1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

OB11 chapter 09 understanding word teams

20 235 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 20
Dung lượng 0,9 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Explain the growing popularity of teams in organizations.. Team Versus Group: What’s the DifferenceTeam Versus Group: What’s the Difference Work Group A group that interacts primarily t

Trang 1

o r g a n i z a t i o n a l b e h a v

i o r

stephen p robbins

e l e v e n t h e d i t i

o n

Trang 2

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

S T E P H E N P R O B B I N S

E L E V E N T H E D I T I O N

Chapter 9

Understanding Work Teams

Trang 3

After studying this chapter,

you should be able to:

1 Explain the growing popularity of teams in

organizations.

2 Contrast teams with groups.

3 Identify four types of teams.

4 Specify the characteristics of effective teams.

5 Explain how organizations can create team

players.

6 Describe conditions under which teams are

preferred over individuals.

Trang 4

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Why Have Teams Become So Popular

 Teams typically outperform individuals.

 Teams use employee talents better.

 Teams are more flexible and responsive to

changes in the environment.

 Teams facilitate employee involvement.

 Teams are an effective way to democratize and

organization and increase motivation.

Trang 5

Team Versus Group: What’s the Difference

Team Versus Group: What’s the Difference

Work Group

A group that interacts primarily

to share information and to

make decisions to help each

group member perform within

his or her area of responsibility

Work Team

A group whose individual efforts

result in a performance that is

greater than the sum of the

individual inputs

Trang 6

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Comparing Work Groups and Work Teams

E X H I B I T 9–1

Trang 7

Types of Teams

Problem-Solving Teams

Groups of 5 to 12 employees from the

same department who meet for a few

hours each week to discuss ways of

improving quality, efficiency, and the

work environment

Self-Managed Work Teams

Groups of 10 to 15 people who take

on the responsibilities of their former

supervisors

Trang 8

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Types of Teams (cont’d)

• Task forces

• Committees

Cross-Functional Teams

Employees from about the same hierarchical level,

but from different work areas, who come together

to accomplish a task

Trang 9

Types of Teams (cont’d)

Team Characteristics

1 The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues

2 A limited social context

3 The ability to overcome time and space constraints

Team Characteristics

1 The absence of paraverbal and nonverbal cues

2 A limited social context

3 The ability to overcome time and space constraints

Virtual Teams

Teams that use computer

technology to tie together

physically dispersed

members in order to

achieve a common goal

Trang 10

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

A Team-Effectiveness

Model

A Team-Effectiveness

Model

E X H I B I T 9–3

Trang 11

Creating Effective Teams

Trang 12

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Trang 13

Key Roles

of Teams

Key Roles

of Teams

Trang 14

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Trang 15

Creating Effective Teams (cont’d)

Trang 16

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Effects of Group Processes

+

=

E X H I B I T 9–4

Trang 17

Creating Effective Teams: Diversity

Group Demography

The degree to which members of a group share a

common demographic attribute, such as age, sex,

race, educational level, or length of service in the

organization, and the impact of this attribute on

turnover

Cohorts

Individuals who, as part of

a group, hold a common

attribute

Trang 18

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Turning Individuals Into Team Players

 The Challenges

historically valued individual achievement.

 Shaping Team Players

cooperative efforts while continuing to recognize

individual contributions.

Trang 19

Teams and Quality Management

 Team Effectiveness and Quality Management

Requires That Teams:

corrective action.

needed.

Trang 20

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc

Beware: Teams Aren’t Always the Answer

 Three tests to see if a team fits the situation:

perspectives?

goals for the group that is larger than the aggregate of the goals for individuals?

tasks?

Ngày đăng: 18/11/2016, 12:21

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN