1. Trang chủ
  2. » Tất cả

Koo et al 2009

11 2 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 11
Dung lượng 1,92 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

The temperature variation results in significant impedance variations, particularly a frequency shift in the impedance, which may lead to erroneous diagnostic results of real structures,

Trang 1

Incorporating Effective Frequency Shift for Compensating

Temperature Effects

KI-YOUNGKOO,1SEUNGHEEPARK,2,* JONG-JAE LEE3ANDCHUNG-BANGYUN1,* 1

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Guseong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea 2

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Cheoncheon-dong, Jangan-gu

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea 3

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, Gunja-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Korea

ABSTRACT: This study presents an impedance-based structural health monitoring (SHM) technique considering temperature effects The temperature variation results in significant impedance variations, particularly a frequency shift in the impedance, which may lead to erroneous diagnostic results of real structures, such as civil, mechanical, and aerospace structures In order to minimize the effect of the temperature variation on the impedance measurements, a previously proposed temperature compensation technique based on the cross-correlation between the reference-impedance data and a concurrent impedance data is revisited In this study, cross-correlation coefficient (CC ) after an effective frequency shift (EFS), which is defined as the frequency shift causing two impedance data to have the maximum correlation, is utilized To promote a practical use of the proposed SHM strategy,

incor-porated with the current hardware system Validation of the proposed technique is carried out

on a lab-sized steel truss bridge member under a temperature varying environment It has been found that the CC values have shown significant fluctuations due to the temperature variation, even after applying the EFS method Therefore, an outlier analysis providing the optimal decision limits under the inevitable variations has been carried out for more systematic damage detection It has been found that the threshold level shall be properly selected considering the daily temperature range and the minimum target damage level for detection

It has been demonstrated that the proposed strategy combining the EFS and the outlier analysis can be effectively used in the automated continuous SHM of critical structural members under temperature variations

effects, effective frequency shift, cross-correlation coefficients, outlier analysis, steel truss members

INTRODUCTION

STRUCTURALhealth monitoring (SHM) has become

an important issue in many fields, such as civil,

mechanical, and aerospace engineering In recent years,

the electromechanical impedance method, which utilizes

piezoelectric materials as collocated actuator-sensors,

has emerged as a new SHM technique (Giurgiutiu and

Rogers, 1997; Giurgiutiu et al., 1999; Park et al., 2000,

2003a, 2005, 2006a; Soh et al., 2000; Tseng et al., 2000;

Zagrai and Giurgiutiu, 2001; Bhalla et al., 2002) In this

technique, a piezoelectric sensor is surface-mounted to

the host structure by means of a high strength epoxy

adhesive and its electrical impedance is extracted across

a high frequency-band, typically in the order of kHz The real part of this signature is used as a representation

of the local dynamic parameters of the structure in the vicinity of the sensor Damage to the structure in the vicinity of the sensor is expected to alter this signature thereby giving an indication of the imminent damage However, there are many impediments to the practical application of the technique for SHM of real structures, such as bridges, buildings, and airplanes The main challenge lies in achieving continuous monitoring of the impedance response of the piezoelectric sensor over sufficiently long periods; several days, months, or years

To this end, the development in terms of hardware and software systems has been pursued From the viewpoint

of hardware systems, the low-cost, portable, and wireless

*Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed E-mail: ycb@kaist.ac.kr

and shparkpc@skku.edu

Figures 1–18 appear in color online: http://jim.sagepub.com

JOURNAL OFINTELLIGENTMATERIALSYSTEMS ANDSTRUCTURES, Vol 20—March 2009 367

1045-389X/09/04 0367–11 $10.00/0 DOI: 10.1177/1045389X08088664

ß SAGE Publications 2009 Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore

Trang 2

telemetry requirements resulted in an on-board active

sensor system (Grisso and Inman, 2005; Mascarenas

et al., 2006; Park et al., 2006b) The on-board active

sensor system interrogates a structure utilizing a

self-sensing macro-fiber composite (MFC) patch and the

low-cost impedance measuring chip, and all the

struc-tural interrogation and data analysis are pursued in near

real-time at the sensor location From the viewpoint of

software systems, the development of an automated

algorithm suitable for continuous monitoring under

significant environmental variation especially

tempera-ture effects should be accompanied with the

corres-ponding hardware system Several studies have been

reported about the temperature variation effects on the

impedance measurement (Sun et al., 1995; Park et al.,

1999a,b; Bhalla et al., 2003) Sun et al (1995) used a

temperature compensation method based on

cross-correlation to correct the horizontal shift in the

impe-dance signature pattern Park et al (1999a,b) proposed

an impedance-based health monitoring technique under

a temperature varying environment considering the root

mean square deviations (RMSD) of the measured

sign-atures after introducing proper shifts in the horizontal

and vertical directions Bhalla et al (2003) also

inves-tigated the influence of the structure–actuator

inter-actions and temperature on the impedance signatures

In this study, the change of the impedance data under

temperature variation has been investigated using an

automated continuous monitoring system In order to

minimize the effect of the temperature variation on the

impedance measurements, the temperature

compensa-tion technique previously proposed by Park et al

(1999a) is revisited In this study, the authors utilize

cross-correlation coefficient (CC) with an effective

frequency shift (EFS) which is defined as the frequency

shift causing the concurrent impedance data to have the

maximum correlation with the reference-impedance

data The proposed technique was applied to health

monitoring of a lab-sized steel truss bridge member

under a temperature varying environment It has been

found that the CC values have shown significant

fluc-tuations due to the temperature variations, even after

applying the EFS method Therefore, an outlier analysis

providing the optimal decision limits under this

inevi-table variation has been carried out for more systematic

damage detection Herein, as the damage level increases,

the threshold level should be properly selected

consi-dering the daily temperature range and the minimum

target damage level for detection, and continuous

updating of the threshold level is inevitably required

Through an experimental study using a MFC sensor to

detect artificial cuts on a steel truss member, it has been

demonstrated that the proposed strategy combining the

EFS method and the outlier analysis can be applied to

the automated continuous SHM of critical structural

members under temperature variations

IMPEDANCE-BASED STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

In general, the impedance-based SHM technique utilizes small piezoelectric sensors, such as piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) and MFC sensors, attached to a structure

as self-sensing actuators to simultaneously excite the structure with high-frequency excitations and to monitor the changes in the measured impedance signature Since the piezoelectric sensor is bonded directly to the structure

of interest, the mechanical impedance of the structure is directly correlated with the measured electrical impe-dance of the piezoelectric sensor Figure 1 presents an idealized 1-D model between the piezoelectric sensor and

a host structure Then, the electromechanical impedance function of the coupled system can be represented as

a function of frequency as (Liang et al., 1994):

Ztotalð!Þ ¼ i!C 1  2

31

Zsð!Þ

ZAð!Þ þ Zsð!Þ

ð1Þ

where C is the zero-load capacitance of the piezoelectric sensor, 31 is the electromechanical coupling coefficient

of the piezoelectric sensor, ZS is the impedance of the host structure, and ZA is the impedance of the un-bonded piezoelectric sensor

Thus, by observing changes in the electrical impe-dance measurement of the piezoelectric sensor, assess-ments can be made about the integrity of the host structure (Giurgiutiu and Rogers, 1997; Giurgiutiu

et al., 1999; Park et al., 2000, 2003a, 2005, 2006a; Soh

et al., 2000; Tseng et al., 2000; Zagrai and Giurgiutiu, 2001; Bhalla et al., 2002) However, there are still many impediments to the practical application of the techni-que for SHM of real bridge and building structures, such

as the sensitivity of the impedance measurement to the temperature variation

CONTINUOUS IMPEDANCE MONITORING SYSTEM

In recent years, the use of wireless sensors and networks is becoming increasingly popular as a research

V =nsin(wt)

Piezo-sensor

K C M

I =isin(wt+f)

Figure 1 Idealized 1-D electromechanical modeling between

a piezoelectric sensor and a host structure (Giurgiutiu and Rogers, 1997).

