Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils phần 2 ppsx

Normally, we link equilibrium considerations to deformations through constitutive behav- ior and do not introduce constitutive behavior directly into the stress variable.” Reexamination

4 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

where

u, = pore-air pressure

x = a parameter related to the degree of saturation of

The magnitude of the x parameter is unity for a saturated

soil and zero for a dry soil The relationship between x and

the degree of saturation, S, was obtained experimentally

Experiments were performed on cohesionless silt (Donald,

1961) and compacted soils (Blight l%l), as shown in Fig

3.l(a) and 3 I@), respectively Figure 3.1 demonstrates

the influence of the soil type on the x parameter (Bishop

and Henkel, 1962) Bishop et al (1960) presented the re-

sults of triaxial tests performed on saturated and unsatu-

rated soils in an attempt to substantiate the use of Bishop’s

equation [i.e., Eq (3.3)]

Bishop and Donald (1961) published the results of triax-

ial tests on an unsaturated silt in which the total, pore-air,

and pore-water pressures were controlled independently

During the tests, the confining, pore-air, and pore-water

Degree of saturation, S (%)

(b)

Figure 3.1 The relationship between the x parameter and the

degree of saturation, S (a) x values for a cohesionless silt (after

Donald, 1961); (b) x values for compacted soils (after Blight,

1961)

pressures (Le., a,, u,, and u,) were varied in such a way

that the (u3 - u,) and (u, - uw) variables remained con- stant The results showed that the stress-strain curve re- mained monotonic during these changes This lent credi- bility to the use of Eq (3.3); however, the test results equally justify the use of independent stress state variables

Aitchison (1961) proposed the following effective stress

equation at the Conference on Pore Pressure and Suction

in Soils, London, in 1960:

uf = u + J.p” (3.4)

where

p” = pore-water pressure deficiency

J = a parameter with values ranging fmm zero to one Jennings (1961) also proposed an effective stress equa- tion at the same conference:

same (i.e., 0‘ = x = 1c, = 6) Only Bishop’s form [i.e.,

Eq (3.3)] references the total and pore-water pressures to the pore-air pressure The other equations simply use gauge pressures which are referenced to the external air pressure

Jennings and Burland (1962) appear to be the first to sug-

gest that Bishop’s equation did not provide an adequate relationship between volume change and effective stress for most soils, particularly those below a critical degree of sat- uration The critical degree of saturation was estimated to

be approximately 20% for silts and sands, and as high as 8540% for clays

Coleman (1962) suggested the use of “reduced” stress

variables, (a, - u,), (u3 - u,), and (u, - u,), to represent the axial, confining, and pore-water pressures, respec- tively, in triaxial tests The constitutive relations for vol- ume change in unsaturated soils were then formulated in terms of the above stress variables

In 1963, Bishop and Blight reevaluated the proposed ef-

fective stress equation [Le., E!q (3.3)] for unsaturated soils

It was noted that a variation in matric suction, (u, - uw),

did not result in the same change in effective stress as did

a change in the net normal stress, (a - u,) A graphical presentation was suggested for volume change (or void ra- tio change, Ae) versus the (a - u,) and (u, - u,) stress variables This further reinforced the use of the stress state variables in an independent manner Blight (1965) con-

cluded that the proposed effective stress equation depends

tally

stress variable Experiments have demonstrated that the ef- fective stress equation is not single-valued Rather, there

is a dependence on the stress path followed The soil pa- meter used in the effective stress equation appears t~ be

difficult to evaluate In general, the proposed effective stress

equations have not received much recent attention in de- scribing the mechanical behavior of unsaturated soils In refemng to the application of Bishop’s effective stress equation, Morgenstern (1979) stated that the equation has

“-proved to have little impact on practice The parameter

x when determined for volume change behaviour was found

to differ when determined for shear strength.”

Probably more impottant than the above experimental dif- ficulties is the philosophical difficulty in justifying the use

of soil properties in the description of a stress state Mor-

genstern (1979) stated, “The effective stress is a stress

variable and hence related to equilibrium considerations alone while [Equation 3.31 contains a parameter, x , that

bears on constitutive behavior This parameter is found

by assuming that the behavior of a soil can be expressed uniquely in terms of a single effective stress variable and

by matching unsaturated behaviour with saturated behav- ior in order to calculate x Normally, we link equilibrium considerations to deformations through constitutive behav- ior and do not introduce constitutive behavior directly into the stress variable.” Reexamination of the proposed effective stress equations has led many researchers to sug- gest the use of independent stress state variables [e.g.,

(a - u,) and (u, - u,)] to describe the mechanical behav- ior of unsaturated soils

Fredlund and Morgenstern (1977) presented a theoretical stress analysis of an unsaturated soil on the basis of multi- phase continuum mechanics The unsaturated soil was con- sidered as a four-phase system The soil particles were as- sumed to be incompressible and the soil was treated as though it were chemically inert These assumptions are

consistent with those used in saturated soil mechanics The analysis concluded that any two of three possible normal stress variables can be used to describe the stress state of an unsaturated soil In other words, there are three possible combinations which can be used as stress state variables for an unsaturated soil These are: 1) (a - u,)

and (u, - u,), 2) (a - u,) and (u, - u,), and 3) (a - u,)

and (a - u,) In a three-dimensional stress analysis, the stress state variables of an unsaturated soil form two in- dependent stress tensors These are discussed in the follow- ing sections The proposed stress state variables for unsat- urated soils have also been experimentally tested (Fredlund, 1973)

The stress state variables can then be used to formulate constitutive equations to describe the shear strength behav- ior and the volume change behavior of Unsaturated soils This eliminates the need to find a single-valued effective stress equation that is applicable to both shear strength and volume change problems The use of independent stress

on the type of process to which the soil was subjected

Burland (1954, 1965) fulther questioned the validity of the

proposed effective stress equation, and suggested that the

mechanical behavior of unsaturated soils should be inde-

pendently related to the stress variables, (a - u,) and

(u, - u,), whenever possible

Richards (1966) incorporated a solute suction component

into the effective stress equation:

Little reference has subsequently been made to this equa-

tion Aitchison (1967) pointed out the complexity associ-

ated with the x parameter He stated that a specific value

of x may only relate to a single combination of (a) and

(u, - ro,) for a particular stress path It was suggested that

the terms (a) and (u, - u,) be separated in analyzing the

behavior of unsaturated soils Later, constitutive relation-

ship data (Aitchison and Woodbum, 1969) were presented

in accordance with the proposed independent stress vari-

ables

Matyas and Radhakrishna (1968) introduced the concept

of “state parameters” in describing the volumetric behav-

ior of unsaturated soils Volume change was presented as

a three-dimensional surface with respect to the state param-

eters, (a - u,) and (u, - u,) Barden et al (1969a) also

suggested that the volume change of unsaturated soils be

analyzed in terms of the separate components of applied

stress, (a - u,), and suction, (u, - u,)

Brackley (1971) examined the application of the effective

stress principle to the volume change behavior of unsatu-

rated soils He concluded from his test results that there

was a limit to the use of a single-valued effective stress

equation

Aitchison (1965a, 1973) presented an effective stress

equation slightly modified from that of Richards (1966):

xm and xs = soil parameters which are normally within

the range of 0-1, which are dependent upon

the stress path

The above history shows that considerable effort has been

extended in the search for a single-valued effective stress

equation for unsaturated soils Numerous effective stress

equations have been proposed All equations incorporate a

soil parameter in order to form a single-valued effective

42 3 STRESSSTATEVAWLES

state variables has produced a more meaningful description

of unsaturated soil behavior, and forms the basis for for-

mulations in this book

UNSA"RATED SOILS

The mechanical behavior of soils is controlled by the same

stress variables which control the equilibrium of the soil

structure Therefore, the stress variables required to de-

scribe the equilibrium of the soil structure can be taken as

the stress state variables for the soil The stress state vari-

ables must be expressed in terms of the measurable stresses,

such as the total stress, u, the pore-water pressure, uwr and

the pore-air pressure, u, An equilibrium stress analysis

can be performed for an unsaturated soil after considering

the state of stress at a point in the soil

3.2.1 Equilibrium Analysis for Unsaturated Soils

There are two types of forces that can act on an element of

soil These are body forces and surface forces Body fowes

act through the centroid of the soil element, and are ex-

pressed as a force per unit volume Gravitational and in-

teraction forces between phases are examples of body

forces Surface forces, such as external loads, act only on

the boundary surface of the soil element The average value

of a surface force per unit area tends to a limiting value as

the surface area approaches zero This limiting value is

called the stress vector or the surface traction on a given

surface The component of the stress vector perpendicular

to a plane is defined as a normal stress, u The stress com-

ponents parallel to a plane am referred to as shear stresses,

an infinite number of planes (or surfaces) that can be passed through a point in a soil mass The stress state at a point can be analyzed by considering all the

stresses acting on the planes that form a cubical element of

infinitesimal dimensions In addition, body forces acting through the centroid of the soil element should be consid- ered A cubical element that is completely enclosed by imaginary, unbiased boundaries yields the conventional free body used for a stress equilibrium andysis (Fung, 1969; Biot, 1955; Hubbert and Rubey, 1959) Figure 3.2 shows

a cubical soil element with infinitesimal dimensions of dr,

dy, and dz in the Cartesian coordinate system The normal and shear stresses on each plane of the element are illus- trated in Fig 3.2 The body forces are not shown

N o d and Shear Stresses on a Soil Element Normal and shear stresses act on every plane in the x-, y-,

and z-directions The normal stress, u, has one subscript to denote the plane on which it acts Soils are most commonly subjected to compressive normal stresses In soil mechan- ics, a positive nonnal stress is used to indicate a compres- sion in the soil All the normal stresses shown in Fig 3.2 are positive or compressive Opposite directions would in- dicate negative normal stresses or tensions

The shear stress, 7 , has two subscripts The first sub- script denotes the plane on which the shear stress acts, and the second subscript refers to the direction of the shear stress As an example, the shear stress, 7R, acts on the y-plane and in the z-direction All of the shear stresses

7

There

shown in Fig 3.2 have positive signs Opposite directions where

would indicate negative shear stresses

Equating the summation of moments about the x-, y-,

and z-axes to zero results in the following shear stress re-

lationships:

TYz = Try (3.10)

The stress components can vary from plane to plane

across an element The spatial variation of a stress com-

ponent can be expressed as its derivative with respect to

space The stress variations in the x-, y-, and z-directions

are expressed as stress fields (Fig 3.2)

Equilibrium Equalions

The stress equilibrium conditions for an unsaturated soil

are presented in Appendix B A cubical element of an un-

saturated soil (Fig 3.2) is used in the equilibrium analysis

Newton’s second law is applied to the soil element by sum-

ming the forces in each direction (i.e., x-, y-, and

z-directions) An equilibrium condition for an unsaturated

soil element implies that the four phases (Le., air, water,

contractile skin, and soil particles) of the soil are in equi-

librium Each phase is assumed to behave as an indepen-

dent, linear, continuous, and coincident stress field in each

direction An independent equilibrium equation can be

written for each phase and superimposed using the princi-

ple of superposition However, this may not give rise to

equilibrium equations with stresses that can be measured

For example, the interpalticle stresses cannot be measured

directly Therefore, it is necessary to combine the indepen-

dent phases in such a way that measurable stresses appear

in the equilibrium equation for the soil structure (Le., the

arrangement of soil particles)

The force equilibrium equations for the air phase, the

water phase, and contractile skin, together with the total

equilibrium equation for the soil element are used in for-

mulating the equilibrium equation for the soil structure In

the y-direction, the equilibrium equation for the soil struc-

ture has the following form:

rXy = shear stress on the x-plane in the

uy = total normal stress in the ydirection (or

u, = pore-air pressure

f * = interaction function between the equi- librium of the soil structure and the equilibrium of the contractile skin

(ay - u,) = net normal stress in the ydirection

n, = porosity relative to the water phase

n, = porosity relative to the contractile skin

u, = pore-water pressure

r4 = shear stress on the z-plane in the

n, = porosity relative to the soil particles

F g = interaction force (Le., body force) be- tween the air phase and the soil particles

in the ydirection

Similar equilibrium equations can be written for the x-

and z-directions The stress variables that control the equi- librium of the soil structure [i.e., Eq (3.11)] also control

the equilibrium of the contractile skin through the interac- tion function, f *

3.2.2 Stress State Variables Three independent sets of normal stresses (Le., surface tractions) can be extracted from the equilibrium equation for the soil structure [Eq (3.11)] These are (by - uJ, (u, - u,), and (u,), which govern the equilibrium of the soil structure and the contractile skin The components of these variables are physically measurable quantities The stress variable, u,, can be eliminated when the soil parti- cles and the water are assumed to be incompressible The

((I - u,) and (u, - u,) are referred to as the stress state variables for an unsaturated soil More specifically, these are the surface tractions controlling the equilibrium of the soil structure and the contractile skin

Similar stress state variables can also be extracted from

the soil structure equilibrium equations for the x- and

zdirections The complete form of the stress state for an unsaturated soil can therefore be written as two indepen- dent stress tensors:

44 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

U )

Figure 3.3 The stress state variables for an unsaturated soil

and

(Ua - u w ) 1 (3.13) The above tensors cannot be combined into one matrix

since the stress variables have different soil properties (i.e.,

porosities) outside the partial differential terms [see Eq

(3.1 l)] The porosity terms are soil properties that should

not be included in the description of the stress state of a

soil Figure 3.3 illustrates the two independent tensors act-

ing at a point in an unsaturated soil

In the case of compressible soil particles or pore fluid,

an additional stress tensor, u,, must be used to describe the

Other Combinations of Stress State Variables

The equilibrium equation for the soil structure [i.e., Eq

(3.1 l)] can be formulated in a slightly different manner by using the pore-water pressure, u,, or the total normal stress, u, as a reference (see Appendix B) If the pore- water pressure, u,, is used as a reference, the following combination of stress state variables, (a - u,), (u, - u,),

and (uw), can be extracted from the equilibrium equations for the soil sttucture The stress variable, u,, is only of relevance for soils with compressible soil particles If the total normal stress, a, is used as a reference, the following combination of stress state variables, (a - u,), (a - u,),

and (a), can be extracted from the equilibrium equations for the soil structure The stress variable, u, can be ignonxl when the soil particles are assumed to be incompressible

In summary, there are three possible combinations of stress state variables that can be used to describe the stress

state relevant to the soil structure and contmtile skin in an

unsaturated soil These are tabulated in Table 3.1 The three combinations of stress state variables are obtained from equilibrium equations for the soil structure which are de- rived with respect to three different references (i.e., u,, u,,

and a) However, the (a - u,) and (u, - u,) combination appears to be the most satisfactory for use in engineering practice (Fredlund, 1979; Fmilund and Rahardjo, 1987) This combination is advantageous because the effects of a change in total normal stress can be separated from the ef- fects caused by a change in the pore-water pressure In addition, the pore-air pressure is atmospheric (i.e., zero gauge pressure) for most practical engineering problems

' Table 3.1 Possible Combinations of Stress

State Variables for an Unsaturated Soil

Reference Pressure Stress State Variables

Air, u, (u - u,) and (u, - u,)

Water, u, (0 - u 3 and (u, - u,)

Total, a (a - u,) and (a - u,)

Referencing the stress state to the pore-air pressure would

appear to produce the most reasonable and simple combi-

nation of stress state variables The (a - u,) and (u, - u,)

combination is used throughout this book, and these stress

variables are referred to as the net normal stress and the

matric suction, respectively

3.2.3 Saturated Soils as a Special Case of

Unsaturated Soils

A saturated soil can be viewed as a special case of an un-

saturated soil The four phases in an unsaturated soil re-

duce to two phases for a saturated soil (Le., soil particles

and water) The phase equilibrium equations for a saturated

soil can be derived using the same theory used for unsat-

urated soils (Appendix B) There is also a smooth transition

between the stress state for a saturated soil and that of an

unsaturated soil

As an unsaturated soil approaches saturation, the degree

of saturation, S, approaches 100% The pore-water pres-

sure, u,, appmaches the pore-air pressure, u,, and the ma-

tric suction term, (u, - u,), goes towards zero Only the

first stress tensor is retained for a saturated soil when con-

sidering this special case:

7xy b y - u 3 7vr Tu, 1 (3.15)

The second stress tensors [Le., Eq (3.13)] disappears

because the matric suction, (u, - u,), goes towards zero

The pore-air pressure term in the first stress tensor [Le.,

Eq (3.12)] becomes the pore-water pressure, u,, in the

stress tensor for a saturated soil [Le., Eq (3.15)] The

stress state variables for saturated soils are shown diagram-

matically in Fig 3.5 The above rationale demonstrates the

smooth transition in stress state description when going

from an unsaturated soil to a saturated soil, and vice versa

The stress tensor for a saturated soil indicates that the

difference between the total stress and the pore-water pres-

sure forms a stress state variable that can be used to de-

scribe the equilibrium This stress state variable, (a - u,),

is commonly r e f e d to as effective stress (Terzaghi,

1936) The so-called effective stress law is essentially a

stress state variable which is requid to describe the me-

( a x - u w ) 7yx

[ 7xr 7yz (a, - u 3

(a, - u,)

Figure 3.5 The stress state variables for a saturated soil

chanical behavior of a saturated soil For the case of com- pressible soil particles, an additional stress tensor (i.e , u,)

should be used toedescribe the complete stress state for a saturated soil (Skempton, l%l)

3.2.4 Dry Soh

Evaporation from a soil or airdrying a soil will bring the

soil to a dry condition As the soil dries, the matric suction

increases Numerous experiments have shown that the ma-

tric suction tends to a common limiting value in the range

of 620-980 MPa as the water content appmaches 0%

(Fredlund, 1964) The relationship between the water con- tent and the suction of a soil is commonly referred to as the soil-water characteristic curve Figure 3.6 presents the soil-water characteristic curve for Regina clay The gra-

46 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

1 Dune sand

2 Loamy sand

3 Calcareous fine sandy loam

4 Calcareous loam

5 Silt loam derived from loess

6 Young oligotrophous peat soil 0.6 -

10-1 i i o 102 103 io4 10' io6

Matric suction, (u - u,) (kPa)

Figure 3.7 Soil-water characteristic cuwe for some Dutch soils

(from Koorevaar et al., 1983)

vimetric water content, expressed in terms of (wG,), is

plotted against matric suction The void ratio, e, is also

plotted against matric suction The plot shows a decreasing

void ratio and water content as the matric suction in-

creases Further results are shown in Fig 3.7 where the

volumetric water content, e,, is plotted versus matric suc-

tion for various soils The suction approaches a value of

approximately 980 MPa (Le., 9.8 X Id kPa) at 0% watu

content, as shown in both figures The above plots illus-

trate the continuous nature of the water content versus suc-

tion relationship In other words, there does not appear to

be any discontinuity in this relationship as the soil desatur-

ates In addition, the void ratio approaches the void ratio

at the shrinkage limit of the soil as the water content ap-

proaches 0%, as shown in Fig 3.8 Even for a sandy soil,

0.8 l b+-

- UA

't

Figure 3.9 The stress state variables for a dry soil

the soil suction continues to increase with drying to 0% water content

The effects of a change in matric suction on the mechan- ical behavior of a soil may become negligible as the soil approaches a completely dry condition In other words, a change in matric suction on a dry soil may not produce any significant change in the volume or shear strength of the soil For these dry soils, the net normal stress, (u - u,),

may become the only stress state variable controlling their behavior

The effect of a matric suction change on the volume change of Regina clay is demonstrated in Fig 3.8 As the

matric suction of the soil is increased, the water content is reduced and the volume of the soil decreases However, prior to the soil becoming completely dry, the volume of the soil remains essentially constant regardless of the in- crease in matric suction

As a soil becomes extremely dry, a matric suction change may no longer produce any significant changes in mechan- ical properties Although matric suction remains a stress state variable, it may not be required in describing the be- havior of the soil Only the first stress tensor with (a - u,)

may be required for describing the volume decrease of a dry soil (Fig 3.9):

1

On the other hand, it may be necessary to consider matric suction as a stress state variable when examining the vol- ume increase or swelling of a dry soil

There is a hierarchy with respect to the magnitude of the individual stress components in an unsaturated soil:

(3.17)

u > u, > u,

The hierarchy in Eiq (3.17) must be maintained in order

to ensure stable equilibrium conditions Limiting stress

state conditions occur when one of the stress state variables

becomes zero For example, if the pore-air pressure, u,, is

momentarily increased in excess of the total stress, u, an

“explosion” of the sample may occur In other words, once

the (u - u,) variable goes to zero, a limiting stress state

condition is reached This limiting stress condition is uti-

lized in the pressure plate test [Fig 3.10(a)] Let us sup-

pose that an external air pressure greater than the pre-

water pressure is applied to an unsaturated soil The sample

could be visualized as being surrounded with a rubber

membrane which is subjected to a total stress equal to the

external air pressure The pore-air pressure is also equal to

the external air pressure In this case, the difference be-

tween the total stress, (I, and the pore-air pressure, u,, is

zero and the stress state variable (u - u,) ’vanishes The

stress state variable, (u, - u,), can be used to describe the

behavior of the unsaturated soil under this limiting condi-

tion

Another limiting stress state condition occurs when ma-

tric suction, (u, - u,), vanishes If the pore-water pres-

sure is increased in excess of the pore-air pressure, the

degree of saturation of the soil approaches 100% The

backpressure oedometer test [Fig 3.10(b)] is an example

involving the limiting condition where matric suction van-

ishes As the backpressure is applied to the water phase of

an initially unsaturated soil, the degw of saturation ap-

proaches 100% The pore-water pressure approaches the

pore-air pressure and the matric suction goes to zero The

behavior of the soil can now be described in terms of one

stress state variable [Le., (a - u,)] A smooth transition

from the unsaturated case to the saturated case takes place

under the limiting stress state condition of pore-air pres-

sure being equal to pore-water pressure

A limiting condition occufs in saturated soils when the

stress state variable (a - u,) (i.e., the effective stress)

reaches zero At this point, the saturated soil becomes un-

Total stress = 500 kPa (External air pressure)

The validity of the theoretical stress state variables should

be experimentally tested A suggested criterion was pro-

posed by Fredlund and Morgenstern (1977):

“A suitable set of independent stress state variables are those that produce no distortion or volume change of an element when the individual components of the stress state variables are mod- ified but the stress state variables themselves are kept constant Thus the stress state variables for each phase should produce

equilibrium in that phase when a stress point in space is con- sidel.ed ”

The experiments used by Fredlund and Morgenstern (1977) to test the stress state variables are called “null” tests The working principle for the “null” tests is based upon the above criterion for testing stress state variables The “null” tests consider the overall and water volume change (or equilibrium conditions) of an unsaturated soil

An axis-translation technique (Hilf, 1956) was used in test- ing the unsaturated soil Similar null-type tests related to the shear strength of an unsaturated silt were performed by Bishop and Donald (l%l)

3.4.1 The Concept of Axis Translation

Difficulties arise in testing unsaturated soils with negative pore-water pressures approaching -1 a m (Le., zero ab- solute pressure) Water in the measuring system may start

to cavitate when the water pressure approaches -1 atm (i.e., - 101.3 kPa gauge) As cavitation occurs, the mea-

suring system becomes filled with air Then, water from the measuring system is forced into the soil

The axis-translation technique is commonly used in the laboratory testing of unsaturated soils in order to prevent

Total stress = 500 kPa

U i: 200 kPa

u = 200 kPe

Soil specimen

u - uv = 500 - 200 = 300 kPa u.-uv = 200 - 200 = 0 kPa

(b)

u - U, = 500 - 200 = 300 kP8 Figure 3.10 Tests performed at limiting stress state conditions (a) Pressure plate test; (b) back- pressure oedometer test

48 3 STRESSSTATEVARIABLES

having to measure pore-water pressures less than zero ab-

solute The procedure involves a translation of the refer-

ence or pore-air pressure The pore-water pressure can then

be referenced to a positive air pressure (Hilf, 1956) Figure

3.11 presents results from null-type, pressure plate tests

which demonstrate the use of the axis-translation technique

in the measurement of matric suctions This measuring

technique is described in detail in Chapter 4 Unsaturated

soil specimens were subjected to various external air pres-

sures The pore-air pressure, u,, becomes equal to the ex-

ternally applied air pressure As a result, the pore-water

pressure, u,, undergoes the same pmssure change as the

change in the applied air pressure In this way, the matric

suction of the soil remains constant regardless of the trans-

lation of both the pore-air and pore-water pressures

Therefore, the pore-water pressure can be raised to a pos-

itive value that can be measured without cavitation occur-

ring The axis-translation technique has been successfully

applied by numerous researchers to the volume change and

shear strength testing of unsaturated soils (Bishop and Don-

ald, 1961; Gibbs and Coffey, 1969b; Fredlund, 1973; Ho

and Fredlund, 1982a; Gan et al 1988)

The use of the axis-translation technique requires the

control of the pore-air pressure and the control or mea-

surement of the pore-water pressure In a triaxial cell, the

pore-air pressure is usually controlled through a coarse co-

rundum disk placed on top of the soil sample The pore-

water pressure is controlled through a saturated high air

entry ceramic disk sealed to the pedestal of the triaxial cell

The high air entry disk is a porous, ceramic disk which

allows the passage of water, but prevents the flow of free

air Continuity between the water in the soil and the water

in the ceramic disk is necessary in order to correctly estab-

lish the matric suction The matric suction in the soil spec-

imen must not exceed the air entry value of the ceramic

disk Air entry values for the ceramic disks generally range

from about 50.5 kPa (1 bar) up to 1515 kPa (15 bars)

translation technique (from Hilf, 1956)

3.4.2 Null Tests to Test Stress State Variables

Null-type test data to “test” the stress state variables for unsaturated soils were published by Fredlund and Morgen- stem in 1977 The components (Le., a, u,, and u,) of the proposed stress state variables were varied equally in order

to maintain constant values for the stress state variables [i.e., (a - u,), (u, - u,), and ((I - u,)] In other words, the components of the stress state variables were increased

or decreased by an equal amount while volume changes were monitored:

Aa, = Aay = Aaz = Au, = Au, (3.18)

If the proposed stress state variables are valid, there should not be any change in the overall volume of the soil sample, and the degree of saturation of the soil should re- main constant throughout the “null” test In other words, positive results from the “null” test should show zero overall and water volume changes

It is difficult to measure zero volume change over an ex- tended period of testing Slight volume changes may still occur due to one or more of the following reasons: 1) an

imperfect testing procedure, 2) air diffusion through the

high air entry disk, 3) water loss from the soil specimen

through evaporation or diffusion, and 4) secondary consol-

idation

A total of 19 “null” tests were performed on compacted kaolin The soil was compacted according to the standard AASHTO procedure Two types of equipment were used

in performing the “null” tests For the first apparatus, one- dimensional loading was applied using an enclosed, mod- ified oedometer The second apparatus involved isotropic loading using a modified triaxial cell The axis-translation technique was used in both cases

The pressure changes associated with the “null” tests on unsaturated soil samples are summarized in Table 3.2 The individual stress variables were varied in accordance with

Eq (3.18), while the stress state variables were kept con- stant The measured volume changes of the overall sample and water inflow or outflow are given in Table 3.3 The results from one test are presented in Fig 3.12 The results show essentially no volume change in the overall specimen and little water flow during the “null” tests The stress state variables are therefore “tested” in the sense that they define equilibrium conditions for the unsaturated soil In turn, the stress state variables are qualified for describing the mechanical behavior of unsaturated soils

3.4.3 Other Experimental Evidence in Support of the Proposed Stress State Variables

Other data have been presented in the research literature which lend support to the use of the proposed stress state variables Bishop and Donald (1961) performed a triaxial strength test on an unsaturated Braehead silt The total (i.e.,

confining) pressure, a,, the pore-air pressure, and the pore-

Table 3.2 Pressure Changes for Null Tests on Unsaturated Soils (From Fredlund,

41 1.4

479.5 549.0 272.8 410.9 480.4 547.5 615.4 549.4 479.2 412.6

278.7 270.9

406.8

613.2 138.3 394.6 202.2 270.5 338.3 406.3 476.4 202.2 338.5 407.8 473.7 541.2 477.1 407.6 340.7

109.6 3.0 143.5 498.3 100.3 32.3 22.4 91.2

160.2

227.5 297.2 73.1 208.3 278.0 343.9

41 1.3 347.6 277.8 211.4

+71.4

+ 135.9 +68.6 -204.3 +68.8

+ 136.6 +68.5 +68.8 +68.1 +69.5 +69.0 +66.9 +69.5 +67.1 +67.9 -66.0 -70.2 -66.6 -140.5

+70.3

+ 135.9 +68.3 -204.3 +68.5

+ 137.4 +68.3 +68.5 +68.0 +70.1 +68.0 +65.9 +69.3 +65.9 +67.5 -64.1 -69.5 -66.9

- 140.3

+70.7 +140.5 +66.9 -204.9 +80.8

+ 137.9 +68.8 +68.8 +67.3 +69.7 +68.4 +66.1 +69.7 +65.9 +67.4 -63.7 -69.8 -66.4

- 139.8

water pressure were vaned by equal amounts in order to

keep (u3 - u,) and (u, - u,) constant The pressure

changes for individual stress components are given in Ta-

ble 3.4 The values of (u3 - u,) and (u, - u,) throughout

the test are given in Table 3.5 (Le., Combination 1) If (us

- u,) and (u, - u,) are valid stress state variables, it would

be anticipated that the pressure variations should not pro-

duce any significant change in the shear strength of the soil

In other words, the stress versus strain curve of the soil

should remain monotonic The test results are plotted in

Fig 3.13 The results show that the stress versus strain

relationship remains monotonic, substantiating the use of

(u - u,) and (u, - u,) as valid stress state variables As

the matric suction variable was changed, towards the end

of the test (i.e., portion 5), the behavior of the stress versus

strain relationship was altered, Other small fluctuations in

the stress versus strain curve were not believed to be of

consequence Bishop and Donald (1961) stated that:

“The small temporary fluctuations in the stress strain curve are

probably the result of a variation in rate of strain due to the

change in end thrust on the loading ram as the cell pressure is

changed ”

Other combinations of stress components are equally jus-

tified, as shown in Table 3.5

3.5 STRESS ANALYSIS

The proposed and tested stress state variables for unsatu- rated soils can be used in engineering practice in a manner similar to which the effective stress variable is used for

saturated soils In situ profiles can be drawn for each of the stress components Their variation with depth and time is required for analyzing shear strength or volume change problems (i.e., slope instability and heave) Factors af- fecting the in situ stress profiles are described in order to better understand possible profile variations that may be observed in practice

Most geotechnical engineering problems can be simpli- fied from their three-dimensional form to either a two- or onedimensional problem This also applies for unsaturated soils, but the presentation of the stress state must be ex- tended, An extended form of the Mohr diagram can be used

to illustrate the role of matric suction The extended Mohr diagram also helps illustrate the smooth transition to the conventional saturated soil case The concepts of stmss in- variants, stress points, and stress paths are also applicable

to unsaturated soil mechanics

3.5.1 In situ Stress State Component Profiles

The magnitude and distribution of the stress components

in the field are required prior to performing most geotech-

50 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

N-23 N-24 N-25 N-26 N-27 N-28 N-29 N-30 N-3 1 N-32 N-33 N-34 N-35 N-36 N-37 N-38 N-39 N-40 N-41

0.0

+ O M

+0.01

-0.25 0.0 -0.15

0.0 -0.015 -0.010 -0.007 -0.030

-0.03 +0.4 0.0 -0.20 -0.10 -0.15 +0.012 +0.012 +0.12

+O 17 +O 15

+0.060

+0.033 -0.020 -0.005 + o m 2

+0.005

-0.005 +0.007

-0.05

-0.07 -0.02

-0.50

-0.11 -0.642 -0.072 -0.060 -0.045 -0.020 -0.105 -0.060 -0.035

-0.050

+0.010

-0.005

+0.015 -0.040

Table 3.4 Pressure Changes in Bishop and Donald’s (1961) Triaxial Strength Test Experiment on Braehead Silt

Portion of Confining Stress-Strain Pressure, Curve’ a3 (Wa)

Pore-Air Pore-Water Pressure Pressure, pressure, Change

‘Poxtions 1,2,3, and 4 produced monotonic behavior with constant stress

state variables, while matric suction was varied in portion 5

Table 3.5 Independent Stress State Variables Showing Monotonic Behavior (From Bishop and Donaid’s Data, 1961)

‘Portions 1, 2, 3, and 4 produced monotonic behavior

nical analyses The distribution of the stress components

allows the computation of in situ profiles for the net normal

stress, (a - u,), and matric suction, (u, - u,) As the soil

becomes saturated, the two profiles revert to the classic ef-

fective stress, (u - u,), profile The present in situ profiles

are generally based on field and/or laboratory measure-

ments, while the final profiles are assumed or computed

based on theoretical considerations

The total normal stress in a soil is a function of the den-

sity or the total unit weight of the soil The magnitude and

distribution of the total normal stress is also affected by the

application of external loads such as buildings or the re-

moval of soil through excavation

Let us consider a geostatic condition where the ground

surface is horizontal and the vertical and horizontal planes

do not have shear stress (Lambe and Whitman, 1979) The

net normal stresses in the vertical and horizontal directions

are related to the density of soil The net normal stress in

the vertical direction is called the overburden pressure, and can be computed as follows (see Fig 3.14):

LI (uu - ua) = 1 p(z) g - ua (3.19)

0

where

(a, - u,) = vertical net normal stress

u, = pore-air pressure

z1 = ground surface elevation

z2 = elevation under consideration

g = gravitational acceleration

p(z) = density of the soil as a function of depth

The vertical net normal stress distribution with respect

to depth will be a straight line for the case where the den- sity is constant The pore-air pressure is genetally assumed

to be in equilibrium with atmospheric pressure (i.e., zero

52 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

Figure 3.13 Drained test on an unsaturated loose silt in which

03, u., and u, were varied, while keeping (u3-u,) and (u,-u,) con-

stant (a) Pressure changes versus strain; @) deviator stress versus

strain (from Bishop and Donald, 1961)

gauge pressure) Fig 3.14(a) shows a typical profile of the

vertical net normal stress for geostatic conditions When soil strata with distinctly different densities are encoun- tered, the integration of Eq (3.19) should be performed for each layer In this case, the vertical net normal stress profile will not be a straight line

Coemient of Luted Earth Pressure

The coefficient of lateral earth pressure, K, can be defined

as the ratio of horizontal net normal stress to vertical net normal stress This is a slight variation from saturated soil mechanics where horizontal and vertical stresses are not referenced to the pore-air pressure

(uh - u,) = horizontal net normal stress

For geostatic stress conditions where there is no horizon- tal strain, K is defined as the coefficient of lateral earth

pressure ut rest, KO (Tenaghi, 1925) The coefficient of lateral earth pressure ut rest depends on several factors, such as the type of soil, its stress history, and density (see Chapter 11) Saturated soils commonly have KO values

ranging from as low as 0.4 to values in excess of I O Un- saturated soils are commonly overconsolidated, and can have coefficients of earth pressure af rest greater than 1 O

(Bmoker and Ireland, 1965) On the other hand, the coef- ficients can go to zero for the case where the soil becomes

desiccated and cracked A profile of the horizontal net nor-

mal stress at rest condition is shown in Fig 3.14(b)

The effect of external loads and excavations on the net

normal stress is presented in Chapter 11 The theory of elasticity, commonly used to compute the change in total stress, applies similarly for saturated and unsaturated soils

Figure 3.14 In situ net normal stress pmfile under geostatic conditions (a) Vertical net normal

stress; @) horizontal net normal stress

5 !

Matric Suction A.ofue

Matric suction is closely related to the surrounding envi-

ronment and is of interest in analyzing geotechnical engi-

neering problems The in situ profile of pore-water pres-

sures (and thus matric suction) may vary from time to time,

as illustrated in Fig 3.15 The variation in the soil suction

profile is generally greater than variations commonly oc-

curring in the net normal stress profile Variations in the

suction profile depend upon several factors, as illustrated

by Blight (1980)

Ground surface condition The matric suction profile

below an uncovered ground surface is affected significantly

by environmental changes, as shown in Fig 3.16 Dry and

wet seasons cause variations in the suction profile, partic-

ularly close to the ground surface The suction profile be-

neath a covered ground surface is more constant with re-

spect to time than is a profile below an uncovered surface

For example, the suction profile below a house or a pave-

ment is less influenced by seasonal variations than the suc-

tion profile below an open field However, moisture may

slowly accumulate below the covered m a on a long-term

basis, causing a reduction in the soil suction Figure 3.17

shows several matric suction profiles below a slope in Hong

Kong The sloping portion of the slope is covered by a

layer of soil cement and lime plaster (Le., locally referred

to as Chunam) to prevent water infiltration into the slope

The top portion of the slope was exposed to the environ-

ment In this particular case, the soil suction profile re-

mains relatively constant throughout dry and wet (i.e.,

rainy) seasons

Environmental conditions The matric suction in the

soil increases during dry seasons and decreases during wet

seasons Maximum changes in suction occur near ground

surface During a dry season, the evaporation rate is high,

and it results in a net loss of water from the soil The op-

posite condition may occur during a wet season

-I

6 ; 8 h

Excessive evaporation

/ Eauilibriurn Ground / ,- wi$ewater

clrrfara

Negative y\ f\/ /'

pore - wateh \ I

At time of deposit ion Flooding '\

desiccate

soil

~ Water table .'\jk

Positive pore - water pressure

Figure 3.15 Typical pore-water pressure profiles

Vegetation Vegetation on the ground surface has the

ability to apply a tension to the pore-water of up to 1-2

MPa through the evapotranspiration process Evapotran- spiration results in the removal of water from the soil and

an increase in the matric suction The rate of evapotran-

54 3 STRESS STATE VARLABLES

Overburden pressure Horizontal stress

at restKot0.5

by applied loads

-Pore

Osmotic suction,rr Total suction.$

Figure 3.17 In situ suction profiles in a steep slope in Hong

Kong (from Sweeney, 1982)

spiration is a function of the micmlimate, the type of veg-

etation, and the depth of the root zone

Water table The depth of the water table influences

the magnitude of the matric suction The deeper the water

table, the higher the possible matric suction The effect of

the water table on the matric suction becomes particularly

significant near ground surface (Blight, 1980)

Permeability of the soil profile The permeability of a

soil represents its ability to transmit and drain water This,

in turn, indicates the ability of the soil to change matric

suction as a result of environmental changes The perme-

Due to normal

, stress

Inducec externs Suction measuring devices and their I h i t of measurements

ability of an unsaturated soil varies widely with its degree

of saturation The permeability also depends on the type of soil Different soil strata which have varying abilities to transmit water in turn affect the in situ matric suction pro- file The relative effects of the environment, the water ta- ble, and the vegetation on the matric suction profiles are illustrated in Fig 3.16

Matric suction is a hydrostatic or isotropic pressure in that it has equal magnitude in all directions The magnitude

of the matric suction is often considerably higher than the magnitude of the net normal stmss Typical relative mag- nitudes between net normal stress and matric suction are

shown in Fig 3.18 This figure illustrates the importance

of knowing the magnitude of the soil suction when study- ing the behavior of unsaturated soils

3.5.2 Extended Mohr Diagram

The state of stress at a point in the soil is three-dimen- sional, but the concepts involved are more easily repre- sented in a two-dimensional form In two dimensions, there always exists a set of two mutually orthogonal principal planes with real-valued principal stresses The principal planes are the planes on which there are no shear stresses The direction of the principal planes depends on the gen- eral stress state at a point The largest principal stress is called the major principal stress, and is given the symbol,

ut The smallest principal stress is called the minor prin- cipal stress, and is given the symbol, u3 In the case of a horizontal ground surface, the horizontal and vertical planes are the principal planes The vertical net noma1 stress is

generally the net major principal stress, (al - ua), and the horizontal net normal stress is the net minor principal stress,

(03 - 43

If the magnitude and the direction of the stresses acting

on any two mutually orthogonal planes (e.g., the principal planes) are known, the stress condition on any inclined

plane can be determined In other words, the net normal

stress and shear stress on any inclined plane can be com-

puted from the known net principal stresses The matric

suction, (u, - u,,,), on every inclined plane at a point is

constant since it is an isotropic tensor Therefore, only the

net normal stress and shear stress on an inclined plane need

to be considered

Equation of Mohr Circles

Consider an unsaturated soil ar rest with a horizontal

ground surface The net normal stress and shear stress on

a plane with an inclination angle, a, from the horizontal

are illustrated in Fig 3.19 The inclined plane has an in-

finitesimal length, ds, and results in a triangular free body

element with horizontal and vertical planes The horizontal

plane has an infinitesimal length of dx Its length can be

written in terms of the sloping length, ds, and the angle,

dx = ds cos a (3.21)

a:

The vertical plane has an infinitesimal length of dy:

dy = ds sin a (3.22)

All the planes have a unit thickness in the perpendicular

direction The equilibrium of the triangular element re-

quires that the summation of forces in the horizontal and

vertical dimtions be equal to zero Summing forces hori-

zontally gives

- (a, - u,) ds sin a + 7, ds cos a

+ (u3 - u,) dy = 0 (3.23)

Summing forces vertically gives

- (a, - u,) ds cos a - T, ds sin a

+ (u, - u,) dx = 0 (3.24)

Substituting dx and dy [Le., Eqs (3.21) and (3.22)] into

Eqs (3.24) and (3.23), respectively, and multiplying Eq

- x

Figure 3.19 Net normal and shear stresses on an inclined plane

at a point in the soil mass below a horizontal ground surface

(3.23) by sin a and Eq (3.24) by cos a, gives

- (a, - UJ ab sin' a + T, c l ~ sin a cos a

+ (u3 - u,) ds sin' a = o (3.25)

and

- (u, - u,) ds cos' a - T, ds sin (11 cos a

+ (01 - u,) dr cosz a = 0 (3.26)

Summing Eqs (3.25) and (3.26) gives

- (0, - u,) cis (sin' a + cos' a)

+ (u3 - u,) tis sin' a + (al - u,) ds cos' a = 0

+ (y) cos 2a (3.29)

The shear stress, T,, is obtained by substituting dx and

dy [i.e., Eqs (3.21) and (3.22)] into Eq (3.24) and (3.23),

respectively, and multiplying Eq, (3.23) by cos a and Eq (3.24) by sin a:

- (a, - UJ sin a cos a + T, d~ cos' a

+ (u3 - u,) ds sin a cos a = 0 (3.30)

- (a, - u,) ds sin a cos a - 7, dr sin' a

+ (a, - u,) ds sin a cos a = 0 (3.31) Subtracting Eq (3.31) from Eq (3.30) gives

7, ds (sin' a + cos' a) + (u3 - u,) ab sin a cos a

- (u, - u,) ds sin a cos a = 0 (3.32)

Using trigonometric relations, it is possible to solve for

7, :

Equations (3.29) and (3.33) give the net normal stress and the shear stress on an inclined plane through a point The term (a, - u3) is called the deviator stress, and is an indication of the shear stress For a given stress state, the largest shear stress, [(a, - u3)/2], occurs on a plane with

56 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

an inclination angle, a, such that (sin 2a) will be equal to

unity

The net normal stress and shear stress at a point can also

be determined using a graphical method If Eqs (3.29) and

(3.33) are squared and added, the result is the equation of

a circle:

(3.34)

