IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answers: Agree/ Disagree (Phần 4)

Some people think the government should pay for health care and education, but other people claim that it is the individual’s responsibility.. Personally, I think that basic health care

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answers: Agree/ Disagree (Phần 4)

16 Some people think the government should pay for health care and education, but other people claim that it is the individual’s responsibility Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, health care and education have become the focus of the people’s concern It is a highly debated issue as to who should pay for these services There are those who argue that the government should pay for them while others think the costs should be shouldered by individuals Personally, I think that basic health care and primary education should be on the government but advanced health care and higher education should be borne by the individual

It is irrefutable that it is the government’s responsibility to make basic health care and primary education accessible to everyone The reason is that a nation’s prosperity very much depends on the contribution made by its well-educated citizens who are in good health After all we all pay taxes and

so we are entitled to get something back in return Private schools and private hospitals can be available for those who want and can afford it but the free schools and free government hospitals should always be there

On the other hand, individuals should be responsible for their advanced health care Actually, the advanced medical and surgical treatments are very expensive So, instead of depending on government we should take some health insurance or save in any other way with the tomorrow in mind Higher education, too benefits the individual more than the nation So it is quite reasonable to pay for it from one’s pocket

There are, of course, some sections of society who cannot afford their own healthcare The government should have some system of knowing their financial status and provide free healthcare so that nobody dies for want of treatment As far as higher education is concerned, the government can have some system of interest free loans for the needy and meritorious students

To sum up, basic education and primary education should be borne by the government but advanced health care and education should be paid by the individual from his pocket

Model Answer 2:

Nowadays most countries in the world have set up public hospitals and schools for residents’ overall health and improvement Yet the disagreement is never stopped, as the opponents insist that it is not the governments’ responsibility to do so

Public medical care and education is of great importance to individual physical and mental wellbeing,

especially for those from less wealthy background To be precise, not everyone can afford the whole family’s medical consumption and children’s tuition fees But only people with healthy body and healthy mind have the capacity to contribute to the country’s development Obviously, a nation’s prosperity cannot rely on minor rich residents, who can pay for their own health care and education, alone In addition, governments’ tax revenue comes from all social status It indicates that all citizens have equal rights to enjoy operations and schools paid by governments and governments should support them

However, it is not realistic that government is responsible for all spending of residents’ health care and education Decisions regarding the level of government’s investments should involve the concern

of a country’s economic situation In other words, it would be a significant financial burden if such expenses took up too much of government’s budget Accordingly, it is not reasonable to require government to take all responsibilities For example, Chinese government can only support children free primary and middle school education, in regard to the more than 1 billion population

Personally, I believe that people have the equal rights to accept public health care and education, and

it is sensible and fair to arrange that By doing so, citizens’ overall well-being can be guaranteed; hence these educated people are all able to contribute to the country’s development and society’s peace and harmony However, it is not government’s responsibility to pay for a huge population’s college and all the health care spending, since it is not realistic to do so In that case, the charity, or other public organisations can participate in this project as well

Model Answer 3:

As people have paid taxes to the government, it is believed that they should be provided with free healthcare and qualified education However, others disagree with the statement, as they think that each individual should be responsible for his or her own health and education The following essay will discuss about both views in details

On the one hand, many people believe that it is the government’s responsibility to provide standard healthcare and decent education to their people As people have paid income taxes, property taxes, value added taxes and other kinds of fees to the government, these funds should also be beneficial for the people as well Some of the budget should be allocated to fund medical activities and educational programs Having a lot of educated and healthy residents brings many benefits for the government, as there are a lot of skill and productive labors in the country who would develop the country’s

economic sector.

On the other hand, some people believe that health and education is a personal matter as it is the responsibility of each individual to maintain own their health and education They disagree if education and healthcare should be funded from the taxes They think that it is unfair, because some people might be working hard and paid a large amount of taxes, but others might be indolent or jobless and get the same benefits from the government Therefore they believe that healthcare and education should be standalone institutions, and each people should pay for getting good education and maintaining their own health

In conclusion, to a certain point I would agree that it is the government’s task to provide education and healthcare for their people, as some poor people might not be able to get good education and decent healthcare However, although these services might be provided by the government for free, each individual’s must be responsible for their own education and healthcare, as these services are funded by taxes that are paid by the public

17 Do you agree or that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games.

Olympic Games are the world’s most important international athletic competition They bring together thousands of the finest athletes to compete against one another in a variety of individual and team sports Although technology is having an impact on the Olympics in a profound way I disagree that it is reducing the role of Olympic Games I believe that technology allows us to more fully appreciate everything about the competition and the athletes who commit their lives to fulfill their dreams

To begin with, winning an Olympic event is the highest honour people can achieve even in the modern times Unknown athletes get the chance to attain national, and in particular cases, international fame Secondly, Olympic Games are the best medium of cultural exchange even today Different people of different countries, religions, cultures etc get together at Olympics and the participants get a chance to know about other cultures The Games also constitute a major opportunity for the host city and country to showcase themselves to the world

Although the technological realities of the modern times have brought many changes in the Olympic Games of today, they have not reduced the importance of the Olympic Games Technology plays a part in every aspect of these games, from the first torch relay hand-off to the closing ceremonies Athletes and trainers use technology in preparing for the games to optimize their training Sports

equipment manufacturers use design technology to build improved apparatus, gear and more that will enable their clients to deliver a high level performance Broadcasters use technology to better inform viewers of all aspects of the events As a consequence, more and more people are exposed to these games

People who opine that technology has reduced the role of Olympic Games say so because the ugly claws of commercialism have crept into this field also As a result, the Olympics has shifted away from pure amateurism to professionalism The win-at-all-cost attitude has come up and many use unethical means to win They also say that only the rich can afford technology to boost their performance and this creates a gap between the rich and poor I still believe that without inherent ability no amount of technology can make anybody a winner or loser

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, technology has brought colossal changes in The Olympic Games of today but in no way have they decreased the role of Olympic Games

18 Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Yesterday’s fiction is today’s reality Such colossal developments have taken place in agriculture which we could not even think of earlier It is a highly debated issue as to whether these improvements in fertilizers and technology are a blessing or a curse In my opinion, there are both pros and cons of this situation but the advantages are much more than disadvantages

On the positive side, farmers now have a wide range of selection, in terms of seeding, irrigation and use of pesticides and fertilizers Technology has saved people from tedious work and in the mean time increased the production markedly Machines save the cost of labour and also save time, so productivity has increased dramatically All this is needed to meet the demands of the burgeoning population

Furthermore, genetic modification of foods has given us such species which need little or no insecticides and no fertilizers The quality of food has also improved For example, fish gene has been added to tomato to make it frost resistant A nut protein has been added to soya bean to increase the protein content We have more choices and even the colour and shape can also be changed We have sweeter fruits and square watermelons and yellow coloured ones Finally, factory farming, in which animals are fed nicely so as to increase their meat, is also the need of the hour

On the downside, such technology has reduced the need for manpower and many people are now jobless This has a negative effect on communities Genetic modification is also considered unnatural and as it is relatively new, people are also concerned about its long term harmful effects Some methods are also dangerous to environment as there is contamination of the neighbouring crops by the altered gene pool Last but not least, the rich countries can use this technology and further increase the gap between the rich and the poor

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that as every garden has weeds, such developments have their pros and cons We should know where to draw the line and take maximum advantage of this technology minimizing its harmful effects

19 Leisure is a growing industry, but people no longer entertain themselves as much as they used to because the use of modern technology has made them less creative Do you agree or disagree?

I disagree with the statement that people do not entertain themselves as much as they used to because

of modern technology I believe that modern technology has not made people less creative In fact it has changed the definition of leisure and the lifestyle of people

Modern technology has changed our definition of leisure Earlier, leisure meant going out and meeting people, playing outdoor games, going to cinema to watch movies and so on

However, today, leisure time is full of choices We have so many things to do within the four walls of our house We can watch countless programs on national and international channels; we can play online games; we can chat with friends and relatives in any corner of the world; we can do arm-chair tourism by which we can visit any historical place or museum sitting in our arm-chair That is why perhaps it looks as if we people do not entertain ourselves as much as we used to in yesteryears

Another reason why people don’t entertain as much as before is also not because of technology Technology has, in fact, given us more time to enjoy but we can’t strike a balance between work and play We have become workaholics Life in the past was simpler

People worked for basic needs Now work is not just a way of life It is for personal fulfillment We set goals for ourselves such as a house or a car We choose this way of life Now we have improved standard of living but this has come at a very high cost

Finally, I would like to state that the given statement is flawed because nowadays people specially take out time to entertain themselves This can be evident from the mushroom growth of leisure

centres such as hotels, restaurants, fun parks and spas Tourist places are full of people and train and air reservations have to be done well in advance

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, technology has not made us less creative We entertain ourselves more than earlier times but the ways of entertainment are different and technology has given us more choices than before

20 The advantages brought by the spread of English as a “global language” will outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

Presently, English is called a universal language as half of the world population is using it It is the gateway to the world, the ability to speak in English is considered as one of the hallmarks of a cultured person It is undeniable to say that, global language has resulted in both positive and negative effects which must be addressed accordingly

To begin with, there are many benefits of extending a universal language Through global language, a particular country can develop its business relations and increase its economic growth Professionally,

in today’s globalized world, those who are fluent in English have a competitive advantage over other candidates

From the social perspective, English language allows people to enter a wider cultural world, which help in developing healthy relations among them This critical ability is building a foundation for good business and social relations The wide spread use of the English language is narrowing the gap

of communication and people all over the world have accepted English as language to use for communications The books, history and research papers written in this language are really great in number and the spread of this language has made it possible to let people around the world learn the same technology and resources

However, one can not deny the drawbacks which are derived from global language Adopting universal language is leading to westernization of culture Nowadays, people speak global language instead of their own language As a result, they are forgetting their indigenous dialects and culture and their children are following the same For example, Bangladesh is well-known for its culture and traditions all over the world, but, presently, many people have forgotten their culture and language

In conclusion, I would argue that, benefits created by English language far outweigh the disadvantages