On the basis of color and solubility, Mulder 1862 classified them into 1 crenic and apocrenic acid, the yellowish to brown fractions soluble in water, 2 ulmic acid and humic acid, the br
Trang 1CHAPTER 2
OF HUMIC MATTER
2.1 CONCEPTS AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
2.1.1 Historical Concepts
Humic matter as defined earlier is composed of a variety of sub-
stances that can be obtained by fractionation on the basis of their
solubility in alkaline and acidic solutions The first humic substances
isolated were compounds soluble in bases, acid solution and water
They were extracted in Sweden by Berzelius (1839), who assigned
them the names of crenic and apocrenic acids, the fulvic acids of today
This investigation was continued by Mulder (1840), a former student
of Berzelius, who in the following years isolated additional humic
fractions On the basis of color and solubility, Mulder (1862) classified
them into (1) crenic and apocrenic acid, the yellowish to brown
fractions soluble in water, (2) ulmic acid and humic acid, the brown
and black fraction, respectively, soluble in alkali but insoluble in acid,
and (3) ulmin and humin, the fractions insoluble in alkali, acid and
water Mulder's accomplishment was followed twenty-seven years later
by the discovery of hymatomelanic acid, isolated by Hoppe-Syeler
(1889) as the ethanol-soluble fraction of humic acid Since then no
9
5
E
B
Z
4
5
8
-
8
2
0
s DO
'%
6
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 2The Nature and Distribution of Humic Matter 15
further achievements of major importance can be noticed in the study
and isolation of humic substances until Oden's (1914; 1919) concept
surfaces a t the start of the twentieth century Considered by many
scientists as based on a more solid scientific foundation, it is in essence
a revision of Mulder7s classification Oden recognizes (1) fulvic acid,
which replaces the use of the terms crenic and apocrenic acid, (2)
humic acid for the fraction soluble in alkali and insoluble in acid, (3)
hymatomelanic acid, a name used earlier by Hoppe-Syeler (1889) for
the humic acid fraction soluble in ethanol, and (4) humus coal, for
replacing humin and ulmin
2.1.2 Concepts in the Early Twentieth Century
Oden's theory, though challenged many times during the years,
has set the stage for the development of the concepts and types of
humic substances followed today It triggered in the beginning a flurry
of investigations and the ligno-protein theory was introduced during
this period by a number of people (Fuchs, 1930a, b, c; 1931; Hobson
and Page, 1932a, b, c; Waksman, 1938), a concept that has dominated
humic acid chemistry and formation till today This theory assumes
humic matter to be the product of reactions mainly between lignin and
protein, two important components of plant tissue Although it is a
very viable theory that is used by Flaig (1975) as the foundation of his
humic acid concept, other theories were presented when more became
known about humic acid chemistry toward the end of the century This
will be discussed in more detail in Chapter 4 on biochemistry and
formation of humic matter
The new burst of research activity has also resulted in the
development of new names, often amounting only to noise in the
nomenclature of humic substances Names, such as rotteprodukte
(rotten or decomposed products) and echte huminsauren (real humic
acid), have been proposed by Simon and Speichermann (1938)
Springer (1938) added humoligninsauren and lignohuminsauren
(lignin- or lignohumic acid) to the confusion Attempts, especially of
fractioning humic acid further into several subtypes, have come up
with more names By manipulation of the fractionation procedures, it
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 316 Chapter 2
has been reported that humic acid can be subdivided into a- and
used for the initial or original humic acid fraction before ethanol
extraction for isolation of hymatomelanic acid, whereas the humic acid
residue, remaining after ethanol extraction, is called simply humic
acid The name P-humic acid has been reserved by Waksman (1936)
for a precipitate produced after adjusting the pH of a fulvic acid
solution to 4.8 with NaOH According to Stevenson (1994) this
p-fraction is an Al-humate with properties similar to an organic
substance obtained by Hobson and Page (1932a, b, c) named
confusing, but the identification of a fulvic acid fraction as a humate is
questionable It is also difficult to call it an AE-fulvate, since it is
insoluble in acid condition Hence the only alternative is the possibility
that the separation of humic acid from fulvic acid in the soil extract
has been conducted improperly or a proper fractionation procedure is
indeed unavailable Consequently, the analysis is fraught with many
errors or uncertainties, justifying claims for the production of artifacts
Although several people agree with a- humic acid a s defined above, it
makes more sense if this name is assigned to the insoluble part of
humic acid remaining after ethanol extraction This residue has
changed in composition and it seems more reasonable to assign it the
symbol a and retain the name humic acid for the original substrate
before ethanol treatment Hence, humic acid can be fractionated by
ethanol into an a-fraction and hymatomelanic acid In analogy to the
above, reference can be made to the division of humic acid into a brown
Germany By using neutral salt solutions, Springer (1938) succeeded
in separating humic acid into a (1) brown fraction (Braunhuminsaure),
soluble in NaC1, and (2) gray fraction (Grauhuminsaure), insoluble in
NaC1 The brown humic acid is said to be highly dispersible, contains
a lower carbon content, and according to Stevenson (1994) has
characteristics of humic matter in peat and in brown coal However,
Kononova (1966) is highly critical of humic matter originated from coal
or peat, since these two materials are formed in anaerobic conditions
completely opposite to the aerobic system present in soils responsible
for formation of soil humic matter Springer's gray humic acid has a
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 4The Nature and Distribution of Humic Matter 17
low degree of dispersion, and is easily coagulated In Stevenson's
opinion, it looks similar to the humic acid in mollisols
With research interest declining among soil scientists facing
resentment due to an apparent identity crisis on humic acids late in
the twentieth century as discussed in Chapter 1, scientists from a wide
variety of other disciplines have taken the lead in humic acid research
Chemists, geochemists, hydrologists and environmentalists have
become fascinated by the ubiquitous presence of humic matter in the
ecosphere In contrast to most soil scientists, they recognize its
profound role in environmental issues, and its effect on migration and
immobilization of industrial and nuclear waste and other pollutants
In industry, medicine and pharmacy, humic substances are recognized
as potential sources for production of valuable chemicals They are
considered commercially viable to be used as surfactants and as
drilling fluids in oil exploration, as well as in medicines for human
health Research in humic matter took a sharp turn away from soil
science to make rivers, lakes and oceans the centers for explorations
and investigations of humic substances The result is that new humic
compounds, assigned exotic names, have been discovered, enlarging
our concept of humic matter The name copropel is presented for a
humic substance, labeled as humus by Swain (1963) and Stevenson
(1994) It has been formed from the decomposition of microscopic
plants in eutrophic lakes and marshes A black mass of humified
material located a t deeper hypolimnetic areas of lakes and bays is
called sapropel, whereas a pondweed type of sapropel, believed to
originate from cellulose-rich plants, is called fdrna by the authors
above A deposit in dystrophic lakes consisting of an allochthonous
precipitate of humic acid and detritus is referred to as dy Marine slime
resulting from settled decomposed plankton detritus is calledpelogoea
and an amorphous, gummy accumulation of humic substances beneath
or within peat bogs is dopplerite Recently, less exotic names have been
used for humic matter present in the water medium It is known by
geochemists under the collective name of aquatic hurnic materials as
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 518 Chapter 2
opposed to terrestrial humic materials for humic compounds in soils
(Christman and Gjessing, 1983)
The few soil scientists, who have continued with humic acid
research, have also yielded some results An alleged new humic acid
fraction, identified by the namegreen humic acid, has been isolated by
Kumada and Sato (1962) Chromatography using a cellulose column
separated a humic acid extract of a spodosol into a green and brown
fraction The green fraction, called green humic acid, is believed to be
derived from a fungal metabolite (Kumada and Hurst, 1967) and has
attracted considerable attention, especially in Japan and New Zealand