Trang 3

topic for SHM system In particular, development of

a self-contained wireless sensor incorporating on-board

actuating/sensing, power generation, on-board data

processing/damage diagnostic, and radio frequency

(RF) technologies is strongly required With the current

trend of SHM heading towards unobtrusive

self-contained sensors, the approaches integrating MEMS

and RF telemetry-based active sensing systems on the

electromechanical impedance-based damage detection

technique have been investigated untiringly by several

researchers (Grisso and Inman, 2005; Mascarenas et al.,

2006; Park et al., 2006b) Grisso and Inman (2005)

developed an autonomous on-board wireless

impe-dance-based SHM system The on-board sensor system

interrogates a structure utilizing a PZT patch and the

low-cost impedance method, and all the structural

interrogation and data analysis are pursued in near

real-time at the sensor location Moreover, a wireless

telemetry that alerts the end user of any harmful changes

in the structure is combined Conventional impedance

analyzers, such as HP4294A for the electromechanical

impedance method are too expensive and too bulky,

which is not attractive for real world applications

To overcome these limitations, Mascarenas et al

(2006) devised an active sensor node, as displayed in

Figure 2, which consists of AD5933, a microcontroller

(ATmega128L), and a radio frequency (RF) transmitter

(XBee) AD5933 developed by Analog Device is a new

impedance measuring device of low cost, portable, and

readily combined with a wireless telemetry, as shown in

Figure 3, which costs only 150$ A PZT patch

inter-rogates a host structure by using a self-sensing technique

of the AD5933 All the processes including structural

interrogation, data acquisition, signal processing, and

damage diagnostic are performed at the sensor location

by the microcontroller And only damage diagnostic

result implying ‘damage’ or ‘no damage’ will be

tran-smitted to the end-user through the RF data

transmis-sion Finally, the LED light shows ‘green’ or ‘red’ color

according to ‘intact’ or ‘damage’ state, respectively

Park et al (2006b) validated the feasibility of the active sensing node through two kinds of example studies for corrosion detection on an aluminum beam and loose bolt inspection on a bolt-jointed structure

In this context, this study presents an automated continuous impedance monitoring system As a current laboratory test setup, commercial equipments including impedance analyzers and temperature measurement systems are supported via General Purpose Interface Bus (GPIB) which is the most common interface for measurement and control systems, and RS232C which is

a standard for serial binary data communication The impedance analyzer HP4294A is connected to a laptop computer through local area network (LAN), so that GPIB commands may be instructed and measurements may be received via telnet protocol A computer program developed in MATLABÕ language performs all the tasks of the continuous impedance monitoring: (1) scheduling and execution of each measurement task, (2) measuring the impedance and temperature through equipment automations, (3) displaying real time mea-surements and diagnosis results on the screen, and

Structure

P Z T AD5933

Active sensing node

Wireless sensor Network system

On-line wireless SHM (MFC + AD5933 + ATMega128L + XBee)

station

LED Indoor: 30 m

Outoor: 100 m 2.4GHz data link Tx

(RF)

Rx (RF)

Figure 2 An active sensor node for wireless impedance-based SHM system (Mascarenas et al., 2006).

Figure 3 A miniaturized impedance measuring device (AD5933).

