1. Trang chủ
  2. » Ngoại Ngữ

Oil and gas journal volume 109, issue 3

33 672 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 33
Dung lượng 4,65 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Chesapeake of Oklahoma City said its full-year 2010 produc-tion of 2.8 bcfd of gas equivalent marked a 14% increase over its 2009 production.. DRILLING & PRODUCTION Q U IC K TA K E SBP,

Trang 2

5 NEWSLETTER 10 LETTERS / CALENDAR 12 JOURNALLY SPEAKING 14 EDITORIAL 26 EQUIPMENT

Visit our video library

www.ogj.com/index/video.html

CLICK TO VIEW VIDEO

GENERAL INTEREST

Outlooks in four states

in San Bruno line blast probe

Is Iraq going nuclear?

of safety culture, regulation

Bob Tippee

The report by a presidential commission

studying last year’s Macondo well disaster in

the Gulf of Mexico calls for overhaul both of

the oil and gas industry’s safety culture and of

to tighten in next 2 years

Nick Snow

program, excessive reform

Nick Snow

The video below, courtesy of Range Resources Corp., Fort Worth, features a virtual

fi eld tour of the company’s Midcontinent division.

Trang 4

PennWell, Houston offi ce

1455 West Loop South, Suite 400, Houston, TX 77027 Telephone 713.621.9720 / Fax 713.963.6285 Web site: www.ogj.com Editor Bob Tippee, bobt@ogjonline.com

Chief Editor-Exploration Alan Petzet, alanp@ogjonline.com

Chief Technology Editor-LNG/Gas Processing Warren R True, warrent@ogjonline.com

Production Editor Guntis Moritis, guntism@ogjonline.com

Pipeline Editor Christopher E Smith, chriss@ogjonline.com

Senior Editor-Economics Marilyn Radler, marilynr@ogjonline.com

Senior Editor Steven Poruban, stevenp@ogjonline.com

Senior Writer Sam Fletcher, samf@ogjonline.com

Senior Staff Writer Paula Dittrick, paulad@ogjonline.com

Survey Editor/News Writer Leena Koottungal, lkoottungal@ogjonline.com

Publisher Jim Klingele, jimk@pennwell.com

Vice-President/Group Publishing Director Paul Westervelt, pwestervelt@pennwell.com

Vice-President/Custom Publishing Roy Markum, roym@pennwell.com

PennWell, Tulsa offi ce

1421 S Sheridan Rd., Tulsa, OK 74112

PO Box 1260, Tulsa, OK 74101 Telephone 918.835.3161 / Fax 918.832.9290 Presentation/Equipment Editor Jim Stilwell, jims@pennwell.com

Associate Presentation Editor Michelle Gourd, michelleg@pennwell.com

Statistics Editor Laura Bell, laurab@ogjonline.com

Illustrators Mike Reeder, Kay Wayne

Editorial Assistant Donna Barnett, donnab@ogjonline.com

Production Director Charlie Cole

Production Manager Shirley Gamboa

Washington

Tel 703.533.1552 Washington Editor Nick Snow, nicks@pennwell.com

Los Angeles

Tel 310.595.5657 Oil Diplomacy Editor Eric Watkins, hippalus@yahoo.com

PennWell Corporate Headquarters

1421 S Sheridan Rd., Tulsa, OK 74112

P.C Lauinger, 1900-1988

Chairman Frank T Lauinger

President/Chief Executive Offi cer Robert F Biolchini Member Audit Bureau of Circulations & American Business Media

ADVERTISING SALES

Houston

U.S Sales Manager, Marlene Breedlove; Tel: (713)

963-6293, E-mail: marleneb@pennwell.com Regional Sales

Manager, Mike Moss; Tel: (713) 963-6221, E-mail:

mikem@pennwell.com PennWell - Houston, 1455 West

Loop South, Suite 400, Houston, TX 77027 Fax: (713)

963-6228

South / Southwest / Texas / Northwest /

Midwest / Alaska

Marlene Breedlove, 1455 West Loop South, Suite 400,

Houston, TX 77027; Tel: (713) 963-6293, Fax: (713)

963-6228; E-mail: marleneb@pennwell.com

Northeast / Texas / Southwest

Mike Moss, 1455 West Loop South, Suite 400, Houston,

Roger Kingswell, 9 Tarragon Road, Maidstone,

ME16 0UR, United Kingdom; Tel 44.1622.721.222;

Fax: 44.1622.721.333; Email: rogerk@pennwell.com

France / Belgium / Spain / Portugal /

Southern Switzerland / Monaco

Daniel Bernard, 8 allee des Herons, 78400 Chatou,

France; Tel: 33(0)1.3071.1119, Fax: 33(0)1.3071.1119;

E-mail: danielb@pennwell.com

Germany / Austria / Northern Switzerland /

Eastern Europe / Russia / Former Soviet Union

Sicking Industrial Marketing, Kurt-Schumacher-Str 16,

59872, Freienohl, Germany Tel: 49(0)2903.3385.70,

Fax: 49(0)2903.3385.82; E-mail: wilhelms@pennwell.

com; www.sicking.de <http://www.sicking.de> Andreas

Sicking

Japan

e.x.press sales division, ICS Convention Design Inc

6F, Chiyoda Bldg., 1-5-18 Sarugakucho, Chiyoda-ku,

Tokyo 101-8449, Japan, Tel: +81.3.3219.3641, Fax:

81.3.3219.3628; Kimie Takemura, Email:

takemura-kimie@ics-inc.co.jp; Manami Konishi, E-mail:

konishi-manami@ics-inc.co.jp; Masaki Mori, E-mail: masaki.

mori@ics-inc.co.jp

Brazil

Grupo Expetro/Smartpetro, Att: Jean-Paul Prates and

Bernardo Grunewald, Directors, Ave Erasmo Braga

22710th and 11th floors Rio de Janeiro RJ 20024-900

Brazil; Tel: 55.21.3084.5384, Fax: 55.21.2533.4593;

E-mail: jpprates@pennwell.com.br and bernardo@

pennwell.com.br

Singapore / Australia / Asia-Pacific

Michael Yee, 19 Tanglin Road #05-20, Tanglin Shopping

Center, Singapore 247909, Republic of Singapore; Tel: 65

9616.8080, Fax: 65.6734.0655; E-mail: yfyee@singnet.

com.sg

India

Rajan Sharma, Interads Limited, 2, Padmini Enclave,

Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110 016, India; Tel: +91.11

6283018/19, Fax: +91.11.6228 928; E-mail: rajan@

interadsindia.com

Italy

Ferruccio Silvera, Viale Monza, 24 20127 MILANO Italy;

Tel:+02.28.46 716; E-mail: info@silvera.it

Copyright 2011 by PennWell Corporation (Registered in U.S Patent & Trademark Offi ce) All rights reserved Oil & Gas Journal or any part thereof may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, without the prior written permission of the Editor Permission, however, is granted for employees of corporations licensed under the Annual Authorization Service offered by the Copyright Clearance Center Inc (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Mass 01923, or by calling CCC’s Customer Relations Department at 978-750-8400 prior to copying Requests for bulk orders should be addressed to the Editor Oil & Gas Journal (ISSN 0030-1388) is published 12x per year - monthly the fi rst Monday of each month in print and other Mondays in digital form by PennWell Corporation, 1421 S Sheridan Rd., Tulsa, Okla., Box 1260, 74101 Periodicals postage paid at Tulsa, Okla., and at additional mailing offi ces Oil & Gas Journal and OGJ are registered trademarks of PennWell Corporation POSTMASTER: send address changes, letters about subscription service,

or subscription orders to P.O Box 3497, Northbrook, IL 60065, or telephone (800) 633-1656 Change of address notices should be sent promptly with old as well as new address and with ZIP code or postal zone Allow 30 days for change of address Oil & Gas Journal is available for electronic retrieval on Oil & Gas Journal Online (www.ogj.com) or the NEXIS® Service, Box 933, Dayton, Ohio 45401, (937) 865-6800 SUBSCRIPTION RATES in the US: 1 yr $89; Latin America and Canada: 1 yr $94; Russia and republics of the former USSR, 1 yr 2,200 rubles; all other countries: 1 yr $129,

1 yr premium digital $59 worldwide These rates apply only to individuals holding responsible positions in the petroleum industry Single copies

Trang 5

tomorrow’s performance

C O N F E R E N C E & & E X H H I B I B I T I I O N

Owned & Produced by: Flagship Media Sponsors:

Trang 6

International News

for oil and gas professionals

For up-to-the-minute news, visit www.ogjonline.com

Jan 17, 2011

GENERAL INTEREST Q U IC K TA K E S

Marathon Oil to spin off refining, pipeline assets

Marathon Oil Corp will spin off its downstream business,

forming an independent refiner to be named Marathon

Petro-leum Corp based in Findlay, Ohio The parent company,

Mara-thon Oil, will remain in Houston

Gary R Heminger, now Marathon Oil downstream

execu-tive vice-president, will be president and chief execuexecu-tive officer

of Marathon Petroleum Clarence P Cazalot Jr remains

Mara-thon Oil president and chief executive officer MaraMara-thon Oil

expects the transaction to be effective June 30

Refinery locations and capacities to be operated by the

spun-off company are Garyville, La., 464,000 b/d; Catlettsburg, Ky.,

212,000 b/d; Robinson, Ill., 206,000 b/d; Detroit, 106,000 b/d;

Canton, Ohio, 78,000 b/d; and Texas City, Tex., 76,000 b/d

Crude capacity of the Detroit refinery is being expanded by

15,000 b/d in a project that will increase heavy-oil processing

capacity by about 80,000 b/d

Marathon Petroleum also will operate wholesale and retail

operations, including the Speedway retail chain, and Marathon

Pipe Line LLC Through the pipeline subsidiary, the new

com-pany will own, operate, lease, or have ownership interests in

about 9,700 miles of oil and product pipelines

Marathon Oil’s core exploration and production areas are

the US, Equatorial Guinea, Libya, and the North Sea Other

ar-eas in which the company is active include Angola, Indonesia,

the Iraqi Kurdistan region, and Poland

The upstream company also holds a 20% interest in the

Athabasca Oil Sands Project, a joint venture with Shell (60%)

and Chevron (20%) that includes the Muskeg River and

Jack-pine mines, the Scotford upgraders, and more than 215,000

acres of potentially mineable land

Marathon Oil also has an integrated gas unit that includes a

60% interest in a 3.7-million-tonne/year LNG plant and 45% in

a methanol company in Equatorial Guinea

Before the spinoff, Marathon Petroleum plans to borrow

$2.5-3 billion to establish a cash balance of at least $750

mil-lion It will use cash above that level repay intercompany debt

with Marathon Oil Remaining proceeds will be distributed to

Marathon Oil before the spinoff date

JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley will provide a $2.5 billion,

364-day bridge facility The firms also will provide Marathon Petroleum a $2 billion, 4-year revolving credit facility

Before the spinoff, Marathon Oil will reduce its long-term debt by about $2.5 billion through cash on hand and proceeds

of the debt repayment from Marathon Petroleum It will tinue servicing the remaining $5 billion in long-term debt after the spinoff

con-Cheaspeake Energy to cut spending, sell assets

Chesapeake Energy Corp announced plans to reduce its term debt by 25% by substantially reducing leasehold spending and by reducing its 2-year production growth rate to 25% from its previously planned growth rate of 30-40% for 2011-12

long-Aubrey K McClendon, Chesapeake’s chief executive officer, said the latest plan is a shift from Cheaspeake’s “aggressive asset accumulation of the past few years.” The growth plan reduction will be achieved “through asset monetizations,” a news release said.Chesapeake said its 2011-12 strategic plan update will not involve issuing any common or preferred stock to achieve its debt reduction objective Chesapeake reported net debt of $11.4 billion as of Sept 30, 2010

The company did not specify which assets it might sell Chesapeake of Oklahoma City said its full-year 2010 produc-tion of 2.8 bcfd of gas equivalent marked a 14% increase over its 2009 production

US starts 2011 with 1,700 rigs drilling

US drilling activity increased slightly during the first week of

2011, up by 6 rotary rigs to 1,700 working, compared with 1,220 at work a year ago, Baker Hughes Inc reported The US rig count exceeded 1,700 units drilling in 4 of the last 5 weeks

of 2010, finishing the year with 1,694 working the final week

Land operations accounted for the bulk of the latest gain, up

by 5 units to 1,661 working Offshore drilling increased by 1 rig to 25, all in the Gulf of Mexico Inland waters activity was unchanged with 14 rigs drilling

Of the US rigs working, 914 were drilling for natural gas,

5 fewer than the previous week The number drilling for oil increased by 12 to 777 There were 9 rotary rigs unclassified Horizontal drilling increased by 19 to 966 Directional drilling dropped 1 to 211

Among the major producing states, Oklahoma and Colorado

Trang 7

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

Jan 5 Jan 6 Jan 7 Jan 10 Jan 11

WTI CUSHING / BRENT SPOT

NYMEX NATURAL GAS / SPOT GAS - HENRY HUB

IPE GAS OIL / NYMEX HEATING OIL

NYMEX GASOLINE (RBOB)1/ NY SPOT GASOLINE2

IPE BRENT NYMEX LIGHT SWEET CRUDE

PROPANE - MT BELVIEU / BUTANE - MT BELVIEU

1 Reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygen blending

2 Nonoxygenated regular unleaded

Jan 10 Feb 10 Dec 09 Mar 10 Apr 10 May 10 Jun 10 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sept 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10

1,000 800

1,400 1,600 1,800

1,200

400 200 0

BAKER HUGHES INTERNATIONAL RIG COUNT: TOTAL WORLD / TOTAL ONSHORE / TOTAL OFFSHORE 3,900

3,600 3,300 3,000 2,700 2,400 2,100 1,800 1,500 300 0

3,226 2,898 328

Note: End of week average count

BAKER HUGHES RIG COUNT: US / CANADA

Note: Monthly average count

422

12/11/09 11/20/09 12/4/09 12/18/09 1/1/10 10/23/09 11/6/09

12/25/09

1,700

12/24/10 1/7/11 10/29/10

11/13/09 11/27/09 11/12/10 11/26/10 12/10/10

11/19/10 12/3/10 12/17/10 12/31/10 10/22/10 11/5/10

342 1,220

1/8/10 10/30/09

Product supplied, 1,000 b/d

Light sweet crude ($/bbl) 89.53 90.97 –1.44 79.07 10.46 13.2 Natural gas, $/MMbtu 4.53 4.27 0.26 5.77 –1.24 –21.5

1 Based on revised figures 2 OGJ estimates 3 Includes other liquids, refinery processing gain, and unaccounted for crude oil 4 Stocks divided by average daily product supplied for the prior 4 weeks 5 Weekly average of daily closing futures prices.

Source: Energy Information Administration, Wall Street Journal

Trang 8

had the biggest increases in their rig counts, up 4 each to 164

and 64, respectively Texas and Wyoming gained 2 rigs each

with respective counts of 733 and 47 North Dakota increased

by 1 to 151 Pennsylvania, New Mexico, California, and

Ar-kansas were unchanged at 103, 69, 38, and 37, respectively

West Virginia and Alaska were down 1 rig each to 20 and 5

Louisiana reported the biggest loss, down 8 rigs with 168 still

drilling

EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT Q U IC K TA K E S

Shell Todd plans comprehensive review of Maui field

Shell Todd Oil Services Ltd plans a major review of the Maui

gas field region in the Taranaki basin off New Zealand

The JV contracted drillship Noble Discoverer to drill an

exploration well, Ruru-1, on the edge of the field in February

to March It also engaged Electromagnetic Geoservices ASA of

Norway to conduct an electromagnetic survey (New Zealand’s

first) across the Maui field itself

The Ruru prospect, previously known as Hohonu, was

de-lineated in recent years and is believed to have potential to add

large reserves—1 tcf was mentioned unofficially—to the Maui

development Depending on the result of the wildcat well, it

may be developed as a separate project or as an adjunct to the

existing Maui system

Ruru is a fault trap prospect on the southeast boundary of

the Maui production lease and crosses into adjoining permit PEP

381203, also operated by Shell Todd and in which Australian

company OMV has an interest The Eocene-age Kapuni

forma-tion reservoir target is the same as the producing horizon at Maui

The multimillion dollar electromagnetic survey is being run

by the Boa Galatea vessel and is expected to take a month to

complete It will begin with laying a grid of receivers on the

seabed across production lease PEP 381012 before transmitting

electromagnetic waves during the survey

Maui field, discovered in 1969, had initial gas reserves of 3

tcf and once supplied 90% of New Zealand’s demand that

ex-ceeded 200 petajoules/year The field now supplies only about

30% of the current annual market of 150-170 petajoules

However the new exploration initiative indicates Shell Todd

thinks more reserves can be found to prolong the field’s life

and lead to renewing the production lease before it expires in

June 2015

Tweneboa appraisal well confirms potential

The Tweneboa-3 appraisal well on the Deepwater Tano block off

Ghana encountered gas-condensate and confirmed the Greater

Tweneboa area’s resource base potential

The group led by Tullow Oil PLC plans to evaluate

develop-ment options for Tweneboa and Enyenra, formerly Owo, fields

Tweneboa-3 well was drilled with two deviated boreholes

The first leg was drilled to calibrate the potential of an area that

had a weak seismic response This leg encountered 29 ft of

gas-condensate pay, in line with expected results

The well was then sidetracked 1,808 ft west to test an area of strong seismic response This leg encountered a gross vertical reservoir interval of 214 ft and penetrated 112 ft of net gas-condensate pay in high-quality stacked reservoir sandstones in two zones

