1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Are books more important than experienc3

2 142 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 2
Dung lượng 26 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Are books more important than experience?The brain is a large center for the storage of knowledge.. We acquire this knowledge from books or through experience.. To gain knowledge from a

Trang 1

Are books more important than experience?

The brain is a large center for the storage of knowledge Our brain`s capability of responding to the external world is based on our

knowledge We acquire this knowledge from books or through

experience Although these are not the only ones, they are the

fundamental sources of knowledge To gain knowledge from a

book, one has to read the book, comprehend it, and memorize it, while in experience; everything is connected to practice and

memory But generally they both are ways of acquiring knowledge and also, they both can be used effectively depending on the user`s capability of understanding

Based on this I support that gaining knowledge from books is better

Books are the works of writers They are written with full

compliance with established laws When writers write, they would not include matters that are irregular and which sometimes deviate from the laws until an explanation with detailed proof is given But

in experience, one can get quite acquainted with abnormal matters with abnormal matters, which would likely be excluded from books

In experience proof is almost irrelevant A person who observes something to be true many times, he would conclude that it is true without proof

The difference between knowledge gained from experience and knowledge gained from books can be clearly shown by looking at their time consumption Authors have specific knowledge of the subject matter Therefore the content of these books has been

refined and is highly accurate As a result, acquiring knowledge from books requires relatively small time But in experience,

knowledge is gained through trial and error This is highly time consuming since a person has to start all over again when he/she finds his/her knowledge to be inaccurate

In my opinion books are more important sources of knowledge

than experience because they are less likely to be inaccurate

(because they are proven) and require less time

Books avoid that risk that would be taken to gain knowledge from trial and error (experience) Although confined to basic laws, for

Trang 2

those who comprehend well, books could give clues to those matters that are undefined

Ngày đăng: 27/08/2016, 09:05

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN

w