1. Trang chủ
  2. » Kỹ Thuật - Công Nghệ

Composite Materials for Aircraft

62 271 1
Tài liệu đã được kiểm tra trùng lặp

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

THÔNG TIN TÀI LIỆU

Thông tin cơ bản

Tiêu đề Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures: A Brief Review of Practical Application
Tác giả Jared W Nelson
Người hướng dẫn PhD Candidate
Trường học Montana State University
Chuyên ngành Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Thể loại Bài luận
Năm xuất bản 2010
Thành phố Bozeman
Định dạng
Số trang 62
Dung lượng 1,21 MB

Các công cụ chuyển đổi và chỉnh sửa cho tài liệu này

Nội dung

• Composite materials are used more and more for p primary structures in commercial, industrial, aerospace, marine, and recreational structures Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structure

Trang 1

Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures:

A Brief Review of Practical Application

Jared W Nelson, PhD Candidate

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering

Montana State University

ME 480 Introduction to Aerospace,

Spring 2010 p g

Trang 2

Composite materials are used more and more for p

primary structures in commercial, industrial, aerospace, marine, and recreational structures

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-2

Trang 3

From Last Time

Composite parts used for aircraft applications are defined by

– Material, process, and manufacturing specifications.

– Material allowable (engineering definition).

All of these have a basis in regulatory requirements.

Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft

Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft

structure is in applications with

– Highly loaded parts with thick gages.

– High fatigue loads (fuselage and wing structure, etc).

– Areas susceptible to corrosion (fuselage, etc).

Critical weight reduction (empennage wings fuselage etc)

– Critical weight reduction (empennage, wings, fuselage, etc).

Use must be justified by weighing benefits against costs.

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-3

Trang 4

Composition of Composites

• Good shear properties

Fiber/Filament

Reinforcement Matrix Composite

• Good shear properties

Trang 5

Micromechanics

Study of mechanical behavior of a composite material in terms of

– Study of mechanical behavior of a composite material in terms of its constituent materials

Ply Mechanics

– Study of mechanical behavior of individual material plies based

on variations from global coordinate system

Macromechanics

– Study of mechanical behavior utilizing ply mechanics of a

homogenized composite material

Failure Theories

Failure Theories

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-5

Trang 6

CADEC: Introduction

Compliment to text: Barbero, EJ Introduction to Composite

M t i l D i T l & F i 1999

Materials Design; Taylor & Francis, 1999.

Software free online—search keywords CADEC & Barbero

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-6

Trang 7

Assumptions in Micromechanics of Composites

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures

– Assumptions in Micromechanics of Composites

13-7

Trang 8

Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures

Vf,max approximately 78%

Common range = 55-67%

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-8

Trang 9

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-9

Trang 10

Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (E 1 )

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-10

Trang 11

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-11

Trang 12

Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (E 2 )

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-12

Trang 13

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-13

Trang 14

Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (ν 12 )

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-14

Trang 15

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-15

Trang 16

Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (G 12 )

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-16

Trang 17

Micromechanics: Other Methods & Strengths

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-17

Trang 18

Micromechanics: Halpin-Tsai (E 2 )

Halpin-Tsai: “Semiempirical (1969) version to obtain better

prediction”—Barbero

ζ ≡ empirical curve fitting parameter, commonly 2a/b

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-18

Trang 19

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-19

Trang 20

Micromechanics: Longitudinal Tensile Strength

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-20

Trang 21

Micromechanics: Determining Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-21

Trang 22

Micromechanics: Thermal & Electrical Cond

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-22

Trang 24

Ply Mechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-24

Trang 25

Ply Mechanics: Compliance Plane Stress

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-25

Trang 26

Ply Mechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-26

Trang 27

Ply Mechanics: Transformations

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-27

Trang 28

Ply Mechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-28

Trang 29

Ply Mechanics: Off-Axis Stiffness Matrices

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-29

Trang 30

Ply Mechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-30

Trang 31

Ply Mechanics: Stress-Strain Relationships

Stress-Strain Relationship: σ ij = C ij ε ij

With 3 planes Æ C ij has 81 terms, but since:

and: only 36 terms ij ji

to 9 terms:

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-31

Trang 32

Ply Mechanics: Orthotropic Material

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-32

Trang 33

What if there are multiple lamina at differing angles?

CADEC uses Micromechanics and Ply mechanics to determine:

– Stiffness and Compliance Equations

– Laminate Moduli

– Global and Material Stresses and Strains

– Strains and Curvatures

– Thermal and Hygroscopic loads yg p

– For both Intact and Degraded materials

Assumes: ssu es

– Plane sections remain plane

– Symmetry about a neutral surface

Trang 34

Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code

Tapes or Undirectional Tapes

[45/0/-45/902 /-45/0/45

• Each lamina is labeled by its ply orientation

• Laminae are listed in sequence with the first number representing the lamina to which the arrow is pointing.a a to c t e a o s po t g

• Individual adjacent laminae are separated by a slash if their angles differ

• Adjacent laminae of the same angle are depicted by a numerical subscript indicating the total number of laminae which are laid up in sequence at that angle

[45/0/-45/90] s

sequence at that angle

• Each complete laminate is enclosed by brackets

• When the laminate is symmetrical and has an even number on each side of the plane of symmetry (known as the midplane) the code may

be shortened by listing only the angles from the arrow side to the Tapes or undirectional tapes

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-34midplane A subscript “S” is used to indicate that the code for only one half of the laminate is shown

Trang 35

Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code

Fabrics and Tapes and Fabrics

[(45)/(0)/(45)]

Midplane

• When plies of fabric are used in a laminate The angle of the fabric warp is used as the ply direction angle The fabric angle is enclosed in parentheses

[(45)/0(-45)/90]

Fabrics

to identify the ply as a fabric ply.

• When the laminate is composed of both fabric and tape plies (a hybrid laminate) The parentheses around the fabric plies will distinguish the fabric

Midplane

plies from the tape plies.

• When the laminate is symmetrical and has an odd number of plies, the center ply is overlined to

indicate that it is the midplane.

Tapes & Fabrics

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-35

p

Trang 36

Macromechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-36

Trang 37

Macromechanics: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-37

Trang 38

Macromechanics: Defining Laminate

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-38

Trang 39

Macromechanics: Defining Laminate

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-39

Trang 40

Macromechanics: Material Properties

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-40

Trang 41

Macromechanics: CADEC Quirkiness

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-41

Trang 42

Macromechanics: Review Outputs

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-42

Trang 43

Macromechanics: Global Stresses

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-43

Trang 44

Macromechanics: ABD Matrices

[B] relates in-plane strains to

bending moments and

curvatures to in-plane

forces—bending-extension

coupling.

[H] relates transverse shear

strains to transverse forces.

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-44

Trang 45

Macromechanics: ABD Matrices

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-45

Trang 46

Macromechanics: ABD Matrices

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-46

Trang 47

Macromechanics: Stiffness Equations

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-47

Trang 48

Macromechanics: Stiffness Equations

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-48

Trang 49

Macromechanics: Laminate Moduli

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-49

Trang 50

Macromechanics: Laminate Moduli

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-50

Trang 51

Macromechanics: Degraded Material

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-51

Trang 52

Macromechanics: Degraded Material

What is a degraded material?

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-52

Trang 53

Macromechanics: ABD Comparison

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-53

Trang 54

Macromechanics: CADEC Alt Methods

Data can be entered into

DAT and DEF files

.DAT and DEF files

– Easily reloaded into CADEC

– More user friendly

Enter laminate

Open CADEC

Load Laminate

Run Laminate Analysis

Run Laminate Analysis

Analyze

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-54

Trang 55

Failure Theories

Many failure criteria, most popular:

– Maximum stress criterion

M i t i it i

– Maximum strain criterion

– Tsai-Hill failure criterion

– Tsai-Wu failure criterion

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-55

Trang 56

Not Just An Academic Exercise

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-56

Consequence of Misalignment in Large, Composite Structure

Trang 57

Failure Theories: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-57

Trang 58

Failure Theories: CADEC

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-58

Trang 59

Failure Theories: Max Stress Criterion

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-59

Trang 60

Failure Theories: Tsai-Wu Criterion

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-60

Trang 61

CADEC Demo

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-61

Trang 62

Concluding Remarks

Composite design fairly simple

– Assumptions lead to simplified analysis

Id li d

– Idealized

– Real-world?

CADEC

– Begin with component properties

– Micromechanic, Ply and Macromechanic analysis

– Apply loads and match against failure criteria

– Simple structures (Not covered)

– Software options: COMPRO, MSExcel, Matlab, MathCAD, etc.

Composites still require significant analysis and physical testing p q g y p y g

Parts/Structures are only as good as the manufacturing

– “You can never make good parts with bad materials, but you can easily make bad parts with good materials!”

Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures

parts with good materials!

13-62

Ngày đăng: 24/06/2014, 09:27

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN