A059 LRFD bridge design manual

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN ii 2.4 Final Bridge Plans and Special Provisions ..... MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-3 The Bridge Office is responsible for conducting all bridge and s

LRFD Bridge Design Manual

B R I D G E O F F I C E

MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Bridge Office

LRFD Bridge Design Manual

MANUAL

5-392

ii

M n / D O T B R I D G E O F F I C E

LRFD Bridge Design Manual

Minnesota Department of Transportation

3485 Hadley Avenue North • Mail Stop 610

Oakdale, MN 55128-3307 Phone: 651/366-4500 • Fax: 651/366-4497

JULY 2003 OCTOBER 2003 JANUARY 2004 APRIL 2004 OCTOBER 2004

DECEMBER 2004 FEBRUARY 2005 MARCH 2005 NOVEMBER 2005 MARCH 2006

APRIL 2006 MAY 2006 AUGUST 2006 OCTOBER 2006 FEBRUARY 2007 JUNE 2007

JULY 2007 OCTOBER 2007

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN i

1.1.3 Format of Manual References 1-2

1.2 General Bridge Information 1-2

1.3.1 Checking of Mn/DOT Prepared Bridge Plans 1-11

1.3.2 Checking of Consultant Prepared Bridge Plans 1-12

1.3.3 Schedule for Processing Construction Lettings 1-16

1.3.4 Bridge Project Tracking System 1-17

1.3.5 Approval Process for Standards 1-21

2 GENERAL DESIGN AND LOCATION FEATURES 2-1

2.1 Geometrics 2-1

2.1.1 Bridge Geometrics 2-1

2.1.2 Bridge Deck Requirements 2-2

2.1.3 Bridge Undercrossing Geometrics 2-7

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN ii

2.4 Final Bridge Plans and Special Provisions 2-43

2.4.1 Final Design Instructions 2-44

2.4.1.1 Superstructure 2-45

2.4.1.1.1 Framing Plan 2-45 2.4.1.1.2 Concrete Wearing Course 2-46 2.4.1.1.3 Diaphragms and Cross Frames 2-46 2.4.1.2 Pedestrian Bridges 2-47 2.4.1.3 Temporary Bridges and Widenings 2-49 2.4.1.4 Bridge Approaches 2-50 2.4.1.5 Survey 2-50 2.4.1.6 Utilities 2-50 2.4.1.7 Precedence of Construction Documents 2-52 2.4.1.8 Design Calculation Requirements 2-52 2.4.2 Final Plans 2-52

2.4.2.1 Drafting Standards 2-53 2.4.2.2 Drafting Guidelines 2-53 2.4.2.3 General Plan and Elevation 2-56 2.4.2.4 Bridge Layout and Staking Plan 2-61 2.4.2.5 Standard Abbreviations 2-64 2.4.2.6 Inclusion of Standard Bridge Details in Plan Sets 2-64 2.4.2.7 Use of Bridge Standard Plans 2-64 2.4.2.8 Standard Plan Notes 2-64 2.4.2.9 Quantity Notes and Pay Items 2-65 2.4.3 Revised Sheets 2-66

2.5 Reconstruction Guidelines and Details 2-67

2.5.1 Superstructure 2-67

2.5.1.1 Railings 2-67 2.5.1.2 Wearing Course 2-69 2.5.1.3 Expansion/Fixed Joints 2-69 2.5.2 Substructure 2-81

2.5.2.1 Abutments 2-81 2.5.2.2 Piers 2-81 2.5.3 Pavement 2-81

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN iii

2.6 Construction Requirements 2-87

APPENDIX 2-A: BRIDGE TYPE NUMBERS 2-88

APPENDIX 2-B: SPECIAL PROVISIONS – 2005 SPEC BOOK 2-89

APPENDIX 2-C: STANDARD ABBREVIATIONS 2-92

APPENDIX 2-D: BRIDGE DETAILS PART I (B-DETAILS) 2-95

APPENDIX 2-E: BRIDGE DETAILS PART II (STANDARD FIGURES) 2-97

APPENDIX 2-F: BRIDGE STANDARD PLANS: CULVERTS 2-99

APPENDIX 2-G: MN/DOT STANDARD PLANS: SPECIAL STRUCTURES 2-100

APPENDIX 2-H: STANDARD PLAN NOTES 2-101

APPENDIX 2-I: STANDARD SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES NOTES 2-110

APPENDIX 2-J: BRIDGE PAY ITEMS 2-112

APPENDIX 2-K: CONVERSION FROM INCHES TO DECIMALS OF A FOOT 2-116

3 LOAD AND LOAD FACTORS 3-1

3.1 Load Factors and Combinations 3-1

3.2 Load Modifiers 3-3

3.3 Permanent Loads (Dead and Earth) 3-4

3.4 Live Loads 3-4

3.4.1 HL-93 Live Load, LL 3-5

3.4.2 Multiple Presence Factor, MPF 3-5

3.4.3 Dynamic Load Allowance, IM 3-5

3.4.4 Pedestrian Live Load, PL 3-5

3.4.5 Braking Force, BR 3-5

3.4.6 Centrifugal Force, CE 3-6

3.4.7 Live Load Application to Buried Structures 3-6

3.4.8 Live Load Surcharge, LS 3-6

3.10 Earth Pressure, EV, EH, or ES 3-8

3.11 Temperature, Shrinkage, Creep, Settlement, TU, SH, CR, SE 3-8

OCTOBER 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN iv

4.2.1 Dead Load Distribution 4-2

4.2.2 Live Load Distribution 4-2

4.2.2.1 Steel and Prestressed Concrete Beams 4-3 4.2.2.2 Slab Spans and Timber Decks 4-3 4.2.3 Sidewalk Pedestrian Live Load 4-3

OCTOBER 2004 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN v

5.2.1 Minimum Clear Cover and Clear Spacing 5-5

5.2.2 Reinforcing Bar Lists 5-7

5.2.3 General Reinforcement Practices 5-14

5.2.4 Reinforcement Bar Couplers 5-14

5.5.3 PT Precast or Cast-In-Place Box Girders 5-36

5.6 Concrete Finishes and Coatings 5-36

5.7 Design Examples 5-37

5.7.1 Three-Span Haunched Reinforced Concrete Slab 5-39

OCTOBER 2004 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN vi

5.7.2 Prestressed I-Beam Design Example 5-71

5.7.3 Three-Span Haunched Post-Tensioned Concrete Slab

Design Example 5-101

6 STEEL STRUCTURES 6-1

6.1 Materials 6-1

6.2 General Dimensions And Details 6-3

6.3 General Design Philosophy 6-7

6.7 Box Or Tub Girders 6-15

6.8 Bolted Connections And Splices 6-15

6.9 Two-Span Plate Girder Design Example 6-16

JUNE 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN vii

8.3 Timber Pile Caps 8-6

8.5.1 Longitudinally Laminated Timber Deck Design Example 8-8

8.5.2 Design Example: Timber Pile Cap 8-26

9 DECKS AND DECK SYSTEMS 9-1

9.1 General 9-1

9.1.1 Deck Drainage 9-2

9.2 Concrete Deck on Beams 9-2

9.2.1 Deck Design and Detailing 9-4

9.3 Reinforced Concrete Deck Design Example 9-17

10.5 Pile Bent Piers and Integral Abutments 10-15

10.6 Evaluation of Existing Pile Foundations when Exposed by Scour 10-16

10.7 Structure Excavation and Backfill 10-17

JUNE 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN viii

Appendix 10-A: Sample Bridge Construction Unit Recommendations 10-19

11 ABUTMENTS, PIERS, AND WALLS 11-1

11.1 Abutments 11-1

11.1.1 Integral or Contraction Abutments 11-3

11.1.2 Parapet Abutments 11-6

11.1.2.1 Low Abutments 11-9 11.1.2.2 High Abutments 11-9 11.1.3 Wingwalls 11-12

11.3.1 Cantilever Retaining Walls 11-25

11.3.2 Counterfort Retaining Walls 11-25

11.3.3 Anchored Walls 11-26

11.3.4 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls 11-26

11.3.5 Prefabricated Modular Walls 11-28

11.3.6 Timber Noise Walls on Retaining Walls 11-28

11.3.7 Cantilevered Sheet Pile Walls 11-28

11.3.8 Design Charts of Cantilevered Sheet Pile Soil Retention

Walls for Temporary Applications 11-29 11.4 Design Examples 11-39

11.4.1 High Parapet Abutment Design Example 11-39

11.4.2 Retaining Wall Design Example 11-71

11.4.3 Three-Column Pier Design Example 11-93

AUGUST 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN ix

12.4 Arch Or 3-Sided Structure Design Data 12-6

12.5 Design Criteria for Long-Span Corrugated Steel Structures 12-14

12.6 10' x 10' Precast Concrete Box Culvert Design Example 12-18

13.3.1 Type F Barrier Design Example 13-17

13.3.2 Adhesive Anchor Design Example 13-31

14 JOINTS AND BEARINGS 14-1

14.1 Bridge Movements and Fixity 14-1

14.2 Expansion Joints 14-1

14.2.1 Thermal Movements 14-2

14.2.2 Strip Seal Expansion Joints 14-2

14.2.3 Modular Expansion Joints 14-3

14.2.4 Expansion Joint Detailing 14-3

14.3 Bearings 14-4

14.3.1 Loads and Movements 14-5

14.3.2 Bearing Details 14-5

OCTOBER 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN x

14.3.3 Elastomeric Bearings 14-6

14.3.3.1 Design 14-6

14.3.3.1.1 Size and Stability 14-7 14.3.3.2 Fixed Bearings 14-7 14.3.3.3 Expansion Bearings 14-8

14.3.3.3.1 Minimum Compressive Load 14-8 14.3.4 Pot Bearings 14-9

14.3.5 Other Types of Bearings 14-10

14.4 Curved Plate Design 14-10

14.5 Bearing Plate Design 14-11

14.6 Sole Plate Design (Steel Beams) 14-12

14.7 Tables 14-12

14.8 Design Examples 14-20

14.8.1 Fixed Elastomeric Bearing Design Example 14-21

14.8.2 Expansion Elastomeric Bearing Design Example 14-29

#2005-01 LRFD and Bridge Load Rating Issues (dated February 14, 2005)

#2005-02 Discontinue Use of Cast Bearing Option (dated November 9, 2005)

#2005-03 New MN45 and MN54 PCB (dated November 10, 2005)

#2006-01 New MN63 PCB (dated May 31, 2006)

#2007-01 Bridge Office Substructure Protection Policy (dated July 23, 2007)

#2007-02 Adhesive Anchors Under Sustained Tensile Loads (dated Oct 3, 2007)

#2007-03 Prestressed Beam Camber and Deflection (dated Oct 3, 2007)

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-1

This section contains general information about the manual along with a general description of the Bridge Office and its procedures

This manual contains Mn/DOT Bridge Office policies and procedures for the design, evaluation, and rehabilitation of bridges Except where noted, the design provisions herein employ the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) methodology set forth by AASHTO

Mn/DOT utilizes a decimal numbering system to classify documents The

“5” before the hyphen represents a publication related to engineering this

is a test functions The “300” series of documents is assigned to the Bridge Office; the “90” series indicates that this is a “Manual” The last digit “2” specifies that the subject matter of the document is “Design”

The original bridge design manual, numbered 5-392, provided guidance for the design of highway structures in Minnesota in accordance with allowable stress design methods Subsequently, it has received periodic updates as design methods have changed This version of the Bridge Design Manual contains significant changes It presents Mn/DOT’s design practices in conformance with a new design methodology, Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD), and also contains fifteen comprehensive design examples

Use of this manual does not relieve the design engineer of responsibility for the design of a bridge or structural component Although Bridge Office policy is presented here for numerous situations, content of the manual is not intended to be exhaustive Therefore, use of this manual must be tempered with sound engineering judgement

After the introductory material provided in this section, the manual contains material arranged around the following section headings To simplify locating material, section numbers correspond to those used in the LRFD specifications:

1) Introduction 2) General Design and Location Features 3) Loads and Load Factors

4) Structural Analysis and Evaluation 5) Concrete Structures

6) Steel Structures 7) Reserved

8) Wood Structures 9) Decks and Deck Systems 10) Foundations

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-2

11) Abutments, Piers, and Walls 12) Buried Structures

13) Railings 14) Joints and Bearings Memos

This manual will be updated multiple times each year as procedures are updated and new information becomes available Current files for each section of the manual are available on the Bridge Office Web site at:

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/

Each section of the manual contains general information at the start of the section Design examples (if appropriate) are located at the end of each section The general content is divided into subsections that are identified with numerical section labels in the left margin Labels for design example subsections are identified with alphanumeric labels in the left hand margin The left hand margin also contains references to LRFD Design Specification Articles, Equations, and Tables These references are enclosed in square brackets

Within the body of the text, references to other sections of this manual are directly cited (e.g Section 10.1) References to the LRFD Specifications within the main body of the text contain a prefix of: LRFD

A bridge is defined under Minnesota Rule 8810.8000 as “a structure having an opening measured horizontally along the center of the roadway

of ten feet or more between undercopings of abutments, between spring line of arches, or between extreme ends of openings for multiple boxes

Bridge also includes multiple pipes where the clear distance between openings is less than half of the smaller contiguous opening.”

In accordance with Minnesota Statute 15.06 Subd 6, the Commissioner

of Transportation has delegated approval authority for State Preliminary Bridge Plans, and State, County and City Final Bridge Plans to the State Bridge Engineer Plans for all bridge construction or reconstruction projects located on the Trunk Highway System, and plans on County or City highways funded fully or in part by state funds shall be approved by the State Bridge Engineer

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-3

The Bridge Office is responsible for conducting all bridge and structural design activities and for providing direction, advice, and services for all bridge construction and maintenance activities The responsibilities include:

• Providing overall administrative and technical direction for the office

• Reviewing and approving all preliminary and final bridge plans prepared by the office and consultants

• Representing the Department in bridge design, construction and maintenance matters with other agencies

The Office is under the direction of the State Bridge Engineer It is composed of sections and units as shown on the organizational chart (Figure 1.2.1.1) Each of these subdivisions with their principal functions

is listed as follows:

1) Bridge Design Section Responsible for the design, plans, and special provisions activities for bridges, and miscellaneous transportation structures

a) Design Unit i) Designs and drafts bridge plans

ii) Reviews bridge plans prepared by consulting engineers

iii) Prepares special provisions for bridge plans

iv) Designs and drafts plans for miscellaneous highway structures

v) Provides technical assistance, designs, and plans for special bridge and structural problems

b) Bridge Standards and Research Unit i) Provides design aids and standards for the office and for consultants, counties, and cities

ii) Coordinates the development and users of computer programs with data processing systems

iii) Supports computer users throughout the office and manages the local area network

iv) Provides oversight for research projects, which involve the Bridge Office

c) Design/Build Unit i) Provides oversight of design/build projects

d) LRFD Implementation i) Maintains LRFD Bridge Design Manual

ii) Provides support to office and consulting engineers concerning LRFD issues

2) Bridge Planning Section Responsible for program, cost estimates, preliminary bridge plan activities for Trunk Highways and review of state aid bridges

a) Bridge Agreements and Estimates Unit

1.2.1 Bridge Office

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-4

i) Selects and negotiates with consulting engineers and administers engineering agreements for the preparation of bridge plans

ii) Provides liaison between the office and the consulting engineer retained to prepare bridge plans

iii) Coordinates public and private utility requirements for bridges.

iv) Prepares preliminary, comparative and final cost estimates

v) Maintains and provides current program and plan status records

b) Preliminary Plans i) Conducts preliminary studies from layouts and develops preliminary bridge plans

ii) Provides liaison with district and central office road design through the design stage

iii) Obtains required permits from other agencies for bridges

c) State Aid Bridge Unit i) Reviews bridge plans and special provisions for county, township, and municipal state aid projects

ii) Provides technical assistance to counties and municipalities, when requested, for nonparticipating projects

3) Bridge Construction and Maintenance Section Responsible for bridge construction and maintenance specifications, and bridge construction and maintenance advisory service activities to the office and to the job site

a) Construction and Maintenance Unit; North, Metro and South Regions

i) Provides construction and maintenance advisory service to bridge construction and maintenance engineers in the field

ii) Writes bridge construction and maintenance specifications, manuals and bulletins

iii) Writes and maintains the file of current special provisions for bridge construction and maintenance

iv) Performs preliminary, periodic and final review of bridge construction and maintenance projects and makes recommendations

v) Reviews bridge plans and special provisions prior to lettings and makes recommendations

vi) Aids municipal and county engineers with bridge construction and maintenance problems, upon request

vii) Provides foundation design including selection of pile type, length, design load, and foundation preparation

viii) Reviews bridge improvement projects and prepares recommendations for scope of work

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-5

b) Bridge Ratings Unit i) Makes bridge ratings and load postings analysis for existing bridges and maintains the records

ii) Reviews and approves special load permit requests

c) Structural Metals Inspection Unit i) Provides inspection services for structural metals, fabrication and assembly to ensure conformity with plans and specifications

d) Fabrication Methods Unit i) Reviews and approves structural metals shop drawings submitted by fabricators

ii) Provides fabrication advisory service to designers, fabricators and field construction and maintenance personnel

iii) Provides overhead sign design services to the Office of Traffic Engineering, including the design of bridge-mounted sign trusses

e) Bridge Management Unit i) Maintains inventory and inspection data for the 19,600 bridges in Minnesota Works with all agencies to make certain appropriate data is collected

ii) Responsible for implementing bridge management systems to provide information on bridges for maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement

f) Bridge Inspection Unit i) Provides expert assistance to the Districts in organizing and conducting inspections of complex bridges, special features, and fracture critical bridges

ii) Conducts quality assurance inspections of all agencies responsible for bridge inspections in Minnesota

iii) Reviews, recommends and provides bridge inspection training for District, county, and municipal bridge inspectors

4) Hydraulic Engineering Section Responsible for providing statewide hydraulic engineering services that include design, construction and maintenance activities In addition, the section provides leadership in the development and implementation of hydraulic automation technology, establishes policy pertaining to hydrology and hydraulics, prepares design aids, provides client training, participates in research projects, and represents the department on state and national committees

a) Bridge Design Hydraulics Unit i) Provides bridge and culvert waterway designs for trunk highway, county, city and township projects

ii) Analyzes and evaluates inplace bridges for scour

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-6

iii) Provides technical assistance to counties and municipalities upon request

iv) Provides training in hydrology and hydraulics

b) Road Design Hydraulics Unit i) Evaluates and codes all bridges over water for scour

ii) Provides technical assistance to Districts on all aspects of drainage design

iii) Reviews and cost prorates storm drains on the municipal and county state aid system

iv) Coordinates the review of new products and development of specifications and policies pertaining to their use

c) Hydraulics Automation Unit i) Provides leadership and technical direction for managing the statewide hydraulic automation effort

ii) Develops and implements the means to integrate the hydraulic design process with the road design process

iii) Develops, implements, and supports a hydraulic information system to facilitate the sharing of hydraulic data among all users and stakeholders

iv) Provides statewide training and support in the implementation and use of hydraulic automation techniques

For more information, visit the Bridge Office Web site at:

http://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-7

Figure 1.2.1.1 Mn/DOT Bridge Office Organization Chart

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-8

Highways throughout the nation are divided into systems These system designations are important to know because design standards can vary between the systems The various highway systems are classified according to the Agency that has responsibility for their improvement, maintenance and traffic regulation enforcement Listed below are the jurisdictional divisions in Minnesota:

1) Trunk Highway System The Trunk Highway System consists of all highways, including the Interstate routes, under the jurisdiction of the State of Minnesota

These routes generally are the most important in the state, carry the greatest traffic volumes, and operate at the highest speeds

2) County Highway System The County Highway System is made up of those roads established and designated under the authority of the county board They generally are the more important routes within a county that are not

on the Trunk Highway System

3) Township Road System The Township Road System is made up of the roads established under the authority of the town board They generally are of local importance

4) Municipal Street System The Municipal Street System is all roads within a municipality not designated as a trunk highway or county road They are generally

of local importance

All publicly owned bridges either on or over a trunk highway and over

10 feet in length measured along the centerline of the highway are assigned a number for identification and cost accounting purposes

The numbering scheme followed in assigning bridge numbers depends on the time of construction With few exceptions, the numbering procedure

is as follows:

1) Prior to about 1950, all bridges were numbered consecutively from 1

to 9999 as they were constructed The 8000 series was used for culverts over 10 feet in length (measured along the centerline of the highway) The 7000 series was reserved for county bridges at trunk highway intersections Five-digit bridge numbers beginning with L or

R designate bridges in local bridge systems

2) Since about 1950, a five-digit number has been assigned to each bridge as it was constructed The first two digits coincide with the county number (01-87) in which the bridge is located (99 refers to temporary bridges) The last three digits are assigned consecutively using the following guidelines:

1.2.2 Highway

Systems

1.2.3 Bridge

Numbers

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-9

a 001-499 are used for regular trunk highway bridges

b 500-699 are used for county bridges

c 700-999 are used for interstate bridges (any bridge on or over the interstate system)

3) In 1991, additional numbers were required for bridges on the state aid system in Hennepin County and for interstate bridges in Hennepin County To allocate more numbers for bridges on the local system an alpha character is used as the third character of the bridge number

For example, the next bridge number after Bridge No 27699 will be Bridge No 27A00 Note that this happens only after 500 and 600 series have been exhausted

To allocate more numbers on the Interstate road system, the 400 series of numbers will be used along with the 700, 800, 900's presently used For a bridge number XXYZZ, the following now applies:

XX = County identification number (99 = Temporary Bridge)

Y = 0, 1, 2, 3, or R, T, U (for Trunk Highway Bridges)

Y = 4, 7, 8, 9, or V, or W (for Interstate Bridges)

Y = X and Y (Trunk Highway or Interstate Culverts)

Y = 5 or 6 or A through H (for non-trunk highway Bridges)

Y = J through N, and P, Q (for non-trunk highway Culverts)

ZZ = Sequence number (00 through 99)

4) In cases of twin bridges, a westbound or southbound lane bridge is generally assigned a lower number than an eastbound or northbound lane bridge

All bridge numbers are assigned by the Bridge Office A complete listing

of all numbered bridges is available in computer printout form entitled

Table 1.2.3.1 for a listing of the county identification numbers

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-10

Table 1.2.3.1 Minnesota County Identification Numbers

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-11

Bridge designs shall typically consider Strength, Service, Extreme Event, and Fatigue limit states The limit state checks will vary with the component under consideration Not all elements will require consideration of all limit states For example, the fatigue limit state need not be considered for fully prestressed pretensioned elements

This section covers the Bridge Office procedures for checking of bridge plans, scheduling of projects, and revising or creating standards

The general practice of most engineering offices is to require that designs they produce be checked before they are reviewed and certified by the

“Engineer in Responsible Charge” Although this practice has always been required for structures designed for Mn/DOT, it is recognized that the quality of the checking process often varies according to time restraints, confidence in the designer, and the instructions given to the checker Therefore, in order to maintain a consistent design checking process the following guidance is given for routine bridge designs

For more complex or unusual designs, the checker is advised to discuss additional requirements with the design unit leader Also, the checking process described is not meant to apply to the check or review functions required for Mn/DOT review of consultant plans (see Section 1.3.2.) or for construction false work reviews (See the Bridge Construction Manual.)

Three types of design checking will apply:

1) An independent analysis of the completed design

2) A check of original design computations for mathematical accuracy, application of code, and accepted engineering practice

3) A review of drafted details for constructibility and accepted engineering practice

Generally, an independent analysis to confirm the adequacy of the complete design is preferred Significant differences should be discussed and resolved before the plan is certified The separate set of calculations should be included with the design file as a record of the completed design check

When circumstances prevent a complete independent analysis, as a minimum, an independent analysis shall be completed for the following:

1) Live and dead loads 2) Critical beam lines 3) A pier cap

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-12

4) A pier footing 5) Main reinforcement for high abutments 6) An abutment footing

However, for the elements not independently analyzed, the original computations should be checked for mathematical accuracy of original design computations, applications of code, and accepted engineering practice Checked computations should be initialed by the checker, and the independent analysis should be included in the design file

When doing a separate analysis, the checker may make simplifying assumptions to streamline the checking process However, when major differences are found, results must be discussed and resolved with the designer For instance, for normal piers, piling might be analyzed for dead and live loads only if lateral loads appear to have been reasonably applied in the original computations or the “AISC Beam Diagram and Formula Tables” may be used to approximate pier cap moment and shear

Whether the check is a completely independent analysis or a minimal analysis combined with a computations check, some details, such as the reinforcing details in a wall corner, also require review by the checker

Often referencing old bridge plans with similar details allows the checker

to compare the current design to details that have performed well in the past

Consultant prepared bridge plans are created by private engineering firms through contracts with the Department The finished plans are complete to the extent that they can be used for construction

Since these plans receive final approval of the State Bridge Engineer, there must be assurance that the plans are geometrically accurate and buildable; structural design is adequate and design codes have been correctly applied; proper direction is given to the construction contractor;

and all construction costs are accounted for Plan errors may cause costly construction delays or safety may be compromised by an inadequate design

To keep consultant plan reviews consistent and timely, a procedure was developed as a guide that assigns priority to specific items in the plans

The overall review includes “a Thorough Check” and “Cursory Review” of various items The distinction between “Thorough Check” and “Cursory Review” is as follows:

1.3.2 Checking of

Consultant

Prepared Bridge

Plans

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-13

Thorough Check refers to performing complete mathematical computations in order to identify discrepancies in the plans, or conducting careful comparisons of known data and standards of the Project with values given in the plan

Cursory Review refers to a comparative analysis for agreement with standard practice and consistency with similar structures, all with application of engineering judgment Mathematical analysis is not required, but may be deemed necessary to identify the extent of a discrepancy

The review procedure is listed on the CONSULTANT BRIDGE PLAN REVIEW form following this section Headings on this list are defined as follows:

PARTIAL PLAN: In order to assure that the consultant is proceeding in the right direction, an early submittal of the plan is required This submittal usually consists of the General Plan and Elevation sheet showing the overall geometry of the structure and the proposed beam type and spacing; the Bridge Layout Sheet; the Framing Plan sheet; and the Bridge Survey sheets Errors and inconsistencies found in this phase can be corrected before the entire plan is completed For example, a framing plan, including the proposed beams, must be assured as workable on the partial plan before the consultant gets deep into the design of the remainder of the bridge

FINAL PLAN: A final plan should be complete in all areas to the extent that it can be certified by the designer, although a certification signature

is not required for this phase

THOROUGH CHECK: Items indicated for checking on the consultant’s partial plan must be correct Given geometry must fit the roadway layout Most of this information can be checked using data from the approved preliminary plan Approval of the partial plan will indicate that Mn/DOT is satisfied with the geometry and proposed structure, and the consultant may proceed with further development of the plan For the final plan, obvious drafting and numerical errors should be marked to point out the errors to the consultant, however, the reviewer should not provide corrections to errors in the consultant’s numerical computations

Checking on the final plan should be thorough to eliminate possible errors that may occur, such as the pay items in the Schedule of Quantities

Plan notes and pay items can be difficult for a consultant to anticipate because of frequent changes by Mn/DOT Pay items must be correct

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-14

because these are carried throughout the entire accounting system for the Project Plan (P) quantities must also be correctly indicated

CURSORY REVIEW: Normally, a cursory review would not require numerical calculations This type of review can be conducted by reading and observing the contents of the plan in order to assure the completeness of the work The reviewer should be observant to recognize what looks right and what doesn’t look right Obvious errors or inconsistencies on any parts of the plan should be marked for correction

Although structural design is usually the major focus of any plan, most consultants are well versed in design procedures and should need only minimal assistance from our office A comparison of the consultant’s calculations with the plan details should be performed to assure that the plans reflect their design and that the applicable codes are followed An independent design by our office is time consuming and is not recommended unless there is a reasonable doubt as to the adequacy of the consultant’s design

NO REVIEW: A thorough review of these items would be time-consuming and may not produce corrections that are vital to construction; therefore,

it is recommended that little or no time be spent on the listed items

Numerous errors can occur in the Bills of Reinforcement and quantity values However, checking this information is also time-consuming, hence the burden of providing correct data should be placed on the consultant

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-15

CONSULTANT BRIDGE PLAN REVIEW

Br No RTE DATE: PARTIAL PLAN REC'D _ DATE FINAL PLAN REC'D

DESIGN GROUP _ CONSULTANT

No OF SHEETS IN PLAN DESCRIBE COMPLEXITY _

EST REVIEW TIME BY DESIGN GROUP (hrs.) ACTUAL REVIEW TIME (hrs)

Horizontal and vertical clearances Pay items and plan quantities

Stations and elevations on survey line Project numbers

Deck and seat elevations at working points Design data block & Rating on GP&E sheet

Working line location and data Certification block

Coordinates at working points and key stations Standard plan notes

Substructure locations by station Concrete mix numbers

Conformance to preliminary plan Prestressed beam design if inadequate design is suspected

Utilities on bridge Existing major utilities near bridge

CURSORY REVIEW

Steel beam splice locations and diaphragm spacing; flange plate thickness increments (enough to save 800+ # of steel)

Abutment and Pier design to be checked against consultant’s calculations

Conformance to foundation recommendations

Pile loads and earth pressures Check against consultant’s calculations

Proposed precast beams [per 5-393.509(2)] Interior beam seat elevations

Precast conformance to industry standards Bottom-of-footing elevations (for adequate cover)

Proposed steel beam sections Railing lengths and metal post spacing (check for fit)

Use of B-details and standard plan sheets Conformance to aesthetic requirements Notes – General, construction, reference, etc

Quantity items on tabulations Precast beam design (Check against consultant’s calculations)

NO CHECK OR REVIEW REQUIRED

Diagonals on Layout sheet Figures in Bills of Reinforcement Bar shapes and dimensions Rebar placement dimensions Bar marks on details against listed bars Quantity values (including total of tabulations)

JULY 2003 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-16

To meet the Department’s schedule requirements for construction lettings, the following schedule for processing bridge plans, special provisions and estimates must be followed This schedule applies to all projects: Federal Aid, State Funds and Maintenance In general, processing of bridge plans, special provisions and estimates for lettings shall be given priority over all other work, and every effort must be made

to complete the processing in advance of the times shown, which are deadlines

Deadline Time Before Letting Date Schedule and Remarks

Bridge plans complete to the extent that processing can be completed on schedule

14 Weeks (Friday)

12 Weeks (Friday) Preliminary bridge pay items and quantities

for estimate (to Estimating Unit – Design Services)

13 Weeks (Friday)

11 Weeks (Friday)

Bridge plan and special provisions review complete (by Bridge Construction Unit)

13 Weeks (Friday)

11 Weeks (Friday) Bridge special provisions complete, other

information or material for inclusion in Roadway Special Provisions complete (to Special Provisions & Final Processing Unit – Design Services)

12 Weeks (Friday)

10 Weeks (Friday)

Bridge plans complete, approved and dated (to Office Management Unit)

12 Weeks (Friday)

10 Weeks (Friday) Final bridge pay items and quantities for

estimate (to estimating Unit – Design Services)

12 Weeks (Friday)

10 Weeks (Friday)

Final computer runs for bridge estimate during 9th week during 8th week Office copy and final bridge plans (Bridge

plans to Special & Final Processing Unit – Design Services for submittal to FHWA)

8 1 / 2 weeks (Tuesday)

7 weeks (Friday)

Federal Project to FHWA 7 1 / 2 weeks (Tuesday) 7 weeks

(Friday)

Preliminary advertisement 6 1 / 2 weeks (Tuesday) 6 weeks

(Friday) Final advertisement 5 1 / 2 weeks (Tuesday) 5 weeks (Friday) Sale of plans and proposals 5 weeks (Friday) 5 weeks (Friday) Last date for mailing letter addendums by

Special Provisions & Final Processing Unit – Design Services

10 days (Wednesday)

10 days (Wednesday)

1.3.3 Schedule for

Processing

Construction

Lettings

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-17

Completing a bridge design project for contract letting is a multiple step process that involves input from a variety of work units and personnel

Projects are tracked by Mn/DOT using the Program and Project Management System (PPMS) Within PPMS, projects are divided into activities and the activities are further divided into work tasks For example, Activity 1260 is “Preliminary Structure Plans” and Work Task 2

of Activity 1260 is “Draft Preliminary Bridge Plan” Progress of the work tasks on active bridge projects is updated monthly

Following are tables that list work tasks for the major bridge activities within PPMS Table 1.3.4.1 contains a listing of the PPMS work tasks for Activity 1260, “Preliminary Structure Plans” Tables 1.3.4.2 and 1.3.4.3 contain listings of the PPMS work tasks for Activity 1270, “Final Structure Plans”

For more information on activities and work tasks within PPMS, refer to the PPMS Activity Manual located on the Mn/DOT internal web site at

http://ihub.ots/projdev/pmu/ppms/

Table 1.3.4.1 PPMS Work Tasks for Mn/DOT or Consultant Prepared Preliminary Bridge Plans (Activity 1260)

Percent of Activity Completed

1

Receive and review information (grades, alignment, surveys, layout, Hydraulics report, Project Design Memo., Environmental report)

15%

6 Receive Foundation Recommendations from

Regional Bridge Construction Engineer 88%

7 Obtain State Bridge Engineer’s Signature 90%

8 Distribute Signed Plans & Distribute responses on

9 Preliminary Estimate and District Letter 95%

1.3.4 Bridge

Project Tracking

System

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-18

Table 1.3.4.2 PPMS Work Tasks for Mn/DOT Prepared Final Bridge Plans (Activity 1270)

Percent of Activity Completed *

1 Receive Preliminary Bridge Plan, Final Repair

Recommendation, or Special Structure Request 5%

Receive District Design Information (Signal, Lighting, Signing, TMS, etc.)

Receive Utility Information

2

Receive Stage Construction Sheets

10%

4 Conduct Analysis and Design, Including Check 45%

Draft and Check Plan Sheets

5

8 Send Informational Copies to FHWA and District 88%

12 Obtain State Bridge Engineer’s Signature 100%

* May vary by job complexity.

Table 1.3.4.3 PPMS Work Tasks for Consultant Prepared Final Bridge Plans (Activity 1270)

Percent of Activity Completed

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-19

A listing of the work type codes used in PPMS is given in Table 1.3.4.4

Table 1.3.4.4 PPMS Bridge Work Type Codes

17 Replace Superstructure - No Preliminary Plan Req'd

18 Repair Railing or Median Barrier

23 Widen without Substructure Work & Replace Deck

24 Widen without Substructure Work & Deck Overlay

25 Widen without Substructure Work, Deck Overlay & Paint

26 Widen without Substructure Work & Other Minor Work

27 Widen without Substructure Work & Paint

28 Replace Deck & Paint

29 Replace Deck & Other Minor Work

31 Deck Overlay & Replace Railing or Median Barrier

32 Deck Overlay, Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Paint

33 Deck Overlay & Other Minor Work

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-20

Table 1.3.4.4 PPMS Bridge Work Type Codes (Continued)

35 Deck Overlay & Paint

37 Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Paint

38 Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Other Minor Work

39 Paint & Other Minor Work

40 Repair Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints

41 Widen without Substructure Work, Replace Deck & Paint

42 Replace Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints

44 Deck Repair & Replace Joints

45 Deck Overlay & Repair Railing or Median Barrier

46 Deck Overlay, Repair Railing or Median Barrier & Replace Joints

47 Deck Repair - Rail Rehab

48 Minor Work (Deck Repair, Paint, & Repair Railing or Median Barrier)

49 Deck Overlay, Paint & Repair Railing or Median Barrier

52 Repair Concrete Arch

54 Riprap

58 Paint & Replace Joints

60 Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Deck

61 Widen with Substructure Work & Deck Overlay

62 Widen with Substructure Work, Deck Overlay & Paint

63 Widen with Substructure Work & Paint

64 Widen with Substructure Work, Replace Deck & Paint

66 Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Superstructure

68 Widen with Substructure Work & Replace Railing or Median Barrier

MARCH 2006 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 1-21

1.3.5 Approval

Process for

Standards

FLOW CHART FOR REVISING BRIDGE STANDARDS (Includes B-Details and Standards)

Request For New Standards

Or Revising Existing Standards

Bridge Standards Unit

Review By SSRC

Review By R & D

Minor Modific ation

To Existing Standards

Modific ations Needed?

Does Revision Affec t Others Outside Of Bridge Offic e?

Show New Revision Date

Yellow Routing Proc ess

New Standard Created, Existing Standards Revised

Standard Signed By State Bridge Engineer

Transmittal Mem o

To Manual Users

Publish On Web Site

Solic it/Rec eive Com ments Input from:

R & D Com m.

SSRC Com m Other Bridge Offic e Engr./Staff Other Mn/DOT Personnel

Consultants Industry Cities/Counties FHWA

BR3810.CDR

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-1

The design of a bridge typically takes place in two major phases of work:

preliminary design and final design During preliminary design, the structure type, the foundation type, the aesthetics, and the primary geometry for the bridge are determined During final design, specific details for all of the elements of the bridge are developed and presented

in the plan set These details include material descriptions, quantities, and geometric information Final plan sets are typically assembled in an order that roughly follows the order of construction: from the ground up

This section of the manual contains a large amount of information useful for the preparation and assembly of plans for a project To facilitate the production of plans and standardize the content of bridge plan sets, special provisions, B-Details, standard plans, standard plan notes, and standard pay items have been prepared by the Bridge Office Appendices

to Section 2 identify the material available

As the name of the section implies, content for this section is general in nature Guidance for the design of specific structural elements (e.g

decks, retaining walls, etc.) is provided elsewhere in the manual

The following definitions apply:

• Mainline Highways – Roadways that carry through traffic lanes for freeways, expressways, and primary and secondary highways

• Local Roads – Rural roads off the trunk highway system

• Local Streets – Urban roads off the state trunk highway system

• Ramps – Segments of roadway connecting two or more legs at an interchange

• Urban Design – Roadways with curbs on the right and/or left sides

• Rural Design – Roadways without curbs

• Median Width – The distance between the edges of opposing through traffic lanes

• Auxiliary Lane – A lane adjoining a through traffic lane for a purpose supplementary to through traffic movement such as truck climbing, weaving, speed change or turning

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-2

be carried over and under the bridge to the maximum extent practicable

Rural design is considered the desirable design and will be used in all rural areas and in urban areas where sufficient right of way is available or can be obtained Urban design geometrics (curbed roadways) are slightly more restrictive and are therefore used at locations where extensive right-of-way cost or other unusual conditions are controlling factors

The discussion of geometric details included in this section describes bridge deck geometrics separately from bridge undercrossing geometrics

For side clearances at certain undercrossing situations, both a “desirable”

and a minimum section are shown Incorporation of the “desirable”

section at undercrossings is mandatory unless approved by the Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer

Application of Standards

The geometrics shown apply specifically to new work However, use of these geometrics is also highly desirable when upgrading or widening existing facilities and should be incorporated in these situations Bridge deck geometrics on the local road system must also comply with

State-Aid for Local Transportation Operations Rules, Chapter 8820

Responsibility

The Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer will be responsible for assuring that the geometric standards in this section are followed Where a deviation from the standard is necessary, a written description of the deviation shall be prepared by the Preliminary Bridge Plans Engineer and submitted to the State Bridge Engineer when submitting the Preliminary Bridge Plan for acceptance

Bridge Width Criteria

Roadway cross sections that approach bridges will normally provide a clear zone recovery area beside the travel lane for the benefit of out-of-control vehicles It is not economical or practical to carry these full clear zone widths across bridges Standard widths for bridge shoulders have been set to balance costs and safety Since the railing is located within the clear zone it is considered a hazard and guardrail protection is required in the approach area

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-3

Functions of the shoulder include:

• Recovery area to regain control of a vehicle

• Emergency parking area for stalled vehicles and escape route for stranded motorists

• Passageway for bicycles and occasional pedestrians

• Passageway for emergency vehicles

• Parking area for bridge maintenance and inspection vehicle (snooper)

• Temporary traffic lane during deck repairs or overlay construction

• Area for deck drainage and snow storage

• Accommodates passing of wide oversize loads, especially farm machinery

• On two-lane highways, the shoulders provide an escape area to avoid

a head-on collision with an oncoming passing vehicle

The following shoulder widths for both rural and urban design apply to trunk highway bridges In addition, these standards apply to bridges on local roads at a trunk highway freeway interchange For local roads and

streets, the bridge roadway widths are given in the State Aid Manual, Section 5-892.210 and the State Aid Operations Rules, Chapter 8820

Exceptionally long bridges or bridges with a high cost per square foot should be evaluated on an individual basis and modifications to these standards are allowed based on judgment In addition to these values, the bridge roadway width shall meet the additional requirements for sight distance and sharp curvature as specified in Part 4 below

1) Rural Design a) Two-Lane Rural Design Shoulder widths are given in the table on Figure 2.1.4.1 and are dependent on the functional classification of the roadway and traffic volumes

b) Four-Lane Rural Design i) Right Shoulder 12'-0"

ii) Left Shoulder 6'-0"

c) Six- or Eight-Lane Rural Divided Highway i) Right Shoulder 12'-0"

ii) Left Shoulder 12'-0"

The full inside shoulder allows disabled vehicles in the left lane

to stop on the inside shoulder rather than try to cross two or three lanes of traffic to get to the outside shoulder

d) Mainline Rural Bridge with Auxiliary Lane i) Right Shoulder 8'-0"

e) Mainline Rural Bridge with Entrance or Exit Ramps i) Right Shoulder 8'-0"

f) Rural Bridges with Turn Lanes

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-4

i) Right Turn Lane (1) Right shoulder 6'-0"

ii) Left Turn Lanes (1) Adjacent to a barrier railing: 4'-0" minimum shoulder, 6'-0"

desirable

g) Rural Ramp Bridges (one 16'-0" lane, one-way) i) Right Shoulder 6'-0"

ii) Left Shoulder 4'-0"

On ramp bridges the dimension from edge of lane to gutter is reduced to prevent the appearance of a two-lane bridge on a one-lane ramp The roadway width is 26'-0", which allows traffic to pass a stalled vehicle With a 16'-0" lane the outside 2'-0" could, in effect, be considered as part of the shoulder for

a 12'-0" lane

2) Urban Design (Approach Curbs) For urban designs the bridge gutter lines shall be aligned with the curb line on the approaching roadway with the following exceptions:

a) On four-lane divided highways where there are no median curbs, the left shoulder shall be 6'-0"

b) On six- and eight-lane divided highways where there are no median curbs, the left shoulder shall be 10'-0" minimum

c) On one-lane urban ramps (16'-0" approach roadway), both right and left shoulders shall be 4'-0" (provides a 24'-0" roadway)

d) Where an auxiliary lane, ramp, or taper extends onto a mainline bridge, the right shoulder shall be 6'-0"

e) The minimum distance to a barrier railing is 6'-0" desired, 4'-0"

minimum

Urban shoulder widths will vary according to functional class, traffic volumes, scope of work, and quality of pavement surface Typical

values are shown in the Road Design Manual, Tables 4-4.01A,

4-4.01B, and 4-4.01C Provide a 2'-0" reaction distance to a raised island type median or sidewalk curb where vehicle speeds are 40 mph and under For design speeds 45 mph and higher, provide a 4'-0"

reaction distance

3) Bus Shoulders Where the right shoulder has been designated as a bus shoulder a 12'-0" width shall be provided across bridges See Road Design Manual 4-4.03 and Table 4-4.03A

4) Additional Width Criteria a) Where a ramp (loop) bridge is on a radius of 190'-0" or less, or when the volume of trucks is 10% or greater, the effective traffic

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-5

lane is increased from 16'-0" to 18'-0" in width to accommodate truck turning movements Increase the width of the ramp bridge accordingly

b) For curved bridges longer than 100 feet, check the horizontal stopping sight distance and increase the inside shoulder width up

to a maximum of 10'-0" See Road Design Manual, Chapter 3 for

calculation of this distance The 2001 edition of the AASHTO

book, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,

changed the height of object from 6" (muffler) to 2'-0" (tail light)

Table 2.1.2.1 gives widths required for a continuously curving bridge for various design speeds and curvature, and applies only where the line of sight is blocked by the railing

Table 2.1.2.1 Shoulder Width Requirements for Curved Bridges

SHOULDER WIDTH FOR DEGREE OF

CURVATURE LISTED DESIGN

c) For bridges on tapers, the taper should begin or end at a pier or

an abutment, or continue across the entire length of the bridge

Extra width to eliminate or simplify a taper or curvature is permissible where justified by simplified design and construction

Cross Slopes on Bridges

1) The cross slope on bridge traffic lanes is the same as the approaching roadway lanes, normally 0.02 ft./ft The shoulder cross slope on the bridge may continue at 0.02 ft./ft or, if better drainage is desired, may be 0.005 ft./ft greater than the adjacent lane, with a maximum cross slope of 0.04 ft./ft When the bridge deck is superelevated, the shoulders shall have the same slopes as the adjacent bridge traffic lanes

Keep superelevation transitions off bridges In instances where they are unavoidable, it is preferable for ease of deck pouring to maintain

a straight line across the deck at all locations (allows a straight screed between paving rails placed at both sides of the deck.)

FEBRUARY 2007 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 2-6

2) Ramp cross slopes shall be uniform between the bridge curbs with a slope of 0.02 ft./ft to the right unless superelevated

Bridge Median

On divided highways with a separate bridge for each roadway, the openings between bridges must be a minimum of 8'-0" wide if access for bridge inspection vehicles (snoopers) is required

Longitudinal joints along the median of bridges should be used only for bridge roadways wider than about 100 feet or for other special cases By eliminating this joint on bridges with medians, simpler detailing and simpler construction can be used

Bridge Sidewalks and Bikeways

Bridge sidewalks of 6'-0" minimum widths are to be provided where justified by pedestrian traffic When bicycle traffic is expected, the width should be 8'-0" minimum and 10'-0" desirable Where an off road bikeway is to be carried across a bridge, the full width of the approach bikeway may be continued across the bridge up to a width of 12'-0", which is considered the practical maximum width for a bikeway on a bridge When the shoulders of the bikeway cannot be carried over bridges, provide lead-in guardrail

The curb height for sidewalks adjacent to the roadway is 8" When the design speed on the street is over 40 mph, a concrete barrier is required between the roadway and the sidewalk (or bikeway) In addition, a pedestrian (or bikeway) railing is required on the outside

When a barrier is provided between the traffic lanes and the sidewalk, use the bridge slab for the walkway (i.e., do not require an additional pour for sidewalk) Advise the road plans designer to provide for any necessary sidewalk ramping off the bridge

Sidewalks and bikeways shall have a minimum cross slope of 0.01 ft./ft

Protective Rails at Bridge Approaches

The ends of bridge railings must be protected from being impacted (except on low speed roads such as city streets) For design speeds over

40 mph, a crash tested guardrail transition (normally plate beam guardrail) is required

Refer to State-Aid Operation Rules, Chapter 8820 for guardrail

requirements on local bridges