronchoscopy is useful at the beginning of the procedure toconfirm the position of the distal tracheo-oesophageal fistula(Figure 3) This is also useful to rule out a rare proximal fistula tothe upper pouch or a cleft of the larynx The anaesthetist aims toplace the tip of the endotracheal tube beyond the tracheo-oeso-phageal fistula, as this limits gas flow into the stomach For thesame reason ventilation is ideally administered without paralysisfor as long as possible

The repair can be performed either thoracoscopically orthrough a right thoracotomy The thoracotomy is performedthrough a right infrascapular incision (Figure 4)

The thoracic cavity is entered at the fourth intercostal spaceand an extra-pleural approach is maintained by sweeping theparietal pleura off the chest wall The azygous vein is identifiedand ligated before division This will allow identification of thedistal oesophagus joining the trachea at the tracheo-oesophagealfistula The fistula is then divided, repairing the tracheal wallwith non-absorbable sutures The proximal oesophagus is thenidentified at the thoracic inlet by asking the anaesthetist to push

Anatomical classification of oesophageal atresia

Type A – Oesophageal atresia without

fistula or so-called pure oesophageal

Type D – Oesophageal atresia with

proximal and distal TOFs (<1%)

Type E – TOF without oesophageal atresia or so-called H-type fistula (4%)

Type F – Congenital oesophageal stenosis (<1%)

Figure 1

VACTERL association

V e Vertebral Multiple/single hemivertebrae, scoliosis, rib

anomalies

A e Anorectal e Imperforate anus

C e Cardiac Most commonly ventricular septal defect (VSD)

T e Trachea Tracheo-oesophageal fistula

E e Oesophageal

R e Renal tract anomalies

L e Limb anomalies (radial or tibial)

Box 1

619 Ó 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Trang 24

down on a tube in the lumen of the proximal oesophageal pouch.

This pouch must be mobilized sufficiently to enable an

anasto-mosis with the distal oesophagus Excessive mobilization of the

distal oesophagus should be avoided as this structure receives a

segmented blood supply which can be disrupted by excessive

dissection The anastomosis is performed using interrupted

absorbable 5.0 sutures A trans-anastomotic tube is often passed

prior to the completion of the anastomosis The tube, will allow

early enteral feeding beyond the anastomosis A chest drain is

inserted with only if there is anxiety about the security of the

anastomosis

Surgical management of anatomical variants

H-type tracheo-oesophageal fistula

This fistula often has a cervical rather than intra-thoracic

loca-tion It is useful to perform a bronchoscopy and pass a soft wire

through the fistula from the trachea to the oesophagus An

oesophagoscopy is then undertaken and the end of the wire

brought out through the mouth The surgical approach is through

a right cervical incision and the fistula can be identified by

applying traction to the wire Once identified the fistula is dividedand the tracheal and oesophageal walls repaired

Pure oesophageal atresia

In this condition there is a long gap between the upper phageal pouch and the distal oesophagus which means that thetwo ends cannot be primarily brought together The commonestapproach is to undertake an initial gastrostomy to enable theinfant to feed enterally, and wait for the child to grow for 2e3months, after which the comparative length of the oesophagealgap will have shortened, enabling a delayed primary anastomosis

oeso-of the oesophagus in 80e90% cases During this time, the upperoesophageal pouch must be kept clear of secretions with regularsuctioning via the Replogle tube This requires skilled andintensive nursing If this is not available, then a safer but lesssatisfactory approach is to exteriorise the upper pouch in theform of a cervical oesophagostomy

If there is not enough native oesophagus to enable a delayedrepair then oesophageal substitution is required A number oftechniques are available, using stomach, colonic or small bowelinterposition

ComplicationsAnastomotic leake occurs in 5e15% of infants, usually on day

5 postoperatively Infants present with mild pyrexia, increasedwork of breathing or if they have a chest drain, saliva or milk inthe drain Most leaks will heal with conservative management,with the infant placed nil by mouth, a chest drain on freedrainage and antibiotics If the leak persists then revision surgery

is indicated

Anastomotic stricture (Figure 5)e is a common complication,especially if the anastomosis was under tension, or if there was

an anastomotic leak Anastomotic strictures usually respond to

Figure 3 Operative tracheoscopy demonstrating a tracheo-oesophageal

fistula above the carina.

Site of incision

Figure 4

Figure 2 A plain chest X-ray showing a coiled tube in the upper pouch and

gas in the stomach An associated duodenal atresia cannot be excluded

on this film and so an abdominal film is also required Note the large

thymus.

Trang 25

dilatation There is higher incidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux

in patients after an oesophageal atresia repair, and the presence

of acid in the oesophageal lumen can contribute to stricture

formation Infants with a persistent stricture may require a

gastric fundoplication, after which the stricture markedly

improves

Recurrent tracheo-oesophageal fistulae this is a rare

compli-cation, most commonly occurring after an anastomotic leak which

has caused inflammation at the site of the tracheo-oesophageal

fistula repair The infant presents with recurrent chest infections

or choking or cyanosis with feeds

oesophageal atresia and is due to an inherent weakness of the

tracheal cartilages allowing the anterior and posterior tracheal

walls to move towards each other in expiration or coughing This

can lead to apnoeas when feeding or cyanotic near-death episodes

Tracheomalacia also accounts for the characteristic barking cough

that is a feature of children with repaired oesophageal atresia It

will improve with time but, if life-threatening, surgical

interven-tion is required What is often performed is an aortopexy In this

interesting operation the anterior wall of the aorta is stitched to theback of the sternum so pulling it forward The adventitia betweenthe aorta and the trachea then pulls the trachea open

Chylous leake this rare complication occurs due to a disruption

of the thoracic duct This is managed conservatively with a chestdrain on free drainage, medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) feedsand octreotide This can take up to 1 month to resolve.Oesophageal dysmotility

All infants with oesophageal atresia have a degree of abnormaloesophageal peristaltic activity This can cause dysphagia andfood bolus obstruction in the absence of a stricture Thesesymptoms tend to improve as the infant gets older

OutcomeSurvival rates for infants with oesophageal atresia haveimproved from less than 40% when repair was first undertaken

in the 1940s to 95% today There is a higher risk of death if theinfant has a birthweight below 1500 g, has major congenital heartdisease, severe associated anomalies or a long oesophageal gap.Children need follow-up to ensure that there are no ongoingproblems related to for example oesophageal dysmotility, chestinfections, gastro-oesophageal reflux, spinal anomalies and otherassociated defects The first survivors of oesophageal atresia arenow reaching their 50s and 60s Although Barrett’s oesophagusand malignant change secondary to reflux in this group of pa-tients have been described, recent population studies have not

FURTHER READING

Burge DM, Shah K, Spark P, et al Contemporary management and comes for infants born with oesophageal atresia Br J Surg 2013 March; 100: 515 e21

out-Mitchell B, Sharma R Embryology, an illustrated colour text Churchill Livingstone, 2005

Orford J, Manglick P, Cass DT, Tam PP Mechanisms for the development of esophageal atresia J Pediatr Surg 2001 Jul; 36: 985 e94

Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA, Drake DP Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 723 e5

Stringer MD, McKenna KM, Goldstein RB, et al Prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 1258 e63

Figure 5 Oesophagoscopy demonstrating an anastomotic stricture 6

months after repair of oesophageal atresia.

621 Ó 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Trang 26

The vomiting infant: pyloric

stenosis

Brian W Davies

Abstract

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is the commonest reason to

perform an intra-abdominal operation on a young infant It is thus an

important condition for the trainee surgeon to understand It illustrates

many important lessons in diagnosis, preoperative preparation, operative

skill and postoperative management and how to apply them to infants

and babies to achieve the excellent outcome that is expected with

mini-mal morbidity.

For these reasons, and the application of basic sciences, it is a common

topic for postgraduate examination.

For the trainee in paediatric surgery it is a key operation to learn to

perform well and is a stepping-stone to performing neonatal surgery.

Keywords Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; pyloromyotomy;

Ramstedt

Introduction

Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is the commonest

surgical cause of non-bilious vomiting in infancy It typically

presents 2e8 weeks after birth and is characterized by

hyper-trophy of the pyloric smooth muscle, producing a progressive

gastric outlet obstruction and a hypochloraemic metabolic

alka-losis Other common causes of non-bilious vomiting in this age

group are listed inBox 1

The first accurate description of IHPS is generally attributed to

the Danish paediatrician Harald Hirschsprung, who described

clinical and autopsy findings in 1887 The mortality rate for the

condition remained high despite attempted surgical treatments

including dilatation via gastrostomy and pyloroplasty In 1912

Conrad Ramstedt described a case of IHPS treated by transverse

pyloroplasty where the sutures cut out; unusually the patient

survived In his next patient he deliberately left the

pylo-romyotomy unsutured Although various surgical incisions to

approach the pylorus have been described since, once the

pylo-rus is reached, a Ramstedt’s pyloromyotomy is still performed

Epidemiology

In the UK the incidence of IHPS is approximately 3/1000 and

falling The incidence is much lower in AfroeCarribean and Asian

children IHPS usually presents between 2 and 8 weeks of life and

almost never beyond 3 months of age There is a 4:1 male

pre-ponderance and familial cases occur: the recurrence risk of IHPS in

the child of an affected father is 1:20 for male and 1:50 for femaleoffspring The risk of IHPS in children of an affected mother ismuch higher at 1:6 It is less frequent in breast fed babies.Aetiology

IHPS is a multifactorial sex-modified polygenic disease with athreshold model of inheritance, almost certainly with an envi-ronmental trigger

Until recently five candidate genes were implicated in thepathogenesis of IHPS The first of these is the nitric oxide synthasegene NOS1, and there is evidence of a lack of neuronal nitric oxide

in infants with IHPS The other IHPS candidate genes are alsothought to relate to smooth muscle function and regulation andone lies on the X chromosome These findings help to explain themale preponderance and the increased risk of an affected mothertransmitting the disease to her children: in order to have hadclinical IHPS she must have had a higher genetic ‘load’ of sus-ceptibility genes than a comparable affected male, and is thereforelikely to transmit the required genetic load to her children.IHPS has also been described in other genetic syndromes,such as Cornelia de Lange and Smith-Lemli-Opitz It also has ahigher incidence in children born with oesophageal atresia.Evidence for an environmental trigger comes from the factthat preterm infants develop IHPS 4e6 weeks after they are born,not at 44e46 weeks post-conceptual age The exact nature of thetrigger(s) is not known: suggestions include a prone sleepingposture and Helicobacter pylori infection

Whatever the cause, the smooth muscle hyperplasia soapparent in early infancy has been shown to regress spontane-ously later in life even if left untreated, and the pylorus resumes anormal appearance and function after several months The rea-sons for this are still not understood

In August 2013 a new genome-wide significant locus for IHPSwas found at chromosome 11q23.3 with a single-nucleotidepolymorphism (SNP) located 301 bases downstream of theapolipoprotein A-I (APOA1) gene suggesting the possibility of aninverse relationship between levels of circulating cholesterol inneonates and the IHPS risk This is an area for investigation.Diagnosis

The initial work-up of an infant with non-bilious vomiting is shown

inBox 2 The vomiting associated with IHPS is classically forceful,occurs after feeds and is described as projectile It gets progres-sively worse and the infant is hungry after vomiting ‘Coffeegrounds’ may appear in the vomitus as oesophagitis/gastritisdevelop Weight loss occurs as the disease progresses and it isimportant to review the growth charts and obtain a good feedinghistory (type of feed, amount, frequency) Urinary frequency andvolume reduces, such that parents note they are changing fewer,and less heavy, nappies Stool frequency is reduced

On clinical examination the child may show signs of dration or even shock There may be subcutaneous fat wasting,especially visible around the buttocks and cheeks Visible gastricperistalsis can be seen in up to half of cases As gastric peristalsishas a frequency of three per minute, the upper abdomen should

dehy-be observed for a few minutes The hypertrophied pyloric musclecan be felt in the upper abdomen This is described as the pyloricolive and is best felt during a test feed (Box 3)

Brian W Davies FRCS (Paed Surg) is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon at

Nottingham University Hospitals, UK Conflict of interest: none

declared.

Trang 27

Blood tests demonstrate the metabolic consequences of

repeated vomiting and dehydration as the disease progresses Hþ

and Clare lost in the vomitus, along with small amounts of Kþ

This leads to a hypochloraemic metabolic alkalosis Initially the

kidney will excrete Kþ in exchange for Hþ in an attempt to

maintain pH, but as fluid losses worsen aldosterone release is

stimulated and this promotes Naþreabsorption at the expense of

Hþ Furthermore, the relative lack of Clions in the urine leads

to HCO3 reabsorption with the Naþions, meaning that the urine

becomes paradoxically acidified It is important to appreciate that

in IHPS the potassium deficit is often pronounced Jaundice also

occurs in up to 5% of infants with IHPS, due to a deficiency of

glucuronyl transferase

Typically IHPS can be diagnosed on the basis of a good history

and clinical examination If the initial test feed is negative but a

strong clinical suspicion remains, repeated examination is often

helpful An ultrasound can be performed if there is doubt about

the diagnosis (Figure 1) Only exceptionally is there a role for an

upper gastrointestinal contrast study

Preoperative managementOnce a diagnosis of IHPS has been made the situation should beexplained to the parents and informed consent obtained It isessential to correct any metabolic disturbance before proceeding

to surgery, a process which typically takes 24e48 hours Even ifthe serum electrolytes are normal, the infant will have lost fluid

Figure 1 Ultrasound diagnosis of pyloric stenosis is based on both the appearance of the pylorus and its function Pyloric channel length and pyloric wall thickness are measured A channel length >16 mm and wall thickness is >3 mm is regarded as diagnostic The scan is a dynamic test and the presence or absence of the pylorus opening with gastric peri- stalsis and flow through the pyloric channel is also looked for The test needs to be performed by an experienced radiologist or sonographer as false positives do occur (measurement A ¼ length of pyloric channel; measurement B ¼ total width of pyloric muscle; measurement C ¼ thickness of muscle).

Diagnostic work-up of non-bilious vomiting in early

e Visible gastric peristalsis

e Palpable pylorus (test feed)

C Blood tests

 Full blood count

 Urea & electrolytes, including chloride and bicarbonate

 Capillary blood gas

 C-reactive protein/erythrocyte sedimentation rate and blood

cultures if sepsis suspected

C Urine tests e urine dipstick and culture

C Imaging e ultrasound of abdomen (if any doubt of diagnosis)

Box 2

How to perform a test feed

The best time to perform a test feed is when the infant has an empty stomach, as a full stomach can mask the palpable pyloric

‘olive’ This can be done by emptying the stomach with a gastric tube or by continuing the feed after the infant vomits The purpose of the test feed is primarily to calm the child and allow sustained palpation; increased gastric peristalsis, making the pylorus easier to palpate, is a secondary phenomenon.

naso-A towel is needed in case the infant vomits and to reassure the parents that you have listened to them The infant is held with the head on the parent’s left This allows the abdomen to be felt from the left hand side Attention is paid to the epigastric and right upper quadrant regions The liver in infants is frequently low lying and a conscious effort needs to be made to get underneath the liver edge, as the pylorus is often otherwise obscured The legs of the child can be supported and the hips flexed, which further re- laxes the abdominal wall musculature It is important to be ready and examining the abdomen prior to the feed commencing as sometimes the best opportunity to feel the hypertrophied pylorus

is in the first few swallows before the stomach fills.

 Urinary tract infection

 Septicaemia and meningitis

C Other (feed intolerance, gastroenteritis, inborn errors of

metabolism)

Box 1

Trang 28

and electrolytes and needs intravenous fluids Feeds should be

stopped and a nasogastric tube placed A method of calculating

the chloride deficit and therefore fluid requirements is given

in Paediatric fluid and electrolyte therapy guidelines on pages

599e602 of this issue, although administration of 0.9% saline

ml/kg/day will typically correct all deficits within the 24

e48-hour timeframe mentioned above Regular monitoring of serum

electrolytes and acidebase balance on capillary blood gases is

essential as surgery is delayed until these have returned to

normal

The infant’s haemoglobin needs to be checked once If this is

normal, then the infant does not require cross-matching as blood

loss should be minimal and transfusion exceptional

Operative managementThe operation needs a team who are operating on young infants

on a regular basis Attention to keeping the infant warm duringinduction, surgery and at the end of the procedure is essential.Ramstedt’s pyloromyotomy, may be performed through aright upper quadrant, circumumbilical or laparoscopic approach(Figures 2 and 3) Medical management alone using intravenousatropine has been used successfully but requires a prolonged(median 2 weeks) stay in hospital, which compares poorly to thetypical 24e48-hour postoperative stay with surgical treatment,thus tends to be reserved for the very rare infant where generalanaesthesia is contraindicated Endoscopic balloon dilatation hasalso been described but is rarely successful

Pyloromyotomy

c b

(a) Longitudinal section of pyloric stenosi s, showing areas needing close attention to prevent complications (b) The pylorus is stabilized between thumb

and forefinger and the serosa incised longitudinally (c) The muscle is split down to the mucosa, which can be seen to bulge outwards

Incomplete pyloromyotomy most likely at gastric end Prepyloric vein of Mayo marks distal extent

Pylorus is grasped between thumb and forefinger

Mucosa bulges into pyloromyotomy

Trang 29

In open surgery, the pylorus is delivered and stabilized between

thumb and forefinger This manoeuvre also invaginates the

duodenal mucosa and reduces the risk of inadvertent mucosal

perforation The pyloric serosa is then incised, the initial cut

deepened with a McDonald dissector and the muscle split to the

mucosa using an ‘up-tip-clip’ technique or a pyloric spreader The

prepyloric vein of Mayo marks the distal extent of the

pylo-romyotomy The adequacy of the muscle split can be confirmed

visually and by testing for independent movement of the two

halves Mucosal perforation can be tested for by carefully by

com-pressing the residual contents of the stomach towards the pylorus

and watching the mucosa distend Some surgeons recommend

insufflating the stomach with air, however this risks inadvertent air

embolism if the syringe is attached to an intravenous catheter

accidentally (this should not now be possible in the UK as

naso-gastric tubes and enteral syringes should not be compatible with

intravenous tubes) During the pyloromyotomy it should be

remembered that most mucosal perforations occur at the distal

duodenal end of the pylorus whilst incomplete pyloromyotomies

are commonly found at the proximal, gastric end (Figure 2)

Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is currently controversial

Ad-vocates cite better cosmetic appearances and reduced operative

times and inpatient stay; critics cite equally good cosmetic

ap-pearances with the circumumbilical approach and increased

complications, especially incomplete pyloromyotomy requiring

re-operation, in the laparoscopic group A meta-analysis of three

randomized controlled trials comparing different results has

recently been published It showed no significant differences in

complications or outcomes

Postoperative management

The aim of postoperative care is to allow the infant to return

home promptly whilst detecting any complications early enough

to treat them with as few sequelae as possible

Observations

Following general anaesthesia an infant is monitored with an

apnoea alarm and continuous SaO2 Hourly pulse and respiratory

rate and 4-hourly temperatures should be recorded

Pain relief

Following intraoperative opiates, paracetamol and local anaesthetic

infiltration, postoperative paracetamol (oral, rectal or intravenous)

is usually sufficient Occasionally oral morphine is required

Feeding

Postoperatively a number of complex feeding regimes have been

described to minimize vomiting and accelerate discharge

Ran-domized controlled trials have shown that normal feeding (‘ad

libitum’) is equally effective Our protocol is to start feeds at

6 hours postoperatively at half the normal volume, with the

second feed also at half volume Subsequent feeds are given at

full volume Since introducing this we have reduced the mean

postoperative length of stay to 36 hours after open umbilical

pyloromyotomy

Specific early complications

approach is used)

Mucosal perforatione 1% If noted intraoperatively, then this

is repaired, feeding delayed for 24 hours and the infant observedclosely If unrepaired the infant develops peritonitis Initially thesymptoms and signs are non-specific (unsettled, raised heartrate, not interested in feeds), but by 36 hours they become un-well, pyrexial, tachycardic, tachypnoeic, distended abdomen,erythema of abdominal wall and wound, and may have guarding.Resuscitation, intravenous antibiotics, emergency surgery andhigh dependency/intensive care are required

Wound dehiscence e 0.5% is rare and due to poor surgicaltechnique Immediate surgical repair is required

Incomplete pyloromyotomy requiring redo surgerye 0.4% It

is relatively common for infants to vomit postoperatively and thevast majority of case will settle in a few days as gastric ileus settles.Persistent vomiting lasting 5 days or more warrants investigation

to exclude an inadequate pyloromyotomy Ultrasound or an uppergastrointestinal contrast study may be necessary Co-existinggastro-oesophageal reflux is common in this age group and mayrequire further treatment (thickened feeds, pharmaceutical).Discharge

Once the infant is well, has normal observations and has ated two normal feeds they can be discharged home

toler-Follow-up and long-term outcome

At discharge, the infant’s health visitor is informed The infant’sweight should be checked weekly for the first 3e4 weeks toensure appropriate weight gain; if not then clinical assessment isrequired A routine hospital out-patient appointment is notnecessary, but the family need written information of how tocontact the surgical team should they have any concerns.Following pyloromyotomy the pyloric muscle hypertrophyresolves spontaneously and long-term sequelae are extremely

FURTHER READING

Crabbe DCG Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis In: Stringer MD, Oldham KT, Moriquand PDE, Howard ER, eds Paediatric surgery and urology: long-term outcomes 2nd edn Philadelphia: W B Saunders,

1998 Jia W-Q, Tian J-H, Yang K-H, et al Open versus laparoscopic pylo- romyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Eur J Pediatr Surg 2011; 21: 77 e81 Hall Nigel J, Pacilli Maurizio, Eaton Simon, et al Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: a double-blind mul- ticentre randomised controlled trial Lancet 2009; 373: 390 e8 This is a good paper to learn critical reading skills Although it is from a world famous institution, had a research ethics committee which stopped the trial early and it was published in a high impact journal,

it still raises more questions than it answered The trial was stopped

as the infants undergoing laparoscopic pyloromyotomy had a shorter time to full feed (by 5.5 hours), but the incidence of incomplete pyloromyotomy was 3% (3 of 87) Although this is not statistically significant in their study, it compares poorly to only 0.4% in a review of 1262 pyloromyotomies by paediatric surgeons (see Crabbe above)

Trang 30

Joana Lopes

Simon N Huddart

Abstract

Intussusception is the invagination of a segment of bowel into the distal

adjacent bowel Mostly it involves the distal ileum and proximal colon and

no lead point can be identified It is the most common cause of bowel

obstruction in infants and young children It typically presents in infants

between 2 months and 2 years of age with episodic severe colicky

abdominal pain, vomiting that progresses to being bilious, abdominal

distension, and bleeding per rectum which is classically described as

‘red-currant jelly’ stool If not diagnosed and treated promptly the pathology

will progress to bowel necrosis, sepsis and death.

Patients usually need resuscitation and stabilization before investigation

and definite treatment The diagnostic test of choice is an ultrasound scan of

the abdomen The first-line treatment is an air-reduction enema that will be

successful in 80% of cases Surgery with manual reduction of the

intussus-ception and possible bowel resection is reserved for cases presenting with

peritonitis, cases where a pathological lead point is identified, where

air-enema failed or where this procedure is complicated by bowel perforation.

KeywordsBowel obstruction; intussusception; redcurrant jelly

Introduction

Intussusception is defined as the invagination of a proximal segment

of intestine (intussusceptum) into the lumen of the adjacent more

distal segment of intestine (intussuscipiens) The intussusceptum

becomes the inner segment of intestine and the intussuscipiens the

outer segment of intestine in the intussusception

Intussusception leads to bowel obstruction and if untreated

necrosis of the incarcerated bowel It is the most common cause

of bowel obstruction in infants and young children

History

1674e Intussusception was first described by Paul Barbette from

Amsterdam The condition was invariably fatal

1830e The first successful surgery was performed by John

Wil-son, but the surgical mortality was more than 75%

Copenhagen best known for describing congenital megacolon

and pyloric stenosis, first described hydrostatic reduction The

diagnosis was clinical as radiographs were not available until

1895

1959e Treatment of intussusception with insufflation of airwas first described by Fiorito from Argentina

EpidemiologyThe incidence in the UK is 1.6e4 cases per 1000 live births with

a male-to-female ratio of 3:2 It typically presents in infantsbetween 2 months and 2 years of age and 50% of the casespresent between 3 months and 10 months of age and 65% of thecases before 1 year of age

There is a seasonal variation in incidence with peaks in Springand Winter corresponding to peaks in occurrence of rotavirusand adenovirus infections

Aetiology/pathophysiology

In 95% of cases the intussusception is ileo-colic, arising in thedistal ileum and passing through the ileo-caecal valve into theproximal colon In decreasing frequency of occurrence it can also

be ileo-ileal, caeco-colic, colo-colic and jejuno-jejunal

In 10% of cases a lead point (for example a polyp or mangioma) in the intestinal wall, driven by peristalsis in theadjacent intestine, drags its associated segment of intestine (theintussusceptum) into the distal bowel (the intussuscipiens)

hae-In primary or idiopathic intussusception (90% of cases) a leadpoint cannot be identified It is thought that these idiopathiccases might result from enlarged Peyer’s patches acting as a leadpoint Viral illnesses (upper tract respiratory infections andgastroenteritis) may be the cause for the hypertrophy of thelymphoid tissue Adenovirus and to a lesser extent rotavirus havebeen implicated in 50% of cases The typical presentationhappens at the age of weaning occurs raising the possibility thatimmune stimulation by newly introduced feeds may be a cause.Food allergies are also considered to be a possible cause ofprimary intussusception

The incidence of intussusception increased in the USA after theintroduction of a rotavirus vaccine in 1998 Studies showed that therisk increased 20e30-fold within 2 weeks following the first dose ofthe vaccine and three- to sevenfold within 2 weeks after the seconddose There was no increased risk after the 3rd dose or 3 weeks afterany of the doses As a result, the vaccine was withdrawn a year afterbeing licensed Two new vaccines against rotavirus were licensed inthe USA (in 2006 and 2008) These had pre-licensure trials thatspecifically evaluated the risk of intussusception and did not find it

to be increased Post-marketing surveillance is still ongoing A studythat included data on more than 800,000 doses of one of the vaccines

in the USA has not shown an increase in intussusception cases.Postoperative intussusception (1% of childhood intussuscep-tion) is another form of primary intussusception but a separateentity on its own It can happen following abdominal or thoracicsurgery, generally for malignancy, after retroperitoneal dissec-tion and after chemo- or radiotherapy It is usually ileo-ileal

It is unclear why the intussusception develops but the currentbelief is that it results from the proximal small bowel recoveringits peristalsis before the distal bowel and therefore being pushedinto the latter It may also be due to spasm or oedema of thebowel wall after surgery so acting as a lead point Or it could bedue to dysmotility

In secondary intussusception there is a pathological leadpoint Pathological lead points are more common outside the

Joana Lopes MRCS is a Specialist Registrar in Paediatric Surgery at

University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK Conflicts of interest: none

declared.

Simon N Huddart MA MBBS FRCS FRCS(Paed) is a Consultant Neonatal and

Paediatric Surgeon at University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK Conflicts

of interest: none declared.

Trang 31

typical age range with more than 20% seen in patients over 2

years of age They are also more commonly ileo-ileal

intussus-ceptions and can recur if not excised

Possible pathological lead points are listed in Box 1 and

associated conditions are listed inBox 2

The first consequence of intussusception is bowel obstruction,

the second is compromise of the intussuscepted bowel: the

intussuscipiens distends, the intussusceptum and its mesentery

are compressed, and there will initially be lymphatic and venous

outflow obstruction, bowel wall oedema, followed by arterial

obstruction and eventually bowel necrosis

occurs However, the natural history of the condition is to

progress to sepsis and death, unless it is recognized and treated

successfully

Presentation

Over 80% of patients have episodes of colicky abdominal pain

with screaming, drawing up the legs and pallor The episodes

recur every 10e20 minutes Around 80% of patients vomit This

may be early due to the pain or late due to obstruction when it

becomes bilious Around a third of patients pass blood per

rectum with what is classically described as ‘redcurrant jelly’

stool These are dark red mucoid clots that result from

compression of the mucous glands within the intussusceptum

therefore a later sign Most patients do not pass much stool after

they have emptied their colon since they are obstructed; however

up to 20% of patients may have had diarrhoea as a prodromal

illness Only one-third of patients have the triad of colicky

abdominal pain, vomiting and bloody stools

These are generally previously fit and well children, well

nourished and in good health If early in the disease process,

between attacks the child may appear deceivingly well or asleep

As the disease progresses, the child will become progressively

lethargic in between episodes of pain, progressively more

dis-tended due to ongoing obstruction, severely dehydrated and

shocked Fever is a late sign due to bowel necrosis and sepsis

In an episode of pain, the child may be difficult to examine,there may be audible peristaltic rushes and a mass may bepalpable or even visible if the child is thin anywhere in theabdomen The classic examination finding is that of a right upperquadrant sausage-shaped mass (present in 60e80% of cases).Dance’s sign is the appearance of a flat or empty right lowerquadrant due to the mobile caecum having vacated the right iliacfossa

Rarely, the intussusceptum can be felt on rectal examination

or can be seen prolapsing through the anus This needs to bedifferentiated from a rectal prolapse as reduction of intussus-cepted bowel misdiagnosed as a rectal prolapse could be lifethreatening If a lubricated tongue blade inserted along the side

of the protruding mass can be advanced more than 2 cm into theanus the diagnosis of intussusception should be considered.Postoperative intussusception tends to have an atypicalpresentation and it should be suspected in any children withprolonged or recurrent postoperative ileus Mostly it happensfrom 10 days to within a month post-surgery It is usually ileo-

obstruction are more frequent causes for bowel obstructionafter surgery, intussusception may not be diagnosed

InvestigationsImaging

An abdominal ultrasound scan (USS) is the preferred modality ofimaging to diagnose intussusception and often it will be the onlyimaging needed Its sensitivity and specificity approaches 100%with an experienced operator It may also distinguish betweenileo-ileal intussusception and ileo-colic intussusception guidingfurther treatment

The cross-sectional view of an intussusception on USS ischaracterized by the ‘target sign’ (Figure 1) e two concentricrings of low echogenicity separated by a ring of high echogenicityrepresenting the walls of the intussusceptum and intussusci-piens Longitudinally it is characterized by the ‘pseudo-kidneysign’ (Figure 2) e superimposed layers of low and high echo-genicity representing the oedema of the bowel walls Doppler can

be used to detect blood flow within the intussusception

Pathological ‘lead points’

Associated conditions seen with intussusception

C Peutz eJeghers syndrome e hamartous polyps act as

a lead point

C Henoch eSchonlein Purpura e submucosal haematomas act as a lead point Intussusception seen in approximately 3.5% of patients with Henoch eSchonlein purpura

C Cystic fibrosis e inspissated bowel contents act as a lead point Intussusception seen in approximately 1% of cystic fibrosis patients

C Coeliac disease

C Clostridium difficile colitis Note e Intussusception has been described in premature infants and has been postulated as a possible cause for small bowel atresia in neonates.

Box 2

627 Ó 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Trang 32

A plain abdominal X-ray is no longer the investigation of

choice but may have been taken and should be studied The

radiograph may show the features of bowel obstruction and may

give the impression of a mass (an area of paucity of bowel loops

or an opacity within a gas filled bowel loop) The target sign or

coiled spring sign is an area of concentric lucencies that

repre-sents a cross-sectional appearance of the invaginated mesentery

and bowel into the intussuscipiens The meniscus sign is a

cres-cent-shaped lucency in the colon that represents the outlining the

distal end of the intussusceptum by gas The right iliac fossa is

usually gas free However, the abdominal X-ray may be normal

A contrast enema is rarely required to make the diagnosis but

where the diagnosis is not clear, it may be diagnostic and

therapeutic

A pathological lead point should be considered in those over

2 years of age and those with recurrent intussusceptions An

ultrasound and a contrast study may help, but CT or MRI may be

necessary

Laboratory

Routine baseline blood tests need to be obtained Due to the

dehydration, blood electrolytes and renal function need to be

assessed and corrected if needed The blood loss associated with

intussusception rarely requires transfusion

Management

The management follows the advanced paediatric life support

(APLS) algorithms remembering that these children can present

in a very unwell state and need resuscitation before further

investigation or treatment

Severe abdominal distension and pulmonary aspiration ofgastric content can lead to respiratory compromise Bowelobstruction, dehydration and ill-understood associated auto-nomic changes in the vasculature can result in some childrenhaving profound circulatory compromise and requiring signifi-cant fluid resuscitation

The patient requires an appropriately sized and functionalnaso-gastric tube which is aspirated and then left on freedrainage for gastric decompression and secure intravenousaccess Sometimes supplemental oxygen and rarely endotrachealintubation are required

Fluid resuscitation may be needed to restore intravascularvolume with 0.9% normal saline or Hartmann’s given initially as

a 20 ml/kg bolus and then repeated up to two times if necessaryguided by monitoring with clinical reassessment to evaluate theresponse to treatment A blood transfusion might be needed ifhigh volumes of fluid are required and urinary catheterizationwould then be appropriate Hypothermia needs to be preventedwhilst patients are moved between different clinical areas (acci-dent and emergency/radiology suit/theatre/ward) Intravenousantibiotics (cefuroxime and metronidazole) should be started.Only stabilized patients can thereafter undergo furtherinvestigation and treatment

Radiological reduction

An air-reduction enema under fluoroscopic guidance performed

in accordance with the guidelines of the British Society ofPaediatric Radiologists is the treatment of choice Radiologicalreduction used to be performed with barium under fluoroscopicguidance for both diagnosis and treatment Water-solubleisotonic contrast has also been used as this does not carry therisks of barium peritonitis if intestinal perforation occurs Air-enemas have been shown to be as equally effective and ifperforation ensues contamination is not as extensive Thedisadvantage of air-reduction is the poorer visualization of thereduction and possible lead points and the risk of the develop-ment of a tension pneumoperitoneum

The procedure should only be undertaken once the child hasbeen resuscitated sufficiently

The absolute contraindications to radiological reduction areevidence of peritonitis or perforation and the identification of

a pathological lead point Relative contraindications are thepresence of an ileo-ileal intussusception (as they are more diffi-cult to reduce radiologically and have a higher incidence ofpathological lead points), a grossly distended abdomen andchildren above the age of 3 years as they may be too uncooper-ative for the procedure or maintain recollection of the eventswhich could be traumatic

Consent should be obtained for the procedure with discussion

of the risks of failure, perforation, tension pneumoperitoneum,cardiorespiratory collapse, need for emergency peritonealdecompression and surgery, and of course recurrence

The air-reduction enema takes place in the radiology suit withadequate resuscitation equipment and expertise (APLS-trainedstaff) available should the child deteriorate or arrest

The procedure should be performed by an experienced ologist and an experienced member of the surgical team needs to

radi-be present in order to manage the child if a tension peritoneum ensues

pneumo-Figure 1 Ultrasound scan showing ‘target sign’.

Figure 2 Ultrasound scan showing ‘pseudo-kidney sign’.

Trang 33

The child should be closely monitored throughout (heart

rate and pulse oximetry as minimum monitoring

require-ments) Antibiotics and opiate analgesia (usually as

intrave-nous morphine) are given before the start of the procedure

and naloxone should be available to be administered if

needed

A catheter is inserted into the child’s rectum The child is

immobilized, with the buttocks held together (in order to

achieve a tight seal around the catheter) The catheter is

attached to a pressure monitoring device, with a cut off at 120

mmHg

Under fluoroscopic control air is insufflated into the colon to

achieve a pressure of 80e100 mmHg This pressure is held for up

to 3 minutes in order to try and reduce oedema and then the

intussusception Intermittent fluoroscopic screening allows one

to assess the progress of reduction of the intussusceptum If the

first attempt fails the child should be allowed a rest before

a further attempt is made With subsequent attempts the pressure

increases up to a maximum of 120 mmHg Up to three attempts

are made Successful reduction is demonstrated by the free flow

of air into the distal ileum If doubt remains about the success of

the reduction (the IC valve may be too oedematous to allow air to

pass into the small bowel) then a repeat ultrasound scan may be

useful

Success rates are between 75 and 80% If symptoms have

been present for more than 48 hours the success rate is lower

If reduction is successful the child is kept nil by mouth for

12 hours before fluids are allowed If the child had opiate analgesia,

monitoring needs to be continued for a period of time as respiratory

depression may develop Antibiotics can be stopped at 24 hours if

the child is well and discharge is usually possible within 48 hours

If the procedure fails but the child is stable the procedure can

be repeated 2e4 hours later If the child is not clinically well then

surgery is necessary

Of note is the fact that recurrent intussusception can be

treated following the same principles as a first episode The

success rate for air-enema is the same as for a first presentation,

even if it previously failed and surgery was needed

The most significant complication of an air-reduction enema

is perforation of the bowel If this occurs the high pressure gas

within the colon escapes and causes a tension

pneumo-peritoneum, which may compress the inferior vena cava and lead

to cardiovascular collapse Immediate treatment is necessary

with insertion of a large-bore cannula into the abdomen to

release the pressure Definitive management is by laparotomy

The perforation can happen either under the form if a small

necrotic patch of bowel or a long linear tear along the

anti-mesenteric border of the bowel

Surgery

Surgery is performed if there is a contraindication to radiological

reduction or, if this was unsuccessful, if radiological reduction

created a perforation or the parents have refused to give consent

to an air-reduction enema

A transverse muscle-cutting incision is made on the

right-hand side of the abdomen, usually above the level of the

umbi-licus The intussusception is delivered (Figure 3) (it is

occa-sionally necessary to mobilize the colon to achieve this)

Moderate serous ascites may be found due to the obstruction

Once the edge of the intussusceptum is found this is gentlymanipulated back upstream Mild pressure can decrease theoedema and help with the manoeuvre Pulling the intussuscep-tum should not be attempted, as it is likely to cause tearing orperforation If the intussusception is reduced the bowel must beassessed for viability and to examine for a lead point It isimportant to realize that the first part of the intestine to invagi-nate and the last part to reduce may be particularly thickenedand indented This is commonly seen and is not a pathologicallead point and does not need resection

Inability to reduce the intussusception, concerns over theviability of the bowel or identification of a pathological leadpoint require a resection (needed in approximately one-third toone-half of cases) this might be a simple resection or a limitedright hemicolectomy with an end-to-end anastomosis or rarely

a diverting stoma depending on the condition of the bowel andchild

An incidental appendicectomy may be performed especially if

a lower incision has been selected

Postoperatively the child should have a naso-gastric tube inplace, receive adequate analgesia, fluids and antibiotics and bemonitored closely Normally it is possible to start oral fluids 12e

24 hours after once any ileus has settled Patients should only bedischarged when eating and stooling normally

Laparoscopy started being used for diagnostic purposes only.However its role in managing intussusception is evolving withsome surgeons are using it to attempt reduction only and ifunsuccessful they proceed to a laparoscopic-assisted procedure(by exteriorization of the bowel through a periumbilical incision)

or converting to open, but some centres are using laparoscopyeven if bowel resection is needed

The majority of surgeons will be using a three-port technique(one infraumbilical port, two ports on the left-hand side of theabdomen) An atraumatic bowel clamp is used to grasp theintussusceptum and an intestinal grasping forceps is used to holdthe caecum The caecum is then pushed away while pressure isapplied distal to the intussuscipiens

The main difference from the open technique is that traction

on the proximal bowel is usually required

Figure 3 Intraoperative picture of an intussusception that has been delivered.

629 Ó 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Trang 34

If diagnosed and treated promptly, the current prognosis of

intussusception is excellent, with patients having no long-term

complications

There is a 1% risk of perforation with air-enema reduction,

more likely if the history is long (>48 hours) Post-perforation

the main risk is respiratory compromise due to tension

pneu-moperitoneum that needs to be decompressed immediately, any

peritoneal contamination tends to be minimal

The recurrence rate is less than 5% In 30% of cases it occurs

within 24 hours, in 70% of cases within 6 months Recurrence is

less likely after surgical treatment

Intussusception has a mortality (<1%) with deaths associated

with a delay in diagnosis, inadequate fluid resuscitation,

inade-quate antibiotic cover and failure to recognize recurrent or

residual intussusception following reduction

FutureSlow hydrostatic reduction with saline enema under ultrasoundguidance has been reported in China with 95.5% of 5218patients having successful reduction and a perforation rate of0.17% with no mortality This method has the advantage of notrequiring radiation and might be an alternative to currentpractice The likely increased reduction rate may be due to thetime over which reduction takes place Oedema may be morelikely to resolve with gentle pressure applied over a longer timethan with the three short, sharp, high-pressure periods currently

FURTHER READING

Grosfeld JL Pediatric surgery 6th edn Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.

Trang 35

Anorectal anomalies and

Anorectal malformations are congenital anomalies caused by a failure of

the hindgut to open into an adequate position on the perineum They are

often associated with congenital anomalies in other systems A thorough

understanding of the anatomical aberration will allow surgical planning

and correction of the defect This article outlines the principle

consider-ations in diagnosis, early and definitive management of these defects.

Hirschsprung disease is a congenital anomaly caused by a failure of

development of the enteric nervous system and consequent absence of

ganglia Marked spasticity of the bowel and functional bowel obstruction

ensue This article discusses recognition, diagnosis, initial and definitive

management.

In both conditions sequelae include life-long incontinence

Optimiza-tion of long-term outcomes is therefore important and meticulous surgical

management in early life should be coupled with careful follow-up.

Keywords Aganglionosis; anorectal malformation; Duhamel procedure;

imperforate anus; PSARP; Soave procedure; Swenson procedure;

transi-tion zone; VACTERL associatransi-tion

Introduction

Anorectal malformations (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HD)

together constitute a significant part of paediatric colorectal

surgical practice Both are congenital anomalies caused by

anatomical (in the case of ARM) or physiological (in the case of

HD) aberrations that require meticulous surgical management

The sequelae of congenital anomalies are likely to affect a

neonatal patient for decades onwards and careful attention to

follow-up is required if long-term functional outcomes are to be

optimized

Anorectal malformations

An ARM is a congenital abnormality in which the terminalportion of the hindgut fails to open into the correct position onthe perineum or does so but with an inadequate calibre.The incidence varies between areas and is approximately

Spectrum of diseaseARMs fall into a spectrum in both males and females

Males: the spectrum of abnormalities and the relationship tween the hindgut and the urethra are illustrated inFigure 1.The most minor defect in a male is a perineal fistula Here, thehindgut opens onto the perineum but, since it is anterior to thenormal position, it is incompletely surrounded by sphincter Nextare malformations in which the hindgut terminates as a fistulainto the urethra This may be a recto-bulbar urethral fistula or arecto-prostatic fistula At the most severe end of the spectrum aredefects in which the hindgut ends in a fistula into the bladderneck (recto-bladder neck fistulae) or bladder (recto-vesical)

be-Of clinical importance is the anatomical relationship betweenthe hindgut and the urinary tract; for the recto-perineal fistulae,there is always some distance between the two structures Forthe other defects this is not the case For the recto-bulbar urethraand the recto-prostatic fistulae, not only do the hindgut andurethra lie in close proximity, they are almost parallel In thesepatients, the walls of the hindgut and the urethra effectivelyshare a ‘common wall’ which may extend for some distancenecessitating particular care in dissection The trajectory of thehindgut relative to the urinary tract for the recto-bladder neckfistulae tends to be more perpendicular and a common wall isless of an issue

In addition to this spectrum in males, there are some specialsituations worthy of mention:

 ‘ARM with no fistula’ This occurs when the hindgut isblind ended and is seen most frequently in Down syn-drome Although there is no fistula into the urethra, there

is often a common wall, as per recto-bulbar urethraldefects

 Stenosis Here the hindgut opens onto the perineumthrough the sphincters but is stenotic either at skin level(anal stenosis) or higher up at the level of the dentate(rectal stenosis)

 Bucket handle defect Here, the hindgut does not enter theurinary tract but lies just under the skin surface Theoverlying skin has a typical appearance in which themidline raphe becomes prominent (hence the namebucket-handle) This is similar to a perineal fistula.Females: the spectrum of abnormalities in females is illustrated

inFigure 2 At the minor end is the perineal fistula In keepingwith its male counterpart, the hindgut opens onto the perineumbut is incompletely surrounded by sphincter, and may also bestenotic

Since the introitus and vagina, rather than the urethra, lieanterior to the hindgut, the next most severe defects are therecto-posterior forchette fistula (in which the hindgut enters atthe posterior corner of the introitus) and the recto-vestibular

Jonathan Sutcliffe FRCS (Paed Surg) MD is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon

at the Leeds General Infirmary, UK Conflicts of interest: none.

Ian Sugarman FRCS (Paed Surg) is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon at the

Leeds General Infirmary, UK Conflicts of interest: none.

Marc Levitt MD FACS is a Consultant Paediatric Surgeon, Director of the

Colorectal Center for Children and Professor of Surgery, Cincinnati

Children’s Hospital and the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH,

USA Conflicts of interest: none.

