– Distinguish between performance management PM and performance appraisal PA, and between job criteria and – Discuss why people stay or leave a company, and how to retain them... • Qua
Trang 2© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–2
Learning Objectives
After you have studied this section, you should be able to:
– Identify the components of performance management systems – Distinguish between performance management (PM) and
performance appraisal (PA), and between job criteria and
– Discuss why people stay or leave a company, and how to retain them
Trang 3Nature of Performance Management
Performance
– What an employee does and does not do
• Quantity of output • Quality of output
• Timeliness of output • Presence at work
• Cooperativeness
Performance Management
– Processes used to identify, encourage, measure, evaluate, improve, and reward employee performance
• Provide information to employees about their performance
• Clarify organizational performance expectations
• Identify the development steps that are needed to enhance employee
Trang 4© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–4
Performance Management Linkage
Figure 11–1
Trang 5Components of
Trang 6© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–6
Potential Performance Criteria Problems
Objectivity
Performance Criteria
Trang 7Types of Performance Information
Trang 8© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–8
Identifying and measuring employee performance:
Performance standards vs Job criteria
Job Criteria
– Important elements in a given job
Trang 9Performance Standards
Performance Standards
– Expected levels of performance
• Benchmarks, goals, and targets
– Characteristics of well-defined standards
• Realistic
• Measurable
• Clearly understood
Trang 10© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–10
Terms Defining Standards on One Company
Figure 11–2
Trang 11Uses of Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal (PA)
– The process of evaluating how well employees
perform their jobs when compared to a set of
standards, and then communicating the information
Trang 12© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–12
Difference Between Performance Management and Performance Appraisals
– The process of evaluating how well employees perform their jobs and then communicating that information to the
employees
Trang 13Difference Between Performance Management and Performance Appraisals
Trang 14© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–14
Conflicting Uses for Performance Appraisal
Figure 11–4
Trang 15Developmental Uses of Performance Appraisal
Performance Appraisal
Trang 16© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–16
Typical Division of HR Responsibilities
for Performance Appraisal
Figure 11–4
Trang 17Discussion
not appraised accurately?
2 Which HR activities can use the results of
performance appraisal as their information
inputs?
appraise his/her subordinates?
Trang 18© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–18
Who Conducts Appraisals?
Supervisors who rate their subordinates
Employees who rate their supervisors
Team members who rate each other
Outside sources rating employees
Employees’ self-appraisal
Multisource (360° feedback) appraisal
Trang 19Traditional Performance Appraisal:
Logic and Process
Trang 20© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–20
Employee Rating of Managers
– Subordinates’ fear of reprisals may inhibit them from giving realistic
(negative) ratings – Ratings are useful only for self-improvement purposes
Trang 21– Peers have opportunity to
observe other peers
– Peer appraisals focus on
– Organizational use of individual performance appraisals can hinder the development of teamwork
Trang 22© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–22
Trang 23Performance Appraisal Methods
Trang 24© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–24
Category Rating Methods
Graphic Rating Scale
– A scale that allows the rater to indicate an employee’s performance on a continuum of job behaviors
– Aspects of performance measured:
• Descriptive categories, job duties, and behavioral
dimensions
• Behavioral rating scales (e.g., BARS)
– Drawbacks
• Restrictions on the range of possible rater responses
• Differences in the interpretations of the meanings of scale
items and scale ranges by raters
• Poorly designed scales that encourage rater errors
• Rating form deficiencies limit effectiveness of the appraisal
Trang 25Sample Performance Appraisal Form
Trang 26© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–26
Terms Defining Standards at One Company
Figure 11–9
Trang 27Category Rating Methods (cont’d)
Checklists
– A performance appraisal tool that uses a list of
statements or work behaviors that are checked by raters
• Can be quantified by applying weights to individual
checklist items
– Drawbacks
• Interpretation of item meanings by raters
• Weighting creates problems in appraisal interpretation
Trang 28© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–28
Trang 29Comparative Methods (cont’d)
Forced Distribution
– Performance appraisal method in which ratings of
employees are distributed along a bell-shaped curve – Drawbacks
• Assumes a normal distribution of performance
• Resistance by managers to placing individuals in the
lowest or highest groups
• Providing explanation for placement in a higher or lower
grouping can be difficult
• Is not readily applicable to small groups of employees
Trang 30© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–30
Forced Distribution on a Bell-Shaped Curve
Figure 11–9
Trang 31• Variations in how managers define a “critical incident”
• Time involved in documenting employee actions
• Most employee actions are not observed and may become
different if observed
• Employee concerns about manager’s “black books”
Trang 32© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–32
Narrative Methods (cont’d)
– Manager writes a short essay describing an
employee’s performance
– Drawbacks
• Depends on the managers’ writing skills and their
ability to express themselves
Trang 33Behavioral/Objective Methods
– Assesses employees’ behaviors instead of other
characteristics
– Consists of a series of scales created by:
• Identifying important job dimensions
• Creating statements describing a range of desired and
undesirable behaviors (anchors)
– Types of behavioral scales
• Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)
• Behavioral observation scales (BOS)
Trang 34© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–34
Figure 11–10
Behaviorally-Anchored Rating Scale
for Customer Service Skills
Trang 35Criticisms of Performance Appraisal
Focus is too much on the
individual and does little to
develop employees
Employees and supervisors
believe the appraisal process is
Trang 36© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–36
Common Rater Errors
Figure 11–11
Trang 37Training of Managers and Employees
Appraisal Training Topics:
– Appraisal process and timing
– Performance criteria and job standards that should
Trang 38© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–38
Training of Managers and Employees (cont’d)
Effective Performance Management Systems
(PMS) are:
– Consistent with the strategic mission of the organization – Beneficial as development tool:
• Review process to prevent undue control of careers
• Counseling to help poor performers improve
– Useful as an administrative tool:
• Formal evaluation criterion that limit managerial discretion
• Formal rating instrument linked to job duties and
responsibilities
– Legal and job-related (Appraisal criteria based on job analysis)
– Viewed as generally fair by employees
– Effective in documenting employee performance
Trang 39Feedback as a System
of Data
Feedback System
Trang 40© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved
Creating Effective Performance Management
Systems
Trang 41Individual Employee Performance
Individual employee performance is the key in organizational performance management
Understanding it helps managers to deliver
appropriate performance rewards and
development to employees
Individual Performance Factors
– Individual ability to do the work
– Effort level expended
– Organizational support
Trang 42© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–42
Components of Individual Performance
Figure 3–5
Trang 43Retention of Human Resources
Why People Stay or Leave—Links, Fit, and
Sacrifice
– Culture and Values
• Positive, distinctive company that is well-managed, and
offers exciting challenges
– Attractive Job
• Freedom and autonomy, exciting challenges, and
career advancement and growth
– Compensation and lifestyle
• Differentiated pay package, high total compensation,
Trang 44© 2005 Southwestern College Publishing All rights reserved Lan Anh 11–44
Drivers of Retention
Figure 3–6
Trang 45Some Characteristics of People and Jobs