1975 An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.. 1995 A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.. 1965 Aspects of the Theor
Trang 1REFERENCES
Abney, S.P (1987) The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect, PhD diss., MIT
Akmajian, A & Heny, F (1975) An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press,
Cambridge Mass
Alexopoulou, T & Kolliakou, D (2002) ‘On Linkhood, Topicalisation and Clitic Left Dislocation’,
Journal of Linguistics 38: 193-245
Antony, L and Hornstein, N (2002) Chomsky and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford
Aronoff, M (1976) Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Aronoff, M & Fuhrhop, N (2002) ‘Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: closing
suffixes and the monosuffix constraint’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451-490
Atkinson, M (2003) Unpublished course notes, University of Essex
Baker, C.L (1970) ‘Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question
morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6: 197-219
Baker, M (1988) Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Baltin, M (1995) ‘Floating quantifiers, PRO and predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 199-248
Baltin, M and Collins, C (eds) (2001) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell,
Oxford
Barss, A (2001) ‘Syntactic reconstruction effects’ in Baltin and Collins (eds), pp 670-696
Basilico, D (2003) ‘The topic of small clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 1-35
Bejar, S & Massam D (1999) ‘Multiple case checking’, Syntax 2: 65-79
Belletti, A and Rizzi, L (1988) ‘Psych-verbs and θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
6: 291-352
Bernstein, J.B (2001) ‘The DP hypothesis: Identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain’, in Baltin and Collins (eds) pp 536-61
Bobaljic, J (1995) Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection, PhD diss., MIT
Bobaljic, J (2002) ‘A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and “covert” movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20: 197-267
Boeckx, C (2000) ‘A note on Contraction’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 357-366
Boeckx, C (2001) ‘Scope reconstruction and A-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
19: 503-548
Bošković, Z (1997) ‘On certain violations of the superiority condition, AgrO and economy of derivation’,
Journal of Linguistics 33: 227-254
Bošković, Z (2001) On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related
Phenomena, Elsevier, Amsterdam
Bošković, Z (2002a) ‘On multiple wh-fronting’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351-383
Bošković, Z (2002b) ‘A-Movement and the EPP’, Syntax 5: 167-218
Bowerman, M (1988) ‘The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid an overly general
grammar?’, in J Hawkins (ed.) Explaining Language Universals, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.73-101
Trang 2Bowers, J (1993) ‘The syntax of predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591-656
Bowers, J (2002) ‘Transitivity’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183-224
Braine, M.D.S (1971) ‘Three suggestions regarding grammatical analyses of children’s language’ in
C.A Ferguson & D.I Slobin (eds) Studies of Child Language Development, Holt Rinehart and Winston,
New York, pp.421-429
Branigan, P (1992) Subjects and Complementisers, PhD diss., MIT
Branigan, P & MacKenzie, M (2002) ‘Altruism, Ā-movement and object agreement in Innu-aimûn’,
Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385-407
Brody, M (1995) A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Brown R., Cazden C & Bellugi U (1968) ‘The child’s grammar from I to III’, in J.P Hill (ed.) Minnesota Symposium on Child Development vol 2, pp 28-73
Brown R & Hanlon, C (1970) ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech’, in J.R
Hayes (ed.) Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York, pp 11-53
Burton, S & Grimshaw, J (1992) ‘Coordination and VP-internal subjects’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305-13 Burzio, L (1986) Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht
Carrier, J & Randall, J.H (1992) ‘The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives’,
Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173-234
Cheng, L (1997) On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Garland, New York
Cheng, L & Rooryck, J (2000) ‘Licensing Wh-in-situ’, Syntax 3: 1-19
Chomsky, N (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Chomsky, N (1968) Interview with S Hamshire in The Listener, May 1968
Chomsky, N (1972) Language and Mind (enlarged edition), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York Chomsky, N (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht
Chomsky, N (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT
Press, Cambridge Mass
Chomsky, N (1986a) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York
Chomsky, N (1986b) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Chomsky, N (1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in Hale and Keyser (eds) pp 1-52 (reprinted as chapter 3 of Chomsky 1995)
Chomsky, N (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Chomsky, N (1998) Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, no 15 (also published in R Martin, D Michaels and J Uriagereka (eds) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp 89-155)
Chomsky, N (1999) Derivation by Phase, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, no 18 (also published in
M Kenstowicz (ed) (2001) Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp.1-52) Chomsky, N (2001) Beyond Explanatory Adequacy, unpublished manuscript, MIT
Chomsky, N (2002) On Nature and Language, Cambridge University Press
Chomsky, N & Lasnik, H (1977) ‘Filters and Control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425-504
Chomsky, N & Lasnik, H (1995) ‘The theory of principles and parameters’, in Chomsky 1995,
pp 13-127
Chung, S (1994) ‘Wh-agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 1-45
Chung, S (1998) The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago
Cinque, G (1994)‘Evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in G Cinque, J Koster,
J.-Y Pollock, L Rizzi & R Zanuttini (eds) Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, pp 85-110
Cinque, G (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cole, P (1982) Imbabura Quechua, North-Holland, The Hague
Cole, P and Hermon, G (2000) ‘Partial wh-movement: Evidence from Malay’ in Lutz, Müller and van Stechow (eds) pp 101-130
Contreras, J (1987) ‘Small clauses in Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
5: 225-44
Cormack, A & Smith, N (1999) ‘Where is a sign merged?’, Glot International 4,6:21
Cormack, A & Smith, N (2000a) ‘Head Movement and negation in English’, Transactions of the
Trang 3Philological Society 98: 49-85
Cormack, A & Smith, N (2000b) ‘Fronting: The Syntax and Pragmatics of “Focus” and “Topic”’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 387-417
Crain, S & Pietroski, P (2002) ‘Why language acquisition is a snap’, The Linguistic Review 19: 163-
183
Culicover, P (1991) ‘Topicalization, inversion and complementiser in English’, in D Delfitto, M
Everaert, A., Evers, & F Stuurman (eds) OTS Working Papers: Going Romance and Beyond,
University of Utrecht, pp 1-45
Curtiss, S (1977) Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day “Wild Child”, Academic Press,
London
Dayal, V (2002) ‘Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: Wh-in-situ and scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 512-520
Déchaine, R.-M & Wiltschko, M (2002) ‘Decomposing pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442 den Dikken, M (2001) ‘Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement’, The Linguistic Review 18: 19-41 Denham, K (2000) ‘Optional wh-movement in Babine-Witsuwit’en’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 199-251
Drubig, H.N (2003) ‘Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions’, Linguistics 41: 1-50
Dukes, M (2000) ‘Agreement in Chamorro’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 575-588
du Plessis, H (1977) ‘Wh-movement in Afrikaans’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 211-222
Embick, D & Noyer, R (2001) ‘Movement operations after Syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555-595
Epstein, S & Seeley, D (1999) ‘Specifying the GF “subject”, eliminating A-chains and the EPP with a derivational model’, ms University of Michigan
Ernst, T (1991) ‘On the scope principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 750-6
Fabb, N (1988) ‘English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527-39
Fanselow G & Mahajan A (2000) ‘Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying and successive cyclicity’, in Lutz, Müller & von Stechow (eds), pp.195-230
Felser, C (1999a) Verbal Complement Clauses: A Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions,
Benjamins, Amsterdam
Felser, C (1999b) ‘Perception and control: A Minimalist analysis of English direct perception
complements’, Journal of Linguistics 34: 351-385
Felser, C (2004) ‘Wh-copying, phases and successive cyclicity’, Lingua 114: 543-574
Fillmore, C.J (1968) ‘The case for case’, in E Bach & R.T Harms (eds) Universals in Linguistic Theory,
Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp.1-88
Fillmore, C.J (1972) ‘Subjects, speakers and roles’ in D Davidson & G Harman (eds) Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht
Fodor, J.D & Crowther, C (2002) ‘Understanding stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 105-145
Fox, D (2000) Economy and Semantic Interpretation, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Frampton, J & Gutmann, S (1999) ‘Cyclic computation, a computationally efficient minimalist syntax’,
Syntax 2: 1-27
Freidin, R & Vergnaud, J.R (2001) ‘Exquisite connections: some remarks on the evolution of linguistic
theory’, Lingua 111: 639-666
Goodall, G (1999) ‘Accusative case in passives’, Linguistics 37: 1-12
Green, L (1998) Semantic and Syntactic Patterns in African American English, ms University of
Massachusetts
Grimshaw, J (1993) Minimal Projection, Heads, and Optimality, draft manuscript, Rutgers University
Groat, E & O’Neil, J (1996) ‘Spell-out at the LF interface’, in W Abraham, S.D Epstein, H Thráinsson
& C.J.-W Zwart (eds) Minimal Ideas, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp.113-139
Gruber, J.S (1965) Studies in Lexical Relations, PhD diss., MIT
Gruber, J.S (1976) Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam
Guasti, M.T (2002) Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar, Bradford books, MIT Press,
Cambridge Mass
Guasti, M.T., Thornton R & Wexler K (1995) ‘Negation in children’s questions: The case of English’, in
B MacLaughlin & S McEwen (eds) Proceedings of the 19 th Annual Boston University Conference on
Trang 4Language Development, Cascadilla Press, Somerville Mass, pp.228-239
Guilfoyle, E., Hung, H and Travis, L (1992) ‘Spec of IP and spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian
languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375-414
Haegeman, L (1994, 2nd edition) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Blackwell, Oxford Haegeman, L (1995) The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press
Haegeman, L (2000) ‘Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP’, in Transactions of
the Philological Society 98: 121-160
Hale, K & Keyser, S J (1991) On the Syntax of Argument Structure, Lexicon Project Working
Papers, MIT, Center for Cognitive Science, Cambridge Mass
Hale, K & Keyser, S J (1993) ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of semantic relations’,
in Hale & Keyser (eds), pp 53-109
Hale, K & Keyser, S.J (1993) (eds) The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Hale, K & Keyser, S J (1994) ‘Constraints on argument structure’, in B Lust, M Suñer & J Whitman
(eds) Heads, Projections and Learnability, Erlbaum, Hillsdale New Jersey, vol 1, pp.53-71
Halle, M & Marantz, A (1993) ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in Hale and Keyser (eds), pp.111-176
Han, C.-H (2001) ‘Force, negation and imperatives’, The Linguistic Review, 18: 289-325
Henry, A (1995) Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter-Setting, Oxford
University Press, Oxford
Hiemstra, I (1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 8: 97-110
Holmberg, A (2000) ‘Am I unscientific? A reply to Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 837-842
Hornstein, N (1995) Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford
Huang, C.-T J (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD diss., MIT
Huang, C.-T J (1993) ‘Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences’,
Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103-38
Hurford, J (1991) ‘The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition’, Cognition 40: 159-201 Hyams, N (1986) Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht
Hyams, N (1992) ‘A reanalysis of null subjects in child language’, in J Weissenborn, H Goodluck & T
Roeper (eds) Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, London, pp.249-267
Ingham, R (2000) ‘Negation and OV order in Late Middle English’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 13-38 Jackendoff, R.S (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass Jaeggli, O & Safir, K (1989) The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Johnson, K (1991) ‘Object positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636
Johnson, K (2002) ‘Restoring exotic co-ordinations to normalcy’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 97-156
Jones, M.A (1994) Sardinian Syntax, Routledge, London
Julien, M (2001) ‘The syntax of complex tenses’, The Linguistic Review 18: 125-167
Kayne, R S (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrect
Kayne, R.S (1989) ‘Facets of Romance past participle agreement’, in P Benincà (ed.) Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp 85-103
Kayne, R.S (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Keyser, S.J & Roeper, T (1992) ‘Re: the abstract clitic hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89-125 Kishimoto, H (2000) ‘Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 557-566
Kitagawa, Y (1986) Subjects in English and Japanese, PhD diss., University of Massachusetts
Klima, E S (1964) ‘Negation in English’ in J.A Fodor & J.J Katz (eds) The Structure of Language,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 246-323
Koopman, H & Sportiche, D (1991) ‘The position of subjects’, Lingua 85: 211-58
Kuroda, Y (1988) ‘Whether we agree or not’, Lingvisticae Investigationes 12: 1-47
Landau, I (1999) Elements of Control, PhD diss., MIT
Landau, I (2001) ‘Control and Extraposition: the case of Super-Equi’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 109-152
Landau, I (2002) ‘(Un)interpretable Neg in Comp’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 465-492
Lappin, S., Levine, R.D., and Johnson, D.E (2000a) Topic…Comment: The structure of unscientific
revolutions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 665-671
Trang 5Lappin, S., Levine, R.D., and Johnson, D.E (2000b) ‘The revolution confused: A response to our critics’,
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 873-890
Lappin, S., Levine, R.D., and Johnson, D.E (2001) ‘The revolution maximally confused’, Natural
Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 901-919
Larson, R (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-91
Larson, R (1990) ‘Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589-632
Lasnik, H (1995) ‘Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program’, in H
Campos and P Kempchinksky (eds) Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Georgetown
University Press, Georgetown, pp 251-75
Lasnik, H (1998) ‘Some reconstruction riddles’, in Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 83-98, Penn
Linguistics Circle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Lasnik, H (1999) ‘Chains of arguments’, in S.D Epstein & N Hornstein (eds) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp.189-215
Lasnik, H (2000) Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass (with Depiante, M & Stepanov, A.)
Lasnik, H (2001) ‘A note on the EPP’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 356-361
Lasnik, H & Sobin, N (2000) ‘The Who/Whom Puzzle: On the preservation of an archaic feature’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 343-371
Lasnik, H & Uriagereka, J (2002) ‘On the poverty of the challenge’, The Linguistic Review 19: 147-150
Lebeaux, D (1991) ‘Relative clauses, licensing and the nature of derivation’, in S Rothstein (ed.)
Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp 209-239 Lebeaux, D (1995) ‘Where does Binding Theory apply?’, in University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 63-88
Legate, J.A & Yang, C.D (2002) ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 151-162
Lenneberg, E (1967) Biological Foundations of Language, Wiley, New York
Lightfoot, D & Hornstein, N (eds) (1994) Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press
Longobardi, G (1994) ‘Reference and proper names’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609-66
Longobardi, G (1996) ‘The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory’, OTS Working Papers no 5,
Research Institute for Language and Speech, Utrecht
Longobardi, G (2001) ‘The Structure of DPs: Some Principles, Parameters and Problems’, in Baltin and Collins (eds), pp 562-603
Lutz, U., Müller, G and von Stechow A (eds) (2000) Wh-Scope Marking, Benjamins, Amsterdam Lyons, C (1999) Definiteness, Cambridge University Press
McCloskey, J (2000) ‘Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English’, Linguistic Inquiry
31: 57-84
McCloskey, J (2001) ‘The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 67-100 McDaniel, D (1989) ‘Partial and multiple wh-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
7: 565-604
McNally, L (1992) ‘VP-coordination and the VP-internal subject hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry
23: 336-41
McNeill, D (1966) ‘Developmental Psycholinguistics’ in F Smith & G.A Miller (eds) The Genesis of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp.15-84
Marcus, G.F (1993) ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition’, Cognition 46: 53-85
Martin, R (2001) ‘Null case and the distribution of PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141-166
Morgan, J.L and Travis, L (1989) ‘Limits on negative information in language input’, Journal of Child Language 16: 531-552
Namai, K (2000) ‘Gender features in English’, Linguistics 38: 771-779
Nasu, N (2001) ‘Associating EPP with f-completeness’ Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31: 351-367
Nasu, N (2002) Aspects of the Syntax of A-Movement: A Study of English Infinitival Contructions and Related Phenomena, PhD diss., University of Essex
Nunes, J (1999) ‘Linearization of chains and phonetic realisation of chain links’, in S.D Epstein & N
Hornstein (eds) Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp 217-249
Nunes, J (2001) ‘Sideward movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303-344
Trang 6Nunes, J & Uriagereka, J (2000) ‘Cyclicity and extraction domains’, Syntax 3: 20-43
Ochi, M (1999) ‘Multiple spell-out and PF-adjacency’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 29
Oya, T (2002) ‘Reflexives and resultatives: Some differences between English and German’, Linguistics 40: 961-986
Pesetsky, D (1995) Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Pesetsky, D (1997) ‘Optimality Theory and Syntax: Movement and Pronunciation’, in D Archangeli &
D.T Langendoen (eds) Optimality Theory: An Overview, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 134-170
Pesetsky, D (1998) ‘Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation’ in P Barbosa, D Fox,
P Hagstrom, M McGinnis & D Pesetsky (eds) Is the Best Good Enough? MIT Press, Cambridge, pp
337-383
Pesetsky, D (2000) Phrasal Movement and Its Kin, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Phillips, C (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37-90
Piattelli-Palmarini, M (2000) ‘The metric of open-mindedness’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
18: 859-862
Picallo, M.C (1991) ‘Nominals and nominalization in Catalan’, Probus 3: 279-316
Pollock, J.-Y (1989) ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424
Polinksky, M & Potsdam, E (2001) ‘Long-distance agreement and Topic in Tsez’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 583-646
Postal, P.M (1966) ‘On so-called pronouns in English’, in F Dinneen (ed.) Nineteenth Monograph on Language and Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC (reprinted in D Reibel & S Schane (eds) (1969) Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff NJ, pp 201-224) Pullum, G.K & Scholz, B.C (2002) ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The
