1. Trang chủ
  2. » Giáo án - Bài giảng

Finance management cengage 2013 chapter 012

39 241 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 39
Dung lượng 1,24 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis Relevant Cash Flows Incorporating Infla

Trang 1

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Cash Flow Estimation and Risk

Analysis

Relevant Cash Flows Incorporating Inflation

Types of Risk Risk Analysis

Chapter 12

12-1

Trang 2

Proposed Project

– Equipment: $200,000

– Shipping and installation: $40,000

– Inventories will rise by $25,000

– Accounts payable will rise by $5,000

– New sales: 100,000 units/year @ $2/unit

– Variable cost: 60% of sales

Trang 3

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Proposed Project

– Economic life: 4 years

– Depreciable life: MACRS 3-year class

– Salvage value: $25,000

12-3

Trang 4

Determining Project Value

– Calculating annual operating cash flows.

– Identifying changes in net operating working capital.

– Calculating terminal cash flows: after-tax salvage value and return of NOWC.

Initial OCF 1 OCF 2 OCF 3 OCF 4

Terminal CFs FCF 0 FCF 1 FCF 2 FCF 3 FCF 4

Trang 5

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Initial Year Investment Outlays

Trang 6

Determining Annual Depreciation Expense

Due to the MACRS ½-year convention, a 3-year asset is

depreciated over 4 years.

Trang 7

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Project Operating Cash Flows

Trang 8

Terminal Cash Flows

= $54.7 + $35

= $89.7

Trang 9

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Terminal Cash Flows

Q How is NOWC recovered?

Q Is there always a tax on SV?

Q Is the tax on SV ever a positive cash flow?

12-9

Trang 10

Should financing effects be included in cash flows?

included in the analysis

account by discounting cash flows at the WACC of 10%.

“double counting” financing costs.

Trang 11

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Should a $50,000 improvement cost from the

previous year be included in the analysis?

and should not be considered.

investment.

12-11

Trang 12

If the facility could be leased out for $25,000 per

year, would this affect the analysis?

possible annual cash flow of $25,000, which is an opportunity cost to be charged to the project.

Trang 13

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

If the new product line decreases the sales of the firm’s

other lines, would this affect the analysis?

“externality.”

to this project.

complements) or negative (substitutes).

12-13

Trang 14

Proposed Project’s Cash Flow Time Line

I/YR = 10%.

NPV = -$4.03 IRR = 9.3%

MIRR = 9.6%

Payback = 3.3 years

0 -260

(Thousands of dollars)

Trang 15

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

If this were a replacement rather than a new project,

would the analysis change?

equipment purchased.

old to the new situation.

change with the new equipment.

receive the SV at the end of the machine’s life This

is the opportunity cost for the replacement project.

12-15

Trang 16

What are the 3 types of project risk?

Trang 17

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

What is stand-alone risk?

independently.

coefficient of variation).

projects and investors’ diversification among firms.

12-17

Trang 18

What is corporate risk?

projects, i.e., diversification within the firm.

standard deviation and its correlation with the returns on other firm projects.

Trang 19

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

What is market risk?

and it considers both corporate and stockholder diversification.

12-19

Trang 20

Which type of risk is most relevant?

projects, because management’s primary goal is shareholder wealth maximization

customers, suppliers, and employees, it should not

be completely ignored.

Trang 21

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Which risk is the easiest to measure?

often focus on stand-alone risk when making capital budgeting decisions.

correct, but it does not necessarily lead to poor decisions.

12-21

Trang 22

Are the three types of risk generally highly

correlated?

its core business, stand-alone risk is likely to be highly correlated with its corporate risk.

• In addition, corporate risk is likely to be highly

correlated with its market risk.

Trang 23

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

What is sensitivity analysis?

in a variable on the project’s NPV

fixed at their expected values, except for the variable in question which is allowed to fluctuate

12-23

Trang 24

What are the advantages and disadvantages of

sensitivity analysis?

– Identifies variables that may have the greatest potential impact on profitability and allows management to focus on these variables.

– Does not reflect the effects of diversification.

– Does not incorporate any information about the possible magnitude of the forecast errors.

Trang 25

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Evaluating Projects with Unequal Lives

repurchased If WACC = 10%, which is better?

Trang 26

Solving for NPV with No Repetition

projects, and enter I/YR = 10%.

Trang 27

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Replacement Chain

4-year life, the common life is 4 years.

NPV B = $6,641.62 (on extended basis)

-50,000 34,000 27,500

-50,000 34,000 27,500

-22,500

12-27

Trang 28

Equivalent Annual Annuity

annual payment that the project would provide if it were an annuity.

Trang 29

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

If expected inflation equals 5% is NPV biased?

Trang 30

Project Operating Cash Flows, If Expected

Inflation = 5%

Op costs (60%) -126 -132 -139 -146 – Depreciation -79 -108 -36 -17

– Taxes (40%) 2 -8 23 32

+ Depreciation 79 108 36 17 EBIT(1 – T) + DEP 82 96 70 65

Trang 31

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Considering Inflation:

Project CFs, NPV, and IRR

(Thousands of dollars)

70.0 96.1

82.1 -260

FCFs

Trang 32

Perform a Scenario Analysis of the Project, Based on

Changes in the Sales Forecast

estimates, except unit sales The actual unit sales are expected to follow the following probability distribution:

Case Probability Unit Sales

Trang 33

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Scenario Analysis

under each scenario can be determined.

Trang 34

Determining Expected NPV, σ NPV , and CV NPV from

the Scenario Analysis

0 15

$

) 8 57 ($

25 0 ) 0 15 ($

5 0 ) 8 27

$ -(

25 0

E(NPV)

=

+ +

=

3 30

$

] ) 0 15

$ 0.25($57.8

) 0 15

$ 0.5($15.0 )

0 15

$ 8

[0.25(-$27

1/2 2

2

2 NPV

=

− +

− +

= σ

2.0 0

$30.3/$15.

CV NPV = =

Trang 35

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

If firm’s average projects’ CV NPV range is 1.25-1.75, would this project have high, average, or low risk?

• With a CV NPV of 2.0, this project would be classified

as a high-risk project.

proper analysis.

12-35

Trang 36

Is this project likely to be correlated with the firm’s business? How would it contribute to the firm’s overall

risk?

firm’s aggregate cash flows

• As long as correlation is not perfectly positive (i.e.,

ρ ≠ 1), we would expect it to contribute to the lowering of the firm’s overall risk

Trang 37

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

If the project had a high correlation with the

economy, how would corporate and market risk be

affected?

affected However, when combined with the project’s high stand-alone risk, correlation with the economy would suggest that market risk (beta) is high.

12-37

Trang 38

If the firm uses a +/-3% risk adjustment for the

cost of capital, should the project be accepted?

(due to high stand-alone risk), the NPV of the project is -$2.2.

use a 7% cost of capital and the project NPV is

$34.1.

Trang 39

© 2013 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

What subjective risk factors should be considered before a decision is made?

sources of risk for a project.

• If the project has the potential for a lawsuit, it is

more risky than previously thought

project may be less risky than otherwise thought.

12-39

Ngày đăng: 14/11/2016, 14:50

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

TÀI LIỆU CÙNG NGƯỜI DÙNG

  • Đang cập nhật ...

TÀI LIỆU LIÊN QUAN