1. Trang chủ
  2. » Y Tế - Sức Khỏe

Non-pulmonary Critical Care - part 8 potx

13 208 0

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Định dạng
Số trang 13
Dung lượng 173,55 KB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

Although initial trials indicated a mortality benefit of AT in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock,74,75a recent large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 2314 patients with

Trang 1

ensues, resulting in microvascular thrombosis, impaired

blood supply to various organs, and ultimately multiorgan

failure Consumption of platelets and clotting factors

including fibrinogen may result in diffuse hemorrhage.51

DIC is an acquired syndrome that arises in the

setting of another underlying disorder Disease states

known to cause DIC include sepsis, severe trauma,

malignancy (both solid tumor and hematological

malig-nancies, particularly acute promyelocytic leukemia),

ob-stetrical complications, vascular abnormalities such as

giant hemangiomas, and severe liver failure.51,60–62

Di-agnosis of DIC requires assessment of the underlying

clinical scenario in conjunction with appropriate

labo-ratory tests DIC should be considered in patients with

an appropriate clinical syndrome such as sepsis,

malig-nancy, or trauma Laboratory evaluation in DIC typically

reveals a consumptive coagulopathy, as demonstrated by

thrombocytopenia and prolongation of global clotting

times, including the PT-INR, aPTT, and thrombin time

(Table 2) Recent studies have shown that development

of an abnormal, biphasic waveform in the automated

aPTT coagulation assay may be an early predictor of

DIC and may correlate with higher mortality.63,64

In-creased fibrinolysis is suggested by elevated levels of

FDPs and D-dimer.51,65Increased thrombin generation

may produce diminished levels of fibrinogen, although

fibrinogen values may be normal or even elevated as an

acute-phase reactant in some cases of DIC.66 Low

plasma levels of inhibitors of coagulation such as

antith-rombin and protein C contribute to the diagnosis.53–56

Plasma levels of soluble fibrin are highly sensitive in

diagnosing DIC However, they lack specificity, and a

reliable assay is not widely available.67

The subcommittee on DIC of the International

Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis has recently

published a scoring system for DIC that incorporates

simple and readily available laboratory tests (Table 3).68

In patients with a condition known to be associated with

DIC, a score of 5 or more is compatible with DIC This

scoring system was prospectively validated in a study of

217 critically ill medical and surgical patients admitted to

the ICU with a clinical suspicion of DIC.69 The DIC

score was calculated every 48 hours The score was found

to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of DIC, with a

sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 97% Increasing

DIC score also correlated strongly with 28-day mortality

The fundamental approach to treatment of DIC

is prompt identification and aggressive management of

the underlying disorder Transfusion of blood products

may be required, although there are no consensus

guide-lines regarding their appropriate use Transfusion should

not be administered purely in response to abnormal

laboratory results A combination of platelets, FFP,

and/or cryoprecipitate is indicated in the actively

bleed-ing patient, or if the patient requires an invasive

proce-dure or is at high risk for bleeding problems.41,51,52

Although there are some experimental data suggesting

an advantage to using heparin in patients with DIC,70,71 randomized controlled trials have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect.72 Therapeutic doses of heparin are typically limited to patients with clinically overt throm-botic complications associated with DIC, such as acral ischemia and purpura fulminans.51

Recently, several novel therapeutic agents that target specific elements of the coagulation system have been examined Antithrombin (AT) is an essential inhibitor of coagulation that acts via neutralization

of several enzymes in the clotting cascade, including thrombin and factor Xa Based on the findings that AT levels are diminished in DIC53,56 and that lower

AT levels are associated with poorer outcomes,53,56,73

AT concentrate has been administered to septic pa-tients in a randomized, placebo-controlled fashion Although initial trials indicated a mortality benefit of

AT in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock,74,75a recent large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of

2314 patients with severe sepsis failed to demonstrate a survival advantage.76 Additionally, those patients who received AT in conjunction with heparin had an in-creased risk of hemorrhage

Another important anticoagulant mediator is tis-sue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), an endogenous inhibitor of the extrinsic, or tissue factor–based, coagu-lation pathway Phase II trials with recombinant TFPI (rTFPI) showed some promise with respect to mortality

in severe sepsis.77,78 However, a large randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial by Abra-ham et al demonstrated no benefit for rTFPI in patients with severe sepsis and high INR.79Patients who received rTFPI had an increased risk of bleeding

Activated protein C (APC) is a serine protease with both antithrombotic and profibrinolytic properties APC inhibits thrombin generation via inactivation of

Table 2 Laboratory Markers in Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

D-dimer, FDPs, soluble fibrin "

Levels of specific clotting factors (e.g., VII)

#

PT, prothrombin time; INR, international normalized ratio; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FDPs, fibrin degradation prod-ucts; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor, type 1; " , increasing; # , decreasing.

Trang 2

clotting factors Va and VIIIa; it enhances fibrinolysis by

inactivating PAI-1 APC also modulates

anti-inflam-matory and antiapoptotic pathways.80 Low levels of

protein C are predictive of a poor clinical outcome in

septic patients.54–56 Based on these findings as well as

encouraging results from a phase II study,81Bernard et al

conducted a randomized, double-blind,

placebo-con-trolled, multicenter trial to evaluate the impact of a

recombinant human APC (rhAPC), or drotrecogin

alfa activated (DrotAA), on 28-day all-cause mortality

in patients with severe sepsis.82Patients received either

placebo (840 patients) or rhAPC as a continuous

infusion of 24 mg/kg/h for a total of 96 hours

(850 patients) The trial was stopped prematurely after

the second planned interim analysis because of a

statisti-cally significant reduction in mortality in the patients

who received rhAPC In the rhAPC-treated patients,

28-day mortality was 24.7%, as compared with 30.8% in

the placebo population; the reduction in relative risk of

death was 19.4% There was an increased incidence of

serious bleeding in those patients treated with rhAPC

compared with placebo (3.5% vs 2.0%) Subgroup

anal-ysis determined that the largest reduction in mortality

occurred among APC-treated patients with more severe

disease and higher risk of death, as indicated by Acute

Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE

II) scores in the third and fourth quartiles.83Based on

these results, in November 2001 the United States FDA

approved rhAPC for the treatment of adult patients with

severe sepsis and a high risk of death The FDA’s

approval required an additional trial evaluating the

efficacy and safety of rhAPC in patients with severe

sepsis and a low likelihood of death, as defined by

APACHE II scores of< 25 or single-organ failure A

randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of

rhAPC in this population was recently reported by

Abraham et al.84Enrollment was terminated early, after accrual of 2640 patients, due to the low likelihood of achieving a significant reduction in 28 day mortality with rhAPC Twenty-eight day mortality and in-hospital mortality were the same in the rhAPC and placebo arms; serious bleeding was significantly greater in the rhAPC-treated patients In light of these results, the use

of rhAPC should be considered only in those patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death

RECOMBINANT FACTOR VIIA

In 1999, the FDA approved recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for the treatment of patients with congenital hemophilia A or B and circulating inhibitors to factors VIII or IX Recombinant FVIIa has since been evaluated

as a hemostatic agent in a growing number of off-label conditions, albeit primarily in case reports or small controlled trials Areas of active investigation include traumatic bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage, and coa-gulopathy of liver disease Recombinant FVIIa use has also been reported in nonhemophiliacs with acquired inhibitors to various clotting factors, hereditary clotting factor deficiencies, platelet disorders, reversal of anti-coagulation, surgical bleeding, and perioperative bleeding prophylaxis.85The typical charge for a 40mg/kg dose of rFVIIa is approximately $4,000 Important questions remain regarding the efficacy, optimal dose, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa in these populations

Recombinant FVIIa is a genetically engineered analogue of the naturally occurring FVII protein, a serine protease that becomes activated upon binding to tissue factor exposed at areas of endovascular damage

The rFVIIa-tissue factor complex leads to factor X activation, which results in the conversion of prothrom-bin to thromprothrom-bin and, subsequently, the activation of platelets and other clotting factors Although its precise mechanism of action remains a matter of debate, it has been proposed that rFVIIa at pharmacological doses is able to bind to activated platelets and stimulate factor X directly, in a tissue factor–independent manner Factor

Xa, in the presence of factor Va, generates a thrombin burst resulting in formation of fibrin clot localized to the site of injury.85–87

Recombinant FVIIa has been investigated as a universal hemostatic agent in patients with uncontrol-lable bleeding due to traumatic coagulopathy The initial case report, in 1999, described cessation of life-threat-ening bleeding in a gunshot victim following treatment with two doses of 60 mg/kg of rFVIIa.88 Subsequent series of patients with uncontrolled traumatic bleeding have also reported improvements in bleeding and base-line coagulation assays, as well as decreased transfusion requirements, after administration of rFVIIa.89–93The doses of rFVIIa have varied widely in these studies, ranging from 36 to 218mg/kg

Table 3 Scoring System for Overt Disseminated

Intravascular Coagulation

< 100 ¼ 1

< 50 ¼ 2 Elevated fibrin-related markers

(e.g., soluble fibrin, fibrin

degradation products)

No increase ¼ 0 Moderate increase ¼ 2 Strong increase ¼ 3 Prolonged prothrombin time < 3 second ¼ 0

> 3 but < 6 second ¼ 1

> 6 second ¼ 2

< 1 g/L ¼ 1 The above scoring system is for use only in patients with an

under-lying condition known to be associated with disseminated

intra-vascular coagulation.

A score of  5 is compatible with overt disseminated intravascular

coagulation.

Adapted from Taylor et al 68

HEMATOLOGIC DISORDERSINCRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS/MERCER ET AL 291

Trang 3

Two parallel randomized, placebo-controlled,

double-blind, multicenter trials evaluating the safety

and efficacy of rFVIIa as an adjunctive hemostatic agent

in severely bleeding trauma patients were recently

re-ported by Boffard et al.94One hundred forty-three blunt

trauma patients and 134 penetrating trauma patients

with severe bleeding randomly received either rFVIIa or

placebo The first dose of rFVIIa, 200 mg/kg, was

administered following transfusion of the eighth unit

of red blood cells (RBCs), with additional doses of

100 mg/kg delivered 1 and 3 hours later The primary

end point was RBC transfusion requirements within

48 hours of the first dose of rFVIIa In the blunt trauma

study, RBC transfusions were reduced by 2.6 units in the

rFVIIa-treated patients as compared with placebo

(p ¼ 02); the need for massive transfusion (> 20 RBC

units) was also significantly reduced (14% vs 33% of

patients, p ¼ 03) Similar trends were noted in the

penetrating trauma patients, although these did not

meet statistical significance Of note, no significant

differences were observed between treatment arms in

either study with respect to transfusion of other blood

products including platelets, FFP, and cryoprecipitate

There was no difference in the incidence of adverse

events, including thromboembolic complications,

be-tween the treatment groups in either study Although

there was a trend toward improved clinical outcomes

with rFVIIa, such as 30-day mortality and the

develop-ment of multiple organ failure, these differences were

not statistically significant However, the study was not

powered to evaluate these end points

Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage

(ICH) are at significant risk of morbidity and mortality,

due in part to hematoma expansion caused by continued

bleeding or rebleeding within the first few hours after

symptom onset.95 Early intervention with rFVIIa has

been evaluated in patients with ICH in an effort to arrest

hematoma growth and improve outcomes in this

pop-ulation Following a phase II dose-escalation safety

trial,96 Mayer et al randomly assigned 399 patients

with spontaneous ICH diagnosed within 3 hours of

symptom onset to placebo or rFVIIa at doses of 40,

80, or 160 mg/kg, administered within 1 hour of

diag-nosis.97The percent change in intracerebral hematoma

volume at 24 hours and clinical outcomes at 90 days were

measured Patients in the placebo arm experienced a

significantly greater increase in hematoma volume than

those patients who received rFVIIa (29% in the placebo

group vs 16, 14, and 11% in groups given 40, 80, and

160mg/kg of rFVIIa, respectively) Mortality at 90 days

was significantly improved in the three rFVIIa groups

combined as compared with placebo (18% vs 29%,

p ¼ 02) Serious thromboembolic adverse events,

in-cluding myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction,

occurred in 7% of the rFVIIa-treated patients and in

2% of patients in the placebo arm (p ¼ 12)

Coagulopathy is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD).98 Despite limited literature to guide therapy, rFVIIa has been used for both treatment and prophylaxis

of bleeding in patients with ESLD Recombinant FVIIa has been shown to temporarily correct a prolonged PT in nonbleeding patients with advanced cirrhosis.99 Dura-tion of PT correcDura-tion was dose dependent; the mean PT normalized for 2 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours following rFVIIa doses of 5 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 80 mg/kg, respectively Recombinant FVIIa has also been shown

to improve coagulation parameters in patients with fulminant hepatic failure.100,101In a retrospective study

by Shami et al, patients with fulminant hepatic failure who were given rFVIIa and FFP (seven patients) were compared with those who received FFP alone (eight patients).100 Those in the rFVIIa group were able to undergo placement of intracranial pressure monitors more frequently, had less anasarca, and demonstrated improved survival compared with those patients given only FFP

The efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) was recently evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.102Two hundred forty-five cir-rhotic patients with active UGIB were randomized to eight doses of rFVIIa at 100 mg/kg or placebo, in addition to standard treatment measures Although normalization of PT occurred in the majority of patients

in the rFVIIa arm, the study observed no benefit to rFVIIa in terms of the composite primary end point, which included failure to control bleeding within

24 hours of the initial dose, failure to prevent rebleeding between 24 hours and day 5, or death within 5 days In addition, there was no treatment effect with respect to RBC transfusion requirement, the number of elective or emergent procedures performed, the length of stay in the ICU or hospital, or in 5 or 42 day mortality rates The incidence of adverse events, including thromboembolic events, was the same in both groups

Lastly, rFVIIa has been investigated as a prophy-lactic measure in patients with ESLD undergoing specific procedures such as liver biopsy as well as in liver trans-plantation.103–106In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, a single dose of rFVIIa, ranging from 5 to

120mg/kg, was administered to 71 cirrhotic patients prior

to laparoscopic liver biopsy.103The PT normalized tran-siently in most patients; a longer duration of correction was observed with higher doses There was no correla-tion, however, between the time to bleeding cessation postprocedure and the dose of rFVIIa received Two patients experienced thrombotic events, although the authors concluded that these were not clearly related

to the administration of rFVIIa Lodge et al conducted

a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of rFVIIa in

Trang 4

182 patients with cirrhosis undergoing orthotopic liver

transplantation.106 Although rFVIIa significantly

re-duced the number of patients needing RBC transfusion,

there was no improvement in comparison to placebo with

regard to the number of units of RBCs transfused,

intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization rate, total

sur-gery time, or the proportion of patients requiring

retrans-plantation Additionally, there was no difference in the

rate of thromboembolic events between the two groups

In summary, emerging data suggest that rFVIIa

may be an effective drug for control of bleeding in certain

nonhemophilic populations At present, there is

insuffi-cient information to recommend the use of rFVIIa in

many off-label scenarios, particularly in light of concerns

regarding its cost and unclear risk:benefit ratio Further

randomized data are needed to clarify the efficacy, safety,

and cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa in a variety of clinical

settings

REFERENCES

1 Bonfiglio MF, Traeger SM, Kier KL, Martin BR, Hulisz

DT, Verbeck SR Thrombocytopenia in intensive care

patients: a comprehensive analysis of risk factors in 314

patients Ann Pharmacother 1995;29:835–842

2 Hanes SD, Quarles DA, Boucher BA Incidence and risk

factors of thrombocytopenia in critically ill trauma patients.

Ann Pharmacother 1997;31:285–289

3 Baughman RP, Lower EE, Flessa HC, Tollerud DJ.

Thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit Chest 1993;

104:1243–1247

4 Vanderschueren S, De WA, Malbrain M, et al

Thrombo-cytopenia and prognosis in intensive care Crit Care Med

2000;28:1871–1876

5 Stephan F, Hollande J, Richard O, Cheffi A,

Maier-Redelsperger M, Flahault A Thrombocytopenia in a surgical

ICU Chest 1999;115:1363–1370

6 Strauss R, Wehler M, Mehler K, Kreutzer D, Koebnick C,

Hahn EG Thrombocytopenia in patients in the medical

intensive care unit: bleeding prevalence, transfusion

require-ments, and outcome Crit Care Med 2002;30:1765–1771

7 Chakraverty R, Davidson S, Peggs K, Stross P, Garrard C,

Littlewood TJ The incidence and cause of coagulopathies in

an intensive care population Br J Haematol 1996;93:460–

463

8 Cawley MJ, Wittbrodt ET, Boyce EG, Skaar DJ Potential

risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia in a surgical

intensive care unit Pharmacotherapy 1999;19:108–113

9 Shalansky SJ, Verma AK, Levine M, Spinelli JJ, Dodek PM.

Risk markers for thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients: a

prospective analysis Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:803–813

10 Bogdonoff DL, Williams ME, Stone DJ

Thrombocytope-nia in the critically ill patient J Crit Care 1990;5:186–205

11 Drews RE, Weinberger SE Thrombocytopenic disorders

in critically ill patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;

162(2 Pt 1):347–351

12 Bizzaro N EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia: a

clinical and epidemiological study of 112 cases, with 10-year

follow-up Am J Hematol 1995;50:103–109

13 Babcock RB, Dumper CW, Scharfman WB Heparin-induced immune thrombocytopenia N Engl J Med 1976;

295:237–241

14 Warkentin TE, Levine MN, Hirsh J, et al Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin N Engl J Med 1995;332:1330–1335

15 Warkentin TE Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: patho-genesis and management Br J Haematol 2003;121:535–555

16 Francis JL Detection and significance of heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies Semin Hematol 2005;42(3, Suppl 3):

S9–14

17 Rauova L, Poncz M, McKenzie SE, et al Ultralarge complexes

of PF4 and heparin are central to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Blood 2005;105:131–138

18 Visentin GP, Ford SE, Scott JP, Aster RH Antibodies from patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia/thrombo-sis are specific for platelet factor 4 complexed with heparin or bound to endothelial cells J Clin Invest 1994;93:81–88

19 Girolami B, Prandoni P, Stefani PM, et al The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized medical patients treated with subcutaneous unfractionated heparin: a prospective cohort study Blood 2003;101:2955–2959

20 Prandoni P, Siragusa S, Girolami B, Fabris F The incidence

of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical patients treated with low molecular weight heparin Blood 2005;

106(9):3049–3054

21 Wallis DE, Workman DL, Lewis BE, Steen L, Pifarre R, Moran JF Failure of early heparin cessation as treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Am J Med 1999;106:

629–635

22 Warkentin TE, Kelton JG A 14-year study of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Am J Med 1996;101:502–507

23 Wester JP, Haas FJ, Biesma DH, Leusink JA, Veth G.

Thrombosis and hemorrhage in heparin-induced thrombo-cytopenia in seriously ill patients Intensive Care Med 2004;

30:1927–1934

24 Bartholomew JR The incidence and clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Semin Hematol 2005;

42(3, Suppl 3):S3–S8

25 Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Horsewood P, Simpson PJ, Moore JC, Kelton JG Impact of the patient population on the risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Blood 2000;

96:1703–1708

26 Verma AK, Levine M, Shalansky SJ, Carter CJ, Kelton JG.

Frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critical care patients Pharmacotherapy 2003;23:745–753

27 Martel N, Lee J, Wells PS Risk of heparin induced thrombocytopenia with unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis Blood 2005;106(8):2710–2715

28 Warkentin TE Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: patho-genesis and management Br J Haematol 2003;121:535–555

29 Warkentin TE, Greinacher A Heparin-induced thrombo-cytopenia: recognition, treatment, and prevention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Throm-bolytic Therapy Chest 2004;126(Suppl 3):311S–337S

30 Warkentin TE New approaches to the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Chest 2005;127(Suppl 2):35S–

45S

31 Warkentin TE, Kelton JG Temporal aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia N Engl J Med 2001;344:1286–

1292 HEMATOLOGIC DISORDERSINCRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS/MERCER ET AL 293

Trang 5

32 Warkentin TE, Roberts RS, Hirsh J, Kelton JG

Heparin-induced skin lesions and other unusual sequelae of the

heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome: a nested

cohort study Chest 2005;127:1857–1861

33 Warkentin TE Platelet count monitoring and laboratory

testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia Arch Pathol

Lab Med 2002;126:1415–1423

34 Kuo KH, Kovacs MJ Fondaparinux: a potential new therapy

for HIT Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program)

2005;10:271–275

35 Rice L Evolving management strategies for heparin-induced

thrombocytopenia Semin Hematol 2005;42(3, Suppl 3):

S15–S21

36 Crowther MA, McDonald E, Johnston M, Cook D.

Vitamin K deficiency and D-dimer levels in the intensive

care unit: a prospective cohort study Blood Coagul

Fibrinolysis 2002;13:49–52

37 Staudinger T, Locker GJ, Frass M Management of acquired

coagulation disorders in emergency and intensive-care

medicine Semin Thromb Hemost 1996;22:93–104

38 Alperin JB Coagulopathy caused by vitamin K deficiency in

critically ill, hospitalized patients JAMA 1987;258:1916–

1919

39 Cohen H, Scott SD, Mackie IJ, et al The development of

hypoprothrombinaemia following antibiotic therapy in

malnourished patients with low serum vitamin K1 levels.

Br J Haematol 1988;68:63–66

40 Krasinski SD, Russell RM, Furie BC, Kruger SF, Jacques

PF, Furie B The prevalence of vitamin K deficiency in

chronic gastrointestinal disorders Am J Clin Nutr 1985;

41:639–643

41 O’Shaughnessy DF, Atterbury C, Bolton MP, et al

Guide-lines for the use of fresh-frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate and

cryosupernatant Br J Haematol 2004;126:11–28

42 Penning-van Beest FJ, van Meegan E, Rosendaal FR,

Stricker BH Characteristics of anticoagulant therapy and

comorbidity related to overanticoagulation Thromb

Hae-most 2001;86:569–574

43 Raj G, Kumar R, McKinney WP Time course of reversal of

anticoagulant effect of warfarin by intravenous and

sub-cutaneous phytonadione Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2721–

2724

44 Crowther MA, Douketis JD, Schnurr T, et al Oral vitamin

K lowers the international normalized ratio more rapidly

than subcutaneous vitamin K in the treatment of

warfarin-associated coagulopathy: a randomized, controlled trial Ann

Intern Med 2002;137:251–254

45 Wilson SE, Watson HG, Crowther MA Low-dose oral

vitamin K therapy for the management of asymptomatic

patients with elevated international normalized ratios: a brief

review CMAJ 2004;170:821–824

46 Watson HG, Baglin T, Laidlaw SL, Makris M, Preston FE.

A comparison of the efficacy and rate of response to oral and

intravenous vitamin K in reversal of over-anticoagulation

with warfarin Br J Haematol 2001;115:145–149

47 Hung A, Singh S, Tait RC A prospective randomized study

to determine the optimal dose of intravenous vitamin K in

reversal of over-warfarinization Br J Haematol 2000;109:

537–539

48 Riegert-Johnson DL, Volcheck GW The incidence of

anaphylaxis following intravenous phytonadione (vitamin

K1): a 5-year retrospective review Ann Allergy Asthma

Immunol 2002;89:400–406

49 Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrom-botic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest 2004;126(Suppl 3): 204S–233S

50 Esmon CT The impact of the inflammatory response on coagulation Thromb Res 2004;114:321–327

51 Levi M Current understanding of disseminated intravas-cular coagulation Br J Haematol 2004;124:567–576

52 Hambleton J, Leung LL, Levi M Coagulation: consultative hemostasis Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program) 2002:335–352

53 Mesters RM, Mannucci PM, Coppola R, Keller T, Ostermann H, Kienast J Factor VIIa and antithrombin III activity during severe sepsis and septic shock in neutropenic patients Blood 1996;88:881–886

54 Mesters RM, Helterbrand J, Utterback BG, et al Prognostic value of protein C concentrations in neutropenic patients at high risk of severe septic complications Crit Care Med 2000;28:2209–2216

55 Yan SB, Helterbrand JD, Hartman DL, Wright TJ, Bernard

GR Low levels of protein C are associated with poor outcome in severe sepsis Chest 2001;120:915–922

56 Fourrier F, Chopin C, Goudemand J, et al Septic shock, multiple organ failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation: compared patterns of antithrombin III, protein

C, and protein S deficiencies Chest 1992;101:816–823

57 Biemond BJ, Levi M, ten Cate H, et al Plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor I release during experimental endotoxaemia in chimpanzees: effect of inter-ventions in the cytokine and coagulation cascades Clin Sci (Lond) 1995;88:587–594

58 Mesters RM, Florke N, Ostermann H, Kienast J Increase of plasminogen activator inhibitor levels predicts outcome of leukocytopenic patients with sepsis Thromb Haemost 1996; 75:902–907

59 Watanabe R, Wada H, Miura Y, et al Plasma levels of total plasminogen activator inhibitor-I (PAI-I) and tPA/PAI-1 complex in patients with disseminated intravascular coagula-tion and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2001;7:229–233

60 Kobayashi T, Terao T, Maki M, Ikenoue T Diagnosis and management of acute obstetrical DIC Semin Thromb Hemost 2001;27:161–167

61 Gando S Disseminated intravascular coagulation in trauma patients Semin Thromb Hemost 2001;27:585–592

62 Barbui T, Falanga A Disseminated intravascular coagulation

in acute leukemia Semin Thromb Hemost 2001;27:593– 604

63 Toh CH, Samis J, Downey C, et al Biphasic transmittance waveform in the APTT coagulation assay is due to the formation of a Ca( þþ )-dependent complex of C-reactive protein with very-low-density lipoprotein and is a novel marker of impending disseminated intravascular coagulation Blood 2002;100:2522–2529

64 Fernandes B, Giles A An abnormal activated partial thromboplastin time clotting waveform is associated with high mortality and a procoagulant state Lab Hematol 2003; 9:138–142

65 Yu M, Nardella A, Pechet L Screening tests of dissemi-nated intravascular coagulation: guidelines for rapid and specific laboratory diagnosis Crit Care Med 2000;28: 1777–1780

Trang 6

66 Levi M, de Jonge E, van der Poll T, ten Cate H Disseminated

intravascular coagulation Thromb Haemost 1999;82:695–705

67 Horan JT, Francis CW Fibrin degradation products, fibrin

monomer and soluble fibrin in disseminated intravascular

coagulation Semin Thromb Hemost 2001;27:657–666

68 Taylor FB Jr, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M.

Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a

scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Thromb Haemost 2001;86:1327–1330

69 Bakhtiari K, Meijers JC, de Jonge E, Levi M Prospective

validation of the International Society of Thrombosis and

Haemostasis scoring system for disseminated intravascular

coagulation Crit Care Med 2004;32:2416–2421

70 Slofstra SH, van’t Veer C, Buurman WA, Reitsma PH, ten

Cate H, Spek CA Low molecular weight heparin attenuates

multiple organ failure in a murine model of disseminated

intravascular coagulation Crit Care Med 2005;33:1365–1370

71 du Toit HJ, Coetzee AR, Chalton DO Heparin treatment

in thrombin-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation

in the baboon Crit Care Med 1991;19:1195–1200

72 Feinstein DI Diagnosis and management of disseminated

intravascular coagulation: the role of heparin therapy Blood

1982;60:284–287

73 Okabayashi K, Wada H, Ohta S, Shiku H, Nobori T,

Maruyama K Hemostatic markers and the sepsis-related

organ failure assessment score in patients with disseminated

intravascular coagulation in an intensive care unit Am J

Hematol 2004;76:225–229

74 Baudo F, Caimi TM, de CF, et al Antithrombin III (ATIII)

replacement therapy in patients with sepsis and/or

post-surgical complications: a controlled double-blind,

rando-mized, multicenter study Intensive Care Med 1998;24:336–

342

75 Eisele B, Lamy M, Thijs LG, et al Antithrombin III in

patients with severe sepsis: a randomized,

placebo-con-trolled, double-blind multicenter trial plus a meta-analysis

on all randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials

with antithrombin III in severe sepsis Intensive Care Med

1998;24:663–672

76 Warren BL, Eid A, Singer P, et al Caring for the critically ill

patient: high-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: a

randomized controlled trial JAMA 2001;286:1869–1878

77 Abraham E, Reinhart K, Svoboda P, et al Assessment of the

safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in

patients with severe sepsis: a multicenter, randomized,

placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study Crit

Care Med 2001;29:2081–2089

78 Abraham E Tissue factor inhibition and clinical trial results

of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in sepsis Crit Care Med

2000;28(Suppl 9):S31–S33

79 Abraham E, Reinhart K, Opal S, et al Efficacy and safety of

tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in

severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 2003;

290:238–247

80 Esmon CT The protein C pathway Chest 2003;124(Suppl 3):

26S–32S

81 Bernard GR, Ely EW, Wright TJ, et al Safety and dose

relationship of recombinant human activated protein C for

coagulopathy in severe sepsis Crit Care Med 2001;29:2051–

2059

82 Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al Efficacy and

safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe

sepsis N Engl J Med 2001;344:699–709

83 Ely EW, Laterre PF, Angus DC, et al Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important sub-groups of patients with severe sepsis Crit Care Med 2003;

31:12–19

84 Abraham E, Laterre PF, Garg R, et al Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death N Engl J Med 2005;353:1332–1341

85 Roberts HR, Monroe DM, White GC The use of recombinant factor VIIa in the treatment of bleeding disorders Blood 2004;104:3858–3864

86 Hoffman M, Monroe DM III The action of high-dose factor VIIa (FVIIa) in a cell-based model of hemostasis.

Semin Hematol 2001;38(4, Suppl 12):6–9

87 Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Oliver JA, Roberts HR Platelet activity of high-dose factor VIIa is independent of tissue factor Br J Haematol 1997;99:542–547

88 Kenet G, Walden R, Eldad A, Martinowitz U Treatment of traumatic bleeding with recombinant factor VIIa Lancet 1999;354:1879

89 Martinowitz U, Kenet G, Lubetski A, Luboshitz J, Segal E.

Possible role of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in the control of hemorrhage associated with massive trauma.

Can J Anaesth 2002;49:S15–S20

90 Martinowitz U, Kenet G, Segal E, et al Recombinant activated factor VII for adjunctive hemorrhage control in trauma J Trauma 2001;51:431–438

91 Dutton RP, Hess JR, Scalea TM Recombinant factor VIIa for control of hemorrhage: early experience in critically ill trauma patients J Clin Anesth 2003;15:184–188

92 Dutton RP, McCunn M, Hyder M, et al Factor VIIa for correction of traumatic coagulopathy J Trauma 2004;57:

709–718

93 Geeraedts LM Jr, Kamphuisen PW, Kaasjager HA, Verwiel

JM, van Vugt AB, Frolke JP The role of recombinant factor VIIa in the treatment of life-threatening haemorrhage in blunt trauma Injury 2005;36:495–500

94 Boffard KD, Riou B, Warren B, et al Recombinant factor VIIa as adjunctive therapy for bleeding control in severely injured trauma patients: two parallel randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials J Trauma 2005;59:8–

15

95 Qureshi AI, Tuhrim S, Broderick JP, Batjer HH, Hondo H, Hanley DF Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage N Engl

J Med 2001;344:1450–1460

96 Mayer SA, Brun NC, Broderick J, et al Safety and feasibility

of recombinant factor VIIa for acute intracerebral hemor-rhage Stroke 2005;36:74–79

97 Mayer SA, Brun NC, Begtrup K, et al Recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage N Engl J Med 2005;352:777–785

98 Kujovich JL Hemostatic defects in end stage liver disease.

Crit Care Clin 2005;21:563–587

99 Bernstein DE, Jeffers L, Erhardtsen E, et al Recombinant factor VIIa corrects prothrombin time in cirrhotic patients: a preliminary study Gastroenterology 1997;113:1930–1937

100 Shami VM, Caldwell SH, Hespenheide EE, Arseneau KO, Bickston SJ, Macik BG Recombinant activated factor VII for coagulopathy in fulminant hepatic failure compared with conventional therapy Liver Transpl 2003;9:138–143

101 Pavese P, Bonadona A, Beaubien J, et al FVIIa corrects the coagulopathy of fulminant hepatic failure but may be associated with thrombosis: a report of four cases Can J Anaesth 2005;52:26–29

HEMATOLOGIC DISORDERSINCRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS/MERCER ET AL 295

Trang 7

102 Bosch J, Thabut D, Bendtsen F, et al Recombinant factor

VIIa for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with

cirrhosis: a randomized, double-blind trial Gastroenterology

2004;127:1123–1130

103 Jeffers L, Chalasani N, Balart L, Pyrsopoulos N, Erhardtsen

E Safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIIa in patients

with liver disease undergoing laparoscopic liver biopsy.

Gastroenterology 2002;123:118–126

104 Anantharaju A, Mehta K, Mindikoglu AL, Van Thiel DH.

Use of activated recombinant human factor VII (rhFVIIa)

for colonic polypectomies in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1414–1424

105 Hendriks HG, Meijer K, de Wolf JT, et al Reduced transfusion requirements by recombinant factor VIIa in orthotopic liver transplantation: a pilot study Transplanta-tion 2001;71:402–405

106 Lodge JP, Jonas S, Jones RM, et al Efficacy and safety

of repeated perioperative doses of recombinant factor VIIa in liver transplantation Liver Transpl 2005;11:973– 979

Trang 8

Major Complications following

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

ABSTRACT

Tens of thousands of patients undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) annually, 15 to 40% of whom are admitted to the intensive care unit Pulmonary complications are the most life threatening conditions that develop in HSCT recipients

Both infectious and noninfectious complications occur more frequently in allogeneic HSCT The management of HSCT recipients requires knowledge of their immune status, appropriate diagnostic evaluation, and early treatment During the preengraftment phase (0 to 30 days after transplant), the most prevalent pathogens causing infection are bacteria and Candida species and, if the neutropenia persists, Aspergillus species The early postengraftment phase (30 to 100 days) is characterized by cytomegalovirus (CMV), Pneumocystis jiroveci, and Aspergillus infections During the late posttransplant phase (> 100 days), allogeneic HSCT recipients are at risk for CMV, community-acquired respiratory virus, and encapsulated bacterial infections Antigen and polymerase chain reaction assays are important for the diagnosis of CMV and Aspergillus infections Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) and periengraftment respiratory distress syndrome occur in both allogeneic and autologous HSCT recipients, usually during the first 30 days

Bronchiolitis obliterans occurs exclusively in allogeneic HSCT recipients with graft versus host disease Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome occurs at any time following transplant

Bronchoscopy is usually helpful for the diagnosis of the infectious pulmonary complications and DAH

KEYWORDS:Aspergillosis, bone marrow transplantation, cytomegalovirus infection, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome, periengraftment respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency

Tens of thousands of patients undergo

hemato-poietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) annually.1In

allotransplantation, the 100 day mortality rate ranges

between 10 and 40% and the main causes of death are

graft versus host disease (GVHD), interstitial

pneumo-nitis, and multiple organ failure.1In autotransplantation,

the 100 day mortality ranges between 5 and 20% and the

main cause of death is recurrence of the underlying

disease.1As a result of life-threatening multiple organ dysfunctions, 15 to 40% of HSCT recipients receive intensive care unit support, the majority of whom require mechanical ventilation.2–4The mortality rate of HSCT recipients receiving invasive ventilation used to exceed 90%.2,5 Although more recent studies have shown im-provement in outcome, the mortality rate of HSCT re-cipients receiving mechanical ventilation is still high.3,6,7

297

1

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of

Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Bekele Afessa,

M.D., Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo

Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First St., SW, Rochester, MN

55905 E-mail: Afessa.bekele@mayo.edu.

Non-pulmonary Critical Care: Managing Multisystem Critical Illness;

Guest Editor, Curtis N Sessler, M.D.

Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2006;27:297–309 Copyright # 2006

by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York,

NY 10001, USA Tel: +1(212) 584-4662.

DOI 10.1055/s-2006-945530 ISSN 1069-3424.

Trang 9

This review describes the major post-HSCT

complica-tions pertinent to pulmonary and critical care physicians

The management of HSCT recipients requires

knowledge of their immune status, appropriate diagnostic

evaluation, and early treatment The conditioning

regi-men severely depresses preexisting immunity, which

recovers along predictable patterns after transplantation.8

TIMING AND TYPES OF PULMONARY

COMPLICATIONS

Pulmonary complications, occurring in 30 to 60% of

recipients, are the most common life-threatening

con-ditions that develop following HSCT The complications

are more frequent in allogeneic recipients, especially

those with GVHD Both infectious and noninfectious

pulmonary complications occur frequently (Table 1)

(Fig 1) Based on the immunosuppression status, the

posttransplant period is divided into three phases:

preen-graftment, early posttransplant, and late posttransplant.9

The preengraftment phase (0 to 30 days) is characterized

by neutropenia and breaks in the mucocutaneous barriers

as a result of conditioning regimens and frequent vascular

catheterization During this phase, the most prevalent

pathogens causing infection are bacteria and Candida

species and, if the neutropenia persists, Aspergillus species

During neutropenia, there is no significant difference in

the type of infection between allogeneic and autologous

HSCT recipients.10 The early postengraftment phase

Figure 1 Timing of the major infectious and noninfectious complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation BO, bronchiolitis obliterans; DAH, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage; GVHD, graft versus host disease; IPS, idiopathic pneumonia syndrome; P edema, pulmonary edema; PERDS, periengraftment respiratory distress syndrome; PCP, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus Phase I, preengraftment period; Phase II, early postengraftment period; Phase III, late postengraftment period.

Table 1 Major Pulmonary Complications in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Infectious

Viral Cytomegalovirus Respiratory syncytial virus Influenza B

Bacterial Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus pneumoniae Gram-negative

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Fungal

Aspergillus spp.

Candida spp.

Pneumocystis jiroveci Noninfectious

Acute pulmonary edema Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage Periengraftment respiratory distress syndrome Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia Idiopathic pulmonary syndrome

Delayed pulmonary toxicity syndrome Pulmonary cytolytic thrombotic syndrome

Trang 10

(30 to 100 days) is dominated by impaired cell-mediated

immunity The impact of this cell-mediated defect is

determined by the development of GVHD and the

immunosuppressant medications used to treat it

Cyto-megalovirus (CMV), Pneumocystis jiroveci, and Aspergillus

species are the predominant pathogens during this phase

The late posttransplant phase (> 100 days) is

character-ized by defects in cell-mediated and humoral immunity as

well as function of the reticuloendothelial system in

allogeneic transplant recipients During this phase,

allo-geneic HSCT recipients are at risk for CMV infection,

varicella-zoster infection, Epstein-Barr–related

lympho-proliferative disease, community-acquired respiratory

vi-rus infection, and infection by encapsulated bacteria such

as Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae In

certain parts of the world, pulmonary tuberculosis occurs

during the late posttransplant phase.11,12

Noninfectious pulmonary complications also

fol-low a characteristic time pattern.13 Pulmonary edema,

diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH), and

periengraft-ment respiratory distress syndrome (PERDS) usually

occur during the first 30 days following transplant

(Fig 1) Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS) occurs

at any time following transplant

APPROACH TO PULMONARY

COMPLICATIONS

When HSCT recipients present with pulmonary

infil-trates and symptoms and signs of infection, most

clini-cians initiate empirical antibacterial therapy, adding

antifungal therapy if risk factors are present and there

is no response to initial treatment.14Cultures of blood,

urine, and respiratory secretions should be obtained In

the appropriate clinical setting, antigen and polymerase

chain reaction (PCR) assays for Aspergillus and CMV

may be helpful Pulmonary function testing (PFT) and

high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the

chest play important roles in suggesting specific

diag-nosis If tolerated, we advocate early bronchoalveolar

lavage (BAL) with or without transbronchial lung

bi-opsy, transthoracic fine needle aspiration, or

video-as-sisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy because specific

diagnoses may lead to appropriate treatment and avoid

unnecessary and potentially harmful therapy (Fig 2)

INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS

Viral Pneumonia

Viral infections are a major cause of morbidity and

mortality in HSCT recipients CMV is the most

com-mon viral pathogen causing lower respiratory tract

in-fection.15–17 Other viruses, including herpes simplex,

varicella-zoster, Epstein-Barr, and human herpesvirus

6 and 8 may also cause pulmonary infections.18During

endemic seasons, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, picornavirus, influenza virus, and parainfluenza virus should be included in the differential diagnoses of respiratory symptoms in the HSCT recipient.19,20 This section will focus on CMV

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS PNEUMONIA

Epidemiology Although the frequency of CMV pneumonia in the early posttransplantation period has been substantially reduced by prophylaxis, it continues to

be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the late posttransplant period With early detection and prophy-lactic and preemptive treatment, the rate of CMV pneumonia has declined to less than 5%.21–23 Risk factors for CMV pneumonia include older age, positive CMV serology, allogeneic graft, and GVHD.24–28 Clinical Findings and Diagnostic Evaluation CMV infections result from primary infection or reactivation, and most occur between 6 and 12 weeks after trans-plant.29,30 With the wider use of prophylactic therapy, CMV pneumonia may occur beyond 100 days after transplant.12,31 Although rare, CMV pneumonia may develop prior to engraftment, especially in recipients with positive CMV serology.31 The clinical manifesta-tions of CMV infection vary from completely asympto-matic to multiple organ dysfunction HSCT recipients with CMV pneumonia typically present with fever, non-productive cough, dyspnea, and hypoxemia.31

Plain chest radiographs and HRCT usually show subtle patchy or diffuse ground-glass opacities, often with small concurrent pulmonary nodules.29,32,33CMV antigen and PCR assays are used for the early detection

of infection in urine, blood, and respiratory secre-tions.34,35 In the appropriate clinical setting, the diag-nosis of CMV pneumonia relies on the identification of CMV from the lower respiratory tract by BAL and transbronchial or surgical lung biopsy The definitive diagnosis requires positive culture results from BAL fluid samples, and identification of the characteristic cytopathic feature of intranuclear inclusions in either BAL fluid or biopsy tissue.36

Prevention and Treatment The transfusion of CMV seronegative blood products and leukocyte-depleted pla-telets, and prophylaxis and preemptive use of acyclovir, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, ganciclovir, or foscarnet have reduced the rate of CMV infection in high-risk patients

Although ganciclovir and foscarnet are effective for CMV prophylaxis, their use is limited by marrow and renal toxicities, and they are usually reserved for pre-emptive therapy or treatment For the treatment of CMV disease, intravenous immunoglobulin is usually used in combination with ganciclovir or foscarnet.37

COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION/AFESSA, PETERS 299

Ngày đăng: 14/08/2014, 11:20

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN