1. Trang chủ
  2. » Công Nghệ Thông Tin

Network Congestion Control Managing Internet Traffic phần 10 ppsx

23 233 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 23
Dung lượng 191,94 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 241NACK Negative AcknowledgementNAT Network Address Translator NSBM Network Simulation By Mouse NSIS Next Steps in Signaling OSU Ohio State University ATM ABR schem

Trang 1

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 241NACK Negative Acknowledgement

NAT Network Address Translator

NSBM Network Simulation By Mouse

NSIS Next Steps in Signaling

OSU Ohio State University (ATM ABR scheme)

PAWS Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers

PEP Performance Enhancing Proxy

PGM Pragmatic General Multicast

PH-RTO Peak Hopper RTO

PLM Packet Pair Receiver-driven Cumulative Layered Multicast

PMTUD Path MTU Discovery

PPD Partial Packet Discard

PTP Performance Transparency Protocol

QoS Quality of Service

RAP Rate Adaptation Protocol

RED Random Early Detection

RED-PD RED with Preferential Dropping

RLC Receiver-driven Layered Congestion Control

RLM Receiver-driven Layered Multicast

RM Resource Management (cells)

RMT Reliable Multicast Transport

ROHC Robust Header Compression

RR-TCP Reordering-Robust TCP

RSVP Resource Reservation Protocol

RTCP RTP Control Protocol

RTP Real-time Transport Protocol

SACK Selective Acknowledgements

SCTP Stream Control Transmission Protocol

SFB Stochastic Fair Blue

SFQ Stochastic Fair Queuing

SIGTRAN Signalling Transport

SRTT Smoothed Round Trip Time

ssthresh Slow start threshold

Trang 2

TCP Transmission Control Protocol

TCPM TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions

TEAR TCP Emulation at Receivers

TFMCC TCP-friendly Multicast Congestion Control

TFRC TCP-friendly Rate Control

TSVWG Transport Area Working Group

UDP User Datagram Protocol

WEBRC Wave and Equation Based Rate Control

XCP eXpress Control Protocol

Trang 3

Akella A, Seshan S, Karp R, Shenker S and Papadimitriou C (2002) Selfish behavior and stability

of the internet: a game-theoretic analysis of tcp SIGCOMM ’02: Proceedings of the 2002

Confer-ence on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications,

pp 117–130 ACM Press

Akyildiz IF, Morabito G and Palazzo S (2001) Tcp-peach: a new congestion control scheme for

satellite ip networks IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 9(3), 307–321.

Akyildiz IF, Zhang X and Fang J (2002) Tcp-peach+: enhancement of tcp-peach for satellite ip

networks IEEE Communications Letters 6(7), 303–305.

Allman M (2003) TCP Congestion Control with Appropriate Byte Counting (ABC) RFC 3465 imental)

(Exper-Allman M, Balakrishnan H and Floyd S (2001) Enhancing TCP’s Loss Recovery Using LimitedTransmit RFC 3042 (Proposed Standard)

Allman M, Dawkins S, Glover D, Griner J, Tran D, Henderson T, Heidemann J, Touch J, Kruse H,Ostermann S, Scott K and Semke J (2000) Ongoing TCP Research Related to Satellites RFC 2760(Informational)

Allman M, Floyd S and Partridge C (2002) Increasing TCP’s Initial Window RFC 3390 (ProposedStandard)

Allman M, Glover D and Sanchez L (1999a) Enhancing TCP Over Satellite Channels using StandardMechanisms RFC 2488 (Best Current Practice)

Allman M and Paxson V (1999) On estimating end-to-end network path properties SIGCOMM

’99: Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp 263–274 ACM Press.

Allman M, Paxson V and Stevens W (1999b) TCP Congestion Control RFC 2581 (Proposed dard) Updated by RFC 3390

Stan-Andersson L, Doolan P, Feldman N, Fredette A and Thomas B (2001) LDP Specification RFC 3036(Proposed Standard)

Appenzeller G, Keslassy I and McKeown N (2004) Sizing router buffers ACM SIGCOMM, pp 281–

292 ACM Press

Armitage G (2000) Quality of Service in IP Networks: Foundations for a Multi-service Internet

Tech-nology Series MTR, Indianapolis, IN

Ash J, Girish M, Gray E, Jamoussi B and Wright G (2002) Applicability Statement for CR-LDP RFC

3213 (Informational)

Athuraliya S, Low S, Li V and Yin Q (2001) Rem: active queue management IEEE Network 15(3),

48–53

Network Congestion Control: Managing Internet Traffic Michael Welzl

 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Trang 4

Aweya J, Ouellette M and Montuno DY (2001) A control theoretic approach to active queue

man-agement Computer Networks 36(2-3), 203–235.