Trang 36

fistulae (in which the hindgut enters introitus itself and so can be

seen at a point distal to the hymen) As with fistulae that enter

the urethra in males, there is often a common wall (here between

hindgut and the vagina) that makes delicate dissection essential

The most severe defect in females is a cloaca Here, not only

does the hindgut open directly into the vagina, but the urethral

orifice is also abnormal, lying high on the anterior vaginal wall

(‘female hypospadias’) In cloacae therefore, urinary, genital and

intestinal structures all drain into a common channel The point

at which these two structures open into the vagina may be

relatively close to the skin (producing a short common channel)

or may be much more proximal (producing a long common

channel) The length of the common channel correlates with

prognosis

Clinical presentation

Whilst ARMs are almost always clinically obvious when

inspecting the perineum at neonatal examination, the frequency

with which they are missed during the neonatal assessment is

surprisingly high In part this is because some abnormalities (e.g

recto-perineal fistulae or stenoses) have the potential to transmit

stool onto the newborn perineal skin If an unsuspecting clinician

fails to clean away this meconium then the defect will remain

undiagnosed A less common scenario occurs when the

abnor-mality lies at the level of the dentate line (for example rectal

stenosis) but the external structures look normal Delay in

diagnosis is however seen even at the most severe end of the

spectrum and one recent report from the UK demonstrated that

up to 50% of newborns with ARM were missed at the neonatal

examination.1

AssessmentOnce an abnormality has been identified, the primary objectivesare to:

 determine if a stoma is needed before definitive repair ornot

 look for associated abnormalities

Stoma or not? ARMs in which the position of the hindgut isclinically obvious and clearly separated from the urinary tract aredeemed ‘low’ and considered amenable to definitive repair in theneonatal period This effectively means recto-perineal fistulae

In contrast, defects at the severe end of the spectrum have aclose anatomical relationship between the hindgut and the uri-nary tract Furthermore, the distance of the hindgut from theperineal skin may be significant (indeed the hindgut may be sohigh that it cannot be reached safely from a perineal incision).Surgical exploration without a clear understanding of anatomy

in the neonatal period is hazardous This group of defects isdeemed to be ‘high’ and by definition requires a temporarystoma

Categorization of abnormalities into low and high can beperformed by clinical assessment alone in almost all patients If afistula is seen to enter the perineum, or a bucket handle isobserved, one can be sufficiently confident of the position of thehindgut to consider definitive repair if the baby is otherwise well

If meconium is seen in the urinary stream (this typically takes

24 hours or so) then a fistula is proven and a stoma required.Other clinical signs indicating a high abnormality are poorlyformed buttocks and perineal musculature, or a foreshortenedsacrum on plain X-ray

Figure 1 Recto-perineal, recto-bulbar urethral, and recto-bladder neck fistulae (From Pena A, Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations, 1989 With kind permission of Springer Science & Business Media.)

Figure 2 Recto-perineal, recto-vestibular and cloacal defects (From Pena A, Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations, 1989 With kind permission

of Springer Science & Business Media.)

Trang 37

In only a few neonates does sufficient doubt exist as to the

need for a stoma or not that radiology is needed The most useful

investigation is a prone lateral shoot through with a radio opaque

pellet applied carefully to the point where the anus might have

been expected A catch for the unwary is the need for sufficient

pressure upstream to a fistula for it to be delineated and the

examination is best performed at around 24 hours of age

In some centres, ultrasound has been used although this

re-quires particular experience on the part of the radiologist; too

much pressure on the perineum will compress tissues giving an

erroneous appearance of a low defect Other investigations such

as MRI are not recommended as the lack of pressure above a

fistula is likely to produce misleading but persuasive results

When required, formation of a stoma for ARM will allow the

child to decompress (and then feed) and also allows detailed

investigation of the anatomy of the ARM to inform surgical

plan-ning using a distal loopogram Here, water-soluble contrast is

instilled into the terminal portion of the hindgut from above via a

mucous fistula If sufficient pressure is applied to the contrast, it

will enter the urinary tract, demonstrating a fistula if present

Although cloacae are at the most severe end of the spectrum

they may be missed, or mislabelled as a recto-vaginal fistula In

reality, recto-vaginal fistulae are rare and are often cloacae in

which the urethral abnormality has not been recognised Since

surgical correction of cloacae often entails mobilization of the

urethra at the same time as the hindgut, and all cloacae require a

stoma, correct diagnosis is of practical importance

Associated anomalies: a well-recognized association is the

VACTERL association which is comprised of Vertebral

Ano-rectal, Cardiac, Tracheo-Oesophageal, Renal tract and Limb

ab-normalities The likelihood of these abnormalities co-existing

increases with the severity of ARM but even minor ARMs can be

affected

All babies should have spinal and sacral plain films, spinal

ultrasound (to look for evidence of bony anomalies or a tethered

cord), a full cardiology assessment, renal tract ultrasound and

limb examination The degree of sacral foreshortening can help

infer prognosis and is therefore an important clinical feature to

guide discussion with families

The presence of one congenital anomaly increases the

likeli-hood of others and a careful neonatal examination is needed

Cloacae, and to a lesser extent, any other ARM in a female may

be associated with gynaecological abnormalities such as bifid

uterus, vaginal septum or even vaginal agenesis.2 In cloacae,

collections of fluid in the uterus (hydrometrocolpos) are

some-times seen and may be so marked that ureteric compression and

renal impairment occurs Drainage of this fluid with a pigtail

catheter placed through the abdominal wall will usually address

this emergency

Other less common associated abnormalities include the

as-sociation of rectal or anal stenoses with an abnormal sacrum and

the development of a presacral mass (Currarino triad) For this

reason, MRI is recommended in these defects

Management

Neonatal placement of stoma: for those abnormalities deemed

to be high, a stoma is formed The placement of the stoma at the

junction of the descending colon and the sigmoid colon allows

enough proximity for contrast to be injected with sufficientpressure to demonstrates a urinary fistula but not so low that itimpedes surgical repair (Figure 3) This is the divided descendingcolostomy

Definitive surgical management: once the neonate has beenfully assessed clinically, had a stoma formed (if needed) andundergone a distal loopogram to delineate anatomy, definitivesurgery is undertaken The posterior sagittal anorectoplasty(PSARP), described by Pena in 1982,3involves a midline incisionthough the perineum Pelvic muscles and subtending innervationare already paired A midline incision minimizes further iatro-genic injury to these structures whilst at the same time allowingexcellent exposure

By using muscle stimulation throughout the dissection, thepaired musculature can be readily identified on both sides Aswell as seeing levator ani, sphincteric muscle is also seen to runparallel to skin at a superficial level (probably representingexternal sphincter) and then perpendicular to the skin (probablyrepresenting an extension up to the levator)

PSARP allows safe exposure of the hindgut and its meticulousdissection from the urethra where necessary, mobilization of anadequate length of bowel and precise placement of the ‘neoanus’within the sphincteric tissue with accurate re-apposition of pelvicmusculature (Figure 4)

For the most severe defects, the distal loopogram strates that the hindgut lies so high within the pelvis that itcannot safely be reached with a PSARP approach alone For thesepatients, the PSARP can be combined with an abdominalapproach Although an open approach through a Pfannenstielincision may be employed, a laparoscopic approach provides an

demon-Figure 3 Divided descending colostomy (From Pena A, Surgical ment of Anorectal Malformations, 1989 With kind permission of Springer Science & Business Media.)

Trang 38

excellent view into the pelvis and facilitates safe division of these

high fistulae Defects likely to benefit from this approach are

recto-bladder neck and high recto-prostatic, not only because the

fistulae are easily accessible from above but also because as

described above, the length of the common wall is short Such a

combined approach means that the PSARP incision need only be

long enough to allow an entrance to the peritoneum since a full

exploration is not required Precise placement of the neorectum

and neoanus within the sphincteric mechanism, and tacking of

the posterior wall to the sphincters, can then be performed

The laparoscopic approach has also been combined with a

pull through using a perineal laparoscopic port but this arguably

does not allow sufficiently accurate placement of the bowel

within the musculature, is often associated with prolapse and

risks injury to the urethra and distal ureters Pull though using a

port is no longer recommended by the current authors

One further consideration of laparoscopic ligation of the

fis-tula is the importance of not leaving a significant stump of

in-testinal tissue on the urinary tract Doing so predisposes to stone

formation, potential sepsis and, given the risks of long-term

exposure of colonic mucosa to urine, even malignancy.4

In most centres a programme of anal dilatations commences at

approximately 2 weeks postoperatively This reduces the

likeli-hood of cicatrization the circular wound at the point where the

neoanus is anastomosed to the skin Dilatations are undertaken by

the parents with support from nurse specialists and continued

until the faecal stream is rediverted to the perineum following

stoma closure This usually takes place after 6 weeks or so

Long-term outcome

Long-term outcomes now exist for this condition which

demon-strate that:

 Low abnormalities tend to be predisposed to constipation

although almost all are continent of both faeces and

urine

 Approximately 60e80% of patients with a high mality have impaired continence Management of thisscenario must be proactive If the child is to avoid theserious psychological consequences of soiling, symptomsshould be controlled before the child reaches school age Insome, control can be achieved by artificially thickening thestool with medication and/or dietary manipulation Inothers, rectal irrigations can be employed to empty thebowel fully once every 24 hours or some form of antegradecontinence enema procedure is performed such as aMalone procedure

abnor- Cloacae are worthy of particular mention; in addition to arelatively high risk of impaired continence, the degree andfrequency of associated urinary tract and gynaecologicalabnormalities is such that a multidisciplinary approach andinvolvement of experts in both urological and gynaeco-logical aspects is essential for good outcome The relativeinfrequency with which these abnormalities appear meansthat such a team does not always exist in every centre

 The long-term sequelae do not tend to improve ously with time In all patients, early detection andcorrection of symptoms is crucial

spontane-Hirschsprung diseaseHirschsprung disease (HD) is a congenital motility disorderaffecting the intestine It is characterized by an absence of gan-glion cells (aganglionosis) The role of ganglion cells is as a relaypoint for the enteric nervous system (ENS) and an absence leads

to spasticity of the bowel and functional obstruction The dence is about 1:5000 live births

inci-Spectrum of diseaseThe distribution of HD is such that the most distal part of therectum is always affected The length of the segment varies andalthough the proximal extent of aganglionosis most often lies

Figure 4 PSARP allows safe identification of the hindgut through a midline dissection Muscle fibres of sphincter complex are clearly seen Stay sutures have been placed on the hindgut wall to allow it to be safely opened, fistula identified and divided The hindgut can then be dissected away from the urinary tract (From Pena A, Surgical Management of Anorectal Malformations, 1989 With kind permission of Springer Science & Business Media.)

Trang 39

within the rectosigmoid (classic segment), it may involve the

whole colon (total colonic aganglionosis) and even small bowel

Above the aganglionic zone lies the transition zone (TZ) in

which ganglion cells are present but other ENS abnormalities are

still seen Above the TZ lies the ganglionic bowel Because of the

downstream functional obstruction, the ganglionic bowel is often

distended just above the TZ (Figure 5)

The eyes only see what the mind is prepared to comprehend

-Henri BergsonWhen Harald Hirschsprung first recognized this disease as an

entity he believed the obviously distended segment to be the

cause of symptoms Since this is the ganglionic segment, no

histological abnormality was found within it Although spastic,

the aganglionic segment looks almost normal in comparison to

the distended bowel above The aganglionic segment was not

recognized as the true cause of the problem for a further 60 years

This vignette underlines the need to think laterally when trying

to understand as yet unexplained disease processes

Clinical presentation

A majority of patients with HD present in the neonatal period

with a distal obstruction evidenced by abdominal distention,

bilious (i.e green) vomiting and delayed passage of first stool (or

meconium) Since more than 98% of term neonates will have

passed meconium within 24 hours, a delay beyond this in

conjunction in association with other clinical features is

consid-ered significant The risk of transmission to offspring is 1e33%

and varies with length of segment and gender of the index case.5

Since there is a degree of hereditability a positive family history is

sometimes seen and must always be sought

Other congenital abnormalities must be excluded on clinical

assessment, as there are a number of syndromes associated with

HD, most notably Down syndrome A small group of genetic

defects have now also been described including the RET

muta-tion Identification of a RET mutation raises the possibility of

multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2b (MEN 2b) and therefore

medullary thyroid cancer

HD may also be associated with enterocolitis characterized by

systemic sepsis, distention and offensive loose stool Although

some clinical features of enterocolitis are shared with infective

gastroenteritis, the severity and rapidity of progress are such that

this can be a lethal condition and must be considered as a

diagnosis in any child known to have HD or indeed in a newborn

presenting with these features

Once other differential diagnosis of a distal obstruction have

been excluded such as neonatal sepsis, missed ARM (see above),

intestinal atresia and meconium ileus, rectal washouts are

commenced using warm saline delivered though a soft rectal tube

and delivered by experienced staff As long as the volume instilled

on each washout (perhaps 50 ml) equates reasonably closely to

that returned there is no upper limit on the total volume of volume

of washouts to be used This technique produces adequate

decompression in most patients and has radically changed the

management of HD by reducing the need for a stoma

If severe enterocolitis is present, the segment is too long to

allow washouts, or in the relatively rare event that washouts fail

in classic segment disease, a stoma should be considered

Although in the recent past, stoma formation was considered thenorm following HD diagnosis, stomas are associated withfrequent complications and additional surgery They are to beavoided in HD where possible

A less common presentation is the older child with stipation Since the number of older children with constipationwithout an obvious cause is high, indications as to which of thesepatients require biopsy have been produced; patients with a his-tory of delayed passage of meconium, constipation from the firstfew days of life, a positive family history, previous enterocoliticsymptoms, failure to thrive and an explosive decompressionshould be considered as good indications in a constipated child.6Diagnosis and investigation

con-The gold standard is rectal biopsy For neonates, this minorprocedure can be performed on the ward, but with antibioticcover and consent Whilst an absence of ganglion cells is diag-nostic, the presence of thickened nerve trunks, staining brownwith acetylcholinesterase (AchE) is considered to be a furtherfeature supporting the diagnosis (Figure 5)

Anorectal manometry is said by some to be of value in thediagnosis but is insufficiently accurate and does not obviate theneed for biopsy A contrast enema is performed in the neonatalphase in some but not all centres Whilst it too does not reducethe need for biopsy, it can give information about the position ofthe TZ When the TZ is in the classic position i.e recto sigmoid,this investigation may help surgical planning If the whole of thecolon is affected, contrast enemas are notoriously misleading andmust be interpreted in the context of the clinical setting Onefurther benefit of the contrast enema is to inform the manage-ment of the rectal washouts by providing an estimate of thevolume needed to reach the distended bowel above the TZ.Definitive management

Following a period of washouts to reduce proximal distention,definitive surgery is performed This is typically undertaken after

4e8 weeks although in some centres this now takes place in theneonatal period Broadly there are three main operations incurrent use (Figure 6) In all procedures, the principles are toremove aganglionic bowel, to accurately identify and preservethe anal canal and to pull though the ganglionic bowel to a point

at or just above the dentate line

 Swenson procedure This was the first described procedureand involves the mobilization of the aganglionic colonfrom above the dentate line Dissection continues proxi-mally in a plane outside the serosa until distended bowel isreached Full-thickness biopsies are then sent to a waitingpathologist for frozen section If histological appearancesdemonstrate that a point above the TZ has been reached,this section of bowel is pulled through and anastomosed tothe dentate line and the abnormal bowel downstream isresected

This has become increasingly popular again in recentyears, especially in the USA, as previous concerns aboutpotential iatrogenic injury to the sacral outflow have beenaddressed with strict maintenance of a plane of dissectionimmediately on the serosa of the rectum This procedure isnow performed transanally with or without laparoscopicassistance (see below)

Trang 40

Ganglion cells

submucosa

mucosa

muscularis propria

Ngày đăng: 26/05/2017, 17:54

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN