1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kinh Doanh - Tiếp Thị

human resources management _ section 5-performance management and appraisal

45 281 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 45
Dung lượng 2,25 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

– Distinguish between performance management PM and performance appraisal PA, and between job criteria and – Discuss why people stay or leave a company, and how to retain them... • Qua

Trang 2

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–2

Learning Objectives

After you have studied this section, you should be able to:

– Identify the components of performance management systems – Distinguish between performance management (PM) and

performance appraisal (PA), and between job criteria and

– Discuss why people stay or leave a company, and how to retain them

Trang 3

Nature of Performance Management

Performance

– What an employee does and does not do

• Quantity of output • Quality of output

• Timeliness of output • Presence at work

• Cooperativeness

Performance Management

– Processes used to identify, encourage, measure, evaluate, improve, and reward employee performance

• Provide information to employees about their performance

• Clarify organizational performance expectations

• Identify the development steps that are needed to enhance employee

Trang 4

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–4

Performance Management Linkage

Figure 11–1

Trang 5

Components of

Trang 6

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–6

Potential Performance Criteria Problems

Objectivity

Performance Criteria

Trang 7

Types of Performance Information

Trang 8

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–8

Identifying and measuring employee performance:

Performance standards vs Job criteria

 Job Criteria

– Important elements in a given job

Trang 9

Performance Standards

 Performance Standards

– Expected levels of performance

• Benchmarks, goals, and targets

– Characteristics of well-defined standards

• Realistic

• Measurable

• Clearly understood

Trang 10

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–10

Terms Defining Standards on One Company

Figure 11–2

Trang 11

Uses of Performance Appraisal

 Performance Appraisal (PA)

– The process of evaluating how well employees

perform their jobs when compared to a set of

standards, and then communicating the information

Trang 12

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–12

Difference Between Performance Management and Performance Appraisals

– The process of evaluating how well employees perform their jobs and then communicating that information to the

employees

Trang 13

Difference Between Performance Management and Performance Appraisals

Trang 14

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–14

Conflicting Uses for Performance Appraisal

Figure 11–4

Trang 15

Developmental Uses of Performance Appraisal

Performance Appraisal

Trang 16

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–16

Typical Division of HR Responsibilities

for Performance Appraisal

Figure 11–4

Trang 17

Discussion

not appraised accurately?

2 Which HR activities can use the results of

performance appraisal as their information

inputs?

appraise his/her subordinates?

Trang 18

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–18

Who Conducts Appraisals?

 Supervisors who rate their subordinates

 Employees who rate their supervisors

 Team members who rate each other

 Outside sources rating employees

 Employees’ self-appraisal

 Multisource (360° feedback) appraisal

Trang 19

Traditional Performance Appraisal:

Logic and Process

Trang 20

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–20

Employee Rating of Managers

– Subordinates’ fear of reprisals may inhibit them from giving realistic

(negative) ratings – Ratings are useful only for self-improvement purposes

Trang 21

– Peers have opportunity to

observe other peers

– Peer appraisals focus on

– Organizational use of individual performance appraisals can hinder the development of teamwork

Trang 22

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–22

Trang 23

Performance Appraisal Methods

Trang 24

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–24

Category Rating Methods

Graphic Rating Scale

– A scale that allows the rater to indicate an employee’s performance on a continuum of job behaviors

– Aspects of performance measured:

• Descriptive categories, job duties, and behavioral

dimensions

• Behavioral rating scales (e.g., BARS)

– Drawbacks

• Restrictions on the range of possible rater responses

• Differences in the interpretations of the meanings of scale

items and scale ranges by raters

• Poorly designed scales that encourage rater errors

• Rating form deficiencies limit effectiveness of the appraisal

Trang 25

Sample Performance Appraisal Form

Trang 26

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–26

Terms Defining Standards at One Company

Figure 11–9

Trang 27

Category Rating Methods (cont’d)

Checklists

– A performance appraisal tool that uses a list of

statements or work behaviors that are checked by raters

• Can be quantified by applying weights to individual

checklist items

– Drawbacks

• Interpretation of item meanings by raters

• Weighting creates problems in appraisal interpretation

Trang 28

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–28

Trang 29

Comparative Methods (cont’d)

Forced Distribution

– Performance appraisal method in which ratings of

employees are distributed along a bell-shaped curve – Drawbacks

• Assumes a normal distribution of performance

• Resistance by managers to placing individuals in the

lowest or highest groups

• Providing explanation for placement in a higher or lower

grouping can be difficult

• Is not readily applicable to small groups of employees

Trang 30

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–30

Forced Distribution on a Bell-Shaped Curve

Figure 11–9

Trang 31

• Variations in how managers define a “critical incident”

• Time involved in documenting employee actions

• Most employee actions are not observed and may become

different if observed

• Employee concerns about manager’s “black books”

Trang 32

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–32

Narrative Methods (cont’d)

– Manager writes a short essay describing an

employee’s performance

– Drawbacks

• Depends on the managers’ writing skills and their

ability to express themselves

Trang 33

Behavioral/Objective Methods

– Assesses employees’ behaviors instead of other

characteristics

– Consists of a series of scales created by:

• Identifying important job dimensions

• Creating statements describing a range of desired and

undesirable behaviors (anchors)

– Types of behavioral scales

• Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)

• Behavioral observation scales (BOS)

Trang 34

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–34

Figure 11–10

Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale

for Customer Service Skills

Trang 35

Criticisms of Performance Appraisal

 Focus is too much on the

individual and does little to

develop employees

 Employees and supervisors

believe the appraisal process is

Trang 36

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–36

Common Rater Errors

Figure 11–11

Trang 37

Training of Managers and Employees

 Appraisal Training Topics:

– Appraisal process and timing

– Performance criteria and job standards that should

Trang 38

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–38

Training of Managers and Employees (cont’d)

 Effective Performance Management Systems

(PMS) are:

– Consistent with the strategic mission of the organization – Beneficial as development tool:

• Review process to prevent undue control of careers

• Counseling to help poor performers improve

– Useful as an administrative tool:

• Formal evaluation criterion that limit managerial discretion

• Formal rating instrument linked to job duties and

responsibilities

– Legal and job-related (Appraisal criteria based on job analysis)

– Viewed as generally fair by employees

– Effective in documenting employee performance

Trang 39

Feedback as a System

of Data

Feedback System

Trang 40

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved

Creating Effective Performance Management

Systems

Trang 41

Individual Employee Performance

 Individual employee performance is the key in organizational performance management 

Understanding it helps managers to deliver

appropriate performance rewards and

development to employees

 Individual Performance Factors

– Individual ability to do the work

– Effort level expended

– Organizational support

Trang 42

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–42

Components of Individual Performance

Figure 3–5

Trang 43

Retention of Human Resources

 Why People Stay or Leave—Links, Fit, and

Sacrifice

– Culture and Values

• Positive, distinctive company that is well-managed, and

offers exciting challenges

– Attractive Job

• Freedom and autonomy, exciting challenges, and

career advancement and growth

– Compensation and lifestyle

• Differentiated pay package, high total compensation,

Trang 44

© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–44

Drivers of Retention

Figure 3–6

Trang 45

Some Characteristics of People and Jobs

Ngày đăng: 28/11/2014, 15:17

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN