Emergence of modern SE Asian economies 1... Comparisons: the region in 1970 and 2008 Big events and their growth implications Growth and development questions map... Main development
Trang 11b Emergence of modern SE
Asian economies
1
Trang 2Comparisons: the region in 1970 and 2008
Big events and their growth implications
Growth and development questions
map
Trang 3Main development strategies – 1970s
1970: poor, agrarian, undereducated, weak infrastructure,
little modern manufacturing, dependent on primary exports
Goals: industrializ’n, less import dependence, food security
Main development policies: Use natural resource export
revenues to finance agricultural and industrial growth
Import-substitution policies (ISI; protection) for industry
Upside: resource abundance, ‘easy’ import substitution
(consumer goods, simple manufactures)
Downside: vulnerability to terms of trade shocks, inefficiency of protected “infant” industries
Growth outcomes have been diverse…
3
Trang 5Early Expansion Recession Reagan Post-Plaza Miracle Asian Crisis Convergence Recovery &
1970-82 1983-86 1987-96 1997-1999 2000-08 Cambodia 6.06 7.50 Indonesia 4.94 3.50 6.24 -7.71 3.85 Malaysia 5.05 -0.27 6.60 -3.23 3.12 Philippines 2.66 -6.37 1.22 -0.69 2.87 Singapore 6.54 2.27 5.84 0.69 2.47 Thailand 4.15 3.33 8.17 -3.95 3.74 Vietnam 5.35 3.86 6.15 Lao PDR 3.39 3.22 5.01 World 1.47 2.14 1.34 1.39 1.66
Trang 6Differences between countries and
through time:
Partly due to country-specific policies
6
Trang 74 defining events in the global economy
First oil price shock (1973-5)
Recycling of “petrodollars” in global markets > cheap credit for
developing countries
Second oil price shock 1979-80
Global recession; high real interest rates on debt
Global commodity price slump early 1980s
Export revenues collapse for resource-dependent economies Debt servicing crises and recessions (1985) Collapse of inward-oriented development strategies
Plaza Accord 1985
Recovery in US and world economies ( > boom in global manuf trade) and “hollowing-out” of Japanese economy
( > SE Asian FDI boom)
Trang 88
Trang 9PLAZA ACCORD
Trang 10Boom, bubble and bust
Countries that pursued macro stability in 1970s emerged in better shape – less debt burden meant more productive investment
These countries were attractive targets for E Asian FDI after 1985
Boom: “E Asian Miracle” (Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia)
Based on rising exports of low-end manufactures
Financed largely by foreign fixed capital investments
Bubble: speculative booms in property, building, stocks
Financed by short-term borrowing from foreign banks
Bust: loss of export competitiveness, financial crisis (1997-99)
Chinese competition; labor costs
Inability to earn enough to service foreign debts
10
Trang 114 defining events in Asian regional econ.
ASEAN (1967+)
Regional political grouping, later economic grouping (ASEAN Free Trade Area; ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement 2010)
China’s new “Open Door” policy 1978+
Re-entry of China to global economy
RMB (Chinese currency) devaluation 1994
Dissolution of the Soviet Union 1991
Withdrawal of Soviet economic assistance to Asian allies (Vietnam) after 1986
Asian Financial Crisis 1997-99
“Correction” brings an end to “miracle” years, 1988-96
Trang 1212
Trang 13Enter the dragon
China’s GDP growth about 10%/yr since 1990
Trade growth around 15% per year
Rising share of world exports, esp manufactures
Driven by economic growth and liberalization (WTO
membership)
China’s entry to world market:
Adds hundreds of millions of workers to the global labor
endowment
Creates intense competition for labor-intensive exports
Generates huge demand growth for inputs to these products
Trang 14A Historical Perspective”
Notice distinction between NIEs (Singapore, HK,
Taiwan, Korea) and SE Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia)
What are the four “critical aspects” of Asian
economies that make rapid growth possible?
This was written in 1997 Are the same 4 things
“critical” to development today? Do you think there are any changes?
14
Trang 15Dev’t prospects & strategies – 1970s
What should be main econ development goals?
What dev’t strategies/policies are best? For whom?
GROUPS:
• President; 1-2 urban industrial representatives; 3-4 rural/farm representatives
• BUT each urban rep has 2X votes, AND president can ignore all others if s/he chooses
• Discuss, decide, report back (5-10 min)
15