Chuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạngChuyên đề mạng thế hệ mới mạng
Trang 1Multicast on the Internet
CSE 6590
1
28 March 2015
Multicast Addressing
• Class D address (see next slide)
• Source: unicast IP address S Receivers: multicast group ID G, a class-D address
• Each group is identified by (S, G)
• Ethernet broadcast address (all 1’s)
• 2 ways of doing IP multicast at the link layer:
– Link-layer (Ethernet) broadcast – Link-layer (Ethernet) multicast Both cases need filtering at IP layer
2
Trang 2IPv4 Address Formats
3
Multicast Addressing at Link Layer
1 Link-layer (Ethernet) broadcast
•IP multicast packet is encapsulated in an Ethernet broadcast frame and transmitted on the bus.
•Every host picks up the Ethernet frame and does filtering at the IP layer to decide whether to keep or discard the frame.
2 Link-layer (Ethernet) multicast
•Requires a mapping of IP multicast address to an Ethernet multicast address (see next slide).
•There are up to 32 IP class-D addresses mapped to the same Ethernet multicast address.
•The IP module still has to filter out packets for non-member hosts.
4
Trang 3Mapping from Class D IP adress to Ethernet
multicast adress
5
Internet Multicast Service Model
Multicast group concept: use of indirection
• a host “sends” IP datagrams to multicast group
• routers forward multicast datagrams to hosts that have “joined”
that multicast group
6
128.119.40.186
128.59.16.12
128.34.108.63
128.34.108.60
multicast group 226.17.30.197
Trang 4Multicast groups
Class D Internet addresses reserved for multicast:
Host group semantics:
o anyone can “join” (receive from) multicast group
o anyone can send to multicast group
o no network-layer identification to hosts of members
Needed:infrastructure to deliver multicast-addressed
datagrams to all hosts that have joined that multicast group
7
Multicast Protocols
Transport layer
• UDP
• Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP): for multimedia content
• ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP): for bandwidth reservation in a multicast distribution
8
Trang 5Multicast Protocols (2)
Routing, delivery
• On a local network (join/leave):
– Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
– Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD): similar to IGMP but for
IPv6
• Intra-domain (routing):
– MOSPF, PIM, DVMRP
• Inter-domain (routing):
– Multicast Border Gateway Protocol (MBGP)
9
Joining a multicast group: 2-step process
• Local:host informs local multicast router of desire to join group: IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol)
• Wide area:local router interacts with other routers to receive multicast datagram flow
– many protocols (e.g., DVMRP, MOSPF, PIM)
10
IGMP
IGMP
IGMP
wide-area multicast routing
Trang 6IGMP: Internet Group Management Protocol
• Router:sends IGMP query at regular intervals
– hosts belonging to a multicast group must reply to query if
wishing to join or stay in the group
• Host:sends IGMP report (reply) when application wishes to
join a multicast group
– IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP socket option
– hosts need not explicitly “unjoin” group when leaving
11
query report
IGMP
• Router: broadcasts Host
Membership Query message on LAN
• Host: replies with Host
Membership Report message to indicate group membership
– randomized delay before responding – cancel its own report if hearing another – implicit leave via no reply to Query
• Group-specific Query
• Leave Group message – Last host replying to Query can send explicit Leave Group message – Router performs group-specific query to see if any hosts left in group
– Introduced in RFC 2236
• IGMP v3: current version
12
Trang 7IGMP: Summary
• For membership management
• Between a host on a subnet (Ethernet) and the router for the
subnet
• The router periodically broadcast an IGMP host-membership
query message on its subnet.
• A host subscribes to a group replies by multicasting a
host-membership report message.
– Note: feedback implosion uses a random timer.
• The report is sent 3 times (for reliability)
• IGMP-1: hosts send no report leaving the group
IGMP-2: hosts send explicit host-membership leave messages
to reduce leave latency
13
Reverse Path Forwarding
• Building a loop-free broadcast tree
• No knowledge of group membership
14
Trang 8Reverse Path Forwarding (2)
if (multicast datagram received on incoming link on
shortest path back to sender)
then flood datagram onto all outgoing links
else ignore datagram
path from it to sender
15
Reverse Path Forwarding: Example
16
A B
G
D E
c F
Trang 9Spanning-Tree Broadcast
17
A
B
G
D E
c
F
A B
G
D E
c F
(a) Broadcast initiated at A (b) Broadcast initiated at D
Truncated Broadcasting
• Extension of Reverse Path Forwarding
• No members of a group on a subnet leaf router will not forward packets of this group to the subnet (pruning)
• But does not reduce traffic in the core network
• More efficient multicast routing is needed!!!
18
Trang 10Internet Multicasting Routing: DVMRP
• DVMRP: distance vector multicast routing protocol,
RFC1075.
• Flood and prune: reverse path forwarding,
source-based tree.
– initial datagram to multicast group is flooded
everywhere via RPF
– routers not wanting the multicast data: send
prune messages to upstream neighbors
19
DVMRP Example
R1 R2
R3
R4
R5 R6 R7
2 1
6
3 4
5
i
router with attached group member router with no attached group member
link used for forwarding,
i indicates order link added by algorithm
LEGEND S: source
20
Trang 11DVMRP Details
• Soft state:DVMRP router periodically (1 min.) “forgets” that
branches are pruned:
– multicast data again flows down unpruned branches
– downstream routers: reprune or else continue to receive
data
• Routers can quickly re-graft to tree following an IGMP join at
a leaf router by sending a “graft” message upstream
• Deployment:
– commonly implemented in commercial routers
– Mbone routing done using DVMRP
• Works well in small autonomous domains
21
DVMRP: Summary
• Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol
• Leaf router sends a prune message to neighbouring routers
when there is no group member on the subnet
• Intermediate routers perform pruning whenever possible
• Flooding and pruning are repeated periodically, when the current state times out
• Between flooding rounds, a leaf router can re-join a group by
sending a graft message upstream.
• Intermediate routers propagates the graft message upstream until the path is re-connected
22
Trang 12Multicast Routing Approaches
• Minimum cost trees
– Steiner trees
• Shortest path trees
– Source-based trees
– Core-based trees
…we first look at basic approaches, then specific protocols
adopting these approaches
23
Steiner Trees
• Steiner Tree:minimum cost tree connecting all routers with attached group members
• Problem is NP-complete
• Excellent heuristics exist
• Not used in practice:
– computational complexity
– information about entire network needed
– monolithic: rerun whenever a router needs to join/leave
24
Trang 13Shortest Path Tree
• Multicast cast forwarding tree: tree of shortest path routes
from source to all receivers
– Dijkstra’s algorithm
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5 R6 R7
2 1
6
3 4
5
i
router with attached group member router with no attached group member
link used for forwarding,
i indicates order link added by algorithm
LEGEND S: source
25
MOSPF
• Extends OSPF for multicasting
• Every router has the complete topology of its autonomous system
• A receiver joins a multicast group G by exchanging IGMP messages with its end-router R
• The end-router R broadcasts its group membership to the whole network in the form (G, R)
• Every router in the network maintains a group membership table with each entry being a tuple [S, G, <R1, R2, …>]
• A sender simply sends data packets as they are available
• Each router uses the network topology, the group membership table, and the multicast group ID in the data packets to compute the route(s) to the destination(s)
26
Trang 14Core-Based Trees
• For many-to-many multicast
• Protocols: CBT, PIM-SM, PIM-DM (Protocol Independent
Multicast, sparse/dense mode)
• Purpose: to reduce the amount of routing info stored at
routers when a multicast group has a large number of
members and multiple senders
• A multicast group requires a core (rendez-vous point)
• Receivers “join” the (shortest-path) tree rooted at the core
only one tree per multicast group (used for multiple senders)
• Sources send multicast data to the core, which then
multicasts the data to the tree
27
MBone
• Multicast backbone of the Internet
• Not all routers support multicast routing protocols and IGMP
• Connecting multicast-capable routers using (virtual) IP tunnels
• Was a long-running experimental approach to enabling multicast between sites through the use of tunnels
• No longer operational
28
Trang 15References
• Multicasting on the Internet and Its Applications, Sanjoy Paul,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998, chapters 2, 4, 5
• Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach, 5thedition,
Kurose and Ross
29