08/2010 PUGH & COMPANY, Risk Assessment • Materiality… • Need to document basis for materiality • Need to document any changes in materiality that occur during the audit and how they we
Trang 1Auditing Overview for Employee
Benefit Plans
Trang 208/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Learning Objectives
Provide an overview of the audit process including :
Risk assessmentSignificant audit areasActuarial assumptionsSAS 70 reports
Terminating plans
Trang 308/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
– Objectives of risk assessment standards
• Understanding of the entity
• Assessment of risk
• Improve linkage between assessed risk and work performed
– Assessment process
• Continuous process - must occur throughout the audit
• Evaluation of audit findings (questions to ask throughout the process)
– Has audit risk been reduced to acceptably low level? – Has risk of material misstatement been reduced to an
acceptably low level?
– If the answer is no to either of these, the audit is not
complete.
Trang 408/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment Process
Procedures Performed
• Preliminary engagement activities.
• Inquiries of plan management and others.
• Preliminary analytical procedures.
• Observation and inspection.
• Discussion among the engagement team.
Understanding Obtained
• Industry, regulatory, and other external factors
• Nature of the plan.
• Objectives, strategies, and related business risks.
• Measurement and review of the plan's financial performance.
• Internal control.
• Selection and application of accounting policies.
• Fraud risk factors.
Decisions and Judgments Made
• Decisions at the Financial Statement Level:
– Materiality at the financial statement level.
– Materiality for particular items of lesser amounts.
– Risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level.
– Overall audit strategy.
• Decisions at the Account Balance, Transaction Class, and Relevant Assertion Level:
– Tolerable misstatement.
– Risks of material misstatement at the relevant assertion level, including identification of significant risks.
– Nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures (including tests of controls and substantive procedures).
Trang 508/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Materiality
– Based on economic conditions you might
expect a lower materiality level.
– Lower materiality levels may add additional
time to the job.
• Need to be efficient in selecting audit steps in the risk assessment process.
Trang 608/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Materiality…
• Need to document basis for materiality
• Need to document any changes in materiality that occur during the audit and how they were determined
– Contributions (special bonus/special
compensation)
• Need to document lower level of planning materiality for certain items
– Administrative expenses (declining
profitability of plan sponsor)
Trang 708/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding the Plan and Its Environment
– The Plan
• Review plan document
– Consider summarizing significant
information
• Document flow of information
– Plan sponsor – Record keeper – Custodian
– Trustee – Actuary
Trang 808/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding the Plan
• Records
– Where are they located?
– How do we gain access to the data?
• Specific plan investments
– Are there hard to value assets?
Trang 908/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding the Plan Sponsor’s industry
• Consider factors affecting the industry that could affect the plan
– Decreased sales – Increased costs – Layoffs
– Cash flow problems – Increase risk of bankruptcy
• Increase incentive to minimize expenses through
– Misallocation of required employer
contributions
– Misuse of forfeitures – Shifting plan administrative expenses
directly to plan
Trang 1008/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding Plan Sponsor
• Consider interviewing plan sponsor employees
– Owners – Key Management – Participant (especially in ESOP)
» Ask
What do they know about the plan?
How do they conduct transactions?
What are their expectations?
Should be done during fieldwork on financial statement audit when possible and
incorporated into fraud interview process
Trang 1108/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Interview dos and don’ts
– Dos
» Face to face interviews
» Interview personnel involved in all aspects of the plan’s operations
» Share hypothetical situation to initiate fraud discussion
Treatment of lost participants and the related fraud opportunities
How and frequency of contribution reconciliations
Don’ts
» Conduct the interview in the presence of other client employees
» E-mail questions to management
» Interview only the primary audit contact
» Ask only yes and no questions
Trang 1208/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding the Design and Implementation of Internal Controls
– Who is ultimately responsible for properly
implementing and operating an employee
benefit plan?
• The plan sponsor
– The responsibility of the plan can not be
passed to the service providers
– Implementation of appropriate
monitoring controls is critical where plan operations is outsourced
Trang 1308/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding Internal Controls
– Plan administration controls
• Determining plan provisions
• Establishment of the investment policy
• Authorization of certain transactions
• Monitoring and on-going evaluation of service providers
Trang 1408/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding Internal Controls…
– Entity level controls – who is in charge of the plan
• Monitoring (board of directors)
• Personnel (hiring, training, evaluations)
• Integrity and ethics (ethics policies)
• Segregation of duties (protection of assets)
Trang 1508/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding Internal Controls…
– Transaction level controls
• Forfeitures (currently a hot topic in the industry)
• Plan fees (currently a hot topic in the industry)
• Participant investment elections
• Transfers, mergers, new plan setups
Trang 1608/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Understanding Internal Controls…
– Unique control environment
• Important to understand and document who does what
• Significant controls may be outsourced to third parties
• Certain areas may have shared responsibilities
• A control at one entity might mitigate risk in another area (e.g vesting)
Trang 1708/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
allocations, and review investment losses?
• Can we rely on the participant to contribute to the internal control structure?
– They may not understand the internal control
Trang 1808/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Documentation of Internal Controls
– Identify individual audit areas and related
control objectives
• Consider classes of transactions
– Activity in participant’s account – Existence and occurrence
• Account balances
– Investments – Receivables – Payables
• Disclosures
Trang 1908/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Documentation of Internal Controls…
• Client memo and flowcharts
• Incorporate reference to SAS 70 controls when appropriate
– Verification through walkthroughs
– Consider flow of information between plan
sponsor and the service organization for each individual audit area and control objective
– Consider missing steps in the control process
Trang 2008/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Documentation of Internal Controls…
• Fraud
• Error
• Ask “what could go wrong”?
• Consider if you only had 8 hours to perform audit procedures - what would you want to do before you personally signed the opinion?
• Must be tailored to each plan – cannot rely on one discussion for all plans
• Consider the uniqueness of the various plans
Trang 2108/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Challenges of an Employee Benefit Plan Audit
– When assessing risk keep the following in
mind
• Many clients see the audit as a “necessary evil”
• Many plan sponsors do not have the policies and procedures in place or do not have them sufficiently documented
• Many plan sponsors that rely heavily on service providers may not be as rigorous in their procedures and oversight
• Overuse or underuse of the SAS 70
Trang 2208/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Policies and Procedures of the Plan Administrator Related
to the Service Organization
– Plan administrator should have an
understanding of what the service
organization does and what controls are in
place
• They should be reviewing the SAS 70 annually
Trang 2308/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Policies and Procedures …
– Reconciliation of participant accounts to
service organization records should be
performed on a timely basis
• Payroll information should be reconciled to the contribution records
– In total – By participant
• Reconciling census data provided to service organization
to appropriate payroll records
• The audit can not be the control
Trang 2408/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Policies and Procedures …
– Consider who has access to the data provided
to the service organization and the ability to make changes to override controls
• CFO/Controller
• Human resources
• Payroll
• IT
Trang 2508/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Risk Assessment
• Other Procedures of the Plan Administrator
– Document transactions that are approved
– Consider management points related to
significant deficiencies
Trang 2608/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Trang 2708/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Participant Data & Payroll
Objectives include determining:
• Whether all covered employees have been properly
included in employee eligibility records
• Whether accurate participant data for eligible employees
were supplied to the plan administrator and, if applicable, the plan actuary
Trang 2808/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Participant Data & Payroll
Types of data to be tested:
• Demographic – birth date, hire date
• Payroll data – wage rate, hours worked, earnings,
contributions to the plan
Trang 2908/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Participant Data & Payroll
Examples of substantive procedures
• Recalculate payroll for selected participants for one or
more pay periods
• Trace individual payrolls from the payroll journal to the
participants earnings records
• Review personnel files for hiring notice, pay rate, birth
date, termination date
Trang 3008/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Cash
• Typically small
– If held under a trust agreement or under an
insurance contract, confirmations are usually adequate
– If held independent of a trust agreement or
insurance contract, customary audit
procedures considered appropriate
Trang 3108/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Investments
• Limited Scope Audit
– Obtain and read a copy of the certification
– Determine whether the entity issuing the
certification is a qualifying institution under
DOL regs
– Compare the investment information certified
by the trustee or custodian to the information contained in the plan’s financial statements
and related disclosures
Trang 3208/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Investments
• If the auditor becomes aware that the certified
information my be incomplete or inaccurate the auditor should instruct the plan administrator to:
– Request that the trustee or custodian recertify or
amend the certification for such investments at their
appropriate year-end values or recertify or amend the certification to exclude such investments from the
limited scope certification or
– Instruct the auditor to perform full scope procedures on such investments excluded from the certification
• If not done auditor should consider modifying his
or her report
Trang 3308/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Investments
• Full Scope Audit
– Determine nature and location of investments from minutes, agreements with custodians,
advisors, etc.
– Obtain or prepare a schedule of investments showing beginning balance, purchases sales, ending balance
– Typical audit programs have specific
procedures depending upon the type of
investments held, such as mutual funds,
limited partnerships and derivative.
Trang 3408/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Investments
• Full Scope Audit (cont.)
– Confirm investments held by third-party
custodians
– Perform analytical procedures on average and ending balances
– Test fair value
– Test the calculation of unrealized gains and
losses
Trang 3508/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Stable Value Funds & GIC’s
GIC’s - Audit Considerations
• Obtain, read and evaluate the GIC contract
• Maturity dates, minimum crediting rates, rate resets.
• Is the contract fully benefit responsive?
– Contract is between plan and issuer The contract cannot be sold or assigned without consent of the issuer.
– Contract issuer must be obligated to (1) repay principal and interest, and (2) provide prospective crediting rate adjustments with an
assurance the crediting rate will not be < 0%
– Contract requires all participant-initiated transactions to occur at
contract value
– An event that limits the ability of the plan to transact at contract
value with the issuer and with the participants must be probable of not occurring
– The plan must allow participants reasonable access to their funds
• Confirm principal and income with Insurance
Company/Counterparty.
• Assess credit quality of the issuer.
• If a plan holds multiple contracts, each contract should be
evaluated individually.
Trang 3608/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Contributions Received and Receivable
• Typical analytical procedures include:
– Comparison to prior year
– Average per participant
• Trace to plan sponsor audited financial statements
• Vouch subsequent receipt
Trang 3708/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Contributions Received and Receivable
Timeliness of remitting participant contributions
Contributions must be remitted ASAP
• Failure to remit may be considered a Prohibited
Transaction
• 15th business day of following month is not a safe harbor
Trang 3808/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Benefit Payments
• Determine participant eligibility (request, approval)
• Recompute amount of benefit
• Vouch payment
• Typical analytical procedures include:
– Comparison to prior year
– Average per participant
– Other expectations
Trang 3908/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
• Allocation of investment income to be tested even for
limited scope audits
Trang 4008/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Investment Income
• Consider reasonableness by comparing current year income and yield to that in the prior year and to investment
reports from advisors, trustees, mutual fund companies
and to industry indexes or other expectations
• SAS 70 may be used to reduce but not eliminate scope of testing
Trang 4108/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Fees and Expenses
• Most defined benefit plans and many defined contributions plans pay administrative expenses out of plan assets
• Typically plan expenses are below materiality levels and
therefore are not subject to significant detailed testing
• Auditors should gain an understanding of what expenses are allowed by the plan
• Many times expenses paid out of plan assets are prohibited transactions
Trang 4208/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Commitments and Contingencies
• Discuss with client
• Review minutes of various committees
• Analyze legal expense
• Request audit inquiry from attorneys
• Obtain client representation
Trang 4308/2010 PUGH & COMPANY,
Actuarial Assumptions
• Trends and nature of benefit distributions
• Shift in plan population over time—turnover or retirement age
• Recent mergers or acquisitions could cause assumptions to
be inappropriate
• Plan benefit formula changes or a freezing of the plan
• Whether consistent gains/losses are generated each year