Rothbard Introduction to the Fourth Edition Copyright © 1983 by Murray N.. Rothbard Introduction to the Fifth Edition Copyright © 2000 by The Ludwig von Mises Institute Copyright © 2000
Trang 1America’s Great Depression
Fifth Edition
Trang 4Copyright © 1963, 1972 by Murray N Rothbard
Introduction to the Third Edition Copyright © 1975 by Murray N Rothbard Introduction to the Fourth Edition Copyright © 1983 by Murray N Rothbard Introduction to the Fifth Edition Copyright © 2000 by The Ludwig von Mises Institute
Copyright © 2000 by The Ludwig von Mises Institute
All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America.
No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews For information write The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832.
ISBN No.: 0-945466-05-6
Trang 5TO JOEY,
the indispensable framework
Trang 6The Ludwig von Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors, and in particular wishes to thank these Patrons:
Dr Gary G Schlarbaum
–
George N Gallagher (In Memoriam), Mary Jacob, Hugh E Ledbetter
–
Mark M Adamo, Lloyd Alaback, Robert Blumen,
Philip G Brumder, Anthony Deden (Sage Capital Management, Inc.),
Mr and Mrs Willard Fischer, Larry R Gies,
Mr and Mrs W.R Hogan, Jr., Mr and Mrs William W Massey, Jr., Ellice McDonald, Jr., MBE, Rosa Hayward McDonald, MBE, Richard McInnis, Mr and Mrs Roger Milliken (Milliken and Company), James M Rodney, Sheldon Rose, Mr and Mrs Edward Schoppe, Jr.,
Mr and Mrs Robert E Urie, Dr Thomas L Wenck
–
Algernon Land Co., L.L.C., J Terry Anderson (Anderson Chemical Company),
G Douglas Collins, Jr., George Crispin, Lee A Everhart, Douglas E French, John William Galbraith, Walker S Green, Mr and Mrs Max Hocutt, Donald L Ifland, Joe R Lee, Arthur L Loeb, William R Machgan, Dorothea H Marica, Bernard Morton, Daniel W Muirhead, James O’Neill, Charles H Reeves (Reeves Family Foundation), Donald Mosby Rembert, Stephen K Salisbury, Mr and Mrs Allan Sawatzky, Joseph P Schirrick,
Mr and Mrs Thomas W Singleton (Nehemiah Foundation), Robert W Smiley, Jr (The Benefit Capital Companies), Byron L Stoeser, Joseph J Syslo, James E Tempesta, M.D., top dog™, Alex T Van Rensselaer, Lawrence Van Someren, Sr., Mr and Mrs Quinten E Ward, David Westrate, Anne Williamson, Keith S Wood
–
Robert Bero, Robert J Birnbach, Richard Bleiberg, John Hamilton Bolstad,
Mr and Mrs Justin G Bradburn, Jr., David and Elizabeth Butler, John W Carpenter, Dr John P Cochran, John Cooke, Henry V Curll, James V De Santo (DTL Inc.), Chris A Doose, Mr and Mrs Ted C Earle, Jay Elliott, Eric Englund, Dr Larry J Eshelman, Lawrence N Field, Elton B Fox (The Fox Foundation), Capt and Mrs Maino des Granges, Christopher J Hackett, John A Halter, John R Harper, Frank W Heemstra, Douglas M Joy, Michael G Keller, D.O., Robert N Kennedy, Richard J Kossmann, M.D., David Kramer, Steven R Krause, Gary R Letsinger, Diana Lewis, J Edward Martin, Norbert McLuckie, Samuel Mellos, Joseph Edward Paul Melville, Robert Mish,
Dr Dorothy Donnelley Moller, Jerry W Moore,
Keith E Moore, D.M.D., Reed W Mower, Brantley I Newsom, Professor and Mrs Stanley E Porter, James A Reichert, Thomas S Ross,
Conrad Schneiker, Roy Schroeder, William V Stephens,
Charles Toops, II (Mo-Ark Guide Service), Robert H Walker (Walker Die Casting Company),
Mr and Mrs Victor Zadikov, Jeannette Zummo
Trang 7Introduction v
Trang 8vi America’s Great Depression
Acknowledgments
While the problem of 1929 has long been of interest to
myself as well as most Americans, my attention wasfirst specifically drawn to a study of the GreatDepression when Mr Leonard E Read, President of theFoundation for Economic Education, asked me, some years ago, toprepare a brief paper on the subject I am very grateful to Mr Readfor being, in this way, the sparkplug for the present book Havingwritten the article, I allowed the subject to remain dormant forseveral years, amid the press of other work At that point, on thewarm encouragement of Mr Richard C Cornuelle, now of theFoundation for Voluntary Welfare, I proceeded on the task ofexpansion to the present work, an expansion so far-reaching as toleave few traces of the original sketch I owe a particular debt tothe Earhart Foundation, without whose aid this study could neverhave been written
My supreme debt is to Professor Ludwig von Mises, whosemonumental theory of business cycles I have used to explain thecauses of the otherwise mysterious 1929 depression Of allProfessor Mises’s notable contributions to economic science, hisbusiness cycle theory is certainly one of the most significant It is
no exaggeration to say that any study of business cycles not basedupon his theoretical foundation is bound to be a fruitless under-taking
The responsibility for this work, of course, is entirely my own
vi
Trang 9Introduction vii
Trang 10viii America’s Great Depression
Contents
Introduction to the Fifth Edition xi
Introduction to the Fourth Edition xvii
Introduction to the Third Edition xxv
Introduction to the Second Edition xxxi
Introduction to the First Edition xxxv
PART I: BUSINESS CYCLE THEORY 1 THE POSITIVE THEORY OF THE CYCLE 3
Business cycles and business fluctuations 4
The problem: the cluster of error 8
The explanation: boom and depression 9
Secondary features of depression: deflationary credit contraction 14
Government depression policy: laissez-faire 19
Preventing depressions 23
Problems in the Austrian theory of the trade cycle 29
2 KEYNESIAN CRITICISMS OF THE THEORY 37
The liquidity “trap” 39
Wage rates and unemployment 42
3 SOME ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF DEPRESSION: A CRITIQUE 55
General overproduction 56
Underconsumption 57
The acceleration principle 60
viii
Trang 11Introduction ix
Dearth of “investment opportunities” 68
Schumpeter’s business cycle theory 72
Qualitative credit doctrines 75
Overoptimism and overpessimism 80
PART II: THE INFLATIONARY BOOM: 1921–1929 4 THE INFLATIONARY FACTORS 85
The definition of the money supply 87
Inflation of the money supply, 1921–1929 91
Generating the inflation, I: reserve requirements 95
Generating the inflation, II: total reserves 101
Treasury currency 116
Bills discounted 117
Bills bought–acceptances 126
U.S government securities 133
5 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFLATION 137
Foreign lending 137
Helping Britain 142
The crisis approaches 159
6 THEORY AND INFLATION: ECONOMISTS AND THE LURE OF A STABLE PRICE LEVEL 169
PART III: THE GREAT DEPRESSION: 1929–1933 7 PRELUDE TO DEPRESSION: MR HOOVER AND LAISSEZ-FAIRE 185
The development of Hoover’s interventionism: unemployment 188
The development of Hoover’s interventionism: labor relations 199
8 THE DEPRESSION BEGINS: PRESIDENT HOOVER TAKES COMMAND 209
The White House conferences 210
Inflating credit 214
Public works 216
The New Deal Farm Program 217
Trang 129 1930 239
More inflation 239
The Smoot–Hawley Tariff 241
Hoover in the second half of 1930 243
The public works agitation 250
The fiscal burdens of government 253
10 1931—“THE TRAGIC YEAR” 257
The American monetary picture 260
The fiscal burden of government 263
Public works and wage rates 264
Maintaining wage rates 267
Immigration restrictions 270
Voluntary relief 271
Hoover in the last quarter of 1931 272
The spread of collectivist ideas in the business world 277
11 THE HOOVER NEW DEAL OF 1932 285
The tax increase 286
Expenditures versus economy 288
Public works agitation 292
The RFC 296
Governmental relief 300
The inflation program 301
The inflation agitation 308
Mr Hoover’s war on the stock market 316
The home loan bank system 317
The bankruptcy law 318
The fight against immigration 319
12 THE CLOSE OF THE HOOVER TERM 321
The attack on property rights: the final currency failure 323
Wages, hours, and employment during the depression 330
Conclusion: the lessons of Mr Hoover’s record 336
APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT AND THE NATIONAL PRODUCT, 1929–1932 339
INDEX 349
Trang 13TABLE 1: Total Money Supply of the United States,
1921–1929 92
TABLE 2: Total Dollars and Total Gold Reserves 94
TABLE 3: Member Bank Demand Deposits 98
TABLE 4: Demand and Time Deposits 99
TABLE 5: Time Deposits 100
TABLE 6: Member Bank Reserves and Deposits 102
TABLE 7: Changes in Reserves and Causal Factors
1921–1929 109
TABLE 8: Per Month Changes in Reserves and Causal Factors 1921–1929 110
TABLE 9: Factors Determining Bank Reserves July–October 1929 166
TABLE I: National Product 341
TABLE II: Income Originating in Government 342
TABLE III: Private Product 342
TABLE IV: Government Expenditures 343
TABLE V: Expenditures of Government Enterprises 345
TABLE VI: Expenditures of Government and Government Enterprises 345
TABLE VII: Receipts of Government and Government Enterprises 346
TABLE VIII: Government and the Private Product 347
xi America’s Great Depression
Trang 14xii America’s Great Depression
The Wall Street collapse of September–October 1929 and
the Great Depression which followed it were among themost important events of the twentieth century Theymade the Second World War possible, though not inevitable, and
by undermining confidence in the efficacy of the market and thecapitalist system, they helped to explain why the absurdly ineffi-cient and murderous system of Soviet communism survived for solong Indeed, it could be argued that the ultimate emotional andintellectual consequences of the Great Depression were not final-
ly erased from the mind of humanity until the end of the 1980s,when the Soviet collectivist alternative to capitalism crumbled inhopeless ruin and the entire world accepted there was no substitutefor the market
Granted the importance of these events, then, the failure of torians to explain either their magnitude or duration is one of thegreat mysteries of modern historiography The Wall Street plungeitself was not remarkable, at any rate to begin with The UnitedStates economy had expanded rapidly since the last downturn in
his-1920, latterly with the inflationary assistance of the bankers andthe federal government So a correction was due, indeed overdue.The economy, in fact, ceased to expand in June, and it wasinevitable that this change in the real economy would be reflected
in the stock market
The bull market effectively came to an end on September 3,
1929, immediately the shrewder operators returned from vacationand looked hard at the underlying figures Later rises were merely
xii
Trang 15Introduction xiii
hiccups in a steady downward trend On Monday October 21, forthe first time, the ticker tape could not keep pace with the news offalls and never caught up Margin calls had begun to go out bytelegram the Saturday before, and by the beginning of the weekspeculators began to realize they might lose their savings and eventheir homes On Thursday, October 24, shares dropped verticallywith no one buying, and speculators were sold out as they failed torespond to margin calls Then came Black Tuesday, October 29,and the first selling of sound stocks to raise desperately needed liq-uidity
So far all was explicable and might easily have been predicted.This particular stock market corrective was bound to be severebecause of the unprecedented amount of speculation which WallStreet rules then permitted In 1929 1,548,707 customers hadaccounts with America’s 29 stock exchanges In a population of 120million, nearly 30 million families had an active association withthe market, and a million investors could be called speculators.Moreover, of these nearly two-thirds, or 600,000, were trading onmargin; that is, on funds they either did not possess or could noteasily produce
The danger of this growth in margin trading was compounded
by the mushrooming of investment trusts which marked the lastphase of the bull market Traditionally, stocks were valued at aboutten times earnings With high margin trading, earnings on shares,only one or two percent, were far less than the eight to ten percentinterest on loans used to buy them This meant that any profitswere in capital gains alone Thus, Radio Corporation of America,which had never paid a dividend at all, went from 85 to 410 points
in 1928 By 1929, some stocks were selling at 50 times earnings Amarket boom based entirely on capital gains is merely a form ofpyramid selling By the end of 1928 the new investment trusts werecoming onto the market at the rate of one a day, and virtually allwere archetype inverted pyramids They had “high leverage”—anew term in 1929—through their own supposedly shrewd invest-ments, and secured phenomenal stock exchange growth on thebasis of a very small plinth of real growth United FoundersCorporation, for instance, had been created by a bankruptcy with
Trang 16Introduction to the Fifth Edition xiv
an investment of $500, and by 1929 its nominal resources, whichdetermined its share price, were listed as $686,165,000 Anotherinvestment trust had a market value of over a billion dollars, but itschief asset was an electric company which in 1921 had been worthonly $6 million These crazy trusts, whose assets were almostentirely dubious paper, gave the boom an additional superstructure
of pure speculation, and once the market broke, the “high age” worked in reverse
lever-Hence, awakening from the pipe dream was bound to be painful,and it is not surprising that by the end of the day on October 24,eleven men well-known on Wall Street had committed suicide.The immediate panic subsided on November 13, at which pointthe index had fallen from 452 to 224 That was indeed a severe cor-rection but it has to be remembered that in December 1928 theindex had been 245, only 21 points higher Business and stockexchange downturns serve essential economic purposes They have
to be sharp, but they need not be long because they are ing All they require on the part of the government, the businesscommunity, and the public is patience The 1920 recession hadadjusted itself within a year There was no reason why the 1929recession should have taken longer, for the American economy wasfundamentally sound If the recession had been allowed to adjustitself, as it would have done by the end of 1930 on any earlier anal-ogy, confidence would have returned and the world slump neednever have occurred
self-adjust-Instead, the stock market became an engine of doom, carrying
to destruction the entire nation and, in its wake, the world By
July 8, 1932, New York Times industrials had fallen from 224 at the
end of the initial panic to 58 U.S Steel, the world’s biggest andmost efficient steel-maker, which had been 262 points before themarket broke in 1929, was now only 22 General Motors, alreadyone of the best-run and most successful manufacturing groups inthe world, had fallen from 73 to 8 These calamitous falls weregradually reflected in the real economy Industrial production,which had been 114 in August 1929, was 54 by March 1933, a fall
of more than half, while manufactured durables fell by 77 percent,nearly four-fifths Business construction fell from $8.7 billion in
1929 to only $1.4 billion in 1933
Trang 17This pattern was repeated all over the industrial world It wasthe worst slump in history, and the most protracted Indeed therewas no natural recovery France, for instance, did not get back to its
1929 level of industrial production until the mid-1950s The worldeconomy, insofar as it was saved at all, was saved by war, or itspreparations The first major economy to revitalize itself wasGermany’s, which with the advent of Hitler’s Nazi regime inJanuary, 1933, embarked on an immediate rearmament program.Within a year, Germany had full employment None of the othersfared so well Britain began to rearm in 1937, and thereafter unem-ployment fell gradually, though it was still at historically high levelswhen war broke out on September 3, 1939 That was the date onwhich Wall Street, anticipating lucrative arms sales and eventuallyU.S participation in the war, at last returned to 1929 prices
It is a dismal story, and I do not feel that any historian has isfactorily explained it Why so deep? Why so long? We do notreally know, to this day But the writer who, in my judgment, hascome closest to providing a satisfactory analysis is Murray N
sat-Rothbard in America’s Great Depression For half a century, the
con-ventional, orthodox explanation, provided by John MaynardKeynes and his followers, was that capitalism was incapable of sav-ing itself, and that government did too little to rescue an intellec-tually bankrupt market system from the consequences of its ownfolly This analysis seemed less and less convincing as the yearswent by, especially as Keynesianism itself became discredited
In the meantime, Rothbard had produced, in 1963, his ownexplanation, which turned the conventional one on its head Theseverity of the Wall Street crash, he argued, was not due to the unre-strained license of a freebooting capitalist system, but to government
Trang 18Introduction to the Fifth Edition xvi
insistence on keeping a boom going artificially by pumping ininflationary credit The slide in stocks continued, and the realeconomy went into freefall, not because government interfered toolittle, but because it interfered too much Rothbard was the first tomake the point, in this context, that the spirit of the times in the1920s, and still more so in the 1930s, was for government to plan,
to meddle, to order, and to exhort It was a hangover from the FirstWorld War, and President Hoover, who had risen to worldwideprominence in the war by managing relief schemes, and had thenheld high economic office throughout the twenties before movinginto the White House itself in 1929, was a born planner, meddler,orderer, and exhorter
Hoover’s was the only department of the U.S federal ment which had expanded steadily in numbers and power duringthe 1920s, and he had constantly urged Presidents Harding andCoolidge to take a more active role in managing the economy.Coolidge, a genuine minimalist in government, had complained:
govern-“For six years that man has given me unsolicited advice—all of itbad.” When Hoover finally took over the White House, he fol-lowed his own advice, and made it an engine of interference, firstpumping more credit into an already overheated economy and,then, when the bubble burst, doing everything in his power toorganize government rescue operations
We now see, thanks to Rothbard’s insights, that the Hoover–Roosevelt period was really a continuum, that most of the “inno-vations” of the New Deal were in fact expansions or intensifica-tions of Hoover solutions, or pseudo-solutions, and that FranklinDelano Roosevelt’s administration differed from Herbert Hoover’s
in only two important respects—it was infinitely more successful
in managing its public relations, and it spent rather more ers’ money And, in Rothbard’s argument, the net effect of theHoover–Roosevelt continuum of policy was to make the slumpmore severe and to prolong it virtually to the end of the 1930s.The Great Depression was a failure not of capitalism but of thehyperactive state
taxpay-I will not spoil the reader’s pleasure by entering more deeply
into Rothbard’s arguments His book is an intellectual tour de force,
Trang 19Introduction xvii
in that it consists, from start to finish, of a sustained thesis, sented with relentless logic, abundant illustration, and great elo-quence I know of few books which bring the world of economichistory so vividly to life, and which contain so many cogent les-sons, still valid in our own day It is also a rich mine of interestingand arcane knowledge, and I urge readers to explore its footnotes,which contain many delicious quotations from the great and thefoolish of those days, three-quarters of a century ago It is not sur-prising that the book is going into yet another edition It has stoodthe test of time with success, even with panache, and I feel honored
pre-to be invited pre-to introduce it pre-to a new generation of readers
PAUL JOHNSON
1999
Trang 20Introduction to the Fourth Edition
There seems to be a cycle in new editions of this book The
second edition was published in the midst of the 1969–71inflationary recession, the third in the mighty inflationarydepression of 1973–75 The economy is now in the midst ofanother inflationary depression at least as severe, and perhaps evenmore so, than the 1973–75 contraction, which had been the worstsince the 1930s
The confusion and intellectual despair we noted in the duction to the third edition has now intensified It is generally con-ceded that Keynesianism is intellectually bankrupt, and we aretreated to the spectacle of veteran Keynesians calling for taxincreases during a severe depression, a change of front that fewpeople consider worth noting, much less trying to explain Part of the general bewilderment is due to the fact that the cur-rent, severe 1981–83 depression followed very swiftly after therecession of 1979–80, so that it begins to look that the fitful andshort-lived recovery of 1980–81 may have been but an interlude inthe midst of a chronic recession that has lasted since 1979 Pro-duction has been stagnating for years, the auto industry is in badshape, thrift institutions are going bankrupt by the week, andunemployment has reached its highest point since the 1930s
intro-A notable feature of the 1981–83 depression is that, in contrast
to 1973–75, the drift of economic thought and policy has not beentoward collectivist planning but toward alleged free-market poli-cies The Reagan administration began with a fanfare of allegedlydrastic budget and tax cuts, all of which lightly masked massive
xviii