Tweneboa-3 well is 7.5 miles southeast of the Tweneboa-1 discovery well The Deepwater Millennium dynamically posi-tioned drillship drilled Tweneboa-3 to a total depth of 12,816

ft in 5,253 ft of water The well will be suspended for potential future use in field development

The drillship will remain on the block to drill the top-hole section of the Tweneboa-4 appraisal well and suspend it Then the drillship will drill the Enyenra-2A well, which will appraise the Owo-1 discovery well

Deepwater Tano block interests are Tullow Oil 49.95%, Anadarko Petroleum Corp and Kosmos Energy Inc 18% each, Sabre Oil & Gas Holdings Ltd 4.05%, and Ghana National Pe-troleum Corp has a 10% carried interest

Multizone gas find gauged off Mauritania

A group led by Korea National Oil Corp subsidiary Dana leum has tested gas from one of four separate gas columns in an exploratory well in the Atlantic off Mauritania

Petro-Cormoran-1 is in Block 7 about 2 km south of the late 2003 Pelican-1 gas discovery (see map, OGJ, Oct 23, 2006, p 38)

Cormoran-1’s main purpose was to test the Cormoran pect, which adjoins but lies at a greater depth than Pelican A secondary objective was the Petronia prospect beneath Cormo-ran A further objective was to provide appraisal data on the Pelican gas discovery

pros-Cormoran-1 went to 4,695 m below sea level in 1,630 m

of water It encountered generally thin but good quality bearing sands in the Upper Pelican Group at 3,376-3,420 m true vertical depth subsea (TVD ss) and in the Lower Pelican Group at 3,691-3,711 m TVD ss

gas-The well also encountered good quality gas-bearing sands

in the Cormoran prospect in the gross interval from 4,351 m

to 4,471 m TVD ss and at the top of the Petronia prospect in the gross interval from 4,660 m to 4,695 m TVD ss Drilling stopped at 4,695 m due to elevated pore pressures, and the well was still in gas-bearing reservoir at total depth

The well stabilized at 22-24 MMscfd of gas on a 32∕64-in choke on a drillstem test of the Lower Pelican Group at 3,679-3,712 m TVD ss The flow rate was constrained by the need to avoid sand production Substantially higher flow rates could have been achieved if not for this operational constraint, Dana Petroleum said The company plugged and abandoned the well

so that it can be reentered

Participating interests in Block 7 are Dana Petroleum (E&P) Ltd 36%, GDF Suez Exploration Mauritania BV 27.85%, Tullow Petroleum (Mauritania) Pty Ltd 16.2%, PC Mauritania Pty Ltd 15%, and Roc Oil (Mauritania) Co 4.95%

Trang 9

DRILLING & PRODUCTION Q U IC K TA K E S

BP, CNPC increase production from Iraq’s Rumaila field

Output at Iraq’s giant Rumaila oil field has increased by more

than 10% above the 1.066 million b/d target established in

December 2009, when BP PLC and China National Petroleum

Corp (CNPC) signed a technical service contract to expand

production

“This production increase is an important step for Iraq and

demonstrates the success of the contracts awarded,” said Iraq’s

oil minister Abdul Kareem Luaibi, referring to the contract

awarded to the two firms, along with Iraq’s State Oil Marketing

Co (SOMO)

Management of the field’s development has been carried

out by the Rumaila Operating Organization (ROO), which was

originally staffed by 4,000 employees from Iraq’s state-owned

South Oil Co along with 100 technical experts and managers

from BP and CNPC

BP said that the pace of activity on Rumaila has built

steadily over the past year, with 20 new rigs now mobilized

in the field Altogether over the past year, BP said 41 wells

have been drilled, 103 workovers completed, and 122 km of

flowlines laid Employment has more than doubled to 10,000

workers

On signing the TSC in 2009, BP and CNPC said they

planned to invest $15 billion in cash over the 20 year lifetime of

the contract with the intention of increasing plateau production

to 2.85 million b/d during 2005-10

“Once production has been raised by 10% from its current

level of about 1 million b/d, costs will start to be recovered, and

fees of $2/bbl earned on the incremental oil production,” BP

said at the time

“Increasing production at Rumaila, the world’s fourth

larg-est oilfield, has been a massive undertaking,” said BP Chief

Ex-ecutive Bob Dudley this week, adding that “We look forward to

working with our partners to make Rumaila the world’s second

largest oil field.”

In April 2010, BP let contracts worth about $500 million to

three firms for drilling Schlumberger, in partnership with Iraqi

Drilling Co., received a contract for three rigs; Daqing Drilling

a contract for three rigs; and Weatherford a contract for one rig

(OGJ Online, Apr 5, 2010)

The Rumaila consortium is comprised of BP, 38%, CNPC

37%, and SOMO, 25%

Petrobras approves more FPSOs for Santos basin

Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) approved the installation of

two floating production, storage, and offloading vessels for

in-stallation on Guara Norte and Cernambi presalt Santos basin

oil fields off Brazil

Cernambi previously was known as the Iracema area

The company said the FPSOs are part of the first production

development phase of Guara Norte (Block BMS-09) and

Cer-nambi (Block BMS-11) and will enable early production from

these areas to start in 2014 compared with the previously posed start of after 2014

pro-Each of the vessels will be designed to handle 150,000 bo/d and 8 million cu m/day of gas The company expects to have the units converted and the modules built and integrated in Brazil with a target local content index above 65%

Petrobras is the operator for both blocks and has a 45% terest in BMS-9 and a 65% interest in BMS-11

in-BG Group 30% and Repsol Brasil SA 25% are its partneres

in BMS-9 Its partners in BMS-11 are BG Group 25% and Galp Energia 10%

PROCESSING Q U IC K TA K E S

Albemarle, Petrobras to build HPC plant in Brazil

Albemarle Corp., Baton Rouge, and Brazil’s Petroleo Brazileiro

SA (Petrobras) have signed a memorandum of understanding

to construct a world-scale hydroprocessing catalyst (HPC) duction plant in Santa Cruz, Brazil

pro-The new facility, to be constructed on the site of the two firms’ existing joint venture Fabrica Carioca de Catalisadores

SA (FCC SA), will complement existing production of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) catalysts

The two firms said the new plant will be constructed ahead

of “significant demand growth for hydroprocessing catalysts”

as Brazil begins to implement more stringent specifications for ultralow-sulfur diesel and Petrobras begins to introduce new hydrotreaters to existing and new refineries

Albemarle said it will provide FCC SA with its leading nology for the manufacture of HPC, enabling the production of STARS catalysts, which have enabled the broad implementa-tion of the most stringent sulfur specifications in fuels in North America, western Europe, and Japan

tech-“The plant will be ideally placed to serve growing needs for HPC in South America,” the two firms said

Petrobras and Albemarle said they also are enhancing their partnership by engaging into a joint technical cooperation aimed

at the further development of advanced hydroprocessing lysts

cata-In 2008, UOP LLC signed a technology cooperation ment with Petrobras and Albemarle Corp to demonstrate and further commercialize its catalytic crude upgrading (CCU) pro-cess technology (OGJ Newsletter, Oct 13, 2008)

agree-Last October, Albemarle said it completed the R&D tory facilities and begun construction on its Yeosu, South Korea manufacturing facility, which will begin intermediate commer-cial operations in mid-2011, with the commercial facility being fully operational in 2012

labora-Albemarle said the new site will produce finished catalysts, activators like methylaluminoxane (MAO) and metallocene components, as well as “High Purity Metal Organics for the HBLED market.”

Trang 10

Dominion secures plant site for Marcellus gas

Dominion, Richmond, Va., has reached agreement with PPG

Industries on an option for Dominion to buy land at PPG’s

Na-trium, W.Va., site for construction of a 300 MMcfd natural gas

processing plant

Dominion Transmission, Dominion’s natural gas pipeline

and storage subsidiary, plans to process gas and separate NGLs

at the 56-acre site as part of its previously announced Marcellus

404 Project (OGJ, June 7, 2010, p 52) Engineering design and

project planning for the plant are under way, said the Dominion

announcement; financial terms were not disclosed

The plant will also have fractionation capacity for up to

38,000 b/d of NGLs

Natrium, on the Ohio River in Marshall County about 9

miles north of New Martinsville, W.Va., is close to

Domin-ion’s TL-404 pipeline, an existing transmission line in Ohio

and West Virginia that Dominion plans to convert into wet-gas

service Natrium is also close to rail, pipeline, and barging for

marketing NGLs

Canada’s Montney shale to get gas plant

AltaGas, Calgary, has let a contract to IMV Projects, a Wood

Group company also based in Calgary, for the engineering,

pro-curement, and construction management for the $235 million

(Can.) Gordondale sour gas processing plant and associated gas

gathering

The 120-MMcfd plant will lie about 100 km northwest of

Grande Prairie in the Gordondale area of the Montney shale

gas play It will include deep-cut liquids extraction to recover

NGL before the gas enters the sales gas pipeline and will be on

stream by fourth-quarter 2012, following regulatory approval

IMV Projects has been involved with development of the

project since its inception, performing the original scoping

study and the front-end engineering design, said the company’s

announcement

IMV Projects also designed the expansion of AltaGas Ante

Creek processing plant, currently under construction, that

in-cludes a new amine train, refrigeration, and gathering

Flint Hills to buy ethanol plants in Iowa

Flint Hills Resources LP plans to buy two ethanol plants in

Iowa from Hawkeye Renewables LLC, which last year

restruc-tured its finances under bankruptcy protection

Flint Hills will buy a 100-million-gal/year plant in Iowa

Falls and a 115-million-gal/year plant in Fairbank

The company, part of Koch Industries Inc., has more than

800,000 of distillation capacity in refineries in Texas, Alaska,

and Minnesota

The refiner already owns ethanol plants with capacities of

110 million gal/year each in Menlo and Shell Rock, Iowa

In Iowa, it operates a fuel terminal and asphalt plants at

Al-gona, Davenport, and Dubuque It also distributes fuels in the

state

Flint Hills didn’t disclose the purchase price

TRANSPORTATION Q U IC K TA K E S

Alyeska restarts TAPS while readying bypass

Alyeska Pipeline restarted the Trans Alaska Pipeline Jan 11 following a 4-day shut down The company’s operations con-trol center began the start-up sequence of opening valves and bringing pumps on line at 7 p.m local time (OGJ Online, Jan

10, 2011)

Alyeska shut down the pipeline at 8:50 a.m on Jan 8 after crews discovered a leak into containment in the basement of a booster pump building at Pump Station 1

The restart is part of a multistep plan to restore pipeline operations The pipeline will run at reduced rates for several days while a 157-ft bypass segment is staged for installation Once staged, Alyeska will shut TAPS down again while crews complete the bypass project

The restart will help increase temperatures in tanks and the pipeline, Alyeska explained, reducing the potential for wax in the oil to accumulate or for water in the oil to freeze It also al-lows flowing oil to move a cleaning pig from its current location between Mileposts 419 and 420 to Pump Station 8

The pig could affect the pump station equipment if left in the pipeline too long in cold temperatures With the pipeline operating again, crews can trap the pig between two valves in the mainline and route crude oil around through bypass pip-ing, Alyeska said

Alyeska said the restart solves three problems: It avoids a more complex cold restart process, it avoids additional prob-lems that would occur if the pig were in the line when the pipe-line begins to get too cold, and it allows North Slope producers

to increase production, which will help mitigate freeze cerns on the North Slope

con-Harvest to build Eagle Ford crude oil pipeline

Harvest Pipeline Co has started to construct a 25-mile crude oil pipeline from near Cotulla in LaSalle County, Tex., to an interconnect near Fowlerton, Tex., with its existing 140-mile Pearsall pipeline

The lateral represents the next phase of Harvest’s ing expansion of its Arrowhead Pipeline in an effort to increase shipments of Eagle Ford crude to refining and terminal facili-ties in Corpus Christi

continu-Harvest expects the Cotulla line to enter service in the third quarter The Cotulla line will be supported with volume com-mitments from large producers in LaSalle and Dimmit coun-ties, according to Harvest

Harvest operates pipeline systems running through the gle Ford trend from Maverick County to San Patricio County, Tex

Ea-Harvest also operates oil and gas gathering and mainline systems across south Texas and Louisiana

Koch Pipeline Co LP received shareholder approval to build

a 120,000-b/d Eagle Ford pipeline to Corpus Christi in ber 2010 (OGJ Online, Dec 17, 2010)

Trang 11

org/meetings/index.php

3-4.

NACE Northern Area Western Conference, Regina, Sask., (281) 228-6200, (281) 228-6300 (fax), e-mail:

firstservice@nace.org, website: www.events.

617, website: ictechnologyconference.

www.arct-org/ 7-9.

ARC World Industry Forum, Orlando, (781) 471-1000, e-mail: info@

arcweb.com, website:

www.arcweb.com/

rum-2011/Pages/default.

Events/ARC-Orlando-Fo-aspx 7-10.

International Gas Analysis Symposium & Exhibition, Rotterdam, +31 (0) 15

info@clarion.org, website:

www.clarion.org 14-17.

Unconventional Oil &

Gas Europe, Prague, 1 (888) 299-8016, 1 (888) 299-8057 (fax), e-mail:

registration@pennwell.

com, website: www.

europe.com/index.html

unconventionaloilandgas-15-16.

Russia Offshore Annual Conference & Exhibition, Moscow, +44 207 067

4799 (fax), website:

www.ipaa.org 16.

NAPE Expo, Houston, (972) 993-9090, (972) 993-9191 (fax), e-mail:

info@napeexpo.com, website: www.napeexpo.

com 16-18.

EPNanoNet Forum on Advanced Materials for E&P, Houston, +44 (0)

bettyk@ou.edu, website: www.engr.outreach.

the Middle East Annual

Meeting, Abu Dhabi, +44

IADC South Central

Asia Drilling Technology

Conference & Exhibition,

Mumbai, (713)

292-1945, (713) 292-1946

(fax), e-mail: info@iadc.

org, website: www.iadc.

World Future Energy

Summit, Abu Dhabi,

microsoft.crgevents.com/

GEF2011/microsoft_gef

18.

Chem/Petrochem and Refinery Asset Management and Integrity Conference, New Orleans, (312) 540-

wtgevents.com, website:

www.gtsevent.com

19-20.

ME TECH 2011, Dubai, +44 20 7357 8394, +44

20 7357 8395 (fax), e-mail: conferences@

API Inspection Summit

& Expo, Galveston, Tex., (202) 682 8000, (202) 682-8222 (fax), website:

www.api.org 24-27.

API Exploration and duction Winter Standards Meeting, Fort Worth, Tex., (202) 682-8000, (202) 682-8222 (fax), website: www.api.org

Pro-24-28.

Shale Gas Symposium, Calgary, Alta., (877) 927-

7936, (877) 927-1563 (fax), website: www.

z.nathan@theenergyex- exchange.co.uk/3/13/

http://www.theenergy-articles/214.php 25-27.

Oil Sands Water Management Initiative Conference, Calgary, (866) 921-7782, 1 (800) 714-1359 (fax), e-mail:

ness-conferences.com, website: www.worldoils.

louise@american-busi-com 26-27.

API/AGA Joint Committee

on Oil and Gas Pipeline Welding Practices, Fort Worth, Tex., (202) 682

8000, (202) 682-8222 (fax), website: www.api.

ness-conferences.com, website: www.worldoils.

louise@american-busi-com Jan 30-Feb 1.

Annual Gas Arabia Summit, Abu Dhabi, +44

207 067 18 00, e-mail:

change.co.uk, website:

com Jan 31-Feb 1.

SPE Middle East ventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, +971 4 390 3540, +971

1945, (713) 292-1946 (fax), e-mail: info@iadc.

org, website: www.iadc.

org/conferences 1-2.

Topsides Conference &

Exhibition, Galveston, (918) 831-9160, (918) 831-9161 (fax), e-mail:

wendyl@pennwell.com, website: www.topsidesev-

ent.com/index.html 1-3.

Global LNG Forum, celona, +421 257 272

Bar-112, +421 255 644 490, e-mail; beata.kyblova@

jacobfleming.com, site: www.jacobfleming.

web-com 2-3.

East African Petroleum Conference & Exhibi- tion (EAPCE), Kampala, +256 414 320714, +256

414 320437 (fax), e-mail: eapce11@

petroleum.go.ug website:

rica.com/en/eventdetail.

www.petroleumaf-php?Eventld=522 2-4.

Trang 12

SPE European

Confer-ence on Health Safety

and Environment in Oil

and Gas Exploration,

Shale Gas Asia

Confer-ence, New Delhi, 1 (800)

AOG Australasian Oil &

Gas Exhibition &

Con-petcokes@jacobs.com, website: www.petcokes.

c.pallen@theenergyex-www c.pallen@theenergyex- exchange.co.uk/3/13/

www.theenergy-articles/157.php Feb

27-Mar 1.

MARCH 2011NPRA Security Confer- ence & Exhibition, Houston, (202) 457-

0480, (202) 457-0486 (fax), e-mail: info@npra.

org, website: www.npra.

org 1-2.

Annual Arctic Gas Symposium, Calgary, Alta., (877) 927-7936, (877) 927-1563 (fax), website: www.arcticgas- symposium.com/index.

APPEX/AAPG Property &

Prospect Expo, London, +44 (0) 207 434 13

99, e-mail: Europe@

aapg.org website: www.

europetro.com 1-3.

Turkmenistan Asia Oil &

Gas Summit, Singapore, +44 (0) 20 7328 8899, +44 (0) 20 7624 9030 (fax), e-mail: info@

summittradeevents.com, website: www.summit- tradeevents.com/Hold-

ingA2011.php 3-4.

Libya International Petro

& Energy Fair, Tripoli,

00971 4 2988144,

00971 4 2987886 (fax), e-mail: nafees@orange- fairs.com, website: www.

orangefairs.com 7-10.

API Spring Committee

on Petroleum ment Standards Meeting, Dallas, (202) 682 8000, (202) 682-8222 (fax), website: www.api.gor

Measure-7-10.

CERA Week, Houston, (713) 840-8282, (713) 599-9111 (fax), e-mail:

info@cera.com, website:

www.cera.com 7-11.

Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America, Tampa, (918) 831-9160, (918) 831-9161 (fax), e-mail:

Confer-9513, +44 (0)207 430

9513 (fax), e-mail:

change.co.uk, website:

e.huiban@theenergyex-www.wraconferences.

com/2/4/articles/205.

php 8-11.

DEA(e) Technical Oil &

Gas Conference on Well Control, Bad Bentheim, +44 (0) 1483 598000, e-mail: dawn.dukes@

Confer-www.events.nace.org/

conferences/c2011/in-dex.asp 13-17.

AIChE Spring Meeting

& Global Congress on

Process Safety, Chicago, (800) 242-4363, (203) 775-5177 (fax), website:

ences/springmeeting/

www.aiche.org/confer-index.aspx 13-17.

Offshore West Africa Conference & Exhibition, Accra, Ghana, (918) 831-

9160, (918) 831-9161 (fax), e-mail: registra- tion@pennwell.com, website: www.offshore-

westafrica.com 15-17.

World Heavy Oil gress, Edmonton, Alta., (888) 799-2545, (403) 245-8649 (fax), website:

Con-

www.worldheavyoilcon-gress.com 15-17.

TUROGE Turkish International Oil & Gas Conference & Showcase, Ankara, +44 (0) 20 7596

5000, +44 (0) 20 7596

5111 (fax), e-mail: quiry@ite-exhibition.com, website: www.turoge.

en-com 16-17.

NPRA Annual Meeting, San Antonio, (202) 457-

0480, (202) 457-0486 (fax), e-mail: info@npra.

org, website: www.npra.

org 20-22.

MEOS/SPE’s Middle East Oil & Gas Conference &

Exhibition, Manama, +44 (0)20 7840 2139, +44 (0)20 7840 2119 (fax), e- mail: meos@oesallworld.

com, website: www.

meos2011.com 20-23.

GPA Europe at GasTech Conference & Exhibition, Amsterdam, +44 (0)

1737 855000, +44 (0)

1737 855482 (fax), mail: info@gastech.co.uk, e-mail: www.gastech.

e-co.uk 21-24.

GASTECH International Conference & Exhibition, Amsterdam, +44 (0)

1737 855000, +44 (0)

1737 855482 (fax), mail: info@gastech.co.uk, e-mail: www.gastech.

e-co.uk 21-24.

IADC Drilling HSE Asia Pacific Conference &

Exhibition, Singapore, (713) 292-1945, (713) 292-1946 (fax), e-mail:

Mediter-219418, e-mail: ence@omc.it, website:

confer-www.omc.it/2011 23-25.

SPE Production and Operations Sympo- sium, Oklahoma City, (800) 456-9393, (972) 952-9435 (fax), e-mail:

spedal@spe.org, website:

www.spe.org 27-29.

NPRA International rochemical Conference, San Antonio, (202) 457-

Pet-0480, (202) 457-0486 (fax), e-mail: info@npra.

org, website: www.npra.

org 27-29.

Howard Weil Annual Energy Conference, New Orleans, (504) 582-

ACS National Meeting

& Exposition, Anaheim, Calif., (202) 872-4600, e-mail: help@acs.org, website: www.acs.org

27-31.

Purvin & Gertz tional LPG Seminar, The Woodlands-Houston, (713) 331-4000, (713) 236-8490 (fax), e-mail:

117, (405) 525-3592 (fax), e-mail: amy.

207 596 5135, +44 207

596 5106 (fax), e-mail:

tions.com, website: www.

ilyas.idigov@ite-exhibi-giogie.com/2011/ 29-30.

Offshore Asia Conference

& Exhibition, Singapore, (918) 831-9160, (918) 831-9161 (fax), e-mail:

www.seg.org 30-31.

Trang 13

JOURNALLY SPEAKING

ALAN PETZET

Chief Editor-Exploration

Encana: ‘We own the Piceance’

When listing the public companies that want to be associated with liquids resource plays as opposed

to gas plays, don’t include Encana Corp

The Calgary firm has refocused its operations

on North America and is a large participant in several resource plays in Canada and the US The Piceance basin Williams Fork tight sand and the North Louisiana Haynesville shale are two of the company’s large US ventures

In the Piceance basin, Encana owns 869,000 net acres bounded roughly by Rangely, Grand Junction, Rifle, and Meeker, Colo More than 70%

of the lands are undeveloped

Jeff Wojahn, executive vice-president of cana and president of its USA Division, told an investment conference Jan 5, “We own the basin.”

En-In the 2010 third quarter, Encana at about 3.2 bcfd of companywide gas production was be-hind only ExxonMobil Corp at 4.2 bcfd in North American gas output

Piceance position

At its current pace, Encana has a 35-year inventory

of drilling locations in the Williams Fork formation alone

The company has built its Piceance net tion to 440 MMcfd of gas in 2010 from 325 MMcfd

produc-in 2005, produc-increasproduc-ing flow every year except 2009, when pipeline capacity was insufficient to take all

of its gas Output grew at a compound rate of more than 30%/year from 2002 to 2008

“Our capacity-reduced production from 2009 came back on line better than expected, and many

of the Piceance wells that we’ve recently pleted are performing well above expectations,”

com-Wojahn said

Using what the company calls a “gas factory”

approach, Encana has drilled as many as 52 wells from a single pad in the Piceance basin

“I am proud to say that in just a few short years, the Piceance gas factory has progressed from the conceptual stage to full implementation… Since

2005, Encana has reduced its drilling cycle times by

as much as 65% in some areas of the Piceance basin.”

Encana is expanding the use of its Piceance gas factory approach throughout the company’s op-erations to gain efficiencies Those include sharply

reducing truck trips in the field, fewer pad-to-pad rig moves, shorter drilling and completion cycle time, and optimizing frac efficiency and produc-tion via gas lift

Without giving details, Wojahn said Encana is diversifying its supplier base and is engaging in-dustry players to develop fit for purpose comple-tion equipment

“Though our 2010 program focused on drilling for land retention, we’re nowhere near optimizing our surface or drilling operations,” Wojahn said

“This year we have one gas factory pilot plant that will see eight wells drilled from a single pad This will be the first step in a long-term exercise of continued optimization and cost reduction.”

The company sees overall field savings of as much as 20% when it fully implements the gas factory method in the Haynesville, Wojahn said

Joint venture capital

Encana has attracted more than $4 billion in third party capital to its projects in the last 3 years, Wojahn said

The company targets total joint venture ment of $1-2 billion/year, and current expected

invest-2011 partner spending on Encana’s behalf is about

$500 million A joint venture with China National Petroleum Co could contribute further

Such capital infusion enables Encana to drill wells that would otherwise remain dormant in its inventory for far too long, Wojahn said

In 2010, Encana had more than $900 lion in third party joint venture commitments in place It was involved in more than 30 deals in Canada and had more than 30 partners in the

mil-US The deals involved gross well commitments

of more than 760 wells in Canada and 1,784 wells in the US

Trang 14

OWNED & PRODUCED BY: ORGANIZED BY: OFFICIAL MEDIA PARTNERS:

Trang 15

The spill report—1

First, the shortcomings

The report to US President Barack Obama by the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling has draw-backs As a foundation for further regulatory re-sponse to the Macondo disaster last April, how-ever, it’s important to oil and gas producers It also contains solid ideas for real and obviously neces-sary improvement in offshore safety and regula-tion

The drawbacks will be dispensed with here The solid ideas will receive attention in later weeks

Length and agenda

At nearly 400 pages, the report is unnecessarily long In too many places, historical excursions few will read obscure important messages about the fu-ture Normally, excessive length would be merely annoying In this case, it seems to betray political agendas

For example, the report traces in dreary length the history of the old Minerals Management Ser-vice Created in 1982 by then-Interior Sec James Watt, whose desire to open the whole federal off-shore for oil and gas leasing became a celebrity cause of environmentalism, MMS in its last years had become, even before the Macondo tragedy, a whipping post for the political left

About MMS, only two points need to be made:

1 that combining royalty collection with lease management might have tilted regulation toward revenue generation at the expense of operation-

al safety and therefore might bear on Macondo lapses, and 2 that a post-Macondo reorganiza-tion makes the issue old news These points are easily lost in the spill commission’s retelling of the whole MMS story, which a thousand or so words into the narrative begins to feel like politi-cal scab-picking

Political leanings also seem to be at work in the report’s contention that “systemic failures by indus-try management” beyond BP and its contractors were at play at Macondo The judgment is valid

to the extent that operators routinely provided surances about their abilities to respond to a major deepwater spill that Macondo repudiated

as-Behind those assurances lay a determination, now discredited, not to let such a spill occur But a

catastrophic spill occurred in one deepwater well That fact requires urgent attention and strong re-sponse But no catastrophic spill has occurred from more than 2,500 other deepwater wells drilled since 2006 in the Gulf of Mexico That fact needs

to be part of the response framework The report’s extrapolations skew this essential perspective

From its thusly distorted stance on pre-Macondo regulation and industry practice, the commission leaps to suggestions for impossibly aggressive regu-lation It recommends creation of a new agency in the Department of Interior and new involvement in offshore decision-making by existing agencies out-side the department

Yet the problem isn’t that there hasn’t been enough bureaucracy focused on offshore regula-tion The problem, as the commission report duly notes, is that offshore activity bypassed oversight capability in its volume and technical complexity Oversight needs to improve, to be sure But com-plicating the administrative structures dedicated to oversight will only dissipate resources and hamper activity

The problem at Macondo wasn’t that an cient number of NEPA reviews had been conduct-ed; it was that broad-area assessments contained the standard assurances about response capability that proved unfounded More reviews would have generated more unfounded assurances without preventing the accident

insuffi-The goals now should be to prevent recurrence

of anything like the Macondo accident and to velop spill preparedness hitherto lacking without slowing development of oil and gas resources The report suggests changes able to help the industry and government achieve those goals

de-One such change will be discussed here next week

Trang 16

A d v a n c i n g R e s e r v o i r P e r f o r m a n c e

to an Eagle Ford operator’s drilling plan

An Eagle Ford operator was losing valuable time waiting for frac-water tanks to fill to required volumes, forcing a substantial reduction in the drilling plan The operator considered drilling five new frac-water supply wells, at a cost of USD 1.25 million, to solve this problem

Baker Hughes had a better idea We installed a high-volume Centrilift electric submersible pumping (ESP) system and tripled the frac-water supply well production rate Downtime between completions dropped from 50 to 17 days A second Centrilift ESP on another water-supply well quadrupled its production rate and cut completion wait times to less than 12 days The operator regained its original drilling plan and scheduled to add 36 more wells per year

To learn how we can help you produce more profits from your shale operations, contact your Baker Hughes representative or visit us online You’ll find that partnering with us to maximize the value of your Eagle Ford assets is a very good idea

Ngày đăng: 16/06/2016, 01:02

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN