Inertia, Second Moment Vectors, Moments and Products of Inertia, Inertia Dyadics 2334 kg, respectively.. For the system S shown in Figure P7.3.3, find the following moments and products
Trang 1232 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
and
P7.2.8: See Problem P7.2.5 Find the x, y, z coordinates of the mass center G of S Find
P7.2.9: See Problem P7.2.8 Let G have an associated mass of 9 kg (equal to the sum of the masses of P1, P2, and P3) Find
P7.2.10: See Problems P7.2.5, P7.2.6, and P7.2.9 Show that:
and
P7.2.11: See Problem P7.2.5 Find a unit vector n perpendicular to the plane of P1, P2, and
P3 Find also Show that is parallel to n.
Section 7.3 Moments and Products of Inertia
P7.3.1: See Problem P7.2.1 A particle P with mass of 3 slug has coordinates (2, –1, 3),
measured in feet, in a Cartesian coordinate system as represented in Figure P7.3.1 mine the following moments and products of inertia:
Deter-P7.3.2: See Problems P7.2.2 and P7.3.1 Let Q have coordinates (–1, 2, 4) Repeat Problem P7.3.1 with Q, instead of O, being the reference point That is, determine
P7.3.3: See Problem P7.2.5 Let a set S of three particles P1, P2, and P3 be located at thevertices of a triangle as shown in Figure P7.3.3 Let the particles have masses 2, 3, and
G O a
S G x
G O
y
S O y
S G y
G O
z
S O z
S G z
G O
a
S O a
S G a
P O yy
P O yz
P O zz
P O aa
Trang 2Inertia, Second Moment Vectors, Moments and Products of Inertia, Inertia Dyadics 233
4 kg, respectively Find the following moments and products of inertia of S relative to the origin O of the X-, Y-, Z-axis system of Figure P7.3.3:
P7.3.4: See Problems P7.2.5, P7.2.8, P7.2.9, and P7.3.3 For the system S shown in Figure
P7.3.3, find the following moments and products of inertia:
where G is the mass center of S, as determined in Problem P7.2.8 (Compare the
magnitudes of these results with those of Problem P7.3.3.)
P7.3.5: See Problems P7.2.9 and P7.3.3 For the system S shown in Figure P7.3.3, find the
following moments and products of inertia:
P7.3.6: See Problems P7.2.10, P7.3.3, P7.3.4, and P7.3.5 Show that:
P7.3.7: See Problems P7.2.5, P7.2.6, P7.2.7, and P7.3.3 As in Problem P7.2.6 let na and nb
be the unit vectors:
and
Find
Section 7.4 Inertia Dyadics
P7.4.1: Let vectors a, b, and c be expressed as:
S O yy
S O yz
S G yy
S G yz
G O yy
G O yz
Trang 3234 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
where n1, n2, and n3 are mutually perpendicular unit vectors Compute the following
dyadic products: (a) ab, (b) ba, (c) ca + cb, (d) c(a + b), (e) (a + b)c, and (f) ac + bc P7.4.2: See Problem 7.2.1 A particle P with mass 3 slug has coordinates (2, –1, 3), measured
in feet, in a Cartesian coordinate system as represented in Figure P7.4.2 Determine the
inertia dyadic of P relative to the origin O, I P/O Express the results in terms of the unit
vectors nx, ny, and nz
P7.4.3: See Problem P7.2.2 Let Q have coordinates (–1, 2, 4) Repeat Problem P7.4.2 with
Q instead of O being the reference point That is, find I P/Q
P7.4.4: See Problems P7.2.5 and P7.3.3 Let S be the set of three particles P1, P2, and P3
located at the vertices of a triangle as shown in Figure P7.4.4 Let the particles have masses:
2, 3, and 4 kg, respectively Find the inertia dyadic of S relative to O, I S/O Express the
results in terms of the unit vectors nx, ny, and nz
P7.4.5: See Problems P7.2.8, P7.2.9, P7.3.4, and P7.4.4 Let G be the mass center of S Find
the inertia dyadic of S relative to G, I S/G Express the results in terms of the unit vectors
nx, ny, and nz
P7.4.6: See Problems P7.4.4 and P7.4.5 Let G have an associated mass of 9 kg Find the
inertia dyadic of G relative to the origin O, I G/O Express the result in terms of the unit
Trang 4Inertia, Second Moment Vectors, Moments and Products of Inertia, Inertia Dyadics 235
P7.4.7: See Problems P7.2.5 and P7.4.4 Find the second moments of S relative to O for the
directions of nx, ny, and nz
P7.4.8: See Problems P7.3.3 and P7.4.4 Find the following moments and products of inertia
of S for O:
P7.4.9: See Problems P7.2.6 and P7.4.4 Let na and nb be unit vectors with coordinates
relative to nx, ny, and nz as:
Find the second moment vectors
P7.4.10: See Problems P7.2.5, P7.2.6, P7.3.7, P7.4.4, and P7.4.9 Let na and nb be the unit
vectors of Problem P7.4.9 Find the following moments and products of inertia of S relative
to O:
Section 7.5 Transformation Rules
P7.5.1: Let S be a set of eight particles P i (i = 1,…, 8) located at the vertices of a cube as
in Figure P7.5.1 Let the masses m i of the P i be as listed in the figure Determine the moment vectors for the directions of the unit vectors n1, n2, and n3 shown
S O yz
Trang 5236 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
Determine the second moment vectors
P7.5.3: See Problem P7.5.1 Determine the moments and products of inertia (i, j = 1, 2, 3).
P7.5.4: See Problem P7.5.2 Let the transformation matrix between na, nb, nc and n1, n2, n3
have elements S jα (j = 1, 2, 3; α = a, b, c) defined as:
Find the S jα
P7.5.5: See Problems P7.5.1 to P7.5.4 Find the moments and products of inertia (α, β = a, b, c) Also verify that:
and
P7.5.6: See Problem P7.5.3 Find the inertia dyadic IS/O Express the results in terms of the
unit vectors n1, n2, and n3 of Figure P7.5.1.
P7.5.7: See Problems P7.5.5 and P7.5.6 Verify that (α, β = a, b, c) is given by:
P7.5.8: See Problems P7.5.3 and P7.5.5 Verify that:
P7.5.9: A 3-ft bar B weighs 18 pounds Let the bar be homogeneous and uniform so that its mass center G is at the geometric center Let the bar be placed on an X–Y plane so that
it is inclined at 30° to the X-axis as shown in Figure P7.5.9 It is known that the moment
of inertia of a homogeneous, uniform bar relative to its center is zero for directions parallel
to the bar and m2/12 for directions perpendicular to the bar where m is the bar mass
and is its length (see Appendix II) It is also known that the products of inertia for a barfor directions parallel and perpendicular to the bar are zero Determine the moments andproducts of inertia:
FIGURE P7.5.9
A homogeneous bar in the X–Y plane
with center at the origin.
S O cc
B G xy
B G xz
Trang 6Inertia, Second Moment Vectors, Moments and Products of Inertia, Inertia Dyadics 237
P7.5.10: A thin uniform circular disk D with mass m and radius r is mounted on a shaft
S with a small misalignment, measured by the angle θ as represented in Figure P7.5.10.Knowing that the moments of inertia of D for its center for directions parallel to and
perpendicular to its axis are mr2/2 and mr2/4, respectively, and that the correspondingproducts of inertia of D for its axis and diameter directions are zero (see Appendix II),
find the moment of inertia of D for its center G for the shaft axis direction x:
Section 7.6 Parallel Axis Theorems
P7.6.1: Consider the homogeneous rectangular parallepiped (block) B shown in Figure P7.6.1 From Appendix II, we see that the moments of inertia of B for the mass center G for the X, Y, and Z directions are:
where m is the mass of B and a, b and c are the dimensions as shown in Figure P7.6.1 Let
B have the following properties:
Determine the moments of inertia of B relative to G for the directions of X, Y, and Z.
P7.6.2: Repeat Problem P7.6.1 with B having the following properties:
P7.6.3: See Problems P7.6.1 and P7.6.2 For the properties of Problems P7.6.1 and P7.6.2,
find the moments of inertia of B for Q for the direction X, Y, and Z where Q is a vertex
of B with coordinates (a, b, c) as shown in Figure P7.6.1.
112
Trang 7238 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
P7.6.4: A body B has mass center G with coordinates (1, 3, 2), in meters, in a Cartesian reference frame as represented in Figure P7.6.4 Let the mass of B be 0.5 kg Let the inertia dyadic of B for the origin O have the matrix given by:
where n1, n2, and n3 are parallel to the X-, Y-, and Z-axes Determine the components of
the inertia dyadic of B for point Q, where the coordinates of Q are (2, 6, 3), in meters.
P7.6.5: A thin, rectangular plate P weighs 15 lb The dimensions of the plate are 20 in by
10 in See Figure P7.6.5, and determine the moments of inertia of P relative to corner A for the X, Y, and Z directions (see Appendix II).
P7.6.6: Repeat Problem P7.6.5 for a plate with a 5-in.-diameter circular hole centered inthe left half of the plate as represented in Figure P7.6.6
Trang 8
Inertia, Second Moment Vectors, Moments and Products of Inertia, Inertia Dyadics 239
Sections 7.7, 7.8, 7.9 Principal Moments of Inertia
P7.7.1: Review again the example of Section 7.8 Repeat the example for an inertia matrixgiven by:
P7.7.2: A 2 × 4-ft rectangular plate OABC is bonded to a 2-ft-square plate CDEF, forming
a composite body S as in Figure P7.7.2 Let the rectangular plate weigh 40 lb and the
square plate 20 lb
a Determine the x, y, z components of the mass center G of S.
b Find the inertia dyadic of S for G Express the results in terms of the unit vectors
nx, ny, and nz shown in Figure P7.7.2
c Find the principal moments of inertia of S for G.
d Find the principal unit vectors of S for G Express the results in terms of n x, ny,
and nz
P7.7.3: Repeat Problem P7.7.2 if the square plate CDEF weighs 30 lb.
P7.7.4: Repeat Problem P7.7.3 if the square plate CDEF weighs 10 lb.
Trang 10The development of dynamics principles dates back to at least the 14th century, longbefore the development of calculus and other widely used analytical procedures One ofthe earliest statements of a dynamics principle in the Western world is attributed to JohnBuridan in (1358) [8.1]:
From this theory also appears the cause of why the natural motion of a heavy body downward is continually accelerated For from the beginning only the gravity was moving it Therefore, it moved more slowly, but in moving it impressed in the heavy body an impetus This impetus now together with its gravity moves it Therefore, the motion becomes faster, and by the amount it is faster so the impetus becomes more intense Therefore, the movement evidently becomes continually faster.
While this statement seems to be intuitively reasonable, it is not strictly correct, as wenow understand the physics of falling bodies Moreover, the statement does not readilylead to a quantitative analysis
The earliest principles that adequately describe the physics and lead to quantitativeanalysis are generally attributed to Isaac Newton His principles, first published in 1687,are generally stated in three laws [8.2]:
First law (law of inertia): In the absence of forces applied to a particle, the particlewill remain at rest or it will move along a straight line at constant velocity
Second law (law of kinetics): If a force is applied to a particle, the particle accelerates
in the direction of the force The magnitude of the acceleration is proportional
to the magnitude of the force and inversely proportional to the mass of theparticle
Third law (law of action–reaction): If two particles exert forces on each other, therespective forces are equal in magnitude and oppositely directed along the linejoining the particles
0593_C08_fm Page 241 Monday, May 6, 2002 2:45 PM
Trang 11242 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
Recently, researchers have established that Newton’s first law was known and stated inChina in the third or fourth century BC Under the leadership of Mo Tzu it was stated [8.3]:
The cessation of motion is due to the opposing force .If there is no opposing force the motion will never stop This is as true as that an ox is not a horse.
Newton’s laws form the foundation for the principles of dynamics employed in modernanalyses We will briefly review some of these principles in the following section We willthen focus upon d’Alembert’s principle in the remaining sections of the chapter and willillustrate use of the principle with several examples We will consider other principles insubsequent chapters
8.2 Principles of Dynamics
Newton’s laws are almost universally accepted as the fundamental principles of ics Newton’s laws directly provide a means for studying dynamical systems They alsoprovide a means for developing other principles of dynamics These other principles areoften in forms that are more convenient than Newton’s laws for the analysis of someclasses of systems Some of these other principles have been formulated independently
mechan-of Newton’s laws, but all mechan-of the principles are fundamentally equivalent
The references for this chapter provide a brief survey of some of the principles ofdynamics They include (in addition to Newton’s laws) Hamilton’s principle, Lagrange’sequations, d’Alembert’s principle, Gibbs equations, Boltzmann–Hamel equations, Kane’sequations, impulse–momentum, work–energy, and virtual work
Hamilton’s principle, which is widely used in structural analyses and in approximateanalyses, states that the time integral of the difference of kinetic and potential energies of
a mechanical system is a minimum Hamilton’s principle is thus an energy principle, whichmay be expressed analytically as:
(8.2.1)
where L, called the Lagrangian, is the difference in the kinetic and potential energies; δrepresents a variation operation, as in the calculus of variations; and t1 and t2 are any twotimes during the motion of the system with t2 > t1
From Hamilton’s principle many dynamicists have developed Lagrange’s equations, avery popular procedure for obtaining equations of motion for relatively simple systems.Lagrange’s equations may be stated in the form:
K q
Trang 12Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 243
of freedom of the system; and the F r (r = 1,…, n) are generalized forces exerted on thesystem
Another procedure, similar to Lagrange’s equations, is Gibbs equations, which state that:
A principle which we will examine and use in the remaining sections of this chapter,called d’Alembert’s principle, is closely associated with Newton’s laws d’Alembert’s prin-ciple introduces the concept of an inertial force, defined for a particle as:
(8.2.6)
Kane’s equations combine the computational advantages of d’Alembert’s principle andLagrange’s equations for a wide variety of mechanical systems For this reason, Kane’sequations were initially called Lagrange’s form of d’Alembert’s principle
Finally, still other principles of dynamics include impulse–momentum, work–energy,virtual work, Boltzmann–Hamel equations, and Jourdain’s principle We will consider theimpulse–momentum and work–energy principles in the next two chapters The principles
of virtual work and Jourdain’s principle are similar to Kane’s equations, and the mann–Hamel equations are similar to Lagrange’s equations and Gibbs equations
Boltz-8.3 d’Alembert’s Principle
Newton’s second law, which is probably the best known of all dynamics principles, may
be stated in analytical form as follows: Given a particle P with mass m and a force F
∂
∂G q =F (r= n)
r r
˙˙ 1,K,
G m i R P i
Trang 13244 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
applied to P, the acceleration of P in an inertial reference frame is related to F and m
through the expression:
by introducing the concept of an inertia force (see Section 6.9) Specifically, if a particle P
with mass m has an acceleration a in an inertial reference frame R then the inertia force
F* on P in R is defined as:
(8.3.2)Observe that the negative sign in this definition means that the inertia force will always
be directed opposite to the acceleration A familiar illustration of an inertia force is theradial thrust of a small object attached to a string and spun in a circle Another illustration
is the rearward thrust felt by an occupant of an automobile accelerating from rest
By comparing Eqs (8.3.1) and (8.3.2), the applied and inertia forces exerted on P areseen to be related by the simple expression:
(8.3.3)Equation (8.3.3) is an analytical expression of d’Alembert’s principle Simply stated, thesum of the applied and inertia forces on a particle is zero
When d’Alembert’s principle is extended to a set of particles, or to rigid bodies, or to asystem of particles and rigid bodies, the principle may be stated simply: the combinedsystem of applied and inertia forces acting on a mechanical system is a zero system (seeSection 6.4) When sets of particles, rigid bodies, or systems are considered, interactiveforces, exerted between particles of the system on one another, cancel or “balance out”due to the law of action and reaction (see Reference 8.31)
Applied forces, which are generally gravity, contact, or electromagnetic forces, are times called active forces In that context, inertia forces are at times called passive forces.d’Alembert’s principle has analytical and computational advantages not enjoyed byNewton’s laws Specifically, with d’Alembert’s principle, dynamical systems may be stud-ied as though they are static systems This means, for example, that free-body diagramsmay be used to aid in the analysis In such diagrams, inertia forces are simply includedalong with the applied forces We will illustrate the use of d’Alembert’s principle, withthe accompanying free-body diagrams, in the next several sections
Trang 14Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 245
8.4 The Simple Pendulum
Consider the simple pendulum shown in Figure 8.4.1 It consists of a particle P of mass
m attached to the end of a light (or massless) rod of length , which in turn is supported
at its other end by a frictionless pin, at O Let O be fixed in an inertial frame R Under
these conditions, P moves in a circle with radius and center O
The acceleration of P may then be expressed in terms of radial and tangential
compo-nents as in Figure 8.4.2 (see Section 3.7) Then, from Eq (8.3.2), the inertia force exerted
on P may be represented by components proportional to the acceleration components but
oppositely directed, as in Figure 8.4.3
In view of Figure 8.4.3, a free-body diagram of P may be constructed as in Figure 8.4.4
where T represents the tension in the connecting rod, and, as before, g is the gravity
acceleration Because the system of forces in a free-body diagram is a zero system (see
Section 6.4), the forces must produce a zero resultant in all directions Hence, by adding
force components in the radial and tangential directions, we obtain:
P
Trang 15246 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
and
(8.4.2)
or, alternatively,
(8.4.3)and
(8.4.4)
Equation (8.4.4) is the classic pendulum equation It is the governing equation for the
orientation angle θ Observe that it does not involve the pendulum mass m, but simply
the length This means that the pendulum motion is independent of its mass
We will explore the solution of Eq (8.4.4) in Chapter 13, where we will see that it is a
nonlinear ordinary differential equation requiring approximate and numerical methods
to obtain the solution The nonlinearity occurs in the sinθ term If it happens that θ is
“small” so that sinθ may be closely approximated by θ, the equation takes the linear form:
(8.4.5)
Equation (8.4.5) is called the linear oscillator equation It usually forms the starting point
for a study of vibrations (see Chapter 13) Once Eq (8.4.4) is solved for θ, the result may
be substituted into Eq (8.4.3) to obtain the rod tension T.
Finally, it should be noted that dynamics principles such as d’Alembert’s principle or
Newton’s laws simply lead to the governing equation They do not lead to solutions of
the equations, although some principles may produce equations that are in a form more
suitable for easy solution than others
8.5 A Smooth Particle Moving Inside a Vertical Rotating Tube
For a second example illustrating the use of d’Alembert’s principle consider a circular tube
T with radius r rotating with angular speed Ω about a vertical axis as depicted in Figure
8.5.1 Let T contain a smooth particle P with mass m which is free to slide within T Let
the position of P within T be defined by the angle θ as shown Let n and nθ be radial and
Trang 16Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 247
tangential unit vectors, respectively, and let n2 and n3 be horizontal and vertical unit vectors,
respectively, fixed in T
Using the principles of kinematics of Chapter 4 we see that the acceleration of P in an inertial frame R, in which T is spinning, is (see Eq (4.10.11)):
(8.5.1)
where P* is that point of T that coincides with P P* moves on a horizontal circle with
radius r sin θ The acceleration of P* in R is, then,
(8.5.2)
where n1 is a unit vector normal to the plane of T.
The velocity and acceleration of P in T are:
Trang 17248 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
Consider next the forces on P The inertia force F* on P is:
(Recall that P is smooth, thus there is no friction or contact force in the nθ direction.)
These forces on P are exhibited in the free-body diagram of Figure 8.5.2 Then, from
d’Alembert’s principle, we have:
(8.5.10)or
(8.5.11)
By substituting from Eq (8.5.6), and by using Eq (8.5.5) to express n3 in terms of nr and
nθ, the governing equation becomes:
n n n
Trang 18Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 249
Therefore, the scalar governing equations are:
8.6 Inertia Forces on a Rigid Body
For a more general example of an inertia force system, consider a rigid body B moving
in an inertial frame R as depicted in Figure 8.6.1 Let G be the mass center of B and let P i
be a typical point of B Then, from Eq (4.9.6), the acceleration of P i in R may be expressed as:
(8.6.1)
where G is the mass center of B, r i is the position vector of P i relative to G, αααα is the angular
acceleration of B in R, and ω ω is the angular velocity of B in R.
Let B be considered to be composed of particles such as the crystals of a sandstone Let
P i be a point of a typical particle having mass m i Then, from Eq (8.2.5), the inertia force
on the particle is:
Trang 19250 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
passing through an arbitrary point (say G) together with a couple with torque T* Then,
F* and T* are:
(8.6.3)
and
(8.6.4)
where N is the number of particles of B Recall that we already examined the summation
in Eqs (8.6.3) and (8.6.4) in Section 7.12 Specifically, by using the definitions of mass
center and inertia dyadic we found that F* and T* could be expressed as (see Eqs (6.9.9),(7.12.1), and (7.12.8)):
(8.6.5)and
(8.6.6)
where M is the total mass of B.
Consider the form of the inertia torque: Suppose n1, n2, and n3 are mutually
perpen-dicular unit vectors parallel to central principal inertia axes of B Then, the inertia dyadic
IB/G may be expressed as:
i
N
m i
1 1
i
N
1 1
F*= −M R Ga
T*= −IB G⋅ − ×αα ωω (IB G⋅ωω)
IB G =I11 1 1n n +I22n n2 2+I33n n3 3
ααωω
Trang 20Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 251
8.7 Projectile Motion
To illustrate the use of Eqs (8.6.5) and (8.6.6), consider a body thrown into the air as a
projectile as in Figure 8.7.1 Then, the only applied forces on B are due to gravity, which
can be represented by the single weight force W passing through G as:
(8.7.1)
where N3 is the vertical unit vector shown in Figure 8.7.1 Figure 8.7.2 shows a free-body
diagram of B Using d’Alembert’s principle, the governing equations of motion of B are,
then,
(8.7.2)and
(8.7.3)or
(8.7.4)and
Trang 21252 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
where (x, y, z) are the coordinates of G relative to the X-, Y-, Z-axes system of Figure 8.7.1.
Then, by substituting into Eq (8.7.4), we obtain the scalar equations:
(8.7.7)
These are differential equations governing the motion of a projectile They are easy to
solve given suitable initial conditions For example, suppose that initially (at t = 0) we have G at the origin O and projected with speed V O in the X–Z plane at an angle θ relative
to the X-axis as shown in Figure 8.7.3 Specifically, at t = 0, let x, y, z, , , and be:
(8.7.8)Then, by integrating, we obtain the solutions of Eq (8.6.19) in the forms:
(8.7.9)(8.7.10)
(8.7.11)
By eliminating t between Eqs (8.7.9) and (8.7.11), we obtain:
(8.7.12)
Equations (8.7.10) and (8.7.12) show that G moves in a plane, on a parabola That is, a
projectile always has planar motion and its mass center traces out a parabola
From Eq (8.7.11), we see that G is on the X-axis (that is, z = 0) when:
Trang 22Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 253
where d is the distance from the origin to where G returns again to the horizontal plane,
or to the X-axis (see Figure 8.7.3) For a given V O , Eq (8.7.14) shows that d has a maximum
value when θ is 45°
Next, consider Eq (8.7.5) Suppose that the unit vectors ni (i = 1, 2, 3) are not only parallel
to principal inertia axes but are also fixed in B Then, from Eq (4.6.6), we have:
(8.7.15)Equation (8.7.5) then takes the form (see Eqs (8.6.10) to (8.6.12)):
Finally, observe that if a projectile B is rotating about a central principal axis and a point
Q of B is not on the central principal axis, then Q will move on a circle whose center
moves on a parabola Moreover, a projectile always rotates about its mass center, which
in turn has planar motion on a parabola
8.8 A Rotating Circular Disk
For another illustration of the effects of inertia forces and inertia torques, consider the
circular disk D with radius r rotating in a vertical plane as depicted in Figure 8.8.1 Let D
be supported by frictionless bearings at its center O.
Trang 23254 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
Consider two loading conditions on D: First, let D be loaded by a force W applied to the rim of D as in Figure 8.8.2a Next, let D be loaded by a weight having mass m attached
by a cable to the rim of D as in Figure 8.8.2b Let m have the value W/g (that is, the mass has weight W).
Consider first the loading of Figure 8.8.2a The force W will cause a clockwise angular
acceleration αa as viewed in Figure 8.8.2a This angular acceleration will in turn induce acounterclockwise inertia torque component when the equivalent inertia force is passed
through O A free-body diagram is shown in Figure 8.8.3, where I O is the axial moment
of inertia of D, M is the mass of D, and O x and O y are horizontal and vertical bearingreaction components By adding forces horizontally and vertically, by setting the results
equal to zero, and by setting moments about O equal to zero, we obtain:
(8.8.1)(8.8.2)and
(8.8.3)
Next, for the loading of Figure 8.8.2b, the weight will create a tension T in the attachment
cable which in turn will induce a clockwise angular acceleration αb of D and a resulting counterclockwise inertia torque Free-body diagrams for D and the attached weight are shown in Figure 8.8.4, where the term rα b is the magnitude of the acceleration of theweight By setting the resultant forces and moments about O equal to zero, we obtain:
(8.8.4)(8.8.5)(8.8.6)(8.8.7)
Trang 24Principles of Dynamics: Newton’s Laws and d’Alembert’s Principle 255
By eliminating T from these last two expressions and solving for αb, we obtain:
(8.8.8)From Eq (8.8.3), αa is:
(8.8.9)
By comparing Eqs (8.8.8) and (8.8.9), we see the effect of the inertia of the weight inreducing the angular acceleration of the disk
8.9 The Rod Pendulum
For another illustration of the use of Eqs (8.6.10), (8.6.11), and (8.6.12), consider a rod oflength supported by a frictionless hinge at one end and rotating in a vertical plane asshown in Figure 8.9.1 Because the rod rotates in a vertical plane about a fixed horizontalaxis, the angular velocity and angular acceleration of the rod are simply:
(8.9.1)
where θ is the inclination angle (see Figure 8.9.1), and nz is a unit vector parallel to the
axis of rotation and perpendicular to the unit vectors nx, ny, nr, and nθ as shown inFigure 8.9.1
FIGURE 8.8.4
Free body diagrams of the disk and
weight for the loading of Figure
Trang 25256 Dynamics of Mechanical Systems
The mass center G moves in a circle with radius /2 The acceleration of G is:
(8.9.2)
Due to the symmetry of the rod, nr, nθ, and nz are principal unit vectors of inertia (seeSection 7.9) The central inertia dyadic of the rod is:
(8.9.3)
where m is the mass of the rod.
Using Eqs (8.6.5) and (8.6.6), the inertia force system on the rod is equivalent to a single
force F* passing through G together with a couple with torque T*, where F* and T* are:
(8.9.4)
Consider a free-body diagram of the rod as in Figure 8.9.2 where O x and O y are horizontaland vertical components of the pin reaction force: using d’Alembert’s principle we canset the sum of the moments of the forces about the pinned end equal to zero This sumleads to:
or
(8.9.5)
Observe that the coefficient of in Eq (8.9.5), m2/3, may be recognized as I O, the
moment of inertia of the rod about O for an axis perpendicular to the rod That is, from
the parallel axis theorem (see Section 7.6), we have: