Chapter 8CRAMER'S INTEGRAL THEOREM AND ITS REFINEMENT BY PETROV „ 1.. Statement of the theorem The first general result in the theory of large deviations was the integral theorem of Cram
Trang 1Chapter 8
CRAMER'S INTEGRAL THEOREM AND ITS REFINEMENT BY PETROV
„ 1 Statement of the theorem
The first general result in the theory of large deviations was the integral theorem of Cramer [19], published in 1938, which has considerable computational and analytical usefulness It was refined and generalised
by Petrov [133] in 1954 In this chapter we discuss the work of Petrov, keeping for simplicity to the case of identically distributed variables X;
It should be remarked that the most natural method for proving integral theorems under Cramer's condition is the method of steepest descents, whose use for local theorems was described in the last chapter In the case in which the distributions of the X; are different such an approach encounters, however, considerable difficulty
Let the X, satisfy (7 1 1) and Cramer's condition (7 1 2), and let 2 (z) denote Cramer's series (7 2 20) Write
x -P(x)= ( tic)-2
1-00
e-2`zdt ,
Zn = (Xi + X2+ + X©) / ant ,
V (y) = P (X; < y) Then Petrov's refinement of Cramer's theorem, in the identically distri-buted case, has the following form
Theorem 8 1 1 For x > 1, x = o (n2 ), we have P(Z,, > X)
rx3
X
X
-exp+ n2
n2
1+0
n2 ,
P(Zn< - x)
=ex
p 3~
1+
x 0
\
n 2
n 2 )
n 2 ] 0(-X)
Trang 2
CRAMER'S INTEGRAL THEOREM ; ITS REFINEMENT BY PETROV Chap 8
„ 2 The introduction of auxiliary random variables Since
E(exp aJXXj) < oo ,
we may write, for Jhj <a,
00
R = R (h) =
f-00
ehl'dV (y)
(8 2 1) Let XX be independent random variables with the distribution function
When n=1 this follows trivially from (8 2 2) Suppose it is true for a particular value of n Then
P (x) = R-1
X
f -00 e"''d V (y) , (8 2 2) and write
(8 2 3) W©(x)=P(X1+ +X©<x),
W© X =P (X1+ +X©<x) Then
in=E(X,) = R-1
J
xe''XdV(x)=
-00
(8 2 4)
R'(h)
d log R,
-
=
R (h) dh and
(8 2 5) _
R©
R , 2 d2
62 V
log R (R
= (X;)
Write
(8 2 6)
F© (x) = P (XI + +X© < c0 x) , F© (x) = P (X1 + + X© - mn < 60 x)
We prove by induction on n the fundamental relation
(8 2 7) W© (x) = R"
T X
e - ' dW©(y) 00
Trang 38 2
INTRODUCTION OF AUXILIARY RANDOM VARIABLES co
W"+ 1 (x )
-
V (x - z) dW,,(z) _
f -o0
f
w
R-1
V(x-z)e-hwdWn(z) _
§~
x z
= Rn +1
J -00
dWn(z)e-hz
J - e -hsdV(~)
(( 8 2 8) 00
Making the substitution ~ =11- z, (8 2_8) becomes
J
Go
Jx
R "+1
f -00
dW" (z) e -hz
f -00
e-h(''-z)dn
V (h-Z) _
x
00
=Rn+1
J-e-h',d
V(~_z)dWn(z)=
cc
- cc
whence the induction succeeds, and (8 2.7) is proved
From (8 2.7) and (8.2.6) we have
F n (x) = Wn (xanl) ,
Fn (x) = Wn(mn + xan+) ,
so that
xan '/2
F (x) = Rn
f-00
e-h''dWn(y~)
Setting q= min + y6n2, we have
Letting x- oo,
1 = R n a - hmn
so that
e -h
(ax - mn'/z)/o'/z
Fn( x ) = Rn e -hmn'
exp (-h yan'/z) dFn
(y)
(8 2 11)
- 00
00
J -00
exp (-hy6n z) dFn (y) ,
(8 2 10)
"
f
cc
1-Fn (x)=R e-hmn
exp(-hy6nZ)dFn (y)
(8 2 12)
(ax-Fn )/a'/a
1 73
Trang 4
CRAMER'S INTEGRAL THEOREM ; ITS REFINEMENT BY PETROV Chap 8
„ 3 Proof of the theorem Since
log R = log ~~ e"''dV (y) _ y Y'' by ,
(8 3 1)
00
y12 v!
where yy are the cumulants of the X3 (7 2 6), we have
d
00
Fn = - log log R = z i i hv_ l ,
(8 3 2)
v=2 (v)•
Y2 = 2 _2=
dh2
2
00
log R = E v
Y -2)! by-2 > 0
(8 3 3)
v=2 (
In the notation of „ 7 2, logR=K(h),
so that the factor multiplying the integral (8 2.12) is exp {n (K (h) - hK' (h)) }
( 8.3 4)
We now choose h to be the solution of the saddle point equation
where i=x/n 2 =o(1) According to (7 2 18) and (7 2 19) there holds, for sufficiently large n, the equation
K (h) - hK' (h) = K (h) - aT = -lz 2 + i 3 (z) ,
( 8 3 6) where A (z) is Cramer's series (7.2.20) Moreover, m= K' (h), so that by (8 3 5), ax -mn? = 0 Substituting (8 3 6) into (8 2 12), we therefore have
f
00
1-F©(x)=exp{n(-42+t3A(i))}
exp(-h6:n1y)dF©(y) (8 3.7)
0
We therefore have only to examine the integral in (8.3 7)
00 exp (- hini y) dF© (y)
0
Now F, is the distribution of the normalised sum
(8 3 8)
Trang 58 3
PROOF OF THE THEOREM
175
so that we can use the theorems of „ 3 5 From (8 3 3),
a = 6 + O (h) ,
(8 3 9)
and
Fn (y)
(y) + Qn (y) ,
Q, ,(y) = Bn - 2 ,
( 8 3 10)
so that
~co
exp(-hdn-Iy)dFP(y)=(2n)-J
00
exp(-hin#y-iy 2
)dy-0
0
-Q n (0)+h6n* Jo exp(-hdnly)Q n (y)dy
( 8 3 11)
The last integral in (8 3 11) is
o
Bn - hQnz
J exp(-hin y) dy = Bn - ,
(8 3 12)
0
and Q n (0) = Bn - , so that it remains only to estimate the integral
-
ex
hen
dy •
(8 3 13
00
(27r) -f
f o
p(
-
? y f )
) Now (8 3 2) and (8 3 5) imply that
hQnz = h6n++ 0(h 2 n+) ,
mn Z =C2
hn 4 + O (h 2 0) ,
so that
han 4 = mn4 o ' + O (h 2 n 4 )
( 8 3 14)
Substituting (8 3 14) into (8 3 13), we have the expression
00
(2n)-2
J exp(-mn 4 6 -1 y) exp(Bh2n4y) eXp(- 2y 2 )dy =
0
h- 1n1/2
exp(-mn 4 6 -1 y) exp(-Zy 2 )dy(1+0(h))+
0
+B exp(-2n2 h -2) _
f
00
=(2rr)_2
exp(-Fnn4 6 - 'y)exp(-2y2 )dy(1+0(h)) (8 3 15)
0
=exp (m e n/26 2 )(1-0(mn4 /a))(1 +O(h))
( 8 3 16)
Trang 6
CRAMER'S INTEGRAL THEOREM ; ITS REFINEMENT BY PETROV Chap 8
According to (8 3 4),
K'(h)/u = M-/c = ,r,
so that Ten/2a2=1ni2. Using this and (8 3 13), and substituting (8 3 16) into (8 3 7), we find that
1-F©(x)
= exp {ni3 ?,(i)} (1 +0(h))
(8 3 17) 1-'P(x)
Since h = 0 (i) = 0 (X/n2'2), the theorem follows