Stage 1: Initial Selection• Initial selection devices are used to determine if basic qualifications for the job are met • Devices include: – Application Forms • Good initial screen • Mus
Trang 1Robbins & Judge
Trang 2Chapter Learning Objectives
• After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
– Define initial selection and identify the most useful methods – Define substantive selection and identify the most useful
methods.
– Define contingent selection and contrast the arguments for and against drug testing.
– Compare the four main types of training.
– Contrast formal and informal training methods, and on-the-job and off-the-job training.
– Support the use of performance evaluation.
– Show how managers can improve performance evaluations.
– Explain how diversity can be managed in organizations.
– Show how a global context affects human resource
management.
Trang 3The Selection Process
Trang 4Stage 1: Initial Selection
• Initial selection devices are used to determine if basic qualifications for the job are met
• Devices include:
– Application Forms
• Good initial screen
• Must be careful about questions asked – legal issues
– Background Checks
• Most employers want reference information, but few give it out – litigation worries
• Letters of recommendation are of marginal worth
• May use criminal record or credit report checks
Trang 5Stage 2: Substantive Selection
• These devices are the heart of the selection process
• Based on job-related performance requirements
• Work Sample Tests
– Creating a miniature replica of a job to evaluate the performance abilities of job candidates
• Assessment Centers
– A set of performance-simulation tests designed to evaluate a candidate’s managerial potential
Trang 6Another Substantive Selection Device
• Interviews
– Are the most frequently used selection tool
– Carry a great deal of weight in the selection process
– Can be biased toward those who “interview well”
• Types of Interviews
– Unstructured (randomly chosen questions)
• Most common, least predictive, and prone to bias
– Structured (standardized sets of questions)
• More predictive of job success; less chance for bias
– Behavioral structured (asking how specific problems were handled in
the past)
• Past behaviors may be good predictors of future behavior
• Interviews most often used to determine organization-individual fit
Trang 7Stage 3: Contingent Selection
• Final checks before hiring
– Drug testing
• Controversial: perceived to be unfair or invasive
• Supreme Court ruled that this is not an invasion of rights
• Expensive but accurate
• Alcohol not generally tested for
Trang 8Training and Development Programs
• Types of Training
– Basic Literacy Skills
• One half of U.S high school graduates do not have the basic skills necessary for work
Trang 9What About Ethics Training?
Argument against
– Personal values and value
systems are fixed at an
– Training reaffirms the organization’s expectation that members will act
ethically
Trang 10Training Methods
• Formal
– Planned in advance with a structured format
• Informal
– Unstructured, unplanned, and easily adaptable
– 70% of all current training is of this type
Trang 11Individualized Training and Learning
Trang 12Evaluating Training Effectiveness
• Many factors determine training
ability, and high self-efficacy learn best
– Training climate: ability to apply the learning to the job
Trang 13Performance Evaluation
• Evaluation affects performance level
• Purposes of Performance Evaluation
– Provides input to general human resource decisions
• Promotions, transfers, and terminations
– Identifies skill training and development needs
– Provides performance feedback to employees
– Supplies the basis for reward allocation decisions
• Merit pay increases and other rewards
• For OB specialists: the key purposes of
performance evaluation are the last two - a
mechanism for feedback and reward allocation
Trang 14What Do We Evaluate?
• Individual Task Outcomes
– These are the metrics that directly result from employee effort such as sales, turnover, or quality
• Behaviors
– When direct results are difficult to determine, may be
evaluated on behavior and documented actions such as sales calls made, promptness in submitting reports, or
non-productive activities like volunteering for charity
drives
• Traits
– Weak because they don’t reflect productivity; often used these include attitudes, confidence, and looking busy
Trang 15Who Should Do the Evaluating?
• Immediate Supervisor
• Peers
• Subordinates
• Customers
• The person being evaluated
• 360o feedback: all these and more
Exhibit 18-2
Trang 16Methods of Performance Evaluation
Trang 17More Methods of Performance
Evaluation
• Graphic Rating Scales
– An evaluation method in which the evaluator
rates performance factors on an incremental scale
Keeps up with current policies and regulations.
Completely Unaware
Fully Informed
X
Trang 18Another Performance Evaluation
Method
• Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
– Scales that combine major elements from the critical incident and graphic rating scale approaches: The
appraiser rates the employees based on items along a continuum, but the points are examples of
actual behavior on a given job rather than general descriptions or traits.
Punctuality
• 1: Never late for work
• 2: Late 1-2 times per
month
• 3: Late 3 or more times
per month
Trang 19Even More Evaluation Methods
• Forced Comparisons
– Evaluating one individual’s performance relative to the
performance of another individual or others
– Who is “better,” A or B?
– Group Order Ranking
• An evaluation method that places employees into a particular classification, such as quartiles
• 10 % are A’s, 20 % B’s, 40 % C’s, 20 % D’s, and 10 % F’s
Trang 20Suggestions for Improving Evaluations
• Use multiple evaluators to overcome rater biases
– Halo and leniency errors
• Evaluate selectively based on evaluator competence
• Train evaluators to improve rater accuracy
• Provide employees with due process
– Individuals are provided with adequate notice of
performance expectations
– All relevant evidence of a violation is aired in a fair
hearing, with the individual given an opportunity to
respond
– Final decision is based on the evidence and is free of bias
Trang 21Providing Performance Feedback
• Why Managers Are Reluctant to Give Feedback
– They are uncomfortable discussing performance
weaknesses directly with employees
– Employees tend to become defensive
– Employees tend to have an inflated assessment of
their own performance
• Solutions to Improving Feedback
– Train managers how to give effective feedback
– Use performance review as a counseling activity
rather than as a judgment process
Trang 22Managing Diversity: Work-Life
Conflicts
• Since the 1980s the line between work and personal life has begun to blur
• Solutions include:
– Flexible scheduling and benefits
– On-site personal services (like dry cleaning or a gym)
– Time-, information- or money-based strategies available
• Stress is caused not by time constraints but the
psychological incursion of work into the family domain and vice versa
– Some like greater integration of work and family; others need greater separation
Trang 23Diversity Training
• Used to increase awareness and to examine stereotypes
• Participants learn to value individual
differences, increase cross-cultural
understanding, and confront stereotypes
Trang 24Global Implications
• Selection
– Practices differ by nation: global policies need to be
modified to fit within local customs
– Use of educational qualifications may be universal
• Performance Evaluation
– Not emphasized or considered appropriate in many
cultures due to differences in:
• Individualism versus collectivism
• A person’s relationship to the environment
• Time orientation (long- or short-term)
• Focus on responsibility
Trang 25Summary and Managerial Implications
• Selection Practices
– Proper selection devices increase likelihood of hiring the right person for the position
• Training and Development Programs
– Can be used to improve employee skills
– Increase employee self-efficacy
• Performance Evaluation
– A major goal is to assess an individual’s performance
accurately as a basis for reward allocation decisions
– Should be based on behavioral, results-oriented criteria, take a long-term view and allow employees input into the process
Trang 26All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher Printed in the United
States of America.
Copyright ©2009 Pearson Education,
Inc Publishing as Prentice Hall