In Japan, much value has also been placed in the use of visible light
spectrophotometry in the identification of humic substances The
nature of absorption spectra and values of A log K (= K,,, - KO, in
which K = extinction) are applied to distinguish humic acids into four
major types, e.g., types A, B, R,, and P (Kumada, 1965; 1987; Kumada
and Miyara, 1973; Yoshida et al., 1978) The P-type of humic acid
produces, after separation by gel filtration and column chromatography
with cellulose powder or sephadex, a P, (brown) and P, (green) fraction
The P, humic fraction corresponds to the green humic acid discussed
above However, the existence of green humic acid is later rescinded by
Kumada (1987), who considers the name as incorrect since humic acid
is by definition brown to black in color In his opinion the green
fraction is an impurity commonly co-extracted with the brown (PJ
fraction
In the United States, with many of the prominent authorities
adhering to the concept of humic substances being operational
compounds, no new discoveries have been noticed in recent years
Though not really a major breakthrough, Stevenson's (1994) suggestion
for distinguishing generic humic substances should perhaps be
mentioned in all fairness, though this term had been recognized earlier
by Kononova (1966) and Kumada (1987) The name of generic fulvic
acid is used by Stevenson for fulvic acid purified by the XAD-resin
procedure Accordingly, he believes that fulvic acid can be distin-
guished into a (1) generic or true fulvic acid, obtained by purification
with amberlite-XAD resins, and (2) fulvic acid, obtained after
purification using conventional ion exchangers and dialysis procedures
However, the analogy presented by Stevenson in reference to the
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 6The Nature and Distribution of Humic Matter 19
subdivision ofhumic acid by MacCarthy et al (1979) makes the generic
concept a very confusing issue Peat humic acid is in fact separated
into two subfractions by MacCarthy and coworkers using a pH
gradient elution technique, whereas Stevenson's generic fulvic acid is
just a XAD-resin purified version of fulvic acid, involving no separation
into subfractions a t all Consequently, the correctness ofusing the term
'generic' is still open for questions, whereas the subdivision of humic
acid as discussed above is also suspect More convincing research data
are needed differentiating unequivocally the generic from the
conventional type of fulvic acid No supporting data have been
presented confirming Stevenson's contention that generic fulvic acid is
lower in carbohydrate and peptide contents than conventional fulvic
acid
In summary it can be stated that several new concepts on humic
matter and a variety of new humic substances have been presented or
discovered toward the modern era This has no doubt broadened the
concept of hurnic matter Some of them have been used occasionally
today, though several scientists tend to consider them only of academic
importance However, Waksman's (1938) proposal t o delete all the
names and replace them by humus has not found wide acceptance On
the other hand, Oden's concept on humic acid, fulvic acid and
hymatomelanic acid and Mulder's idea of humin seem to have
weathered all criticisms The trend can be noticed that they are widely
used today by the majority of scientists, though reluctantly by some
Names such as green humic acid, gray and brown humic acid have
been used sometimes, depending on research purpose and interest
2.2 DISTRIBUTION OF HUMIC MATTER
The distribution of humic matter is not limited to the soils eco-
system and to climatic conditions Thought a t first to be present only
in soils, humic matter is currently assumed to be the most widely
distributed organic carbon containing material on the earth's surface
It is present in soils, in water of streams, lakes and the oceans, and in
their foam and sediments, from the tropics to the arctic regions Its
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 720 Chapter 2
presence as a major constituent of the huge deposits of peat, lignite or
leonardite, coal and oilshale adds to the dimension of its wide
occurrence in the world Geochemists are even of the opinion that the
greatest storehouses of humic matter are the oilshales (Swain, 1975)
Though most of the humic matter is a natural product synthesized in
the environment, some are now assumed to be anthropogenic in origin,
such as in polluted waterways, drainage ditches, and sewage ponds or
sewage lagoons Especially in the 'Old World,' such as in Europe,
anthropogenic humic matter, identified as humus of harbor and city
agglomeration sediments has started to become recognized (Cieslewicz
et al., 1996) No doubt, such types of humic matter are also abound in
other parts of the world, where stable civilizations have had the
opportunity to accumulate a lot of organic waste during the centuries
2.2.1 Humic Matter in Soils
Humic matter occurs in all kinds of soils since it is the major
fraction of soil humus Though variations as to its content can be
noticed due to differences in climate and drainage, humic matter can
be found in soils from the lowlands to high in the mountains of warm
tropical to frigid arctic climates It is also present in humid region to
arid region soils Famous for their high organic matter contents are
mollisols, soils under grass vegetation of the semihumid regions
Contents have been reported as high as 5 to 6% in terms of organic
carbon (Stevenson, 1994) This is equivalent to approximately 9- 10%
organic matter, and half of this is estimated to be humic matter The
latter has a composition, characterized by a humic acid content slightly
dominating that of fulvic acid, as noticed by its fulvic acidlhumic acid
ratio ranging from 0.9 to 0.6 (Tan, 1978) Another soil with a similar
high humic matter content is the andosol, a soil occurring in the humid
tropics to the arctic regions (Arnalds et al., 1995; Tan, 1984; Theng,
1980) However, the composition and type of its humic matter differ
markedly from those of the mollisols The fulvic acid content makes up
more than half of the humic matter in andosols, which is in sharp
contrast with that in mollisols The fulvic acid Jhumic acid ratio is often
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 8The Nature and Distribution of Humic Matter 21
noticed to range between 4.0 -1.0 in andosols of the humid tropics
(Tan, 1965; 1964) Another marked difference is that the humic matter
in andosols is present in close association with Al and allophane,
whereas the humic matter in mollisols is more likely present as Ca-
humate and Ca-fulvate Large amounts of humic matter are also
noticed in spodosols, where they are concentrated in the B, or spodic
horizons This is in contrast to mollisols and andosols where the A
horizons contain most of the humic matter The B, horizon deposit of
humic matter is often so thick that it becomes a valuable source for
commercial humate production as is the case in Florida (Lobartini et
al., 1992; Burdick, 1965) Spodosol humic matter has been a favored
material for investigations in Canada, where the results are taken to
apply also for humic matter from other soils (Schnitzer and Khan,
1972; Schnitzer, 1972; 1976) Judging from its formation due to
leaching from the A and E horizons, the general opinion is that
spodosol humic matter is composed of large amounts of fulvic acids
However, recent studies with a spodosol, on the border of Georgia and
Florida, reveal its humic matter to have a composition characterized
by a FA/HA ratio = 0.13, suggesting a humic acid concentration 10
times higher than that of fulvic acid (Lobartini et al., 1991) This
finding supports an earlier report for the Unicamp Company in Florida
showing the Florida source of its humate products to contain 91.3%
humic acid and 8.7% fulvic acid (Tan et al., 1988) Since spodosols are
very acidic soils, conditions favoring dissolution of large amounts of Fe
and Al, the humic substances are mostly in the form of Fe- and
Al-humates and hlvates
Other groups of soils containing hurnic matter are the ultisols
and oxisols, soils generally low in organic matter content due to a rapid
rate of decomposition The oxisols of the humid tropics are notorious for
their low organic matter contents, with contents often reported to be
as low as 1% organic carbon The humic matter in these soils is often
noticed to contain more fulvic acid than humic acid and these
substances are assumed to be present as Fe- and Al-fulvates or
humates (Tan, 1978) However, the lowest organic matter contents are
detected in aridisols, soils of the arid regions and the sandy soils in the
deserts Because of deficiency of water, biomass formation and
decomposition reactions in these dry regions are very limited
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 922 C h a p t e r 2
2.2.2 Humic Matter in Soils of the Wetlands
The soils discussed above are generally well-drained, and the
aerobic conditions encourage the occurrence of rapid decomposition
processes However, under the influence of poor drainage, such as
occurring in marshes and swamps or in general in soils of the
wetlands, anaerobic decomposition prevails (Tan, 2000) Due to lack of
oxygen, the decomposition process is very slow, if not inhibited, and
incomplete, and hence contributes to accumulation of huge amounts of
organic matter Many of the wetlands and some of the lake areas are
eutrophic, encouraging an excessive growth of aquatic weeds and other
plants The latter provide an overabundance of dead organic residue
filling gradually the inundated or wet areas The partly decomposed
organic matter will eventually develop into bogs, peat, and muck,
which are often believed to be precursors for formation of coal and
ultimately fossil fuel (Hatcher et al., 1985) When conditions are
favorable, sapropel, copropel and the like may also develop into peat
and bogs The only conditions required are anaerobic environments for
the accumulation and development into peat and its eventual
conversion into coal
Peat deposits are also not limited to climatic conditions and can
be found all over the world where large amounts of biomass are
available and where decomposition of organic residue is inhibited They
are distributed from the tropical Amazon basin of Brazil and the
coastal regions of Sumatra, Indonesia, to the Baltic coast in Europe
and tundras in Alaska and other arctic regions In addition to excess
water, the frigid temperature in the tundras is another reason for
inhibiting decomposition of organic residue In his opening address a t
the 1972 International Meeting of Humic Substances a t Nieuwersluis,
The Netherlands, Golterman (1975) underscored the importance of
peat as the producer of humic substances affecting the living
environment of the Dutch people Called sometimes peatlands or mires
in Europe and Canada and known as histosols in the United States,
these organic deposits are believed to cover an area of 500 million
hectares worldwide, representing an organic carbon reserve of 1012
metric tons (Mathur and Farnham, 1985), and only the organic carbon
reserve in oilshale is believed to exceed this amount Swain (1975)
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.
Trang 10T h e Nature and Distribution of Humic Matter 23
presented data showing the earth's crust to possess a total organic
carbon reserve of 19 x 1015 metric tons, and most of it (18 x 1015 metric
tons) is stored in oilshales
In contrast to a mineral soil system, where the organic matter
content makes up only a small fraction compared to the mineral
fraction, the organic matter content is an integral and substantial part
of peats or histosols By definition organic soils contain >80% organic
matter and ~ 2 0 % mineral matter (Brady and Weil, 1996) A more
complex definition, used in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1990),
indicates that organic soils must have an organic carbon content >18%
in the presence of > 60% clay, or > 12% in the absence of clay Most of
the information indicates that peats contain large amounts of humic
acids (Zelazny and Carlisle, 1974; Kononova, 1966), though occasion-
ally it is reported that humic matter in peat is composed mostly of
fulvic acids (Schnitzer, 1967) The humic acid content appears to
increase from peat to muck, with the more humified muck noticed to
contain its humic matter mostly in the form of humic acid (Preston et
al., 1981) The elemental composition, spectral characteristics and
other chemical properties of peat humic acids are believed to be similar
to those of humic acids in mineral soils (Mathur and Farnham, 1985)
However, as indicated before, Kononova (1966) was highly critical of
humic matter originated from peat, since the material has been formed
in anaerobic conditions, completely opposite to the aerobic system
present in soils
2.2.3 Humic Matter in Aquatic Environments
It is now an established fact that the distribution of humic mat-
ter is not limited to soils, but it has also been detected in streams,
lakes, and oceans and in their sediments These humic substances may
influence ground water properties and are considered to play an
important role in the geochemical cycle of organic carbon in aquatic
systems They are distributed in what they call dissolved organic
matter (DOM) or dissolved organic carbon (DOC), which according to
Aiken (1985) can be distinguished into two big groups, hydrophobic
and hydrophilic groups Each of the two groups can be subdivided
TM
Copyright n 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All Rights Reserved.