The circle is known as the Mohr diagram, and represents

the stress state at a point In saturated soils, the Mohr dia-

gram is often plotted with the principal effective normal

stress as the abscissa and the shear stress as the ordinate

For unsaturated soils, an extended form of the Mohr dia-

gram can be used as shown in Fig 3.20 The extended

Mohr diagram uses a third orthogonal axis to represent ma-

tric suction The circle described in Eq (3.34) is drawn on

a plane with the net noma1 stress, (a - u,), as the abscissa

and the shear stress, 7 , as the ordinate The center of the

circle has an abscissa of [(al + a3)/2 - u,] and a radius

The matric suction must also be included as part of the

description of the stress state The matric suction deter-

mines the position of the Mohr diagram along the third axis

As the soil becomes saturated, the matric suction goes to

zero, and the Mohr diagram moves to a single [(a - u,,,)

versus 71 plane

Construction of Mohr Circles

The construction of the Mohr diagram on the [(a - u,)

versus 71 plane is shown in Fig 3.21 A compressive net

only be used for plotting the Mohr diagram The major and minor net principal stresses [(al - u,) and (a3 - u,)] are plotted on the abscissa, and the center of the Mohr circle

is located at [(al + a3)/2 - u,] The radius of the circle

is [(al - a3)/2] The Mohr circle represents the net normal

stress and shear stress on any plane through a point in an unsaturated soil

The net normal stress and shear stress on any plane can

be determined if the pole point or the origin of planes is known Any plane drawn through the pole point will inter- sect the Mohr diagram and give the net normal stress and shear stress acting on that plane On the other hand, if the net normal stress and shear stress on a plane are known and plotted as a stress point on the Mohr circle, the direction

of the plane under consideration is given by the orientation

of a line joining the stms point and the pole point

The pole point for the condition shown in Fig 3.21 is

determined from the known net normal stress and shear stress on a particular plane Consider, for example, the case where the major principal stress acts on a horizontal plane The stress condition on the horizontal plane is repmsented

by the stress point (a, - u,) on the Mohr circle If a hor- izontal line is drawn through the stress point (al - u,), the line will intersect the Mohr circle at the stress point

(a3 -u,) This is the pole point The net normal stress and

Figure 3.20 Extended Mohr diagram for unsaturated soils

shear stress on the inclined plane shown in Fig 3.21 can

then be determined using the same pole point A line at an

orientation, a, can be drawn through the pole point to in-

tersect the Mohr circle at the stress point [(a, - u,), T,]

The horizontal coordinate of the intersection point is the

net normal stress, (a, - u,), acting on the inclined plane

(Fig 3.21) The shear stress, T,, on the plane is positive

and is given by the ordinate of the intersection point

The plane with the maximum shear stress, [ + (a, -

u3)/2], goes through the top point of the Mohr circle (i.e.,

stress point T in Fig 3.21) The maximum negative shear

stress, [- (u, - a3)/2], occurs at the bottom point, T',

on the Mohr circle The planes with the maximum positive

and negative shear stresses are oriented at an angle of 45"

from the principal planes or from the horizontal and verti-

cal planes in this case

The principal planes are not always the vertical and hor-

izontal planes A more general caseis shown in Pig 3.22

where shear stresses may be present on the vertical and

horizontal planes The principal stresses and principal

planes can be found graphically using the known stresses

on the vertical and horizontal planes The vertical net nor-

mal stress, (ay - u,), is a compressive stress, and the hor-

izontal net normal stress, (a, - u,), is negative because it

is in tension The matric suction, (u, - uw), acts on every

plane with equal magnitude The shear stresses, 7xy and T ~ ~ ,

are always equal in magnitude and opposite in sign

The extended Mohr circle for the stress state shown in

Fig 3.22 is presented in Fig 3.23 The Mohr circle is

drawn on the ET and (a - u.)] plane Its position along the

(u, - uw) axis is determined by the magnitude of the matric

suction The first step in plotting the Mohr diagram is to

plot the stress points which represent the stresses corn-

sponding to the vertical and horizontal planes (Le., [(ax -

u,), T ~ ] and [(a, - u,), T ~ J , respectively) A line joining

the two stress points intersects the (a - u,) axis at a point

[(ux + ay)/2 - u J The intersection point is the center for

the Mohr circle The Mohr circle can then be drawn with

the two stress points forming the diameter of the circle

The intersection points between the Mohr circle and the

(a - u,) axis (i.e., where the shear stress is zero) are the, net major and net minor principal stresses [i.e., (a, - u,)

and (a3 - u,)] (Fig 3.23) The net minor principal stress

is negative, which indicates that it is in tension

The second step is to locate the pole point by drawing a horizontal plane through the stress point, [(ay - u,), ~ ~ ~ 1

The intersection of the horizontal line and the Mohr circle

is the pole point The pole point can also be obtained by

drawing a vertical line from the stress point conesponding

- "'1

-x

Figure 3.22 General stress state at a point in an unsaturated soil

58 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

u / + Net normal stress, (a - UJ

Figure 3.23 Extended Mohr diagram showing the general stress state for an unsaturated soil element

to the vertical plane (i.e., [(ux - ua), 7J) A line joining

the pole point and the net major or net minor principal stress

point gives the orientation of the major or minor principal

plane (Fig 3.23) The major and minor principal planes

are at an angle of a and /3 with respect to the horizontal,

respectively

The top and the bottom stress points on the Mohr circle

correspond to the planes on which the maximum and min-

imum shear stresses occur The maximum and minimum

shear stress planes are oriented at an angle of 45" from the

principal planes (Fig 3.23)

3.5.3 Stress Invariants

For a three-dimensional analysis, there are three principal

stresses on three mutually orthogonal principal planes The

three principal stresses are named according to their mag-

nitudes These are the net major, net intermediate, and net

minor principal stresses The symbols used for the net ma-

jor, net intermediate, and net minor principal stresses are

(0, - u,), (a2 - ua), and (u3 - u,), respectively A cor-

responding Mohr circle is shown in Fig 3.24 The matric

suction acts equally on all three principal planes

The principal stresses at a point can be visualized as the

characterization of the physical state of stress These prin-

cipal stresses are independent of the selected coordinate

system The independent properties of principal stresses are

expressed in terms of constants called stress invariants

There are three stress invariants that can be derived from

each of the two independent stress tensors for an unsatu- rated soil [refer to stress tensors (3.12) and (3.13)] The first stress invariants of the first and second stress tensors, respectively, are

111 = ut + 0 2 + a3 - 324, (3.35)

and

112 = 304, - u d (3.36)

where

I , , = first stress invariant of the first tensor

ZI2 = first stress invariant of the second tensor

The second stress invariants of the first and second stress tensors, respectively, are

121 = (a1 - 47)(@2 - u,) + (02 - %)(a3 - ua)

+ (03 - W U 1 - u,) (3.37)

and

122 = 3(u, - uwy (3.38)

where

I,, = second stress invariant of the first tensor

122 = second stress invariant of the second tensor The third stress invariants of the first and second stress tensors, respectively, are

131 = (01 - ua)(02 - - ua) (3.39)

I,, = third stress invariant of the first tensor

I32 = third stress invariant of the second tensor

The stress invariants of the second tensor, II2, Iz2, and

132 = (112/3)~ = 112122P (3.41)

Therefore, only one stress invariant is requiml to rep-

resent the second tensor In other words, a total of four

stress invariants are required to characterize the stress state

of an unsaturated soil as opposed to three stress invariants

for a saturated soil

3.5.4 stress Points

Geotechnical analyses often require an understanding of the

development or change in the stress state resulting from

various loading patterns These changes could be visual-

ized by drawing a series of Mohr circles which follow the

loading process However, the pattern of the stress state

change may become confusing when the loading pattern is

complex Therefore, it is better to use only one stress point

on a Mohr circle to represent the stress state in the soil A

selected stress point can be used to define the stress path

followed

Figure 3.25 shows a Mohr circle for a two-dimensional

case where the vertical and horizontal planes are principal

planes The stress point selected to represent the Mohr cir-

cle has the coordinates of (p, q, r), where

132, are related as follows:

p = ( y - u,) or (y - u,) (3.42)

r = (u, - u,)

(3.43) (3 .w

and

(a, - u,) = vertical net normal stress

(u, - u,) = matric suction

The q-coordinate is one half the deviator stress (a, - ah)

The selected stress point represents the state of stress on a plane with an orientation of 45" from the principal planes,

to (a, - 4)], the q-cwrdinate is equal to zero A zero

q-coordinate means the absence of shear stresses

(Uh U,) = horizontal net l l o d SmSS

3.5.5 Stress Paths

A change in the stress state of a soil can be described using

stress paths A stress path is a curve drawn through the stress points for successive stress states (Lambe, 1967) As

an example, consider a soil element where the initial con- dition has (a,, - u,), equal to (a, - u,) at a particular matric suction value This stress state is represented by point 0 in Fig 3.26 The soil is then subjected to an increase in the

vertical net normal stress, A(a, - u,), while maintaining

(a,, - u,) and (u, - u,) constant As the vertical net nor-

mal stress is i n c W , the Mohr circle expands, as illus- trated in Fig 3.26 The stress point moves from point 0 to

60 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

Net normal stress, (a - u.)

Figure 3.25 Representative stress point for an extended Mohr circle

points 1, 2, 3, 4, etc These stress points represent a con-

tinuous series of Mohr circles or stress states The stress

path for this loading condition is shown in Fig 3.27 The

stress points are plotted on the p-q-r diagram where p is

the abscissa, q is the ordinate axis, and r is the third or-

thogonal axis The coordinates of the stress points, (p, q,

r), are computed using Eqs (3.42), (3.43), and (3.44)

The p-, q-, r-coordinates represent the net normal stress,

the shear stress, and the matric suction at each stage of

loading The stress path is established by joining the stress

points The stress path can be linear or curved, depending

on the loading pattern

The stress path shown in Fig 3.27 illustrates a loading

condition where the matric suction is maintained constant Similar loading conditions can also be performed at other matric suction values The stress paths are plotted on dif- ferent planes, depending upon the matric suction value or the r-coordinate, as demonstrated in Fig 3.28

Figure 3.29 presents the stress paths for various loading

patterns while maintaining a constant matric suction The initial stress condition in the soil has (uh - u,) equal to

(0; - u,) The magnitude and direction of the net normal stress changes determine the direction of the stress path on the p-q plane

Net normal stress, (a

\\J - u.)

Figure 3.26 A series of Mohr circles

P Eysure 3.27 A stress path'for a series of stress states

Stress states occurring in the field during deposition, de-

saturation, and soil sampling can be described using the

stress path method, as illustrated in Fig 3.30 The accu-

mulation of soil sediments increases the vertical and hori-

zontal effective normal stresses in accordance with the KO-

loading line, as indicated by the stress path OA The shear

stress in the soil increases during Ko-loading

The r-coordinate can generally be considered equal to

the pore-water pressure since the pore-air pressure in the

field is usually atmospheric (i.e., zem gauge pressure)

Therefore, matric suction, (u, - u,,,), can be plotted as

being equivalent in magnitude to the pore-water pressure

The accumulation of water in the soil due to rainfall can

cause a soil to become saturated As the soil becomes sat-

urated, the stress state moves laterally on the saturation plane (i.e., AB) due to an increase in the positive pore- water pressure Upon excessive evaporation, there will be

a lowering of the groundwater table or a reduction in the pore-water pressure below atmospheric pressure The drying process can be represented by the stress path A C as the soil goes to an unsaturated condition The wetting and drying processes occur repeatedly, and induce what is re-

f e d to as the stress history of the soil Envimnmental changes cause a soil mass to repeatedly follow the stress

paths AB, BA, AC, CA, and AB The loadings of the soil due to drying and wetting are hydrostatic stress changes

The drying process of a soil generally causes tension

cracks to develop downward from the ground surface The

P

Figure 3.28 Stress paths for different matric suction values

62 3 STRESS STATE VARIABLES

Stress path A A(uh - u.) = A(U, - u.) (positive)

B A(Uh - u,) = 025 A(U, - Uu)

D A(Uh - u,) = - Ua)

c A(u,, - u,) = 0 , A(u, - u,) (positive)

E a(ur - u,) (negative), A(U, - u,) = 0

F A(u,, - u,) = A(U, - u,) (negative) w

P

Figure 3.29 Stress paths comsponding to various net normal stress loadings (modified after Lambe and Whitman, 1979)

tension cracks miuce the horizontal net normal stress

Upon subsequent wetting, the stress paths can become more

complicated than those shown in Pig 3.30

When a soil sample is removed from the ground, the

overburden pressure and the horizontal normal stress are

removed The removal of these stresses results in a ten-

dency for the sample to expand The expansion is resisted

by an increase in matric suction or a further decrease in

pore-water pressure The changes in pore-water pressure

due to changes in the total stress field can be defined in

ql

terms of the pore pressure parameters (see Chapter 8) The stress path followed during the sampling process is illus- trated by the stress path CD At point D, the net vertical and net horizontal stresses are zero, but the matric suction

is slightly higher than the in situ matric suction The soil

sample now has a hydrostatic stress state (Le., equal matric suction in all directions) The smss path method is later used to describe the shear strength and volume change be- havior of unsaturated soils in Chapters 9 and 12, respec- tively

r or decreasing pore-water pressure

P

Fipre 3.30 Stress paths for Ko-loading, wetting, drying and sampling

2400

2000

I

0 Total suction (Psychrometer) -

Matric suction (Pressure plate)

9 Osmotic suction (Squeezing

\ \ technique)-

\ - Osmotic plus matric suction -

\

The total suction, $, of a soil is made up of two compo-

nents, namely, the matric suction, (u, - u,), and the os-

motic suction, r:

$ = (u, - u,) + r (3.45)

Matric suction is known to vary with time due to envi-

ronmental changes Any change in suction affects the over-

all equilibrium of the soil mass Changes in suction may

be caused by a change in either one or both components of

soil suction

The role of osmotic suction has commonly been associ-

ated more with unsaturated soils than with saturated soils

However, osmotic suction is related to the salt content in

the pore-water which is present in both saturated and un-

saturated soils The role of osmotic suction is therefore

equally applicable to both unsaturated and saturated soils

Osmotic suction changes have an effect on the mechanical

behavior of a soil If the salt content in a soil changes, there

will be a change in the overall volume and shear strength

of the soil

Most engineering problems involving unsaturated soils

are commonly the result of environmental changes The

accumulation of water below a house may result in a re-

duction in matric suction and subsequent heaving of the

structure Similarly, the stability of an unsaturated soil

slope may be endangered by excessive rainfall that reduces

the suction in the soil These changes primarily affect the

matric suction component Osmotic suction changes are

generally less significant

Figure 3.31 shows the relative impoxtance of changes in

osmotic suction as compared $0 matric suction when water

content is varied The total and matric suction curves are

almost congruent one to another, particularly in the higher

water content range In other words, a change in total suc-

tion is essentially equivalent to a change in the matric suc-

tion [i.e., A$ - A (u, - u,)] For most geotechnical prob-

lems involving unsaturated soils, matric suction changes

can be substituted for total suction changes, and vice versa

There is a second reason why it is generally not neces-

sary to take osmotic suction into account The reason is

related to the pwedures commonly used in solving geo-

technical problems Generally, changes in osmotic suction

that occur in the field an simulated during the laboratory

testing for pertinent soil properties For example, let us

consider the swelling process of a soil as a result of rain-

fall The rainfall, which is distilled water, dilutes the pore-

water and changes the osmotic suction In the laboratory,

the soil specimen is generally immersed in distilled water

prior to performing the test (e.g., volume change test in an

oedometer) The matric suction is released to zero by im-

mersing the soil specimen The osmotic suction in the sam-

ple may also be changed in the process It is not necessary

22 24 26 28 30 3:

Water content, w (%) Ngure 3.31 Total, matric, and osmotic suction measurements

on compacted Regina clay (from Krahn and Fdlund, 1972)

to know the change in osmotic suction provided the changes occumng in the field m simulated in the laboratory test

In the case where the salt content of the soil is altered by chemical contamination, the effect of the osmotic suction change on the soil behavior may be significant In this case,

it is necessary to consider osmotic suction as part of the stress state This applies equally for saturated and unsatu- rated soils The role played by osmotic suction in influenc- ing the mechanical behavior of a soil may or may not be

of the same quantitative value as the role played by matric suction The osmotic suction is more closely related to the diffise double layer around the clay particles, whereas the matric suction is mainly associated with the air-water in-

terface (i.e., contractile skin), It is possible to consider the osmotic suction, T , as an independent, isotropic stress state variable:

In the case where both matric and osmotic suctions have the same quantitative influence on the behavior of a soil, the stress tensor (3.46) can be combined with the second

CHAPTER 4

Measurements of Soil Suction

The role of matric suction as one of the stress state vari-

ables for an unsaturated soil was illustrated in Chapter 3

The theory and components of soil suction will be pre-

sented first in this chapter, followed by a discussion of the

capillary phenomena Various devices and techniques for

measuring soil suction and its components a~ described in

detail in this chapter Each device or technique is intro-

duced with a history of its development, followed by its

working principle, calibration technique, and performance

The theoretical concept of soil suction was developed in

soil physics in the early 1900’s (Buckingham, 1907; Gad-

ner and Widtsoe, 1921; Richards, 1928; Schofield, 1935;

Edlefsen and Anderson, 1943; Childs and Collis-George,

1948; Bolt and Miller, 1958; Corey and Kemper, 1961;

Corey et al., 1967) The soil suction theory was mainly

developed in relation to the soil-water-plant system The

importance of soil suction in explaining the mechanical be-

havior of unsaturated soils relative to engineering problems

was introduced at the Road Research Laboratory in En-

gland (Croney and Coleman, 1948; Croney et al., 1950)

In 1965, the review panel for the soil mechanics sympo-

sium, “Moisture Equilibria and Moisture Changes in

Soils” (Aitchison, 1965a), provided quantitative defini-

tions of soil suction and its components from a thermody-

namic context These definitions have become accepted

concepts in geotechnical engineering (Krahn and Fredlund,

1972; Wray, 1984; Fredlund and Rahardjo, 1988)

Soil suction is commonly referred to as the free energy

state of soil water (Edlefsen and Anderson, 1943) The free

energy of the soil water can be measured in terms of the

partial vapor pressure of the soil water (Richards, 1965)

The thermodynamic relationship between soil suction (or

the free energy of the soil water) and the partial pressure

of the pore-water vapor can be written as follows:

J = VWO@lJ RT In (s) 4 0

where

J = soil suction or total suction (kPa)

R = universal (molar) gas constant [Le., 8.31432

T = absolute temperature [Le., T = (273.16 + t o )

O = temperature (“C)

J/(mol K)1

(K)1

vw0 = specific volume of water or the inverse of the

p w = density of water (Le., 998 kg/m3 at t o = 20°C)

o, = molecular mass of water vapor (Le., 18.016

u, = partial pressure of pore-water vapor (Ha)

density of water [Le., l/pw) (m3/kg)]

- kg/kmol)

-

uu0 = saturation pressure of water vapor over a flat sur- face of pure water at the same temperature (kPa)

Equation (4.1) shows that the reference state for quan-

tifying the components of suction is the vapor pressure above a flat surface of pure water (i.e., water with no salts

or impurities) The term iiv/iivo is called relative humidity,

constants in Eq (4.1) give a value of 135 022 kPa Equa- tion (4.1) can now be written to give a fixed relationship between total suction in kilopascals and relative vapor pressure:

(4.2)

Figure 4.1 shows a plot of Eq (4.1) for three different

temperatures The soil suction, $, is equal to 0.0 when the relative humidity, RH (Le., iiv/iivo), is equal to 100% [E@

(4.1)] A relative humidity value less than 100% in a soil

would indicate the presence of suction in the soil Figure

4.1 also shows that suction can be extremely high For ex- ample, a relative humidity of 94.24% at a temperature of

20°C corresponds to a soil suction of 8000 kPa The range

of suctions of interest in geotechnical engineering will cor- respond to high relative humidities

4.1.1 Components of Soil Suction

The soil suction as quantified in terms of the relative hu- midity [Eq (4.1)] is commonly called “total suction.’’ It

J = -135 022 In (iZv/iivo)

64

Total suction, t,b (kPe)

Figure 4.1 Relative humidity Venus total suction relationship

has two components, namely, matric and osmotic suction

The total, matric, and osmotic suctions can be defined as

follows (Aitchison, 1965a):

“Matric or capillary component of free energy-In suction

terms, it is the equivalent suction derived from the measum-

ment of the partial pressure of the water vapor in equilibrium

with the soil water, relative to the partial pressure of the water

vapor in equilibrium with a solution identical in composition

with the soil water

Osmotic (or solute) component of free energy-In suction

terms, it is the equivalent suction derived from the measum-

ment of the partial pressure of the water vapor in equilibrium

with a solution identical in composition with the soil water,

relative to the partial pressure of water vapor in equilibrium

with free pure water

Total suction or free energy of the soil water-In suction

terms, it is the equivalent suction derived from the measure-

ment of the partial pressure of the water vapor in equilibrium

with a solution identical in composition with the soil water,

relative to the partial pmssure of water vapor in equilibrium

with free pure water.”

The above definitions clearly state that the total suction

corresponds to the free energy of the soil water, while the

matric and osmotic suctions are the components of the free

energy In an equation form, this can be written as follows:

The spelling of the term “matric” is in accordance with the recommen-

dation of the Committee on Terminology of the Society of Soil Science

of America The definition is from their Glossary of Soil Science Termi-

nology (1963, 1970 and 1979)

Figure 4.2 illustrates the concept of total suction and its component as dated to the free energy of the soil water The matric suction component is commonly associated with the capillary phenomenon arising from the surface tension

of water Surface tension has been described in Chapter 2,

and is the result of the intermolecular forces acting on mol-

ecules in the contractile skin The capillary phenomenon is usually illustrated by the rise of a water surface in a cap- illary tube (Fig 4.2)

In soils, the pores with small radii act as capillary tubes

that cause the soil water to rise above the water table (Fig

4.3) The capillary water has a negative pressure with re-

Measured system

66 4 MEASUREMENTS OF SOIL SUCTION

Flgure 4.3 Capillary tubes showing the air-water interfaces at

different radii of cuwatuve (from Janssen and Dempsey, 1980)

spect to the air pressure, which is generally atmospheric

(i.e., u, = 0) in the field At low degms of saturation, the

pore-water pressures can be highly negative, with values

as low as minus 7000 kPa (Olson and Langfelder, 1965)

In this case, the adsorptive forces between soil particles are

believed to play an important role in sustaining the highly

negative pore-water pressures in soils

Consider a capillary tube filled with a soil water The

surface of the water in the capillary tube is curved and is

called a meniscus On the other hand, the same soil water

will have a flat surface when placed in a large container

The partial pressure of the water vapor above the curved

surface of soil water, U,, is less than the partial pressure of

the water vapor above a$& surface of the same soil water,

u,,, (i.e., E, < E,, in Fig 4.2) In other words, the rela-

-

tive humidity in a soil will decrease due to the presence of curved water surfaces produced by the capillary phenom- enon The water vapor pressure or the relative humidity decreases as the radius of curvature of the water surface decreases At the same time, the radius of curvature is in- versely proportional to the difference between the air and water pressures across the surface [Le., (u, - u,)] and is called matric suction This means that one component of the total suction is matric suction, and it contributes to a reduction in the relative humidity

The pore-water in a soil generally contains dissolved salts The water vapor pressure over a flat surface of sol- vent, is,,, is less than the water vapor pressure over a flat

surface of pure water, Zuo In other words, the relative hu-

midity decreases with increasing dissolved salts in the pore- water of the soil The decrease in relative humidity due to the presence of dissolved salts in the pore-water is referred

to as the osmotic suction, a

4.1.2 Typical Suction Values and Their Measuring Devices

Table 4.1 shows typical matric, osmotic, and total suction

values for two soils which often form the subgrade for mads built in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada (Kmhn and

Fredlund, 1972) The Regina Clay is a highly plastic, in- organic clay with a liquid limit of 78% and a plastic limit

of 31% The glacial till has a liquid limit of 34% and a

plastic limit of 17 96 Suction values are given in Table 4.1

for soils compacted to standard AASHTO conditions, with

the water contents at optimum and 2% dry of optimum Figure 4.4 shows experimental data illustrating hat the

matric plus the osmotic components of suction are equal to the total suction of the soil The presented data are for gla- cial till specimens compacted under modified AASHTO conditions at various initial water contents Each compo- nent of soil suction, and the total suction, were measured independently

Several devices commonly used for measuring total, ma-

tric, and osmotic suctions are listed in Table 4.2 The ex- Table 4.1 Typical Suction Values for Compacted Soils

Matric Suction, Osmotic Total Water Content (u, - u,) Suction, Suction,

the water content versus matric suction relationship in soils (Le., the soil-water characteristic curve) This relationship

is different for the wetting and drying portions of the curve,

and these differences can also be explained in terms of the capillary model

4.2.1 Capillary Height

Consider a small glass tube that is inserted into water under

atmospheric conditions (Fig 4.5) The water rises up in

the tube as a result of the surface tension in the contractile skin and the tendency of water to wet the surface of the glass tube (i.e., hygroscopic properties) This capillary be- havior can be analyzed by considering the surface tension,

T,, acting around the circumference of the meniscus The surface tension, T,, acts at an angle, a, from the vertical

The angle is known as the contact angle, and its magnitude depends on the adhesion between the molecules in the con- tractile skin and the material comprising the tube (i.e., glass)

Let us consider the vertical force equilibrium of the cap-

illary water in the tube shown in Fig 4.5 The vertical resultant of the surface tension (i.e., 2.rr r T, cos a) is re- sponsible for holding the weight of the water column, which

has a height of h, (i.e., r r2 h, pw g):

(4.4)

where

2rr T, cos a = rrr2h,p,g

t = radius of the capillary tube

T, = surface tension of water

a = contact angle

h, = capillary height

g = gravitational acceleration

0 Total suction (psychrometer)

Matric suction (pressure plate)

A Osmotic suction (squeezing technique)

(from Krahn and Fredlund, 1972)

planation of each device is given later The measurement

range and comments related to each device are shown in

Table 4.2

4.2 CAPILLARITY

The capillary phenomenon is associated with the matric

suction component of total suction The height of water

rise and the radius of curvature have direct implications on

Table 4.2 Devices for Measuring Soil Suction and Its Components

Tensiometers Negative pore-water pressures or 0 90 Difficulties with cavitation and air

required

in good contact with moist soil diffusion through ceramic cup matric suction when pore-air

pressure is atmospheric

ceramic disk

variable pore size ceramic sensor

psychrometer or electrical conductivity measurement sensors

"Controlled temperature environment to f 0.001 "C