These Key Performance Indicators KPIs are some of the operational metrics that are fundamental to defining workforce productivity: • 58% increase in employee responsiveness to others – 2
Trang 1Mobility for the SMB
March 2008
Trang 2Executive Summary
Research Benchmark Aberdeen’s Research Benchmarks provide an in-depth and comprehensive look into process, procedure, methodologies, and technologies with best practice identification and actionable recommendations
Aberdeen’s research shows that while enterprise mobility has made
significant inroads in organizations and more importantly, is having a
measurable impact on the productivity of an organization’s workforce, there
is still much room for growth and maturation in the SMB space
Best-in-Class (BIC) SMBs are leveraging their mobility solutions as an integrated
part of their overall business strategy The findings are drawn from an
October / November 2007 survey of almost 300 organizations
Best-in-Class Performance
Aberdeen used three key performance criteria to distinguish Best-in-Class
SMBs from all other organizations These Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
are some of the operational metrics that are fundamental to defining
workforce productivity:
• 58% increase in employee responsiveness to others – 27% better
than the Industry Average
• 53% increase in an employee’s ability to gain knowledge / data from
others – 54% better than all other organizations
• 63% increase in the flexibility of the workforce – 36% better than
the Industry Average
Competitive Maturity Assessment
Survey results show that Best-in-Class SMBs shared several common
characteristics:
• Best-in-Class SMBs are 47% more likely than Laggards to have IT
staff in place to test new mobility initiatives
• Best-in-Class SMBs are 26% more likely than all other SMBs to have
help desk staff trained on mobility solutions
• Best-in-Class SMBs are 41% more likely than Laggards to monitor
their mobility policies
Required Actions
In addition to the specific recommendations in Chapter Three of this
report, to achieve Best-in-Class performance, companies must:
• Standardize mobile device options
• Secure mobile devices and their content
• Develop processes to evaluate new mobility initiatives
Trang 3Table of Contents
Executive Summary 2
Best-in-Class Performance 2
Competitive Maturity Assessment 2
Required Actions 2
Chapter One: Benchmarking the Best-in-Class 4
SMB and Enterprise Mobility Are Not The Same 4
The Maturity Class Framework 5
The Best-in-Class PACE Model 6
The Returns from Best-in-Class Performance 6
Mobility is Driven by its Underlying Components 7
Chapter Two: Benchmarking Requirements for Success 9
Competitive Assessment 9
Capabilities and Enablers 11
Chapter Three: Required Actions 13
Laggard Steps to Success 14
Industry Average Steps to Success 14
Best-in-Class Steps to Success 14
Appendix A: Research Methodology 16
Appendix B: Related Aberdeen Research 18
Figures Figure 1: Key Pressures Driving SMBs to Leverage Mobile Solutions 4
Figure 2: Investing in Mobility Impacts the Top and Bottom Lines 6
Figure 3: Best-in-Class Actions for SMBs to Improve the Mobility of Their Workforces 7
Figure 4: Top 5 Deployed Mobile Applications 12
Figure 5: Top Key Performance Indicators for SMB Mobility 13
Tables Table 1: Companies with Top Performance Earn Best-in-Class Status 5
Table 2: The Best-in-Class PACE Framework 6
Table 3: Key Considerations within a Mobile Strategy 7
Table 4: The Competitive Framework 10
Table 5: The PACE Framework Key 17
Table 6: The Competitive Framework Key 17
Table 7: The Relationship Between PACE and the Competitive Framework .17
Trang 4Chapter One:
Benchmarking the Best-in-Class
SMB and Enterprise Mobility Are Not The Same
Fast Facts
√ On average, SMBs state that
46% of their workforce is
considered mobile
√ 96% of SMBs believe that
smartphones have improved the performance of their workforce
√ 66% of SMBs have
increased the proportion of
their IT budgets spent on mobility over the last two years
Aberdeen's November 2007 study, The 2008 Enterprise Mobility Benchmark
Report, showed that the number one reason organizations were developing
a mobility strategy was to manage an increasingly decentralized workforce
This was in contrast with the research Aberdeen had conducted 12 months
earlier that found the number one driver was the need to respond to
customer needs more quickly While SMBs share the same #1 pressure as
do enterprises, it is interesting to note the differences Small and Medium
Business (SMB) face as compared to enterprise organizations Specifically,
while one in three organizations in the November 2007 study stated that
reducing operational costs was a key driver, Aberdeen’s data shows that
SMBs vary greatly in terms of how they prioritize reducing operational
costs The smallest organizations, those under $50 million, are some of the
most costs conscious organizations in the market, ensuring that every
expense is not only justified but optimized, as they strive to make the jump
to their next financial milestone (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Key Pressures Driving SMBs to Leverage Mobile
Solutions
21%
48%
31%
15%
38%
19%
47%
35%
30%
23%
13%
58%
38%
15%
21%
Competition for new customers
Manage a decentralized workforce
Increased number of remote workers
Geographic expansion of customer base
Reduce operational costs
% of Respondents
$0 - 50m $50 - 100m $100 - 250m
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008 The data also shows an interesting difference between the three tiers of
SMBs in terms of how they rank the importance of “competition for new
customers.” Specifically, it is worth noting how much more important the
geographic expansion of the customer base is to organizations with $50 –
100m in revenues versus the other two SMB groups Often, organizations
that have reached $50 – 100 million in revenues are in the interesting
position where the addressable local or national customer base may be
Trang 5Fast Facts
√ 80% of Best-in-Class SMBs
either already have in place
or plan to implement policies
to standardize their employees’ mobile device options
√ 61% of Best-in-Class SMBs
have a mobility “guru” on staff
√ 72% of Best-in-Class SMBs
are using or have budgeted for 3G wireless data cards
maturing to the point where higher growth rates can only come from
(inter)national expansion The increasingly geographically diverse customer
base inevitably requires one’s workforce to travel greater distances more
frequently, meaning they will be away from their offices (and the data that
can most easily be accessed from those offices) for greater periods of time
This increased travel drives an even greater need to ensure that employees
can access data anytime and anywhere That connectivity – particularly
when facing international roaming charges - can significantly increase the
costs of doing business
The Maturity Class Framework
The value of any solution – let alone a mobile solution – must be tied to the
quantifiable results it can deliver to an organization While there are
pockets of tangible and measurable value in enterprise mobility (e.g.: time
savings from the adoption of mobile field service solutions), it is far more
difficult to develop a meaningful ROI for more widespread horizontal
mobility solutions such as mobile email Aberdeen used three key
performance criteria to distinguish Best-in-Class organizations from Industry
Average and Laggard organizations These KPIs are some of the
time-sensitive operational metrics most frequently touted as key factors in
measuring an organization’s (and its employees’) effectiveness and
productivity: (1) responsiveness to others; (2) ability to gain knowledge /
data from others; and (3) the overall flexibility of an organization’s
workforce Table 1 summarizes Aberdeen’s findings and defines
Best-in-Class performance for this study
Table 1: Companies with Top Performance Earn Best-in-Class
Status
Definition of
Best-in-Class:
Top 20% of aggregate
performance scorers
̇ 58% increase in employee responsiveness to others
̇ 53% increase in an employee’s ability to gain knowledge /data from others
̇ 63% increase in the flexibility of the workforce
Industry Average:
Middle 50% of
aggregate performance
scorers
̇ 46% increase in employee responsiveness to others
̇ 41% increase in an employee’s ability to gain knowledge /data from others
̇ 47% increase in the flexibility of the workforce
Laggard:
Bottom 30% of
aggregate performance
scorers
̇ 19% increase in employee responsiveness to others
̇ 18% increase in an employee’s ability to gain knowledge /data from others
̇ 23% increase in the flexibility of the workforce
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008
Trang 6The Best-in-Class PACE Model
Using applications and technologies to drive enhanced workforce
productivity and further enterprise mobility to ultimately achieve the
Best-in-Class performance in Table 1 requires a combination of strategic actions,
organizational capabilities, and enabling technologies (Table 2)
Table 2: The Best-in-Class PACE Framework
̇ Managing a
decentralized
workforce
̇ Streamline business
processes
̇ Develop systems for global access to
information
̇ Policies for appropriate use of devices
̇ Policies for appropriate use of wireless data services
̇ Procedural controls in regards to enterprise mobility (Sarbanes Oxley, etc.)
̇ Processes to evaluate new mobility projects
̇ Mobile VPNs
̇ Mobile VoIP
̇ Wireless data cards / 3G plans
̇ WiFi enabled smart-phones
̇ Mobile PBX integration
̇ Mobile IM / collaboration Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008
The Returns from Best-in-Class Performance
Figure 2 shows how a policy driven strategy for mobility for SMBs directed
at enhancing workforce productivity can provide tremendous benefits to an
organization Best-in-Class SMBs invested, on average, almost 65% more
than all other SMBs invested on mobile solutions That upfront investment
has paid off handsomely over the last 12 months In fact, the larger
investments in mobility translated into a 222% relative increase in top
line revenue and in the overall profitability of the organization
"We really haven't gone into it but considerations are
underway though the later part
of the year as we streamline our operations from Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore."
~ Business Process Manager, Asia/Pacific transportation
company
Figure 2: Investing in Mobility Impacts the Top and Bottom Lines
9%
9%
7%
29%
29%
11%
Increase in
profitability over last
12 months
Increase in
revenues over last
12 months
% of company wide
budget spent on
mobility
All Others Best-in-Class SMBs
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008
To achieve that performance, the Best-in-Class actions in Table 2 show that
top performing SMBs place the most emphasis on leveraging their
technology enablers as a means to provide global access to information (i.e
provide the mobile workforce the information they need when they need it)
Trang 7to enhance that productivity Figure 3 illustrates how Best-in-Class SMBs
strategically approach the challenges illustrated in Figure 1
Figure 3: Best-in-Class Actions for SMBs to Improve the Mobility
of Their Workforces
31%
31%
35%
35%
39%
Increase workforce collaboration
Create a borderless office
Deliver prompt customer service
Streamline business processes
Provide global access to information
% of Best-in-Class SMBs
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008
Mobility is Driven by its Underlying Components
While taking the most appropriate actions is key to any successful strategy,
the old adage that “the devil is in the details” holds particularly true in
mobility Aberdeen surveyed SMBs not only on the maturity of their mobile
initiatives, but also on the scope of their initiatives– specifically looking at
the factors they included in their mobility strategy A complete mobile
strategy must cover a broad set of factors, including: back-office hardware /
software, end-user devices / platforms, and appropriate usage and
procurement / payment policies
Table 3: Key Considerations within a Mobile Strategy
Best-in-Class SMBs
All Other SMBs
Security policies for enterprise mobility 72% 51%
"We are still struggling with the performance of the applications
we are using on our devices
We need to review what applications are being deployed and who should be required to use them vs who can use them optionally."
~ Senior Executive,
US High Tech company
Trang 8Best-in- All Other
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008 What the above table highlights is that SMB mobility must be driven by both
a top down (i.e., proper strategic planning) and a bottom up approach (i.e.,
proper tactical execution) Mobility is in fact, less about the devices that are
being used (although that certainly is an important component of the
equation), and more about how those devices are being used, managed,
secured and paid for
Aberdeen Insights - Strategy
SMBs need to take a holistic approach to mobility and understand the
importance of a complete strategic vision and total visibility around their
mobile initiatives, whether it be regarding devices, applications, security, or
even the carriers selected The fact that Best-in-Class organizations
consider more facets of mobility in their mobility strategy is directly linked
to the fact that as mobility becomes strategic to an organization, more
senior executives are involved in the decision making process at
Best-in-Class organizations However, because they may not be able to have a
mobility “guru” on staff, CEOs at Best-in-Class SMBs are actively involved
in their organization’s mobility initiatives Specifically, Aberdeen’s research
found that 55% of the CEOs at Best-in-Class SMBs are spearheading the
mobility initiatives at their organizations
"Currently we only really use mobile email but we use it a lot We are now exploring what other applications we should mobilize."
~ CIO, European Software Manufacturer
In the next chapter, we will see what the top performers are doing to
achieve these gains
Trang 9Chapter Two:
Benchmarking Requirements for Success
Fast Facts
√ 63% of Best-in-Class SMBs
currently use or plan to implement remote over-the-air backup systems
√ Best-in-Class SMBs are 50%
more likely than Laggards
to leverage over-the-air updates for devices and applications
√ 69% of Best-in-Class SMBs
currently use or plan to implement remote device maintenance systems
The selection of mobility solutions and their integration with business
intelligence and business process management systems plays a crucial role in
the ability to efficiently apply these strategies, resulting in increased
productivity and profitability
Case Study – MS Walker
Take, for example, MS Walker (MSW), a Massachusetts based, 4th
generation family-owned wine and spirits wholesaler/distributor operating
in 29 states across the country One of the largest distributors in the area,
MSW distributed over three million cases of wines and spirits in 2007
MSW began its mobility initiatives in 2002 when it started providing mobile
solutions including VPN and web access to email to its employees Later
that year, it began deploying smartphones and PDAs in response to its sales
force’s need for more effective and time sensitive sales tools MSW
deployed handheld devices that had a SFA application to access information
regarding product inventory, pricing and client sales history These devices,
combined with a wireless data card, allowed the sales force to perform
real-time order entries, thereby speeding up the entire order generation
and delivery process
As the cost of wireless data services declined, MSW chose to streamline its
mobility strategy by combining the functionality of the PDA and mobile
phones onto one device With that newfound technology, MSW was able
to provide its workforce with push email services, as well as the SFA
application with extended business intelligence functionality
The mobilization of any process is predicated on a case by case business
analysis where MSW’s CIO, Michael Saitow, works with the line of business
managers to determine how the technology can best impact the business
process in question “We look at the individual pain points and put a value
to those specific returns,” says Saitow Although a major challenge for
Saitow is that his industry is not a strong adopter of technology, he remains
confident of the benefits mobility has brought to his organization and is
now examining how to mobilize processes such as invoice processing
“We’re at the tail end of crossing the chasm,” concludes Saitow
Competitive Assessment
The aggregated performance of surveyed companies determined whether
they ranked as Best-in-Class, Industry Average, or Laggard In addition to
having common performance levels, each class also shared characteristics in
five key categories: (1) process (policies for appropriate use of devices and
processes to evaluate new mobility projects); (2) organization (corporate
focus and collaboration among stakeholders); (3) knowledge
management (documenting mobility implementations and staff training on
Trang 10the applications); (4) technology (the selection of appropriate tools and
intelligent deployment of those tools); and (5) performance
management (the ability of the organization to measure the benefits of
technology deployment and use the results to improve key processes
further) These characteristics (identified in Table 4) serve as a guideline for
best practices, and correlate directly with Best-in-Class performance
Table 4: The Competitive Framework
Policies for appropriate use of wireless data services
Procedural controls in regards to enterprise mobility
Process
IT staff to test new mobility initiatives
Cross-functional (non-IT) teams to evaluate new mobility initiatives
Organization
Help desk staff trained on mobility
Staff training programs for mobile applications
Knowledge
Enterprise mobility technology currently in use:
Technology
̇ 53% mobile VPN / VPN for mobile devices
̇ 53% WiFi enabled smartphones
̇ 39% antivirus software for mobile devices
̇ 47% mobile VPN / VPN for mobile devices
̇ 44% WiFi enabled smartphones
̇ 27% antivirus software for mobile devices
̇ 45% mobile VPN / VPN for mobile devices
̇ 38% WiFi enabled smartphones
̇ 18% antivirus software for mobile devices Measurement of the impact of mobility solutions:
Performance
̇ 79% monitored the progress of their mobility initiatives
̇ 85% monitored the performance
of their mobile applications
̇ 68% monitored the progress of their mobility initiatives
̇ 68% monitored the performance
of their mobile applications
̇ 53% monitored the progress of their mobility initiatives
̇ 57% monitored the performance
of their mobile applications
"Remote access capabilities blur the landscape For a small business such as ours, the mix
of smartphones for mail/collaboration, and remote access means we can be productive no matter where
we are in the country."
~ Senior Executive,
US based publishing company
"Mobility has at times caused headaches for us, especially when there was a virus on a device, but we are doing ok with it now."
~ Senior Executive, North American IT company
Source: Aberdeen Group, March 2008