Trang 4

(4) data archiving Using the current continuous

impe-dance monitoring system, the impeimpe-dance measurement

can be carried out automatically over sufficiently long

periods

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

Test Specimen and Test Setup

An experimental study was carried out to investigate

the feasibility of the proposed method for continuous

health monitoring using a MFC sensor on a steel truss

member under a temperature varying environment The

test specimen is a 1/8 scale model with a dimension of

150  150  530 mm3 for a vertical truss member of

Seongsu Bridge, Seoul, Korea, which caused the collapse

of the bridge in 1994 The specimen consists of two

segments with wide flange sections of different flange

thicknesses of 6 and 3 mm welded together as in Figure 5

A ‘d33-type’ MFC sensor of 28  14  0.02 mm3 was employed to detect three damage cases with an artificial cut with different lengths of 2, 4, and 8 mm sequentially inflicted at the same location on the welded zone of the specimen The MFC sensor was placed at a distance of

40 mm away from the cut on the outside surface of

a flange A thermocouple was also placed near the MFC sensor for temperature measurement The present experimental setup for the impedance-based SHM consists of a host structure, a MFC sensor, an impedance analyzer (HP4294A), a thermocouple, and a laptop computer equipped with the continuous impedance monitoring framework as shown in Figures 4 and 5 Impedance Variations due to Temperature Effects

Temperature effects on the impedance signature of the MFC sensor were investigated Figure 6(a) shows the measured impedance data on the intact structure during

a period over 10 days The temperature varied in a range

530 mm

6 mm Thermo-coupler

Thermo-coupler

Cut

Cut

40 mm

50 mm

150 mm

144 mm

3 mm

Figure 5 Test specimen, MFC sensor, and thermocouple.

Test specimen

Temperature measurement (TC-31K)

Impedance analyzer (HP4294A)

LAN connection

Labtop computer

(1) Scheduled excution (2) Automated measurement (3) Displaying real-time results (4) Data archiving

A continuous SHM program developed using MATLAB®

RS232C

Telnet protocol

to send GPIB commands and to receive measurements

Send commands and receive measurement

Figure 4 An automated continuous impedance monitoring system.

Trang 5

of 10.3–26.08C during the period Figure 6(b) shows

similar results for a damage case with a cut of 4 mm in

the middle of the welded zone of a flange, where the

temperature variation was in the range of 15.9–31.38C

The results show that the temperature variations caused

significant variations in the impedance signatures in

both the vertical and the horizontal axes Thus, the

impedance changes due to the temperature variations

could lead to erroneous diagnostic results about the

integrity of the structure Therefore, a damage-feature

selection strategy robust to the ambient temperature

variation is required in the impedance-based SHM for

real applications

Effective Frequency Shift by Correlation Analysis

As mentioned earlier, the impedance and temperature

measurements were carried out continuously during

a long period The total number of the measurements for

the baseline (intact) state is 700 Figure 7(a) shows the

first and the 338th impedance signatures (both for the

intact cases) measured at 22.6 and 10.38C, respectively Considerable variation with both vertical and horizontal shifts can be observed between two impedance signa-tures and the CC is found to be very small as 0.099

To compensate the impedance variation due to the temperature change of 12.38C, an EFS by the cross-correlation analysis is introduced in this study Herein, the EFS ( ~!) for an impedance data y(!) is defined as the shift corresponding to the maximum cross-correlation with the reference impedance data x(!) as:

max

~

~

!

1=NPN i¼1ðxð!iÞ xÞðy ið!i!Þ  ~ yÞ

XY

ð2Þ where x and y are the mean values of two impedance signatures of x(!) and y(!); and X and Y are the standard deviations Note that the EFS method may compensate the vertical shifts as well by subtracting the mean values from the original signatures Figure 7(b) shows the normalized impedance signature ^x338ð!Þ of

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4 Figure 6 Impedance variations due to temperature variations in a range of 10.3–31.38C (a) Intact cases, (b) Damage cases with a 4 mm cut.

× 10 4 90

100

110

120

130

140

Test#1 at 22.6 °C Test#338 at 10.3 °C

−2 0 2 4 6

Test#338 at 10.3°C

Frequency (Hz)

× 10 4 Frequency (Hz)

Figure 7 Impedance data for two intact measurements (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1).

Trang 6

Test #338 after an EFS along with the normalized

reference signature ^x1ð!Þof Test #1 as:

^

x1ð!Þ ¼ðx1ð! !Þ  ~ x1Þ

X 1X 338

^

x338ð!Þ ¼ðx338ð! !Þ  ~ x338Þ

X 1X 338

Excellent match between two signatures for the intact

case can be observed, and the maximum correlation

coefficient between two signatures after the EFS is

found to be as high as 0.986 Figure 8(a) shows two

impedance signatures for the same damage case with a

cut of 2 mm, measured at 25.88C (Test #763) and 20.28C

(Test #805) In the present case, the EFS was evaluated

by taking the signature of Test #763 as the reference

The maximum CC between two measurements increases

from 0.139 to 0.983 as the EFS introduces as in

Figure 8(b) Figures 9 and 10 show similar results for

damage cases with a cut of 4 and 8 mm, respectively

It has been found that the maximum CC for the same damage case increases remarkably after an EFS Cross-correlation-based Damage Detection using Effective Frequency Shift

The feasibility of the cross-correlation-based damage detection method using the proposed EFS was investi-gated for three damage cases with an artificial cut with different lengths of 2, 4, and 8 mm Narrow cuts with a width of 0.5 mm were sequentially inflicted in the middle

of the welded zone of a flange as shown in Figure 5 After a cut of 2 mm was inflicted, a series of impedance measurements was carried out under temperature variations in the range of 16.1–28.58C Typically, an impedance measurement at 22.68C (Test #951) for a case with a 2 mm cut is compared with the baseline (intact) impedance measurement at the same temperature (Test

#1) in Figure 11(a) A big difference can be observed between two impedance signatures, and the CC values

110

120

130

140

150

160

Test#763 at 25.8°C Test#805 at 20.2 °C

CC = −0.139

−2 0 2 4 6

Test#805 at 20.2 °C

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Max CC = 0.983

Figure 8 Impedance data for two damage cases with a 2 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #763).

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

Test#1116 at 22.6°C Test#1155 at 31.3 °C

−2 0 2 4 6 8

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Test#1116 at 22.6 °C Test#1155 at 31.3°C

Figure 9 Impedance data for two damage cases with a 4 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1116).

Trang 7

obtained are as low as 0.055 Figure 11(b) shows the

normalized impedance signature of Test #951 after an

EFS along with the normalized reference signature

(Test #1), which indicates that the maximum correlation

coefficient increased remarkably to 0.920 However, the

value is smaller than the maximum CC for two intact

cases (i.e., 0.986) shown in Figure 7(b) Figures 12 and

13 show similar results for larger damage cases with a 4

and 8 mm cut, respectively The maximum CCs with the

intact case (Test #1) after the EFS are found to be 0.851

(for a 4 mm cut) and 0.680 (for an 8 mm cut), which are

significantly smaller than the previous intact and small

damage cases

Figure 14(a) shows the CCs after the EFS for all

measurement cases with a cut of 2, 4, and 8 mm The

EFSs were evaluated by taking the signature of an intact

case (Test #1) as the reference It can be clearly observed

that the maximum correlation coefficient after the

EFS drops very rapidly with increasing damage level,

which indicates the effectiveness of the present CC-based damage detection method using the EFS For the purpose of comparison, three other damage measures for the impedance-based SHM were addition-ally considered: (a) maximum CCs without EFSs, (b) RMSD with EFSs, and (c) RMSD without EFSs Results of the additional analyses are displayed in Figures 14(b), 15(a) and 15(b) The RMSD values were evaluated as:

RMSDð%Þ ¼Xn

i¼1

ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

½ReðZi, 1Þ ReðZi, 0Þ2

½ReðZi, 0Þ2

s

100 ð4Þ

where Zi,0 is the impedance function at !i for the baseline case, Zi,1is a concurrent impedance at !i, and

n is the number of frequency points A large value of RMSD means stronger indication of damage occurrence

in the concurrent case with respect to the baseline case

100

150

200

250

300

350

Test #1466 at 28.4 °C Test #1522 at 21.7 °C

−2 0 2 4 6

3.15 Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

CC = 0.013

Test#1522 at 21.7°C

Max CC = 0.983

Figure 10 Impedance data for two damage cases with an 8 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1466).

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

Test#1 at 22.6°C Test#951 at 22.6°C

−2 0 2 4 6 8

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Test#1 at 22.6 °C Test#951 at 22.6°C

Figure 11 Impedance data for an intact case and a damage case with a 2 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1).

Trang 8

3.05 3.1 3.15

80

100

120

140

160

180

−2 0 2 4 6 8

Test#1 at 22.6°C Test#1116 at 22.6 °C

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

CC = −0.045

Test#1 at 22.6°C Test#1116 at 22.6 °C

Max CC = 0.851

Figure 12 Impedance data for an intact case and a damage case with a 4 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1).

80

100

120

140

160

180

Test#1340 at 22.6 °C

−2 0 2 4 6 8

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

Frequency (Hz) × 10 4

CC = −0.101

Test#1 at 22.6 °C

Test#1340 at 22.6°C Test#1 at 22.6°C

Max CC = 0.680

Figure 13 Impedance data for an intact case and a damage case with an 8 mm cut (a) Original impedance signatures, (b) Normalized impedance signatures after EFS (Reference: Test #1).

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

0

10 15 20 25 30 35

10 15 20 25 30 35

−0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

Test no.

Test no.

8mm cut 4mm cut 2mm cut

Intact 2 mm cut 4 mm cut 8 mm cut

Figure 14 Cross-correlation coefficients for all cases with respect to Test #1 (a) After the effective frequency shift, (b) Before the effective frequency shift.

Trang 9

Figures 14(b) and 15(b) present the maximum CCs

and RMSD results without applying the EFSs, while

Figures 14(a) and 15(a) show the results incorporating

the EFSs In the case of the RMSD-based method, the

EFSs correspond to the minimum RMSDs after the

shift It is noted that both CC-based and RMSD-based

methods without the EFSs did not provide good damage

diagnostic results, while both results with the EFSs

showed successful damage detections even under

tem-perature varying environment The general performance

of the CC-based and RMSD-based methods with the

respective EFSs is found to be equally good

DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER

ANALYSIS

Outlier Analysis

An automated damage diagnostic system without

requiring any a priori mathematical model of the

structure, may provide an efficient SHM tool for real

structures In order to satisfy this requirement, a

so-called ‘novelty detection’ outlier analysis method

has emerged as a robust unsupervised learning pattern

recognition tool for damage detection of structures

(Worden et al., 2000; Park et al., 2003b) The outlier

analysis aims to establish simply whether or not a new

pattern is significantly different from the previous

patterns, at the same time automatically ignoring any

negligible differences, such as random fluctuations due

to noise That is, an outlier is an observation that is

significantly different from the rest of the population

and therefore the outlier is believed to be generated by

an alternate mechanism (Barnett and Lewis, 1994)

Assuming a multivariate normal distribution (MVN)

of sample patterns, the deviation of the candidate

outlier (x), from the rest of the population can be measured by Mahalanobis square distance (MSD) measure, given by:

D& ¼ ðx&ÞT1ðx&Þ ð5Þ

where  is the mean of the samples,  is the covariance matrix of the samples, and D is a deviation measure For the SHM applications,  and  are exclusively computed from the measurement for the baseline system without including potential outliers The deviation mea-sure Dis then compared with the threshold value Dth Herein, if D4Dth, xis an outlier, which means xcame from a damaged state The basic concept of this outlier analysis is illustrated in Figure 16 The threshold value depends on both the number and the dimension of the data set To investigate the effect of the dimension and the size of the data set, a Monte Carlo method is used to

0

0

50

100

150

10 15 20 25 30 35

10 15 20 25 30 35

0 50 100 150 200 250

Test no.

Test no.

2 mm cut

4 mm cut

8 mm cut

Figure 15 Root mean square deviations for all cases from Test #1 (a) After the effective frequency shift, (b) Before the effective frequency shift.

Dth

Out-Dimensional decision boundary

D V

if V >Dth then x Vis outlier!

x Vcame from a damaged state.

Outlier, x V

Figure 16 Multivariate outlier analysis (novelty detection).

Trang 10

arrive at a threshold value First, Xn which is a m  p

(dimension of data  number of observations) matrix of

the measurements is constructed as:

Xn¼ ½x1, x2, x3, , xp

xi: input measurement vector: ð6Þ

For this study, the input vector xiis taken as the CC

values calculated using Equation (2) Then, the MSD is

computed for all xias

diðxi, Þ ¼ ðxiÞT1ðxiÞ i ¼1 p ð7Þ

where  and  are estimated from Xn The maximum

MSD among diis selected and stored as

Di¼max

The previous steps are repeated n times to have a large

population of Di, and the probability distribution

fun-ction (PDF) of Diis empirically estimated The

thresh-old value Dthcan be established from the estimated PDF

for a prescribed confidence level, as shown in Figure 17

Damage Detection using Outlier Analysis

The optimal threshold values for more systematic

damage detection considering the fluctuations in the CC

values were investigated with a statistical confidence

level (C.L.) of 99.5% through an outlier analysis In this

analysis, all the CC values before each damage step were

utilized as the basis data to update the threshold level of

the outlier analysis The results are shown in Figure 18

As expected, it has been found that after each cut

damage of 2, 4, and 8 mm is inflicted, the CC values

dropped abruptly under the corresponding threshold

values (thr1: 0.942, thr2: 0.884, and thr3: 0.807), so that

reliable SHM and systematic damage detection may be

achieved under a temperature varying environment by

the present impedance-based method However, it is

noted that the threshold levels shall be properly selected

considering the daily temperature range and the

mini-mum target damage level for detection, and continuous

updating of the threshold level is needed as more data

are available

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of the impedance-based structural health monitoring (SHM) technique to diagnose the integrity of the structures has been investigated under the temperature varying environment The temperature variation resulted in a significant variation in the impedance measurement, particularly a frequency shift

in the impedance, which may lead to erroneous diagnostic results regarding the integrity of real tures including civil, mechanical, and aerospace struc-tures In order to minimize the effects of the temperature variations, a previously proposed temperature compen-sation technique based on cross-correlation between the reference-impedance data and a concurrent impedance data is revisited In this study, the cross-correlation coefficient (CC) with an effective frequency shift (EFS), which is defined as the frequency shift causing two impedance data to have the maximum correlation, was utilized To promote a practical use of the proposed SHM strategy, an automated continuous monitoring framework using MATLABÕ has been developed and incorporated with the current hardware system The proposed techniques were applied to health monitoring

of a lab-sized steel truss bridge member with the maximum temperature variation of 218C From the experimental study, it has been found that the EFS method may significantly reduce the temperature varia-tion effects on the damage detecvaria-tion However, the CC values have still shown significant fluctuations even after applying the EFS method Therefore, an outlier analysis has been also employed to determine proper threshold levels for more systematic damage detection considering the fluctuations in the CCs The results of the present experimental study demonstrated that the proposed impedance-based automated SHM technique incorpor-ating the EFS and the outlier analysis can be effectively used for diagnosing the structural integrity, even with the presence of temperature variations

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0

0

0

−2 2 4 6 8 10 Repeat n times to get

the distribution of D i

99.5%

confidence level

Take D i = max d i

Dth i

Figure 17 Establishment of threshold through outlier analysis.

0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05

10 15 20 25 30 35

Test no.

8 mm cut

4 mm cut

2 mm cut

thr1 = 0.942

thr2 = 0.884 thr3 = 0.807

Figure 18 Damage detection through the outlier analysis.

Ngày đăng: 26/11/2016, 14:13

w