Baker F (1995) Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers RFC 1812 (Proposed Standard) Updated byRFC 2644

Bakre A and Badrinath BR (1995) I-tcp: indirect tcp for mobile hosts 15th International Conference

on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Balakrishnan H, Padmanabhan V, Fairhurst G and Sooriyabandara M (2002) TCP Performance cations of Network Path Asymmetry RFC 3449 (Best Current Practice)

Impli-Balakrishnan H, Rahul HS and Seshan S (1999) An integrated congestion management architecture

for internet hosts SIGCOMM ’99: Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies,

Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp 175–187 ACM Press.

Balakrishnan H and Seshan S (2001) The Congestion Manager RFC 3124 (Proposed Standard).Balakrishnan H, Seshan S, Amir E and Katz R (1995) Improving tcp/ip performance over wireless

networks 1st ACM Conference on Mobile Communications and Networking (Mobicom), Berkeley,

CA

Balan RK, Lee BP, Kumar KRR, Jacob J, Seah WKG and Ananda AL (2001) TCP HACK: TCP header

checksum option to improve performance over lossy links 20th IEEE Conference on Computer

Communications (INFOCOM), Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Balinski M (2004) Fairness die mathematik der gerechtigkeit Spektrum Der Wissenschaft.

Bansal D and Balakrishnan H (2001) Binomial Congestion Control Algorithms IEEE INFOCOM

2001, Anchorage, AK.

Barz C, Frank M, Martini P and Pilz M (2005) Receiver-based path capacity estimation for tcp

Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen (KiVS) – GI-Edition, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Bhandarkar S, Jain S and Reddy ALN (2005) Improving tcp performance in high bandwidth high rtt

links using layered congestion control PFLDNet 2005 Workshop, Lyon, France.

Blake S, Black D, Carlson M, Davies E, Wang Z and Weiss W (1998) An Architecture for tiated Service RFC 2475 (Informational) Updated by RFC 3260

Differen-Blanton E and Allman M (2002) On making tcp more robust to packet reordering SIGCOMM

Computer Communication Review 32(1), 20–30.

Blanton E and Allman M (2004) Using TCP Duplicate Selective Acknowledgement (DSACKs) andStream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Duplicate Transmission Sequence Numbers (TSNs)

to Detect Spurious Retransmissions RFC 3708 (Experimental)

Blanton E, Allman M, Fall K and Wang L (2003) A Conservative Selective Acknowledgment based Loss Recovery Algorithm for TCP RFC 3517 (Proposed Standard)

(SACK)-Bless R, Nichols K and Wehrle K (2003) A Lower Effort Per-domain Behavior (PDB) for tiated Services RFC 3662 (Informational)

Differen-Bolot J (1993) End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet SIGCOMM ’93: Conference

Proceedings on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, pp 289–298 ACM

Press

Trang 5

BIBLIOGRAPHY 245Border J, Kojo M, Griner J, Montenegro G and Shelby Z (2001) Performance Enhancing ProxiesIntended to Mitigate Link-related Degradations RFC 3135 (Informational).

Bosau D (2005) Path tail emulation: an approach to enable end-to-end congestion control for split

connections and performance enhancing proxies In Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen KiVS

2005 (eds M¨uller P, Gotzhein R and Schmitt JB), pp 33–40 Gesellschaft f¨ur Informatik (GI),

Braden R, Clark D and Shenker S (1994) Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: An OverviewRFC 1633 (Informational)

Braden R, Zhang L, Berson S, Herzog S and Jamin S (1997) Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)– Version 1 Functional Specification RFC 2205 (Proposed Standard).Updated by RFCs 2750, 3936.Brakmo L, O’Malley S and Peterson L (1994) Tcp vegas: new techniques for congestion detection

and avoidance ACM SIGCOMM, pp 24–35, London, UK.

Byers J, Frumin M, Horn G, Luby M, Mitzenmacher M, Roetter A and Shaver W (2000) Flid-dl:

congestion control for layered multicast NGC’00, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Campbell AT and Liao R (2001) A utility-based approach for quantitative adaptation in wireless

packet networks Wireless Networks 7, 541–557.

Carlberg K, Gevros P and Crowcroft J (2001) Lower than best effort: a design and implementation

SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 31(suppl 2), 244–265.

Carpenter B (1996) Architectural Principles of the Internet RFC 1958 (Informational) Updated byRFC 3439

Carter RL and Crovella ME (1996) Measuring bottleneck link speed in packet switched networks

Performance Evaluation 27 and 28, 297–318 Amsterdam, NY.

Cerf V, Dalal Y and Sunshine C (1974) Specification of Internet Transmission Control Program RFC675

Chait Y, Hollot CV, Misra V, Towsley D, Zhang H and Lui J (2002) Providing throughput

differ-entiation for tcp flows using adaptive twocolor marking and two-level aqm IEEE Infocom, New

York

Chen L, Nandan A, Yang G, Sanadidi MY and Gerla M (2004) Capprobe Based Passive CapacityEstimation Technical Report TR040023, UCLA CSD

Chen X, Mohapatra P and Chen H (2001) An admission control scheme for predictable server response

time for web accesses WWW ’01: Proceedings of The 10th International Conference On World Wide

Web, pp 545–554 ACM Press, New York.

Chiu DM and Jain R (1989) Analysis of the increase/decrease algorithms for congestion avoidance

in computer networks Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 17(1), 1–14.

Choe DH and Low SH (2004) Stabilized Vegas In Advances in Communication Control Networks,

Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, (eds Tarbouriech S, Abdallah C and Chiasson J)

vol 308 Springer Press

Christin N, Grossklags J and Chuang J (2004) Near rationality and competitive equilibria in networked

systems PINS ’04: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Practice and Theory of

Incentives in Networked Systems, pp 213–219 ACM Press.

Clark D (1982) Window and Acknowledgement Strategy in TCP RFC 813

Trang 6

246 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Clark DD and Tennenhouse DL (1990) Architectural considerations for a new generation of protocols

SIGCOMM ’90: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Communications Architectures & Protocols,

pp 200–208 ACM Press

Courcoubetis C and Weber R (2003) Pricing Communication Networks John Wiley & Sons.

Crovella ME and Bestavros A (1997) Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: evidence and possible

causes IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 5(6), 835–846.

Crowcroft J, Hand S, Mortier R, Roscoe T and Warfield A (2003) Qos’s downfall: at the bottom,

or not at all! Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Revisiting IP QoS, pp 109–114.

ACM Press

Crowcroft J and Oechslin P (1998) Differentiated end-to-end internet services using a weighted

proportional fair sharing tcp SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 28(3), 53–69.

Dawkins S, Montenegro G, Kojo M and Magret V (2001a) End-to-end Performance Implications ofSlow Links RFC 3150 (Best Current Practice)

Dawkins S, Montenegro G, Kojo M, Magret V and Vaidya N (2001b) End-to-end PerformanceImplications of Links with Errors RFC 3155 (Best Current Practice)

Deepak B, Hari Balakrishnan SF and Shenker S (2001) Dynamic behavior of slowly-responsive

con-gestion control algorithms ACM SIGCOMM 2001, San Diego, CA.

Diederich J, Lohmar T, Zitterbart M and Keller R (2000) Traffic phase effects with RED and constant

bit rate UDP-based traffic QofIS, pp 233-244 Berlin, Germany.

Dovrolis C, Ramanathan P and Moore D (2001) What do packet dispersion techniques measure?

IEEE INFOCOM, pp 905–914, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Downey AB (1999) Using pathchar to estimate internet link characteristics SIGCOMM ’99:

Proceed-ings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp 241–250 ACM Press.

Drewes M and Haid O (2000) Tiroler K¨uche Tyrolia Verlaganstalt.

Duke M, Braden R, Eddy W and Blanton E (2004) A roadmap for Tcp Specification Documents,Internet-draft Draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-roadmap-00, Work in Progress

Durresi A, Sridharan M, Liu C, Goyal M and Jain R (2001) Traffic management using multilevel

explicit congestion notification SCI 2001, Orlando Florida Special session ‘ABR to the Internet’ Eggert L, Heidemann J and Touch J (2000) Effects of ensemble-tcp SIGCOMM Computer Commu-

nication Review 30(1), 15–29.

Ekstr¨om H and Ludwig R (2004) The peak-hopper: a new end-to-end retransmission timer for reliable

unicast transport IEEE Infocom, Hong Kong, China.

Ely D, Spring N, Wetherall D, Savage S and Anderson T (2001) Robust congestion signaling

Pro-ceedings of International Conference on Network Protocols, Riverside, CA.

Fairhurst G and Wood L (2002) Advice to Link Designers on Link Automatic Repeat ReQuest (ARQ)RFC 3366 (Best Current Practice)

Fall K and Floyd S (1996) Simulation-based comparisons of tahoe, reno, and SACK TCP Computer

Communication Review 26(3), 5–21.

Feamster N, Bansal D and Balakrishnan H (2001) On the interactions between layered quality

adaptation and congestion control for streaming video 11th International Packet Video Workshop,

Kyongju, Korea

Feng W, Chang F, Feng W and Walpole J (2002a) Provisioning on-line games: a traffic analysis

of a busy counter-strike server IMW ’02: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on

Internet Measurement, pp 151–156 ACM Press.

Feng W, Gardner MK, Fisk ME and Weigle EH (2003) Automatic flow-control adaptation for

enhanc-ing network performance in computational grids Journal of Grid Computenhanc-ing 1(1), 63–74.

Trang 7

BIBLIOGRAPHY 247

Feng W, Kandlur D, Saha D and Shin K (1999) A self-configuring red gateway Conference on

Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), New York.

Feng W, Shin KG, Kandlur DD and Saha D (2002b) The blue active queue management algorithms

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 10(4), 513–528.

Fielding R, Gettys J, Mogul J, Frystyk H, Masinter L, Leach P and Berners-Lee T (1999) HypertextTransfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1 RFC 2616 (Draft Standard) Updated by RFC 2817

Floyd S (1994) TCP and Successive Fast Retransmits ICIR, Available fromhttp://www.icir.org/floyd/notes.html

Floyd S (2000) Congestion Control Principles RFC 2914 (Best Current Practice)

Floyd S (2002) General Architectural and Policy Considerations RFC 3426 (Informational).Floyd S (2003) HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion Windows RFC 3649 (Experimental).Floyd S (2004) Limited Slow-start for TCP with Large Congestion Windows RFC 3742(Experimental)

Floyd S and Fall K (1999) Promoting the use of end-to-end congestion control in the internet

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 7(4), 458–472.

Floyd S, Gummadi R and Shenker S (2001) Adaptive RED: an algorithm for increasing the robustness

of RED’s active queue management Available from http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers.html.Floyd S, Handley M and Kohler E (2002) Problem Statement for dccp, Internet-draft Draft-ietf-dccp-problem-00, Work in Progress

Floyd S, Handley M, Padhye J and Widmer J (2000a) Equation-based congestion control for unicast

applications ACM SIGCOMM, pp 43–56 ACM Press.

Floyd S and Henderson T (1999) The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast Recovery AlgorithmRFC 2582 (Experimental) Obsoleted by RFC 3782

Floyd S, Henderson T and Gurtov A (2004) The NewReno Modification to TCP’s Fast RecoveryAlgorithm RFC 3782 (Proposed Standard)

Floyd S and Jacobson V (1991) Traffic phase effects in packet-switched gateways SIGCOMM

Com-puter Communication Review 21(2), 26–42.

Floyd S and Jacobson V (1993) Random early detection gateways for congestion avoidance

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 1(4), 397–413.

Floyd S, Jacobson V, Liu CG, McCanne S and Zhang L (1997) A reliable multicast framework for

light-weight sessions and application level framing IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 5(6),

Acknowl-Fomenkov M, Keys K, Moore D and Claffy K (2004) Longitudinal study of internet traffic in

1998-2003 WISICT ’04: Proceedings of the Winter International Symposium on Information and

Communication Technologies, pp 1–6 Trinity College Dublin.

Gemmell J, Montgomery T, Tony Speakman T, Bhaskar N and Crowcroft J (2003) The pgm reliable

multicast protocol IEEE Network 17(1), 16–22.

Gerla M and Kleinrock L (1980) Flow control: a comparative survey IEEE Transactions on

Com-munications 28(4), 553–574.

Gevros P, Risso F and Kirstein P (1999) Analysis of a method for differential tcp service IEEE

GLOBECOM Symposium on Global Internet, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.

Trang 8

248 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Gharai L (2004) Rtp Profile for Tcp Friendly Rate Control Internet-draft draft-ietf-avt-tfrc-profile-03,Work in progress

Gibbens R and Kelly F (1999) Distributed connection acceptance control for a connectionless network

In Teletraffic Engineering in a Competitive World, (eds Key P and Smith D), ITC16, pp 941–952.

Elsevier, Amsterdam, NY

Grieco LA and Mascolo S (2002) Tcp westwood and easy red to improve fairness in high-speed

networks PIHSN ’02: Proceedings of the 7th IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Protocols for

High Speed Networks, pp 130–146 Springer-Verlag.

Grieco LA and Mascolo S (2004) Performance evaluation and comparison of westwood+, new reno,

and vegas tcp congestion control SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 34(2), 25–38.

Grossglauser M and Tse DNC (1999) A framework for robust measurement-based admission control

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 7(3), 293–309.

Grossman D (2002) New Terminology and Clarifications for Diffserv RFC 3260 (Informational).Group AVTW, Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R and Jacobson V (1996) RTP: A TransportProtocol for Real-time Applications RFC 1889 (Proposed Standard) Obsoleted by RFC 3550

Gruber G (1994) Langfristige Abh¨angigkeiten, Pseudozyklen und Selbst¨ahnlichkeit in ¨okonomischen

Zeitreihen Schriftenreihe ‘Forschungsergebnisse der Wirtschaftsuniversit¨at Wien, Vienna, Austria.

Gu Y and Grossman RL (2005) Optimizing udp-based protocol implementations PFLDNet 2005

Workshop, Lyon, France.

Guo L, Crovella M and Matta I (2001) How does tcp generate pseudo-self-similarity?

Proceed-ings of the Ninth International Symposium in Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS’01), p 215 IEEE Computer Society.

Guo L and Matta I (2001) The war between mice and elephants The 9th IEEE International

Confer-ence on Network Protocols (ICNP), Riverside, CA.

Gurtov A and Floyd S (2004) Modeling wireless links for transport protocols SIGCOMM Computer

(Experi-Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons Science 162, 1243–1248.

Harrison D, Kalyanaraman S and Ramakrishnan S (2002) Congestion control as a building block for

qos SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 32(1), 71.

Hasegawa G, Kurata K and Murata M (2000) Analysis and improvement of fairness between tcp reno

and vegas for deployment of tcp vegas to the internet IEEE International Conference on Network

Protocols (ICNP), pp 177–186, Osaka, Japan.

Hassan M and Jain R (2004) High Performance TCP/IP Networking Pearson Education International.

He G, Gao Y, Hou J and Park K (2002) A case for exploiting self-similarity in internet traffic in tcp

congestion control IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, pp 34–43, Paris, France.

Heinanen J and Guerin R (1999a) A Single Rate Three Color Marker RFC 2697 (Informational).Heinanen J and Guerin R (1999b) A Two Rate Three Color Marker RFC 2698 (Informational).Henderson T, Crowcroft J and Bhatti S (2001) Congestion pricing Paying your way in communication

networks IEEE Internet Computing 5(5), 85–89.

Trang 9

BIBLIOGRAPHY 249Heying Z, Baohong L and Wenhua D (2003) Design of a robust active queue management algo-

rithm based on feedback compensation SIGCOMM ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on

Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp 277–

285 ACM Press

Hoe J (1995) Start-up dynamics of TCP’s congestion control and avoidance schemes Master’s

the-sis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience

Hoe JC (1996) Improving the start-up behavior of a congestion control scheme for tcp SIGCOMM ’96:

Conference Proceedings on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp 270–280 ACM Press.

Hollot C, Misra V, Towsley D and Gong W (2001) On designing improved controllers for aqm routers

supporting tcp flows INFOCOM 2001 Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer

and Communications Societies, vol 3, pp 1726–1734, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Huitema C (2000) Routing in the Internet second edn P T R Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

07632

Hurley P, Le Boudec J, Thiran P and Kara M (2001) Abe: providing a low-delay service within best

effort IEEE Network 15(3), 60–69.

Huston G (2000) Next Steps for the IP QoS Architecture RFC 2990 (Informational)

Inamura H, Montenegro G, Ludwig R, Gurtov A and Khafizov F (2003) TCP over Second (2.5G)and Third (3G) Generation Wireless Networks RFC 3481 (Best Current Practice)

ISO (1994) Is 7498 OSI(Open System Interconnection Model) Standard

Jacobs S and Eleftheriadis A (1997) Real-time dynamic rate shaping and control for internet video

applications Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp 23–25, Siena, Italy.

Jacobson V (1988) Congestion avoidance and control Symposium Proceedings on Communications

Architectures and Protocols, pp 314–329 ACM Press.

Jacobson V (1990) Compressing TCP/IP headers for low-speed serial links RFC 1144 (ProposedStandard)

Jacobson V (1998) Notes on Using Red for Queue Management and Congestion Avoidance, graphs from Talk at Nanog 13, Available From ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/talks/vj-nanog-red.pdf.Jacobson V and Braden R (1988) TCP extensions for long-delay paths RFC 1072 Obsoleted byRFCs 1323, 2018

View-Jacobson V, Braden R and Borman D (1992) TCP Extensions for High Performance RFC 1323(Proposed Standard)

Jain A and Floyd S (2005) Quick-start for Tcp and Ip internet-draft draft-amit-quick-start-04, Work

in progress

Jain R (1986) A timeout based congestion control scheme for window flow- controlled networks

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications SAC-4(7), 1162–1167 Reprinted in Partridge

C (Ed.) Innovations in Internetworking, 289–295, Artech House, Norwood, MA 1988.

Jain R (1989) A delay based approach for congestion avoidance in interconnected heterogeneous

computer networks Computer Communications Review, ACM SIGCOMM pp 56–71.

Jain R (1990) Congestion control in computer networks: trends and issues IEEE Network, 4(3),

24–30

Jain R, Chiu D and Hawe W (1984) A Quantitative Measure of Fairness and Discrimination forResource Allocation in Shared Computer Systems DEC Research Report TR-301, Digital Equip-ment Corporation, Maynard, MA

Jain R and Ramakrishnan K (1988) Congestion avoidance in computer networks with A connectionless

network layer: concepts, goals, and methodology In Computer Networking Symposium:

Proceed-ings, April 11–13, 1988 (ed IEEE), pp 134–143 IEEE Computer Society Press, Sheraton National

Trang 10

250 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hotel, Washington, DC area, Silver Spring, MD 20910 IEEE catalog number 88CH2547-8 puter Society order number 835

Com-Jamin S, Shenker S and Danzig P (1997) Comparison of measurement-based admission control

algorithms for controlled-load service IEEE Infocom 1997, vol 3, pp 973–980, Kobe.

Jamoussi B, Andersson L, Callon R, Dantu R, Wu L, Doolan P, Worster T, Feldman N, Fredette

A, Girish M, Gray E, Heinanen J, Kilty T and Malis A (2002) Constraint-based LSP Setup usingLDP RFC 3212 (Proposed Standard) Updated by RFC 3468

Jiang H and Dovrolis C (2004) The effect of flow capacities on the burstiness of aggregated traffic

Passive and Active Measurements (PAM) conference, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France.

Jin C, Wei DX and Low SH (2004) Fast tcp: motivation, architecture, algorithms, performance IEEE

Infocom, Hong Kong.

Johari R and Tan DKH (2001) End-to-end congestion control for the internet: delays and stability

IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 9(6), 818–832.

Kalyanaraman S, Jain R, Fahmy S, Goyal R and Kim SC (1996) Performance and buffering

require-ments of internet protocols over ATM ABR and UBR services IEEE Communications Magazine

36(6), 152–157.

Kapoor R, Chen L, Lao L, Gerla M and Sanadidi MY (2004) Capprobe: a simple and accurate

capac-ity estimation technique SIGCOMM ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Applications,

Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp 67–78 ACM Press.

Karn P, Bormann C, Fairhurst G, Grossman D, Ludwig R, Mahdavi J, Montenegro G, Touch J andWood L (2004) Advice for Internet Subnetwork Designers RFC 3819 (Best Current Practice)

Karn P and Partridge C (1987) Round trip time estimation ACM SIGCOMM-87, Stowe, Vermont,

USA

Karn P and Partridge C (1995) Improving round-trip time estimates in reliable transport protocols

SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 25(1), 66–74.

Karsten M (2000) QoS Signalling and Charging in a Multi-service Internet using RSVP PhD thesis,

Darmstadt University of Technology

Katabi D (2003) Decoupling Congestion Control from the Bandwidth Allocation Policy and its

Appli-cation to High Bandwidth-delay Product Networks PhD thesis, MIT.

Katabi D and Blake C (2002) A Note on the Stability Requirements of Adaptive Virtual Queue.Technical Report MIT-LCS-TM-626, MIT

Katabi D, Handley M and Rohrs C (2002) Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product

networks SIGCOMM ’02: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Applications, Technologies,

Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications, pp 89–102 ACM Press.

Katz D (1997) IP Router Alert Option RFC 2113 (Proposed Standard)

Kelly F (1997) Charging and rate control for elastic traffic European Transactions on

Telecommuni-cations 8, 33–37.

Kelly FP, Maulloo A and Tan D (1998) Rate control in communication networks: shadow prices,

proportional fairness and stability Journal of the Operational Research Society 49, 237–252.

Kelly T (2001) An ecn probe-based connection acceptance control SIGCOMM Computer

Communi-cation Review 31(3), 14–25.

Kelly T (2003) Scalable tcp: improving performance in highspeed wide area networks SIGCOMM

Computer Communication Review 33(2), 83–91.

Kent S and Atkinson R (1998) Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol RFC 2401 (ProposedStandard) Updated by RFC 3168

Keshav S (1991a) Congestion Control in Computer Networks PhD thesis UC Berkeley published as

UC Berkeley TR-654

Trang 11

Krishnan R, Sterbenz J, Eddy W, Partridge C and Allman M (2004) Explicit transport error notification

(eten) for error-prone wireless and satellite networks Computer Networks 46(3), 343–362.

Kumar A, Hedge M, Anand SVR, Bindu BN, Thirumurthy D and Kherani AA (2000) Nonintrusive

tcp connection admission control for bandwidth management of an internet access link IEEE

Communications Magazine 38(5), 160–167.

Kunniyur S and Srikant R (2001) Analysis and design of an adaptive virtual queue (avq) algorithm

for active queue management SIGCOMM ’01: Proceedings of the (2001) Conference on

Appli-cations, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer CommuniAppli-cations, pp 123–134.

ACM Press

Kurose JF and Ross KW (2004) Computer Networking: A Top-down Approach Featuring the Internet.

Pearson Benjamin Cummings

Laatu V, Harju J and Loula P (2003) Evaluating performance among different tcp flows in a

differ-entiated services enabled network ICT 2003, Tahiti, Papeete – French Polynesia.

Ladha S, Baucke S, Ludwig R and Amer PD (2004) On making sctp robust to spurious retransmissions

SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 34(2), 123–135.

Lahey K (2000) TCP Problems with Path MTU Discovery RFC 2923 (Informational)

Lai K and Baker M (2000) Measuring link bandwidths using a deterministic model of packet delay

ACM SIGCOMM, pp 43–56 ACM Press.

Larzon LA, Degermark M, Pink S, Jonsson LE and Fairhurst G (2004) The Lightweight User gram Protocol (UDP-Lite) RFC 3828 (Proposed Standard)

Data-Le Boudec J (2001) Rate Adaptation, Congestion Control and Fairness: A Tutorial

Lee S, Seok S, Lee S and Kang C (2001) Study of tcp and udp flows in a differentiated services

network using two markers system MMNS ’01: Proceedings of the 4th IFIP/IEEE International

Conference on Management of Multimedia Networks and Services, pp 198–203 Springer-Verlag.

Legout A and Biersack EW (2000) Plm: fast convergence for cumulative layered multicast

trans-mission schemes SIGMETRICS ’00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMETRICS International

Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pp 13–22 ACM Press.

Legout A and Biersack E (2002) Revisiting the fair queuing paradigm for end-to-end congestion

control IEEE Network 16(5), 38–46.

Leland WE, Taqqu MS, Willinger W and Wilson DV (1993) On the self-similar nature of ethernet

traffic SIGCOMM ’93: Conference Proceedings on Communications Architectures, Protocols and

Applications, pp 183–193 ACM Press.

Li B and Liu J (2003) Multirate video multicast over the internet: an overview IEEE Network 17(1),

24–29

Li M, Claypool M and Kinicki B (2002) Media player versus real player – a comparison of network

turbulence ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop, Marseille, France.

Lin D and Morris R (1997) Dynamics of random early detection SIGCOMM ’97: Proceedings of the

ACM SIGCOMM ’97 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp 127–137 ACM Press.

Low SH, Paganini F, Wang J, Adlakha S and Doyle JC (2002) Dynamics of tcp/red and a scalable

control IEEE Infocom, New York City, New York, USA.

Luby M and Goyal V (2004) Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building Block RFC

3738 (Experimental)

Ngày đăng: 14/08/2014, 12:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN