• Composite materials are used more and more for p primary structures in commercial, industrial, aerospace, marine, and recreational structures Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structure
Trang 1Composite Materials for Aircraft Structures:
A Brief Review of Practical Application
Jared W Nelson, PhD Candidate
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Montana State University
ME 480 Introduction to Aerospace,
Spring 2010 p g
Trang 2• Composite materials are used more and more for p
primary structures in commercial, industrial, aerospace, marine, and recreational structures
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-2
Trang 3From Last Time
• Composite parts used for aircraft applications are defined by
– Material, process, and manufacturing specifications.
– Material allowable (engineering definition).
• All of these have a basis in regulatory requirements.
• Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft
• Most efficient use of advanced composites in aircraft
structure is in applications with
– Highly loaded parts with thick gages.
– High fatigue loads (fuselage and wing structure, etc).
– Areas susceptible to corrosion (fuselage, etc).
Critical weight reduction (empennage wings fuselage etc)
– Critical weight reduction (empennage, wings, fuselage, etc).
• Use must be justified by weighing benefits against costs.
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-3
Trang 4Composition of Composites
• Good shear properties
Fiber/Filament
Reinforcement Matrix Composite
• Good shear properties
Trang 5• Micromechanics
Study of mechanical behavior of a composite material in terms of
– Study of mechanical behavior of a composite material in terms of its constituent materials
• Ply Mechanics
– Study of mechanical behavior of individual material plies based
on variations from global coordinate system
• Macromechanics
– Study of mechanical behavior utilizing ply mechanics of a
homogenized composite material
• Failure Theories
• Failure Theories
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-5
Trang 6CADEC: Introduction
Compliment to text: Barbero, EJ Introduction to Composite
M t i l D i T l & F i 1999
Materials Design; Taylor & Francis, 1999.
Software free online—search keywords CADEC & Barbero
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-6
Trang 7Assumptions in Micromechanics of Composites
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures
– Assumptions in Micromechanics of Composites
13-7
Trang 8Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures
Vf,max approximately 78%
Common range = 55-67%
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-8
Trang 9Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-9
Trang 10Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (E 1 )
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-10
Trang 11Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-11
Trang 12Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (E 2 )
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-12
Trang 13Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-13
Trang 14Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (ν 12 )
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-14
Trang 15Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-15
Trang 16Micromechanics: Rule of Mixtures (G 12 )
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-16
Trang 17Micromechanics: Other Methods & Strengths
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-17
Trang 18Micromechanics: Halpin-Tsai (E 2 )
Halpin-Tsai: “Semiempirical (1969) version to obtain better
prediction”—Barbero
ζ ≡ empirical curve fitting parameter, commonly 2a/b
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-18
Trang 19Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-19
Trang 20Micromechanics: Longitudinal Tensile Strength
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-20
Trang 21Micromechanics: Determining Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-21
Trang 22Micromechanics: Thermal & Electrical Cond
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-22
Trang 24Ply Mechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-24
Trang 25Ply Mechanics: Compliance Plane Stress
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-25
Trang 26Ply Mechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-26
Trang 27Ply Mechanics: Transformations
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-27
Trang 28Ply Mechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-28
Trang 29Ply Mechanics: Off-Axis Stiffness Matrices
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-29
Trang 30Ply Mechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-30
Trang 31Ply Mechanics: Stress-Strain Relationships
• Stress-Strain Relationship: σ ij = C ij ε ij
• With 3 planes Æ C ij has 81 terms, but since:
and: only 36 terms ij ji
to 9 terms:
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-31
Trang 32Ply Mechanics: Orthotropic Material
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-32
Trang 33• What if there are multiple lamina at differing angles?
• CADEC uses Micromechanics and Ply mechanics to determine:
– Stiffness and Compliance Equations
– Laminate Moduli
– Global and Material Stresses and Strains
– Strains and Curvatures
– Thermal and Hygroscopic loads yg p
– For both Intact and Degraded materials
• Assumes: ssu es
– Plane sections remain plane
– Symmetry about a neutral surface
Trang 34Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code
Tapes or Undirectional Tapes
[45/0/-45/902 /-45/0/45
• Each lamina is labeled by its ply orientation
• Laminae are listed in sequence with the first number representing the lamina to which the arrow is pointing.a a to c t e a o s po t g
• Individual adjacent laminae are separated by a slash if their angles differ
• Adjacent laminae of the same angle are depicted by a numerical subscript indicating the total number of laminae which are laid up in sequence at that angle
[45/0/-45/90] s
sequence at that angle
• Each complete laminate is enclosed by brackets
• When the laminate is symmetrical and has an even number on each side of the plane of symmetry (known as the midplane) the code may
be shortened by listing only the angles from the arrow side to the Tapes or undirectional tapes
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-34midplane A subscript “S” is used to indicate that the code for only one half of the laminate is shown
Trang 35Shorthand Laminate Orientation Code
Fabrics and Tapes and Fabrics
[(45)/(0)/(45)]
Midplane
• When plies of fabric are used in a laminate The angle of the fabric warp is used as the ply direction angle The fabric angle is enclosed in parentheses
[(45)/0(-45)/90]
Fabrics
to identify the ply as a fabric ply.
• When the laminate is composed of both fabric and tape plies (a hybrid laminate) The parentheses around the fabric plies will distinguish the fabric
Midplane
plies from the tape plies.
• When the laminate is symmetrical and has an odd number of plies, the center ply is overlined to
indicate that it is the midplane.
Tapes & Fabrics
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-35
p
Trang 36Macromechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-36
Trang 37Macromechanics: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-37
Trang 38Macromechanics: Defining Laminate
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-38
Trang 39Macromechanics: Defining Laminate
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-39
Trang 40Macromechanics: Material Properties
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-40
Trang 41Macromechanics: CADEC Quirkiness
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-41
Trang 42Macromechanics: Review Outputs
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-42
Trang 43Macromechanics: Global Stresses
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-43
Trang 44Macromechanics: ABD Matrices
– [B] relates in-plane strains to
bending moments and
curvatures to in-plane
forces—bending-extension
coupling.
– [H] relates transverse shear
strains to transverse forces.
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-44
Trang 45Macromechanics: ABD Matrices
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-45
Trang 46Macromechanics: ABD Matrices
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-46
Trang 47Macromechanics: Stiffness Equations
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-47
Trang 48Macromechanics: Stiffness Equations
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-48
Trang 49Macromechanics: Laminate Moduli
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-49
Trang 50Macromechanics: Laminate Moduli
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-50
Trang 51Macromechanics: Degraded Material
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-51
Trang 52Macromechanics: Degraded Material
• What is a degraded material?
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-52
Trang 53Macromechanics: ABD Comparison
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-53
Trang 54Macromechanics: CADEC Alt Methods
• Data can be entered into
DAT and DEF files
.DAT and DEF files
– Easily reloaded into CADEC
– More user friendly
• Enter laminate
• Open CADEC
• Load Laminate
• Run Laminate Analysis
• Run Laminate Analysis
• Analyze
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-54
Trang 55Failure Theories
• Many failure criteria, most popular:
– Maximum stress criterion
M i t i it i
– Maximum strain criterion
– Tsai-Hill failure criterion
– Tsai-Wu failure criterion
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-55
Trang 56Not Just An Academic Exercise
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-56
Consequence of Misalignment in Large, Composite Structure
Trang 57Failure Theories: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-57
Trang 58Failure Theories: CADEC
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-58
Trang 59Failure Theories: Max Stress Criterion
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-59
Trang 60Failure Theories: Tsai-Wu Criterion
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-60
Trang 61CADEC Demo
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures 13-61
Trang 62Concluding Remarks
• Composite design fairly simple
– Assumptions lead to simplified analysis
Id li d
– Idealized
– Real-world?
• CADEC
– Begin with component properties
– Micromechanic, Ply and Macromechanic analysis
– Apply loads and match against failure criteria
– Simple structures (Not covered)
– Software options: COMPRO, MSExcel, Matlab, MathCAD, etc.
• Composites still require significant analysis and physical testing p q g y p y g
• Parts/Structures are only as good as the manufacturing
– “You can never make good parts with bad materials, but you can easily make bad parts with good materials!”
Design and Analysis of Aircraft Structures
parts with good materials!
13-62