Purposes of Cost Allocation To reduce frivolous use of common resources When managers are not charged for a service, they may tend to use it for frivolous or nonessential purposes
Trang 1Prepared by
Debby Bloom-Hill
Trang 3Purposes of Cost Allocation
To provide information for
Trang 4Purposes of Cost Allocation
Slide 6-4 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 5Purposes of Cost Allocation
Provide information for decision
making
When managers use a company
resource they are receiving a charge
for use
Allocated cost should measure the opportunity cost of using a company resource
Provides a useful benchmark
The closer to the opportunity cost of use, the better the allocation
Trang 6Purposes of Cost Allocation
To reduce frivolous use of
common resources
When managers are not charged
for a service, they may tend to
use it for frivolous or
nonessential purposes
Frivolous use may have hidden cost such as slower service
Allocation provides incentive for
departments to reduce frivolous
use
Slide 6-6 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 7Purposes of Cost Allocation
To encourage evaluation of
services
If costs are not allocated, there is
no incentive to evaluate the
services and look for lower cost
alternatives
With cost allocation, there is a
strong incentive to critically
evaluate the efficiency and
necessity of services
Users will certainly bring lower cost alternatives to the company’s attention
Slide 6-7 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 8Purposes of Cost Allocation
To provide “full cost” information
GAAP requires full costing for
external reporting purposes
Full cost information is needed
when the company has an
agreement whereby revenue
received depends upon cost
incurred
Also called “cost-plus” contracts
Slide 6-8 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 9All of the following are reasons
indirect costs are allocated to
products, services and departments,
except:
a To improve decision making
b To reduce frivolous use of
Indirect costs are allocated to provide full cost
Test Your Knowledge 1
Slide 6-9 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 10Cost-Plus Contracts
Slide 6-10 Learning objective 1: Explain why indirect
costs are allocated
Trang 11Process of Cost Allocation
Cost allocation is achieved by a
three step process
1 Determine the cost objective
2 Form cost pools
3 Select an allocation base to
relate cost pools to the cost objective
Trang 12Slide 6-12 Learning objective 2: Describe the
cost allocation process
Step 1 – determine the cost
objective
Determine the product, service,
or department that is to receive the allocation
The object of the allocation is
referred to as the cost objective
For example, if computer costs are allocated to contracts worked on, the contracts are the cost objectives
Process of Cost Allocation
Trang 14Slide 6-14 Learning objective 2: Describe the
cost allocation process
Process of Cost Allocation
Trang 15In the cost allocation process, the
cost objective is the:
a The allocation base used to allocate the
costs
b A grouping of individual costs whose
total is allocated using one allocation base
c The product, service or department
that is to receive the allocation
d None of the above
Answer: c
The product, service or department that is
to receive the allocation
Test Your Knowledge 2
Trang 16 Step 2 – form cost pools
A cost pool is a grouping of
individual costs whose total is allocated using one allocation base
Cost pools can be organized along
departmental lines or major activities, e.g equipment setups, inspections.
Costs in the pool must be
homogeneous (similar)
Slide 6-16 Learning objective 2: Describe the
cost allocation process
Process of Cost Allocation
Trang 17 Step 3 – select an allocation base that
relates the cost pool to the cost
objectives
The base must be some characteristic that
is common to all of the cost objectives
Deciding which base to use is not easy
The allocation should be based on a and-effect relationship
cause- Establishing cause-and-effect relationships
is not feasible when indirect costs are fixed
Accountants use other methods which are shown on the next slide
Process of Cost Allocation
Trang 18Fixed Indirect Costs – Other
More costs allocated to those
objectives that benefit most from incurring the cost
Ability to bear costs
More costs allocated to products,
services or departments that are more profitable
Equity approach to allocation
Base results in allocations that are
perceived to be fair or equitable
Slide 6-18 Learning objective 2: Describe the
cost allocation process
Trang 19Select an Allocation Base
Two production departments:
Assembly and Finishing
Both receive allocations of indirect
costs from the maintenance department
Should labor hours or machine hours
be used as the allocation base?
Trang 20Selecting an Allocation
Base
Selecting an Allocation
Base
Slide 6-20 Learning objective 2: Describe the
cost allocation process
Trang 21In the cost allocation process, an
allocation base:
a Must be some characteristic that is
common to all of the cost objectives
b Ideally should result in cost being
allocated based on a cause-and-effect relationship
Trang 22Allocating Service Department
Formed by service departments
Allocated to production departments
Slide 6-22 Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of
service department costs
Trang 23Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Slide 6-23
Allocate janitorial cost of $100,000
Allocation base: square feet
Assembly department: 20,000 square feet
Finishing department: 30,000 square feet
Calculate the allocation rate:
$100,000 / (20,000 + 30,000) = $2/sq ft
Allocation to production departments:
Assembly dept.: 20,000 sq ft x $2 =
$40,000
Finishing dept.: 30,000 sq ft x $2 = Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of
service department costs
Trang 24Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Slide 6-24
Allocate personnel cost of $200,000
Allocation base: number of employees
Assembly department: 60 employees
Finishing department: 40 employees
Calculate the allocation rate:
$200,000 / (60 + 40) = $2,000/employee
Allocation to Production Departments
Assembly dept: 60 x $2,000 = $120,000
Finishing dept: 40 x $2,000 = $80,000
Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of
service department costs
Trang 25Direct Method of Allocating
Service Department Costs
Direct Method of Allocating
Service Department Costs
Service department costs allocated to
production departments but not to other
service departments
Trang 26The direct method of allocating
costs:
a Allocates service department costs to
other service departments
b Allocates only direct costs
c Allocates service department costs to
production departments only
d Both b and c
Answer: c
Allocates service department costs to
production departments only
Slide 6-26 Learning objective 3: Discuss
allocation of service department costs
Test Your Knowledge 4
Trang 27Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Direct Method – Mason
Furniture
Trang 28Taylor Bath has three production
departments and allocates mailroom costs
of $600,000 based on number of employees
Showers: 80 employees
Bathtubs: 40 employees
Vanities: 30 employees
Calculate the mailroom allocation rate
The mailroom allocation rate =
Slide 6-28 Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of
service department costs
Test Your Knowledge 5
Trang 29Taylor Bath has three production
departments and allocates mailroom costs
of $600,000 based on number of employees
Showers: 80 employees
Bathtubs: 40 employees
Vanities: 30 employees
Use the allocation rate of $4,000 per
employee to allocate the mailroom costs to showers, bathtubs and vanities
Showers 80 employees * $4,000 rate =
$320,000
Bathtubs 40 employees * $4,000 rate =
$160,000
Vanities 30 employees * $4,000 rate =
Test Your Knowledge 6
Trang 30Allocating Budgeted and Actual Service Department
Costs
Allocating Budgeted and Actual Service Department
Costs
Management should allocate
based on budgeted rather than
actual costs
Allocation of actual amounts
allows service department to
pass on cost of inefficiencies and waste to production departments
Slide 6-30 Learning objective 3: Discuss allocation of
service department costs
Trang 31Problems with Cost
3 Allocation of fixed costs that make the
fixed costs appear to be variable costs
4 Allocations of manufacturing overhead
to products using too few overhead cost pools
5 Use of only volume-related allocation
bases
Trang 32Responsibility Accounting
and Controllable Costs
Responsibility Accounting
and Controllable Costs
One of the primary uses of managerial
accounting is to evaluate the
performance of managers and the
operations under their control
Evaluation is facilitated by a system which traces revenues and costs to units with
related responsibility for generating revenue and controlling costs
This system is referred to as a
responsibility accounting system
Slide 6-32 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Trang 33Responsibility Accounting
and Controllable Costs
Responsibility Accounting
and Controllable Costs
Cost allocation is generally required in
a responsibility accounting system
One unit is often responsible for the
costs incurred by another unit
Some allocations are not consistent
with a responsibility accounting
system
Managers should be held responsible
for controllable costs only
Controllable costs are affected by a manager’s decisions
Trang 34Arbitrary Allocations
Cost allocations are inherently
arbitrary
Typically there are numerous
allocation bases that are equally
Managers reject allocations which cast
an unfavorable light on their performance
Slide 6-34 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Trang 35Unitized Fixed Costs
The allocation process may make fixed costs appear to be variable costs
This happens when fixed costs are
unitized
Unitized fixed costs are stated on a per unit basis
When managers increase sales they
also increase their allocated general
and administrative costs
This could lead to decisions which could hurt the profitability of the company
Trang 36Lump Sum Allocations
Allocations of fixed costs can be made that they appear fixed to
managers
This is achieved by lump-sum
allocations of fixed costs
A lump-sum allocation is not affected
by changes in the activity level of the organizational unit
Lump-sum allocations generally should remain the same from year to year
Slide 6-36 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Trang 37When fixed costs are stated on a
per unit basis:
a Fixed costs are said to be controllable
b Fixed costs may appear to be variable
to managers receiving allocations
c A lump-sum allocation has been made
d Divisions with high sales receive a low
amount of allocated costs
Answer: b
Fixed costs may appear to be variable to
managers receiving allocations
Test Your Knowledge 7
Trang 38Too Few Cost Pools
Some companies assign overhead
to products using only one or two overhead cost pools
Although simple, this may lead to
distortion of cost allocation
Some products will be overcosted
Some products will be undercosted
This problem is solved by setting up separate cost pools for overhead
Slide 6-38 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Trang 39 Product costs will be more accurate
when more overhead cost pools are
used
Decisions that rely on product cost
information will be improved
However, more cost pools equals more expensive record keeping
Must analyze cost-benefit relationship
of more cost pools
Too Few Cost Pools
Trang 40Using Only Volume-Related
Allocation Bases
Using Only Volume-Related
Allocation Bases
Some firms allocate manufacturing
overhead based on volume, using
allocation bases like
Direct labor hours, or
Slide 6-40 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Trang 41Using Only Volume-Related
Allocation Bases
Using Only Volume-Related
Allocation Bases
The problem with the traditional
approach is that it assumes that all
overhead costs are proportional to
Trang 42Which of the following is not a related cost driver?
volume-a Direct labor hours
b Direct labor cost
in the production run
Slide 6-42 Learning objective 4: Identify potential
problems with cost allocation
Test Your Knowledge 8
Trang 43Activity-Based Costing
(ABC)
Activity-Based Costing
(ABC)
Using the ABC approach, companies
identify major activities that cause
overhead costs to be incurred
Some activities are related to
production volume, some are not
The cost of resources consumed
performing these activities are
grouped into cost pools
Costs are assigned to products using
a measure of activity referred to as a
cost driver
Trang 44The ABC Approach
Slide 6-44 Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based
costing (ABC) and cost drivers
Trang 45Relating Cost Pools to Products Using Cost Drivers
Relating Cost Pools to Products Using Cost Drivers
The company will estimate the total
cost assigned to each cost pool
The company will then decide on an
appropriate driver, such as number of
inspections for inspection costs
The company will then estimate the
activity in the driver
The overhead allocation rate is:
Trang 46Common Activities and Associated Cost Drivers
Common Activities and Associated Cost Drivers
Slide 6-46 Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based
costing (ABC) and cost drivers
Trang 47 McMaster Screen Technologies has two
products and allocates overhead costs
using a rate of $4 per dollar of labor.
One product has a very low gross profit
and the other has a very high gross profit
The CFO suspects that this may be due to
problems with the costing system
The CFO authorizes a study of how
product costs will change if an ABC
Trang 48 The study finds that overhead cost is
related to 7 drivers shown on the next
slide
The ABC approach reveals that the
high-volume product is very profitable
However, the selling price does not come
close to covering the full cost of the low
volume product
The CFO’s intuition that the traditional
product costing might be providing
misleading information is correct
Slide 6-48 Learning objective 5: Discuss activity-based
costing (ABC) and cost drivers
Activity Based Costing- McMaster Screen Technologies
Activity Based Costing- McMaster Screen Technologies
Trang 49Activity Based Costing- McMaster Screen Technologies
Activity Based Costing- McMaster Screen Technologies
Trang 50Power Electronics uses two cost pools
Test Your Knowledge 9
Learning objective 5: Discuss
activity-based costing (ABC) and cost drivers
Trang 51Power Electronics has two products:
Equipment setups 10 * $150 per setup = $1,500
Inspections 3 * $200 per inspection = $600
Total overhead $1,500 + $600 = $2,100
Test Your Knowledge 10
Trang 52Power Electronics has two products:
Equipment setups 40 * $150 per setup = $6,000
Inspections 8 * $200 per inspection = $1,600
Total overhead $6,000 + $1,600 = $7,600
Slide 6-52
Test Your Knowledge 11
Learning objective 5: Discuss
activity-based costing (ABC) and cost drivers