HIGH AND LOW-END DISRUPTION Strategy that may result in huge new markets in which new players redefine industry rules to unseat the largest incumbents Strategy that appears at the low e
Trang 1Chapter 6
Crafting Business Strategy for Dynamic Contexts
Trang 2OBJECTIVES
Distinguish the ways in which firms’ strategies are related to dynamic contexts 1
Identify, compare, and contrast the various routes
to revolutionary strategies2
Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of choosing a first-mover strategy
3
Recognize when an incumbent is caught off guard by revolutionary strategy and identify defensive tactics to reduce the effects of this competition
4
Explain the difficulties and solutions to implementing revolutionary strategies5
Trang 3Business model options
Roxio Software Software and music Music
Rhap-A la carte Roxio and iTunes
sell single songs
Trang 4SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
“Think and act big and we’ll get smaller Think and act small and we’ll get bigger.”
– Herb Kelleher
Trang 5Mini-mills entered with a new business model and incumbent steel companies did not respond
As industries evolve and competition shifts from differentiation to price/low-cost, advantages shift between rivals
Arm and Hammer almost lost its lead position when baking soda became commoditized
Kodak
Technological
change
Trang 6REVERSE ENGINEERING
Reverse Engineering
Trang 7PHASES OF COMPETITIVE INTERACTION
Phase 1
Discoveryand
competitive new action
Phase 2
Customer reaction
Phase 3
Competitor reaction
Phase 4
Evaluation of action and reaction effectiveness
Academy of Management Executive 15:2 (2001), 59-70
Trang 8COMMODITIZATION
Based on priceBased on price?
Making a choice for a gas station
Trang 9THE IMPORTANCE OF SPEED
“What counts most in expeditionary marketing is not hitting a bull’s eye the first time, but how quickly one can improve one’s aim and get another arrow
on the way to the target.”
– Hamel and Prahalad
Trang 10HIGH AND LOW-END DISRUPTION
Strategy that may result in huge new markets in which new
players redefine industry rules to unseat the largest incumbents
Strategy that appears at the low
end of industry offerings,
targeting the least desirable of
incumbents’ customers
High-end
Low-end
Trang 11What factors should
be raised well above
the industry standard?
The key to discovering a
new value curve lies in
answering four basic
questions
Creating new markets:
A new value curve
Creating new markets:
A new value curve
Eliminate
What factors that theindustry has taken forgranted should be eliminated?
Create/Add
What factors that the industry has never offered should be created or added?
Trang 12COMPETITOR OR COMPLEMENTOR?
Competitor if customers value your product less when they have the other firm’s product than when they have your product alone OR it is less
attractive for a supplier to provide resources to you when it is also supplying the other firm than when
it is supplying you alone
Complementor if customers value your product more when they have the other player’s
product than when they have your product alone OR if it is more attractive for a supplier to provide resources to you when it is also
supplying the other firm than when it is supplying you alone
Trang 13Emphasizes better buyer service
Emphasizes efficient operation
of the model
Emphasizes adaptation and bilities that support competitive retaliation
capa-Emphasizes product or service value and offerings within industry definition
Dimensions
of competition Head-to-Head competition New-market creation
Looks across groups and segments
Emphasizes substitutes across industries
Emphasizes redefinition of the buyer and buyer’s preferences
Emphasizes rethinking of the industry business model
Emphasizes strategic seeking to shape the external environment over time
intent-Emphasizes complementary products and services within and across industries and segments
Trang 14PROS AND CONS OF FIRST MOVERS
• Rapid technology advances allow a fast-follower to leapfrog the first mover
• It achieves absolute cost advantage
• The first mover’s offering strikes a chord but is flawed
• Its reputation and image advantages
are hard to copy
• The first mover lacks a key complement (e.g., channel access) that the follower possesses
• Its customers are locked in (i.e.,
switching costs exist)
• First-mover costs outweigh the advantages of being the first-move
• Scale of the first move makes imitation
unlikely
A first-follower is often better off than
a first mover when:
A first-mover is often better off than a
fast follower when:
Trang 15A GALLERY OF FIRST-MOVERS AND FAST FOLLOWERS
Product Pioneer(s)
Imitators/fast followers Comments
Automated
teller machines
(ATMs)
DeLaRue (1967) Docutel (1969)
Diebold (1971) IBM (1973) NCR (1974)
The first movers were small entrepreneurial upstarts that faced two types of competitors: (1) larger firms with experience selling to banks and (2) the computer giants The first movers did not survive
Ballpoint pens Reynolds (1945)
Eversharp (1946)
Parker (1954) Bic (1960)
The pioneers disappeared when the fad first ended
in the late 1940s Parker entered 8 years later Bic entered last and sold pens as cheap
disposables Commercial
Credit cards Diners club (1950)
Visa/Master-Card (1966) American Express (1968)
The first mover was undercapitalized in a business
in which money is the key resource American Express entered last with funds and name recognition from its traveler’s check business Diet soda Kirsch’s No-Cal
(1952) Royal Crown’s Diet Rite Cola (1962)
Pepsi’s Patio Cola (1963)
Coke’s Tab (1964) Diet Pepsi (1964) Diet Coke (1982)
The first mover could not match the distribution advantages of Coke and Pepsi Nor did it have the money or marketing expertise needed for massive promotional campaigns
Trang 16A GALLERY OF FIRST-MOVERS AND FAST FOLLOWERS (CONT.)
Product Pioneer(s)
Imitators/fast followers Comments
Light beer Rheingold’s and
Gablinger’s (1968) Meister Brau Lite (1967)
Miller Lite (1975) Natural light (1977)
Coors light (1978) Bud light (1982)
The first movers entered 9 years before Miller and
16 years before Budweiser, but financial problems drove both out of business Marketing and
distribution determined the outcome Costly legal battles, again requiring access to capital, were commonplace
PC operating
systems
CP/M (1974) Microsoft DOS
(1981) Microsoft Windows (1985)
The first mover set the early industry standard but did not upgrade for the IBM PC Microsoft bought
an imitative upgrade and became the new standard Windows entered later and borrowed heavily from predecessors (and competitor Apple), then emerged as the leading interface
Video games Magnavox’s
Odyssey (1972) Atan’s Pong (1972)
Nintendo (1985) Sega (1989) Microsoft (1998)
The market went from boom to bust to boom The bust occurred when home computers seemed likely
to make video games obsolete Kids lost interest when games lacked challenge Price competition ruled Nintendo rekindled interest with better games and restored market order with managed
competition Microsoft entered with its Xbox when perceived gaming to be a possible component of its wired world
Trang 17Status of complementary assets
EVALUATING A FIRM’S FIRST-MOVER DEPENDENCIES
n It is difficult for anyone to make money: Industry
incumbent may simply give new product or service away as part of its larger bundle of offerings
Value-creation opportunities favor the holder of complementary assets, who will probably pursue a fast-follower strategy
First mover can do well depending on the
execution of its strategy
Value will go either to first mover or to party with the most bargaining power
Trang 19For example: American Airlines can partially
contain Southwest by using its bargaining power to secure more exclusive airport gates
Trang 20Try to short-circuit the moves of
innovators or new entrants before they
make them
For example: The Recording Industry
Association of America launched such a fierce legal attack on Napster that it
forced even smaller Napster-like firms to stay out of the fray
Trang 21For example: For years the American
Medical Association used regulators to attack chiropractors; now they shape chiropractic medicine to become a complement to traditional medicine
Trang 22For example: In the late 1980s Microsoft
purchased Intuit, the maker of Quicken and QuickBooks; because it identified money-management software as a high-growth opportunity
Trang 23For example: Kodak has improved the
quality of its film-based prints so that they are superior to many digital-based
alternatives
Trang 24REAL OPTIONS – FIVE CATEGORIES
1. Waiting-to-invest options The value of waiting to build a factory until better market information comes along may exceed the value
production from one plant to the other as conditions dictate
4. Exit (or abandonment) options The option to walk away from a project in response to new information increases its value
5. Learning options An initial investment may generate further information about a market opportunity and may help to determine whether the firm should add more capacity
Trang 25probing
Trang 26STAGING AND PACING IN THE REAL WORLD
British Airways “Five years is the maximum that you can go without refreshing the brand We did it (relaunched Club Europe Service) because we wanted to stay ahead so that we
could continue to win customers”
Emerson Electric “In each of the last three years we’ve introduced more than 100 major new products, which is about 70% above our pace of the early 1990s We plan to maintain this rate
and, overall, have targeted increasing new products to (equal) 35% of total sales”
Intel The inventor of Moore’s Law stated that the power of the computer chip would double every 18 months IBM builds a new manufacturing facility every nine
months “We build factories two years in advance of needing them, before we have the products to run in them, and before we know the industry is going to grow”
Gillette 40% of Gillette’s sales every five years must come from entirely new products (prior to its acquisition by P&G) Gillette raises prices at a pace set to match price
increases in a basket of market goods (which includes items such as a newspaper, a candy bar, and a can of soda) Gillette prices are never raised faster than the price
of the market basket.
3M 30% of sales must come from products that are fewer than 4 years old