䉴BMV TIPS AND PEARLS Ideal Head and Neck Positioningfor BMV Ideally, for BMV, the head and upper neckshould be extended23a to attain a more directpath for the delivered volumes from face
Trang 1Sounds: A number of conditions associated
with abnormal upper and lower airway sounds
may cause difficulty with BMV
A history of snoring has been correlated
with DMV.21As with the obese patient, this may
be associated with redundant oropharyngeal
tissues Early placement of an OPA, and
main-taining a head-extended position will help
Stridor is almost always a sign of
patho-logic airway obstruction and should be
consid-ered an ominous sign Any patient presenting
with inspiratory or expiratory stridor should be
considered as potentially very difficult or
impos-sible to bag-mask ventilate
The patient with “stiff”, poorly compliant
lungs, (often associated with wheezing or rales)
will present increased resistance to bag-mask
ventilation and requires higher than normal
insufflation pressure
The presence of two or more of the factors
presented above significantly increases the
potential for DMV.21The true incidence of DMV
in the emergency department (ED) is not clear
but is likely greater than that seen with the
elective surgical population In the operating
room, DMV has been reported to occur in up
to 5–8% of elective surgical patients.19, 21
Inter-estingly, the DMV rate is twice as high (15.5%)
in patients who were also described as difficult
intubations.19
Prediction of difficulty with BMV is an
important component of the airway assessment,
as BMV remains the “go to” method of gas exchange
both before and between intubation attempts It
also represents a vital decision node in airway
management in two ways:
A Decision making: Anticipated difficulty
with BMV may point to the need for an
awake technique for intubation, especially
if difficulty with laryngoscopy is also
pre-dicted (see Chap 11)
B Defining the failed airway: In the setting
of failed intubation, the inability to maintain
the SaO2 >90% with BMV defines failed
oxygenation, mandating proceeding with
rescue oxygenation via an extraglottic device
or cricothyrotomy (see Chap 12)
One last implication of predicted difficultywith BMV is the automatic need for an addi-tional assistant, assuming a high probability ofrequiring a two-person technique
䉴BMV TIPS AND PEARLS Ideal Head and Neck Positioningfor BMV
Ideally, for BMV, the head and upper neckshould be extended23(a) to attain a more directpath for the delivered volumes from face to tra-chea, (b) to maintain longitudinal tension onthe lumen of the upper airway24 and possibly,(c) to increase retrolingual and retropalatalspace.25 When studied, no additional benefitwas noted with elevation of the occiput (i.e.,the “sniff” position) compared with simple headtilt starting in the neutral position.23
Gastric Insufflation
Protracted periods of BMV or poor technique(e.g., delivering breaths during the expiratoryphase of the patient’s respiratory cycle; notmaintaining an adequately open upper airway;
or using excessive tidal volumes or positivepressure) can lead to insufflation of the esoph-agus and stomach Gastric distention in turnpresents two problems:
• It predisposes to regurgitation of gastric tents, potentially leading to aspiration, withits sequellae
con-• Particularly in children, but also in adults,massive gastric distention can significantlyelevate and interfere with movement of thediaphragm, in turn creating further difficultywith BMV by impacting respiratory systemcompliance In extreme cases, gastric rupturecan occur
Trang 2Gastric insufflation can be avoided by
care-ful attention to delivered tidal volumes,
employ-ing the lowest ventilation pressures possible
(below 20 cm H2O), and using airway adjuncts
such as the OPA and NPA Evidence is
emerg-ing that especially in the cardiac arrest patient,
lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreases
rapidly from the normal 20 cm H2O to as little
as 5 cm H2O, underscoring the need to
mini-mize applied insufflation pressures.26
Applica-tion of cricoid pressure (see below) can also be
considered Although most patients can be
ade-quately oxygenated and ventilated using good,
well-timed BMV technique, some gastric
insuf-flation is inevitable BMV should therefore be
viewed as a “bridging” procedure to be used for
a limited period of time If clinically significant
gastric distention is suspected, an oro- or
naso-gastric tube should be passed to decompress
the stomach
Cricoid Pressure and BMV
Posterior pressure on the cricoid cartilage
com-presses the esophagus between the
cartilagi-nous ring of the cricoid and the body of the
C6 vertebra It is often used to prevent passive
regurgitation of gastric contents during
rapid-sequence intubation, but can also be
consid-ered in the unconscious patient during BMV to
reduce inadvertent insufflation of air into the
stomach,27as discussed above However, it must
be appreciated that cricoid pressure can cause
difficulty with BMV,28, 29especially if applied at
excessive pressures or in an upward direction.30
If this is suspected, it should be at least
tran-siently released, to determine if that is the cause
of difficulty
“AutoPEEP”
The patient with reactive airways disease
experi-ences air trapping and difficulty with exhalation
In all patients, but particularly those with known
or suspected air trapping disease, attention must
be paid to allowing sufficient time for tion during BMV Failure to do this may result
exhala-in a buildup of exhala-intrathoracic pressure, which exhala-inturn risks both cardiovascular collapse and baro-trauma Pressure may also be alleviated simply
by intermittently releasing the seal made by themask against the face
Cervical Spine Precautionsand BMV
BMV can be performed safely in the patient who
is considered at risk for a cervical spine (C-spine)injury, for example, the unconscious traumapatient However, radiologic studies haveshown that movement of the C-spine with BMV
is as much or more than that occurring withlaryngoscopic endotracheal intubation.31–34 Assuch, during BMV, manual in-line neck stabi-lization (MILNS) should be applied Head tiltshould be omitted: jaw lift is the only airway-opening maneuver that should be used
The Clinician with Small orTiring Hands
A one-person technique may be difficult orimpossible for the clinician with smaller hands,
or a clinician of average stature dealing with avery large patient In such situations, early use of
a two-person technique should be considered
Laryngospasm
Laryngospasm is a tight and complete adduction
of the vocal cords It sometimes occurs in response
to attempted airway manipulation in deeplysedated patients, and may be more common inthe pediatric patient Its effects can be dramatic,with an almost total inability to bag-mask venti-late the patient If this is suspected, application
of CPAP with the BVM device will often helpbreak the spasm: simply continue to apply a tight
Trang 3seal with the mask, while maintaining light but
continuous positive pressure on the bag Severe
or recalcitrant cases may require a small dose of
skeletal muscle relaxant, for example,
succinyl-choline 20 mg in the adult patient
All clinicians with airway management
respon-sibilities must be able to assess the critically ill
patient for airway patency and adequacy of gas
exchange BLS protocols should be followed to
open the airway, and if needed, positive-pressure
ventilation with BMV instituted BMV must be
learned and practiced, and should not be looked
upon as an easy skill As the clinician becomes
familiar with basic BMV, various adjuncts and
additions to BMV can be used, such as PEEP
and “pop-off” valves, depending on the
prac-tice environment A formal approach should be
applied to the difficult BMV situation, and the
predictors of difficult BMV appreciated Faced
with ongoing difficulty in performing BMV
and/or intubation, the clinician should consider
placing an extraglottic device such as a laryngeal
mask airway or Combitube
REFERENCES
1.Dorges V, Wenzel V, Knacke P, Gerlach K
Com-parison of different airway management strategies
to ventilate apneic, nonpreoxygenated patients.
Crit Care Med 2003;31(3):800–804.
2 Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al Effect of
out-of-hospital pediatric endotracheal intubation
on survival and neurological outcome: a controlled
clinical trial JAMA 9, 2000;283(6):783–790.
3 Stockinger ZT, McSwain NE, Jr Prehospital
endo-tracheal intubation for trauma does not improve
survival over bag-valve-mask ventilation J Trauma.
2004;56(3):531–536.
4 Stapleton ER Basic life support cardiopulmonary
resuscitation Cardiol Clin 2002;20(1):1–12.
5 Martin PD, Cyna AM, Hunter WA, et al Training
nursing staff in airway management for
resuscita-tion A clinical comparison of the facemask and
laryngeal mask Anaesthesia 1993;48(1):33–37.
6 Caples SM, Gay PC Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the intensive care unit: a concise
review Crit Care Med 2005;33(11):2651–2658.
7 Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, et al Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA 2005;294(24):3124–3130.
8 Mehta S, Hill NS Noninvasive ventilation.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163(2):540–577.
9 Confalonieri M, Garuti G, Cattaruzza MS, et al A chart
of failure risk for noninvasive ventilation in patients
with COPD exacerbation Eur Respir J 2005;25(2):
348–355.
10 Templier F, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al Laboratory testing measurement of FIO2 delivered by Boussi- gnac CPAP system with an input of 100% oxygen.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2003;22(2):103–107.
11 Gabbott DA, Baskett PJ Management of the airway
and ventilation during resuscitation Br J Anaesth.
1997;79(2):159–171.
12 Levitan R, Ochroch EA Airway management and direct laryngoscopy A review and update.
Crit Care Clin 2000;16(3):373–388.
13 Roberts K, Porter K How do you size a
nasopha-ryngeal airway Resuscitation 2003;56(1):19–23.
14 Stoneham MD The nasopharyngeal airway ment of position by fibreoptic laryngoscopy.
16 Schade K, Borzotta A, Michaels A Intracranial
mal-position of nasopharyngeal airway J Trauma.
2000;49(5):967–968.
17 Part 4: Adult Basic Life Support Circulation.
2005;112(24_suppl):IV19–IV34.
18 Wenzel V, Idris AH, Montgomery WH, et al Rescue
breathing and bag-mask ventilation Ann Emerg Med.
2001;37(4 Suppl):S36–S40.
19 Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K The incidence and risk
factors of difficult mask ventilation J Anesth.
2005;19(1):7–11.
20 Davidovic L, LaCovey D, Pitetti RD Comparison of 1-versus 2-person bag-valve-mask techniques for manikin ventilation of infants and children.
Ann Emerg Med 2005;46(1):37–42.
21 Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al Prediction of
difficult mask ventilation Anesthesiology 2000;92(5):
1229–1236.
Trang 422 Walls RM, Murphy M Identification of the
diffi-cult and failed airway In: Walls RM, ed Manual
of Emergency Airway Management 2nd ed.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Willimas and Wilkins;
2004.
23 Morikawa S, Safar P, Decarlo J Influence of the
headjaw position upon upper airway patency.
Anesthesiology 1961;22:265–270.
24 Hillman DR, Platt PR, Eastwood PR The upper
air-way during anaesthesia Br J Anaesth 2003;91(1):
31–39.
25 Isono S, Tanaka A, Ishikawa T, et al Sniffing
posi-tion improves pharyngeal airway patency in
anes-thetized patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Anesthesiology 2005;103(3):489–494.
26 Gabrielli A, Wenzel V, Layon AJ, et al Lower
esophageal sphincter pressure measurement
dur-ing cardiac arrest in humans: potential implications
for ventilation of the unprotected airway
Anesthe-siology 2005;103(4):897–899.
27 Wenzel V, Idris AH, Dorges V, et al The respiratory
system during resuscitation: a review of the history,
risk of infection during assisted ventilation,
respi-ratory mechanics, and ventilation strategies for
patients with an unprotected airway Resuscitation.
2001;49(2):123–134.
28 Palmer JHM, Ball DR The effect of cricoid pressure
on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an
endo-scopic study in anaesthetised patients sia 2000;55(3):263–268.
Anaesthe-29 Hocking G, Roberts FL, Thew ME Airway
obstruc-tion with cricoid pressure and lateral tilt thesia 2001;56(9):825–828.
Anaes-30 Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG Airway obstruction with
cricoid pressure Anaesthesia 2000;55(3):208–11.
31 Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kunzel KH, et al Cervical spine motion during airway management: a cine- fluoroscopic study of the posteriorly destabilized
third cervical vertebrae in human cadavers Anesth Analg 2000;91(5):1274–1278.
32 Aprahamian C, Thompson BM, Finger WA, et al Experimental cervical spine injury model: evalua- tion of airway management and splinting tech-
niques Ann Emerg Med 1984;13(8):584–587.
33 Donaldson WF 3rd, Heil BV, Donaldson VP, et al The effect of airway maneuvers on the unstable
C1-C2 segment A cadaver study Spine 1997;22(11):
1215–1218.
34 Hauswald M, Sklar DP, Tandberg D, et al Cervical spine movement during airway management: cinefluoroscopic appraisal in human cadavers.
Am J Emerg Med 1991;9(6):535–538.
Trang 5• To avoid patient morbidity, esophagealintubations must be immediately recognizedand corrected.
䉴INTRODUCTIONThis chapter will review direct laryngoscopy andintubation, including the initial response to
encountered difficulty Direct laryngoscopy (DL)
is so named because it results ideally in direct
line-of-sight visualization of the glottis (Fig 5–1).While DL is only one method of facilitating defin-itive airway management, it is still the proceduralstandard for intubation in emergencies, and assuch is deserving of a detailed discussion Alter-native intubation techniques, including blind naso-tracheal intubation, are discussed in later chapters
䉴PREPARATION FORENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION
The adage that “your first shot is your best shot”
is very applicable to laryngoscopy and tion Prior to proceeding with any intubation, it
intuba-is essential that the following preparations havebeen undertaken:
䉴KEY POINTS
• Direct laryngoscopy remains the
proce-dural standard for emergency intubation
• The clinician should always
psychologi-cally prepare for a difficult airway, in an
attempt to “anticipate the unanticipated.”
• Special attention must be paid to positioning
the morbidly obese patient to facilitate
direct laryngoscopy
• Cricoid pressure and external laryngeal
manipulation (ELM) are two separate
maneuvers done on two separate structures,
for different purposes
• Failure to engage the hyoepiglottic
liga-ment in the vallecula is a probable cause
of the novice failing to achieve an
ade-quate view during direct laryngoscopy
• Head lift, two-handed laryngoscopy
and ELM represent three ways to use
two hands on the first intubation
attempt (“3–2–1”)
• Beware the “pseudolarynx,” especially in
young children
• A tracheal tube introducer (“bougie”) or
fiberoptic stylet can be used on the first
intubation attempt when “best look” direct
laryngoscopy has failed to yield an
ade-quate view
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Click here for terms of use
Trang 6A Equipment should be assembled and
imme-diately available for management of either a
standard or unanticipated very difficult airway
If possible, this equipment should be
pre-pared prior to the patient’s arrival Ideally, a
dedicated airway equipment cart with all
the necessary tools, checked daily, should
be a fixture in most acute-care areas
B The patient and clinician performing the
intubation should be positioned in the
optimal (allowable) position for direct
laryn-goscopy
C The patient has been optimally
preoxy-genated.
D Large-bore intravenous (IV) access has
been obtained and a fluid bolus delivered,
when appropriate
E Drugs needed to facilitate airway
manage-ment are available Care should be taken to
match the drug type and dosage with the
patient and any acute or underlying chronic
conditions
F Personnel: Airway management is not a
one-person job At least one assistant is
nec-essary to help, guided by specific directions
If problems are anticipated, this should becommunicated to the team, and roles assignedbefore getting started
INTUBATION
A well-equipped airway cart is not useful unless
it is at the bedside and its contents are familiar.The following mnemonic may be helpful toensure that essential pieces of equipment are
immediately available: STOP “I” “C” BARS.
Suction—Rigid tonsillar suction is vital, turned
on and placed in close proximity to thepatient’s head If there is a high likelihood
of encountering copious amounts of blood
or regurgitated matter, two running suctionsare not excessive The suction tubing mustFigure 5–1 Direct laryngoscopy is so-named as it affords a direct line-of-sight view from the clinician’s eye to the laryngeal inlet.
Trang 7be connected to an appropriate wall unit.
The rigid suction catheter should be checked
to see if it has a thumb port that must be
occluded to work effectively
Tubes—An appropriately sized endotracheal
tube (ETT, e.g., adult female 7.0; adult male
8.0 internal diameter, [ID]) is prepared, as
well as a tube a half or full size smaller
Rarely is a larger tube size required in an
adult patient A 10 cc syringe is attached to
the pilot line, and the cuff integrity checked
by fully inflating, then deflating it The ETT
tip can be lubricated with 2% lidocaine jelly
or other water soluble lubricant For all
emer-gency intubations, a lubricated stylet should
be inserted into the ETT If a curved
Mac-intosh blade is used, the stylet curve should
not exceed the default curvature of the ETT
Alternatively, and in particular for a straight
blade, a “straight to cuff” shape will be
ben-eficial, whereby the tube is styletted
straight, with a 25–35° upward bend placed
just proximal to the cuff1(Fig 5–2) For atric patients, the Broselow tape can be con-sulted for appropriate ETT sizing
pedi-Oxygen and positive pressure—A manual
resuscitator with oxygen reservoir bag,attached to high flow O2,should be avail-able As the only source of positive pressureventilation, this device should be checked
by occluding the patient end with a fingerand squeezing the self-inflating bag, feelingfor the positive pressure thus developed.The reservoir bag should be distended
Pharmacology—All the drugs that could
possi-bly be needed should be drawn up and
labeled This may include drugs needed for
topical airway anesthesia, IV sedation, orrapid-sequence intubation (RSI), includinginduction agent and muscle relaxant Thearmamentarium should always include anagent to treat postintubation hypotension—merely instituting positive pressure ventila-tion can interfere with venous return and
Figure 5–2 “Straight to cuff” stylet preparation of the ETT (above) compared to natural curve (below).
Trang 8cause hypotension, particularly in the
vol-ume-depleted patient
Intravenous access—Good IV access (ideally
18G or larger) should be in situ,
free-flowing and not on a pump It is rare that
a patient will not benefit from a fluid bolus
of 10–20 mL/kg prior to intubation
Connect to monitors and Confirmation—During
intubation, the patient should ideally be
mon-itored with an electrocardiogram (ECG) tracing,
noninvasive blood pressure cuff (cycling at
intervals of no longer than 3 minutes), and a
pulse oximeter In addition, objective means
for confirming tracheal location of the ETT
should be available, for example, capnometry
and/or an esophageal detector device
Blades and Bougie—The laryngoscope should
be checked for bright light intensity
Sev-eral blades should be available The #3
Mac-intosh (curved) blade will be useful as a
default blade, with the #4 for larger males
To those familiar with it, a straight blade
(e.g., Miller, Phillips, or Wisconsin) can be
a useful primary or alternative blade A
tra-cheal tube introducer (bougie) should be
within easy reach during all emergency
intu-bation attempts
Alternative intubation device—In addition to
the bougie, during every emergency
intuba-tion attempt, equipment for an alternative
intubation technique should be available for
immediate use Examples include the LMA
FastrachTM
(Intubating Laryngeal Mask
Air-way [ILMA]), fiberoptic optical stylet, or
Tra-chlight These devices all require
prepara-tion by someone familiar with their use If
the patient is being bag-mask ventilated
with difficulty in between intubation
attempts, the primary clinician will not be
available to prepare this equipment
Rescue oxygenation technique—A Laryngeal
Mask Airway (e.g., LMA ClassicTM
, ProSeal,Supreme, or Fastrach), Combitube, or other
extraglottic device is useful as a rescue
oxy-genation tool One such device should be
sized for the patient and within arm’s reach
for the infrequent failed intubation or failedoxygenation (Chap 12) situation
Surgical (i.e., cricothyrotomy) technique—For
most intubations, simply knowing the ment’s location and how to use it is adequatepreparation However, for anticipated verydifficult situations, it may be appropriate tohave this equipment out and opened: a com-ponent of the so-called “double set-up”
equip-䉴POSITIONING FORLARYNGOSCOPY ANDINTUBATION
The clinician should be optimally positionedbefore an intubation attempt, as should the patient
Clinician Positioning
Comparisons of the posture of experienced andnovice laryngoscopists have observed the fol-lowing: experienced clinicians stand furtherback, with straighter backs and arms,2and holdthe laryngoscope closer to the base of theblade3(Fig 5–3) During direct laryngoscopy,the laryngoscopist’s arm should be only mod-estly flexed at the elbow and adducted, and notbent at right angles and abducted Better mechan-ical advantage is then developed by the applica-tion of a more in-line axial force through the arm
to the handle of the laryngoscope Once a view
of the laryngeal inlet is obtained, some clinicianselect to keep the arm adducted against the trunkfor additional support This position of the arm isconsistent with the optimal distance from thelaryngoscopist’s eye to the patient’s glottis ofapproximately 16–18 inches Attention to clinicianpositioning may help deliver favorable mechanicaland visual advantage during laryngoscopy
Patient Positioning
Three aspects of patient positioning are crucial.Failure to observe these positioning principlesmay make obtaining a good view at laryn-goscopy more difficult
Trang 9A “Up-down,” referring to stretcher height.
Often overlooked, the patient should be at the
appropriate height—with the middle of the
patient’s head at the level of the clinician’s belt
buckle
B “North-south”: the patient’s head should
be positioned as close as possible to theupper (“north”) end of the stretcher
C “Sniff,” that is, head and neck positioning.
Classic teaching suggests placing the headFigure 5–3 Clinician positioning during direct laryngoscopy: relatively straight back; modestly flexed, adducted elbow, and a grip on the laryngoscope handle close to the blade.
Trang 10and neck in the “sniffing” position for direct
laryngoscopy When not contraindicated by
C-spine precautions, this involves flexing
the neck at the cervico-thoracic junction,
with extension of the neck at the upper few
cervical vertebrae and head at the
occipito-cervical junction This will help align airway
axes, in turn helping attain a direct
line-of-sight view from the clinician’s eye to the
laryn-geal inlet (Fig 3–8, Chap 3) The sniffing
position can be attained by placing folded
blankets (about 4”/8 cm high) under the
patient’s occiput and/or lifting the head ing laryngoscopy, using the right hand underthe occiput
dur-The axis alignment sought by placing thepatient in the sniffing position can be exter-nally referenced Observing the patient fromthe side, when the external auditory meatus islined up horizontally with the sternal notch, thepatient is generally well positioned for laryn-goscopy in a good “sniff” position (Figs 5–4 Aand B) This same “ear-to-sternum” positioning
Figures 5–4 In contrast to the positioning of the patient in the neutral position (A), a line drawn from the external auditory meatus to the patient’s sternum (“ear to sternum” line) will give a rough indication of good positioning for direct laryngoscopy (B).
A
B
Trang 11is also key to positioning the morbidly obese
patient4(see next section) While some recent
publications have suggested that
cervicotho-racic flexion is not a necessary component of
optimal positioning for laryngoscopy,5–7other
studies challenge this contention by
suggest-ing the utility of a head lift8,9in improving
laryn-geal view
䉴POSITIONING IN SPECIAL
SITUATIONS
C-Spine Precautions
In the patient requiring C-spine precautions,
the sniff position is not an option DL under
these conditions will be more difficult, with an
expected incidence of blind, Grade 3 views
(no part of the glottis visible) of 20%–25%10
with application of manual in-line neck
stabi-lization (MILNS) The incidence of Grade 3
views increases to 50% or more10, 11with a
cer-vical collar applied For this reason, during
attempts at laryngoscopy and intubation,
MILNS should be substituted for the cervical
collar, as the latter increases difficulty by also
interfering with mouth opening Note that the
function of in-line stabilization is as a reminder
to the laryngoscopist to minimize movement,
not necessarily to preclude any movement
whatsoever
Morbid Obesity
Airway management in the morbidly obesepatient can be difficult in terms of bag-mask ven-tilation (BMV), laryngoscopy and intubation, aswell as cricothyrotomy In this population, unlessthe patient is well positioned, during laryn-goscopy, the handle of the laryngoscope mayabut the chest wall Specially made short handlescan be used in this situation but are usually unnec-essary when the patient is properly positioned.Such positioning can be attained by building aramp with folded blankets (Fig 5–5) Five to sevenfolded blankets are placed under the occiput, 3–5under the shoulders, and 1–3 under the scapulae.This will elevate the face above the chest walland eliminate the concern of the handle hittingthe chest During “ramping,” the unsupportedarms are allowed to fall to the side, taking withthem additional soft tissue from the anterior chest.These benefits cannot be accomplished bysimply raising the head of the bed, nor by just lift-ing the head of the obese patient at laryngoscopy.Ramping is required in the morbidly obese patient
to achieve the previously mentioned “ear tosternum” positioning4(Fig 5–6 A and B)
Trang 12Tipping the gravid uterus to the left will help
avoid compression of the aorta and inferior
vena cava, which can otherwise cause supine
hypotension syndrome There is also a higher
incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and
intu-bation in the obstetrical population,12 and
pregnant patients in the second and thirdtrimesters should be considered at high risk forpassive regurgitation
Both morbidly obese and third trimesterpregnant patients have a limited functionalresidual capacity, and can be expected to
Figure 5–6 A morbidly obese patient (A) before and (B) after positioning on a “ramp” of folded blankets Note the “ear-sternum” line before and after
A
B
Trang 13desaturate quickly when rendered apneic, for
example, during an RSI
The Patient in Extreme Respiratory
Distress
The acutely dyspneic patient will not tolerate
the supine position If an awake intubation is
planned, the patient can be intubated in the ting or semisitting position using DL or otherintubation technique In this situation, the clin-ician may need to be positioned on a chair atthe patient’s head (Fig 5–7) If an RSI is planned,the patient will need to be in the sitting positionuntil loss of consciousness occurs with theinduction agent
sit-Figure 5–7 Sitting position direct laryngoscopy Note laryngoscopist initially guiding laryngoscope blade with fingers of right hand.
Trang 14The Pediatric Patient
The neonate, with its large head and occiput
relative to the thorax, will often end up with the
neck excessively flexed, if placed supine on a
table This is the one situation in which a folded
towel may need to be placed under the
shoul-ders, to decrease lower C-spine flexion to the
same degree that is needed in the adult The
toddler and young child (to approximately
age six) will be well-positioned merely placed
with the head flat on a table Above age six,
positioning with the usual towel or folded
blanket under the occiput will be needed
During the preparation phase, the patient
should receive as close to 100% O2as possible
Holding a manual resuscitator (supplying O2
at 15 L/min, with a functioning O2 reservoir
system) firmly on the face is ideal If the
patient’s spontaneous ventilations are felt to
be inadequate, timed inspiratory assisted
ven-tilation may be required Obviously, in the
apneic patient, positive pressure ventilation
will be needed Preoxygenation is a vitally
important step Unintentionally
omit-ting this step puts the patient at risk of
profound hypoxemia during attempted
intubation.
Laryngoscopes and Blades
The laryngoscope used for DL consists of a blade
and handle: the handle houses the power supply
and sometimes the light source Generally the
laryngoscope blade snaps on to the top of a
handle Rotating the blade to a position 90° to
the handle activates the illumination supply,
which is delivered toward the tip of the blade
Some blades have a distal bulb-on-blade design,
while others transmit light from a bulb located
in the handle to the blade tip via a fiberopticbundle A fiberoptic laryngoscope with arechargeable battery system is likely the mostdependable and has the potential to provide thebrightest lighting Blades can be reusable or dis-posable Disposable blades are made of plastic
or steel As the most important piece of tion equipment, the laryngoscope should be ofreliable quality
intuba-Familiar to many clinicians, the Macintosh
blade (Fig 5–8) is curved, designed to partiallyconform to the shape of the tongue It is mostoften used by placing the blade tip in the val-lecula, at the junction of the base of the tongueand origin of the epiglottis As the blade tip ispressed into this space and lifted, pressure onthe hyoepiglottic ligament will help indirectlylift the epiglottis anteriorly, exposing theunderlying glottic opening A size 3 Macintoshblade will be appropriate in the majority ofadult patients, although in larger patients, espe-cially those with long necks, a Macintosh 4 blademay be needed Also note that curved bladescan be used to directly “pick up” or elevate theepiglottis
Straight laryngoscope blades (Fig 5–9) such
as the Miller, Phillips, or Wisconsin are
designed primarily to displace the tongue tothe left and directly elevate the epiglottis, thusexposing the vocal cords Often used as theblades of choice in pediatric patients, they canalso be useful in the adult patient with an “ante-rior” larynx, small mandible, large tongue, orprominent central incisors.13 Many straight
blade aficionados prefer its use by a glossal approach, whereby the blade is placed
para-alongside the tongue, on its right Thisapproach has been shown to be effective insome situations where curved blade laryn-goscopy had failed.14
Finally, specialty blades exist to help in
dif-ficult situations The McCoy blade, also known
as the levering tip or CLM McCoy) blade, has the basic shape of the
(Corazelli-London-Macintosh, but in addition, features a levering
Trang 15distal tip When an activating lever is depressed
toward the laryngoscope handle (Figs 5–10 A
and B), the blade tip levers upward, helping
to elevate the epiglottis (Figs 5–11 A and B)
The literature suggests it may be useful inconverting Grade 3 views to 2 or better, par-ticularly when caused by applied manual in-linestabilization.15–18
Figure 5–8 Macintosh size 3 and 4 (adult) curved blades.
Figure 5–9 From left to right, Wisconsin, Phillips, and Miller straight blades
Trang 16Figure 5–10 A, B The McCoy (CLM) blade, (A) in the neutral and (B) partially activated positions.
Figure 5–11 Fluoroscopic images of the McCoy blade (A) before and (B) after partial blade tip activation (the arrow in both images points to the epiglottis)