Linguistic Review 19: 9-50
Radford, A (1988) Transformational Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Radford, A (1993) ‘Head-hunting: on the trail of the nominal Janus’, in G Corbett, N.M Fraser & S
McGlashan (eds) Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73-111 Radford, A (1997a) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press, London Radford, A (1997b) Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction, Cambridge University Press, London
Radford, A, Atkinson M, Britain D, Clahsen H and Spencer A (1999) Linguistics: An Introduction,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ramat, P (1999) ‘Linguistic categories and linguists’ categorizations’, Linguistics 37: 157-180
Reintges, C.H, LeSourd P and Chung, S (2002) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, paper presented to Workshop on Wh-Movement, University of Leiden, December 2002
Reuland, E (2000) ‘Revolution, discovery and an elementary principle of logic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 843-848
Reuland, E (2001a) ‘Primitives of Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439-492
Reuland, E (2001b) ‘Confusion compounded’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 879-885
Reuland E & Everaert M (2001) ‘Deconstructing Binding’ in Baltin & Collins (eds), pp.634-670
Richards, N (1997) What Moves Where When in Which Language? PhD diss., MIT
Ritter, E (1991) ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in
S Rothstein (ed) Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Academic Press, New York,
pp 37-62
Rizzi, L (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’ in L Haegeman (ed) Elements of Grammar,
Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 281-337
Rizzi, L (2000) ‘Remarks on early null subjects’, in M.-A Freidemann & L Rizzi (eds) The Acquisition
of Syntax, pp.269-292
Rizzi, L (2001a) ‘Relativized minimality effects’, in Baltin & Collins, pp 89-110
Rizzi, L (2001b) ‘On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in G Cinque and
G Salvi (eds) Current Issues in Italian Syntax, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.287-296
Rizzi, L (2003) ‘Locality and Left Periphery’ to appear in A Belletti (ed) Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol.2, Oxford University Press
Roberts, I (1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Roberts, I (1994) ‘Two types of head movement in Romance’, in Hornstein & Lightfoot (eds) pp 207-
Trang 7242
Roberts, I (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423-460
Roberts, I (2000) ‘Caricaturing dissent’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 849-857
Roberts, I (2001a) ‘Who has confused what? More on Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 887-890
Roberts, I (2001b) ‘Head Movement’, in Baltin and Collins (eds), pp.113-147
Romero, M (1997) ‘The correlation between scope reconstruction and connectivity effects’, in E Curtiss,
J Lyle and G Webster (eds) Proceedings of the XVI West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics,
CLSI, Stanford, pp 351-365
Rosen, S.T (1990) Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, Garland, New York
Ross, J.R (1967) Constraints on Variables in Syntax, PhD diss., MIT (published as Infinite Syntax! by
Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, 1986)
Runner, J (1998) Noun Phrase Licensing and Interpretation, Garland, New York
Rymer, R (1993) Genie: A Scientific Tragedy, Harper Perennial, New York
Sabel, J (2002) ‘A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands’, The Linguistic Review 19: 271-315
Saddy, D (1991) ‘Wh scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia’ in L Cheng & H Demirdache (eds) MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 183-218
Safir, K (1986) Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sag, I (1997) ‘English relative clause constructions’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 431-483
Sampson, G (2002) ‘Exploring the richness of the stimulus’, The Linguistic Review 19: 73-104
Sauerland, U (1998) The Meaning of Chains, PhD diss., MIT
Sauerland, U & Elbourne, P (2002) ‘Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order’,
Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283-319
Scholz, B.C & Pullum, G.K (2002) ‘Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism’, The
Linguistic Review 19: 185-223
Seppänen , A & Trotta, J (2000) ‘The wh+that pattern in present-day English’, in J.M Kirk (ed.)
Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 161-175 Sigurðsson, H.Á (1996) ‘Icelandic finite verb agreement’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1-46
Smith, N (1998) ‘Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition’, Glot International 3, 7: 7
Smith, N (1999) Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Smith, N & Cormack, A (2002) ‘Indeterminacy, inference, iconicity and interpretation: Aspects of the
grammar-pragmatics interface’, in M Makri-Tsilipakou (ed) Selected Papers on Theoretical and
Applied Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp.38-53
Sobin, N (2002) ‘The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect, and minimal CP’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 527-560
Sorace, A (2000) ‘Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs’, Language 76: 859-890 Speas, P (1986) Adjunction and Projections in Syntax, PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge Mass
Spencer, A.J (1991) Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford
Sportiche, D (1988) ‘A Theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’,
Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425-49
Sportiche, D (1998) ‘Movement, agreement and case’, in Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure,
Routledge, London, pp 88-243
Stepanov, A (2001) ‘Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure’, Syntax 4: 94-125
Stockwell, R., Schachter, P and Hall Partee, B (1973) The Major Syntactic Structures of English, Holt
Rinehart and Winston, New York
Stowell, T (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, PhD dissertation, MIT
Stowell, T (1982) ‘The tense of infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561-570
Stroik, T (1990) ‘Adverbs as V-Sisters’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654-61
Stroik, T (2001) ‘On the light verb hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 362-369
Svenonius, P (2002a) ‘Case is uninterpretable aspect’, http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage html
Svenonius, P (2002b) ‘Icelandic case and the structure of events’ http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/ paperspage.html
Tallerman, M.O (1993) ‘Case assignment and the order of functional projections in Welsh’, in A
Trang 8Siewierska (ed.) Eurotyp Working Papers, Programme in Language Typology, European Science
Foundation, pp.1-41
Taraldsen, T (1990) ‘D-projections and N-projections in Norwegian’, in M Nespor & J Mascarò (eds)
Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp 419-431
Ten Hacken, P (2001) Review of Radford (1997a/b), Natural Language Engineering, 7/1
Thomas, M (2002) ‘Development of the concept of “the poverty of stimulus”’, The Linguistic Review
19: 51-71
Thornton, R (1995) ‘Referentiality and Wh-Movement in Child English: Juvenile D-Linkuency’,
Language Acquisition 4: 139-175
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I (1988) ‘The origins and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation’, Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 3: 1-30
Travis, L (1984) Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation, PhD diss., MIT
Ura, H (1993) ‘On feature-checking for wh-traces’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 243-280 Ura, H (2001) ‘Local economy and generalized pied-piping’, The Linguistic Review 18: 169-191
Uriagereka, J (1988) On Government, PhD diss., University of Connecticut
Uriagereka, J (1998) Rhyme and Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass
Uriagereka, J (2000) ‘On the emptiness of “design” polemics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
18: 863-871
Uriagereka, J (2001) ‘Cutting derivational options’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
19: 891-900
Vainikka, A & Levy, Y (1999) ‘Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew’, Natural Language and
Linguistic Theory 17: 613-671
Vikner, S (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in Germanic Languages, Oxford University
Press, Oxford
Watanabe, A (2001) ‘Wh-in-situ languages’, in Baltin and Collins, pp 203-225
Wexler, K (1994)‘Optional Infinitives, Head Movement and the Economy of Derivations’, in Lightfoot & Hornstein (eds), pp 305-350
Willis, D (2000) ‘On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh’, Journal of
Linguistics 36: 531-73
Woolford, E (1991) ‘VP-internal subjects in VSO and nonconfigurational languages’, Linguistic
Inquiry 22: 503-40
Yang, C.D (1999) ‘Unordered Merge and its linearization’, Syntax 1: 38-64
Zagona, K (1987) Verb Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Zwicky, A (2002) ‘I wonder what kind of construction that this kind of example illustrates’, in D Beaver,
L.D Casillas Martínez, B.Z Clark & S Kaufmann (eds) The Construction of Meaning, CSLI
Publications, pp 219-248