Pollution Charges Modeling a Product Charge as a Per Unit Tax Policy motivation of a product charge is to induce firms to internalize the externality by taking account of the MEC i
Trang 1Economic Solutions to Environmental Problems: The
Market Approach
Chapter 5
© 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
Trang 2Descriptive Overview
Market approach – an incentive-based policy
that encourages conservative practices or
pollution reduction strategies
Difference between market approach and
command-and-control approach is how each approach attempts
to achieve its objectives
Trang 4Pollution Charges
Pollution charge – a fee that varies with the
amount of pollutants released
“Polluter-pays principle”
Product charge – a fee added to the price of a
pollution-generating product based on its quantity or some attribute responsible for pollution
Trang 5Pollution Charges
Modeling a Product Charge as a Per Unit Tax
Policy motivation of a product charge is to induce
firms to internalize the externality by taking account of
the MEC in their production decisions
Pigouvian tax – a unit charge on a good whose
production generates a negative externality such that
the charge equals the MEC at Q E
Assessing the Model
abate pollution
Trang 6Pollution Charges
Figure 5.1 Implementation of a Pigouvian Tax to Achieve
Efficiency
Trang 7Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Single-Polluter
Case
Emission or effluent charge – a fee imposed directly
on the actual discharge of pollution
Assessing the Model
incentives of the polluter
Trang 8Pollution Charges
Figure 5.2 Modeling an Emission Charge for a Single Firm
Trang 9Pollution Charges
Figure 5.3 Effect of Technology Improvement on a Firm’s
Least-Cost Decision Making
Trang 10Pollution Charges
Modeling an Emission Charge: Multi-Polluter Case
Assessing the Model
Emission charge exploits each polluter’s natural
incentive to pursue a least-cost strategy
Low-cost abaters do most of the cleaning up and
high-cost abaters pay more in taxes to cover the greater damages they cost
Potential increase in monitoring costs
Part of tax burden is shared with consumers in form of
higher prices
Trang 11Pollution Charges
Figure 5.4 Effect of an Emission Charge in a Two-Polluter
Model
Trang 12Pollution Charges
Pollution Charges In Practice
Internationally, pollution charge is most commonly used
market-based instrument
Several countries use effluent charges to control the
noise pollution generated by aircraft
Real-world application of the product charge is one
levied on lubricant oils by Finland, Hungary, and Italy
Trang 13Environmental Subsidies
Two major types of subsidies:
Abatement equipment subsidies
Pollution reduction subsidies
Trang 14Environmental Subsidies
Modeling an Abatement Equipment Subsidy
Abatement equipment subsidy – a payment aimed at
lowering the cost of abatement technology
associated with the consumption of abatement activities
Pigouvian subsidy – a per unit payment on a good
whose consumption generates a positive externality
such that the payment equals the MEB at Q E
Assessing the model
Difficulty measuring the MEB
May bias polluters’ decisions about how best to abate
Trang 15Environmental Subsidies
Modeling a Per Unit Subsidy on Pollution
Reduction
Per unit subsidy on pollution reduction – a payment
for every unit of pollution removed below some determined level
pre- Assessing the Model
in the aggregate
Trang 16Environmental Subsidies
Environmental Subsidies in Practice
Internationally, many countries offer environmental
subsidies in the form of grants or low-interest loans
In the United States, the most common use is federal
funding for publicly owned treatment works
Trang 17Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/refund system – a market instrument
that imposes an up-front charge to pay for
potential damages and refunds it for returning
a product for proper disposal or recycling
Combines the incentive characteristic of a pollution
charge with a built-in mechanism for controlling monitoring costs
Trang 18Deposit/Refund Systems
Economics of Deposit/refund Systems
Intended to force the potential polluter to account for
both the marginal private cost (MPC) and the marginal external cost (MEC) of improper waste disposal
Targets the potential polluter instead of penalizing the
actual polluter
Trang 19Deposit/Refund Systems
Modeling a Deposit/Refund System
Deposit serves the same function as a pollution
charge with the critical difference that the refund helps
to deter improper waste disposal
Assessing the Model
without adding to monitoring and compliance costs
materials
Trang 20Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.5 A Pigouvian Subsidy in the Market for Scrubbers
Trang 21Deposit/Refund Systems
Deposit/Refund Systems in Practice
Beverage container disposal
Disposal of used tire, car hulks, and lead-acid
batteries
Trang 22Deposit/Refund Systems
Figure 5.6 Modeling a Deposit/Refund System in the Market for
Waste Disposal
Trang 23Pollution Permit Trading Systems
Pollution permit trading system – a market
instrument that establishes a market for
rights to pollute by issuing tradeable
pollution credits or allowances
Pollution credits – tradeable permits issued for
emitting below an established standard
Pollution allowances – tradeable permits that
indicate the maximum level of pollution that may be released
Trang 24Pollution Permit Trading Systems
Structure of a Pollution Trading Systems
Two components:
region
polluting sources within that region
Bargaining gives rise to a market for pollution rights
Trang 25Pollution Permit Trading Systems
Modeling a Pollution Permit System for
Multiple Polluters
Incentive to trade as long as two firms face different
MAC levels
Trading will continue until the incentive to do so no
longer exists, at which point, the cost-effective solution is obtained
Assessing the Model
without intervention
Trang 26Pollution Permit Trading Systems
Pollution Trading Systems in Practice
of 1990 establish an allowance-based trading program to control sulfur dioxide emissions