1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

Dessler ch 6 rec planning and testing

52 440 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 52
Dung lượng 616,5 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Examples of Web Sites Offering Information on Tests or Testing Programs – Information from Kaplan test preparation on how various admissions tests work.. How to Validate a Test cont’d•

Trang 1

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc.

All rights reserved.

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook

The University of West Alabama

t e n t h e d i t i o n

Gary Dessler

Chapter

Chapter 6 6 Part Part 2 2 Recruitment and Placement

Employee Testing and Selection

Trang 2

After studying this chapter,

you should be able to:

After studying this chapter,

you should be able to:

1. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.

2. Explain how you would go about validating a test.

3. Cite and illustrate our testing guidelines.

4. Give examples of some of the ethical and legal

considerations in testing.

5. List eight tests you could use for employee

selection, and how you would use them.

6. Explain the key points to remember in conducting

background investigations.

1. Explain what is meant by reliability and validity.

2. Explain how you would go about validating a test.

3. Cite and illustrate our testing guidelines.

4. Give examples of some of the ethical and legal

considerations in testing.

5. List eight tests you could use for employee

selection, and how you would use them.

6. Explain the key points to remember in conducting

background investigations.

Trang 3

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–3

Why Careful Selection is Important

employees

part on subordinates having the right skills and

attributes

• EEO laws and court decisions related to nondiscriminatory selection procedures

• The liability of negligent hiring of workers with questionable backgrounds

Trang 4

Avoiding Negligent Hiring Claims

or her employment application.

and carefully check references.

or who have conviction records for offenses directly related and important to the job in question.

know,” especially when you discover damaging information.

Trang 5

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–5

Basic Testing Concepts

Reliability

person when retested with the identical or

equivalent tests

Test validity

on measures what it purports to measure or fulfills the function it was designed to fill

it to measure?

Trang 6

Sample Picture Card from Thematic Apperception Test

How do you interpret this picture?

Trang 7

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–7

Types of Validity

Criterion validity

the test (predictors) are related to job

performance (criterion)

• Are test scores in this class related to students’

knowledge of human resource management?

fair sample of the tasks and skills actually needed for the job in question

• Do the test questions in this course relate to human resource management topics?

• Is taking an HR course the same as doing HR?

Trang 8

Examples of Web Sites Offering Information

on Tests or Testing Programs

– Information from Kaplan test preparation on how various

admissions tests work.

– One of many firms offering employment tests.

Trang 9

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–9

How to Validate a Test

job success

Trang 10

How to Validate a Test (cont’d)

• Actual scores on the test with actual performance

of employees

Trang 11

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–11

Expectancy Chart

Figure 6–3

Note: This expectancy chart shows the relation between scores made on the Minnesota Paper Form Board and

rated success of junior draftspersons Example: Those who score between 37 and 44 have a 55% chance of being

rated above average and those scoring between 57 and 64 have a 97% chance.

Trang 12

Testing Program Guidelines

Trang 13

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–13

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Aspects of Testing

the job (validity)

minority or nonminority subgroups (disparate

impact)

selection devices, including interviews,

applications, and references.

Trang 14

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

Aspects of Testing (cont’d)

Testing alternatives if a selection device has disparate impact:

does not have an adverse impact

is a valid predictor of performance on the job

impact

Trang 15

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–15

Sample Test

Figure 6–4

Source: Courtesy of NYT Permissions.

Trang 16

Test Takers’ Individual Rights and Test

Security

Association’s standard for educational and

psychological tests, test takers have the right:

results

the scores will have access to them

Trang 17

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–17

Using Tests at Work

as specific job skills and work demands increase

• Screen out bad or dishonest employees

• Reduce turnover by personality profiling

Trang 18

Computer-Interactive Testing

Trang 19

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–19

Trang 20

Types of Tests (cont’d)

Tests of motor abilities

dexterity, manual dexterity, and reaction time

Tests of physical abilities

strength, body coordination, and stamina

Trang 21

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–21

Problem from the Test of Mechanical Comprehension

Figure 6–5

Which gear will turn the same way as the driver?

Source: Reproduced by permission Copyright 1967, 1969 by The Psychological Corporation, New York, NY All rights

reserved Author’s note: 1969 is the latest copyright on this test, which is still the main one used for this purpose.

Trang 22

Measuring Personality and Interests

inventories to measure basic aspects of an

applicant’s personality, such as introversion,

stability, and motivation

Trang 23

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–23

The “Big Five”

– The tendency to be sociable, assertive, active, and to experience

positive effects, such as energy and zeal

Trang 24

Other Tests

compare the person’s current interests with those

of others now in various occupations so as to

determine the preferred occupation for the

individual

learned—“job knowledge” in areas like accounting, marketing, or personnel

Trang 25

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–25

Other Tests (cont’d)

testing processes

Trang 26

Work Samples

performance

applicant’s performance on actual basic job tasks

Trang 27

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–27

Example of a Work Sampling Question

Figure 6–6

Trang 28

Work Simulations

asked to perform realistic tasks in hypothetical

situations and are scored on their performance

Trang 29

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–29

Work Simulations (cont’d)

scenarios, each followed by a multiple choice

question that requires the candidate to choose

from among several courses of action

that video-based situational tests can be useful for selecting employees

Trang 30

Work Simulations (cont’d)

approach

job’s tasks, and then are evaluated on their

performance

demonstrates that he or she can learn and

perform the sample of tasks will be able to learn and perform the job itself

Trang 31

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–31

Background Investigations and Reference Checks

applicants

Trang 32

Reference Checking Form

(Verify that the applicant has provided permission before conducting

reference checks)

Candidate Name:

Reference Name: Company Name:

Dates of Employment: (From: and To:)

Position(s) Held: Salary History:

Reason for Leaving:

Explain the reason for your call and verify the above information with the supervisor (including the reason for leaving)

1 Please describe the type of work for which the candidate was responsible.

2 How would you describe the applicant’s relationships with coworkers, subordinates (if

applicable), and with superiors?

3 Did the candidate have a positive or negative work attitude? Please elaborate

4 How would you describe the quantity and quality of output generated by the former employee?

5 What were his/her strengths on the job?

6 What were his/her weaknesses on the job?

7 What is your overall assessment of the candidate?

8 Would you recommend him/her for this position? Why or why not?

Trang 33

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–33

Background Investigations and Reference Checks (cont’d)

Trang 34

Background Investigations and Reference Checks (cont’d)

(and Buckley Amendment of 1974)

Trang 35

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–35

Background Investigations and Reference Checks (cont’d)

Trang 36

Making Background Checks More Useful

for applicants to sign explicitly authorizing a background check.

information from references.

a source for other references.

Trang 37

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–37

Using Preemployment Information

Services

prohibit the use of such information in employee screening

on someone’s arrest record as unfairly

discriminatory

itself preclude someone from getting a job

Trang 38

Checking Background Information

be requested and obtain written authorization

that the employer will comply with the federal and state legal requirements

the applicant or employee if adverse action is

contemplated

Trang 39

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–39

Checking Background Information

(cont’d)

applicant with copies of the investigative reports and a “reasonable period” has elapsed, the

employer may take an adverse action

Trang 40

Collecting Background Information

of workers’ compensation claims”).

Trang 41

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–41

Collecting Background Information (cont’d)

from the applicant.

checks of such things as involvement in lawsuits, and of

articles about the candidate in local or national newspapers.

check.

Figure 6–8 (cont’d)

Source: Adapted from Jeffrey M Hahn, “Pre-Employment Services: Employers Beware?”

Employee Relations Law Journal 17, no 1 (Summer 1991), pp 45–69; and Shari Caudron,

“Who are you really hiring?”, Workforce, November 2002, pp 28–32

Trang 42

The Polygraph and Honesty Testing

changes in emotional state that accompany lying

conducting polygraph examinations of all job

applicants and most employees

devices including psychological stress evaluators and voice stress analyzers

Trang 43

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–43

Permitted Users of the Polygraph

Justice)

economic loss or injury to an employer’s business

Trang 44

Paper-and-Pencil Honesty Tests

applicants’ proneness to dishonesty and other

forms of counterproductivity

of others who steal, acceptance of rationalizations for theft, and admission of theft-related activities

Trang 45

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–45

Antitheft Screening Procedure

Listen, rather than talk.

Test for drugs.

conduct searches.

Trang 46

personality traits

Handwriting Exhibit Used by Graphologist

Trang 47

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–47

Physical Examination

examinations:

requirements of the position

take into account in placing the applicant

applicant’s health for future insurance or

compensation claims

unknown to the applicant

Trang 48

Substance Abuse Screening

Trang 49

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–49

Substance Abuse in the Workplace

Trang 50

Complying with Immigration Law

Post 9/11

United States.

form to certify that they are eligible for employment.

information about the documents on the verification form, and sign the form.

employment of the individual, whichever is longer.

Trang 51

© 2005 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 6–51

Figure 6–9

HR Scorecard for Hotel Paris International Corporation*

Note: *(An abbreviated example showing selected

HR practices and outcomes aimed at implementing the competitive strategy, “To use superior guest services to differentiate the Hotel Paris properties and thus increase the length of stays and the return rate of guests and thus boost revenues and

profitability”)

Trang 52

Key Terms

negligent hiring reliability

test validity criterion validity content validity expectancy chart interest inventory work samples

work sampling technique

Ngày đăng: 14/11/2016, 15:28

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN