1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

MOB Subject 2 – "Link budget " practical

4 573 10
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Link budget practical
Tác giả Baey, Fladenmuller
Trường học Master of Computer Science
Chuyên ngành Mobile Computing
Thể loại practical
Định dạng
Số trang 4
Dung lượng 213,97 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

MOB Subject 2 – "Link budget " practical

Trang 1

MOB Subject 2 – "Link budget " practical

What is the maximum propagation range you can get between a transmitter and a receiver? Using one spreadsheet, you will try to understand the impacts of different parameters implied in the link budget calculation

Create an excel table like the one below You have to generate automatically the answers in the white boxes from the ones of the white boxes

It is supposed that the operating frequency band is 2.4 GHz and that a margin of 10 dB is sufficient

The ART, a French standard regulation body, indicates that the EIRP should not exceed 100 mW Using the following command, indicate automatically on your spreadsheet if this condition is verified:

IF: Returns one value if a condition you specify evaluates to TRUE and another value if it

evaluates to FALSE

Syntax

IF(logical_test,value_if_true,value_if_false)

Transmitter Receiver Unit

Px: transmitter power

Sx min with 11 Mbps

(10-12W)

Access point

Sx max with 1 Mbps Threshold of reception 1,26 0,40

Tx = Px – L + G Tx: EIRP

Margin Max distance at 11 Mbps

Distance

Max distance at 1 Mbps

Based on this spreadsheet

Case 1: Transmitter and Receiver of Cisco traditional cards:

Trang 2

Output power of the amplifier: 20 dBm

Antenna Gain: 0 dBi

We get:

20

100 10 -Margin -Lr -Gr y sensitivit EIRP 20

10 3 10 4 , 2 4 20log -Margin -Lr -Gr y sensitivit

EIRP

5

9 10

20

10 3 10 4 , 2 4 20log -Margin -Lr -Gr y

sensitivit

EIRP

10 10

100 10

3

10 4 , 2 4 20log

10

5

9 10

5

9 10





so

and

Max distance at 11 Mbps is 0,560km

Max distance at 1 Mbps is 1,68km

Case 2: Transmitter and Receiver of Cisco cards with “Pringles antennas” deported

Output power of the amplifier: 10 dBm

Loss in each connector: 0.2 dB (2 connectors are necessary)

Cable length: 3 m

Cable loss: 0,2 dB/m

Gain: 11 dBi

Max distance at 11 Mbps is 1,778km

Max distance at 1 Mbps is 5,02km

Case 3: The transmitter has the characteristics of Case 1 and the receiver has those of Case 2 Max distance at 11 Mbps is 1,778km

Max distance at 1 Mbps is 5,02km

Case 4: The receiver has the characteristics of Case 1 and the transmitter has those of Case 2

It gets the same thing as in case 1 because the receiver is identical to case 1 and the issuer has the same worst case 1

Max distance at 11 Mbps is 0,560km

Max distance at 1 Mbps is 1,68km

1 What do you observe?

If one considers that Case 3 is the uplink, the Case 4 corresponds to the downlink We therefore asymmetry in scope

2 Can one add a “Pringles antenna” (home made antenna from a crips box) to the transmitter when using case 1 specifications ? Why?

Not, because it exceeds the limit imposed by the ART

3 By supposing that one emits with the maximum value of the EIRP, would it be better to use

an antenna with strong gain or to increase the transmitter power?

Trang 3

The two solutions are the same EIRP but it is preferable to increase the gain of the antenna as this will increase the scope for the reverse link where the antenna acts as a receiver

4 In which case that will not be checked anymore?

The antennas are more directive and therefore must be able to align If it does more, it can be a problem

Other comparisons

Subsequently, one will consider that one operates with the maximum value of the EIRP and the connection between the transmitter and the receiver is in LOS The Friis formula which gives the attenuation signal in free space will thus apply We consider a margin of 10 dB

1 Trace the curve of the propagation range according to the sensitivity of the receiver which can vary between -85 dBm and -94 dBm One will take a null gain in reception

Alibre = 20 log10 (4πd / λ)

= 20 log10 (4π / λ) + 20 log10 (d)

= 20 log10 (4π / 0,125) + 20 log10 (d)

With λ = 0,000125 km and f = 2,4 GHz, the formular becomes:

Sensitivity = Px – L + Ge – Alibre + Gr – Margin

and Px –L + Ge = EIRP = 20 dBm

and Gr = 0 dBi

Thus: 20 log10 (4π / 0,000125) = 100

Substitutes:

Sensitivity = EIRP – [20 log10(4π / 0,125) + 20 log10 (d)] + Gr – Margin

⇒ 20 log10 (d) = EIRP – 100 + Gr – Margin – Sensitivity

⇒ d = 10 ^ (EIRP – 100 –10 – Margin – Sensitivity)/20

where Margin = 0

We get d = 10 ^ (20 - 110 – Sensitivity)/20

⇒ d = 10 ^ (– 90 – Sensitivity) / 20 (km)

2 Distance according to the gain

a) Express the distance according to the gain of antenna and the sensitivity receiver One supposes that the transmitter emits with the maximum value of the EIRP

d = 10 ^ (EIRP – 100 + Gr – Margin – Sensitivity)/20

⇒d = 10 ^ (20 – 100 + Gr – 10 – Sensitivity)/20

⇒d = 10 ^ (– 90 + Gr – Sensitivity)/20 (km)

b) Trace for each flow, the curve of the distance according to the antenna gain that one will vary from 0 to 24 dBi You will take the same gain for the transmitter and the receiver and

"data manufacturer" card for sensitivity associated with each flow

d = 10 ^ (– 90 + Gr – Sensitivity)/20 (km)

Ngày đăng: 17/09/2012, 09:13

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN